Similar Questions

• With the help of NVIDIA GTX970, it will allow acceleration GPU rendering and playback instead of Mercury playback engine software only option?

  I want to buy GTX 970 NVIDIA,

  With the help of NVIDIA GTX970, it will allow acceleration GPU rendering and playback instead of Mercury playback engine software only option?

  Yes.

• ZOTAC GeForce GTX 750 Ti / Gigabyte Nvidia GT 710 sufficient for accelerating GPU in CC 2015?

  Hi all

  I have Photoshop 2015 and filter oil painting is grayed out. So, I want to update my graphics card. Please help me

  System Specs:

  Gigabyte GA 78LMT S2PV

  AMD FX 6100

  Hyper X 8 GB RAM

  GeForce 210 (OpenCl version is 1.0) (I need 1.1 or higher if they exsist)

  WD 1 TB purple

  Thermaltake TR2 500W PSU S

  PCI-E - 2

  If you want to suggest any other graphics card with limited budget, then it will be toasty come :)

  Photoshop and illustrator are less demanding than the first, so your cpu should be ok for them. If you get a video card only for photoshop and illustrator, you can watch the r7 amd 360 for about $90. If you want to spend more on rx 470 4 GB, it would be a good card for the money.

  CUDA is exclusively for nvidia only cards. Some software requires cuda/nvidia to work. If you use other software or plugins in addition to the adobe software, which uses the video card, you will need to get its system requirements and to see what video cards they list.

• Allowing the AMD Radeon R9 M370X (MacBook Pro mid-2015) for accelerating GPU on Adobe Premiere Pro and other

  Hi all

  I just "upgraded" my MacBook Pro to a model of end of 2013 with a NVIDIA GeForce GT 750 M to a whole new model mid-2015 with an AMD Radeon R9 M370X.

  To compare performance, configure queues of same rendering with Premiere Pro Media Encoder in four sequences. These sequences contained native 4 K XAVC I, but four sequences have been "cropped" on a chronology of 25 1080 p, which means that I actually not export 4 K images. All four were slightly different, but while a 50 minutes.

  As I wanted to get an example of 'real world', I left on the old machine as CUDA rendering engine, as it's the best performance I can get the machine and the rendering engine on the new machine that OpenCL.

  I have to fill out a similar task at least once a week, so I know by experience, a queue of rendering as it takes about 2 hours by sequence to return.

  The results were very interesting and a little tell-satisfactory. Essentially, render on the CUDA compatible machine times were about 30% faster through all sequences of four compared to the AMD powered machine.

  Perhaps, somewhat lengthy explanation, but basically, I would like to know how to activate the acceleration in Adobe CC GPU - but especially with Premiere Pro, After Effects and Media Encoder.

  Apple seem to think that they support OpenCL (https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202823), AMD announce their compatibility with Adobe CC (http://www.amd.com/en-us/solutions/software-partners/adobe) - then why my GPU does not appear as a recommended here model? - https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/system-requirements.html

  Any advice or suggestions are appreciated.

  Hey Connor,

  This R9 card comes out MAY 2015 and 2015 CC was released on June. So, any card (s) that is listed in Premiere Pro specifications list must pass appropriate tests. In addition, credit cards that has a 1 GB of VRAM is likely to allow "mercury Playback Engine" for use CUDA or open CL features.

  According to the rendering time is considered as MVidia GT 750 M has a priority on AMD R9 M370X. You can check and compare the two cards, and also check the link below.

  Radeon R7 M370 vs GeForce GT 750 M Mac

  Vinay

• GTX 750 it sufficient for accelerating GPU in CC 2014?

  Hi all

  Upgrade to a HD 5870 I hope - I just wanted to know if GTX 750 it with its CUDA technologies would be sufficient for GPU accelerated applications like Lr, Sg, Pr, Ps, Ae and so on? Ask in the forums Pr because it is the application, I use the most.

  System Specs:

  ASUS P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3

  Core i5 2500K @ 4.3 GHz

  Arctic Cooling Freezer 13

  16 GB RipJaws - X 1648 MHz

  Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 5870

  OCZ Vertex 4 128 GB | WD Green 2 TB | WD Green 3 TB

  LG BH16NS40 Blu - Ray burner

  OCZ ZS 650W

  NZXT Lexa S

  Windows 8.1 Pro x 64

  Not too bothered about gaming performance. I don't want to spend a lot of money and the Ti 750 to about £100 seems a good balance between the value / price and performance.

  The 5870 worked very well with OpenCL and Adobe CC 2014 but for various reasons, I want to update and go back to NVIDIA.

  Thank you all

  This GPU would certainly be enough for your system, but I also would replace the Green disks with 7200 rpm disks and perhaps increase the RAM.

• After the effect CC 12.1 recognizing only not Nvidia GTX 285 for CUDA GPU rendering

  I know that it works in CS6, thank God I still installed. I don't understand, he is listed as a supported adapter specifications CC. I have the last driver/CUDA installed. Anyone have any ideas?

  

  WOOHOO a fix!

  Finally... 4 months later.

  The solution is simple, upgrade to osx 10.9.2 and the latest version of cuda.

  https://discussions.Apple.com/thread/5513535?TSTART=0

• "PP can now take full advantage of the PC with several GPU cards for export substantially accelerated time"

  On the features page Adobe clearly shows:

  Export multiple GPU support

  Premiere Pro can now take full advantage of computers with multiple GPU cards for export substantially accelerated time. Rendering and compression just got a whole lot faster.
  
  

  Can someone PLEASE be very specific as to how it works with the new 2015 CC?  I just bought my 2nd GTX 970 and SLI it had.  Now I read a lot of conflicting testimony online and can't seem to get a straight answer.  Please don't refer either items that are either outdated or forums.  Adobe CC 2015 was just released there not too long ago, which is what this new feature.
  

  Is having two 970's beneficial for first use SLI and AE?  Can I use the SLI bridge or not?   Can I turn in NVIDIA SLI Control Panel?  Or did I frankly just lose $330?

  Any educated idea would be GREATLY appreciated to help relieve this anxiety.  Thank you...

  
  
  
  

  Eric Bowen of computers ADK is frequently here on this forum, and with Bill Gehrke, can give you the best technique advises compared to your current and future workflow exact. Change style and which codecs you use are very important.

  Given that you JUST improved don't panic... There are a few simple adjustments, you can do to get the most out of your current equipment.

  1. make sure your Samsung 850 pro has ONLY your operating system, programs and Windows swap file on it... nothing more. Turn off "Indexing" for all your disks in the system. You will need a separate and quick 'reader' for ALL your other files (images, previews, projects, export, media cache and cache files). The IDEAL reader for this is the new SSD Samsung SM951 PCI, which runs more than 1.5 GB/s.  The performance is going to be super fast. the use of this drive, but its capacity is LIMITED. You would then be advised to add drive hard level of large companies 'offload' all files to the guard. These recent hard drives crashed at 200 MB/s with a 128 MB cache on them and go up to at least 6 TB of size... they are not expensive.

  2. your CPU is designed to be overclocked... TAKE ADVANTAGE of that and try to get the highest stable frequency, you can with it, ensuring that you use a good cooling solution--probably water. Performance will get a significant boost of this MOST important factor.  Of course, your CPU has "only' '8 processors" with hyperthreading from the end superior Haswell E CPUs that can give you sixteen YEARS... but, SPEED of CPU CLOCK is KING and will affect your performance because MOST of the video are processed ONLY with the CPU. NVidia GPU support will BE GREATLY whenever SPECIFIC on your timeline functions are those which can be CUDA accelerated... i. e "scaling", "ultra key", "dissolves" and a host of effects and other features. When it is the GPU CAN speed up the heavy calendar saturated with CUDA effects by a factor of TEN TIMES when "made this preview," or, "exporting media" your CPU has a stock speed of 3.6 Ghz and will be turbo up to 3.8 on all 4 cores. MANY users are overclocking your processor to a stable 4.7 Ghz... Some are more than 5 GHz! You can see that an increase of a full Ghz would give you about 20-25% performance... it's a LOT!

  It has been said here on this forum that once the processor is more than 4 GHz, it's OK even to 4K.

  However, I've ALSO seen here, (Eric, I think), that certain types of 4K really needs to have a GPU that has a minimum of 4 GB of memory DDR5 video memory due to "frame problem", or "frame buffer".    Thus, a return of the 970 s and KEEP one, (if it has 4 GB of video memory or more). Use the return to SM 951 drive.

  3. make sure all your settings are properly defined. In Windows, power settings make sure that all settings are for OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE so that Windows reduce NOT anything automatically... I learned this lesson on my laptop... the DEFAULT settings have been throttling the CPU and the GPU all the time until I fixed it!

  Then, first, make sure that you have the correct settings to allocate the amount of memory for first use... Eric has said here, it should be at least 3 GB by thread (I think... it can called ' base'...) I forgot). In YOUR case it means assign 24 GB of system memory for first, (8 'threads' x 3 = 24 GB). The rest can be defined for use in 'other programmes' of course, you can experiment and increase the amount of 3.5 or another higher.

  4. do not panic... Bill and I have the same laptops Asus who two years now with the 765 m 2 GB NVidia GPU in them and the HQ of 4700 i7 CPU. We shitcanned included and 5400 RPM hard drive and we both installed two quality SATA III SSD in each of the two hard drive bays. We also each increased the memory of the laptop to 24 GB. Bill has already done a few projects 4K basic on his laptop and I have experimented with 4K on mine. On my laptop, basic editing is not a problem with 4K, but addition of video tracks and effects slowing it... However, the chronology which fixes not making it. YOUR machine correctly overclocked, with more memory than we and a SM 951 and a GPU 970 should do very WELL at the moment... I think.   Unless you want to spend 4 to 5 $000 on a new machine of Haswell E X 99!

  p.s. If you are working with 4K and 1080 p quality, you need a couple of good monitors. I recently bought TWO 27 inch Acer IPS monitors that are WQHD, or, 2560 x 1440 p in the resolution. They were rated very high in addition to a review and are IPS... the density of pixels is IDEAL... to 27 inches, 1440 p video looks LIKE 4 K!   The quality of the color and the image is amazing. My laptop powers BOTH monitors at full resolution! We use HDMI 1.4 and the other the 'mini displayport' 1.1 connection... (which is also called Thunderbolt version 1). This monitor is only $200 on the egg, (including a $50 discount). Others in this class are 6 to 7 cents.

• Compatibility backward and ahead for accelerated by GPU video cards?

  I have Adobe first Pro CS5, and I can't find the compatible list of GPU cards for this product. However, I know that Adobe ALL products get updated periodically. So, my question is this: will be a graphics card that works with Adobe first Pro CC work on Adobe first Pro CS5 and Vice Versa? Thank you! In addition, if someone knows which are the least expensive cards video for Mercury Playback Engine-accelerating GPU for desktop computers and laptops? I would like to know! Much obliged!

  You should be able to use any NVIDIA card VRAM on CS5 with1Gb if use you the Hack CUDA:

  Piracy of CS5 for cheaper acceleration - Adobe CS5: 64-bit, accelerated by CUDA and threaded Performance

  Activate Nvidia Geforce, GPU Cuda, CS6, Adobe GPU Cuda, which is GPUVidMuze

• What video card is officially supported by Adobe for Mercury motor/GPU rendering?

  Hello

  At work, we have a couple new i7 machines that run the last CC using Adobe Premiere. Today, I noticed that the machines are made video on the CPU. There is no dedicated graphics card inside the machines that use the color first.

  We would like to buy Graphic cards for these machines to reduce rendering time.

  Question 1:

  What card is officially supported by Adobe for Mercury motor/GPU rendering?

  Question 2:

  Are supported new generation series Nvidia 1000 already? Are the new series AMD already supported (Sapphire Radeon RX 480 for example).

  Question 3:

  How our users will benefit rendering on video cards mentioned above, instead of rendering on the CPU.

  I know it will be difficult to predict because it would need more information, but I'm looking for a rough estimate that I can introduce to our users.

  Premiere Pro system requirements for Mac OS and Windows

• I get the message: Photoshop has encountered a problem with the display driver and has temporarily disabled GPU enhancements. Visit the Web site of the manufacturer of the video card for the latest version of the software.

  Photoshop has been giving me the warning:

  Photoshop has encountered a problem with the display driver and has temporarily disabled GPU enhancements. Visit the Web site of the manufacturer of the video card for the latest version of the software.

  Also other programs are affected.  I suspect a recent download of Adobe.  Can anyone HELP.

  No, it has nothing to do with updates of Adobe. There is a problem with your video card driver.

  Go directly to the Web site of the manufacturer of the GPU for updates (not Microsoft, not a System Builder).

• How is acceleration GPU of MPE is slower than software only for export on my system?

  I installed the GTX285.  Enabled acceleration GPU of MPE.  A clip has exported (source images: R3D 4 K) with encoder to 1080 (h264).  It took 41m42s to finish.
  
  I turned off acceleration GPU MPE (so now it's MPE software acceleration only). I exported the same clip with the same settings (1080, h264).  It took 35m45s.
  
  How is it that the GPU acceleration is slower by nearly 6 minutes?  All variables were the same in both cases.  Can someone please give an idea as to why this is happening?
  
  I have a quad 2010 (3.2 gHz) Mac Pro 5.0.2 PP with 10.6.5 OSX with 16 GB of RAM.

  Thank you.

  Start the Benchmark PPBM5 and PM me the results. If your configuration is correct, you would see a multiplication by 10 of the time made without MPE. It will also show how your system behaves in relation to others. Do not follow the instructions to the letter. It is the best way to check if everything is OK.

• How to properly configure a graphics card for SpeedGrade, Adobe Premiere Pro and After Effects?

  Okay, so I have the following system configuration:

  2 NVIDIA Geforce GTX 970 s

  5960 X CPU

  MSI X 99 game 7 motherboard

  32 GB DDR4 RAM

  256 GB and 1 TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD

  Basically, even if I have the whole system built together, I'm not sure how check and know whether or not Adobe Premiere Pro is in fact using the map graphic or not.  I know it has to be using some of them, otherwise it would not run correctly (as I discovered a recent experience).  However, I don't know if there is, perhaps, some settings in the NVIDIA Control Panel that must be configured so that Premiere Pro can use the card to its full potential.  Here's an example of what I'm talking about:

  

  In other words, they are (I'm sure) all of the default settings of the Control Panel applies to Premiere Pro.  However, I don't know if there are any parameters here that I should change or not.  So what I'm looking for an answer to this question:

  • What parameters, if any, should change for Premiere Pro (as well as other adobe applications that can use all the force of the 970 GTX)?
  • How can I check the GPU activity it is applied during rendering?  (For example, I can check with the Task Manager, CPU usage while I made to see that it is used at 100%).
  • If, perhaps, something goes wrong and even with the right settings, say that the card still is not fully used, what other settings can I change to ensure that the GTX 970 is fully used by Adobe first Pro/After effects/SpeedGrade CC 2014?

  If you want a reference point to measure the performance of Premiere Pro to your: drive system, GPU and CPU use our first Pro BenchMark (PPBM)

  When you finish running the test and then run the script, you will get this report

  

  In this case the result of my laptop (with a GTX 765 M GPU and SSD drives)

  1. The disk performance are explicit.
  2. Number 2 is a very complex timeline of seven layers with heavy assistance from CPU and GPU, without hardware acceleration GPU (processor only) should be longer than 1350 seconds.
  3. Three above is a measure of a chronology exaggerated using many, many GPU MPE accelerated effects and characteristics using a GPU to 99% of load (54 seconds above) and an export-only CPU of the same timeline (802 seconds).

  If you want to compare your results to others, that you need to register on the site PPBM7 to see the results.

  EDIT! I corrected the number 2 above originally, I said 900 seconds, but he was really longer than 1350 seconds

• What is the best graphic card for after effect

  Hello
  my graphics card is not supported for after effect. I'll buy a new one and I would like to know what is the best
  Thank you

  There is never a simple answer for such a question, but:
  List of cards supported for 3D Ray Tracing in AE, you will find it here: after effects configuration required for Mac OS and Windows

  More information on NVidia: Adobe after effects CC - 3D Graphics workflow | NVIDIA

  But to be honest, most of the nvidia graphics cards will work with AE - ELA easier - more Cuda cores better.
  But before you spend a lot of money for the high GPU know AE uses mainly from CPU to GPU rendering is not so important. It uses the GPU only for RayTracing (obsolete)

  and some third-party plug-ins.

• Graphics card for Adobe first Pro CC 2014 compatibility

  Hello

  I am a reseller of Australia and our customer asked a powerful computer with s GTX780 graphics card that is on the compatible list on the

  " " Recommended AMD and NVIDIA graphics for the GPU acceleration cards" link on this site Adobe Premiere Pro system requirements

  Our distributors have recommended the GTX780 is stopped and I need to get another card with similar specs and around the same pricing chart.

  Someone out there a recommendation of what model would be a good substitute?

  I appreciate all the comments.

  Kind regards

  Alicia Bird

  First supports almost any CUDA/OpenCL modern map - see: http://blogs.adobe.com/premierepro/2013/06/adobe-premiere-pro-cc-and-gpu-support.html

  So even if maps as the 980 GTX (which is in fact the latest version of the 780) aren't on the official-configuration page required - they will work well.

• have problems with hardware acceleration of rendering: fonts looks terrible

  have problems with hardware acceleration of rendering (integrated gpu: amd 760 g) of one of the latest nightly updates - police seem terrible http://i.imgur.com/kWnySVv.png

  Note that the gfx.content.azure.enabled pref has more effect and you can try to disable Direct2D by setting the pref gfx.direct2d.disabled true on the subject: config page and leave hardware acceleration enabled otherwise.

  See also commentary 414 in bug 812695:

  • https://Bugzilla.Mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812695#C414

  This way you still have the advantage of hardware acceleration, but can not suffer rendering problems.