Cisco AP 561 - DHCP problems

Similar Questions

• Cisco 1921 & SG500 VLAN and DHCP problem

  Dear all,

  Thank you in advance for taking the time to read this.

  A little history:

  I want to install a project for an athlete, which is unfortunately on a budget pretty tight with a potentially large quantity of network users (~ 200 without public WIFI). I need to separate the 5 groups of users and to give them all access to internet without see each other. 5 user groups also share the same bandwidth to the internet and VLANs must be controlled bandwidth.

  To do this, I had planned to use Cisco devices built-in functions and buy a 1921 Cisco router as a switch of SG500.

  I have configured the router for 8 subinterfaces is internal NIC with 8 VLAN. I also configured DHCP Pools 8 on the 1921 and set up NAT and firewall.

  What I want to do now is have the SG500 to recognize the VLAN ID, I configured on the router (as well as on the switch using the same VLAN ID numbers), and then assign ports to the VLAN on the switch, and depending on where I plug into the switch, the device receives different IP addresses from DHCP.

  However, I can't get this to work. The router works fine, the 'intact' if left switch gives me an IP address from the DHCP server on the IP address of higher network VLAN (I.e. 168.8.0). but I can not configure the switch ports correctly so that it works. I was also confused, is that dhcp pools that I have configured on the command-line command on the router do not appear in professional CP in the mask of the pool.

  Can someone kindly check the configuration of the router and throw some guidance on how I need to configure the Ports on the SG500? I must say that I have had too many nights and I seem to confuse tagging, untagging, to exclusion and prohibiting the ;.)

  I have the router for you here:

  Thanks again and good night!

  W.

  Hi Wolfgang, for the sx500 configuration can be something like this

  config t

  database of VLAN

  VLAN 2-8

  int item in gi1/1/1

  switchport mode general

  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-8 tag

  switchport General disable filtering of capture

  For any client that connects must be no tagged coelio

  So if you want a client access port then you should do something like 5 unidentified to this port

  config t

  int item in gi1/1/2

  switchport mode access

  switchport access vlan 5

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• SG300 and RVS4000 DHCP problems

  We recently deployed SG300-28 to replace a former 3Com switch.

  The installation program:

  In the SG300 switch router RVS400 and all workstations and server are connected.

  The problem:

  Windows 7 workstations are unable to get IP addresses of the server that is also connected to the switch.

  If, however, plug us into the workstations in the switch 4 ports on the back of the RVS4000 (the router), they get the IPs from the server without problem.

  It works perfectly with the old switch from 3Com for us it was classified in the category small business going.

  A few comments/advice appreciated! Thanks in advance!

  Pavol

  Pavol,

  Please make sure the SG300 switch running latest firmware 1.1.2.0, also new code then please switch factory reset after the upgrade. If you need assistance in upgrading please call Cisco Small Business Support Center @ 1-866-606-1866

  After upgrading please repost how these devices are connected and the configuration of your RVS4000 & SG300 switch series. Using RVS4000 for your DHCP server?

  Also make sure your RVS4000 is running latest firmware as well.

  Jasbryan

• Wireless DHCP problem

  Hello

  I have a problem

  We have cisco ap 500 series, it was light, but we have migrated to standalone, now, the scheme is simple.

  We have a 2811 router and dhcp created on this subject, we also f0/0.30 virtual interface with the ip address of 10.10.30.1

  Switch into a single interface (trunk) goes to f0/0 interface of the router, and a single interface (access) goes to ap

  The access point, we have BVI interface with 10.10.30.10 and default route to 10.10.30.1

  So when connecting to our SSID, it connect but doestn receive DHCP and APIPA address is, please explain why the ap assigns ip clients

  Also ap config.txt here

  Thank you

  Keita,

  Yes, sorry, it was not clear. Make your interface trunk switchport. You follow these steps on the switch:

  (config-if) # switchport trunk dot1q encap switch

  (config-if) # switchport mode trunk switch

  Justin

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• Cisco router 1921 internet problem with a site-to-site vpn connection

  I have TE-data Modem 3com dsl connection in 2 sites. and I have 2 routers cisco 1921 and there is a vpn site-to-site between them and

  the VPN connection works well. and I configured the PAT on one of them to allow users access to the internet but tere is a problem:

  all users can ping a public ip address

  all users can ping any URL

  but there is no navigation of the internet

  and it's configuration

  NOZHA #sh run
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 2425 bytes
  !
  ! Last configuration change at 11:24:08 UTC Thu Sep 20 2012
  !
  version 15.0
  horodateurs service debug datetime msec
  Log service timestamps datetime msec
  no password encryption service
  !
  hostname NOZHA
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  enable secret 5
  !
  No aaa new-model
  !
  !
  !
  !
  No ipv6 cef
  IP source-route
  IP cef
  !
  !
  !
  IP dhcp pool 1
  network 192.168.40.0 255.255.255.0
  router by default - 192.168.40.1
  4.2.2.2 DNS Server 8.8.8.8
  Infinite rental
  !
  !
  IP domain name shady2012
  !
  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
  !
  !
  !
  license udi pid CISCO1921/K9 sn FCZ1432C5KM
  licence start-up module c1900 technology-package securityk9
  !
  !
  !
  redundancy
  !
  !
  !
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  BA aes
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto key shady2012 address 81.10.xxx.yy
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set shady2012 aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
  !
  card crypto 150 s2s - VPN ipsec-isakmp
  the value of 81.10.xxx.yy peer
  PFS group2 Set
  match address s2s-vpn-Oly
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/0
  MTU 1000
  IP address 41.41.xx.yy 255.255.255.252
  NAT outside IP
  activate nat IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  s2s - VPN crypto card
  !
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/1
  192.168.40.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside
  activate nat IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  !
  default IP gateway (hop 41.41.xx.yy) next
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  !
  no ip address of the http server
  no ip http secure server
  !
  The dns server IP
  overload of the IP nat source list mypool GigabitEthernet0/0 interface
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 41.41.xx.yy
  IP route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 (41.41.xx.yy) next hop
  IP route 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 (41.41.xx.yy) next hop
  !
  mypool extended IP access list
  deny ip 192.168.21.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.21.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.40.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.40.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255
  allow an ip
  s2s-vpn-Oly extended IP access list
  ip permit 192.168.40.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.21.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.30.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.40.0 0.0.0.255
  ip licensing 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.21.0 0.0.0.255
  ip permit 192.168.40.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.21.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  control plan
  !
  !
  !
  Line con 0
  line to 0
  line vty 0 4
  password
  opening of session
  !
  Scheduler allocate 20000 1000
  end

  If anyone has the answer please answer ASAP

  When you say can ping any URL, I am assuming that you are pinging of the FULL domain name, IE: it is resolved to an ip address, right?

  If you disable the VPN, can you access the internet?

  You have a proxy server or anything that could block navigation?

  This error message you get on your web browser?

  Also try another web browser, and none works?

• Cisco CallManager and DHCP beyond vswitch

  I have a test lab setup for our managers to call cicso 8.6 running in vmware.  Everythings upward and the work.  However, I can not all phones to pick up my 172.16.1.1 editor/dhcp server IP addresses.  DHCP works very well in the vswitch in vmware, but nothing beyond.  Maybe it's a problem with the configuration on my cisco switch, but I would check here thought incase there is something else I need to do on the vswitch.

  I can ping everything in all directions without problem.  I've got the physical hosts on the cisco switch that can ping the managers of the call and vice versa.  I guess it's a vlan tagging problem, but don't know how to solve this problem.  I do not have a router in the laboratory, only the switch that is configured as the gateway for the managers of the call.

  Call managers - 172.16.1.1 (editor) default gateway is 172.16.1.254
  ... DHCP subnet is 172.16.1.0/24
  .
  VMware vSwitch - no vlan tagging, the vswtich is set to zero (0)
  .
  Cisco 3524 - IP Vlan1 172.16.1.254
  ... The port that connects the switch to host vmware...
  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
  switchport access vlan 172
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport voice vlan 172
  spanning tree portfast
  ... The I have a phone plugged into the port...
  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport voice vlan 172
  .
  .

  Again, I can ping everything in and out of the switch just fine.  I can't get anything on the physical switch to pick up an address 172.16.1.1 dhcp.

  Promisc mode & forging of mac address enabled on your vswitch and portgroup - with out that DHCP does not.

• Satellite C870-1J6 wired LAN DHCP problems

  Hi all

  Here, I have a new laptop C870-1J6, which makes my life miserable. It won't start not reliable PXE, and the network card also does not start in Windows.

  On a cold start the PXE boot Gets an address dhcp fine most of the time, but a warm reboot fails most of the time.
  In windows this NIC also does not start. After five to ten minutes, he finally gets an address from the DHCP server. Rest of the network works fine.

  No points for guessing the manufacturer of the network card, of course, there a realtek :-(
  "RTL8102E/RTL8101E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller.
  PCI ven: 10EC, dev: 8136

  None of the solutions, or can send Toshiba somehow? because I don't think I can do a lot on the PXE problem myself.

  At first, I have to say that I m really wondering why you have problems of LAN under Windows.
  Have you noticed these LAN issues from the first day of use?
  Are you using the original pre-installed OS that you got with your laptop or a facility clean or even company?

  Maybe stupid question, but I assume that LAN is set as first boot device, right?

• Trek PR2000 DHCP problems, maintains a drop connections, perhaps workaround

  Hello!

  A few days ago, I bought the new Netgear Trek PR2000 mobile wireless router. Goal was to have a point of contact for all my devices while traveling and be able to connect to a hotspot or wifi in the hotel.

  Configuration has been fine and I was able to connect to my home network in wireless client mode. My router is a TP-Link TL-WR1043ND running OpenWrt 12.09 Attitude Adjustment, wifi with WPA2-AES, DHCP service.

  The Trek has been able to connect, and the whole system was running. Unfortunately, I realized, that the Trek has kept falling connections every 3-5 minutes with the genius of Netgear annoying pop up and try to re-establish a connection. Sometimes it worked, then the Trek cannot connect at all.

  Since I read that OpenWrt Attitude Adjustment can be problems with some wifi connections, I have improved my WR1043ND barrier breaker. The connection drops continued, including OSX almost every minute. The WR1043ND showed various DHCP-wifi-a failed-to-recognize-errors and in his diary.

  After trying all possible setting changes in the Trek-config (and shortly before returning the Trek), I found something as a workaround. In the Trek-config, I disabled the DHCP Server for the LAN area and assigned static IP addresses to connecting clients. Well at least so far, it seems to work very well. No more connections, no more boring engineering arise not interrupted and try to reconnect, the system seems to work.

  But for now, I'm a little confused as to the reason. In my view, the Trek connects to a hotspot and gets an IP address assigned by DHCP from hotspot. Then the Trek uses NAT to connect the clients attached to the internet. Actually the IP addresses of the DHCP assigned by the Trek to customers connected to the LAN area shouldn't affect hotspot NETWORK settings at all. Normally the IP address and private DNS settings are just for private clients LAN, aren't they? If I'm not completely wrong in my assumption, there could be a bug in the DHCP server on the hike or the way how dynamic the client LAN IPs are handled. From the point where I changed to static IP in the LAN client, there was no error message in the log of the WR1043ND.

  Strange thing... Maybe someone could correct me if my assumptions are wrong? BTW, I use the stock PR2000 Trek firmware (which is something like 1.0.0.9) since there is no other is available.

  Thank you.

  @hksteve I wish to inform you that the fix is now available from our download page.

  Feel free to update your firmware and provide feedback.

  Thank you!

• Windows XP DHCP problem when authentication network enabled

  I have a weird problem with Windows XP. Here's a few of my observations:
  -Computer Lenovo X 61 does not connect to a wireless network with a network (that is, Shared/128 b/WEP) authentication. He can never get an IP address from the DHCP server.
  -J' checked the authentication settings. They work in another computer.
  -If I give it a static IP address (less good family), it connects to the router. However, it is very slow and flaky.
  -It connects to open networks.
  -In addition, if I have a wireless and a wired connection to the computer, the wireless connection gets a quick DHCP server address. If I disconnect the wired connection, the wireless connection works perfectly.
  I tried to reinstall the NIC drivers, apply all updates for Windows and Lenovo SW and looked at the values in the Windows registry. Nothing seems to help.
  Any ideas?
  Computer is a Lenovo X 61 Windows XP Professional

  Hello

  In the past, password WEP engines were rather flaky.

  Try using the HEX string instead of the password.

  Or switch to WPA. WEP does not guarantee these days.

• Using 3500 as a Wireless Extender DHCP problem iPhone X 6

  Hello

  If all goes well, a simple question with a simple answer.

  Background:
  I stayed away from my DSL provider to a cable provider (VirginMedia). My new ISP is delivered with a modem cable (SuperHub 2 ac) and I connected the two devices together to extend my wireless home network. The cable modem, it's that the two routers are physically apart from others - connected through just their Ethernet ports - the technology of power line (Devolo dLAN 1200 +). Both routers have the same SSID broadcast, but on separate channels.

  Question:
  All devices in my house, the tablets of laptops, phones roam between the two areas wi - fi transparently * except * the iPhone 6 (iOS8.1), this works on the cable modem wi - fi, but not on the X 3500 wireless. I also have an iPad Mini 2 (also iOS8.1) which works too - aptly / wrong I have excluded iO8.1 as the issue. Oddly enough, the iPhone 6 connects to the x 3500 but isn't getting an IP address (the cable modem's DHCP server). Even if a static IP address doesn't help.

  Comments:
  If the X 3500 is configured as a DHCP server, the iPhoen connects (and gets an IP address), but then the default gateway is incorrect (gateway IP address of the X 3500 is not the modem cable remote). I can't find anywhere to specify a default gateway configuration.

  Question
  I start thinking, it is a problem with the iPhone 6 (know all other devices work correctly), but I want to just make sure I am the X 3500 configuration correctly. I am particularly interested in it if I use the right to 'Mode' ADSL / Ethernet. I tried 'Bridged Mode Only' (ADSL) and "Automatic DHCP only" (Ethernet), but does not seem to solve the problem of having the iPhone 6.

  any suggestions on how to fix / help would be most welcomed.

  Thank you!

  Thanks a lot for the details... Now I have a config that works also for the iPhone6.

  Basically, I connected the cable on the 3500 x port and the Ethernet port on the cable modem connected to the internet (via the Powerline). I then changed the network on the 3500 of 192.168.0.x x range (this is the range of network addresses used by the cable modem connected to the internet) to 192.168.168.x. Finally I activated the DHCP on the x 3500 which seemed to be the element that was killing the iPhone6.

  The iPhone6 connects now (which he always did), but with DHCP running on the x 3500 on the new range of network addresses of the iPhone 6 also get a valid IP address.

  Looks like that much just to get the iPhone 6 to work... never found a manual way to specify a default on the x 3500 gateway when you run DHCP (appears by default which is her own IP address - with no provision to change).

  Anyway... This works for now... I'll keep an eye on the iPhoen updates 6, just in case where the anomaly is something specific to the iPhone 6, if something changes I will post here.

  I have attached a picture for furture reference. Thanks again for your advice and support.

  

• Linksys WAP200 DHCP problem

  Hi, I have problems with the Linksys WAP200. When you use WPA/WPA2 Enterprise client hangs for about 60 seconds to try and obtain an IP address after a successful authentication. AccessPoints from other suppliers do not show this behavior.

  I did a tcpdump and comapred an accesspoint of another provider in the WAP200 work, and it seems that the WAP200 is reject bids that are sent via unicast DHCP. When the dhcp server sends an offer through broadcast after 65 seconds, it reaches the client and all is well.

  This is clearly buggy since the access point seems to be filtering the DHCP responses, is there an option to solve this problem?

  WPA is a known issue with the WAP54G as well. He breaks the wireless link entirely if you use Repeater/bridge modes. It is possible that Linksys a general isue with WPA in several similar products.

  So that it is resolved I feel Linksys just to be notified in writing. This also provides a written question should be wound.

  Concerning

  Fred

• DHCP problem

  I entered the IP address of my wireless router (the one you enter the internet browser to display the parameters) and be stupid, that I disabled the DHCP. After that, I couldn't even connect to my router or go that meet. A few hours later, I managed to restart (factory reset) the router and now I can enter the address IP DHCP is on. However, again, when you start the computer, it displays the message DHCP - and these hyphens are shown. Then start windows. I wanted to re - configure the TP link router and when I run the Setup from the CD, it says that the DHCP protocol is not enabled. I don't think that the computer is still recognizing the router when connected, assuming that the DHCP is disabled for the tunnel router. I tried a static IP (not sure if I was doing it well), but don't know what to do after that. I changed back to auto, but DHCP appears again as a problem when the computer is started and all trying to install my TP Link. I'm stuck and I have no idea what to do, please explain as simply as possible, because in fact, I went in things I don't understand.

  Thanks in advance

  Hi Adriana,

  DHCP allows your computer to automatically assign an IP address to turn it off, it is not recommended, unless you have your network settings. Please follow the instructions below to ensure that DHCP is enabled:

  1. click on Start and open the control Panel.
  2. click on network and sharing Center icon.
  3 al ' View your active networks section, click on the link to connect to the Local network .
  4. in the Local area connection status window, click the Properties button.
  5. highlight the Internet Version 4 Protocol option and click the Properties button. You may need to do the following for option Protocol Internet Version 6 as well.
  6. make sure obtain an IP address automatically is selected, as well as the DNS server to obtain an address automatically.

  If that did not resolve your problem, contact your router manufacturer or your internet service provider for the correct settings.

  Please keep us updated.

  Kind regards.

• Cisco integrated event handler problem

  Hello Experts,

  I took the following sample EEM

  https://learningnetwork.Cisco.com/blogs/network-Sheriff/2009/06/19/writing-your-first-EEM-applet

  The intention is to send a notification to an email address on a network problem. I modified it bit as illustration. You will see that there are various show commands.

  Can someone show me please how to send show rather commands simply by adding them to the directory called "server_unreachable"?

  TechWiseTV4506 (config) #eve

  (_email_server 172.16.1.44) NT Manager environment<-my post="" cast="">

  TechWiseTV4506 (config) #event Manager environment _email_to [email protected] / * /

  TechWiseTV4506 (config) #event Manager environment _email_from [email protected] / * /

  Event Manager applet email_server_unreachable

  Event track 10 down state

  message from syslog to action 1.0 "Houston we have a problem. Ping failed, inaccessible Server! »

  command action 1.1 cli 'enable '.

  Action 1.2 cli command "del/force flash: server_unreachable.

  action 1.3 cli command "display the clock | Add server_unreachable.

  action 1.4 cli command "show ip arp 172.16.1.55 | Add server_unreachable.

  action 1.5 cli command "show ip route 172.16.1.55 | Add server_unreachable.

  action 1.6 cli command "show interface FastEthernet0/1/1 | Add server_unreachable.

  action 1.7 cli command "flash: server_unreachable more»

  Action 1.8 mail server "$_email_server" to "$_email_to" of "$_email_from" subject "inaccessible server: ICMP-echo has no" body "$_cli_result»

  Action 1.9 msg syslog "Server unavailable alert has been sent to the mail server!

  See you soon

  Carlton

  This cmdlet will actually results by e-mail.  However, in order to get all of the whole output, it uses the file server_unreachable as a buffer from the accumulator.  This file could be deleted as an action 2.0:

  Action 2.0 cli command "remove/force flash: server_unreachable.

  But it is already there in action 1.2, so it is not really necessary.

  What will happen, this is the applet will be more the file to collect all of the production.  This aggregate output is stored in the variable of _cli_result $.  The result is that the body of your email will contain the result of the consolidated order.

• VPN between Cisco and Check Point problem

  Guys,

  I have problems to establish a vpn site-to-site between a Cisco 3660 e router tunnel a firewall checkpoint NG AI R55.

  In the SiteA is an environment with a Cisco 3660 router using the following configurations:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  life 86400

  !

  ISAKMP crypto key [removed] address 172.17.10.111

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac serasa

  !

  Serasa 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined by peer 172.17.10.111

  Set transform-set serasa

  match address 101

  !

  interface Serial5/4

  bandwidth 64

  IP 192.168.163.6 255.255.255.252

  no ip unreachable

  No cdp enable

  card crypto serasa

  !

  IP route 10.12.0.155 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

  IP route 172.17.10.111 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

  IP route 172.17.10.155 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

  !

  access-list 101 permit tcp 172.248.7.200 host 10.12.0.0 0.0.255.255 eq 3315

  In the SiteB, we have an environment highly available Nokia using VRRP.

  The IP address configured as a cluster in the Control Point is 172.17.10.111.

  We have already confirmed all the configurations of the phase 1 and 2 and is OK, but the VPN is not established.

  The following messages appear in the router and the firewall:

  ROUTER

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): check IPSec 1 proposal

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: turn 1 ESP_DES

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: attributes of transformation:

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: program is 1

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: life of HIS (basic) 3600

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: type of life in kilobytes

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: service life of SA (IPV) 0x0 0 x 46 0 50 x 0 x 0

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: authenticator is HMAC-MD5

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): atts are acceptable.

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (validate_proposal_request): part #1 of the proposal

  (Eng. msg key.) Local INCOMING = 192.168.163.6, distance = 172.17.10.111,.

  local_proxy = 172.248.7.200/255.255.255.255/0/0 (type = 1),

  remote_proxy = 10.12.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0 (type = 4),

  Protocol = ESP, transform = esp - esp-md5-hmac.

  lifedur = 0 and 0kb in

  SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0 x 2

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (kei_proxy): head = serasa, card-> ivrf =, kei-> ivrf =

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (validate_transform_proposal): proxy unsupported identities

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): IPSec policy invalidated proposal

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): politics of ITS phase 2 is not acceptable! (local 192.168.163.6 remote 172.17.10.111)

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: node set 2114856837 to QM_IDLE

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): lot of 200.245.207.111 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): purge the node 2114856837

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): unknown entry for node-528822595: State = IKE_QM_I_QM1, large = 0x00000001, minor = 0x0000000C

  June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: % CRYPTO-6-IKMP_MODE_FAILURE: fast processing mode failed with the peer to 172.17.10.111

  FIREWALL

  IKE: Main Mode has received Notification of peers: first Contact

  IKE: Completion of Main Mode.

  IKE: Quick Mode has received Notification of the counterpart: no proposal chosen

  IKE: Quick Mode has received Notification of the counterpart: no proposal chosen

  IKE: Exchanging information received remove peer IKE - SA:

  Anyone have idea who might be the problem?

  Thank you very much for the help.

  Fabiano Mendonca.

  Cool. pls mark as resolved if that might help others... the rate of responses if deemed useful...

  REDA

• Cisco RV220W IPSec VPN problem Local configuration for any config mode

  Dear all,

  I need help, I am currently evaluating RV220W for VPN usage but I'm stuck with the config somehow, it seems that there is a problem with the Mode-Config?

  What needs to be changed or where is my fault?

  I have installed IPSec according to the RV220W Administrator's Guide. Client's Mac with Mac Cisco IPSec VPN, I also tried NCP Secure Client.

  I have 3 other sites where the config on my Mac works fine, but the Cisco VPN router is not.

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: remote for found identifier "remote.com" configuration

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: application received for the negotiation of the new phase 1: x.x.x.x [500]<=>2.206.0.67 [53056]

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: early aggressive mode.

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: RFC 3947

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsra-isakmp-xauth-06.txt

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: CISCO - UNITY

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: DPD

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: for 2.206.0.67 [53056], version selected NAT - T: RFC 39472013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: floating ports NAT - t with peer 2.206.0.67 [52149]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload is x.x.x.x [4500]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for 2.206.0.67 [52149]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: NAT detected: Peer is behind a NAT device

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: request sending Xauth for 2.206.0.67 [52149]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association established for x.x.x.x [4500] - 2.206.0.67 [52149] with spi: 1369a43b6dda8a7d:fd874108e09e207e

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: type of the attribute "ISAKMP_CFG_REPLY" from 2.206.0.67 [52149]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: connection for the user "Testuser".

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: type of the attribute "ISAKMP_CFG_REQUEST" from 2.206.0.67 [52149]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] WARNING: ignored attribute 5

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28678

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28683

  2013-03-07 01:56:07: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: purged-with proto_id = ISAKMP and spi = 1369a43b6dda8a7d:fd874108e09e207e ISAKMP Security Association.

  2013-03-07 01:56:08: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association deleted for x.x.x.x [4500] - 2.206.0.67 [52149] with spi: 1369a43b6dda8a7d:fd874108e09e207e

  Hi Mike, the built-in client for MAC does not work with the RV220W. The reason is, the MAC IPSec client is the same as the Cisco VPN 5.x client.

  The reason that this is important is that the 5.x client work that on certain small business products include the SRP500 and SA500 series.

  I would recommend that you search by using a client VPN as Greenbow or IPSecuritas.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful