Bluetooth process causes 100% CPU

Similar Questions

• process of LSD causing 100% cpu and beachballing

  Hi guys,.

  I hope someone can help me with this.  My computer has recently started using 100% cpu on a process called "lsd".  It totally freezes my computer and I have to hard start it again by pressing the power button.  I can force him to do it is I select a video and then choose 'Open with' as it is pulling up the following windows, it will be beachball and go to 100% cpu due to this process.

  I read something that LINC Davis had previously displayed on the console, so I went there and here's the dump for "lsd":

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.103 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.107 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.110 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.113 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.602 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.605 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.608 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.612 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.615 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.619 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:49.392 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:49.451 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:49.467 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:49.484 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:49.502 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  They are all the same, so I'm not going to post it all but there are 4,000 of them in the last twenty minutes.

  Here's my imac:

  

  Thank you very much for ANY help someone can give me

  hardtofin

  You may have a corrupted the Launch Services database.

  To reset the database:

  (1) triple - click anywhere in the following line (it's a very long line) to select; Press command-C to copy

  Ework/support/lsregister /system/library/frameworks/CoreServices.framework/frameworks/LaunchServices.fram - kill - r-domain local - domain-domain user system; Killall Dock

  (2) press open Terminal, on command-V to paste, press ENTER to execute the command

  (3) restart your mac.

• svhost.exe causing 100 cpu

  My computer is running at a snail pace because the svchost.exe uses 100% cpu ALL the time.  It's almost impossible to open and close programs.  I'm only able to use my computer if I stop the process through the Task Manager.  I would like to find a fix for this if possibel so I didn't complete the process each time I want to use the computer. O running all tests antivirus and registery scans I can think.  I thought it must be some kind of virus, but I can't find anything.  Help, please!

  You can determine exactly what causes most of the problems by following the steps below:

  Method 1: Put the computer in safe mode and see if the problem persists:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/start-your-computer-in-safe-mode

  Method 2: Clean boot

  If the problem is not repeated in safe mode, there is probably a startup item or service is causing the problem. Follow the steps on the following link to locate the item or service responsible for the error:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

  I hope this helps!

  Cody C
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• COM Bluetooth port 90-100% CPU load

  I ' am running a PC application via a COM port normal, nothing complicated 38 kbaud. The CPU load is about 4%.
  Then I try to do without this thread, that oops the CPU rises to 96% of the load.

  I use a different computer manufacturers with Toshiba stack and module internal BT. Win XP SP2. Yes I have updated to the last stack of Toshiba.

  The same problem on my second computer (since it is a dual core I get 50% CPU) also with Toshiba stack.

  If use an external RS232 Bluetooth adapter everythings works fine at 4% of CPU load. I have however to connect a USB Bluetooth, same problem 96% CPU adapter.

  I'm doing something obviously wrong?

  / B

  Each laptop manufacturer typically feature test prior to the distribution of laptops. Have you tried to know what say the support from the manufacturer of this problem?

  I use for Toshiba laptop and BT works well and something like that doesn't happen to me.

• Recently FireFox often caused 100% CPU usage and locks until it finishes the process (the different). Clear the cookies/cache did not help. Any ideas?

  Windows 2000 SP4, 1 g RAM, Firefox version 9.0.1
  We keep IE6 and Firefox open simultaneously to 2 different email accounts. Firefox has always been much faster even with 3 or 4 tabs open, but for the past few weeks trying to update a screen suddenly CPU goes to 100% usage and of course nothing will move until the process is complete. Close one or more tabs does not help. If I close Firefox completely using the task processor Manager goes back down to zero. After restarting Firefox CPU use may or may not go back to the top as he tries to continue the previous task which has been lock him up.
  He did this with Firefox 3.6, but still it did not happen immediately after the 9.0.1 update either.

  Hi vbolton,

  Have you looked at the Knowledge Base article Firefox using too much memory (RAM) - how to fix the or Firefox using too many resources CPU - how to fix? There is a lot of information in there.

  Hope this helps!

• wifitask.exe causing 100% CPU use

  I use Windows 10 and realized that my computer is very slow. I tried to use flash for a meeting and it was so slow it wouldn't load. I checked Task Manager and noticed that my CPU is at 100% usage. I ended up most processes that were not required to run windows nothing helped, but when I closed wifitask.exe, the CPU would go from 30 to 80%. However, after a short time, wifitask.exe causes somehow himself to run and CPU usage was 100%. What exactly does wifitask.exe do? I can remove it or do I have to reinstall something? I also noticed that svchost.exe and lsass.exe use about 25% CPU each but what I've seen, that's normal? wifitask.exe shows that it only uses about 15%, but it's the only thing that removes the CPU usage when I finish it.

  Any help/suggestions would be appreciated. I have worked on this all night and to meet soon. Thanks in advance.

  Computer

  Acer Aspire 5517

  TR

  Defender (MSE) is by far the cause.  It is using 45 + % CPU and is also the largest process of writing the disk.  Because it is part of the OS, you can not uninstall & re-install so your options are limited.  You can install an app different malware that automatically turn off MSE

  There is evidence (on earlier systems) that restricting directories Defender scans can reduce this effect, but I can't find any reference to win 10.

  If you decide to change applications malware ESET (eset smart security) and AVG seems to work without any problem in 10122

  

• Svchost.exe causing 100% cpu usage during the update of windows, even when disconnected.

  I recently had to re - install windows xp on a new hard drive for replacement. My version of xp home edition, SP2 OEM installation disc. (This is ith group included IE6)

  Once installed and running, could access windows update.

  Read all the threads associated etc. and installed SP3, disc after downloading microsoft on another pc. Installed after three trys, first two caused various mistakes, but third attempt seems OK!

  I've also updated the IE6 to IE8, as some sites obviously did not work properly with the older browser.

  Now go do the automatic updates, or log for manual updates... BUT!

  During the process, my cpu fan comes on fast and permanently! The CPU usage is showing that 100%, pc slows to crawl, the mouse becomes slow etc.

  This has never happened before on this machine before you reinstall clean, he had already automatically updated to SP3 and went very well, it was some time ago, before the failure of hard drive, and it has never had this problem!

  Only since having to do a cleaning manual update and re - install.

  The culprit seems to be svchost.exe, once it is used by the update, running the cpu at 100% and continues to do so EVEN after stopping the service, until I manually stop with the Task Manager!

  The svchost.exe instance showing a high is use: SYSTEM.

  According to the files of help here, it is a known issue and a fix KB927891 was issued for SP2, but this should NOT be necessary for SP3, and in fact difficulty used to perform anyway under SP3!

  Ideas for a guy to fix?

  I appreciate the support for XP runs out quickly, and after this update of windows will be redundant, but in the meantime it is always useful!

  Also if I turn off the automatic updates, how can I stop this annoying popup warning bubble?... I can't live without updating, but this bubble nag drives you nuts! :)

  OK just a update, now running cool and 100% auto update and manual update... How? I hear you ask...

  Well I had a beer and a reflection and came to the conclusion, it must be 'order' in which I updated the clean installation of XP.

  Origin, I loaded the old OEM disc new hard disk, loaded the drivers etc, then stop at windows update for updated files.

  Who told me my old incompatible browser and suggested an upgrade.

  I downloaded and installed IE8... still no joy, reading the forums comments I downloaded and installed SP3... which SEEMED to work, BUT then all the hassle of cpu to 100% with the automatic update and updated manual on the windows don't update site!

  So I just gritted my teeth, formatted the drive, another OEM of XP Home Edition SP2 installation loaded the drivers, installed a copy saved to SP3 and after restarting, THEN installed a saved copy of IE8 and THEN trotted off the coast to the windows update site... low and behold, it the connection without problem, did a search, and required updates appeared on the screen without delay all 123 of them...! :)

  Did the updates, restarted and everything was fine, updates automatic in market and left the machine, after about 30 minutes appears the yellow shield, and it downloads a couple more update files without problem.

  All this time I followed the via the Task Manager CPU usage and the strange spike waited 100% apartment, it was on average from 5 to 20%!...so a great improvement has this effect, by simply changing the order of the updates installed from the original! SP3 IE before IE8.

  May not work for all have to do a clean install because of the HD failed, but its worked for me, and I am once more a "happy bunny!

  Dave was soon.

• doc2text process using 100% cpu for a long

  I have encountered this problem before and never received a satisfactory solution.
  
  When we publish some PDF documents via collab in KD, doc2text process on our servers portals (also our API) turn at 100% of the CPU for about 90 seconds. This causes the publication of collab to fail, so we resort to directly download the file to the KD via downloading content.
  
  (1) why doc2text works on our servers of portal in the first place? Is this a result of the service portal server or api? If I move the API service off the coast to another machine, which will remove that pig of our front end servers CPU?
  
  (2) has anyone seen this before, or found a way around it? Y at - it a newer version of doc2text in gR 10, 3 that is not so terrible?
  
  I'm about to move to 1 - cpu virtual in our new environment, so any process that takes up 100% of the CPU will kill performance.

  Joel,

  Collab makes an IDK call to publish the document, so it does not hit the API service. For this reason, I propose the wide API service to another server so that the portal is not affected.

  HTH,
  -Verhee

• Ghostery addon causes 100% CPU load on a carrot for a few seconds for each hyperlink that you clicked.

  For many months now and with several versions of Firefox and firefox profiles, turning the Ghostery add-on causes each hyperlink clicked to have 2 second break. In the Task Manager, I see 25% cpu usage, which equals 100% of CPU on my Quad Core cpu load.

  If I disable Ghostery and restart Firefox, all problems disappear. So I have either the choice between a slow browser, or privacy-enabled navigation. Both are unacceptable.

  I can't find anyone with this problem; is it me?

  I did not use of Ghostery but I guess it could be the preload page and inspect and possibly break URLS to protect you before posting. Maybe if you set the settings so that it does less, allows you to balance the objectives of performance and privacy?

  I noticed this on their support site today: https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/topics/your_script_becomes_unresponsive_raising_hell_with_firefox

• VTEncoderXPCService the process using 100% CPU, slowing down of the MacBook Pro to a crawl

  I'm running OS X 10.11.4 on my mid-2009, 2.26 GHz Core 2 Duo 13 - inch MacBook Pro, updated updated to 8 GB of RAM. For these last days, a process called 'VTEncoderXPCService' has been constantly running like crazy on my Mac, using about 150% CPU. This slows down my Mac to a crawl, especially Safari, where I usually end up with beach balls every 20 to 40 seconds. I need help [figure out what is the cause, as my Mac is basically unusable because of the drop in performance.

  This is a background process that converts the video in a photo or iMovie library. If an iOS device is connected, please disconnect. In the iCloud system preferences pane, uncheck that marked Photos. The activity should stop.

• Oracle to consume 100% CPU

  Hello
  
  I'm under Oracle XE 10g on Centos 5.5. Most of the time that my database performs very well but sometimes (usually in 2-3 days), it becomes very slow. When I run 'top' on linux it shows me that the Oracle processes consumes 100% CPU.
  Can anyone suggest me please how to start to find the reason? I have doubts that some report done this but I don't know which. The application was overturned has more than 150 reports so it is difficult to find who is this? Also the processor does not become free, until I bounce the database (I tried to wait another 24 hours). In my opinion, if a report is by doing this, the processor must become free when the report is finished. I have very little knowledge about DBA.
  
  Thank you
  
  Habib

  Download statspack running on your database. The next time, the CPU hits 100%, you will be able to find the best CPU consuming queries (as appropriate).

• Svchost.exe (netsvcs) 100% cpu - update of Windows *.256 cause - update forever checks as does Defender.

  Hi, I got 100% usage cpu choking my system Toshiba laptop L300 Vista 32-bit, cause - (netsvcs) svhost.exe in time real trouble was unknown and tried everything has failed. So I did a complete new installation and fully updated to SP2 then the next update and it required me to download the latest update to terminant.256. My system is now unusable with constantly check and update svchost.exe using 100% cpu. All is well until I start to WU and I restore prior to this Windows Update Agent... Also if I close just the update it is still short in the background using 100% cpu by svchost.exe (ntsvcs) until I have manually stop the service.

  I have:

  Disabled Windows Firewall and Avast antivirus.

  I tried all the things as well in safe mode.

  Installed costs.

  Followed the instructions found on the net

  In offline mode, downloaded and installed the latest update which is the same as that.

  Whenever I have restore before this update, it works very well. The download of the update even if I have restore and install only the off-line version, it cripples even with 100% cpu and without end of audit. He made also Defender without end of audit.

  How to fix something that is a solid wall. You cannot uninstall or go around it. If I restore before it, that's all I can ever be updated Vista.

  I admit, I'm going nuts with this thing. I can't be the only one, it is 100% Windows update agent question.

  They have started to issue updates, default update clients cannot manage. Under Vista, install all the missing updates listed in the table above to this page:

  http://Wu.krelay.de/en/

  On Windows 7, install KB3172605.

  KB3172605 32-bit

  KB3172605 64-bit

  Best regards, VZ

• Modbus IO server causes cRIO CPU to go to 100%

  I have 2 e / s Modbus server set up on my cRIO-9022 system. I use Modbus ethernet to communicate. Each server is intended for a different IP address for the Modbus device to what he's talking about. Modbus devices are configured with these IP addresses.

  In normal operation, the CPU of the cRIO is about 10% use. However, I am trying to build in the correction of the mistakes of my VI. The question I have, is that when one of the modbus devices is dissconnected, the CPU usage gets locked at 100%. I guess that's because the IO server is trying to reestablish the connection and failing.

  What would be the why of the handeling this case to prevent hanging on 100% CPU?

  This is unexpected behavior that appears also when any other server I/O trying to settle the slave as well and I filed a request for Corrective Action with R & D to help resolve the issue in a future version of LabVIEW. A potential solution for those who have the DSC module is programmatically toggle the server I/O with the engine control features available in the palette of DSC.

• Process creates the CPU to overheat and the Fans to run like crazy:

  I am ripping DVDs on different Macbook cradle fully aware that it's requiring treatment.

  The 2011 with 16 GB of ram and hard disk SSD, the process runs on 330% of the processor, blasting the ability and heat

  revolves around 100 c/213 F.

  Interesting enough the same process on 2 late Mo Pro 2008 with less ram do not overheat in the extraction process. The program are identical on all the Pros of 3 MB. The processes are the same, but on the old MBpros the processor load is between 130-150% up to more heating is not that great a problem.

  But the MBPro of 2011 with top material tearing overheating of the processor and fans running at full speed.

  I noticed that too much work with other programs or is running only a few programs at the same time seem to heat from the processor and the fans make some noise + cpu run hot with my MBpro 2011 and El Capitan.

  It is possible to restrict a program that use a large part of the resources to avoid overheating?

  Other solutions?

  Well a Late 2008 Macbook Pro has a intel core 2 duo, so the max he could run is 200% (2 CPUs time 100%) if the application can do enough on 2 processors in parallel.

  Your 2011 Macbook Pro has very probably a 4 core CPU intel i7 with hyper-threading.  If an application can use hyper-fils, there is a potential of 800% max.  The 330% could just be that the DVD cannot keep up with the CPU, so it does not hit its maximum potential because of the famine of data.

  I don't know if the speed of the DVD drive in 2008 was the same as the 2011.  If the 2011 is able to read data more quickly than the 2008, then it can provide given the CPU faster, keep the much busier CPU so it can consume more power, and more power consumption more than the heat generated.

  MacBook pro 2011 ends a DVD in less time than the 2008?

  Basically, you are trying to compare 'Granny Smith' vs 'Golden Delicious' apples and expects the same taste.

  Regarding the other programs, put this SSD in your Macbook Pro means that any code or data that the application needs to get the disc are convinced order or magnitude faster, so that the application did not slow the CPU and keep crank, causing the CPU to keep them busy and thus attract more power, which is converted into heat causing fans to run.

  It is also possible that your SSD generates more heat.  Solid State does not always mean longer running costs.  Much would depend on the brand and the model of the SSD and it is the power profile, and it draws more power for writing vs readings, and how much nature more expensive power you're done.

  Information point.  I put an SSD in my 2009 27 "iMac and it works more hot because my iMac can do more in less time.  I put an SSD in my Macbook Pro 2011 and if I ask him to do a lot of work, like backups, it starts its fans, as the SSD is always quick to provide data for backup, there is no waiting for the discs, leaving the lower idle CPU.

• Satellite Pro T130 - 14L: 100% CPU use of acpi.sys after changing the HDD to SSD

  Hello

  because I changed my for one SSD HARD drive and reinstalled Windows 7 with 64 bit on this subject, my system works frequently in 100% CPU utilization caused by kernel module acpi.sys, I discovered with process Explorer and confirmed by recording an ETL file.

  This problem occurs once an hour on average, sometimes after 10 minutes of functioning of the system and sometimes after two hours, no matter which programs are running and whether or not I is actively using the computer. When I noticed a hanging and see this 100% cpu core in the process Explorer window are currently in use, I always need to save my work (which may take a few minutes) and restart the computer.

  I could live with that, but it's pretty nasty. My bios is up to date (version 2.70), as well as my other drivers (no error and no virus found). In other forums I've read, these problems could be avoided by changing the energy registers something Windows settings as never go to sleep of the SSD, but it works in my case as I disabled all energy saving options in Windows and I still have this problem.

  Is there maybe an update of the unofficial bios that could solve this problem?
  I read in another forum, that an unofficial bios update Dell fixed a similar problem on a Dell computer.

  Can someone help me solve this problem please?

  Details of process Explorer:
  The wire with TID 160 and the start address:

  ACPI. SYS + 0X1AF7C

  suddenly starts using 100% CPU and does not stop until you restart.
  Similar problem as in this forum for a Dell PC:
  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com...UM=w7itproperf

  Unlike the Dell problem, there is no appropriate-updated bios for me, could you help me if you could tell me how to stop the kernel module (if it starts hanging or even before). Then I could at least avoid frequent restarts.