Can fast VPN and VPN Cisco coexist (WRVS4400N)

Similar Questions

• Want to 4500 and 4520: can fancy 4500 and want 4520 coexist as selection printers?

  I had one desire to 4500 for about 18 months and just bought a 4520 desire and want to use interchangeably two printers.  When installing drivers 4520 want to internet, he failed twice. I used the CD provided and managed to instal want 4520 successfully.  I note however for the digitization of the device and the printer control panel, Envy 4500 has been "removed" but not deleted.  It seems that I must reinstal 4500 want next time I want to use it.  Is there a better solution?  They both cannot exist under another printer?

  Hello
  
  Thank you for using the HP Forums.

  In theory, the two must be able to exist together.

  Just that alone can be the default printer and if you want to print from another printer, you must select specifically in some software/applications that you use.

  Suggest that you uninstall and reinstall each one printer at a time again.

  http://support.HP.com/us-en/drivers/selfservice/identify?q=envy+4500 & Tool = s-002 #Z7_3054ICK0K8UDA0AQC11TA930O2

  First select a printer, select win 10 OS download/install the FULL features software, then repeat with the 2nd printer. Note that the 2nd printer will "Default" (since it is the most recent must be installed)

  Hope that helps.

• RV082 and fast VPN

  I tried to configure my router RV082 all OE quick VPN access. I bought this router a few years back with the intention of setting up a VPN. Now that I need to do, this product is no longer supported.

  In any case, down to the problem - I can not past the first problem. I get an error that says: "Unable to connect" and it lists 5 problems:

  1. wrong password

  2. no IP address for the network card

  3. incorrect server address

  4. you may need to disable your windows firewall

  5. conflicts of IP addresses with the subnet of the remote VPN server

  I just tackle these questions

  1. I am using the correct password

  2. I have an IP address, I can get on the internet

  3 server address is correct

  4. do not use the windows firewall (I have even disabled my firewall, netgear home but no help)

  5. work 192.168.0.x subnet, host is 192.168.1.x, different subnets.

  When I'm at home, I can connect to the remote router configuration page, but I can't get anywhere with fast VPN. I tried this on 3 different networks, all give me the same answer. I am inclined to believe that this must mean I'm incorrectly configured on the router, but I followed all the steps as described by linksys. I even upgraded to the latest firmware and the latest version of quickVPN all to nothing does not.

  I use access rules to guide the SQL traffic to one of our servers, that is the question? Any ideas?

  Thank you for your response. You are right it is not access rules, but it is the configuration of the router. In the tab "Firewall", you need to enable HTTPS. There was nowhere in the product manual update, I downloaded, but it was on the info for the Firewall page tab. The only reason why that I disabled it HTTPS is that my remote management session with the previous firmware would sometimes close unexpectedly under HTTPS. In any case, connection works fine now.

  So my next question has to do with the speed. This is the first time I've gotten a quick VPN to work. When I connect to my ping time to a server is 60-80ms. At work, it is 1 ms. It is common to have a time big lag? Unfortunately at this slow speed this VPN may not be such a solution. I used a PPTP VPN in the past and latency are not too bad, but of course there is no encryption that is important here. Any thoughts on the speed?

• Doubt the implementation in a VPN between a VPN3005 and a Cisco 827 router

  Imagine this:

  Establish a VPN tunnel between the central administration (VPN3005) and a branch (827). Only need to spend intellectual property data in the tunnel and the two sites must reach the resources of the other, which means I don't want not just any what NAT involved.

  Can someone tell me what is the way to better/simple to do this?

  Can it be implemented with Cisco easy VPN? (or not, due to not wanting to make any type of NAT)

  Thanks in advance!

  Hello

  I would have preferred a VPN Tunnel from Lan to Lan. I have attached a few URLS that

  explains the implementation of IPSec Lan to Lan tunnel in different scenarios:

  1. with the router with a static routable ip address

  http://www.Cisco.com/warp/public/471/ALTIGAR.shtml

  2. with the router is assigned an IP via DHCP.

  http://www.Cisco.com/warp/public/471/vpn3k_iosdhcp.html

  Kind regards

  Arul

• IPSec vpn cisco asa and acs 5.1

  We have configured authentication ipsec vpn cisco asa acs 5.1:

  Here is the config in cisco vpn 5580:

  standard access list acltest allow 10.10.30.0 255.255.255.0

  RADIUS protocol AAA-server Gserver

  AAA-server host 10.1.8.10 Gserver (inside)

  Cisco key

  AAA-server host 10.1.8.11 Gserver (inside)

  Cisco key

  internal group gpTest strategy

  gpTest group policy attributes

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list acltest

  type tunnel-group test remote access

  tunnel-group test general attributes

  address localpool pool

  Group Policy - by default-gpTest

  authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver

  authorization-server-group Gserver

  accounting-server-group Gserver

  IPSec-attributes of tunnel-group test

  pre-shared-key cisco123

  GBA, we config user group: VPN users. all VPN users in this group. ACS can visit his political profile: If the user in the 'VPN users' group, access ACS.

  When we connect from a VPN Client to the server, all users connect to success. When you see the parser in ACS journal, each user success connect also get

  error:

  22040 wrong password or invalid shared secret

  (pls see picture to attach it)

  the system still works, but I don't know why, we get the error log.

  Thanks for any help you can provide!

  Duyen

  Hello Duyen,

  I think I've narrowed the issue. When remote access VPN using RADIUS authentication we must keep in mind that authentication and authorization are included on the same package.

  Depending on your configuration, the ACS is defined as a server RADIUS (Gserver Protocol radius aaa server) and becomes the VPN Tunnel authenticated and 'authorized' on this server group:

  authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver

  authorization-server-group Gserver

  As noted above, the RADIUS of request/response includes authentication and authorization on the same package. This seems to be a problem of incorrect configuration that we should not set up the 'permission' in the Tunnel of the group.

  Please remove the authorization under the Tunnel of Group:

  No authorization-server-group Gserver

  Please test the connection again and check the logs of the ACS. At this point there are only sucessful newspaper reported on the side of the ACS.

  Is 'Permission-server-group' LDAP permission when authenticating to a LDAP server so to retrieve the attributes of permission on the server. RAY doesn't have the command as explained above.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards.

• VPN CISCO RV110W fail.

  Hello

  I have a router Aztech DSL1015EW (S) and Cisco RV100w. Here's my setup.

  Phone - RJ11---> DSL1015EW (S) - RJ45---> RV110W

  -J' tried to build the portable computer remote VPN connection to RV110W (failed)

  -Also failefk quick VPN

  -PPTP failed

  Port forwarding on DSL1015EW

  I don't have the public ip address

  I use dydns.

  What can I do? Please help me.

  Fast VPN error message is "bridge not answer do you expect ot.

  PPTP error code is cannot estiblishe to the remote host.

  Hello

  Hi, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I left the community of support to small businesses.

  I apologize for your stress, in this case I advise you to check this link with useful information about the VPN fast https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-29399

  I hope you find this answer useful,

  "* Please mark the issue as response or write it down so others can benefit from.

  Greetings,

  Johnnatan Rodríguez Miranda.

  Support of Cisco network engineer.

• Check the ISE for the VPN Cisco posture

  Hello community,

  first of all thank you for taking the time to read my post. I have a deployment in which requires the characteristic posture of controls for machines of VPN Cisco ISE. I know that logically once a machine on the LAN, Cisco ISE can detect and apply controls posture on clients with the Anyconnect agent but what about VPN machines? The VPN will end via a VPN concentrator, which then connects to an ASA5555X that is deployed as an IPS only. Are there clues to this?

  Thank you!

  The Cisco ASA Version 9.2.1 supports the change in RADIUS authorization (CoA) (RFC 5176). This allows for the gesticulations of users against the ISE Cisco VPN without the need of an IPN. Once a VPN user connects, the ASA redirects web traffic to the LSE, where the user is configured with a Network Admission Control (NAC) or Web Agent. The agent performs specific controls on the user's computer to determine its conformity against one together configured posture rules, such as the rules of operating system (OS) patches, AntiVirus, registry, Application, or Service.

  The posture validation results are then sent to the ISE. If the machine is considered the complaint, then the ISE can send a RADIUS CoA to the ASA with the new set of authorization policies. After validation of the successful posture and CoA, the user is allowed to access internal resources.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/Adaptive-Security-Appliance-ASA-software/117693-configure-ASA-00.html

• Problem with ping VPN cisco 877

  Hi all!

  I have a working VPN between a fortigate and a Cisco.

  I have a problem with ping network behind the cisco of the network behind the forti.

  When I ping to vlan2 cisco without problem (192.168.252.1) interface, but I can't ping a server in the vlan2 (192.168.252.2) behind the cisco.

  However the Cisco I can ping the server. In the forti, I see that ping to the interface vlan2 and server in vlan2 take in the same way, and I can see package.

  I post my config could see it it as blocking the ping from 10.41.2.36 to 192.168.252.2 while 192.168.252.1 ping is OK?

  IPSEC #show run
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 3302 bytes
  !
  ! Last modification of the configuration at 14:42:17 CEDT Friday, June 25, 2010
  ! NVRAM config update at 14:42:23 CEDT Friday, June 25, 2010
  !
  version 12.4
  no service button
  horodateurs service debug datetime msec
  Log service timestamps datetime localtime show-time zone
  encryption password service
  !
  IPSEC host name
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  logging buffered 1000000
  enable secret 5 abdellah
  !
  No aaa new-model
  clock timezone GMT 1
  clock to summer time CEDT recurring last Sun Mar 02:00 last Sun Oct 03:00
  !
  !
  dot11 syslog
  IP cef
  No dhcp use connected vrf ip
  DHCP excluded-address IP 192.168.254.0 192.168.254.99
  DHCP excluded-address IP 192.168.254.128 192.168.254.255
  !
  IP dhcp DHCP pool
  network 192.168.254.0 255.255.255.0
  router by default - 192.168.254.254
  Server DNS A.A.A.A B.B.B.B
  !
  !
  no ip domain search
  name of the IP-server A.A.A.A
  name of the IP-server B.B.B.B
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA aes 256
  preshared authentication
  Group 5
  ISAKMP crypto key ciscokey address IP_forti
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac vpntest
  !
  myvpn 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  defined by peer IP_forti
  Set transform-set vpntest
  match address 101
  !
  Archives
  The config log
  hidekeys
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  interface Tunnel0
  IP 2.2.2.1 255.255.255.252
  source of Dialer0 tunnel
  destination of IP_forti tunnel
  myvpn card crypto
  !
  ATM0 interface
  bandwidth 320
  no ip address
  load-interval 30
  No atm ilmi-keepalive
  DSL-automatic operation mode
  !
  point-to-point interface ATM0.1
  MTU 1492
  bandwidth 160
  PVC 8/35
  VBR - nrt 160 160
  PPPoE-client dial-pool-number 1
  !
  !
  interface FastEthernet0
  switchport access vlan 2
  !
  interface FastEthernet1
  !
  interface FastEthernet2
  !
  interface FastEthernet3
  switchport access vlan 2
  !
  interface Vlan1
  IP 192.168.20.253 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside
  no ip virtual-reassembly
  !
  interface Vlan2
  IP 192.168.252.1 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly
  !
  interface Dialer0
  bandwidth 128
  the negotiated IP address
  NAT outside IP
  no ip virtual-reassembly
  encapsulation ppp
  load-interval 30
  Dialer pool 1
  Dialer-Group 1
  KeepAlive 1 2
  Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol
  PPP chap hostname [email protected] / * /
  PPP chap password 7 abdelkrim
  myvpn card crypto
  !
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
  IP route 10.41.2.32 Tunnel0 255.255.255.240
  !
  no ip address of the http server
  no ip http secure server
  The dns server IP
  translation of nat IP tcp-timeout 5400
  no ip nat service sip 5060 udp port
  overload of IP nat inside source list NAT interface Dialer0
  !
  IP access-list standard BROADCAST
  permit of 0.0.0.0
  deny all
  !
  NAT extended IP access list
  IP enable any host IP_cisco
  deny ip 192.168.252.0 0.0.0.255 10.41.2.32 0.0.0.31
  !
  access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.252.0 0.0.0.255 10.41.2.32 0.0.0.31
  public RO SNMP-server community
  3 RW 99 SNMP-server community
  SNMP-server community a RO
  SNMP-Server RO community oneCommunityRead
  not run cdp
  !
  !
  !
  control plan
  !
  !
  Line con 0
  password 7 abdelkrim
  opening of session
  no activation of the modem
  line to 0
  line vty 0 4
  password 7 aaaaa
  opening of session
  escape character 5
  !
  max-task-time 5000 Planner
  NTP-period clock 17175037
  Server NTP B.B.B.B
  Server NTP A.A.A.A

  end

  Alex,

  It's your GRE tunnel:

  interface Tunnel0
  IP 2.2.2.1 255.255.255.252
  source of Dialer0 tunnel
  destination of IP_forti tunnel
  myvpn card crypto

  You also have routing set by it.

  You don't need a GRE tunnel, nor do you need the road to tunnel if you want just IPsec tunnel.

• Order of operations NAT on Site to Site VPN Cisco ASA

  Hello

  I have a question about the order of operations NAT on Site to Site VPN Cisco ASA 8.2.x. I have a scenario where the internal IP address of the range 10.17.128.x are NATTED IP public 31.10.10.x. below is the config:

  Tunnel normally passes traffic to dmz - 31.10.11.10, 31.10.11.11 servers.

  But the servers NATTED (10.17.128.x <->31.10.10.x) does not work.

  inside_map crypto 50 card value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

  tunnel-group 100.1.1.1 type ipsec-l2l

  tunnel-group 100.1.1.1 General-attributes

  Group Policy - by default-PHX_HK

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 100.1.1.1

  pre-shared key *.

  internal PHX_HK group policy

  PHX_HK group policy attributes

  VPN-filter no

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec svc webvpn

  card crypto inside_map 50 match address outside_cryptomap_50

  peer set card crypto inside_map 50 100.1.1.1

  inside_map crypto 50 card value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

  inside_map crypto 50 card value reverse-road

  the PHX_Local object-group network

  host of the object-Network 31.10.11.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.11.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.20

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.21

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.22

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.23

  the HK_Remote object-group network

  host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  ACL_INSIDE list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  ACL_OUTSIDE list extended access permitted ip object-group HK_Remote-group of objects PHX_Local

  outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  Route outside 102.1.1.10 255.255.255.255 30.1.1.1 1

  public static 31.10.10.10 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.20 netmask 255.255.255.255

  public static 31.10.10.11 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.21 netmask 255.255.255.255

  public static 31.10.10.12 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.22 netmask 255.255.255.255

  public static 31.10.10.13 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.23 netmask 255.255.255.255

  He started to work when I did another group of object by name PHX_Local1 and added to the list of access inside_nat0_outbound, instead of the object group PHX_Local, as below:

  the PHX_Local1 object-group network

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

  No inside_nat0_outbound access list extended only to allowed ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local1-group of objects HK_Remote

  Can you please help me understand why group object PHX_Local failed with access-list inside_nat0_outbound, but he began to work with the Group of objects PHX_Local1.

  Also, if you could tell me the order of operations to NAT via VPN Site to Site, it would be useful.

  Thank you

  Kind regards

  Thomas

  Hello

  I think you could have said the original question in a way that could be missleading. In other words, if I understand now.

  From what I understand now, you have the DMZ set up the server that are measured with a public IP address on the real servers. And for those that you have configured NAT0.

  Then you have other servers that do not have public IP addresses themselves, but they are translated on the SAA.

  If this is the case, then the next question would be. The server with the NAT should attend the L2L VPN connection with their real IP or address IP NAT.

  Of course if you configure static NAT for the same servers and NAT0 the NAT0 will always win.

  You have these guests who were not able to use the VPN L2L

  31.10.10.10 10.17.128.20

  31.10.10.11 10.17.128.21

  31.10.10.12 10.17.128.22

  31.10.10.13 10.17.128.23

  IF you want them to go to the VPN L2L with their original IP address then you must configure

  object-group, LAN

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.20

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.21

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.22

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.23

  object-group, REMOTE network

  host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

  outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

  IF you want to use the L2L VPN with the public IP address, then you must configure

  object-group, LAN

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

  object-group, REMOTE network

  host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

  outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

  EDIT: in this case you naturally do not configure any NAT0 for actual IP addresses we want precisely the IP addresses to be visible to the L2L VPN with the IP NAT address.

  Or you can of course use the same "object-group" as currently but change the content in an appropriate manner

  Be sure to mark it as answered if it was answered.

  Ask more if necessary

  -Jouni

• Our ASA 5510 can provide VPN to our LAN cloud?

  Hi people,

  We have a number of (1 7 or if virtual, dedicated) servers hosted in a cloud provider well known on the West coast of the USA.

  They just put an ASA5510 across our LAN Server to help protect the servers.

  I was wondering if it is possible that the ASA5510 can provide VPN access to our LAN cloud? At the moment we have the firewall block - all - ports except 80/443/3389 (RDP for our Windows servers).

  I was actually hoping to block port 3389, so nobody can RDP on all servers. BUT... VPN in our LAN cloud, then we can connect to a server via RDP or any software / port. Indeed, the VPN opens all ports... you have created a VPN tunnel has provided

  So is this possible? The ASA5510 this offer?

  Last question-> and it's a ballast: gulp:...

  We cannot install any client software 3rd party... including any cisco vpn client software. We must use the built in software Windows7 VPN... making PPTP, SSTP, L2TP-IPSEC.

  So... now the ASA5510 can offer that? If so... is there any special scripts or configs I need to give to the Cloud hosting provider, so they can set the machine to work?

  Help, please!

  -Jussy-

  Two possibilities come to mind.

  -Built-in L2tp over Ipsec client.

  ASA config Guide:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa82/configuration/guide/l2tp_ips.html

  -Clientless webvpn (if RDP and other plugins, but requires java/activeX for some features...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa82/configuration/guide/WebVPN.html

  These options should work except ASA is in mode multi-conext.

  M.

• Customer Cisco IPSec vpn cisco ios router <>==

  Hello

  I need to implement ipsec vpn for all users of 10-15. They all use the vpn cisco 5.x client and we have a router for cisco ios at the office. We already have a situation of work for these users. However, it has become a necessity which known only devices (laptops company) are allowed to install a virtual private network.

  I think that the only way to achieve this is to use certificates. But we don't won't to buy certificates if there is a free way to implement. So my question is

  (1) what are the options I have to configure vpn ipsec, where only known devices can properly configure a vpn and all unknown devices are blocked?

  (2) if the certificate is the only way. Can I somehow produce these certificates myself using cisco router ios?

  (3) someone at - it an example of a similar installation/configuration?

  Thanks in advance.

  Kind regards

  M.

  Unfortunately if you connect to the router IOS, there is no other way except using the certificate. If you connect to a Cisco ASA firewall, then you can identify the laptop company using DAP (Dynamic Access Policy).

• Client VPN Cisco router Cisco, MSW CA + certificates

  Dear Sirs,
  Let me approach you on the following problem.

  I wanted to use a secure between the Cisco VPN client connection
  (Windows XP) and Cisco 2821 with certificate-based authentication.
  I used the Microsoft certification authority (Windows 2003 server).
  Cisco VPN client used eTokenPRO Aladdin as a certificate store.

  Certificate of MSW CA registration and implementation in eToken ran OK
  Customer VPN Cisco doesn't have a problem with the cooperation of eToken.
  Certificate of registration of Cisco2821 MSW ca ran okay too.

  Cisco 2821 configuration is standard. IOS version 12.4 (6).

  Attempt to connect to the client VPN Cisco on Cisco 2821 was
  last update of the error messages:

  ISAKMP: (1020): cannot get router cert or routerdoes do not have a cert: had to find DN!
  ISAKMP: (1020): ITS been RSA signature authentication more XAUTH using id ID_FQDN type
  ISAKMP (1020): payload ID
  next payload: 6
  type: 2
  FULL domain name: cisco - ca.firm.com
  Protocol: 17
  Port: 500
  Length: 25
  ISAKMP: (1020): the total payload length: 25
  ISAKMP (1020): no cert string to send to peers
  ISAKMP (1020): peer not specified not issuing and none found appropriate profile
  ISAKMP (1020): Action of WSF returned the error: 2
  ISAKMP: (1020): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
  ISAKMP: (1020): former State = new State IKE_R_MM5 = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

  Is there some refence where is possible to find some information on
  This problem? There is someone who knows how to understand these mistakes?
  Thank you very much for your help.

  Best regards
  P.Sonenberk

  PS Some useful information for people who are interested in the above problem.

  Address IP of Cisco 2821 10.1.1.220, client VPN IP address is 10.1.1.133.
  MSW's IP 10.1.1.50.
  Important parts of the Cisco 2821 configuration:

  !
  cisco-ca hostname
  !
  ................
  AAA new-model
  !
  AAA authentication login default local
  AAA authentication login sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
  AAA authorization exec default local
  AAA authorization sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 LAN
  !
  ...............
  IP domain name firm.com
  host IP company-cu 10.1.1.50
  host to IP cisco-vpn1 10.1.1.133
  name of the IP-server 10.1.1.33
  !
  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-4097309259
  enrollment selfsigned
  name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 4097309259
  revocation checking no
  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-4097309259
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint company-cu
  registration mode ra
  Enrollment url http://10.1.1.50:80/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll
  use of ike
  Serial number no
  IP address no
  password 7 005C31272503535729701A1B5E40523647
  revocation checking no
  !
  TP-self-signed-4097309259 crypto pki certificate chain
  certificate self-signed 01
  30820249 308201B 2 A0030201 02020101 300 D 0609 2A 864886 F70D0101 04050030
  .............
  FEDDCCEA 8FD14836 24CDD736 34
  quit smoking
  company-cu pki encryption certificate chain
  certificate 1150A66F000100000013
  30820509 308203F1 A0030201 02020 HAS 11 092A 8648 01000000 13300 06 50A66F00
  ...............
  9E417C44 2062BFD5 F4FB9C0B AA
  quit smoking
  certificate ca 51BAC7C822D1F6A3469D1ADC32D0EB8C
  30820489 30820371 A0030201 BAC7C822 02021051 D1F6A346 9D1ADC32 D0EB8C30
  ...............
  C379F382 36E0A54E 0A6278A7 46
  quit smoking
  !
  ...................
  crypto ISAKMP policy 30
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  authentication rsa-BA
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto identity hostname
  !
  Configuration group customer isakmp crypto Group159
  key Key159Key
  pool SDM_POOL_1
  ACL 100
  !
  the crypto isakmp client configuration group them
  domain firm.com
  pool SDM_POOL_1
  ACL 100
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac 3DES-MD5
  !
  crypto dynamic-map SDM_DYNMAP_1 1
  the transform-set 3DES-MD5 value
  market arriere-route
  !
  card crypto SDM_CMAP_1 client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
  map SDM_CMAP_1 isakmp authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 crypto
  client configuration address map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto answer
  map SDM_CMAP_1 65535-isakmp dynamic SDM_DYNMAP_1 ipsec crypto
  !
  ................
  !
  end

  status company-cu of Cisco-ca #show cryptographic pki trustpoints
  Trustpoint company-cu:
  Issuing CA certificate configured:
  Name of the object:
  CN = firm-cu, dc = company, dc = local
  Fingerprint MD5: 5026582F 8CF455F8 56151047 2FFAC0D6
  Fingerprint SHA1: 47B 74974 7C85EA48 760516DE AAC84C5D 4427E829
  Universal router configured certificate:
  Name of the object:
  host name = cisco - ca.firm.com
  Fingerprint MD5: E78702ED 47D5D36F B732CC4C BA97A4ED
  Fingerprint SHA1: 78DEAE7E ACC12F15 1DFB4EB8 7FC DC6F3B7E 00138
  State:
  Generated keys... Yes (general purpose, not exportable)
  Authenticated issuing certification authority... Yes
  Request certificate (s)... Yes

  Cisco-ca #sh crypto pubkey-door-key rsa
  Code: M - configured manually, C - excerpt from certificate

  Name of code use IP-address/VRF Keyring
  C Signature name of X.500 DN default:
  CN = firm-cu
  DC = company
  DC = local

  C signature by default cisco-vpn1

  IMPORTANT: I don't have a Cisco IOS Software: 12.4 (5), 12.3 (11) T08, 12.4 (4.7) PI03c,.
  12.4 (4.7) T - there is error in the cryptographic module.

  Hey guys, it's weird that the router is not find cert after IKE is the cert and validates, it is certainly not reason, but I would go ahead and set up the mapping of certificate on this router to force the client to associate with Group of IKE, for that matter, that you need to change your config a bit for use iskamp profiles :

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gt_isakp.html

• Can a VPN 3005 cause multiple IP addresses on the external interface?

  Nice day

  Can a VPN 3005 cause several IPS on an external interface?

  I expect to use it in an environment that has 2 ADSL connections to an internet service provider. For the sake of the exercise, we could call them ROUTER1 and ROUTER2.

  We have a few VPN we always want to spend by ROUTER1 and some VPN we always want going through ROUTER2.

  Is this possible?

  Thank you very much

  No, not possible, sorry.

• What clients VPN Cisco 2811 supports?

  Is the solution of VPN Cisco 2811 locked customers cisco or that market with other brands too?

  Best regards Tommy Svensson

  Hello

  With the correct IOS feature set, it will support IPsec VPN clients. This includes not only the Cisco VPN client but almost any standard IPsec client.

  In addition, if on the 2811 can accept any browser SSL VPN connections, or even use the AnyConnect SSL client.

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• CAN bus off fast recovery and recovery slow modes

  Hello

  I know the busoff recovery procedure consists of monitoring the CAN bus up to 128 11 consecutive recessive bit sequences have been observed.

  But I want to know what is the bus fast recovery and slow the recovery.

  Thanks in advance.

  Kind regards

  Sagar Joshi

  Where you see the terms "broad recovery fast bus" and "slow bus off recovery". As far as I know, the spec CAN define only a single bus out of recovery.