C170 and Ironport c150

Similar Questions

• ESA how to pin a specific traffic on a specific interface for mail flow?

  We have an ESA Ironport virtualized and normally he was running an interface on our DMZ, 192.168.1.200.

  On this DMZ, the firewall allows only the 10.1.1.10 to 192.168.1.200 internal mail server mail flow to and from, more obviously other traffic as DNS and web for filter updates.

  However, I would like to integrate with AD, so for this reason I had to connect to another interface on our LAN in vmware, and in config to Ironport ESA I implemented this interface on the local network of 10.1.1.200.  I have all services off the power on this interface, in order to access the web INTERFACE for spam or configuration still goes to the original interface of 192.168.1.200.

  Now, I've been able to communicate to the announcement and make an LDAP query, which is excellent, but now the incoming emails are hitting our exchange of the new 10.1.1.200 instead of the original 192.168.1.200 interface.

  When exchange sends an e-mail to, it still sends to 192.168.1.200, and Ironport addresses correctly.  But what Ironport receives by email is now send to Exchange on the new internal IP address.

  Question is can pin it so that Ironport works the 192.168.1.200 (management), the interface for all SNMP traffic?  The ONLY reason I added an internal data interface 1 is to query AD.

  Is it safe or not?

  Thank you!

  Hey Keith,.

  The details provided, I pray that ESA uses the right interface to send emails to your exchanges (192.168.1.200) instead of 10.1.1.200.

  (Assuming that the 2 interfaces, one for generally more traffic, another for only AD queries.)

  I advise you to change the following.

  GUI > System Admin > LDAP > change the LDAP interface for usage (for queries) to your new 10.1.1.200 (if you haven't already done so).

  Then, CLI > deliveryconfig

  Change the interface used for deliveries of mail to the 192.168.1.200 interface (chosen by name).

  I think that should correct the behavior.

  Kind regards

  Matthew

• IronPort C170 HELO/EHLO response

  Hi all! I would like to know if anyone can tell me where I can update the HELO/EHLO response sent to the Ironport when mail is flowing out of her. The configuration is currently Exchange 2010 using the Ironport as the smart host. When I send an email out his HELO response is the host name of the Ironport. There must be a place to change this, and if someone can point me in the right direction that would be appreciated.

  Thank you!

  Try the network > Interfaces IP, choose the interface that will outgoing mail from and the value of its host name field.

  

• Undeliverable: - Cisco C170 - 5.4.7 - delivery has expired (too old message) [default] "[Errno [54] connection reset by peer" (delivery attempts: 75)

  Users just began having problems sending e-mails of Group of 10 recipients or more towards the outside email addresses. Internal email works well. But everything goes to an external address like gmail, yahoo, hotmail and others all come back reshipped 5.4.7... They are able to send 1 at a time or a couple at a time outdoors and they cross very well. We use the Cisco Ironports C170. We have the number of retries set to 100 and time in queue 259200 seconds. We just made some updates on the Ironports... 9.5.0 - 125.

  Any help or ideas troubleshooting would be great! We are new to Ironport only one of them was about a year and so far they have been great up to this problem.

  Thank you

  Matt

  Hello Matt,

  Get the message tracking details. This is GUI > monitor > message tracking

  Find e-mail, and then click "view details".

  According to the newspapers, from what I can tell so far in the blink of an eye, it's a little like an interruption of port 25 which passes on your network, that the emails are delivered, some are arrested with soft bounce (terminals).

  From a trial of mxtoolbox, (judging by the tophosts, your internal domain name is besd.net)

  We are witnessing ESMTP inspection enabled on your firewall, we can ensure that it is disabled completely, as it is one of the main causes of the problems.

  Login to 205.121.132.141

  220 * [813 ms]
  EHLO PWS3.mxtoolbox.com
  250 astark.besd .net
  250 8BITMIME
  SIZE 250 18877239 [656 ms]
  MAIL FROM:[email protected] / * />
  250 sender [email protected] / * /> ok [656 ms]
  RCPT TO:[email protected] / * />
  550 5.1.0 # address rejected. [656 ms]

  Login to 205.121.132.143

  220 * [ms 641]
  EHLO PWS3.mxtoolbox.com
  250 afury.besd .net
  250 8BITMIME

  Thank you

  Matthew

• Objects Force10 and IP SLA monitoring

  Hello

  Can Force10 ip sla?

  Im trying to have a c150 detect a link down and change the default route to another.

  I found what I'm looking for, but its for a cisco :(

  cs_setInnerHtml ('video_5293c394 - 45 b 3-491f-88fd-864c17d00896', ");

  Sorry, the switch has no features that will work as IP SLA.

• In what order Ironport checks incoming mails / outgoing

  Hi guys,.

  I can't find any document about this one. In what order does Ironport checks / analyze / check incoming emails?

  Considoring Ironport has these controls enabled on a mail policy;

  1 anti-Spam

  2 anti-virus

  3 HAT and RAT

  4 Senderbase reputation score

  5 outbreak of filters

  6. content filters

  7 SPF

  and

  8 anti Maleware protection and file analysis.

  Why would I ask you this because someone asked me why the emails were blocked by anti-spam instead of SPF. And is it possible to block incoming emails spoofed by "own domain name but different IP address" from the outside by SPF instead of other policies? Or is it because the Ironport shall follow the order?

  Is there one better way other than creating a new policy - content SPF above default to achieve policy filters? Because I'm afraid if I create a new policy specifically for SPF above default policy and when a mail to has an SPF record checked but a virus then default policy does not have a second control and the e-mail will be sent. Am I wrong?

  Thank you all in advance

  Hello

  The pipeline of e-mail flow is explained in detail in the final user's guide Chapter 4

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/security/ESA/esa9-7/ESA_9-7_Use...

  In short the email circulation in the appliance as below

  .
  Email-> SBR-> HAT-> SPF/DKIM / DMARC-> RAT->-> anti - Spam-anti-virus-> WAP-> content-> outbreak Filters > filters, Message filters

  Please check SPF note is performed early in the pipeline, but a decision will be made only based on message/content filters created for the SPF verdict.

  An email would be analyzed by all engines except where a final decision (such as bounce, drop) is encountered. Put in quarantine is not a final act and an email would be sent only to quarantine at the end of the line of treatment after that scanning everything is finished. This is why an email with the action of the SPF filter quarantine could again until the end of the spam quarantine based on anti-spam verdict.

  You will need to determine what analysis you want to perform and to be bypassed for those emails and make changes accordingly.

  Thank you
  Libin venet

• ESA AsyncOS 7.6.2 - 014 | Address filter and invalid domain name

  Hello

  Need your help please.

  I'm having problems with my email filter device that receives e-mail invalid domain and because of my Lake of knowledge on the product it self, I need advice how I can stop this problem.

  the test I do is:

  ############################################################

  Telnet mx1.mymailserver.com

  220*****************************

  HELO malange.com

  MAIL FROM: [email protected] / * /

  250 sender [email protected] / * /> ok

  RCPT TO: [email protected] / * /

  250 container [email protected] / * /> ok

  DATA

  353 go

  aaassddfdsnfdnf

  .

  250 ok: 4206071 Message accepted

  QUIT SMOKING

  221

  ##########################################################

  I want to stop this kind of message to reach the Inbox mailbox in our Organization. need advice.

  Best regards

  Alcides Miguel

  Hello Alcides,

  Areas with no valid sending emails through, there's a feature called "sender envelope DNS audit" where it will make a DNS reverse lookup on the part of the domain of the e-mail-and if there is no valid DNS record found, he rejects the attempt to mail - in. If this feature meets your needs, you can activate it in your GUI > political Mail > overview HAT > click the policy of flow of mail (ACCEPTED, etc.) that you want to enable it for. Scroll to the bottom and you will see the DNS of the envelope sender verification and activate it.

  output would look like:

  EHLO test
  220 ironport.lab.com ESMTP
  250 ironport.lab.com
  250 8BITMIME
  SIZE 250 20971520
  mail from:[email protected] / * />
  553 #5.1.8 domain of sender address [email protected] / * /> does not exist
  ^]

  Otherwise if you want to delete the emails from a specific domain, you can run content filters to drop to the envelope sender if you do not want to accept e-mails from him.

  Kind regards

  Matthew

• IronPort license

  Hello!

  After the termination of the license for Ironport, updated the anti-spamming stops.

  I have two questions:

  1 check all incoming messages via SenderBase reputation?

  2 Will the anti spam module works with the last received an updated or anti-spam will be turned off?

  Hello, Maxim,.

  > 1. Check all incoming messages via SenderBase reputation?

  Table/sender access corresponding host always group will perform when the receiver license is perpetual (this also includes SenderBase)

  > 2. Will the anti spam module works with the last received an updated or anti-spam will be turned off?

  No, anti-Spam does not at all when the function key expires.

  Thank you and best regards,

  Martin

• CASE of unsuccessful IronPort update

  Hello

  I would like to ask a favor of you guys. I received the form of following my Ironport C160 error message.

  CASE update fails. This may be due to transient network or DNS problems,
  The proxy configuration causing HTTP errors in transmission of update or the unavailability of the configured server download.
  Is the specific error on the device for this failure: error to transfer the CASE to update directory information
  'http://downloads.ironport.com/as/case.ini': IO error open URL
  'http://downloads.ironport.com/as/case.ini?version=7.0.3-005&model=C160&serial=&t_version=3.1.0-014&e_version=3.1.0-014&has_vof=0&has_ipas=1&has_sbnp=1'.

  Thank you for your kind support and advice!

  Sincerely,

  Andrew

  Hello Andrew,.

  an alert could be triggered for each failed update, so if only a single alert saw you can assume that updated a single attempt has failed.

  In the security of GUI-> anti Spam Services, you can also consult the last attempt to download and the last successful upload (or CLI: antispamstatus). The configured update interval determines when the next update is attempted, so usually no manual intervention is necessary as the device led it on its own.

  In certain circumstances (when the network connectivity is bad or there is limited bandwidth manually) update fails permanently and the device is unable to complete an attempt to update the configured interval. This can cause anti-Spam (or anti-virus) rules obsolete and very probably happens when the new Anti-Spam/anti-virus engines are released (because they have a size higher than updates of rule and require more bandwidth to download). In this case the first step would be to change the interval to update (for testing of use) to a higher value (for example: 15 or 30 minutes) to see if the update could end up in this time interval. However, this is visible as a workaround as the cause for this is that a network-related issue that needs investigation in the network (and not on the device).

  So to make a long story short: alerts single record should be ignored (they CAN get), several of them in a short period of time should be further explored.

  Thank you and best regards,

  Martin

• Cannot relay email to internal interface on IronPort by DNS, IP only

  Hello!

  I am fairly new with IronPort, but I need to is a relay on our interface internal on the Ironport and everything works fine until I Specifies the SMTP server with the IP address rather than to our dns entry that is mailrelay.doman.corp.

  I see the traffic going by our firewall well but it doesn't work. I don't see him not in the messagetracking function, but if I simulate it in the Trace feature that works too. It's an IronPort C370.

  So to summarize:

  Mailrelay.domain.Corp = 10.10.10.10

  10.10.10.10 telnet 25<-- this="">

  Telnet Mailrelay.domain.corp 25<-- this="" does="" not="">

  Any ideas how to fix?

  Thank you!

  Hi David,

  Your C370 is able to resolve the Mailrelay.domain.corp?

  You can configure your C370 to use your server to allow your C370's internal DNS resolve this, if you do not yet.

  It would help if you could share the output of the command:

  Telnet Mailrelay.domain.corp 25

  As you say the telnet IP address works, I guess the question is associated DNS.

  Kind regards

  Valter

• IronPort SSH Keys vulnerability patch

  Hello

  customer is running WSA 8.8.0 - 085. In the web pages of upgrades available, we show the file "vulnerability cisco-sa-20150625-ironport Fix SSH Keys." When you try to apply it, web pages and the CLI, such as suggested by RN, it shows the patch as it has already applied:

  Check if "Vulnerability Cisco-Ironport SSH Keys" patch is required
  Patch 'Vulnerability cisco-Ironport SSH Keys' is already applied
  Facility upgrade is complete.

  I think it's BECAUSE WSA has been upgraded after June 25, a release already includes this patch.

  Question:

  -How can I be sure that SSH keys are ok?

  -Why the patch stay in the upgrades available? Can I delete it?

  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  Thanks for reaching out, here is the link that provide details around this:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/blog/12543046/multiple-default-SSH-keys-...

  and what is "why patch stay in available upgrades? Can I remove it? »

  This patch will be deleted once you upgrade to version 9.0.x and now cannot be "off put into service.

  Kind regards

  Zack

• Possibility to check/compare the configuration on the Ironport changes?

  Hello

  We have 2 devices of Ironport S370 and several directors of the devices.

  Does anyone know of a tool that could help us audit/compare the changes made by each Director? Replaces the political categories and custom specific URL access.

  Thank you!

  This script can help you: it creates the configuration file, it transfers by FTP and sends the diff between the latest two files from your email config:

  #! / bin/bash

  ironporthost = "192.168.42.42".
  ironportuser = "admin".
  ironportpass = "password"

  configdir = "/ home/backup/ironport.

  "emailalert ="[email protected] / * /"
  EmailSubject = "Ironport Config Diff.

  pathtosshpass = "/ usr/bin '.
  pathtossh = "/ usr/bin '.
  pathtolftp = "/ usr/bin '.
  pathtomail = "/ usr/bin '.

  # create the new configuration file
  ${pathtosshpass} / sshpass Pei ' ${ironportpass} "${pathtossh} / ssh-l ' ${ironportuser}" ${ironporthost} "saveconfig 0".

  # fetch configuration files
  CD ${configdir}
  ${pathtolftp} / lftp u ' ${ironportuser} "," ${ironportpass} "EI" mget EI/configuration / * xml & output "${ironporthost}

  # Send diff of the last 2 files
  files ='ls t *.xml | head - 2 '
  configdiff = "$files diff.

  echo ${configdiff} | ${pathtomail} / mail-s "${emailsubject}" ${emailalert}

• Need help on the centralized on C160 Cisco Ironport appliance management feature.

  Hi all

  I searched the internet but I have found no relevant article on how to enable and configure on device Cisco Ironport centralized management functionality. Here are some details:

  IronPort appliance: C160

  Centralized management of the feature license: Yes purchased

  If someone can help me with a link or article or screenshot or a document prepared by any individual will be useful.

  Thanking you in advance.

  Kind regards

  Ritesh Hegde.

  Hi Ritesh,

  Centralized management is well covered in the manuals. If you're on 7.6 in the chapter of the Advanced User Guide 8.  You can also use the online help which has the same information (make sure you spell centralized with a 'z' not an "s").

  Centralized management is essentially about how to manage a set of devices in a cluster, and if you configure that you configure all.

• IronPort M670 no operating system installed

  Hello! I got a RMA M670 Ironport, but it has nothing installed. He has just started.

  I want to know where an iso file so I can manually install Ironport.

  Thank you!

  If the unit of RMA has installed and you do not get the AsyncOS standard start, you will need to follow up with the case which was opened for the RAM, or you must open a new support case:

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/ServiceRequestTool/SCM/Mgmt/case

  You can follow the quick start guide:

  Cisco IronPort M670 quick start guide

  At startup - you should just after the bend standard process.  Once the device is online, assign a temporary IP address and migrate the old configuration according to the needs, as appropriate.

  I hope this helps!

  -Robert

  (* If you have received the answer to your original question and found it useful/correct - mark it as answered if it pleases you and don't forget to leave a note to reflect!)

• License for a new ironport

  Hello

  I have a question concern my ironport.

  my boxes, I replaced it with a new one with the RMA, and when I try to add the licenses I get an error

  I have a new license of cisco or convert the old one

  Thank you in advance

  Kind regards

  You should be able to follow the instructions for the transfer of the license here.  If you still experience problems, contact TAC.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/email-security-applia...