Calculation of the time of

Similar Questions

• Calculation of the time wall of a SQL query.

  Hello

  While trying to discover the time of running a SQL query (wall time) I read in one place that CPU_TIME/EXECUTIONS of v$ SQLAREA, is the precise runtime we can come close to.

  I can't use "set timing on ' or 'DBMS_UTILITY. GET_TIME' that I need to extract the execution time of the story because the query will be drawn to an end, and I need to know how long it took to DB level and compare it with the end time before calculating the % of time used in the DB level total.

  Maybe another way to track sessions and the user TKPORPOF but now I donot want to take the help of the ADMINISTRATOR at this initial stage.

  Is CPU_TIME/EXECUTIONS of v$ SQLAREA where (SQL_TEXT) AS "SELECT... OF... %'; should be enough?

  user2925917, yes as Brian already answered your understanding as posted above seems correct.  Except in the case where there has been only a running query you will download an average time.  The problem with averages is that one or two unusual executions that can skew the average, but in most cases the average will be probably fairly accurate.

  - -

  HTH - Mark D Powell.

• Calculation of the time of numbers

  Hello

  I am wondering how to calculate the amount of time in a cell for a while and have the result show the amount of time in hours and minutes

  what I have is a cell with once inside, for example 06:30, and I want to be able to have the next cell in the row to calculate the time between the first cell and a static time of 07:00 culminating at 00:30 (30 minutes).

  I played with formulas as IF (C2

  How can I go about it?

  Thank you

  Hi lgp,.

  Subtract the twice to get a period.

  

  Formula in B2 (fill down)

  = B$ 1−A2

  Know in numbers, when you enter a time, he always has a Date (even if the skins of cell data Format Date, it's still there).

  So in A9, entering at 06:30 on Dec. 12, B9 show the number of minutes 1 day in less than 30 minutes (because B1 was seized Dec. 11). Therefore:

  

  Kind regards

  Ian.

  .

• Calculation of the time spent in the object

  I have 2 date fields and I am trying to calculate the time elapsed between 2 minutes after editing the page. Each timestamp is set with a workflow rule. There is a function, TIMESTAMPDIFF(), analytics which is just what I need, but I can't seem to reproduce in the subject field.

  We do not support the workflow of time based in the next version (R17) CRM On demand.

• Why my calculation at the time loop repeats only once?

  I have a series of simple calculations (multiply, divide, add, subtract) occurring in a while loop based on input data on the front panel of the user. The results are then connected to local variables that alter the parameters of a signal generator in one another while loop.

  The while containing the iteration of repetitions one calculation, unless I turn the button "Highlight execution" in which case it repeats until the loop is stopped as I expect. With the 'performance highlight' button and using a probe to check instead of the loop does not repeat itself.

  Another while loop with the signal generator allows to reproduce, but uses only the values which were concluded before the VI began to run.

  I need the VI to be recalculated each time a value on the front panel is changed and change the output of the generator signal accordingly.

  What Miss me?

  Because local variables are fixed on the LEDs that are in the position it after the end of the VI it runs correctly the first time and only executes a forward iteration to stop, all in a loop containing calculations, if you run the VI more than once. As long as the LEDS are in the off position when the VI is launched then everything works fine.

  Thanks for the advice, everyone.

• Calculation of the time differences between several lines

  Hello
  
  I have a table as below:
  
  EVENT ID DATE
  1. start 05/03/2012-13:00
  1. stop the 15:00 05/04/2012
  1. start 09:00 05/07/2012
  1 stop on 05/09/2012 10:00
  Start 2 08/06/2012-08:00
  2 stop on 08/07/2012 10:00
  
  I would like to calculate the duration (in hours ideally) between 'Start' and 'Stop' for each ID, so having a set of lines:
  
  ID TimeSpan
  ---------------------
  1 75
  26 2
  
  I would appreciate any idea how to solve this, ideally as a SQL solution or maybe a function.
  
  Thank you very much!
  Tom

  The difference between two dates is a number, where 1 = 1 day. Multiply by 24 to get hours.

  Use the LAG, as stated above, to compare the date prior to the current date.

  create table T(TID, EVENT, TDATE) as select
  1, 'start', TO_DATE('03/05/2012 13:00:00', 'dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') from DUAL union all select
  1, 'Stop',  TO_DATE('04/05/2012 15:00:00', 'dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') from DUAL union all select
  1, 'start', TO_DATE('07/05/2012 09:00:00', 'dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') from DUAL union all select
  1, 'Stop',  TO_DATE('09/05/2012 10:00:00', 'dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') from DUAL union all select
  2, 'start', TO_DATE('06/08/2012 08:00:00', 'dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') from DUAL union all select
  2, 'Stop',  TO_DATE('07/08/2012 10:00:00', 'dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss') from DUAL;
  
  select tid, round(sum(hours)) hours from (
    select case
      when EVENT = 'Stop' then 24*(TDATE - LAG(TDATE) over(partition by TID order by TDATE))
      else 0 end hours,
    TID from T
  )
  group by tid;
  
  TID HOURS
  --- -----
    1    75
    2    26
  

• Calculation of the minority

  Is it possible to make the minority interest calculation in the subroutine compute ()...
  
  Concerning

  Minority Intrest is calculated at the time of the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and not during the independent preparation of financial statements in accounting. the same rule is also followed in HFM.

  So calculating minority interest is written in the consolidate() subroutine.

  Concerning
  Varun

• Type [0] unknown calculation for the dynamic calculation. Only default agg/formula/time balance operations are managed.

  Hi all

  I came across this error last Monday. I tried all the recommendations and configurations and nothing seems to work to solve the problem.

  Here is the error message-

  [Game Sep 24 12:04:27 2015] Local, ARPLAN, ARPLAN, Ess.Tee@MSAD_2010/9240/Error (1012703)

  Type [0] unknown calculation for the dynamic calculation. Only default agg/formula/time balance operations are managed.

  [Game Sep 24 12:04:33 2015] Local, ARPLAN, ARPLAN, Ess.Tee@MSAD_2010/9240/Warning (1080014)

  Abandoned due to the State [1012703] [0x2e007c (0x56042d17.0xeadd0)] transaction.

  [Game Sep 24 12:04:33 2015] Local, ARPLAN, ARPLAN, Ess.Tee@MSAD_2010/8576/Warning (1080014)

  Abandoned due to the State [1012703] [0x40007d (0x56042d18.0x781e0)] transaction.

  [Game Sep 24 12:04:34 2015] Local, ARPLAN, ARPLAN, Ess.Tee@MSAD_2010/736/Info (1012579)

  Total time elapsed Calc [Forecast.csc]: [621,338] seconds

  The script I'm running-

  SET CACHE HIGH;

  SET MSG SUMMARY;

  LOW GAME REVIEWS;

  UPDATECALC OFF SET;

  SET AGGMISSG

  GAME CALCPARALLEL 2;

  SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ

  SET HIGH LOCKBLOCK;

  FIX ('FY16', 'Final', 'Forecasts', '11 + 1 forecasts', 'prediction of 10 + 2', '9 + 3 forecast', '8 + 4 forecasts', "forecast 7 + 5", "6 + 6 forecast", "forecast 5 + 7", 'forecast of 4 + 8', '3 + 9 forecast', 'forecast 2 + 10', '1 + 11 forecasts')

  DIFFICULTY (@IDESCENDANTS ('entity'))

  CALC DIM ("account");

  ENDFIX

  DIM CALC ("entity", "Currency");

  ENDFIX

  In the essbase.cfg I have already included-

  NETDELAY 24000

  NETRETRYCOUNT 4500

  /Calculator cache settings

  CALCCACHEHIGH 50000000

  CALCCACHEDEFAULT 10000000

  200000 CALCCACHELOW

  Lockblock/set limits

  CALCLOCKBLOCKHIGH 150000

  CALCLOCKBLOCKDEFAULT 20000

  CALCLOCKBLOCKLOW 10000

  Please suggest if there is a way to fix this error. I get a similar error for other calculations as well.

  Kind regards

  EssTee

  And you are positive that no one came in a new Member at level 0 as dynamic Calc?

  What are the versions do you use?

• Best way to track the time of calculation of planning

  Hello

  Our management has asked us to provide monthly reports of the time of calculations in our main application of planning.

  We have identified one or two global level calculations we want to follow.   We run these calcs about 6 times a day on average.

  But it is almost impossible to sort through the massive application log (when presentations are completed) and filter it down (we tried, but newspaper is very difficult to work with).

  Has anyone developed a simple method (automatic) for the monitoring of the amount of time it takes for a calculation specific to planning?   We use calc Manager by the way to expand our rules and rulesets.   Ideally, we could get some kind of automated report which showed us the cases when the specific rule / ruleset ran and the duration of each instance.

  Thank you
  Mark

  Hi Mark,

  If these are calc manager rule, you should have all the necessary details in the HSP_JOB_STATUS table. You may be able to get this information from a simple query on this table. However, this information is also available in your planning application via Tools-> "Work Console" option, you will not see the time of calculation. It shows only the start and end time.

  Kind regards

  Sunil

• App for the time and payroll sheet calculations

  My daughter in hospitality makes work so much split and travel on a Saturday and Sunday. I am looking for an application that we can punch in his hours for the week and be able to do the calculation of salary based on the appropriate hourly rate so that we can keep control of when it is paid as it's done correctly. Essentially, I'm lookin for an app connects timesheet information to the payroll data. Such an application exists and if so can anyone recommend one? Happy to pay for an if need be.

  Hello alissah6,

  Numbers from Apple is what I would recommend as far as doing calculations with a simple formula. You can learn more about this here.

  The application costs $14.99, however it is packed and has more than 30 models - not to mention, you can also create your own if necessary.

  I would check it out certainly if I'm looking for a few terms related to pay calculation in the App Store.

  Thank you

  James.

• vertical scale 5152, set up the time

  I use a pxi-5152 in a pxi-1033 chassis.

  I want to play a trick and change the vertical scale between my measurements to increase the dynamic range of a signal that I'm scanning.  I made a loop and changed the vertical scale property node after each measurement.  It works, but when I timed it the loop, she seems to take 80 ms.  I need to do in less than 10 milliseconds.

  Is it still possible?  I see the real time it takes for the scale change or there at - it something to speed up?

  I also have access to a PXI real-time with the same card.  Could only accelerate things or is the digitized the limiting on the change of scale factor?

  Thanks for any help

  -Rich

  Hi rich,

  I see the real time it takes for the scale change or there at - it something to speed up?

  You probably see the effect of the two.  There may be something of software that you can do to improve it, but there's always a material limitation when you do this kind of operation.  Switching of the means of vertical lines change from one type of mitigation to another path.  This means there is sedimentation time involved (electronic and mechanical, with obviously dominant mechanics).  The main element in the run-in will probably be the relays that are reversed.  There must be a minimum period after the passage of a relay to ensure the data read by the digitizer are correct / valid.

  Since you know your signal is going in a direction (descending), then you may be able to improve somewhat by calling the property to write the new range, and then commit node & initiating in a loop which contains a minimum transformation (possibly using queues in LabVIEW to transfer the data in another loop of treatment).  If you need treatment in the loop, you must perform the treatment after niScope commit but before launch niScope.  This will allow the digitizer begin to settle in the new configuration, and you have to wait less time when you're ready to call to initiate.

  I also have access to a PXI real-time with the same card.  Could only accelerate things or is the digitized the limiting on the change of scale factor?

  Real-time processing ensures determinism, it does not necessarily speed up the application.  Determinism and defining a specific priority for calculations of software can help speed upward the software that you are running, the interface of low-level PCI/PXI bus driver with the instrument probably will not change radically.  You can certainly try though and let us know what you measure.

  I can understand if it is a fundamental issue, because normally people are not change the range of vertical entry on the fly, but if there is a way around it, it will avoid the need for me to put an amplifier with variable gain on the front-end server or buy a digitizer with more bits.

  This isn't a perfect suggestion, but just a thought: If you have several scanners at your disposal, you might try setting each to a fixed vertical range and split the signal among them.  TClk, you can synchronize these devices together to make sure your data points are sampled at the same time, and then introduce delays in the initial on each digitizer trigger so that they take account of the waveform in a cascade mode.  For example,.

  Digitizer #1, attached to the greater vertical reach, would have no time limit from the time wherever the trigger is received.

  #2 digitizer, set at a smaller vertical range has a fixed period of (10ms?)

  Digitizer #3, value the smaller Beach, has a fixed time (20ms?).

  Otherwise, if you have assistance with the OR, you could try to call a technical sales engineer to discuss other possible options.

  -Andrew

• a stop time loop by using the time difference of two counts of ticks

  Hi guys,.

  I'm writing currently a code test how much time does it take for a formula node perform its operation. The program uses some time to perform the calculation in a loop, and the program stops after having calculated when the number of cycles reached 10 seconds. The program then displays the number of iterations, he does it in 10 seconds.

  If at the beginning, I created 2 images of the structure of the sequence. In my first image, I have my original number, and as part of my second, I have my final number of cycles and the while loop. I used the subtraction function and divide the result by 1000 to get jet lag. Then using the comparison function, I put if output > 10 then the program must stop, to do this, I've linked out of the comparison function to the button stop inside the while loop.

  However, when I tried to run the code, the program just didn't run. That's why I created a similar program that puts the final number of cycles in the new image sequence. When I ran this code, the program never stopped.

  Guys do you have any idea what was wrong with my codes.

  Thank you!

  Erry

  Stream!

  In the two VI the Terminal stop of the while loop is controlled by a Boolean value whose source is outside of the while loop.  If this loop will be executed once, or forever, depending on the value of the Boolean value which is calculated before the loop starts and comes to the tunnel through the loop.

  I recommend you watch the LabVIEW tutorials online
  LabVIEW Introduction course - 3 hours
  LabVIEW Introduction course - 6 hours

• the time of acquisition of data - how to calculate the rate of analog output

  I want to calculate an acceptable rate of analog output, one that is taken in charge by material (PCIe6353), without the rate being changed by the VI DAQmx Timing (sample clock). The final objective is to have a rate of analog output that is an integer multiple of the analog input for precise frequency, since the sinusoid AO's amplifiers, which have a ringtone when AO updates occur.

  According to 27R8Q3YF of the knowledge base: how the actual scanning speed is determined when I specify the rate of scanning to My d..., the rate is revised as needed by calculating the rate of clock / asked for advice, divide the result rounded downwards and upwards in the clock of the Board and use the one that is closest to the requested speed.

  If 'Embedded clock' is selected, which is the result "Council clock.  DAQmx sample clock timebase Timing node - SampClk.Timebase.Rate says 100 ms/s. However, for a rate resulting from the update of 2.38095MS / s, the divisor of the time base timing node - "SampClk.TimebaseDiv" gives a value of 42. 42 x 2.38095 M = 99, 999, 990, where it should be 100 ms/s.

  How to calculate an acceptable rate of analog output is supported by the hardware? I have other plates, in addition, a general method would be appreciated.

  I haven't worked all the details yet but noticed a few things that may be relevant.

  Req AI rate isn't a whole ditch 1E8. It is used to determine the rate of the AO.

  There is no check to ensure that the rate of the AO is an integer division.

  It seems that you have the right idea, but the implementation is not yet there.

  Lynn

• How to count the time exactly?

  I tried to count the time using a VI like the one attached.

  It's that's not couting correctly. There is a possible reason, I have observed.

  The computer isn't able to handle the VI as soon as necessary.

  I thought about this because, when in edit mode the time count was very bad, and, when I created an application and installed, it ran okay, how 'light '. But today, when I tried to use this application with an old computer it did not work. The clock is slow.

  Is it possible to count the time correctly?

  I use a DAQ6009 to make my works, my VI is big enough and I need one iteration to each 1 ms (milliseconds) as I am with digital inputs from 5 events of coders (I know that's not the right way to count the encoders, but it's the only way I can do it, and it works).

  Thank you in advace! I hope you can help me!

  Hugs!

  Ok.  I will try to help you understand certain things.

  The number of cycles and wait (and wait until the next ms Multiple) functions all use a 1 kHz derived from the clock of the processor clock. The accuracy of these clocks is not large, although they are probably similar to the precision of the stopwatch.  Any time generated by these functions will show some differences in the time of the clock as it is derived from a different oscillator.

  Updates from the front panel are time by LabVIEW and the operating system. Most of the screens are updated with 60 to 80 times per second, maximum. What made the operating system, an update of the screen might be delayed by 10s of milliseconds or more.  It is certain that not all of the values at the end of the Add function will be displayed.

  Wait for him until the next ms many will wait more than 1 ms if the other code in the loop takes longer than 1 ms.  I don't know, but I think that the indicator is buffered so that any delay by the operating system to update the display should not slow down the loop. I tried to remove the flag, and it doesn't seem to make a big difference.

  I modified your VI to provide several indications of the performance. First of all, I added to the sequence of three-frame structure to allow synchronization of the loop. Second, I changed to a loop which runs a specified number of iterations. Thirdly, I hooked up the output of the timer until the next ms Multiple to a tunnel of autoindexing allowing a record of the time of each iteration appears in the table of ticks. I calculated the differences between successive instants and poster on a chart, so that you can see the performance.

  I didn't want to sound criticism of your use of English.  You write in English, much better than I could in your language!  What I was trying to make is that such general descriptions that ' Besides correctly ' without quantitative results or evidence in support of the application do not have enough information to help us help you.

  Lynn

• calculation of the average value of the sorted data and polar route drawing

  Hello

  I did a VI that calculates the average value of the wind rotor/speed-ratio in the sections of 30 degrees (wind direction). He also called the polar plot of calculated data. Everything works, but I would like to make more detailed calculations and drawings, by increasing the resolution to 1 degree, or...

  Problem is VI, I did, is not easy on a large scale. At the moment, I have 12 parallel structures of switch-box to calculate the average value and build the array function to collect data calculated for Polar plot to draw the image in real time. I know it's probably the worst way to do it, but since I have done a few things with LV, it was the only way I managed to do what I wanted.

  Now, if I continue in same way to reach my goal, I have to create 360 Parallels switch-case structures... that are crazy.

  Something like the calculation of the average of the table or matrix (zero/empty values should not be calculated on average) inside the loop or similar way would probably be the best solution.

  So, polar plot drawing is not a problem, but creating a reasonalbe average metering system is. Any ideas?

  I would also like to rotare northward to the top (0 deg), and degrees of increase in a clockwise direction on polar ground dial plate (as on the compass).

  VI on the attachment. (simplified version of the complete system)

  I have signals:

  -Wind speed

  -wind direction

  -Rotor speed

  I want to:

  -calculate the average value of the speed of the wind / rotor - ratio in sections (5 degrees, 1 degree)

  -Draw a polar path of the wind rotor/speed-ratio of averages in propotion of wind direction

  I'm using LabView 2009

  Thank you very much.

  It is closer to what you're looking for?