COM Bluetooth port 90-100% CPU load

I ' am running a PC application via a COM port normal, nothing complicated 38 kbaud. The CPU load is about 4%.
Then I try to do without this thread, that oops the CPU rises to 96% of the load.

I use a different computer manufacturers with Toshiba stack and module internal BT. Win XP SP2. Yes I have updated to the last stack of Toshiba.

The same problem on my second computer (since it is a dual core I get 50% CPU) also with Toshiba stack.

If use an external RS232 Bluetooth adapter everythings works fine at 4% of CPU load. I have however to connect a USB Bluetooth, same problem 96% CPU adapter.

I'm doing something obviously wrong?

/ B

Each laptop manufacturer typically feature test prior to the distribution of laptops. Have you tried to know what say the support from the manufacturer of this problem?

I use for Toshiba laptop and BT works well and something like that doesn't happen to me.

Tags: Toshiba

Similar Questions

  • Ghostery addon causes 100% CPU load on a carrot for a few seconds for each hyperlink that you clicked.

    For many months now and with several versions of Firefox and firefox profiles, turning the Ghostery add-on causes each hyperlink clicked to have 2 second break. In the Task Manager, I see 25% cpu usage, which equals 100% of CPU on my Quad Core cpu load.

    If I disable Ghostery and restart Firefox, all problems disappear. So I have either the choice between a slow browser, or privacy-enabled navigation. Both are unacceptable.

    I can't find anyone with this problem; is it me?

    I did not use of Ghostery but I guess it could be the preload page and inspect and possibly break URLS to protect you before posting. Maybe if you set the settings so that it does less, allows you to balance the objectives of performance and privacy?

    I noticed this on their support site today: https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/topics/your_script_becomes_unresponsive_raising_hell_with_firefox

  • iP7220 causes dllhost.exe COM Sorrogate loop using 100% cpu

    Just bought a new iP7220 of the Amazon and installed on my Vista Home Premium 32-bit machine.  Installation has caused a massive downturn resulting in a dllhost.exe - loop of COM Surrogate that consumes 100% of my CPU, and most of my RAM.  No idea why... and what to do about it?

    Hi tfnj,

    The problem you are experiencing is especially likely with an update of Windows or the version of Internet Explorer installed on your system.  Because every system is different, we recommend to contact Microsoft for assistance with resolving this error on your system.

    You can reach Microsoft Support call 1 (800) 642-7676, or by visiting http://support.microsoft.com/ .

    It has not responded to your question or problem? Please call or write to us at one of the methods on the page contact us for further assistance.

  • Bluetooth process causes 100% CPU

    Hello

    After the installation of the battery of Toshiba BT my CPU usage is 100%.
    It seams like the process TosOBEX is the largest consumer of it.

    How can I solve this?

    Thank you!
    / Tommy

    Make sure you are using the most recent Bluetooth stack and that no other Bluetooth software is installed.
    Maybe the next thread is useful also.
    http://forums.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?MessageID=11432Ⲩ

  • BT stack file TosBTMng.Exe generates 100% of CPU load

    I am also facing the problem that the Toshiba Bluetooth Manager (TosBtMng.exe) very often starts a loop and causes a 100% CPU load.

    This has happened with older versions of the Toshiba Bluetooth stack and the current version (5.1.0.12).

    The affected system is a Tecra S1, BT-Modul and Windows XP SP2.

    BT battery installation went well and the laptop starts succesfull while BT is enabled. I also checked for hidden COM-Ports and other tips in this forum, without success.

    Blocking seems to occur at different times. Sometimes just after are restarted, by clicking on the tray icon of BT with the right button of the mouse. Then the context menu is shown all too the white box, no entries. He can also try to connect to a device already associated. If I kill the process with the Task Manager, I can restart and he continues to work for a while.

    As found in another thread here, I enabled the registration of the API of the Bluetooth Manager and found the following when connecting with the Nokia PC Suite for my mobile phone:

    Call the 00042519 21:55:05 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
    00042520 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
    00042521 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2: InitCOMPort = COM6, CreateCOMPort = COM23
    00042522 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000036 (54)
    00042523 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
    00042524 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000028 (40)
    00042525 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
    00042526 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()
    00042527 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtGetLocalInfo2: entry Paramers / pLocalBtDeviceInfo = 00D9FE8C, plStatus = 00D9FE84
    00042528 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00001000 (4096), Size = 00000030 (48)
    00042529 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
    00042530 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00001000 (4096), Size = 0000003F (63)
    00042531 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
    00042532 21:56:17 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetRemoteDeviceList2()

    A new COM port is created successfully (COM23) and a few seconds later the CPU of TosBtMng load goes up to 100%, but no API calls are made. And if you wait long enough the phone are connected and data can be transferred. However, very slowly.

    Probably because of the high CPU load a next port COM (COM24) will be created some time later and this process is then repeated once again:

    00042740 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
    00042741 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008007 (32775), Size = 00000041 (65)
    00042742 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
    Call the 00042743 21:56:47 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
    00042744 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
    00042745 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2: InitCOMPort = COM6, CreateCOMPort = COM24
    00042746 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000036 (54)
    00042747 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
    00042748 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000028 (40)
    00042749 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
    00042750 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetCOMMInfoList2()
    Call the 00042751 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
    00042752 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
    Call the 00042753 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
    00042754 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
    Call the 00042755 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
    00042756 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
    Call the 00042757 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
    00042758 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
    Call the 00042759 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
    00042760 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
    00042761 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()
    00042762 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()

    Maybe this allows to locate the origin of the problem CPU load of the Bluetooth Manager.

    Thank you
    Gerhard

    How your com port configuration look like?
    Please compare with the DeviceManager screenshot from the following Web site:
    http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/Bluetooth/?page=FAQ/bluetoothnotworking

  • RT FIFO results in 100% of cpu load?

    Hello

    I am trying to replace some RT-FIFO queues on a target of cRIO9074 (via LV2011), which should be fairly easy because the API is very similar for both:

    This example VI works for sure: the lower loop puts an I32 in the FIFO every 100ms, the upper loop must wait before trying to read a new element of the "timeout" (the value 50ms) FIFO. For this example the upper loop should run (roughly) 2 - 3 times for each iteration of the lower loop because of 50ms timeout.

    The problem I have is: it shows 100% cpu load and I don't understand why he says:

    Where this example VI does not burn 100% cpu load? The RTFIFORead question just the current state of the FIFO?

    Have you checked whether a time-out to > 100ms also creates 100% CPU load?

    Please note that create the FIFO provides the configuration of reading and writing for the vote against blocking. See Help for more information.

    Norbert

  • 100% high CPU load and memory usage

    Hi all

    My company bought a new appliance IPS 4510 and after initial installation, I see that the CPU load and memory is 100%. The device is not in a production network. Is this normal or there is a hardware problem? Enjoy a Counselor about it.

    Concerning

    Christine

    Hi Damien,.

    It is actually normal behavior for an IPS sensor.

    To measure the actual load of an IPS sensor, you will want to monitor the "percentage load treatment" of the analytical engine that processes all inspection processing for the sensor.

    You can view these statistics by using the command 'display the scan statistics-engine '.

    Also, the sensor running version 7.0000 E4 5,0000 E4 (or later version), you can check the load percentage value Inspection displayed by the command "Display inspection-load" in its place.

    Hope that answers your query.

    Cyril Shankar

  • Windows Update Service consume 100% of load on a kernel (Windwos 7)

    Hello

    This Monday week Windows update service (wuauserv) is constantly consuming 100% of load with one heart. The system is completely updated, all the updates are applied. I know that Windows update is generally the software kind of crap (sorry guys, but there are a lot of things to improve) and usually consumes CPU high for a long time just check the updates (installation also last very long), but this time he keeps everything simply.

    Restaring the service did not help. Restart does not help either. I tried to re - install all the com - dll, restarted the service,... nothing helps. Then I tried to apply the tool but this Fixit tool seems to be "smart" enough and starts the wuauserv service in order to detect problems--> same charge again.

    My system is Windows 7-64 and is usually very fast (Core - I 7, 2.6 GHz, 8 GB of Ram, 512 GB SSD) is NOT the PC.

    Thank you

    KE

    Some additional background information, since this topic got referenced from another site: in the case where the installer of KB3161608 returns "the update is not applicable to your computer", the sine qua non, KB3020369, is absent.

    "To apply this update, you must install [...] April 2015 maintenance battery update for Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 (KB3020369). »

    Best regards, VZ

  • How to list users oracle with the 100% CPU usage

    Hi Hussein.

    Sorry it is not really related to EBS :)

    EBS R12 (12.0.6)
    4.6 RHEL

    I see high utilization of the processor for the "frmweb" process intermittently Sometimes they show once a week.
    Here is the result of the 'top' command
    top - 17:02:38 up 132 days, 20:16,  5 users,  load average: 1.17, 1.10, 0.89
    Tasks: 523 total,   2 running, 521 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
    Cpu(s):  9.9% us,  2.8% sy,  0.0% ni, 87.4% id,  0.0% wa,  0.0% hi,  0.0% si
    Mem:   8309152k total,  8287716k used,    21436k free,     7652k buffers
    Swap: 10482308k total,  1987192k used,  8495116k free,  3741056k cached
    
      PID USER      PR  NI %CPU    TIME+  %MEM  VIRT  RES  SHR S COMMAND
    21680 appldev2  25   0  100  26:47.62  5.9 3071m 476m  14m R frmweb
    27832 root      16   0    1   0:00.41  0.0  2576 1268  780 R top
        1 root      16   0    0   2:21.02  0.0  3504  444  416 S init
    How to get this list using ps - ef or any other linux command (without using the 'top') so that I can write a cron to kill this fugue jobs everyday at midnight.


    Thank you very much

    Hello

    There are a lot of links that should be useful here. Some links are referenced below:

    UNIX command to find the CPU usage
    http://www.Cyberciti.biz/FAQ/UNIX-command-to-find-CPU-utilization/

    How to Linux CPU utilization?
    http://blogs.Oracle.com/Pranav/2009/02/how_to_find_out_cpu_utilizatio.html

    Google search for "Use of the UC Linux" and you will get many occurrences!

    BTW, why do you want to kill these processes manually? You should find out the reason, so having a high utilization of the processor rather than kill those processes.

    Note: 745711.1 - process forms (FRMWEB) consumes 100% CPU in Oracle Applications R12
    Note: 789659.1 - how to generate a stack of forms with Applications R12 Trace

    Kind regards
    Hussein

  • distnoted consume 100% cpu

    Every now and then my mbp will be completely insensitive because of a process called "distnoted" consume 100% cpu on a period of time.

    Why is this happening? Is this a virus? I have 16 GB of RAM + SSD - surely that should be record high enough to run OSX 10.11?

    The good news is that this is not a virus. This process was created by Apple and runs along the side to provide iTunes supported mobile devices. I would just try and force them to leave the application. http://www.groovypost.com/HOWTO/distnoted-exe-process-running-background-safe/

    Alternatively, you can try going here ... Step by step to fix your Mac

    Hope this helps, good luck to you.

  • Why Firefox uses 100% CPU when I am connected to eBay?

    Firefox uses 100% CPU when I connect eBay.

    Hi apdubois, it is useful to know that Flash is the problem but, as you point out, life without Flash is not very interactive.

    It is a standard orientation that addresses the most common reasons for problems of Flash in Firefox. I'm sure you've seen some of it before, but just in case:

    (1) make sure that all recorders/downloaders who interact with Flash media are as up-to-date as possible, or disable them temporarily.

    (2) disable graphics hardware acceleration in Firefox and Flash

    (A) in Firefox, uncheck the box here and restart:

    the button Firefox orange (or the Tools menu) > Options > advanced > General > "use hardware acceleration when available.

    (B) in Flash, see this article from Adobe technical support: http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/video-playback-issues.html#main_Solve_video_playback_issues

    (3) turn off protected mode (Windows Vista/7/8)

    See this article from Adobe support under the heading of 'Last resort': Adobe Forums: how to fix protected Flash Player for Firefox mode?

  • process of LSD causing 100% cpu and beachballing

    Hi guys,.

    I hope someone can help me with this.  My computer has recently started using 100% cpu on a process called "lsd".  It totally freezes my computer and I have to hard start it again by pressing the power button.  I can force him to do it is I select a video and then choose 'Open with' as it is pulling up the following windows, it will be beachball and go to 100% cpu due to this process.

    I read something that LINC Davis had previously displayed on the console, so I went there and here's the dump for "lsd":

    11/05/2016 10:51:39.103 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:39.107 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:39.110 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:39.113 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:39.602 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:39.605 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:39.608 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:39.612 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:39.615 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:39.619 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:49.392 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:49.451 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:49.467 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:49.484 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    11/05/2016 10:51:49.502 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

    They are all the same, so I'm not going to post it all but there are 4,000 of them in the last twenty minutes.

    Here's my imac:

    Thank you very much for ANY help someone can give me

    hardtofin

    You may have a corrupted the Launch Services database.

    To reset the database:

    (1) triple - click anywhere in the following line (it's a very long line) to select; Press command-C to copy

    Ework/support/lsregister /system/library/frameworks/CoreServices.framework/frameworks/LaunchServices.fram - kill - r-domain local - domain-domain user system; Killall Dock

    (2) press open Terminal, on command-V to paste, press ENTER to execute the command

    (3) restart your mac.

  • Satellite Pro T130 - 14L: 100% CPU use of acpi.sys after changing the HDD to SSD

    Hello

    because I changed my for one SSD HARD drive and reinstalled Windows 7 with 64 bit on this subject, my system works frequently in 100% CPU utilization caused by kernel module acpi.sys, I discovered with process Explorer and confirmed by recording an ETL file.

    This problem occurs once an hour on average, sometimes after 10 minutes of functioning of the system and sometimes after two hours, no matter which programs are running and whether or not I is actively using the computer. When I noticed a hanging and see this 100% cpu core in the process Explorer window are currently in use, I always need to save my work (which may take a few minutes) and restart the computer.

    I could live with that, but it's pretty nasty. My bios is up to date (version 2.70), as well as my other drivers (no error and no virus found). In other forums I've read, these problems could be avoided by changing the energy registers something Windows settings as never go to sleep of the SSD, but it works in my case as I disabled all energy saving options in Windows and I still have this problem.

    Is there maybe an update of the unofficial bios that could solve this problem?
    I read in another forum, that an unofficial bios update Dell fixed a similar problem on a Dell computer.

    Can someone help me solve this problem please?

    Details of process Explorer:
    The wire with TID 160 and the start address:

    ACPI. SYS + 0X1AF7C

    suddenly starts using 100% CPU and does not stop until you restart.
    Similar problem as in this forum for a Dell PC:
    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com...UM=w7itproperf

    Unlike the Dell problem, there is no appropriate-updated bios for me, could you help me if you could tell me how to stop the kernel module (if it starts hanging or even before). Then I could at least avoid frequent restarts.

  • The pencil of Apple requires a port light to recharge.  Does anyone know a USB male to female adapter port lighteners that would load the pencil on one device other than the iPad?

    The pencil of Apple requires a port light to recharge.  Does anyone know a USB male to female adapter port lighteners that would load the pencil on one device other than the iPad?

    Apple pencil comes with its own map of woman to woman, so you can use a standard lightning cable USb and charger to charge

    Not sure there is no 3rd party yet.

  • In the latest version of Skype's huge CPU load

    I have installed Skype on 2 different PC running Windows (freshly installed) 8. When using Skype in combination with Chrome CPU load goes up to 100% of all the minutes or more for a few seconds. It's really irritating and my not-so-rare configuration tells me that more people should have this huge problem.

    The only way to stop this behavior must close Skype. I read the topics (from 2012 and 2013) on how you can disable interaction web browser in the Skype settings, but it does not work (or more).

    Development of Skype in recent years is just tragic

    As of October 15, 2014, with the last update of Skype these amazing huge bugs seem to have been fixed after many, many months (years?). After you install the update and change nothing else on my system, Skype seems fine now. No freezes, no more huge processor and the burden of memory, leaks memory is no longer. Amazing that it took so long to get it, but hey, Microsoft can't complain now that it works.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Configure where 'Star bookmark' by default saves bookmarks.

    Is this possible? If this is not the case, how can I suggest the Mozila Firefox developers. It's the only reason why I don't use this wonderful browser.

  • Time capsule airport unplug my Airport Express and internet

    Howdy, I just brought my Airport Time Capsule of the work. I have the joint via an Ethernet cable to my extreme, both are in my basement. Upstairs, I have a set Express in place to expand the wireless. The extreme and Express worked for many years no

  • Printing via USB and wireless error

    Hi my printer is a HP deskjet 3050 a printer all-in-one. He stopped to communicate with the computers in the House when we had questions related to internet. LLA modem has been reset. I uninstalled it and reinstalled the printer drivers and I can sen

  • Corrupt FreeCell game

    My game of freecell on windows 7 is corrupted.  The third row of cards to Midway rides cards in the second row.  I uninstalled and reinstalled but it did not help.  It is a fixable problem?

  • How to change the compass of metronome?

    @Hi, someone knows how to change the compass of metronome´s? From 4/4 to 3/4 for example?