AP1231G SSID broadcasts do not [config posted]

I recently bought a set of access points AP1231G that have been pre-configured as root and nonroot bridges. Initially, I couldn't have a SSID will be displayed, thinking that I may have missed something that has been preconfigured I wiped the config and started from scratch. I went through several guides configuration to enable WPA with open authentication, but have had no success with the SSID is broadcast, and still less connecting to the AP.

Any help is greatly appreciated. Config below:

version 12.3
no service button
horodateurs service debug datetime msec
Log service timestamps datetime msec
encryption password service
!
host ap name
!
enable secret 5 $1$ lgoW$ zk7dfGkGLlZiOQuRFsxfV.
!
IP subnet zero
!
!
No aaa new-model
dot11 syslog
!
dot11 ssid MW2
open authentication
authentication wpa key management
Comments-mode
WPA - psk ascii 7 02050D4808090C285F4D06
!
!
!
username password Cisco 7 02250D 480809
!
Bridge IRB
!
!
interface Dot11Radio0
no ip address
no ip route cache
!
encryption ciphers aes - ccm mode
!
SSID MW2
!
base speed - 1.0 2.0 basic basic-5, 5 6.0 9.0 basic-11, 0 12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0
root of station-role
Bridge-Group 1
Bridge-group subscriber-loop-control 1
Bridge-Group 1 block-unknown-source
No source of bridge-Group 1-learning
unicast bridge-Group 1-floods
Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people
!
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route cache
automatic duplex
automatic speed
Bridge-Group 1
No source of bridge-Group 1-learning
Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people
!
interface BVI1
IP 10.81.220.5 255.255.255.0
no ip route cache
!
IP http server
no ip http secure server
IP http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
!
output of the TFTP server
1 channel ip bridge
!
!
!
Line con 0
line vty 0 4
local connection
!
end

the antennas are connected?

Concerning

Surendra

Tags: Cisco Wireless

Similar Questions

  • Printer Hp6700: unable to connect to the router wireless D - Link DI-514 when SSID Broadcast is set to no.

    HP6700 printer: unable to connect to the router wireless D - Link DI-514 when the router Broadcast SSID is set to no. My MAC laptop and HP laptop both work with the set SSID on no. If I change the router Wireless SSID Broadcast is YES, then the printer HP6700 can connect to the wireless router. I set up the printer it saying that the SSID and password have been, the same as both of my laptops, but it connects ever, unless I have change the router to broadcast the SSID. Help!

    Have you tried to update the firmware on the DI-514?

    You can also try to set a static IP address on the printer, and then assign the printer to the list of DHCP static in the interface of the router.
    To give a static IP address to your printer:
    -Print a the front of the printer Network Setup Page. Note the IP address of the printer.
    -Enter the IP address in a browser to reveal the internal settings of the printer.
    -Choose the network tab, then wireless along the left side, then on the IPv4 tab.
    -On this screen, you want to set a manual IP address. You must assign an IP address outside the range that the router sets automatically (called the DHCP range). If you do not know the range, change the last set of numbers (those after the last '.') 250
    -Apply the subnet 255.255.255.0 (unless you know it's different, if so, use it)
    -Enter the IP of your router (on the Page of the Network Config) for the gateway.
    -Enter for the first DNS 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 for second DNS. It's Google DNS. You can choose a different external DNS if you wish.
    -Click 'apply '.
    Now, stop the router and printer, start the router, wait, and then start printing.

    After that you remove and re - add the printer to your Mac.

    Show support by clicking on the blue Kudos star in the post that solved your problem. Doing so will help the other members of the forum their solutions also.

  • Unable to connect via wireless with SSID broadcast disabled

    I want to configure my router for my SSID is not broadcast, because I think it's a logical step to take for increased security. I have not been able to do since I started using my new laptop Inspiron 5558. I tried this several times and every time I turn off the SSID broadcast, I am not able to connect to the Wi - Fi on this laptop. Other remote computers in my house and my smartphone connect without problem, but nothing I've tried helps my new computer Dell laptop to connect via Wi - Fi, except for allowing the SSID broadcast.

    I have a router Actiontec MI424WR reverend E. I have installed the new driver and the Intel PROset utility and unfortunately nothing has changed. I went to the settings to investigate some of the other solutions offers, and I came across something that seems to have solved my problem. What I found in SETTINGS/network & Internet/change adapter options/Wi-Fi/see the status of my properties of connection/Wireless / on the connection tab, it was an uncontrolled area with the words "connect even if the network is not broadcasting its name (SSID). I checked this box, and since then, I was able to connect to my network wireless with SSID broadcast disabled. I will now call this resolved and if no new problems arise. start a new post. Thanks for sticking with me on this.

    Ed J.

  • SSID broadcast

    Want a couple of opinions on the broadcast of the SSID or not. We have 200 series 1200 ap on a University campus and currently distributed only in a few areas (5%) on campus we also have cisco WLSE to manage.

    In my humble OPINION, not broadcasting the SSID is security the same way that wrap you in aluminum foil you made the bulletproof. (It is not / is not, believe me).

    A large part of the decision boils down to bandwidth management.

    For example, do not broadcast your SSID, anyone using MS Windows Zero Config Wireless will have connection problems... ZWC always will prefer a SSID broadcast, often even if you have the client 'hard-coded' to associate with a specific SSID. Expect phone calls.

    Or the other decision, I hope that you have some solid backend authentication and authorization.

    It is essentially you have something other people want to (bandwidth, potentially free band). If you're lucky, people will * only * steal bandwidth.

    In the past, I think you will find that 'only' bandwidth theft is not enough, you will get some hotshot King or kiddie-script, or spammer, porn that will do malicious things in and on your network (if you are broadcasting your SSID or not.. Word bypass).

    Convenience for users and reduce the ' my laptop does not connect to your wireless system (it tries to connect to rogue AP from some students or other hotspot) calls. "

    Also keep them my mind is that if you don't broadcast your SSID, unlike someone else (malicious) (advertise * your * SSID)... they can usurp the user and capture traffic... or at least it makes it much easier to perform a man-in-the-middle attack (do a search for "ettercap").

    Advertise your SSID and have a good system of auth/auth on the back-end. Everything in the newspaper and be vigilant. Have a plan (and a strong policy) to deal with attackers and did not hesitate to run it.

    It is worth a few days of discussion, around this topic and a variety of opinions each valid in a given context. You must weigh the consumers against the administration, against the risk, compared to the budget... and a dozen other variables.

    (In general), there is no single best answer for most scenarios.

    That's why a good designer / architect system pulls down the fortunes and worth ever penny.

    Good luck

    Scott

  • On remote access points SSID broadcast

    I'm deploying a Uniified Wireless Communication network that spans two location (Head Office and branch) using 1xWLC 4402 and 13 x 1252 APs. Is it possible to configure the access points to the branch to broadcast the ssid, which would not be released on the APs on the WLC seat.

    Thank you

    OLA

    Hi, you could use "overwrite WLAN' to do.

    Here the necessary instructions... to search "To substitute WLAN" in the document to get good paragraph...

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/wireless/controller/4.0/Configuration/Guide/c40wlan.html#wp1089232

  • How can I fix the screen because everything is horizontal and not vertical poster?

    How can I fix the screen because everything is horizontal and not vertical poster?

    Hello

    Please tr

    1. Press and hold Ctrl + Al bot
    2. Press the enemy (left or right because I do not know what sense on your screen)

    Hope this helps

  • EA6300 SSID Broadcast

    How can I disable the ssid broadcast?

    I can't find it on my EA6500, and it might be the same for all routers Linksys EA. I found this link which explains why he is no longer available.

  • Disable the SSID broadcast

    I have a v1 WRT610N router and cannot find where I'm able to disable the SSID broadcast.  I thought I had looked at all the settings screens, but I can't.   can someone tell me how to disable the SSID broadcast for this router?  Thank you!

    Click on wireless on top and it should show these two things

    (On the red circles)

  • Help: wet610n will not connect to wrt610n when the ssid broadcast is disabled

    I have a wet610n wirteless bridge linking very well with my router wrt610n broadcast ssid is enabled on the router, but when I turn it off then (the rest unchanged), the wet610n can not connect.

    What I am doing wrong?

    Or require the wet610n ssid will be broadcast (I didn't read that anywhere)?

    Thank you

    I have power cycled it, but I tried again and then experienced little more after you reset the wet610n and reconfiguring again.

    What seems to work, is to allow the broadcast of the SSID of the router and leaving the wet610n bridge wireless connection. So I can turn off the broadcast of the SSID and power cycle the wet610n and it can then connect.

    Without the first activation of SSID and connected, the bridge connects wireless.

    Thank you - it is "resolved".

  • EA2700 disable SSID broadcast

    I am the latest firmware of the EA2700, but why I can not find it is turn off the broadcast SSID function?

    In the broadcast SSID router configuration is no longer an option in Linksys Smart Wi - Fi routers. Because there are different software for wifi analyzers, network whose SSID are hidden, yet be detected and seen by these software.

    Learn more why linksys decided to remove this option, please see this link:

    Title: where can I disable Broadcasting SSID in Linksys Smart Wi - Fi account?

    ID article: 25811

  • Directed broadcasting does not

    I am trying to configure broadcasting to another network segment.  He has worked in the past, but since modernize us technologies (from unix to Windows platforms), it does not work.

    Basically, I want the UDP traffic on port 3000 which comes from the IP 172.20.1.4/16 to be received by the host 192.168.25.107.  The two are connected directly to a router in 1941.

    I tried many configuration changes, without success.  Here is my current setup:

    interface GigabitEthernet0/0
    IP 172.20.1.1 255.255.0.0
    IP broadcast directed to 103
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    No cdp enable
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    IP 192.168.250.40 255.255.255.0
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    No cdp enable
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
    IP 192.168.25.1 255.255.255.0
    IP access-group 102 to
    IP helper 172.20.1.4
    IP broadcast directed to 103
    IP accounting output-packets
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    No cdp enable
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1/0
    IP 192.168.102.1 255.255.255.0
    IP access-group 109 to
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    No cdp enable
    !
    IP forward-Protocol ND
    IP in avant-protocole udp 3000
    !
    no ip address of the http server
    no ip http secure server
    !
    Driving IP profile
    !
    access-list 101 permit tcp 10.2.0.97 host any eq 3310
    access-list 101 permit udp host 10.2.0.97 any eq 3310
    access-list 101 permit icmp any one
    access-list 101 deny ip any one
    access-list 102 permit udp 192.168.25.0 0.0.0.255 any eq 3000
    access-list 102 permit icmp any one
    access-list 102 deny ip any one
    access-list 103 allow host 172.20.1.4 udp any eq 3000
    access-list 108 allow host 192.168.101.10 udp any eq 3320
    access-list 108 allow the host tcp 192.168.101.10 any eq 3320
    access-list 108 allow icmp a whole
    108 refuse a whole ip access-list
    access-list 109 allow host 192.168.102.10 udp any eq 3320
    access-list 109 allow the host tcp 192.168.102.10 any eq 3320
    access-list 109 allow icmp a whole
    109 refuse a whole ip access-list
    access ip-list 120 allow a whole
    access-list 122 allow udp 192.168.25.0 0.0.0.255 any eq 3000
    access-list 122 allow icmp a whole
    access-list 123 permit udp host 172.20.1.4 any eq 3000
    access-list 133 allow host ip 172.20.1.4 192.168.25.0 0.0.0.255
    not run cdp
    !
    !
    !
    control plan
    !
    !
    !
    !
    end

    Any ideas?

    You're definitely on the right track, and most of your config is ok. To support what you are trying to do with directed broadcast, you need three things in your config:

    (1) you need the ip forward-Protocol udp 3000

    (2) you need the IP helper to pass emissions

    (3) you need the ip directed broadcast to allow the transfer of emissions.

    The biggest problem is that your support address is on the wrong interface and it specifies the wrong address. Support address is configured on the interface where the emissions will be from. In your case, it would be Gig0/0 and not Gig0/0/0. Support address also specifies when the broadcast would be passed and in your case, that would be 192.168.25.255. If solve you the problem, then directed broadcast should work.

    I see you have some ip directed broadcast to the configured Gig0/0. You don't need it there. It does no harm to have it, but it isn't good either. directed broadcast is needed only on interfaces that will receive the directed broadcast and must transfer the package as a local broadcast.

    HTH

    Rick

  • Cisco 5508 wlc mesh SSID broadcast?

    Hello

    I feel a strange phenomenon in my environment. Users on computers laptops Windows seem to be trying to connect to the SSID, they see the arrival of an access point which is mode bridge (and not broadcasting an SSID). I confirmed that nothing weird happens where the bridge would be broadcast SSID (standing right next to the newly imaged bridge on a laptop and when I connect I continue straight to a properly configured flexconnect AP).

    There is no output from the path of the box in Windows to tell the operating system that an access point is not valid once he thinks he is, so I'm reaching out to the community to see if someone else has seen this before. My next troubleshooting step is to bridges in stand-alone mode, if I can't find an answer.

    The environment consists of a WLC HA pair, standard 5508 flexconnect environment internal wireless, and we have a pair of bridge linking the two buildings. The affected computers are Windows 7 and Windows 8

    Hello

    Are you sure the mesh, access point is not configured to announce the WLAN of concern?

    Unless it is in a group of AP with no WLAN, WLAN 1-16 will be announced via its interface 2.4 ghz (and 5 GHz so "mesh access customer backhaul" is enabled).

    Here's a controller cli command to confirm (1550 is the AP name) ("site name" is the ap group)

    (jk-4400-111) > show ap WiFi 802. 11 b 1550

    Site Name........................................ 1550
    Site description...

    WLAN ID BSSID Interface
    -------         -----------        --------------------------
    18 management 88:f0:77:b7:b2:20
    management 88:F0:77:B7:B2:21 19

  • Resound LiNX2 961 - to broadcast or not...?

    I get my new (first time) the LiNX2 961 hearing next week and do my homework. Those of you with loss simple age-related hearing (moderate loss to gradually of frequencies) can help me wrap my head around a fundamental question continuously. When, if ever, I would want to broadcast?

    For example, my wife and I love action films, but when the TV volume is lower I continue to ask what someone said.  What is resolved by setting up a TV unit Stream 2 as a solution to have to increase the volume to hear the conversations and then lower the volume for high action scenes, top, down, up, down? Or my hearing aids that will correct without the need of flow?

    The context of the question includes where I sometimes wear a headset or headphones to listen to the audio stream without disturbing others nearby, such as watching a Netflix movie, while my wife is reading.  It seemed that interested only in spreading to this end, rather than to address any age-related hearing loss.  I don't know the streaming is used for other purposes.

    How the rest of you will find streaming useful or important?

    I have the TV streamer that sells sounding, and it works extremely well.  The sound quality is like putting on a very expensive pair of studio headphones... the voices are clear, the soundtrack is rich and sound, and you get this feeling "That I heard this in the middle of my head".  On my TV installation, the 'Chamber' volume-level from the TV speakers is always controlled by the remote, while the volume of the thing resonate TV is controlled on my iPhone.  For example, your spouse may set its own level of comfort (strong, soft, silent, whatever) and it is not related to the volume you hear in your AP. And sound level the same goes for the AP: you can cut your AP and it does not affect anyone who has another ability to hear the TV.

    Now on your iPhone, you don't have to go to the 'all around' affecting "TV-mini mic" in order to hear the TV thing, but it's just a button, so no big deal.

    Also, I need is no longer the subtitles on TV, which makes me a most popular guy.

  • Satellite S955 starts not to POST and black screen

    Hello

    I have a problem with my s955 (14 months). He is not able to start more. When turned on, I hear only the cooling fan spins up and down and nothing more. The last time, it took almost half an hour to work around this failure. When turned on it shows no problem at all. When you stop it is better to pray. It now seems to be missing. After an hour, I see no sign of life except cooling fan activity.

    I went through all the stuff mentioned in another forum of Toshiba as turned off, remove the battery, keep and maintain the power button for at least 60 seconds. I even replaced the RTC internal Li - ion, but without success. Because it is not covered by warranty more I opened it. No sign of didn't burn except a suspicious oxidation of some contacts.

    I contacted Toshiba Italy (even if it is a U.S. model.) and I expect a possible answer next week. I ran out of the possible solution except replacement of mobo. Is there anyone around who has the same problem? Could you please give me a help?
    Thank you and best regards

    Pyder

    Hi, not Toshiba Italy news but I found a Toshiba authorized service workshop that may solve this problem. It seems that, beyond other speculations, the problem may be issued by the fuse of power mainboard (read this answer interesting of maxtek73 [http://forums.toshiba.com/t5/Batteries-and-Power/My-Toshiba-Satellite-Laptop-Will-Not-Turn-On/m-p/584008#M11147] at the end of the post). It seems reasonable. In fact, keyboard, dvd player, charge battery, hd, and cooling fan are powered by the motherboard. It seems that there is not enough current to pass initial tests before POST. This could explain why the cooling fan trying to run at maximum speed, but he can't. I had to remind that to turn on, no equipment TI push fans at max speed and then slow down to normal speed before entering the POST process. I'll have a conversation with the technician of the workshop and I'll keep you in the loop.
    Best regards
    Pyder

  • Will only mirror 2 views will not extend poster in 10.10.5

    I have the latest Mac Air with 2 monitors of Garland of Dell U2414H. It reflects only every monitor that is pretty useless. It will not extend the poster. The Layout tab shows also the 2 monitors of different sizes when the settings are the same for each.

    The worst part is that they will reflect only when I chose to expand.

    Same situation with my MBA from 2015.  I have 2 screens Dell U2414, two who supported the MST and DP 1.2

    I can't get their mirror, they won't have the Garland.  I also tried to connect to my MBP 2014 with the same result. The only way I could extend the poster was to connect each monitor port thunderbolt/display on my MBP. Of course, it won't work with my MBA because there is only a single port TB.  I know the only other autour work would be to run a display on the port of TB and another a USB port with an adapter, which, in my opinion, is a terrible solution there is a USB port and not a mess on my desk.  Everything I've read, this is a limitation of Mac OS X, not a hardware problem. I run Parallels with a Windows VM on my MBA and he sees both displays fine with wreath using the port of TB on my MBA.  What gives Apple? Why intentionally block monitors third-party DP working with OS X?  Frustrating.  The other frustrating thing is that there is no work around what I see-

Maybe you are looking for