Bandwidth dedicated to endpoints

Similar Questions

• Conference TMS uses the wrong bandwidth with BBFRR

  Hi all

  I m currently faced with the following question:

  When booking a conference through TMS directly or through Outlook (with TMSXE) the bandwidth Conference when using BBFRR will be set to 1152 kbps regardless of the configured default 4096 Kbps or immersive IP broadband bandwidth in the World Conference of TMS. During a call directly to the conference expected the default bandwidth configured on the endpoint will be used. This brings me to the presumption that it has something to do with the maximum setting of IP bandwidth on each endpoint in TMS (see screenshot). You cannot change this setting because endpoint is saved to CUCM.

  TMS conference settings:

  tms_conference_setting.PNG

  

  Endpoint settings:

  tms_ip_bandwidth.PNG

  

  I have no idea where this parameter, and I hope that someone here in the field can help me fixing this problem.

  It's my current setup:

  -CUCM 10.5.2

  -TMS 14.6

  -TMSXE 4.1

  -Conductor XC3.0

  -vTPS 4.1

  -TC7.3.0 on all the endpoints (MX300G2, MX800, SX10/80)

  Thank you

  Dennis

  Looks like you hit a bug - fixed in TMS 14.6.1

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus51732

• Question of Orbi Triband

  This router will split the bandwidth incoming to do little, cut of bandwidth dedicated for each device?

  If so this will increase or decrease my overall WiFi speed?

  Marcokamoto wrote:
  This router will split the bandwidth incoming to do little, cut of bandwidth dedicated for each device?

  If so this will increase or decrease my overall WiFi speed?

  Hello

  im not sure what you're asking, but as I know there is no bandwidth limiting characteristics on the orbi until what you ask is not possible

  in fact, you won't find bandwidth real limitation of capacity on several stocks apart from cab Gargoyle firmware, asus routers firmwares also make the limitation of bandwidth on some routers, but its not available for the orbi

  Standard QOS is not the limitation of bandwidth as it is just a priority based on the demand system that can not and does not normally do what you want

  -----------------------------

  in the second part of your question what do you by improving your overall speed of WiFi? you're talking about the internet or your actual sync to the system orbi speed

  Pete

• ASA VPN on physical IP address only?

  Hello

  Is it possible to set up a virtual IP address dedicated to endpoint on ASA VPN version 8.3 and later?

  I don't want to use the physical IP address on my external interface.

  Thank you

  No problem. Mark pls kindly responded to this post like so that others may learn from your post. Thank you.

• Question about Subzones and records by proxy

  I'm tinkering with my Jabber/Movi deployment.  We are inscriptions of the transmission by proxy via VCS - E in VCS - C.

  The thing that I noticed however is that proxy records don't seem to obey our rules of subzone - they always end up in the subzone of default on VCS - C.  I use the same exact alias registering on the VCS - C internally and it goes into the subzone very well.

  When I check the proxy on VCS - C record, the alias is the same as if it was recorded directly.

  Is this expected behavior, or my subzones VCS - C would work for registration by proxy?

  Hi Nick,

  It's true! You cannot save a customer to a subarea in VCS control when registering through VCSe record proxy.

  If you try to save jabber in the subzone of the VCS control to use control of bandwidth, I suggest you to configure bandwidth limiting in your "sub-area of course' in VCS control to control the bandwidth for these endpoints registered through recording proxy.

  In general, I don't like much to the use of proxy registration, because there are some limitations, like the cash call license when jabbers on the internet ask each other.

  If there is no particular reason to use registration by proxy in your environment, I suggest you sign up on the internet directly to VCSe jabber customers.

  Concerning

  Paulo Souza

  Please note the answers and mark it as "answered" as appropriate.

• LUN with multiple IP addresses

  I have two questions actually. The first one being: I have a machine running OpenFiler with 3 iSCSI targets. This machine has two network cards with its own IP address. There are two ESX hosts. Currently in each, I added a new datastore VMFS among those LUNS and then added two more as extensions to this VMFS datastore. This is reflected on the hosts and all using only one of the IP addresses of the exploitation of SAN and openfiler Vmotion between two hosts. Could I take a host and add the LUNS through the second IP address and ESX still not see it as a shared storage for as each host could access the same LUN via treated separate IP and have still Vmotion works through them? If so, exactly how this would and would there be predictable performance/stability problems?

  Second, what sort of questions would be that we are facing if I place a second physical machine running OpenFiler and added the LUNS on this second box as extensions to the same data store? Theoretically, this should create the massive data store over two physical and accessible machines as a store of data shared by both ESX hosts. Thoughts?

  NOTE: I know that we can paste the two network cards in the SAN, but we had a lot of performance/stability problems when we had the machine running a linux distro standard with servile NIC and an NFS share as the data store. I also came across reliabillity issues when you try to bond in OpenFiler where I could access the web interface and then it would become randomly inaccessible and then later come back online and back. Whatever it is, we are witnessing a DRASTIC increase in performance on this unique nic with openfiler LUN iSCSI on any other scenario, we had Setup.

  In fact, Yes. Make sure that IP addresses are on different subnets for interfaces A and B:

  ESX-VMK1 192.168.100.5 = talk to SAN-NIC1 = 192.168.100.254
  ESX-VMK2 = 192.168.200.5 talk to SAN-NIC2 = 192.168.200.254

  Under NO circumstances should you use the same subnet for the multiple interfaces...

  If you have TWO ESX hosts, you can cross-available network cards so HostA 'prefer' subnet-1 and host b "prefer" subnet-2:

  ESX-A-VMK1 = 192.168.100.5 talk to SAN-NIC1 = 192.168.100.254 (preferably manually in the LUN path)
  ESX-B-VMK1 = 192.168.100.6 talk to SAN-NIC1 = 192.168.100.254

  and

  ESX-A-VMK2 = 192.168.200.5 talk to SAN-NIC2 = 192.168.200.254
  ESX-B-VMK2 = 192.168.200.6 talk to SAN-NIC2 = 192.168.200.254 (preferably manually in the LUN path)

  This arrangement gives you the bandwidth "dedicated" without losing the redundancy in case a card NETWORK goes down on one of the three hosts... If the subnet 1 becomes unusable (i.e. your D-Link switch dies) then a failover to the other switch will happen auto-magiquement.)

  If you find my comments useful, please assign points. Thank you.

  -Collin C. MacMillan

  SOLORI - Oriented Solution, LLC

  http://blog.Solori.NET

• From bandwidth of endpoints

  Is it possible to have all calls between a MCU and TCS use a bandwidth fixed (2 048 kbit/s), but for all calls with the MCU or TCS between other points of endpoints that are not these two devices will use a fixed bandwidth (768 Kbps).  We use of TMS and a VCS in our infrastructure.

  Examples:

  MCU <> TC - 2048 Kbps

  MCU <> end points - 768 Kbps

  TCS <> end points - 768 Kbps

  Any help to make possible would be great!  Thank you.

  Are you using a VCS? Then check for bandwidth management administrator's guide: links / pipes

  Guess who would be the best place.

  You can also have aliases of different record with different parameters of bandwidth on the TCS.

  Default call pricing on the MCU + define the TCS as the 'End Point' with 2 Mbit/s on the MCU

  and/or set a rate of default reminder on endpoints 768kbit/s or something like that.

  But I'd go with links / tubes model

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/VCs/admin_guide/Cisco_VCS_Administrator_Guide_X7-1.PDF (202 pages..)

• How can I limit the bandwidth for endpoint on the router from 1921 to mitigate impacts traffic bittorrent reviews?

  We have implemented an independent network for our wireless comments. It's an ADSL modem, enter a 1921 Cisco. I setup NAT and DHCP on the router and it is only accessible through the wireless connection. We have a connection 50Mbps and about 250 devices connected to it. Some of them use bittorrent and other file-sharing software to quickly eat bandwidth.

  Since the torrent software is adjustable to any port and cannot be blocked like this, I was wondering if there is a way to limit the bandwidth available to each device connection mitigate this.

  I put this in the Group WAN because it seemed appropriate as it performs the external connection. I know that the argument could be made for LAN, because it connects only within the corporate building and not to one of our service centers.

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Hi John,.

  I don't see anything wrong to apply a basic qos strategy, rank traffic using nbar to match with the bittorrent Protocol and other similar protocols. And then just Butterfly traffic down using a map policy.

  HTH

  Mike

• Band bandwidth SMU for FPGA chassis

  I'm specing on material for an FPGA FlexRIO system. The module FPGA and adapter, we will use has already been defined, a 7975R and a 5782. For our application, we will be streaming 2 inputs analog on a RT controller attached. From my understanding, these samples will be single precision floating point numbers, each of which is a piece of 4 bytes. Assuming that the 5782 max sampling rate is used, 250 MECH. / s, I think that I will need 2 GB/s of bandwidth on my SMU chassis.

  Here my question, then, what SMU chassis should I consider? The SMU-1082 has "up to 2 GB/s per-slot dedicated bandwidth", but it is a real or theoretical number? Normally, I would just get the next thing that high, just to be sure, but there is a significant price difference on the way to the SMU 1085, which is also much larger I need. So I would like to save space and several thousands of dollars if I could get away with a 1082. Sampling does not quite to the max modules of adaptation would be acceptable, but I would be interested to know where about my maximum sampling speed would be.

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  The 1082 has more than enough bandwidth to stream data at a time to the analog inputs of a 5782.  The 5782 has a 14 bit ADC with two channels that sample to 250 ms/s. These samples are returned as an I16 with the two least significant bits filled with zeros.

  So assuming that you transfer all I16, rather than packing the 14 bits of data, you would have the following bandwidth requirements.

  2 channels x 2 bytes/sample x 250 mega-samples per second = 1 GB/s

  The 1082 a 2 GB/s of throughput dedicated per slot. The 7975 accommodates up to 1.6 Gbps streaming. I would recommend calling chat with someone, if you are looking for a recommendation on what type of chassis to purchase, but based on the requirements of streaming that you're fine with the combo 7975 and 1082, you thought. Just make sure you get a controller which can accommodate streaming speeds you're looking for. The 8840 is a good candidate.

• How to reduce the use of bandwidth LAN?

  I want to design a relay system using two USRP of NI USRP 2922 with sample rates even as LTE standard. But there is limitation in the use of bandwidth of 1 Gbps LAN.

  I don't think you should achieve the full rate on a USRP without a link dedicated to the PC.  The protocol used is UDP between USPR and PC which can be disruped by the latency of the network and cause packets to arrive out of order or get lost.  You should also assume that, due to the effects of edge filter only 80% of the specified bandwidth is usable.  (20 MHz of bandwdith requires a rate of IQ of 25. MECH / s)  It takes a fast PC with a very high quality (we use intel) NIC to get there.  But you will need to use the driver for the NIC card manufactuer and maximize the RX and TX buffers.  So far, I realized only on desktop computers and mobile no.  I also would assume the package of 20% load, so on a 1 Gbps link, I would not expect to exceed the 800 MB/s.

  25 MS/s x (16 bit 16 bit I + q) = 800 MB/s

  You can also, in the pilot, 8-bit mode which will halve your dynamic range, but also the data rate.

  For a system like yours, you can consider to put a PC next to each usrp and install 2 network cards in each PC.  You will add the latency, but the additional computer will give you buffer against congestion and network problems.  In addition, relay is not a 'constant' streaming activity... only the RX is constant.  For TX, you can use the approach of gusts of transmission.

  Erik

• SX20 bandwidth consumption

  Hello

  I want to know the bandwidth consumption when I use it with three other SX10 SX20 Multisite on MPLS (rate set to 512).

  Consumption of bandwidth for SX20 is regardless of the total rate of calls for each endpoint that is connected to the Multisite Conference, while each SX10 will consume only what he call rate is fixed.

• Bandwidth video conferencing required

  Hello

  I have 8 sites that will make the video conference

  HQ is connected to 7 branches

  I need to calculate the bandwidth required for a video conference call between them. The telepresence server is in HQ

  So I think I'll have the bandwidth for the flow out of all sites

  I need to know how much bandwidth that will be incoming for the branches that will carry multiplexed flow coming from the bridge

  Also how much bandwidth required for HQ? What 7 incoming + outgoing 8? or how much?

  Also the following is correct?

  Full HD = 4 M

  HD = 3 M

  SD = 2 M

  And it's true that I can control the bandwidth of the output of each endpoint to be full HD, HD, SD or even 384?

  Thank you

  If you connect to each call to 4Mbps, then that's what the bandwidth will be used between the server of each endpoint and telepresence, connecting single 4Mbps will contain incoming and outgoing video.  The recommended bandwidth that I listed in my first answer, is what is suggested for the endpoints of SX and MX.

• A matter of quick video bandwidth

  Hi all

  I have a question... And hoped for clarification on the video bandwidth used by a call from VC.

  If you see the attached screenshot for recall of an end point for the call is 384 Kbps. But if you notice that the transmission (199 kbps) video and video reception (221 kb/s) which is equal to 420 Kbps which is far superior to 384 kbit/s limited to this call. This would mean that you will have to fund 384 Kbps X 2 = 768 Kbps (+ overhead) for this call on the network of the endpoint. Correct me if I'm wrong?

  It's my understanding that I read somewhere already that bandwidth is always symmetric for VC. If you need 1 MB/s download for a call, then you must also 1 MB/s upload. And that would explain why we see more then 384 Kbps for show + reception below.

  Thanks in advance...

  Kind regards

  MILIN

  No, a 384 k call needs 384 KB of bandwidth.  It is 384 k up and down at the same time, you do not add the two numbers together.

  Similar to when we talk of a network switch, a 10 MB switch port 10 MB in each direction at the same time - it is not a 20 MB switch port.

  To try to put it in an example from the physical world, imagine that the "bandwidth" is a window... you can make the light through the window, and you could also do light through it in the opposite direction.  If you a light through it in both directions at the same time, doesn't the window twice as much.

  Wayne

• VPN Client 4.8 use/needs in bandwidth

  Apologies this has answered before somewhere...

  No one knows the approximate bandwidth of 4.8 customer needs? Basically I have an internet connection of 7 MB to the dedicated address and I need to know how many concurrent VPN IPSEC users I can accommodate before having to pass the pipe.

  Kind regards

  Stuart

  Hi Stuart,

  Happy to help you.

  For the configuration and planning, you can check a useful link:

  http://Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6659/products_ios_protocol_option_home.html

  Please rate if this helped.

  Kind regards

  Daniel

• ASA 5510 VPN dedicated Internet connection

  I have a 5510 ASA with a second internet connection on his way.  I would like to have an internet connection dedicated to my VPN Site to Site traffic and the other left to manage the public internet traffic.   I know that I can do this with a static route, but today, I noticed the "tunnel" option  How exactly does the tunnel option work mode and it works better for my situation?

  Rob,

  (Simplification) "Tunnel" option tells what to do with traffic, once it has been for example inbound VPN decapsulted.

  In your case, static routes for remote tunnel endpoint + RRI points will do.

  M.

  Edit: I would advise yo forget about the end of the dynamics of peers (dynamic IP L2L or ezvpn) solutions on any interface that does not have a default route on this subject.