Assign the level of privilege by RADIUS

Similar Questions

• level of privilege with ACS

  I am trying to set up a group of users for read only access on our equipment (routers and switches) and specifically display run or show beginning. I put the set command to allow these 2 commands and I created a rule for this group, but it does not work as you wish.

  any ideas?  Thank you.

  There are two ways that you can accomplish what you want to do.  What you need to remember, is that when showing the running-config, you can see what you have permission to configure so just of allowing it to user RO run the show run command won't show them much.

  One thing you could do is to lower the level of privilege required to run the command "view configuration".  The command is 'privilege exec level 1 see the configuration' and must be applied to all your devices.  This would allow privileges users of level 1 display the startup-config, but not the running-config.

  Since you run ACS another solution would be to create a rule to allow these RO users to connect and actually allow to level 15, which, by default, allows to configure everything (remember to be able to see in the running-config you must have permission to configure).  Then create a set of limit orders that only allows the commands they need to use.

  Hope this helps,

  Greg

• Level of privilege of the ACS and sets of commands

  Hi all

  I was in charge of the implementation of 5.6 ACS in order to allow members of the groups of domain security MS Access of specific order to our equipment. I the area association and groups added, I have an access policy with a rule that works so my field trial account can connect to the switch and perform only the commands in my command set.

  The problem is that when I assign a Shell profile with privilege level 7 min/max to the rule and the user logs on with this level, they are unable to see the commands that I welcomed in the Set command. Is it possible to have the ACS to say IOS to automatically change the visible commands to a specific privilege level when the user connects, even if they are not at this level of privilege?

  Any help greatly appreciated,

  Chris Menuey

  Because you're using command authorization and restrict the user to some orders, why do we use privilege 7 and not 15?

  ~ Jousset

• Information on the costs at the level of the assignment

  Please give the name of the API that insert data on costs (cost Code) at the level of the assignment for quantity data in bulk

  Initialize you your session before you run the API?

  
  alter session set nls_language = 'AMERICAN' ;
  
  begin
   apps.fnd_global.apps_initialize(12447,20536,800);  -- user_id, responsibility_id, application_id
   end;
  
  INSERT into fnd_sessions
             (session_id, effective_date)
  SELECT userenv('sessionid'), sysdate
     FROM sys.dual;
  

  You see all the data in the tables for your assignment-

  
  PAY_COST_ALLOCATIONS_F
  PAY_COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX 
  

  See you soon,.
  Vignesh

• The user's privileges are not be correct.

  Probably about six or seven months ago a few changes have taken place in my system that causes the user's privileges in newly created records files to create one or the other a very low (or nonexistent) level.

  My system has two user established ID: default Administrator (1) which has been renamed "bossman") and 2) Gary (determined at the time of installing OS).  Two of these user accounts have (at least they seem to have) full control system privileges.  It seems that all the folder/file access privileges CAN be established by one of these users ID; but the installation program and the simple creation of file/folder inside the ID does not automatically establish these new files/folders with full privilege rights that I expect.  This means that these newly created folders/files should be reviewed on an individual basis to establish all the privileges either of these administrator level users.

  I want to take place when a new folder/file is created or a program installed, is that the full control privileges for these two users (at least the user who creates the folder/file or install the program) are assigned privileges of full control to the folder / file (s).

  Suggestions on how to fix this annoying privilege setting ommisson would be really appreciated.

  I don't really know where to start looking for the solution to this problem.

  After re-reading your problem and do a little research and a few tests, I think you have a problem of "legacy".  Normally, creating a new file or folder within a different folder will inherit what appeared folder had permissions.  However, there is a way to disable this legacy.  When inheritance is disabled, then a new file or folder created inside a parent folder will be an amount stripped of access.  This is specified by the parameter "applies to...» "in the ACL Editor.  So all you probably need to do is go to the folder top-level parent and specify that its legacy features apply to the "This folder, subfolders and files" and check the box to "replace all permissions of child object with permissions inheritable of this object.  Change the field "applies to the" to "This folder, subfolders and files" provides future objects will inherit as well.  For a visual look at Figure 10.23 and table 10.18 on pages 634-635 at the following link.  The text also describes the legacy.

  <>http://books.google.com/books?id=8MkwSmOYi6QC&pg=PA631&lpg=PA631&dq=acl+inheritance+windows&source=bl&ots=sMfpk2Mjx-&sig=DoVuadbQYT7j1tciYWz8ol0wWGU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=OSoKUJTmL8qs2gX8qMz5Dw&ved=0CFcQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q&f=false>

  I don't have a handy WinXP machine, but it should be substantially the same as on my machine Windows7 tends in that direction:
  Right click folder-> properties-> Security-> Advanced (tab)-> change permissions-> Edit and you should see a ' applies to: "box under the name.

  This setting is quite hard to find and I congratulate you, at the same time, to find this setting...

  HTH,
  JW

• What level of privilege is necessary...

  We are looking for possibly delegate implementation AnyConnect with our Helpdesk (limited to ASDM, adding UDIDs Apple to a strategy of access.)  The question I have, is what level of privilege must be assigned, which will allow them to add the UDID and limit other changes (as much as possible)?

  You will need to set the permission of local control to the privilege level to a level between 1-15 and assign commands (for example Access-list configure, cmd in your example). Then assign your user Helpdesk names this level of privilege.

  I don't think that you can restrict the access lists they can edit - that's outside the scope of what you can do with ASDM (or cli). you will need to move to MSC or an external portal with several tools of the built-in role-based access control to get that granular.

  See this section of the ASDM Configuration Guide for more details.

• Access restriction configuration network devices with the level of the ACS 5.0 user

  Hi Experts,

  I have some configuration tasks TACAC with level of different user for all routers and switches,

  To further develop, I engineer, analyst and site engineers, so I want to configure centralized authentication with Annie tacac different levels for the various categories of network engg. Analyst, site engineer,

  can someone explain about how to proceed with ACS 5.2 and what configuration is required at the peripheral level.

  I'm particularly looking for the 5.2 acs configuration procedure.

  Looking forward to get the answer.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5.2/user/guide/policy_mod.html#wp1076053

  In "default device admin" just create authorization rules.

  They should look like "If the user/group type = site engineer, then assign the shell profile X.

  You then define the profile of shell in the elements of policy and put in there all the privileges of your engineer to site.

  And so on for the other roles

• HP50g - assign the submenu of debugging to a key in user mode

  How to assign the submenu of debugging (in Lshift/PRG/RUN) to a key?

  Thank you

  It's menu 41, so if you set < < MENU 41 > > a key, which will display the Debug menu.

  This is a very key assignment practice: < < 41 MENU DBUG > >.  It takes a program (or the name of a program) at level 1 of the battery and running the debugger on it, with the Debug menu is displayed.  I keep assigned to leftshift-wedge-PRG (i.e. keycode 42.21).

• Assign the static IP address by ISE, ASA VPN clients

  We will integrate the remote access ASA VPN service with a new 1.2 ISE.

  Authentication is performed in Active directory. After authentication, can address assigned to a specific user of VPN by ISE IP?

  This means that the same VPN user will always get the same IP address. Thank you.

  Daniel,

  You can override the IETF-RADIUS-Framed-IP-Address in the authorization policy.

  However if I may make a suggestion:

  Unless you have only a handful of users to do so, it may be appropriate to assign the address of ISE pool or perform the mapping of LDAP attributes on ASA itself.

  In the latter case, the IP addresses are kept on the server as LDAP attributes and ASA will map the IP address. You don't want to keep address IP DB in several places.

  M.

• Select orders accounting aaa for all levels of privilege?

  Here is the syntax of the command:

  AAA accounting {auth-proxy | system | network | exec | login | orders level} {default | name-list} {arrhythmic | stop only | none} group [broadcast] name of

  The accounting type 'command' must include the privilege level of the orders that you log on. How can I connect all orders?

  Consider the following example:

   aaa accounting commands 15 default start-stop group mygroup

  If I run this command will mean that command that the user runs which have a level of less than 15 privilege are not registered? Or only commands that require exactly the privilege level 15 will be connected?

  How can I connect all orders regardless of the privilege level?

  Hey red,

  If you customize the command privilege level by using the command of privilege, you can limit who commands the unit accounts for by specifying a minimum privilege level. The security apparatus does not account for orders that are below the minimum privilege level.

  The default privilege level is 0. So if you do not specify a level of privilege then all should be counted.

  You can find the details of the order to. It's good for the SAA.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/asa80/command/referenc...

  Kind regards

  Kanwal

  Note: Please check if they are useful.

• Flip sign for non members at the level of zero in the Measures dimension

  Hi Essbase gurus,

  I'm trying to convert dynamic hierarchy of measures hierarchy stored (account) to take advantage of the aggregation of the aso. This hierarchy has + and - bindings so I'll be converting all to + and assigning the UDA as FlipSign to load the data with - ve value in good standing of the load.

  lesson plan:

  NET installs no. (value = 2)

  -> No. install reconnects (value = 5)

  -> No. install disconnects (value = 7)

  New contour

  NET installs no. (value = - 2)

  -> No. install reconnects (value = 5)

  -> Not install disconnected (FlipSign UDA) responsible for value = - 7

  I am facing challenge where I have no no member of level in this hierarchy needs to be presented in the form + for users of. How can I make Net No. installs even present as previous + 2?

  You have until the tag all members you want sign flip, then create an extra dimension of 'View '.  It will contain only one stored, 'Enter' or 'Data' as it does not affect the size of your cube.  Then, you add a dynamic member with an MDX formula to return the sign of marked members.  Reorganize the dimension so that the 'flip sign' display the Member is the default if the user makes no selection, that is to say that the "sign flip" Member rolls up to the top.

  You add a very small overhead of MDX, but it should be useful if you can do your accounts any dimension of a stored hierarchy.

• 5 GB affected memory but at the level of the OS it is shows 3 GB Y?

  Dear team,

  One of the Rhel 5 32 bit VM, we assigned 5 GB of memory, but once we log and check the same at the level of the OS it shows 3 GB, need your help what is the issue /, it is showing 3 GB instead of 5 GB.

  concerning

  Mr. VMware

  Hi Mr VMware,

  Take a look at

  https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2009-December/msg00146.html

  For more information.

  Many tx

• List of dynamic members according to the level

  Hello
  
  Is there a way to create a list of dynamic member in HFM based on the account in the account hierarchy (I'm working on HFM v. 11.1.2.0)? I'm changing the order in which the accounts appear on our studio EN reports, where the total are displayed at the bottom of each detailed section (see example below).
  
  Other species
  Outstanding cheques
  (tab) Cash
  Money-markets
  Other EQ of cash.
  (tab) Cash equivalents
  (double tab) Total cash and cash equivalents
  
  
  The HFM in the order account hierarchy unlike the presentation above, simply adding members based on a flag UD translates a list in reverse order of how I want to see the report. I don't use automatic calculation in EN Studio is because I don't have only one line of data that takes in a list of member set that is based on a field UD (all members above could be labelled with UD). I couldn't realize the calculations under hierarchical with autom
  
  So, I wanted to make the reversal of the hierarchy in the creation of my lists of members. I thought that if I follow somehow the level of each member number, I could use to overthrow the hierarchy and possibly use it to conditionally format fields as well.
  
  I'd like suggestions on how to get this working or other alternatives that I can try.
  
  Thank you!

  Here's a possible solution I came up with my question. The following code creates a list of members that will add accounts in the correct order with parents appear at the bottom of each hierarchy. The code below is for the whole of the balance of the accounts, but it can be used on any other hierarchies as well.

  Void AccountUD2_BalSht()

  HS = ACC. Account.List ("BALANCE_SHEET", "[Descendants]")

  Set arguments array1 = CreateObject ('System.Collections.ArrayList')
  Define array2 = CreateObject ('System.Collections.ArrayList')
       
  ' Assignment of list in a table

  For each a1 within ACC
  HS = UD2Var. Account.UD2 (a1)
  If UD2Var = "TB_Acct".
  Array1.Add a1
  End if
  Next
  y = Array1.Count - 1

  "All members who are declared trial balance lines in the list of members in the correct order of entry
  Do
  TargetAcct = Array1 (i)
  For j = i to o
  If (i) Array1 = Array1 (j) Then

  On the other
  If HS. Account.IsDescendant (TargetAcct, Array1 (j)) then
  TargetAcct = Array1 (j)
  POS = j
  End if
  End if
  Next

  Array2.Add TargetAcct
  Array1.Remove (TargetAcct) "delete the account that has been added to the new list from the original list
  y = y - 1
  Loop While (y > 0)
       
  For each a1 of array2
  HS. AddMembertoList a1
  Next
  HS. AddMembertoList "BALANCE_SHEET".

  End Sub

  Once the list of members was in place, I used EN studio conditionally format the lines I need back. I'd appreciate any suggestions on how to code it better.

  Under the direction of: MR January 31, 2013 14:57

• Security at the level of dimension on a data form

  Hello
  
  Is there another way in Hyperion Planning to know where safety at the level of the dimension is missing when you get the following error: (except manually go to the dimensions and to check it out)
  
  "Security and/or filtering enabled a necessary dimension is not represented on the data form.
  
  Please let me know!
  ~ Hervé

  Hello
  You can export the access privileges for a faster look into it:
  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E17236_01/EPM.1112/hp_admin/ch03s09.html

  See you soon,.
  Alp

• the Oracle user privileges

  Hello
  
  is there a method or the request to know what are the privileges that we have at the level of the operating system as a dba
  
  Thank you very much

  is there a method or the request to know what are the privileges that we have at the level of the operating system as a dba

  No, DB knows little about the OS level environment.
  Access OS should work without error.