VCD 5.1 routing between VCC-org-network

Similar Questions

• How to make a route between two routers (networks) connected to the same switch?

  Hello guys, how are you?

  In my company, we have 2 internet routers more dsl router of data connected to 1 switch line

  the data row is used to connect the branches of our company together for network problems.

  the router 192.168.2.1 IP data

  internet routers IP 192.168.1.1 - 57.194.97.1

  We have 3 accesspoints wireless taking their internet of 192.168.1.1 oky guy

  what I want to do is when I connect to any wireless network to connect to the data line dsl with router 192.168.2.1

  When I use the ethernet on my pc I have IP addresses 192.168.2.222 for router data line and 192.168.1.222 for internet

  but the wireless is DHCP n that it is connected only to 192.168.1.1, which is the internet router, how can I do 192.168.1.1 192.168.2.1 when I connect

  using the wireless?

  I hope that you understand me ^_^

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  The question you posted would be better suited to the TechNet community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/w7itpro/

  Hope this information is useful.

• Routing between vApps in the same ORG

  Am I right in understanding that the only way to route between vApps in the ORG even is manually by creating static routes?

  I have the static routing options under VAPP networks but not under ORG networks. The documentation says that there should be a static routing tab, but the single tab I have is DHCP. Y at - it a step that I missed somewhere?

  Thank you!!

  Ahh ok, if its isolated, you can't do that sort of thing.  Precisely, the docs say you can with a net org of this type?

• Routing between two network cards

  I have 8 fiber switches that are configured to use a private network for management.

  The subnet is 192.168.8.0/24.

  I have a W2K3 (SERVER A) server with two NICS, a NIC (192.168.8.1) is attached to

  the 192.168.8.0 subnet and the other (192.168.100.14) NETWORK adapter is attached to the subnet 192.168.100.0/24.

  I put up two persistent routes of road between these NICS using the following commands:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  I have an other W2K3 server (SERVER B) with a single NETWORK (192.168.100.12) card that must be able

  to connect with the fiber switches via tcp/ip. Packets should be routed to this server.

  On that I put in place a permanent route:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Everything works very well.

  (Assumes that the SERVER-A and SERVER B are now turned off)

  I'm trying to reproduce this on my VMware ESX Server 3.5upd3.

  ESX server has two NICS, one attached to each of the subnets. I create a virtual machine to replace SERVER-a

  with the same number of network cards and the same IP addresses.

  I then create routes as follows:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  PROBLEM: as soon as I add the second route I can no longer ping any server on the 192.168.100.0 subnet.

  This also causes connections to last very long.

  Do I need to implement routing between network adapters ESX scale to make this work?

  If so maybe want the command look like? If not, what could be my problem?

  Thank you for the helpful answers

  If you want to configure your machine as a router, you will need to notify the router is the next hop.  Now, the next machine break is its own interfaces, which will not work.  And since you are running some sort of routing protocol, provide two solutions to exit the server is not a good idea, because he doesn't know that one to use.  It will use 1 for some and another for some.

  Do what you intend (or I think you intend), you must delete the static routes and choose a default route, which will be your next jump.  This should be another router in your environment.  Then, the other servers that you want to route via ServerA, ServerA interface on this segment would remind you.

  Hope that makes sense.

  -KjB

• Routing between networks in a configuration of quartering of its assets-

  Hi all

  This old chestnut again...

  I've recently upgraded to LM 3 to (mostly) take advantage of the built-in network features that have been proposed.

  However, I am still struggling with this: http://communities.vmware.com/message/946079#946079

  I have experimented with it in the new version just a little, but can not find a way to put several networks (physical or virtual) in a ring-fenced and then totally blocked configuration routing between them (WITHOUT using a virtual, multi-homed routing device). Things are certainly much easier, being able to manage all interfaces through the console of LM is much simpler, but the response to the post linked above suggests that I would be able to deliver in a transparent manner... (at the time, I thought the questioned was an employee of VMWare, but I could be wrong)?

  Thanks in advance.

  Your struggle is partially valid.  Lab Manager 3 manages several networks, but it will not address the routing between networks by itself.  You have two options:

  (1) do what you do - creating multihomed VMs to route between networks.  Now, you won't have to use VC to all do this.  Capture library and fenced deployment now works without manual effort on the side.

  (2) create multiple physical networks, road between them using hardware network and technical deployment on them.  "Block the entrance and exit" would be enforced by the deployment on the production completely independent physical networks.

  Steven

• vCloud 1.5 Org Networking internal and external IP

  Hello

  I build a vcloud environment and one of the requirements of our team is that they can for their workstations RDP in their VMs within vCloud. Each Member of the team will have several copies of the same virtual machines that are running in several TIME that needs to be closed because of obvious name conflicts since all machines will be identical.

  What Type of Org network I create to accomplish this requirement?

  

  

  

  We have this configuration by creating a network within the vApp and assignment of an address 192.168.10.xxx to each of the virtual machine inside the vApp.  We use an external-Direct network between the network of vApp and organizational network with a Pool of IP to assign NAT IP addresses for the external face of the VSE (virtual router) and each virtual computer inside the vApp.  This allows the virtual machine is talking to eachother through the 192.168.10.0 network and is accessible from desktop users through the external IP address assigned.

  We save the network inside the vApp settings so our users not to modify them when they deploy a copy of their cloud.

  I hope this helps.

  Eric

• RVS4000 routing between VLAN static?

  Hello

  I was wondering if the RVS4000 allows a static routing between the VLANS.  I would like to have three VLANS, one for my cable system, one for my wireless network and one for my print server.  I want the two VLAN Wi - Fi and to be able to get to the virtual LAN print server, but do not want the Wi - Fi and VLAN to react reciprocally.  Is it possible to put up with this router without the need of additional routers or a layer 3 switch.  Thanks in advance for any advice that anyone can give.

  By default, the VLAN is entirely routed. You do not have to configure routing between VLANs. What to put in place the filter. You must filter the traffic, which you don't want to pass between the VLANS. Set up the ACL according to the needs.

• Want to use internet to share WRV210 router between two LANs

  Hello

  I have the following scenario:

  A LAN has access to internet via ADSL through a Fortigate 50B (192.168.100.0)

  A new LAN (different segment) that should have access to the internet. (192.168.102.0)

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves.

  We have a WRV210 router between two LANs (192.168.100.0 WAN, 192.168.102.0 on LAN) configured in router mode.

  Resources work very well, but internet does not work.

  We receive answers internet addresses on 192.168.102.0 ping and tracert works very well, but we cannot navigate or connect to Skype, msn msg, etc..

  We made on fortigate 50B routes this way:

  192.168.102.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.100.102 internal

  192.168.100.102 is an address WAN WRV210

  We tried the gateway mode and internet works fine on 192.168.102.0, but 192.168.100.0 cannot contact 192.168.102.0 resources (obviously)

  What can be wrong in case of ping and tracert works very well, but nothing else works?

  Hi Willy,.

  You need the WRV210 in not the router mode gateway mode.

  Gateway mode active Stateful inspection, which will address translation from private to public IP addresses and NAT....

  "But I think that the VLAN on the router segments members to talk to other members on the other vlan, so your comment.

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves. "creates a problem.

  .

  A community previous publication says "with Port Based VLAN on the WRV210, there is no VLAN tagging and so on." It's more like say port 1 not to talk to port 2, because they are on separate physically designated VLAN (even if on the same subnet) and it is far as it goes. But with your configuration you want also to have the 2nd SSID do not talk to any wired client based on the RVS4000 as well? If so, this facility would not work because all wireless clients would be able to talk to cable customers and vice versa. But if you primary concern is simply to prevent the SSID 1 speaking with 2 SSID, it's doable in the page VLAN for the WRV210.

  So if you want the WRV210 to allow switching between the VLAN port basis, it won't work the way it is set up now...

  If you want to restrict access between IP hosts, I suggest using the list feature to access a managed switch that focuses on the PC or servers.  A switch may be as a series of 200 or 300 small businesses switch, see URL below...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10898/prod_models_comparison.html

  But then allow all ports to be a member of the VLAN by default.  I hope that I read your question correctly

  Best regards, Dave

• Understand the Options on vDC Org Network Wizard

  I'm trying to understand how to create my vDC org network.  I have a dashboard for the org device and I want to create an org NAT network was behind the gateway.

  The first screen of the wizard is obvious, but the second 'Network Configuration' screen has some things I don't understand.

  (1) the gateway address?  What is c?  I guess that means the NIC inside on the edge, but how do I know this is as intellectual property.  I do not think that I have configured or something.  The evaluation guide that I'm following shows 10.0.0.1 for this... it's an arbitrary choice?  This is the default value?

  (2) a static range of IP addresses?

  Once again the assessment guide shows the distribution of 100-199 customers in the 10.x.x.x network, but I don't know if it's a defect?  Or simply a placeholder?  How to decide what to wear?

  Thanks in advance,

  Chad

  Technically, there are 3 types of network Org (really 2 and which is a variation on both).

  1 direct external Org network

  If you put a virtual computer on it, it goes straight to the external network.  It takes an IP address of the external pool and happening just with her.

  2 isolated Org network

  You basically 'make up' a network.  This will not have external access... If you attach a virtual machine to the network, it can communicate with any other VM on this exact network.

  3 routed Org network

  It's like #2, but with a vShield gateway that would be created.  This vShield edge would fill the functions of your "default gateway".  Think of this as a great private network, or a massive NAT from n to 1.

  If you just want to give a lot of people internet access, you can make virtual computers here and do a firewall rule to allow all outbound traffic and put it in a single IP address (that would come from your external network).

  RE: 1 - it is a value within the network you define.  Let's say we want as our gateway to be 10.150.10.1 on a 23... When you create it from the bridge that will take an IP address internal network of 10 -.150.10.1

  RE: 2 - it is just a range to assign the MV, put on the network.  say 10.150.10.100 - 10.150.254.  These will become IPs vCloud will delegate to the NETWORK card of the computer virtual they are created.

• How a VAPP user could get the Info org-network through the REST API?

  Hi all

  I can get the org-network when I use the system administrator use the REST url "/ api/org", but when I use a VAPP user, may not work properly.

  Then I try to config user VAPP role permission and give him the permition operating organization. The answer is STILL no network-org Info too

  What should I do?

  Respect of

  Hello

  VAPP users are not allowed to see the org above their visibility networks. They are allowed to see the networks VAPP.
  Org networks are visible to the user 'administrator of the Organization ". If you want you can see the permissions of the role "Administrator of the Organization" and create role with the org network of related rights, which will be tailored to your needs. You can also change the role of 'paralytic' adding rights for ' Org networks-> view/edit properties "and"organization-> view organization networks. This can be done as easily in the user interface of vCD.

• Routing between 2 vswitches

  Hello

  In my lab at home, I have the following configuration:

  vSwitch0 - physical adapter connected to the router (192.168.1.x)

  vSwitch1 - no physical (10.0.0.x) cards

  All my VM to sit on vSwitch1. I had to do it this way to get a PXE boot works fine in my lab.

  My problem is that I can't connect to one of my machines on vswitch1 my 192.168.1 network.

  What is the best way to be able to do this? I know that I could probably hold a windows in there server and RRAS only, but it would be a waste of resources. Is there an easier way?

  Hello

  VSwitches of VMware are autonomous entities that do not allow for Stackable Switch. In order to connect two vSwitches you need to use a lightweight virtual machine that acts as a firewall/router. There are several that you can choose as Vyatta, Smoothwall, IPCop, etc..

  Or use your idea RRAS.

  The device, which he is never, has 2 vNIC, each connected to one of the vSwitches in use. I.e.

  A vSwitch => Portgroup A-online [vNIC A - VM - vNIC B]<=Portgroup><=vSwitch>

  The virtual machine becomes the router between the switches.

  Best regards

  Edward L. Haletky

  Host communities, VMware vExpert,

  Author: VMware vSphere and Virtual Infrastructure Security,VMware ESX and ESXi in the 2nd business edition

  Podcast: the Podcast for security virtualization of resources: the virtual virtualization library

• Traffic no routing between remotes using ezVPN with NEM

  I scoured the forums for a while now, looking for ways to solve this one but just can't find anything that helps.  I ezVPN configured on an ASA 5520 for my server with 5505 s like my clients at several remote sites.  The tunnels go up without a problem and I can hit what I need on both sides of the tunnel, but I'm not able to go to another remote network from a remote network.  Traffic shuts down the tunnel on the 5505, but on the 5520 I don't see is a bunch of scrolling tear down messages.  Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

  Side hub

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  nameif Inside_Network

  security-level 100

  the IP 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/3

  nameif Outside_Network

  security-level 0

  IP 192.168.32.8 255.255.255.0

  !

  permit same-security-traffic inter-interface

  !

  Router eigrp 10

  Network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0

  redistribute static

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ikev1 my - set esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto-map dynamic ezvpn 30 set transform-set my - set ikev1

  Crypto-map dynamic ezvpn 30 the value reverse-road

  map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic ezvpn

  outside_map Outside_Network crypto map interface

  Crypto ikev1 enable Outside_Network

  IKEv1 crypto policy 10

  preshared authentication

  aes-256 encryption

  sha hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  !

  internal VPN_GP group policy

  VPN_GP group policy attributes

  VPN-idle-timeout no

  allow to NEM

  !

  username password encrypted Wj0QXCAEhK12A5Sp privilege 0 vpnuser

  !

  VPN Tunnel-group type remote access

  General-attributes of VPN Tunnel-group

  Group Policy - by default-JEOD_VPN_GP

  Group-tunnel VPN ipsec-attributes

  IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.

  Remote side - more than necessary here

  vpnclient Server 192.168.32.8

  vpnclient mode network-extension-mode

  vpnclient vpngroup VPN password *.

  vpnclient nickname vpnuser password *.

  vpnclient enable

  EzVPN remote clients can connect to the Headend ASA5520 but cannot communicate with each other. Is it correct to understanding?

  All guests of EzVPN are end on a different external physical interface of the ASA? If not, we will have to allow intra-interface traffic too with inter-UI that is same-security-traffic permit intra-UI.

• Possible to add an org network to an existing paralytic

  Hi is it possible to add another network to an existing VAPP? How is that possible?

  Hello

  You can always add Org network to an existing paralytic... even if the vApp is running...

  All you need to do is Open the VAPP (NOT THE VM!) and select the network icon add from there...

  It will show you a dialog box where you can select what type of network you want to...

  Comment cela Although you will be able to add the netowrk, you will not be able to connect to the virtual machine if the vApp is turned on...

  So you will have to turn off the vApp, connect the virtual machine to the N/W Org, then turn on the TIME...

  hope this helps :-)

  Yohan

  (If this was helpful, pls assign points!)

• Network Guest traffic is routed to the external network (LAN)

  I think this is a basic question, but I couldn't find a clear answer in blogs, so thank you for your patience.

  We want to make sure that all Guest network traffic is routed through our physical network.  Configuration: VMs are contained in several groups of ports that are 'under' a unique vSwitch.  The vSwitch is associated with a physical NETWORK adapter, and each group of Port represents a different subnet.

  It's all each guest traffic goes through the physical NIC to our physical network (routers, etc.), including traffic from customers who are in the same group of Port/subnet?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Steve

  VSwitches function as physical switches. .so if 2 virtual computers are ion the same ESX host and in the same subnet, there is no need of any traffic go via your physical network.

  Of course, if the virtual machines are on different ESX hosts, traffic must go physical interrrupteurs to reach the destination addresses.

• private routing within a cloud network

  I created a network supported by isolation for an org to use.

  I had a single network to not work on servers esx, no problem.

  However, when I create a server on another subnet routing can't.

  so my question is how do I get routing to the internal working of an org?

  You can not.  Sustained Isloation is layer 2 Mac-to-Mac and therefore cannot be routed unless you go outside by a vShield edge do the routing.  Supported by the networks are by definition insulation layer 2 only inside an Org, but between hosts on the same dVSwitch.  Routing requires either an edge vShield to bridge sustained isolation internal and external network or other devices, but by default it is layer 2 by definition.