Cisco and Checkpoint VPN clients on a single PC
Hello
I'm in the following fix:
I had used customer Checkpoint SecuRemote 4.1 SP - 5 VPN in the past.
Now, I have installed the Cisco VPN client version 4.0.4 on my PC to access IPSec VPN for the PIX in our headquarters.
According to Cisco VPN release notes http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/vpn/client/rel404/404clnt.htm#wp1346340 , it should be possible to have clients both Cisco and Checkpoint VPN installed on the same machine.
But I am not able to connect to my PIX, I receive the following error message:
"Secure the complete VPN connection locally by the Client.
Reason 403: failed to contact the security gateway. »
When I'm looking for signs of PC control-> system-> hardware-> device Administration-> network cards, I can see Cisco Systems VPN Adapter disabled.
After you activate manually, I always get the same error when you try to connect to the Cisco VPN client.
After PC restart the Cisco VPN adapter is disabled later.
I tried to uncheck Check Point SecuRemote form my Dial-up connection (bypassing CSCea31192 of bug, but the bug does not affect NAT - T connection which I use).
I noticed the same situation on three different computers, one running Windows XP, both running Windows 2000.
After uninstalling the client Checkpoint completely (including Windows registry manual removal), the Cisco VPN client works very well.
It seems to me, therefore, that there is a profound mismatch between Cisco and Checkpoint VPN clients.
Does anyone know of a workaround?
Thank you
Milan
We had the same problem with some of our users who need to use the two clients to connect to customer sites.
If I remember the cisco client does not start automatically, but the client of checkpoint 4.1 don't.
We by-passed by deleting the registry entry point control that starts the client at startup. fwenc.exe is the entrance and it is in
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run
After that make a shortcut to the executable file that is stored in the directory \bin to relevant checkpoint on the client (it is different from NT & 9 client x) and then only start when it is necessary.
Hope that's a help
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
Problem router Cisco and Checkpoint VPN
Hello
I couldn't establish vp from site to site between cisco and checkpoint. Can you please check the logs?
Thank you.
* 29 sept 08:17:22.627: IPSEC (sa_request):,.
(Eng. msg key.) Local OUTGOING = Y.Y.Y.Y:500, distance = X.X.X.X:500,
local_proxy = 192.168.222.0/255.255.255.0/256/0,
remote_proxy = 10.0.10.0/255.255.255.0/256/0,
Protocol = ESP, transform = esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac (Tunnel),
lifedur = 3600 s and KB 4608000,
SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 256, flags = 0 x 0
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): profile of THE request is (NULL)
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: created a struct peer X.X.X.X, peer port 500
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: new created position = 0x88AD1AB0 peer_handle = 0 x 80000004
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x88AD1AB0, refcount 1 to peer isakmp_initiator
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): insert his with his 88AF7D94 = success
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): cannot start aggressive mode, try the main mode.
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): pre-shared key found peer corresponding X.X.X.X
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-rfc3947 ID
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-07 ID NAT - t
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-03 IDexit
Router (config) #n
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-02 ID NAT - t
* 08:17:22.631 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_MM
* 08:17:22.631 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_I_MM1* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): Beginner Main Mode Exchange
* 29 sep 08:17:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): package to X.X.X.X my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending MM_NO_STATE
* 08:17:22.631 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): a Packet.o IKE IPv4 send* 29 sep 08:17:32.631: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
* 29 sep 08:17:32.631: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 1 5: retransmit the phase 1
* 29 sep 08:17:32.631: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE
* 29 sep 08:17:32.631: ISAKMP: (0): package to X.X.X.X my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending MM_NO_STATE
* 08:17:32.631 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): sending of a CPVPN IKE IPvaccess lists* 29 sep 08:17:42.631: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
* 29 sep 08:17:42.631: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 2 of 5: retransmit the phase 1
* 29 sep 08:17:42.631: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE
* 29 sep 08:17:42.631: ISAKMP: (0): package to X.X.X.X my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending MM_NO_STATE
* 08:17:42.631 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE...
* 29 sep 08:17:52.627: IPSEC (key_engine): request timer shot: count = 1,.
local (identity) = Y.Y.Y.Y:0, distance = X.X.X.X:0,
local_proxy = 192.168.222.0/255.255.255.0/256/0,
remote_proxy = 10.0.10.0/255.255.255.0/256/0
* 29 sept 08:17:52.627: IPSEC (sa_request):,.
(Eng. msg key.) Local OUTGOING = Y.Y.Y.Y:500, distance = X.X.X.X:500,
local_proxy = 192.168.222.0/255.255.255.0/256/0,
remote_proxy = 10.0.10.0/255.255.255.0/256/0,
Protocol = ESP, transform = esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac (Tunnel),
lifedur = 3600 s and KB 4608000,
SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 256, flags = 0 x 0
* 29 sep 08:17:52.627: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE
* 29 sep 08:17:52.627: ISAKMP: (0): SA is still budding. Attached new request ipsec. (local Y.Y.Y.Y, distance X.X.X.X)
* 29 sep 08:17:52.627: ISAKMP: error during the processing of HIS application: failed to initialize SA
* 29 sep 08:17:52.627: ISAKMP: error while processing message KMI 0, error 2.
* 29 sep 08:17:52.631: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
* 29 sep 08:17:52.631: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 3 of 5: retransmit the phase 1
* 29 sep 08:17:52.631: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE
* 29 sep 08:17:52.631: ISAKMP: (0): package to X.X.X.X my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending MM_NO_STATE
* 08:17:52.631 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
* 29 sep 08:18:02.631: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
* 29 sep 08:18:02.631: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 4 out 5: retransmit the phase 1
* 29 sep 08:18:02.631: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE
* 29 sep 08:18:02.631: ISAKMP: (0): package to X.X.X.X my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending MM_NO_STATE
* 08:18:02.631 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
* 29 sep 08:18:12.631: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
* 29 sep 08:18:12.631: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 5 of 5: retransmit the phase 1
* 29 sep 08:18:12.631: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE
* 29 sep 08:18:12.631: ISAKMP: (0): package to X.X.X.X my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending MM_NO_STATE
* 08:18:12.631 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
* 29 sep 08:18:22.627: IPSEC (key_engine): request timer shot: count = 2,.
local (identity) = Y.Y.Y.Y:0, distance = X.X.X.X:0,
local_proxy = 192.168.222.0/255.255.255.0/256/0,
remote_proxy = 10.0.10.0/255.255.255.0/256/0
* 29 sep 08:18:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
* 29 sep 08:18:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): the peer is not paranoid KeepAlive.* 29 sep 08:18:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): removal of reason ITS status of 'Death by retransmission P1' (I) MM_NO_STATE (peer X.X.X.X)
* 29 sep 08:18:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): removal of reason ITS status of 'Death by retransmission P1' (I) MM_NO_STATE (peer X.X.X.X)
* 29 sep 08:18:22.631: ISAKMP: Unlocking counterpart struct 0x88AD1AB0 for isadb_mark_sa_deleted(), count 0
* 29 sep 08:18:22.631: ISAKMP: delete peer node by peer_reap for X.X.X.X: 88AD1AB0
* 29 sep 08:18:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): node-930113685 error suppression FALSE reason 'IKE deleted.
* 29 sep 08:18:22.631: ISAKMP: (0): error suppression node 661004686 FALSE reason 'IKE deleted.
* 08:18:22.631 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL
* 08:18:22.631 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM1 = IKE_DEST_SA* 29 sep 08:18:22.631: IPSEC (key_engine): had an event of the queue with 1 KMI message (s)
* 29 sept 08:18:27.559: IPSEC (sa_request):,.
(Eng. msg key.) Local OUTGOING = Y.Y.Y.Y:500, distance = X.X.X.X:500,
local_proxy = 192.168.222.0/255.255.255.0/256/0,
remote_proxy = 10.0.10.0/255.255.255.0/256/0,
Protocol = ESP, transform = esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac (Tunnel),
lifedur = 3600 s and KB 4608000,
SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 256, flags = 0 x 0
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: (0): profile of THE request is (NULL)
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: created a struct peer X.X.X.X, peer port 500
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: new created position = 0x85EDF1F0 peer_handle = 0 x 80000005
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x85EDF1F0, refcount 1 to peer isakmp_initiator
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: find a dup her to the tree during the isadb_insert his 88C1CE60 = call BVA
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: (0): cannot start aggressive mode, try the main mode.
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: (0): pre-shared key found peer corresponding X.X.X.X
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-rfc3947 ID
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-07 ID NAT - t
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-03 ID
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-02 ID NAT - t
* 08:18:27.559 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_MM
* 08:18:27.559 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_I_MM1* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: (0): Beginner Main Mode Exchange
* 29 sep 08:18:27.559: ISAKMP: (0): package to X.X.X.X my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending MM_NO_STATE
* 08:18:27.559 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
* 29 sep 08:18:37.559: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
* 29 sep 08:18:37.559: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 1 5: retransmit the phase 1
* 29 sep 08:18:37.559: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE
* 29 sep 08:18:37.559: ISAKMP: (0): package to X.X.X.X my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending MM_NO_STATE
* 08:18:37.559 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
* 29 sep 08:18:47.559: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
* 29 sep 08:18:47.559: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 2 of 5: retransmit the phase 1
* 29 sep 08:18:47.559: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE
* 29 sep 08:18:47.559: ISAKMP: (0): package to X.X.X.X my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending MM_NO_STATE
* 08:18:47.559 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.* 29 sep 08:18:57.559: IPSEC (key_engine): request timer shot: count = 1,.
local (identity) = Y.Y.Y.Y:0, distance = X.X.X.X:0,
local_proxy = 192.168.222.0/255.255.255.0/256/0,
remote_proxy = 10.0.10.0/255.255.255.0/256/0
* 29 sept 08:18:57.559: IPSEC (sa_request):,.
(Eng. msg key.) Local OUTGOING = Y.Y.Y.Y:500, distance = X.X.X.X:500,
local_proxy = 192.168.222.0/255.255.255.0/256/0,
remote_proxy = 10.0.10.0/255.255.255.0/256/0,
Protocol = ESP, transform = esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac (Tunnel),
lifedur = 3600 s and KB 4608000,
SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 256, flags = 0 x 0
* 29 sep 08:18:57.559: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE
* 29 sep 08:18:57.559: ISAKMP: (0): SA is still budding. Attached new request ipsec. (local Y.Y.Y.Y, distance X.X.X.X)
* 29 sep 08:18:57.559: ISAKMP: error during the processing of HIS application: failed to initialize SA
* 29 sep 08:18:57.559: ISAKMP: error while processing message KMI 0, error 2.
* 29 sep 08:18:57.559: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
* 29 sep 08:18:57.559: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 3 of 5: retransmit the phase 1
* 29 sep 08:18:57.559: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE
* 29 sep 08:18:57.559: ISAKMP: (0): package to X.X.X.X my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending MM_NO_STATE
Router #.
Router #.
* 08:18:57.559 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
* 29 sep 08:19:07.559: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
* 29 sep 08:19:07.559: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 4 out 5: retransmit the phase 1
* 29 sep 08:19:07.559: ISAKMP: (0): transmit phase 1 MM_NO_STATE
* 29 sep 08:19:07.559: ISAKMP: (0): package to X.X.X.X my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending MM_NO_STATE
* 08:19:07.559 Sept. 29: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
Router #.
Router #un all
All possible debugging has been disabledThe log shows main mode setup has failed. See if this helps: http://www.itcertnotes.com/2011/04/ipsec-stuck-in-mmsasetup-and-mmnostat...
-
Windows IPSEC and SSL VPN client on the same machine
Matches (coexistence) installation of IPSEC and SSL vpn clients that are supported on the same computer, windows (XP and Win7)?
As mentioned by Patricia and Jennifer (5 stars), you can install two clients on the same machine without any problem.
The tricky part comes when you are trying to connect two clients at the same time, that's when you may encounter unexpected problems.
However, if your intention is to install both clients and connect them individually and not at the same time, you'll be fine.
If you have any other questions, please mark this question as answered and note all messages that you have found useful.
Thank you.
Portu.
Post edited by: Javier Portuguez
-
UC500 and IPsec VPN client - disconnects
Just throw a question out there.
I have a UC560 running uc500-advipservicesk9 - mz.151 - 2.T2 site HQ. Remote users, about 8 of them, attempt to connect via IPsec VPN (v5.0.07.0440) HQ clients to access files, etc.. The behavior I see is 5 users to connect successfully, but only 5. As soon as more users trying to connect, they have either:- connect with success for a minutes, then unmold
- get a 412, remote peer is not responding
- connect, but someone of another session kickoff.
Users use the same VPN profile, but with names of single user and passwords.
Here are some of the CPU configs for VPN clients
Configuration group customer crypto isakmp USER01
key *.
DNS 192.168.0.110
pool USER01_POOL
ACL USER01_ACLlocal RAUTHEN AAA authentication login
permission of AAA local RAUTHOR network authenticated by FISCrypto isakmp USER01_PROF profile
match of group identity USER01
list of authentication of client RAUTHEN
RAUTHOR of ISAKMP authorization list.
client configuration address respondcrypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA 3des
md5 hash
preshared authentication
Group 2
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA aes
preshared authentication
Group 2
lifetime 28800
crypto ISAKMP policy 100
BA aes
preshared authentication
Group 2
life 3600
crypto ISAKMP policy 1000
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2I enabled debugging
Debug crypto ISAKMP
Debug crypto ipsecHere are some of the things that I see on him debugs
604899: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 284724149
604900: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): treatment protocol NOTIFY DPD/R_U_THERE 1
0, message ID SPI = 284724149, a = 0x8E7C6E68
604901: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): error suppression node 284724149 FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1.
604902: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_INFO_NOTIFY
604903: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE581504: 16:59:12.805 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): purge the node-1455244451
581505: 16:59:12.805 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): purge the node 840814618
581506: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP (2147): received 201.195.231.162 packet dport 4500 sport 37897 Global (R) QM_IDLE
581507: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: node set 801982813 to QM_IDLE
581508: 20 August 16:59:13.933: ISAKMP: (2147): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 801982813
581509: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: receives the payload type 18
581510: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): treatment remove with load useful reason
581511: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove the doi = 0
581512: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove Protocol id = 1
581513: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove spi_size = 16
581514: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove the spis num = 1
581515: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): delete_reason = 2
581516: 20 August 16:59:13.933: ISAKMP: (2147): load DELETE_WITH_REASON, processing of message ID = 801982813, reason: DELETE_BY_USER_COMMAND
581517: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): peer does not paranoid KeepAlive.581518: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): peer does not paranoid KeepAlive.
581519: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): removal of State of SA reason 'Order BY user' (R) QM_IDLE (post 201.195.231.162)
581520: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): error suppression node 801982813 FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1.
581521: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: node set-878597687 to QM_IDLE
581522: 20 August 16:59:13.937: ISAKMP: (2147): lot of 201.195.231.162 sending peer_port my_port 4500 37897 (R) QM_IDLE
581523: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
581524: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): purge the node-878597687
581525: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL
581526: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_DEST_SAI opened a case with TAC on this and they do not understand what is the cause. For them, it looks like a bug without papers. And their recommendation is to reboot, upgrade or try configuring L2TP for remote users.
Thank you
JP
JP,
An update of IOS is worth it, even if him debugs seems to indicate that there is a problem with the client. If possible, I always suggest test with another client to see if it is unique to the Cisco VPN Client on Win7. Regarding the limit of 20 tunnel, it is very probably the number of IPsec security associations. If you issue a 'show crypto eli', this example displays the number of Sessions that are currently active IPSec.
HTH,
Frank
-
Hello
I set up a lab for RA VPN with a version of the ASA5510 8.2 and VPN Client 5 software using digital certificates with Microsoft CA on a Windows 2003 server. I did the configuration based on this document from Cisco's Web site:
Now, the vpn works fine, but now I need to configure a tunnel-different groups so I can provide different services to different users. The problem I have now is that I don't know how to set it up for the certificate is the name of tunnel-group. If I do an ASA debug crypto isakmp I get this error message:
% ASA-713906 7: IP = 165.98.139.12, trying to find the group through OR...
% 3 ASA-713020: IP = 165.98.139.12, no group found by matching well payload ID: unknown
% ASA-713906 7: IP = 165.98.139.12, trying to find the group via IKE ID...
% 3 ASA-713020: IP = 165.98.139.12, no group found by matching well payload ID: unknown
% ASA-713906 7: IP = 165.98.139.12, trying to find the group via IP ADDR...
% ASA-713906 7: IP = 165.98.139.12, trying to find the group using default group...
% ASA-713906 7: IP = 165.98.139.12, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroupSo, basically, when using certificates I connect always VPN RA only with the group default DefaultRAGroup. Do I have to use a model of different web registration for application for a certificate instead of the user model? How can I determine the OU on the user certificate so that match tunnel-group?
Please help me!
Kind regards
Fernando Aguirre
You can use the group certificate mapping feature to map to a specific group.
This is the configuration for your reference guide:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/docs/security/ASA/asa82/configuration/guide/IKE.html#wp1053978
And here is the command for "map of crypto ca certificate": reference
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/command/reference/C5.html#wp2186685
Hope that helps.
-
Cisco 2621 to VPN client problem
If I ping on the client to the network (behind the router), debug displays the client encryption and decryption of the router. The ping will not, because the router is not encrypt and so the customer is not getting anything to decrypt.
The Setup is a bit different because the default route is within the network, as it is not the regular internet gateway. I have to add routes for pointing the customer who logs on the internet. Also, one machine uses this as a gateway (using a routemap). To troubleshoot, I removed the routemap custom without result. I think to change the default route, but I don't see how this would have on it.
Any ideas? Am I missing something?
Cisco 2621 12.2 (15) T running to the latest version of the client.
username password XXX 7 XXXXXX
AAA new-model
!
AAA authentication login userauthen local
AAA authorization groupauthor LAN
AAA - the id of the joint session
IP subnet zero
!
!
audit of IP notify Journal
Max-events of po verification IP 100
!
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 3
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
!
Configuration group customer crypto isakmp XXXX
key XXXXX
pool ippool
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac RIGHT
!
Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10
Set transform-set RIGHT
!
map clientmap client to authenticate crypto list userauthen
card crypto clientmap isakmp authorization list groupauthor
client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer
10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap
!
!
interface Loopback1
192.168.254.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
IP address 200.x.x.x 255.255.x.x
no ip proxy-arp
NAT outside IP
automatic duplex
automatic speed
clientmap card crypto
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
the IP 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
no ip proxy-arp
IP nat inside
route CUSTOMGATE card intellectual property policy
automatic duplex
automatic speed
!
IP local pool ippool 10.172.10.100 10.172.10.200
IP nat inside source map route sheep interface FastEthernet0/0 overload
no ip address of the http server
no ip http secure server
IP classless
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.30
access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.172.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 100 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
username password XXX 7 XXXXXX
AAA new-model
!
AAA authentication login userauthen local
AAA authorization groupauthor LAN
AAA - the id of the joint session
IP subnet zero
!
!
audit of IP notify Journal
Max-events of po verification IP 100
!
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 3
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
!
Configuration group customer crypto isakmp XXXX
key XXXXX
pool ippool
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac RIGHT
!
Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10
Set transform-set RIGHT
!
map clientmap client to authenticate crypto list userauthen
card crypto clientmap isakmp authorization list groupauthor
client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer
10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap
!
!
interface Loopback1
192.168.254.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
IP address 200.x.x.x 255.255.x.x
no ip proxy-arp
NAT outside IP
automatic duplex
automatic speed
clientmap card crypto
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
the IP 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
no ip proxy-arp
IP nat inside
route CUSTOMGATE card intellectual property policy
automatic duplex
automatic speed
!
IP local pool ippool 10.172.10.100 10.172.10.200
IP nat inside source map route sheep interface FastEthernet0/0 overload
no ip address of the http server
no ip http secure server
IP classless
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.30
IP route 20.x.x.x 255.255.255.255 200.x.x.x (it is here to let him speak to the customer)
access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.172.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 100 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 110 deny host ip 10.0.0.73 10.1.0.0 0.0.0255
access-list 110 permit ip 10.0.0.73 host everything
!
CUSTOMGATE allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 110
IP 200.x.x.x next value break
!
sheep allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 100
!
!
CUSTOMGATE allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 110
IP 200.x.x.x next value break
!
sheep allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 100
!
Add at least:
> Route ip 10.172.10.0 255.255.255.0 200.x.x.x
to force the traffic for VPN clients on the external interface. also make sure you hav a route for the clients IP address (not the VPN negotiated one) that also indicates the external interface.
The fact that the router is not encrypt means that it is not even see the responses from the inside, hosts, which indicates that your internal network is not a road to 10.172.10.0 pointing to this router, OR the router receives responses but sends them back out inside interface which will be set by the first route, I mentioned above.
-
Cisco and Checkpoint - no selected proposal
Hello
We had a working IPSEC VPN between router IOS and Checkpoint FW group. Now, after you add host entries in the ACL, we did get "no selected proposal.
My question:
=> Can we use more than an entry in an ACL, attached to a card encryption?<>
Like this for example:
access-list 125 allow ip 172.17.17.160 0.0.0.31 4.72.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 125 allow ip 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31 4.72.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 125 allow ip 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31 host 4.14.6.243
access-list 125 allow ip 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31 host 4.50.50.4
access-list 125 allow ip 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31 host 4.26.13.5
...
Hi Richi
Hi Richi,
Yes, you can use more than one ACL entry, but the ACL must be symmetric across the VPN.
Thus, for example
access-list 125 allow ip 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31 host 4.26.13.5
should be on the other side:
access-list 125 permit host ip 4.26.13.5 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31
Have you checked that you have symmetrical access lists?
It will be useful,
Paulo
-
Can I connect a PC with easy vpn client with a vpn service module 6500?
Are there examples in the Web?
Take a look at the following link as there some configuration examples that should help you.
http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/LAN/cat6000/cfgnotes/78_14459.htm
-
No Ping response from Site to Site connection between 876 of Cisco and CheckPoint Firewall
Hello!
We try to create a Site-to-Site - connection IPSec between a Cisco 876 (local site) and a control-firewall station (remote site). Cisco 876 is not directly connected to the internet, but it is behind a router ADSL with port-forwarding, redirection of ports 500 and 4500. The configuration of the Cisco 876 running is attached to this thread. Unfortunately, I get no results when debugging the connection with the command "debug crypto isakmp" and "debug crypto ipsec".
From the point of view of Checkpoint firewall the connection seems to be implemented, but there is no response from ping.
The server in the local site to be achieved since the network behind the firewall Checkpoint has a routing entry "PEI route add [inside the ip-net Remote] 255.255.255.0 [inside the premises of intellectual property]" (see also annex current config name ip addresses).
Establishing a VPN Cisco Client connection to the same router Cisco 876 works very well.
Any help would be much appreciated!
Jakob J. Blaette
Hi Jakob,
Add my two cents here.
You should always verify that the following ports and Protocol are open:
1 - UDP port 500--> ISAKMP
2 - UDP port 4500--> NAT - T
3-protocol 50---> ESP
A LAN-to-LAN tunnel will never establish a TCP session, but it could use NAT - T (if behind a NAT). Remember that a single translation isn't a port forwarding, a LAN-to-LAN tunnel is not good unless you have a one-to-one translation of the NATted device, which I think, in your case the router is working.
HTH.
Portu.
Please note all useful messages and mark this message as a response.
-
Cisco asa anyconnect vpn client mode issue
Hi team,
I get my users anyconnect vpn connection failures very frequently and it that comesup.
Can you please check see the version attached and explain, if I run with licenses right into place.
concerning
SecIT
Hello
You've got license for 250 users anyconnect so unless you are having more users than this number, it shouldn't be a problem. Debugs could help reduce the problem in this case.
Kind regards
Dinesh MoudgilPS Please rate helpful messages.
-
Cisco VPN Client and Windows XP VPN Client IPSec to ASA
I configured ASA for IPSec VPN via Cisco VPN Client and XP VPN client communications. I can connect successfully with Cisco VPN Client, but I get an error when connecting with the XP client. Debugging said "misconfigured groups and transport/tunneling mode" I know, they use different methods of transport and tunneling, and I think that I have configured both. Take a look at the config.
PS a funny thing - when I connect with client VPN in Windows Server 2003, I have no error. The only difference is that client XP is behind an ADSL router and client server is directly connected to the Internet on one of its public IP of interfaces. NAT in the case of XP can cause problems?
Config is:
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2.30
Description remote access
VLAN 30
nameif remote access
security-level 0
IP 85.*. *. 1 255.255.255.0
!
access-list 110 scope ip allow a whole
NAT list extended access permit tcp any host 10.254.17.10 eq ssh
NAT list extended access permit tcp any host 10.254.17.26 eq ssh
access-list extended ip allowed any one sheep
access list nat-ganja extended permit tcp any host 10.254.17.18 eq ssh
sheep-vpn access-list extended permits all ip 192.168.121.0 255.255.255.0
tunnel of splitting allowed access list standard 192.168.121.0 255.255.255.0
flow-export destination inside-Bct 192.168.1.27 9996
IP local pool raccess 192.168.121.60 - 192.168.121.120 mask 255.255.255.0
ARP timeout 14400
global (outside-Baku) 1 interface
global (outside-Ganja) interface 2
NAT (inside-Bct) 0 access-list sheep-vpn
NAT (inside-Bct) 1 access list nat
NAT (inside-Bct) 2-nat-ganja access list
Access-group rdp on interface outside-Ganja
!
Access remote 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 85.*. *. 1 2
Route outside Baku 10.254.17.24 255.255.255.248 10.254.17.10 1
Route outside Baku 192.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.10 1
Outside-Baku route 192.168.39.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.10 1
Route outside-Ganja 192.168.45.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1
Route outside-Ganja 192.168.69.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1
Route outside-Ganja 192.168.184.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1
Route outside Baku 192.168.208.16 255.255.255.240 10.254.17.10 1
Route outside-Ganja 192.168.208.112 255.255.255.240 10.254.17.18 1
dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT
Crypto ipsec transform-set newset aes - esp esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac vpnclienttrans
Crypto ipsec transform-set vpnclienttrans transport mode
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac raccess
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 214748364
Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life security-association 214748364
raccess 1 set transform-set vpnclienttrans crypto dyn1 dynamic-map
vpnclientmap 30 card crypto ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyn1
card crypto interface for remote access vpnclientmap
crypto isakmp identity address
ISAKMP crypto enable vpntest
ISAKMP crypto enable outside-Baku
ISAKMP crypto enable outside-Ganja
crypto ISAKMP enable remote access
ISAKMP crypto enable Interior-Bct
crypto ISAKMP policy 30
preshared authentication
3des encryption
md5 hash
Group 2
life 86400
No encryption isakmp nat-traversal
No vpn-addr-assign aaa
Telnet timeout 5
SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.192 outside Baku
SSH 10.254.17.26 255.255.255.255 outside Baku
SSH 10.254.17.18 255.255.255.255 outside Baku
SSH 10.254.17.10 255.255.255.255 outside Baku
SSH 10.254.17.26 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja
SSH 10.254.17.18 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja
SSH 10.254.17.10 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja
SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.192 Interior-Bct
internal vpn group policy
attributes of vpn group policy
value of DNS-server 192.168.1.3
Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec
Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
Split-tunnel-network-list value split tunnel
BCT.AZ value by default-field
attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
raccess address pool
Group-RADIUS authentication server
Group Policy - by default-vpn
IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
pre-shared-key *.
Hello
For the Cisco VPN client, you would need a tunnel-group name configured on the ASA with a pre-shared key.
Please see configuration below:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml
or
Please see the section of tunnel-group config of the SAA.
There is a tunnel-group called "rtptacvpn" and a pre-shared key associated with it. This group name is used by the VPN Client Group name.
So, you would need a specific tunnel-group name configured with a pre-shared key and use it on the Cisco VPN Client.
Secondly, because you are behind a router ADSL, I'm sure that's configured for NAT. can you please activate NAT - T on your ASA.
"crypto isakmp nat-traversal.
Thirdly, change the transformation of the value
raccess 1 set transform-set vpnclienttrans crypto dyn1 dynamic-map
Let me know the result.
Thank you
Gilbert
-
VPN router Cisco 2611XM VPN client
I have 2611XM router on a Central site with two FastEthernet interfaces? XA; (FastEthernet0/0 and FastEtherne0/1). FE0/0 has private ip address?xa;192.168.1.1/24 and it connects on LAN 192.168.1.0/24. FE0/1A public? XA; address x.x.x.x/30 and his connects to Internet. There on this NAT router? XA; with overload. ? XA; This router is to give customers remote access with Cisco VPN client on? XA; Internet to the LAN and at the same time, the users local access to the Internet. ? XA; I did a config that establish the tunnel between the clients and the router but? XA; I can't ping all devices on the local network. ? XA; The router must also give remote access and LAN in the scenarios from site to site? XA;
I can establish the tunnel between my PC and the router via a dial-up Internet connection. But when the tunnel is established that except my public IP address of the router, I can't ping any public IP address. I can ping all other customers who owns the ip address of the pool for customers.
Addition of the sheep route map should not make you lose the connection to the router.
Are the commands that you will need to put in
access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
sheep allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 101
You need to delete translations of nat or remove commands 'ip nat outside' and 'ip nat inside' temporarily while you are taking the following off the coast
no nat ip inside the source list 7 pool internet overload
and add the command
IP nat inside source map route sheep pool internet overload
Make sure that you reapply the "nat inside ip' and ' ip nat outside of ' orders return of your internal users will not be able to go to the internet.
You can search this config in the link that sent Glenn-
http://www.Cisco.com/warp/public/707/ios_D.html
I pasted the lines that you should look into setting up the example below
! - Except the private network and the VPN Client from the NAT process traffic.
access-list 110 deny ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 110 deny ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 110 permit ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 any
! - Except the private network and the VPN Client from the NAT process traffic.
sheep allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 110
-Except the private network and the VPN Client from the NAT process traffic.
IP nat inside source map route sheep interface FastEthernet0/0 overload
Thank you
Ranjana
-
Cisco VPN Client is blocking incoming connections
Hello
I somethimes (not always) a problem with the Cisco VPN Client.
As soon as the CISCO VPN Client is installed (it must not be running) it blocks inbound connections from the local network.
The problem is that I use Ultra VNC SC to support some of my clients. Another client is supported by Cisco VPN. With UltraVNC SC customer clients try to connect to my PC.
But if I installed the cisco VPN Client, no incoming connections are possible.
How can I change this behavior?
This behavior is not always the same. Last incoming connections of two months were possible, but from one day to another is not possible more.
I recently installed the Client, but it takes no effect :-(
I have NOT activated the firewall Cisco on the VPN Client and the behavior is NOT only if the Client is activated. This is the behavior even if it is NOT active and just installed.
Hi Chris,
Zone alarm is installed on the PC that is defective?
Try to restart the Cisco VPN service and launch the vpn client.
I remember having a similar problem with the Cisco VPN Client. Some conflict between the VPN client and Zone-Alarm, installed on the same PC.
The problem was with VSDATANT variables in the registry key.
Please see the following mail took from another forum:
-
Cisco VPN disconnection problem vpn client
Hello
We have a 8.2 (3) Cisco ASA and several vpn client ipsec that connect to it (5.0.07.0290 - k9 and 5.0.07.0410 - k9).
ExExactly after that 4 hours of these clients vpn connections are deleted even if the client is still sending traffic. I can't find any parameter configuration in order to avoid this connection drop. Someone has an idea how solve it?
I have
I have
AF
Hello
Please paste the output of "sh cry run." We can check the values of life.
also, you can activate him debugs following like half an hour before that the Client waits for the time to unplug.
Deb cry isa 127
Deb cry ips 127.
We can check the reason for the debugging by using the ip address of the client.
I hope this helps.
Kind regards
Anisha
P.S.:Please assign this thread answered if you feel that your query is resolved. Note the useful messages.
-
WebVPN and remote vpn, ssl vpn anyconnect
Hi all
Differences between webvpn and remote vpn, ssl vpn anyconnect
All require a separate license?Thank you
Hello
The difference between the webvpn and SSL VPN Client is the WebVPN to use SSL/TLS and port
send through a java application to support the application, it also only supports TCP for unicast traffic, no ip address
address is assigned to the customer, and the navigation on the web in the tunnel is made with a SSL
Web-mangle that allows us stuff things in theSSL session.
SSL VPN (Anyconnect) Client is a client of complete tunneling using SSL/TCP, which installs an application on the computer and
envelopes vpn traffic in the ssl session and thus also an assigned ip address has the
tunnel's two-way, not one-way. It allows for the support of the application on the
tunnel without having to configure a port forward for each application.
AnyConnect is a client of new generation, which has replaced the old vpn client and can be used as long as the IPSEC vpn ssl.
For anyconnect licenses please see the link below:
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/vpn_client/AnyConnect/ANYC...
Kind regards
Kanwal
Maybe you are looking for
-
Satellite L500-1ek - installation system always starts with 800 x 600
I have the Satellite L500-1ek new laptop with Windows 7. Regardless of the screen resolution still set the system starts with 800 x 600. And not only after reboot but even when I logout my profile and connect again.Learn more: I also use external mon
-
TestStand and Gateway requirements
Hello It is more a question of RG, but there is no RG area to post. I have a Word Document that defines the requirements for a test sequence. Needs are covered by the two (1) LabVIEW VI (2) sequence TestStand. What I want to do is to see what is my c
-
The title says it all.
-
need to upgrade hdd 250 GB how I transferred all of the files and opperatting sys win xp sp3 new disk hard ad not lose any
-
optical drive missing from my computer
ORIGINAL TITLE: I want my disk removable j back! If my removable j drive disappeared, is there a way to get it back? I would like to see the pictures I have on cd and listen to my CD and put music on my mp3 player.