Block several Instance of forms

Similar Questions

• Block several Instance of the form

  Hai all,
  
  
  In forms 6i, we can block the opening of a single multiple-instance form within the same application?
  
  
  
  Kind regards
  
  Manu

  If you are inside forms one-'instance', and if you are using OPEN_FORM to navigate in the menu of other forms, then you can use FIND_FORM and GO_FORM for your condition. But that won't help if the module forms runs in a different application forms.

• My computer shows several instances of xpsp2res.dll module in System 32.

  My computer shows several instances of xpsp2res.dll module in System 32.  I found them using Norton Systemworks process Viewer.  They look identical.  Is it a kind of duplication should I eliminate?

  I think that the Microsoft Support Engineer gives you just a bunch of things to try that neither explain the 'problem' or won't help you at all.

  Depending on your installation, you can have several copies of xpsp2res.dll on your system and you should have one in your system32 folder, in the dllcache folder and perhaps many others (I'm 27) in the folder system32 on various issues under the MUI folder and different down there.  You can't have two files with the same name in the system32 folder.

  The MUI folder means "MUI" and the file contains messages XP and icons and files contain specific language XP messages.

  If you use the built in Windows search, you'll probably find a lot.  Each of them a click right, choose Properties and look at the Version and then the language.  If you are configured for English, the one in system32 should say English and others in the various MUI files will show another language in the properties/language (German, Russian, etc.).

  You will also find that you can have dozens of file xpsp1res.dll (for Service Pack 1) and dozens of files for the Service Pack 3 xpsp3res.dll, you can even have a xpsp4res.dll file in your system32 folder (even if there is no SP4 yet).

  Depends on your installation, which we know nothing since MS Answers is no problem for any information system when a new question is asked.

  I really don't see how Microsoft Support engineer 'tips' to run Disk Cleanup or the Microsoft Safety Scanner will help you at all.  It isn't even a good guess, but it has links to the KB articles.

  If you think that your system may be compromised by malicious software, I could do this:

  Download, install, update and do a full scan with these free malware detection programs:
  Malwarebytes (MMFA): http://malwarebytes.org/
  SUPERAntiSpyware: (SAS): http://www.superantispyware.com/
  They can be uninstalled later if you wish.

• Several Instances ID using unique configuration files?

  I'm working on a project that has two instances of IDS that will essentially exactly the same thing, just triggered in different ways. Given that the two instances of IDS will do exactly the same thing, we thought to use a single file fsiuser/fsisys for both instances. For now, we have set them up separately, but the files are almost identical. My question is, is it a good idea to always have a link to 1:1 to an instance ID to a set of files in the MRL fsiuser/fsisys or is - it normal to have several instances of IDS point to one set of fsiuser/fsisys if the objective of the fsiuser/fsisys is the same thing?

  So, you have on server 1, ID - A, ID - B and ID - C. For clarity, we'll call these facilities. In the terminology of the IDS, an instance is a scalable subprocesses of the IDS. You can configure an installation of start ID IDS multiple instances, which all share the same configuration.

  It sounds like you're just make change transaction ID - B WIP and ID - C, and you mentioned that TEC was in a DB, so I guess that's a real database. If these assumptions are true, then you should be fine to share configurations... but I feel like ID - B and ID - C should be merged in one installation that generates multiple instances to handle the load of transactions. Is there a particular reason that it has been implemented in this way?

  -A

• Running several instances of Win7

  Hello, this is my first post in this forum.

  I tried to do some research to make sure that I'm not something that has already been answered, but that have not yet found.

  I would use vSphere Hypervisor (free product) on a single server and run several instances/images of Win7, so that I could use it in the classroom. My hope is that by doing this I need only to maintain an image and keep up-to-date.

  My plan is to create an image, and then allow clients to connect to the server via RDP and start a Win7 desktop computer using this image. I also need to have Office 2010 installed on this desktop is going to be where my teaching is centered.

  My questions are:

  1. This product will make?
  2. How to create the image of Win7?
  3. How licensing issues are handled so that I can legitimately run up to 5 copies of this Win7 desktop computer?
  4. Any other suggestions or thoughts that I have to consider?

  Thanks in advance.

  Russ Kauk

  If you are willing to accept a slight modification, it can do.

  (1) creating an image or

  (2) you create clones of n of this image and start them

  (3) users connect via IP/hostname to each individual workstation.

  If you need to automatically configured virtual machines and management, then you have to accelerate the non-free hypervisor, vCenter and VMware View.

  Regarding the issuance of permits - you will need licenses for Windows "n", likely.

• Port and several instances of Remoting container numbers

  When dividing the container of remote access in several instances that are running specific services, you are responsible for copy PLM config files in each new location of the folder that contains remoting.  You can then change the configuration file EnvironmentSettings for each to determine which services are running under instances of remote access container by changing the setting isActive to each.

  In doing so, is it necessary to also change the port numbers in each copy of the EnvironmentVariables config file so that they are in conflict with others, even if no service within the container of remoting is running on multiple instances of the container?

  My hypothesis is that if we put a particular service "isActive" false for a given instance of the remoting container, container instance won't lock the port for this service, there is no conflict with the remote instance of the container that is running this service and listening on this port.  This seems to be the case when it is tested, but I heard that you need to change the port numbers for each instance of the container, so a final clarification would be great.

  Thank you!

  Hi Brendon,

  Yes, you are right. If the RemotingContainer service is not running, the port is not used.

• Blocked several times trying Ad cab download

  Blocked several times to try to download Acrobat Ad with the message: "close Intrnt Explr."  When closed, message is repeated to infinity... What should I do next?

  Use another browser to download.

• How to highlight several instance of a word or a sentence in Acrobat XI

  I would like to highlight several instance of a word or a phrase.  I worked with the editors, but I can't find a way to save the changes or change the highlight color using scripts.

  Thank you

  1. open the Document in Acrobat XI

  2. open the 'Comments' on your right.

  3. There are a variety of tools avaialbe to highlight, underline and add text.

• ImportREDServer.exe runs several Instances

  When I run the CS5 first it starts 8 instances of ImportREDServer.exe (see attached). Is this normal? Also, when I open my project (1200 + R3D clips), it loads a few hundred then hangs (not responding) for 30 to 60 seconds, then charge a few hundred more and so on. I don't know if they are related. However, when I open the version CS4 project in CS4, it loads a lot faster and smoother. Any thoughts?

  Data sheet:

  First 5.0.2

  Windows 7 64 bit

  6 GB OF RAM

  clocked at 1.6 GHz I7

  FireWire 800 6 TB LaCie connected through ExpressCard adapter

  

  Yes, it is normal that several instances of ImporterREDServer to start - up to one by heart of processor.

  You have a fairly small amount of RAM for a computer equipped with eight processors. If there are multiple instances of the RED importer running to load hundreds of clips RED, it will take some time, especially if these authorities are fighting for a small amount of RAM. Whenever the software fight more RAM, you experience delays, especially if the contents of the RAM, eventually exchanging hard disk.

  I have 24GO of RAM in my computer at home with the same number of processor cores you have. It's a big positive difference.

• Several areas of form with one button recording

  Hello
  
  Is it possible to have several areas of form on a single page, with a single button that validates the changes made in all parts of the form save? If so, the forms must be manual forms?
  
  If this is not possible, or a bad way to go with APEX, what are my options?
  
  I try to avoid the user having to click through many screens to enter data. Logically each section should be in another table, but I would like to group some of the sections together to reduce the number of pages, users need to navigate to.
  
  Thanks in advance for your help,
  Johnnie
  
  Published by: johnniebillings on June 1st, 2009 21:33

  OK, Johnnie - let us know if you need something more on this

  Andy

• disable unused records block several record

  Forms [64 Bit] Version 11.1.2.1.0

  I have a block of several record based on a table. The State of block properties, it can display a maximum of 5 items on screen, the only item in the block is an image placeholder, which of course is filled with images on execute_query.

  My requirement is that if the query returns only the 3 images for example, I want to disable/hide the remaining 2 placeholders.

  Is there a trigger that is fired once after the sql operation is over and all the records are retrieved? If so I could loop through the elements of the code block and disable those that are not met. I couldn't find the correct trigger however. After query fires after every record, rather than at the end of the full extraction.

  If this is not the way to do it, someone at - it any other suggestions?

  Thanks in advance.

  I don't think that there is a non-transactional trigger that triggers once the query is executed.

  I assume that you have coded a built-in execute_query somewhere in your form (I guess in the outbreak of the exeqry key). The place for what you want is just after the integrated execute_query

  There you can see get_block_property QUERY_HITS and do everything that you want to hide the uninhabited element instances.

• Showing the façade unqiue for several instances of appeal Subvi

  Hello

  I have a Subvi, which resembles a table 2D data and graphs of the plots.  I call the Subvi and he opens the subVIs Panel to display plots.  Now I would like to put the Subvi in one for a loop and call several times with various 2D charts.  I'm trying to figure out how to make multiple instances of the Subvi front panel appear. Essentially a front for each table 2D.  All I can get it to do is to open and close the user interface for each Subvi call and for the last table display the user interface for the data.

  I tried to make the VI reentrant and selected the option pre allocate the memory for each clone.  Maybe it works, but I need the front of each Subvi call to stay open.

  Thank you

  Gary

  Thank you both for the help.  I used the open VI of reference and call by reference and created a strictly typed reference VI to call the Subvi dynamically.  Is attached a screenshot of the block diagram.  The link below has guided me to created the strictly typed VI reference required by the "reference" entry of the reference function call.

  http://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361H-01/lvhowto/create_strict_type_vi_ref/

• Several instances of VI in separate threads

  Hello

  I am trying to run two instances of the same VI (with separate sequence contexts) in two separate threads. These two instances are called from two separate sequences, using a new thread for each sequence. The problem is that the instance of the VI called from the second sequence does not run as long as one has stopped. I need help to make them run in parallel, they should not be waiting for each other to finish.

  Thank you

  Chris

  Chris,

  the VI itself is executed by the runtime of LV. Therefore, if the VI is not reentrant, it will block all calls, regardless of the calls threads, if it is already running.

  According to the content of this VI, the most obvious solution is to set the "returning" VI

  Norbert

• Hi, my Norton security has blocked several attack here on my computer.

  I had several attempts to attack on my computer, my security system informs me, and when I ask for more details it gives me the IP numbers, where do I inform microsoft on these IP numbers so they can be traced. For the last two days, I had about 20 attacks. Thank you

  Tackling the system is something common, and I don't suppose that Microsoft has not yet such a thing. However, if the attack is too big then Microsoft would action and global security will follow with the Microsoft security team but action would overall not for each user. If your Norton has participate in the community or SONAR, then these IP automatically reported to Symantec, which is Norton factory, if you see your Norton History you will see something like sending of statistics and they also view the world, but attack is block which is the right thing.

  You may contact Symantec directly and discuss the issue with them that you use Norton product:

  http://us.Norton.com/support/index.jsp

  There is a Web site that could tell the location of intellectual property, but it is not entirely correct and migth give you wrong place, but it's the right place to see something:

  http://www.ipaddresslocation.org/

  Note that it is the third-party Web site.

• VMplayer using for several instances of XP Mode.

  OK, so I used the built in Windows XP mode for about a year now, and while I'm generally pretty happy with it, I would switch to someont that is not so prone to crash.

  I have downloaded VMplayer, converted my VM, added the xpmode.enabled = true line in the .vmx files (otherwise they constantly asked me to activate) but now I get a message when I try to run two simultaneous to the virtual computer that says I am only able to run a single instance of windows XP Mode.

  Using XP mode I was not limited to a single copy, and because of what I do with them (VPN in several places at once) I need to access several simultaneous sessions.  Someone at - he found a way around this with VMplayer or am I stuck with XP Mode?

  Thank you

  Chris

  Unfortunately, Microsoft requires us to enforce their EULA in this regard.