AP joined does not WLC

Similar Questions

• Outer join does not not as expected left

  Hi all

  I have it here are three tables with values. Mentioned the under outer join query does not and behave like the inner query.

  CREATE TABLE RET_FUND_FEE

  (

  NPTF VARCHAR2 (8 CHAR),

  TPART VARCHAR2 (4 CHAR)

  );

  CREATE TABLE PART_PTF

  (

  Mf_Id VARCHAR2 (6 CHAR) NOT NULL,

  TPARTS VARCHAR2 (4 CHAR) NOT NULL

  );

  CREATE TABLE TFC_FUNDS

  (

  NPTF VARCHAR2 (8 CHAR) NOT NULL,

  MULTIFONDS_ID VARCHAR2 (6 CHAR)

  );

  INSERT INTO RET_FUND_FEE VALUES('111','A');

  INSERT INTO RET_FUND_FEE VALUES('111','D');

  INSERT INTO RET_FUND_FEE VALUES('111','E');

  INSERT INTO PART_PTF VALUES ('MF1', 'A');

  INSERT INTO PART_PTF VALUES ('MF1', 'B');

  INSERT INTO PART_PTF VALUES('MF1','C');

  INSERT INTO TFC_FUNDS VALUES('111','MF1');

  INSERT INTO TFC_FUNDS VALUES('111','MF1');

  INSERT INTO TFC_FUNDS VALUES('111','MF1');

  SELECT A.TPART, B.TPARTS, A.NPTF, B.Mf_Id, C.MULTIFONDS_ID, C.NPTF

  OF RET_FUND_FEE A, PART_PTF B, TFC_FUNDS C

  WHERE A.NPTF = C.NPTF

  AND C.MULTIFONDS_ID = B.Mf_Id

  AND A.TPART = B.TPARTS (+)

  AND C.MULTIFONDS_ID = 'MF1 '.

  AND C.NPTF = '111'

  Here, I expect all records in the RET_FUND_FEE table that I am using outer join.

  But I'm only corresponding chronogram RET_FUND_FEE, PART_PTF as an inner join. Can you get it someone please let me know what lack us.

  Is my version of oracle 11g

  SELECT

  A.TPART, B.TPARTS, A.NPTF, B.Mf_Id, C.MULTIFONDS_ID, C.NPTF

  Of

  PART_PTF B

  Join

  C TFC_FUNDS

  on (C.MULTIFONDS_ID = B.Mf_Id

  AND C.MULTIFONDS_ID = 'MF1 '.

  AND C.NPTF = '111'

  )

  right outer join

  RET_FUND_FEE HAS

  on (A.TPART = B.TPARTS

  and A.NPTF = C.NPTF) - added as correction

  TPART	TPARTS	NPTF	MF_ID	MULTIFONDS_ID	NPTF
  A	A	111	MF1	MF1	111
  A	A	111	MF1	MF1	111
  A	A	111	MF1	MF1	111
  E	-	111	-	-	-
  D	-	111	-	-	-

  or

  SELECT A.TPART, d.TPARTS, A.NPTF, d.Mf_Id, d.MULTIFONDS_ID, d.NPTF

  OF RET_FUND_FEE HAS

  , (

  Select

  *

  PART_PTF b, TFC_FUNDS C

  where B.Mf_Id = C.MULTIFONDS_ID

  AND C.MULTIFONDS_ID = 'MF1 '.

  AND C.NPTF = '111'

  ) d

  WHERE A.TPART = D.TPARTS (+)

  and A.NPTF = D.NPTF (+) - added as a correction

  Sorry had to correct the syntax oracle solution.

  The first one was bad because it would return also B lines that have no match in C.

  Sorry a correction more on these two approaches, missed the second predicate.

• Left Outer Join does not work why?

  Hello
  
  I have a question I want to return all the id group grp_id table and count and give me a count of all "active" members in the Member table. There are a few members who are not active in the table of members who belong to groups in the grp_id table. I still want a record returned for these grpid, but since there is no active members for these groups, I would like a zero as the mbr_count. An active mbr is the one whose eff_dt is less than the date of the day and whose exp_dt is greater than today's date.
  
  I have listed the query below, which returns active records mbr, but unfortunately does not return a grpid (as in my example of data) is not an active member (grpid: has ""). I have also provided the DDL for both tables as well as some examples of data that gives me the (Incorrect) results, that I posted. I have also posted what I need (the 'Correct' results).
  
  Thanks for any help... (I use PL/SQL)
  
  THE QUERY I USE:
  =============
  SELECT
  G00.grpid,
  Count (M00.grpid) mbr_count
  Of
  g00 grp_id
  LEFT OUTER JOIN
  m00 MBR on
  G00.grpid = m00.grpid
  WHERE
  M00.eff_dt < sysdate
  AND
  M00.exp_dt > sysdate
  GROUP BY
  G00.grpid
  
  It gives me results like:
  
  INCORRECT RESULTS:
  ===============
  GRPID MBR_COUNT
  A 2
  B 2
  C 1
  
  I want to see is:
  
  CORRECT RESULTS
  ===============
  GRPID MBR_COUNT
  A 2
  B 2
  C 1
  D 0
  
  
  Here's the DOF and the sample data:
  
  create table grp_id (grpid varchar (1))
  
  insert into grp_id values ('A')
  insert into grp_id values ('B')
  insert into grp_id values ('C')
  insert into grp_id values (')
  
  Commit
  
  create table mbr (mbr_name varchar (10), varchar (1) grpid, eff_dt date, exp_dt date)
  
  insert into values of mbr ('BRAND', 'A', to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '), to_date (July 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '))
  insert into values of mbr ('BRAND', 'A', to_date (July 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '))
  
  insert into values of mbr ('MARTY', 'A', to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '), to_date (July 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '))
  insert into values of mbr ('MARTY', 'A', to_date (July 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '))
  
  insert into values of mbr ('FRANK', 'B', to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '), to_date (July 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '))
  insert into values of mbr ('FRANK', 'B', to_date (July 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '))
  
  insert into values of mbr ('MARY', 'B', to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '), to_date (July 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '))
  insert into values of mbr ('MARY', 'B', to_date (July 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '))
  
  insert into values of mbr ('JOHN', 'C', to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '), to_date (July 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '))
  insert into values of mbr ('JOHN', 'C', to_date (July 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '))
  
  insert into values of mbr ("NOAM" 'd', to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY '), to_date (July 1, 2011 ',' DD-MM-YYYY ') ")

  Thanks for the script, shame on the missing semicolon :)

  Your date restrictions are implemented as "filter predicates" rather than "join predicates.
  that is the difference between a place ANDS extra o in the JOIN clause.

  SQL> SELECT
    2  g00.grpid,
    3  count(m00.grpid) mbr_count
    4  FROM
    5  grp_id g00
    6  LEFT OUTER JOIN
    7  mbr m00 on
    8  g00.grpid = m00.grpid
    9  WHERE
   10  m00.eff_dt < sysdate
   11  AND
   12  m00.exp_dt > sysdate
   13  GROUP BY
   14  g00.grpid
   15  /
  
  G  MBR_COUNT
  - ----------
  A          4
  B          4
  C          2
  
  SQL> SELECT
    2  g00.grpid,
    3  count(m00.grpid) mbr_count
    4  FROM
    5  grp_id g00
    6  LEFT OUTER JOIN
    7  mbr m00 on
    8  g00.grpid = m00.grpid
    9  AND
   10  m00.eff_dt < sysdate
   11  AND
   12  m00.exp_dt > sysdate
   13  GROUP BY
   14  g00.grpid;
  
  G  MBR_COUNT
  - ----------
  D          0
  A          4
  B          4
  C          2
  
  SQL> 
  

• Outer join does not

  Hello
  
  Pls help me my request. I tried the following, but it does not give the expected results.
  
  Tab1
  EmplId, RepDt, Code, Hrs
  1/100,1/2009,199,8
  1/100,1/2009,200,4
  1/100,1/2009,255,3
  200,1/1/2009,200,4
  100.5/1/2009,199,8
  
  
  Tab2
  EmplId, RepDt, Code, Hrs
  1/100,1/2009,200,6
  200,1/1/2009,200,3
  
  I need output like this - 4 rows - need of all the rows from TAB1 when EMPLID, REPDT match TAB2, field values: need at a time when Code is also, when emlid, correspondence of the date, the Code missing so need A hrs, display ZERO as Tab2 hours.
  
  1/100,1/2009,199,8,0 - did not exist is not in tab2, so hrs Tab2 is ZERO
  1/100,1/2009,200,4,6 - Emplid, RepDt, Code match existence in Tab2, Tab1 Hrs 8, 6 Hrs Tab2
  1/100,1/2009,255,3,0 - did not exist is not in Tab2, so Tab2 hrs is equal to ZERO
  200,1/1/2009,200,4,3 - Emplid, Repdt, Code Match existed in Tab2, 4 Hrs of Tab1, Tab2 3 Hrs
  
  We are in 10g, Oracle.
  
  I tried the following
  T1. EmplId = T2.emplid AND T1.repdt = T2.repdt AND T1.code, T2.code = (+) - returns the unique corresponding lines, 2 rows.
  
  Pls help.
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  Published by: NL 23 February 2009 09:20

  Hello

  See the Boneist first message in this thread:

  select t1.emplid, t1.repdt, t1.code, t1.hrs, nvl(t2.hrs, 0)
  from   tab1 t1,
         tab2 t2
  where  t1.emplid = t2.emplid (+)
  and    t1.repdt = t2.repdt (+)
  and    t1.code = t2.code (+)
  and    (t1.emplid, t1.repdt) in (select emplid, repdt
                                   from   tab2)
  order by repdt, emplid, code;
  

  As Boneist said, this fact corresponds to option (b)
  "(b) do just an outer join, with a condition EXISTS (or IN) in the WHERE clause to find corresponding repdts.
  The

  (+)
  

  an outer join are signs.

• decode in an outer join does not

  Hello
  I have a query which does not work; How to rewrite to make it work?
  Thanks in advance for your suggestions
  
  SELECT tab1.colA
  tab2.colA
  tab2.colB
  OF tab1
  tab2
  WHERE tab1.colA = tab2.colA (+)
  AND tab1.colB = tab2.colB (+)
  AND decode (tab2.colC, tab2.colD, tab2.colC, 'Y') (+) = 'Y '.
  GROUP BY tab1.colA
  tab2.colA
  tab2.colB

  1 post explain plan
  2. explain what you're trying to do. I have a feeling that you need:

  SELECT  tab1.colA,
          tab2.colA,
          tab2.colB
    FROM  tab1,
          (
           select  colA,
                   colB
             from  tab2
             where decode(tab2.colC,tab2.colD,tab2.colC,'Y') = 'Y'
          ) tab2
    WHERE tab1.colA = tab2.colA(+)
      AND tab1.colB = tab2.colB(+)
      GROUP BY tab1.colA,
            tab2.colA,
            tab2.colB
  /
  

  SY.

• Thread.Join () does not work

  I did a media player, and I use a database to store data, after playing a song for a while, I store the current position in the Pb, so I can continue to play the next time. I use a thread to update the db, so that he can play the next song at the same time what the db update.

  The problem is when I close the application, I want the event dispatch thread to wait until the thread of db update is finished, the code is:

  If (needWait == true) {}
  logThread.join ();
  }

  but it seems don't work and make the application non-response, where will not?

  A big loop on the thread of events blocks before the end of the loop.  But the OS won't know that the UI Thread is really busy.

  However, thread. Join blocks just the thread of events...

  So why don't; t it becomes sensitive?  There are all sorts of reasons.  Maybe the other Thread is not complete.  There may be something in this Thread that requires access to the event Thread, as synchronize the lock of the event or of nullity.  There may be something in this Thread that locks.  Or maybe the BlackBerry OS throws your Thread.join because it blocks the event Thread?

  I do not know, and to be honest, I'm not sure that this is not important.  The important think is here to get your code to work and to do so, in my opinion, you need to move your join off the thread of events.

  If you ignore this advice, it's good, I don't mind.  Your call - this is your code.  I've been wrong before, and I'll be wrong again.  But you have the best advice that I can give you.

  And I must admit that I never use thread.join, even in Background Threads.  I always use wait/notify.  But that's just me.

• Join does not work for NULL values on the join condition

  Hello
  
  I have the following problem.
  
  SQL > select * from a;
  
  X Y
  ---------- --------------------
  1
  2
  3
  4
  
  SQL > select * from b;
  
  A:
  ---------- --------------------
  1
  2
  
  
  
  SQL > select f.x, f.y, s.b in f, s b
  2 where f.x = s.b (+);
  X Y B
  ---------- -------------------- ----------
  1 1
  2 2
  4
  3
  
  
  
  
  SQL > select f.x, f.y, s.b in f, s b
  2 where f.x = s.b (+)
  3 and f.y = s.y;
  
  no selected line
  
  
  So now if I include a join condition more where null = null situation arises, it's working now.
  Just tell her not to treat (1 and null) (1 and null) are the same.
  What is the solution. This is an expected behavior.
  
  
  Thank you
  Pramod Garre

  Pramod salvation,

  Another way to use the outer join is,

  Select f.x, f.y, s.b
  of a, f, s b
  where f.x = s.b (+)
  and nvl(f.y,0) = nvl (s.y (+), 0);

  Hope this will help you.

  Thank you
  Amit

• SQL JOIN DOES NOT

  I've done several times, but I must of missed something and cannot operate

  I have a php DB with tables

  1 LettingsTenApp

  2 LFeProp

  both have a column

  propID

  I'm trying to join them, based on the user name (which is the user's e-mail address)

  $colname_rsTenant = "-1";

  If (isset($_SESSION['MM_Username'])) {}

  $colname_rsTenant = $_SESSION ['MM_Username"];

  }

  @mysql_select_db ($database_Letting, $Letting);

  $query_rsTenant = sprintf ("" SELECT * FROM LettingsTenApp, LFeProp WHERE tenEmail = %s AND LettingsTenApp.propID = LFeProp.propID ", GetSQLValueString ($colname_rsTenant,"text")");

  $rsTenant = mysql_query ($query_rsTenant, $hostLetting) or die (mysql_error ());

  $row_rsTenant = mysql_fetch_assoc ($rsTenant);

  $totalRows_rsTenant = mysql_num_rows ($rsTenant);

  If I delete the LettingsTenApp.propID = LFeProp.propID join and just the tenEmail = %s then the filter works.

  can you see where I am going wrong?

  Thank you

  > I have a php DB with tables

  What is a php DB?

  > if I delete the join LettingsTenApp.propID = LFeProp.propID

  > and just the tenEmail = %s then the filter works.

  Are you sure that there is a corresponding value in the other table? We show the results of the query that runs when the join is removed. Then do a

  SELECT * from LFeProp WHERE LFeProp = (value from the first query Prop)

• outer join does not give the expected results (missing documents)

  Hello
  I have problem with outer join in OBIEE 10 g.
  
  I'm testing it on the model of simplified database
  
  STAT table with some statistics of TYPEs
  stat_date, id_type, num
  ..
  ..
  26/03/2003, 20: 1
  26/03/2003, 21: 1
  26/03/2003, 23: 1
  26/03/2003, 24, 1
  26/03/2003, 25, 1
  ..
  27/03/2003, 22, 1 <-different date here
  ..
  ..
  
  Table TYPES
  ID_type
  ..
  ..
  20
  21
  22
  23
  24
  25
  ..
  ..
  
  
  Physical model
  STAT >-TYPES
  
  
  AM.
  F1 (only Digital STAT table column (agg. County))
  D1 (STAT_DATE of the STAT table column only)
  D2 (source TYPES)
  
  D1 - inner join - < F1
  D2 - left outer join - < F1
  
  
  I would like to create simple report filtered by date with number of each type.
  I want to get this result
  ID_type County
  ..     ..
  ..     ..
  20 1
  21 1
  22 null
  23 1
  24 1
  25 1
  ..     ..
  ..     ..
  
  
  But I get this
  ID_type County
  ..     ..
  ..     ..
  20 1
  21 1
  23 1
  24 1
  25 1
  ..     ..
  ..     ..
  
  ID_type 22 is missing
  
  
  !!!
  
  I NORMALLY GET RESULT ONLY IF I DELETE RECORD ' 27/03/2003 22' OF MY FACT TABLE.
  
  !!!
  
  
  I have the filter on the date column D1
  STAT_DATE = 26/03/2003 or STAT_DATE is null
  
  
  BI Server running this SQL query
  
  
  Select distinct D1.c1 as c1,
  D1. C2 C2
  Of
  (select count (T17840. NUM) in c1.
  T17867.ID_TYPE C2
  Of
  Left outer join of TYPES T17867
  STAT T17840 on T17840.ID_TYPE = T17867.ID_TYPE
  where (T17840. STAT_DATE in (TO_DATE ('2003-03-26', 'YYYY-MM-DD')) or T17840. STAT_DATE is null)
  T17867.ID_TYPE group
  ) D1
  
  
  Can you give me some advice?
  
  Thank you

  Hi cardel,

  I think that you can achieve your goal if you build a dimension of the array STAT form, you can create a table Alias in the physical layer and then to join the table of facts (external to the left). In this way, I think that you can solve your problem.

  Let me know.

  Kind regards
  Gianluca

• Airport utility does not have Wifi

  Hello, I tried to set up an airport 1088 on el capitan with the usual pitcher, but when he invites me to select the wifi network selection menu is empty. Any tips?

  What you're trying to do is not officially supported by Apple, so some hiccups are to be expected.

  If the name of the wireless network to which the AirPort Express "will join" does not appear, on everything that you can do is try to type the name of the network, choose a type of wireless security (try WPA/WPA2 Personal) and manually type the wireless network password.

  Another question may also be that a 9 + years, AirPort Express, that lists Apple as "Obsolète", still works properly... Since the average lifecycle of this version of the Express was about 3-4 years.

  Another question would be to know if an Express which is able to connect only to a 802. 11B or 802. 11 g Wireless will be able to connect to the latest 802.11n or 802.11ac wireless network signal, which are common in these days.

• Join query not received from WLC

  Hi all

  I am in the process of autonomous update 1242 (MIC) APs belongs to an external client to make them a part of the existing lwapp based infrastructure.

  I have seen successful negotiations of discovery. Then AP sends the join query, but the WLC debugging does not receive the product.

  1. the capture of wireshark packages indicates that Discovery & jOin process use identical to each phased ports: it will be exclude firewalls.

  2. no duplicate IPs

  3 controllers are not exhausted with APs

  4 DHCP option 43 is set up and could see it in action when I do a debug dhcp

  Another interesting observation is that I couldn't see any CERT on autonomous before conveting to lwapp APs when I have HS crypto pki certificates

  Please refer to the attachment for debugging output.

  Any help is very appreciated.

  see you soon,

  janesha

  You open the FW for UDP 12223 and also you have the ip helper and the ip Protocol before?

• Access point does not connect to my WLC

  Hi all

  I have a strange...

  I have 5 AP1000 used to connect to my WLC without problem, now they will not join with the WLC.

  I have the following error in syslog "no Council payload of data found in the join query? I'm also 10 AP1242 who register without problem. Does anyone have any ideas how I can get these babies to join the WLC?

  See you soon

  Colin

  Yes, 1000 access points are supported only on code 4.2... They do not have enough memory to support higher levels of code...

• Cisco AIR-LAP1041N-E-K9 does not not with WLC 4402 version 7.0.116.0

  Hi all

  appreciate your support for a problem I started to deal with today. I have a Cisco WLC 4402 running the 7.0.116.0 version and it's great to work with 25 Cisco 1252 access points. We received a new 20 Cisco 1041N APs today and I installed one in our site, but it does not work. He well worked and loaded the flash image and obtained WLC ip through DHCP option address and began to show the below error:

  * 00:00:10.021 Mar 1: % SOAP_FIPS-2-SELF_TEST_IOS_SUCCESS: crypto IOS FIPS self-test passed

  * 00:00:10.033 Mar 1: * CRASH_LOG = YES

  * 00:00:10.333 Mar 1: 1 Port is not presentSecurity base.

  MAC Ethernet address of base: C8:9 C: 1 D: 53:57:5E

  * 00:00:11.373 Mar 1: % SOAP_FIPS-2-SELF_TEST_RAD_SUCCESS: crypto RADIO FIPS self-test passed on Dot11Radio interface 0

  * 00:00:11.465 Mar 1: % LWAPP-3-CLIENTEVENTLOG: reading and initialized AP event log (contains, 1088 messages)

  * 00:00:11.494 Mar 1: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 00:00:12.526 Mar 1: % LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0, changed State to

  * 00:00:13.594 Mar 1: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0, changed State to

  * 00:00:13.647 Mar 1: % SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted.

  Cisco IOS software, software C1040 (C1140-K9W8-M), Version 12.4 (23 c) JA2, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc3)

  Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport

  Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc.

  Updated Thursday, April 13, 11 12:50 by prod_rel_team

  * 00:00:13.647 Mar 1: % SNMP-5-start COLD: SNMP agent on host APc89c.1d53.575e knows a cold start

  * 00:08:59.062 Mar 1: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 1 Mar 00:08:59.062: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 00:08:59.138 Mar 1: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to reset

  * 00:08:59.837 Mar 1: % SSH-5-ACTIVATED: SSH 2.0 has been activated

  * 00:09:00.145 Mar 1: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on the Interface Dot11Radio0, state change downstairs

  * 00:09:09.136 Mar 1: % ADDRESS_ASSIGN-6-DHCP: Interface GigabitEthernet0 assigned address DHCP 172.16.26.81, mask 255.255.255.0, hostname APc89c.1d53.575e

  * 00:09:17.912 Mar 1: % PARSER-4-BADCFG: unexpected end of the configuration file.

  * 00:09:17.912 Mar 1: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 00:09:17.984 Mar 1: message logging LWAPP to 255.255.255.255.

  * 00:09:19.865 Mar 1: % CDP_PD-4-POWER_OK: full power - supply NEGOTIATED online

  * 00:09:19.886 Mar 1: % LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to

  * 00:09:20.873 Mar 1: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to

  * 00:09:20.874 Mar 1: % SYS-6-LOGGINGHOST_STARTSTOP: logging to host started 255.255.255.255 - initiated CLI

  Translate "CISCO-CAPWAP - CONTROLLER.atheertele.com"... the domain server (172.16.40.240)

  * 00:09:29.029 Mar 1: % CAPWAP-5-DHCP_OPTION_43: the 172.16.100.102 drive address obtained by DHCP

  * 08:27:02.000 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:02.001 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to

  * 08:27:03.175 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created successfully peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:03.177 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: send request to join 172.16.100.101

  * 08:27:03.177 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to ADHERE

  * 08:27:03.329 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state CFG

  * 08:27:03.333 may 25: % DTLS-5-ALERT: WARNING received: close notify alert from 172.16.100.101

  * 25 May 08:27:03.333: % PEER_DISCONNECT-5-DTLS: Peer 172.16.100.101 has closed the connection.

  * 08:27:03.333 may 25: % DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: send FATAL: close notify alert at 172.16.100.101:5246

  * 08:27:03.378 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 08:27:03.378 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 25 May 08:27:03.378: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 25 May 08:27:03.448: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 08:27:14.000 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:14.001 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to

  * 08:27:15.185 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created successfully peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:15.186 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: send request to join 172.16.100.101

  * 08:27:15.186 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to ADHERE

  * 08:27:15.330 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state CFG

  * 08:27:15.333 may 25: % DTLS-5-ALERT: WARNING received: close notify alert from 172.16.100.101

  * 25 May 08:27:15.334: % PEER_DISCONNECT-5-DTLS: Peer 172.16.100.101 has closed the connection.

  * 08:27:15.334 may 25: % DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: send FATAL: close notify alert at 172.16.100.101:5246

  * 08:27:15.379 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 08:27:15.379 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 25 May 08:27:15.379: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 25 May 08:27:15.450: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 08:27:26.000 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:26.001 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to

  * 08:27:27.182 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created successfully peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:27.183 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: send request to join 172.16.100.101

  * 08:27:27.184 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to ADHERE

  * 08:27:27.329 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state CFG

  * 08:27:27.333 may 25: % DTLS-5-ALERT: WARNING received: close notify alert from 172.16.100.101

  * 25 May 08:27:27.333: % PEER_DISCONNECT-5-DTLS: Peer 172.16.100.101 has closed the connection.

  * 08:27:27.333 may 25: % DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: send FATAL: close notify alert at 172.16.100.101:5246

  * 08:27:27.377 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 08:27:27.377 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 25 May 08:27:27.377: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 08:27:27.433 may 25: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state down administratively

  * 08:27:27.446 may 25: % PARSER-4-BADCFG: unexpected end of the configuration file.

  * 25 May 08:27:27.447: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 08:27:27.448 may 25: % LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to

  * 08:27:27.456 may 25: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to reset

  * 08:27:38.000 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:38.001 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to

  * 08:27:39.183 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created successfully peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:39.184 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: send request to join 172.16.100.101

  * 08:27:39.184 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to ADHERE

  * 08:27:39.326 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state CFG

  * 08:27:39.329 may 25: % DTLS-5-ALERT: WARNING received: close notify alert from 172.16.100.101

  * 25 May 08:27:39.329: % PEER_DISCONNECT-5-DTLS: Peer 172.16.100.101 has closed the connection.

  * 08:27:39.330 may 25: % DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: send FATAL: close notify alert at 172.16.100.101:5246

  * 08:27:39.375 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 08:27:39.375 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 25 May 08:27:39.375: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 25 May 08:27:39.446: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 08:27:49.000 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:49.001 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to

  * 08:27:50.179 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created successfully peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:50.180 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: send request to join 172.16.100.101

  * 08:27:50.180 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to ADHERE

  * 08:27:50.323 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state CFG

  * 08:27:50.326 may 25: % DTLS-5-ALERT: WARNING received: close notify alert from 172.16.100.101

  * 25 May 08:27:50.326: % PEER_DISCONNECT-5-DTLS: Peer 172.16.100.101 has closed the connection.

  * 08:27:50.326 may 25: % DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: send FATAL: close notify alert at 172.16.100.101:5246

  * 08:27:50.370 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 08:27:50.370 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 25 May 08:27:50.370: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 08:27:50.425 may 25: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state down administratively

  * 08:27:50.438 may 25: % PARSER-4-BADCFG: unexpected end of the configuration file.

  I searched the difference in regulatory areas between AIR-LAP1041N -E- K9 and AIR-LAP1041N -A- K9 and no difference was found which may affect the operation of this access point.
  to cite our WLC configuration for regulatory areas is:
  Country set AR codes

   

  Area of regulation 802. 11A:-A

  802.11bg:-a

  My question is should I just include my country in the WLC (IQ) add the field of requlatry (-E) to solve this problem? or change the country will affect the operation of all APs workers?

  Appreciate your kind support,

  Patrick Q.

  Try adding a European country to your regulatory domain.

• Unable to join the domain "DNS name does not exist."

  Working on this computer remotely in my company, it has more a problem but at this moment, that we focus on trying to reach the area. We removed everything first to see if it would fix the trust relationship issues she felt the long side not being able to browse the files all computer network or servers.
  When trying to join the field, that's what we get in the dcdiag.txt in the debug folder.
  The domain name 'xxxxx' can be a NetBIOS domain name.  If this is the case, check that the domain name is properly registered with WINS.
  If you are certain that the name is not a NetBIOS domain name, then the following information can help you troubleshoot your DNS configuration.
  The following error occurred when DNS was questioned about the resource record (SRV) service location used to locate an Active Directory (AD DC) domain controller for the domain "xxxxx":
  The error was: "the DNS name does not exist."
  (0x0000232B RCODE_NAME_ERROR error code)
  The query was for the SRV record for _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.xxxxx
  Common causes of this error are:
  -The DNS SRV records to locate an AD DC for the domain are not registered in DNS. These records are automatically saved with a DNS server when an AD domain controller is added to a domain. They are updated by the AD DC at set intervals. This computer is configured to use DNS servers with the following IP addresses:
  198.6.1.5
  198.6.100.38
  -One or more of the following areas do not include delegation to its child zone:
  XXXXX
  . (the root zone)
  XXXXX = domain
  Also the listed IP addresses have been changed.
  
  
  I worked on this computer for about 2 days, and then the user is able to work remotely with a server terminal server, they will need access to the server later.

  Reset the network device - completely.  Uninstall the network driver and have someone there install the latest manufacturer.

  Manually enter the DNS information for the DNS servers of your company on the computer - even if it uses DHCP.

  Make sure that its time/time zone is the same as your DNS server.

  Reset all default HOSTS file.

  Ping the DNS server.

  When you join - use the FQDN (mycompany.local, etc..)

• Cisco WLC 2504 internal DHCP does not work properly

  Hi all

  I m trials with a Cisco WLC 2504 and some APs of 1832. I set up a DHCP scope on the interface of the controller with 2

  a large number of different configurations, but the DHCP protocol does not work and Don t Access Point to obtain an IP address. My first question: is it possible to do DHCP for Access Points or only for wireless clients?

  These are my interfaces:

  Interfaces

  

  Interface of the PA-Manager:

  Interfaces1

  

  Interfaces2

  

  My DHCP scope:

  Scope1 DHCP

  

  Portee2 DHCP

  

  Advanced DHCP:

  DHCP Scope3

  

  I forgot something? Is there anyone using DHCP for its access points?

  Thank you!

  Hello

  On Cisco WLC internal DHCP, you can add the option 43 to say where APs must register. In this case, they will try to resolve the DNS CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER or CISCO-LWAPP entry.

  Let me explain briefly how AP-Manager works on WLC:

  1. Boots of Access Point and sends a discovery request to the management interface of the controller using the intellectual property you configured as DHCP Option 43 (as described above, it can be resolved by the DNS entry)
  2. Controller, sends it a response discovered that contains the name of the system, addresses AP-Manager, the number of access points already connected to each interface AP-Manager and the overall capacity of the controller.
  3. Joints access point controller using the less loaded interface AP Manager.

  With this, every AP Manager must have a good configured interface and be connected to a different port, no LAG.

  I drop a post here sometimes there is which might help:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/118311/configuring-multiple-AP-...

  Thank you

  PS: Please do not forget to rate and score as correct answer if this answered your question