Routing between 2 vswitches

Similar Questions

• RVS4000 routing between VLAN static?

  Hello

  I was wondering if the RVS4000 allows a static routing between the VLANS.  I would like to have three VLANS, one for my cable system, one for my wireless network and one for my print server.  I want the two VLAN Wi - Fi and to be able to get to the virtual LAN print server, but do not want the Wi - Fi and VLAN to react reciprocally.  Is it possible to put up with this router without the need of additional routers or a layer 3 switch.  Thanks in advance for any advice that anyone can give.

  By default, the VLAN is entirely routed. You do not have to configure routing between VLANs. What to put in place the filter. You must filter the traffic, which you don't want to pass between the VLANS. Set up the ACL according to the needs.

• Want to use internet to share WRV210 router between two LANs

  Hello

  I have the following scenario:

  A LAN has access to internet via ADSL through a Fortigate 50B (192.168.100.0)

  A new LAN (different segment) that should have access to the internet. (192.168.102.0)

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves.

  We have a WRV210 router between two LANs (192.168.100.0 WAN, 192.168.102.0 on LAN) configured in router mode.

  Resources work very well, but internet does not work.

  We receive answers internet addresses on 192.168.102.0 ping and tracert works very well, but we cannot navigate or connect to Skype, msn msg, etc..

  We made on fortigate 50B routes this way:

  192.168.102.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.100.102 internal

  192.168.100.102 is an address WAN WRV210

  We tried the gateway mode and internet works fine on 192.168.102.0, but 192.168.100.0 cannot contact 192.168.102.0 resources (obviously)

  What can be wrong in case of ping and tracert works very well, but nothing else works?

  Hi Willy,.

  You need the WRV210 in not the router mode gateway mode.

  Gateway mode active Stateful inspection, which will address translation from private to public IP addresses and NAT....

  "But I think that the VLAN on the router segments members to talk to other members on the other vlan, so your comment.

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves. "creates a problem.

  .

  A community previous publication says "with Port Based VLAN on the WRV210, there is no VLAN tagging and so on." It's more like say port 1 not to talk to port 2, because they are on separate physically designated VLAN (even if on the same subnet) and it is far as it goes. But with your configuration you want also to have the 2nd SSID do not talk to any wired client based on the RVS4000 as well? If so, this facility would not work because all wireless clients would be able to talk to cable customers and vice versa. But if you primary concern is simply to prevent the SSID 1 speaking with 2 SSID, it's doable in the page VLAN for the WRV210.

  So if you want the WRV210 to allow switching between the VLAN port basis, it won't work the way it is set up now...

  If you want to restrict access between IP hosts, I suggest using the list feature to access a managed switch that focuses on the PC or servers.  A switch may be as a series of 200 or 300 small businesses switch, see URL below...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10898/prod_models_comparison.html

  But then allow all ports to be a member of the VLAN by default.  I hope that I read your question correctly

  Best regards, Dave

• Routing between vApps in the same ORG

  Am I right in understanding that the only way to route between vApps in the ORG even is manually by creating static routes?

  I have the static routing options under VAPP networks but not under ORG networks. The documentation says that there should be a static routing tab, but the single tab I have is DHCP. Y at - it a step that I missed somewhere?

  Thank you!!

  Ahh ok, if its isolated, you can't do that sort of thing.  Precisely, the docs say you can with a net org of this type?

• VCD 5.1 routing between VCC-org-network

  Hello

  I want to route between two vapps in the Organization of two different vdc network. I found information on the guide of 5.1 admin vcloud, but it is not very clear on the external ip address of the network of the Organization of vdc.

  Example from vcloud 5.1 administration guide:

  External IP address of the router network network name specification
  VAPP 1 network 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.100
  VAPP 2 Network 192.168.11.0/24 192.168.10.100
  Org vDC 1 network 192.168.0.0/24 10.112.205.101
  Org VDC 2 network 192.168.10.0/24 10.112.205.100

  Where can I find the addresses 10.112.205.100 and 101?

  Thank you

  Dominic

  Gateway, properties, configure the IP settings

  or gateway, external IP allocations

• Routing between two network cards

  I have 8 fiber switches that are configured to use a private network for management.

  The subnet is 192.168.8.0/24.

  I have a W2K3 (SERVER A) server with two NICS, a NIC (192.168.8.1) is attached to

  the 192.168.8.0 subnet and the other (192.168.100.14) NETWORK adapter is attached to the subnet 192.168.100.0/24.

  I put up two persistent routes of road between these NICS using the following commands:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  I have an other W2K3 server (SERVER B) with a single NETWORK (192.168.100.12) card that must be able

  to connect with the fiber switches via tcp/ip. Packets should be routed to this server.

  On that I put in place a permanent route:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Everything works very well.

  (Assumes that the SERVER-A and SERVER B are now turned off)

  I'm trying to reproduce this on my VMware ESX Server 3.5upd3.

  ESX server has two NICS, one attached to each of the subnets. I create a virtual machine to replace SERVER-a

  with the same number of network cards and the same IP addresses.

  I then create routes as follows:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  PROBLEM: as soon as I add the second route I can no longer ping any server on the 192.168.100.0 subnet.

  This also causes connections to last very long.

  Do I need to implement routing between network adapters ESX scale to make this work?

  If so maybe want the command look like? If not, what could be my problem?

  Thank you for the helpful answers

  If you want to configure your machine as a router, you will need to notify the router is the next hop.  Now, the next machine break is its own interfaces, which will not work.  And since you are running some sort of routing protocol, provide two solutions to exit the server is not a good idea, because he doesn't know that one to use.  It will use 1 for some and another for some.

  Do what you intend (or I think you intend), you must delete the static routes and choose a default route, which will be your next jump.  This should be another router in your environment.  Then, the other servers that you want to route via ServerA, ServerA interface on this segment would remind you.

  Hope that makes sense.

  -KjB

• Routing between networks in a configuration of quartering of its assets-

  Hi all

  This old chestnut again...

  I've recently upgraded to LM 3 to (mostly) take advantage of the built-in network features that have been proposed.

  However, I am still struggling with this: http://communities.vmware.com/message/946079#946079

  I have experimented with it in the new version just a little, but can not find a way to put several networks (physical or virtual) in a ring-fenced and then totally blocked configuration routing between them (WITHOUT using a virtual, multi-homed routing device). Things are certainly much easier, being able to manage all interfaces through the console of LM is much simpler, but the response to the post linked above suggests that I would be able to deliver in a transparent manner... (at the time, I thought the questioned was an employee of VMWare, but I could be wrong)?

  Thanks in advance.

  Your struggle is partially valid.  Lab Manager 3 manages several networks, but it will not address the routing between networks by itself.  You have two options:

  (1) do what you do - creating multihomed VMs to route between networks.  Now, you won't have to use VC to all do this.  Capture library and fenced deployment now works without manual effort on the side.

  (2) create multiple physical networks, road between them using hardware network and technical deployment on them.  "Block the entrance and exit" would be enforced by the deployment on the production completely independent physical networks.

  Steven

• Reduce the traces of routing between vias

  With the help of Ultiboard and I'm curious to know if there is a setting in the motorway use, to reduce trace a path to go between vias in a PLUNGE? Or is redraw manually the copper trace the best method? See attached file...

  TKS, Terry

  TCjr,

  Is there a reason that you don't want the tracks to go under the DIP?

  (a) If you need create a specialized for certain signals routing path (as non-DIP), I recommend that send you these tracks manually first after the placement of the part.

  (b) you can also place a narrow rectangular restricted area (and the automatic router must comply with the permitted/prohibited gave you) [in Ultiboard menu, place-> Keep-in/Kee-out area].  Keep out of the area by default prevents any trace routing through a particular area.  If you don't want to keep everything out, first specify you a group net and then adjust the properties of the area to make the Dungeon to be applied to the net group only.

  So it is possible, but only a few traces, it may be too much for what you do.

  Kind regards

  Pat Noonan

  National Instruments

• Help! Static route between two router WRT160NL

  Hi all

  I have my internet connection to connect to my main router from Linksys WRT160NL (192.168.1.1) with 192.168.1.x.

  My 2nd Linksys router to connect to the first gateway as well.
  The 2nd router has the ip 192.168.1.100 WAN and it's a local subnet as 192.168.2.x.

  My 192.168.2.x machines can access the internet and connect to all the machines in the network 192.168.1.x.

  However, the 1.x network cannot access the machines on the network of the 2. And because of that, I can't share or print between two networks.

  I try to add static routes on my main router (192.168.1.1) with the road: 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 and default gateway 192.168.1.100

  However, the road does not work yet.

  in any case to ensure that the 1.x network able to access the network 2.x and 2.x access 1.x file and print sharing.

  Thanks for your help!

  Gateway of the router does NAT who made the side inaccessible side LAN WAN, unless you configure port forwarding automatic or similar. If she would not make your LAN 192.168.1 would be accessible from the internet. Static routing will not change that.

  You will need to disable NAT (aka switch to router mode) on the second router. You must configure a static route on the main router then. However, most likely your network 192.168.2 * will not have Internet more because the main router will NAT for 192.168.1. * and no 192.168.2. *.

  If possible set up the second router as access point only and run a LAN.

• Routing between two VLANs on a switch in series SG300

  I've seen a lot of messages from people with problems of traffic between the two routing VLANS with some complex examples.  Can someone show a simple example for a SG300 switch (in layer 3 mode) to set up the two VLAN and send the traffic between VLANS without an external router?

  VLAN1 10.10.10.0

  VLAN2 10.10.20.0

  I tried to do through the UI and can't seem to make it work.  It seems that it must be very simple, so maybe I'm missing something in the GUI.

  Hi Chris,

  I did 5 minutes of recording that showed how I configured the two VLAN on my SG300 switch and layer 3-switched between the VLANS.

  You have no trouble getting to the GUI, so you will have no difficulty to setup in a few minutes...

  • Be sure to use the latest version of the SG300 package, with a bearable CLI.
  • to save your changes to the configuration at the end of the process.
  • the IP addresses that you create will be the address of default gateway for PC hosts on VLANs specified.
  • Recording can be interrupted at any time to perform configuration operations.

  Recording is now available on the website of the WebEx service. Click on the link below to read:

  https://Cisco.WebEx.com/ciscosales/LSR.php?at=PB&SP=MC&rID=55688352&RKEY=05e1fc5fff0d05da

  Configuration of VLAN

  Monday, October 24, 2011 11:02 New York time

  5 minutes

  Have fun

  Best regards, Dave

• Redistribution of Routes between OSPF and EIGRP

  We have a network of test with the topology below.  We have two networks connected to a L3 switch.  Both networks have an ASA firewall with a tunnel from site to site between them.  They also have a connection in conjunction with each other.  We want to implement a scenerio where the concert connection is the main route but if that route fails, then it switches to the routethat is above the tunnel from site to site.  We have eigrp running on two basic switches so that the roads on the concert connection function properly.  However Networking cannot be learned on the second road that goes over the vpn tunnel.  We have running ospf on the asa and we are redistrubuting routes in eigrp.  Which apparently correct?  Look like the SAA they learn on ospf routes correctly however when we go to basic switches and show ip eigrp topology we do not see the routes possible successor.  Any ideas on how to make this work?

  

  Hello

  The initial Setup looks that you have summarized automatic enabled on core switches, also to the asa eigrp process your redistribution measures doesn't look right about the delay/load/reliability-whats the reasoning behind this? Could you try the following:

  Switch main 1 & 2

  Router eigrp 100

  No Auto-resume

  ASA 1 & 2

  Router eigrp 100

  Redistribute ospf 1 100000 1 255 1 1500 metric

  Could you also post the out-of - show ip eigrp topology all-links

  RES

  Paul

  Please do not forget to note all messages that have been useful.

  Thank you.

• Routing between VLANS in one direction

  OK... so I don't know if I can do this, but I'd like some input cases possible.

  Network equipment - RV120W, SF300-24

  VLAN10--> switch in VLAN, internet access - preferably just 3 addresses

  VLAN20--> switch in VLAN, initiate connection with VLAN10, VLAN30, access internet (I realize that there is a risk to security, but inevitable)

  VLAN30--> switch in VLAN can access internet

  VLAN40--> Internet access only, can not pass

  I the installation of circuits between the devices and assigns him VLAN quite easily, I'm not sure how (or if its possible) to create routing tables / settings to accomplish.  I am not able to do this on a SF300, but some tips you would know - even if I accomplish only part of what would be ideal.

  Hello Smith,

  I suggest the creation of access list (ACL based IPv4) for your configuration (assuming you do your routing inter - VLAN on the switch). If you are routing inter - VLAN on the RV120W, you may need to create the list of access on the router instead.

  See the article on more details on the ACL on SF300:

  Configure lists of access based on IPv4 on the 200/300 series managed switches

  Thank you

  Vijay

  Please note the answers.

• Routing between two remote sites connected over the VPN site to site

  I have a problem ping between remote sites.  Now the Cryptography and no nat ACL's for different sites just to affect traffic between the remote site and main site. I tried to add roads, adding other subnets to the crypto and no. ACL Nat at the remote sites... nothing worked.  Any ideas?

  Main site:

  192.168.100.0 - call manager / phone VLAN

  192.168.1.0/24 - data VLAN

  Site 1:

  192.168.70.0/24 - phone VLAN

  192.168.4.0/24 - data VLAN

  Site 2:

  192.168.80.0/24 - phone VLAN

  192.168.3.0/24 - data VLAN

  Main router

  Expand the IP ACL5 access list
  10 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255
  20 ip 192.168.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255
  30 permits ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.100.0 allow 40 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255)
  50 permit ip 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255
  Expand the IP ACL6 access list
  10 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255
  20 ip 192.168.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
  30 permits ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.100.0 allow 40 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

  Expand the No. - NAT IP access list
  10 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255
  20 deny ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255
  30 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255
  40 deny ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
  320 ip 192.168.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any
  IP 192.168.100.0 allow 330 0.0.0.255 any

  Site 1:

  ACL5 extended IP access list

  IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

  ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255

  No. - NAT extended IP access list

  deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

  refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

  ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 any

  Site 2:

  ACL6 extended IP access list
  IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
  ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
  ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255
  No. - NAT extended IP access list
  deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any
  ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 any

  What should I do for these two sites can ping each other?  I looked through the forums but can't seem to find someone with a similar problem, which has received a definitive answer.

  Thanks in advance!

  Hi, I assume that you need site 1 and 2 to communicate with each other via the main site right? If this is the case, then you need to set add the following lines to your ACL crypto:

  Main router

  Expand the IP ACL5 access list

  IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

  ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

  ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

  Expand the IP ACL6 access list

  IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

  Make sure you add these lines before the last permit

  Expand the No. - NAT IP access list

  deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

  refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  Site 1:

  ACL5 extended IP access list

  IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

  ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  Make sure that these lines are added before the last permit

  No. - NAT extended IP access list

  deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

  refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

  Site 2:

  ACL6 extended IP access list

  IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

  ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

  ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

  So make sure that these lines are added before the last permit

  No. - NAT extended IP access list

  deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

  So you're saying good enough your routers with these definitions which will be reached via one main remote sites (sites 1 and 2).

  I would like to know if this is what you need.

• Routing between the easy VPN clients

  I have easy installation of multiple ASA5505 as VPN clients connecting to a single ASA5510 and can route packets between client subnets easy 5505. Anyone has the clues, how?

  Thank you!

  You must add the below to the 5510: -.

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  HTH >

• 1841 can route between tunnel GRE and IPSEC tunnel?

  Hello everyone!

  See the image below.

  Main office (10.0.1.0/24 LAN) and branch (10.0.2.0/24 LAN) are connected through the GRE tunnel.

  The third office (10.0.3.0/24) is attached to the second branch via IPSEC.

  Is there the way to establish the connection between the third and the main office through cisco 1841?

  Is it possible to perform routing, perhaps with NAT?

  In fact we need connection with a single server in the main office.

  Thank you

  Hello

  It is possible to build this configuration.

  the IPSEC connection between 10.0.3.x and 10.0.2.x should also encapsulate the traffic to main office.

  Steps to follow:

  Central office, to shift traffic to 10.0.3.x above the GRE tunnel.

  The second part, add the 10.0.3.x - 10.0.1.x selection of traffic to the ACL IPSEC with the third

  The third part, add the 10.0.3.x - 10.0.1.x selection of traffic to the ACL IPSEC with the second pane.

  Please rate if this helped.

  Kind regards

  Daniel