Cisco 867VAE configuration issues - does no routing between LAN & WAN

Similar Questions

• GANYMEDE + with 3560 cisco switch configuration issue

  Hi Forum,

  Here's my setup GANYMEDE + on my cisco 3560 switch and my question is, how can I configure the switch, if I would not type enable after I put the user name and password? with configs below, users will need to type activate whenever they connect to the switch in order to enter the user exec mode. Please let me know if there is something missing in my configs to help me avoid typing 'enable '.

  Thanks in advance,

  MacBookAir: ~ MacBook$ ssh [email protected]/ * /.

  Password:

  Switch > en

  Switch #show run | include the aaa

  AAA new-model

  AAA server Ganymede group + mpcc

  AAA authentication login default group Ganymede + local

  activate the default AAA authentication no

  AAA authorization exec default group Ganymede + authenticated if

  AAA authorization commands 1 default group Ganymede + authenticated if

  AAA authorization commands 15 default group Ganymede + authenticated if

  start-stop radius group AAA accounting dot1x default

  AAA accounting exec default start-stop Ganymede group.

  orders accounting AAA 1 by default start-stop Ganymede group.

  orders accounting AAA 15 by default start-stop Ganymede group.

  AAA accounting system default start-stop Ganymede group.

  AAA server RADIUS Dynamics-author

  AAA - the id of the joint session

  Switch #.

  Hello

  Add the level of privilege 15 control VTY line configuration.

   line vty 0 4 [..] privilege level 15 ! 

  Concerning

• Routing between LANs on X 0 and X 2

  I configured X 2 with a separate static IP X 0 and trying to get the subnet behind X 0 to communicate with the subnet behind X 2. For starters, I can't even a response from the X 2 IP address ping during the ping from a position on the X 0 subnet or even from the SonicWall diagnostic page.

  Package monitor reveals my ICMP packets are dropped due to a firewall rule, but I can't say who, or what it will take to allow packets between two subnets.

  I've worked a bit with the creation of a LAN-> firewall rule of LAN for all sources of ports/services all IP of destination X 2, then destination all IP interface, but still no response. I tried a firewall rule, all services/ports since a post on the X 0 LAN at all and still nothing

  It takes what firewall rule to allow traffic between my two subnets?

  If you try to ping IP address X 2 of X 0 field, you will need to add a ping management rule.

  LAN > LAN

  X 0 subnet > X 2 all IP management via Ping

• Routing between networks in a configuration of quartering of its assets-

  Hi all

  This old chestnut again...

  I've recently upgraded to LM 3 to (mostly) take advantage of the built-in network features that have been proposed.

  However, I am still struggling with this: http://communities.vmware.com/message/946079#946079

  I have experimented with it in the new version just a little, but can not find a way to put several networks (physical or virtual) in a ring-fenced and then totally blocked configuration routing between them (WITHOUT using a virtual, multi-homed routing device). Things are certainly much easier, being able to manage all interfaces through the console of LM is much simpler, but the response to the post linked above suggests that I would be able to deliver in a transparent manner... (at the time, I thought the questioned was an employee of VMWare, but I could be wrong)?

  Thanks in advance.

  Your struggle is partially valid.  Lab Manager 3 manages several networks, but it will not address the routing between networks by itself.  You have two options:

  (1) do what you do - creating multihomed VMs to route between networks.  Now, you won't have to use VC to all do this.  Capture library and fenced deployment now works without manual effort on the side.

  (2) create multiple physical networks, road between them using hardware network and technical deployment on them.  "Block the entrance and exit" would be enforced by the deployment on the production completely independent physical networks.

  Steven

• Want to use internet to share WRV210 router between two LANs

  Hello

  I have the following scenario:

  A LAN has access to internet via ADSL through a Fortigate 50B (192.168.100.0)

  A new LAN (different segment) that should have access to the internet. (192.168.102.0)

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves.

  We have a WRV210 router between two LANs (192.168.100.0 WAN, 192.168.102.0 on LAN) configured in router mode.

  Resources work very well, but internet does not work.

  We receive answers internet addresses on 192.168.102.0 ping and tracert works very well, but we cannot navigate or connect to Skype, msn msg, etc..

  We made on fortigate 50B routes this way:

  192.168.102.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.100.102 internal

  192.168.100.102 is an address WAN WRV210

  We tried the gateway mode and internet works fine on 192.168.102.0, but 192.168.100.0 cannot contact 192.168.102.0 resources (obviously)

  What can be wrong in case of ping and tracert works very well, but nothing else works?

  Hi Willy,.

  You need the WRV210 in not the router mode gateway mode.

  Gateway mode active Stateful inspection, which will address translation from private to public IP addresses and NAT....

  "But I think that the VLAN on the router segments members to talk to other members on the other vlan, so your comment.

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves. "creates a problem.

  .

  A community previous publication says "with Port Based VLAN on the WRV210, there is no VLAN tagging and so on." It's more like say port 1 not to talk to port 2, because they are on separate physically designated VLAN (even if on the same subnet) and it is far as it goes. But with your configuration you want also to have the 2nd SSID do not talk to any wired client based on the RVS4000 as well? If so, this facility would not work because all wireless clients would be able to talk to cable customers and vice versa. But if you primary concern is simply to prevent the SSID 1 speaking with 2 SSID, it's doable in the page VLAN for the WRV210.

  So if you want the WRV210 to allow switching between the VLAN port basis, it won't work the way it is set up now...

  If you want to restrict access between IP hosts, I suggest using the list feature to access a managed switch that focuses on the PC or servers.  A switch may be as a series of 200 or 300 small businesses switch, see URL below...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10898/prod_models_comparison.html

  But then allow all ports to be a member of the VLAN by default.  I hope that I read your question correctly

  Best regards, Dave

• Help! Static route between two router WRT160NL

  Hi all

  I have my internet connection to connect to my main router from Linksys WRT160NL (192.168.1.1) with 192.168.1.x.

  My 2nd Linksys router to connect to the first gateway as well.
  The 2nd router has the ip 192.168.1.100 WAN and it's a local subnet as 192.168.2.x.

  My 192.168.2.x machines can access the internet and connect to all the machines in the network 192.168.1.x.

  However, the 1.x network cannot access the machines on the network of the 2. And because of that, I can't share or print between two networks.

  I try to add static routes on my main router (192.168.1.1) with the road: 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 and default gateway 192.168.1.100

  However, the road does not work yet.

  in any case to ensure that the 1.x network able to access the network 2.x and 2.x access 1.x file and print sharing.

  Thanks for your help!

  Gateway of the router does NAT who made the side inaccessible side LAN WAN, unless you configure port forwarding automatic or similar. If she would not make your LAN 192.168.1 would be accessible from the internet. Static routing will not change that.

  You will need to disable NAT (aka switch to router mode) on the second router. You must configure a static route on the main router then. However, most likely your network 192.168.2 * will not have Internet more because the main router will NAT for 192.168.1. * and no 192.168.2. *.

  If possible set up the second router as access point only and run a LAN.

• vSphere vSwitch configuration issue

  I'm currently building a multiclient environment with two ESXi hosts in a data center. A SAN will come eventually if I want to start my basic with this thought in mind build before implemented. When comes the SAN, I just plug it in and not have to re-architect my network.

  I use a switch 24 ports of Cisco 2960 S, 1 of my ESXi hosts has 4 network cards and the other has 8 network cards. I don't know that I will NOT use the VMware vDistributed switch.

  The conversation I did with people, I am told I can't achieve any type of aggregation of links on the end of things Cisco and simply let VMware manage everything that LB/ft. I'm open to any argument on this point that I do not take a position be it.

  Since it is a multiple tenant environment, I am curious about vSwitch/PortGroup design with security in mind.

  #1 can I paste all network cards to a single vSwitch and use several groups of ports for each VLAN? It would be a safe method to keep the traffic between the VLANS segmented?

  #2 instead create a vSwitch for each VLAN and paste the appropriate vSwitch? (looks like a waste of the physical NIC for me)

  #3 should I allow all the VLANS or just specify those I want to pass through (security of mind is thought specify)

  More traffic will take place in the VLAN and WAN, maybe 5% of the traffic will be routed between the VLANS (I read that routing between vSwitches would have on my firewall if between two vSwitches)

  It will hit my Sonicwall firewall that has 6 network adapters. I thought that I would use two network cards on the Sonicwall assigned to different VLANS on my different vSwitches or exchanges (according to the method I). I know the side of the config of the Sonicwall well enough, but I want to keep all traffic to occur on the Cisco 2960 S if it resides on any network on this switch.

  Good,

  So until you have multi tenant VM isolated with no communication between them, you have two options.  (Option 1).  Take advantage of your physics of switching / VLAN / and Firewall to create the speration and control.  (Option 2).  Use PVLANS.

  If you want more information on PLANS to let me know and I'll send you a link to another post I did which addresses in detail about this.

  With this ISC here any visio drawing VERY fast just to get what you want to do.

  Diagram1

  

  Diagram2

  

  Digram3

  

  OK, so moving forward with your setup your life / configuration will be much easier if you could get 6-8 network interface cards on your first host that currently has 4 network cards, however if you can not lets talk about how you get to do what you want.

  Let's start with your ESXi host at 8 cards just to get the idea everywhere so the address that with 4 network cards then.

  So, you will want to create 3 vSwitches:

  (1.) one for management and vMotion this switch will have 2 vmnic assigned for all external communications

  (2.) one for iSCSI with 2 vmnic assigned for the multipath

  3.) for the virtual computer network and all the other networks, you will need for isolation / multi-tenent 4 network cards for the traffic of the virtual machine.  Feel free to borrow this switch network cards if you need it for other purposes

  Now as every vmnic on all vswitchs will be several VLANS through them, you will need to the trunk ports on the physical switch and tag all the VLANS which could pass these network cards. For example, management - VLAN 10, vMotion - VLAN 20 times will go on vmnic0 and or vmnic1.  If the ports that these network cards to connect must be resources shared with vlan 10 and 20 tag on them.  If you have other questinos on this topic let me know

  Ditto for iSCSI however group in the vSwitch iSCSI, most people put the ports in the access mode, which essentially qui essentiellement definit defines just one vlan to everything that is connected to this port by default so you don't require to a VLAN on the port

  Now for all VM networks.  Each of them will be have their own network and VLAN.  In defining a VLAN and a separate network, you can set each one to a different gateway which will your Sonicwall.  Your sonic wall you can create itineraries and or firewall rules to prohibit traffic between networks ect.  If you have any questinos on let me know.

  Now to get your SIN for talking to your virtual machine natively for backup and without going through a data store, you s VM you want this to happen to have two virtual network adapters.  On the normal network on what you want and another on the network backup Nas which will route to the NAS.

  Now for the ESXi host with 4 network cards, you will have more or less the same, the only difference is that your vSwitch0 will do more work that you will have all your networks routing VM, vMotion and ESXi management.  So you have to tag VLAN on ports these network cards work on your physical switch.

  If your planning to your NAS instead of iSCSI you NFS will be limited to only 1 GB throughput and would probably want to watch 10 GB nic if that is the case.  Anyway if that's what you want I would like to know or do not hesitate to ask.

  Also, it would really be a good idea to get a second switch, so you do not have a single point of failure.  CurrentY if you let go of that switch is down and you don't want that once you get a another switch you would simply divide all the vmnic redundent through two switches, both vmnic0 - switch1, vmnic1 - switch2.

  I hope this has helped, let us know if you have any questions.  No this is set in stone is just a quick drawing in order to give you some ideas on how you want to configure everything.

• AirDrop does not work between Mac mini end of 2014 and 6 s iPhone more

  Hello!

  I'm here for the first time. A little more last year, I bought a Mac mini end of 2014 with Core i5 clocked at 2.6 GHz, 8 GB RAM and 5400 RPM HARD drive. I replaced the HDD for an SSD, Samsung EVO 850 250 GB, to be correct. I also have an iPhone 6 Plus and does not AirDrop between my devices. They discover each other. Update both OS X and iOS on a regular basis, so that's not the problem. Check on this issue and finding a solution a have met this Airdrop is not my Mac mini 2012 and I have a few questions:

  I checked that TRIM Enabler Coulon, but later on my Mac I searched this Samsung EVO can't GARNISH. What it means? Download and install TRIM Enabler would be unnecessary, because the problem isn't here? Everything is fine with the Bluetooth, WiFi, my 6s more connects to the other MacBook Pro Retina early 2015, as the new MacBook 12 "iPads and iPhones, too. Please help me, thank you in advance.

  10.10.4 and later Apple does not allow that you caraa select TRIM and third part SSD. See:

  http://osxdaily.com/2015/10/29/use-trimforce-trim-SSD-Mac-OS-x/

  Can yo test to see if AirDrop works among other devices?

  like the iPhone with another device iOS or Mac or Mac with another Mac or iOS device?

• RVS4000 routing between VLAN static?

  Hello

  I was wondering if the RVS4000 allows a static routing between the VLANS.  I would like to have three VLANS, one for my cable system, one for my wireless network and one for my print server.  I want the two VLAN Wi - Fi and to be able to get to the virtual LAN print server, but do not want the Wi - Fi and VLAN to react reciprocally.  Is it possible to put up with this router without the need of additional routers or a layer 3 switch.  Thanks in advance for any advice that anyone can give.

  By default, the VLAN is entirely routed. You do not have to configure routing between VLANs. What to put in place the filter. You must filter the traffic, which you don't want to pass between the VLANS. Set up the ACL according to the needs.

• WRT54GX4 - difficulties to access the configuration Page of the router Web-based

  WRT54GX4 - difficulties to access the configuration Page of the router Web-based.

  I have tried all posted to forums and knowledge for several weeks now with no luck.  I can feed the router to push and access the router's web-based interface, but only for a few minutes that she was leaving the loading to half way through and or does not load.  If I turn on the wireless side I can access the router at will without any problem. My warranty is almost over. I'm at my wits end. I would like to replace it under warranty if I can. (^ 8.

  Update: I fell up on top of the fix for my problem. After many reconfigurations over the past two months I've tried turn on all newspapers. Since the age of the newspaper I did have a problem of access to my router.

• VCD 5.1 routing between VCC-org-network

  Hello

  I want to route between two vapps in the Organization of two different vdc network. I found information on the guide of 5.1 admin vcloud, but it is not very clear on the external ip address of the network of the Organization of vdc.

  Example from vcloud 5.1 administration guide:

  External IP address of the router network network name specification
  VAPP 1 network 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.100
  VAPP 2 Network 192.168.11.0/24 192.168.10.100
  Org vDC 1 network 192.168.0.0/24 10.112.205.101
  Org VDC 2 network 192.168.10.0/24 10.112.205.100

  Where can I find the addresses 10.112.205.100 and 101?

  Thank you

  Dominic

  Gateway, properties, configure the IP settings

  or gateway, external IP allocations

• Routing between 2 vswitches

  Hello

  In my lab at home, I have the following configuration:

  vSwitch0 - physical adapter connected to the router (192.168.1.x)

  vSwitch1 - no physical (10.0.0.x) cards

  All my VM to sit on vSwitch1. I had to do it this way to get a PXE boot works fine in my lab.

  My problem is that I can't connect to one of my machines on vswitch1 my 192.168.1 network.

  What is the best way to be able to do this? I know that I could probably hold a windows in there server and RRAS only, but it would be a waste of resources. Is there an easier way?

  Hello

  VSwitches of VMware are autonomous entities that do not allow for Stackable Switch. In order to connect two vSwitches you need to use a lightweight virtual machine that acts as a firewall/router. There are several that you can choose as Vyatta, Smoothwall, IPCop, etc..

  Or use your idea RRAS.

  The device, which he is never, has 2 vNIC, each connected to one of the vSwitches in use. I.e.

  A vSwitch => Portgroup A-online [vNIC A - VM - vNIC B]<=Portgroup><=vSwitch>

  The virtual machine becomes the router between the switches.

  Best regards

  Edward L. Haletky

  Host communities, VMware vExpert,

  Author: VMware vSphere and Virtual Infrastructure Security,VMware ESX and ESXi in the 2nd business edition

  Podcast: the Podcast for security virtualization of resources: the virtual virtualization library

• Routing between two network cards

  I have 8 fiber switches that are configured to use a private network for management.

  The subnet is 192.168.8.0/24.

  I have a W2K3 (SERVER A) server with two NICS, a NIC (192.168.8.1) is attached to

  the 192.168.8.0 subnet and the other (192.168.100.14) NETWORK adapter is attached to the subnet 192.168.100.0/24.

  I put up two persistent routes of road between these NICS using the following commands:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  I have an other W2K3 server (SERVER B) with a single NETWORK (192.168.100.12) card that must be able

  to connect with the fiber switches via tcp/ip. Packets should be routed to this server.

  On that I put in place a permanent route:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Everything works very well.

  (Assumes that the SERVER-A and SERVER B are now turned off)

  I'm trying to reproduce this on my VMware ESX Server 3.5upd3.

  ESX server has two NICS, one attached to each of the subnets. I create a virtual machine to replace SERVER-a

  with the same number of network cards and the same IP addresses.

  I then create routes as follows:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  PROBLEM: as soon as I add the second route I can no longer ping any server on the 192.168.100.0 subnet.

  This also causes connections to last very long.

  Do I need to implement routing between network adapters ESX scale to make this work?

  If so maybe want the command look like? If not, what could be my problem?

  Thank you for the helpful answers

  If you want to configure your machine as a router, you will need to notify the router is the next hop.  Now, the next machine break is its own interfaces, which will not work.  And since you are running some sort of routing protocol, provide two solutions to exit the server is not a good idea, because he doesn't know that one to use.  It will use 1 for some and another for some.

  Do what you intend (or I think you intend), you must delete the static routes and choose a default route, which will be your next jump.  This should be another router in your environment.  Then, the other servers that you want to route via ServerA, ServerA interface on this segment would remind you.

  Hope that makes sense.

  -KjB

• Parachute does not not between iOS and Mac devices... Does anyone have a good solution for it nor a lot of garbage to support

  Parachute does not not between iOS and Mac devices... Does anyone have a good solution for it nor a lot of garbage to support

  You want the solution? Why not tell us what Mac and Apple, mobile devices you have the OS and version?

  Also what troubleshooting steps you took?

  We do not have a crystal ball, and we're not sitting next to you.

• How to lock my iPhone 6's screen so it does not move between portrait and landscape?

  How to lock my iPhone 6's screen so it does not move between portrait and landscape?

  Select portrait orientation lock.

  Swipe the top of your home screen to access the control center and select the icon with a lock and an arc around him.