Cisco Catalyst 4503->; Cisco 3560 L3->; Cisco 2960 L2->; Cisco SMB switch
Hi Experts,
I am trying to add a Cisco SMB SF300 - 24 Switch to an infrastructure that has only the Cisco Catalyst switches
The base layer is Cisco Cataylst 4503. Distribution is Cisco Catalyst 3560 and Cisco 2960 switches access layer.
There are about 30 VLAN present in the infrastructure that is announced to all switches using VTP. Inter VLAN routing takes place at basic switches
by creating the Interface VLAN for each VLAN of L2.
1. the new 150 VLAN must be created on the new Cisco SMB switch. If I create a corresponding interface 150 VLAN on core switches, it will forward the other VLANs traffic just as he is currently working for Cisco 2960 Catayst switches?
2. While they inspected, I could see that the DERIVATIVE is not supported on the Cisco SMB switches and I would need to go GVRP if I need to make advertising information to other switches VLAN. But since GVRP is only supported on CatOS and there is no inter operability between GVRP and DERIVED, I would need to manually create the VLAN on the new switch. Is this correct?
Help, please!
Thank you very much
ANUP
Good afternoon Anup Sasikumar
Please use our forum
My name is Johnnatan I am part of the community of support to small businesses, I saw your post and I understand that you want to configure VTP and GVRP.
I'm afraid you will have to configure it manually each Vlan in each device CatOS GVRP, in order to keep their databases vlan in sync. As you say, VTP is support it not in CatOS
You can try to connect the two protocols, but I encourage you do not follow this procedure.
On your question about intervlan routing, if you create a corresponding interface 150 VLANS on switches to base it is routed, if your configuration is correct (port access, ports of junction, intervlan etc..)
I hope that you will find this answer useful, if it was satisfactory to you, please indicate the question as answer.
Please evaluate the useful messages.
Greetings,
Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
Support of Cisco network engineer
Tags: Cisco Support
Similar Questions
-
HSRP support on the cisco SMB switches
Hello!
Just a question.
One of the Cisco Small Business L3 switches support the failover as HSRP, VRRP, and GLBP entry protocols?
Thanks in advance
Hi Dejan,
Oops, I overlooked the fact that you need L3 switches.
In this case, indeed the Catalyst 3560 would be the best choice.
Thank you for your trust to Cisco!
Best regards
Nico glacier
Senior Network Engineer - CCNA
PS: Could mark you it as answered? Thank you
-
A SG300 Cisco SMB Switch will support DHCP Option 156?
Hi all
Is it possible to configure the 156 on a Sx300 Cisco DHCP scope option? Its for Shoretel IPT... I noticed that the option is not available through the user interface. But I tried the other day on a switch with the latest firmware via the CLI and it almost worked but I couldn't switch to accept the exact string that I needed... For example below (the Cisco classic):
the option ascii 156 'ftpservers = 172.16.250.21, country = 7, language = 4, layer2tagging = 1, vlanid = 100 '.
Guidance gratefully received...
Thanks in advance
Matt
Hi Matthew, the options supported on the DHCP server are as follows:
1,3,4,6, 12, 15, 44, 46, 50, 51, 53. 54, 55, 56, 58, 59 and 61.
-Tom
Please mark replied messages useful -
Hi Expert,
How to distinguish the physical interface and logic (subinterface) interface to the Cisco router/Switch? Can you please clarify a formal way for this so have?
A physical interface is numbered with the same name of the interface when printing on the physical port. For example "GigabitEthernet 0/1" corresponds to port 1 of the 0 module (or the base unit).
A logical interface can be a subinterface on a routed port and will have a point ("". "") preceding the number sous-interface (ex. GigabitEthernet 0/1.1). It can also be a loop or a virtual interface (on a router this could also include interfaces like the tunnel and virtual tunnel or VTI types). A switch may also have a VLAN logical interfaces (e.g. interface vlan 1) which are used as layer 3 virtual interfaces of type.
-
Connect a Cisco L3 switch behind a 871 using easyvpn
Hello
It is our habit to use easyvpn on 871 routers to connect our remote to our ASA 5500 VPN concentrators.
It works well, we define them VLAN on the 871 and connect Cisco L2 switches behind the VPN routers.
Problem is that now we have to connect the Cisco L3 switch behind the VPN routers and if we face problems of routing...
No way to make works for all the VLAN defined on the switch of L3!
I guess we have to use a specific configuration (IRB?).
Or do we have to use IPSEC-L2L instead of the easyvpn?
Thanks for your help.
Kind regards
Patrick Lee
Patrick,
It will certainly benefit you started.
You can google some more for that.
Someone posted this on the forums, but I think you might want to ask them
https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-3066;JSESSIONID=444194CDE250004E116705FF0ADAD955. Node0
I hope this helps.
Marcin
Edit: many thing depend on whether you use NEM and if you plan to use. If you in any qustions stumple - post here.
-
I'm looking to deploy a series 5100 Cisco NEXUS switch at 10 Gbps.
I know that the Nexus is supposed to work with the converged network adapter (for 10 Gbps FCoE, etc.), but can it operate without an ANC?
I want to put some passthrough 10 Gbps modules in my Dell m1000 chassis and the cables directly to the Nexus switch.
I know that the Nexus is perhaps overstated for this solution, but it is a step in the UCS solution for us.
Thoughts?
James
Hi, you don't need special drivers for "low latency" 10 Gbit ethernet on a 5 k.
for example, to switch non-nexus 5 k
PING 10.10.10.1 (10.10.10.1) 56 (84) bytes of data.
64 bytes of 10.10.10.1: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 255 time = 0,530 ms
64 bytes of 10.10.10.1: icmp_seq = 2 ttl = 255 time = 0.618 ms
and a nexus 5000 with a qlogic 8152
PING 172.16.78.3 (172.16.78.3) 56 (84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.16.78.3: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 128 time = 0.150 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.78.3: icmp_seq = 2 ttl = 128 time = 0,134 ms
Oracle rac cluster will fly!
-
MS NLB Multicast configuration on Cisco Bladecenter switches mode
We seek to MS NLB Multicast configuration on Cisco Bladecenter switches mode. We are adding static ARP and CAM entries for each port on the switches kernel that
the Bladecenters are connected to, or just the port of the virtual machine arrives at
push traffic at this time here? If we add it to a single port,
How vmotion will work... because it seems that we have to manually
transfer the arp from one port to the other entry.
We add the static ARP entry to the entire Cisco switch. If you can VMotion VMs NLB to another host that is physically connected to another switch, then this switch have thus added ARP entry. We have not tested the configuration only on the specified ports. But if you do, make sure that you include all the ports connected to the physical switch (if for DS you have four natachasery configured in a vSwitch...).
Here's a guide to how we have configured it several times in our society.
-
SSH and Telnet access for catalyst 4503 list
I was wondering the structure of command to apply an access list to ssh and telnet on a catalyst 4503. I keep a list of access for indoors and outdoors. Can afford two different IPs from the outside? Thank you
You will need create an access list indicating the networks/hosts that you want to allow.
-Example
access-list 10 permit 10.10.1.10
access-list 10 permit 10.10.2.10
access-list 10 permit 127.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 10 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
So you want to put this list of access on the VTY interfaces.
-Example
line vty 0 4
access-class 10
entry ssh transport * if you only want to SSH *.
line vty 5 15
access-class 10
entry ssh transport * Ditto *.
Now you can do all this with * line vty 0 15 * but, it gives you a better idea of what is happening. It is a simplistic configuration. Remember that it is advisable not to allow ssh. If you want to allow at the same time, let him * transport input ssh * out of the configuration.
I hope that gives you an idea of the structure. If this is not the case, let me know.
-
LAPAC1750PRO &; Cisco 2960-S - LACP issues Switch
Hello community,
I currently have a layer 2 Cisco 2960-S switch. It has 48 port Gigabit Ethernet ports and 4 SFP ports. I have Setup 3 VLAN on the switch VLAN 10, 11, 255. VLAN 10 is for my home equipment, VLAN 11 for my Audio/video/server equipment and VLAN255 is my network of comments. It's all behind a normal router from D-Link 4 port every day. All correctly connected working processes.
I have the LAPAC1750PRO access point, I went ahead and ran 2 Cat6 cables so I could take advantage of the link aggregation 802.3d of the Access Point. I configured the passage from what I can tell properly. The problem is that when I turn on the two links AP causes beating port and stop passing traffic. If I disable the second link (leaving the active primary link) everything is stable. Speed is decent on my laptop, and from my iPad, it's fantastic.
Does anyone have experience using the Protocol LACP (link Aggreagtion 802.3d) with this Access Point? I really want to use this so I can get 2 Gbps throughput of this device to my other devices.
I'll be happy to post my Cisco Configuration so if someone is paid enough in that as well.
Thank you
Jason
Senior Network Engineer
OK - I thought about it. He was not at all a problem with the switch or my setup. This is the problem...
Here's the question – and how I fixed it.
1 cisco switch - Configuration:
!
GigabitEthernet1/0/1 interface
switchport access vlan 10
switchport mode access
spanning tree portfast
channel-group mode 1 on!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
switchport access vlan 10
switchport mode access
spanning tree portfast
channel-group mode 1 onThat's right - this force LACP on the unit and do not have to worry about negotiating/connections protocols.
2. access point - if it is already configured - factory reset the unit. LACP must be enabled during active keybord with DHCP boot. After that you can configure it as you want.
What I had to do so was by default the access point and let it be starting with LACP rebuild - I wonder if this is due to something in the firmware that, once the NIC is configured, they become hardcoded and do not change to different settings?
Whatever it is - this problem is solved.
-
M8024 K-switch Cisco WS - 2960 S-24TD-L switch interconnection
Hello
I have 4 ports SFP + Module switch M8024-K. I want to establish connectivity 10Gig between M8024-k and Cisco WS-C2960S-24TD-L switch. I'm not able to find the exact Dell transmitter/receiver part number required for 4-port SFP + Module and cord Patch LC - LC-OFC required dell. I have no problem with Cisco parts.
Kindly suggest exact reference numbers.
Jean Marc
This transceiver is listed on the list of compatibility of the server but not the switch. It can work in the switch, but I can't confirm that it will be because he is not on the compatibility list.
-
Did somebody switches Cisco MDS to listen without having to continually restart the cimserver? If so what software version are you running?
The new software is expected to have supported this - version 1.2.0.
Please let me know if he is doing if we can solve this.
Mike -
Could someone tell me please to a small businesses of Cisco switch that would be capable of powering of five WAP321?
I do not know the power on these access points profile but have noticed that the PoE injectors pump 16.8 watts MAX. I find anywhere what the power profile is on WAP321 APs but ~ 17 WATTS seems to be quite high.
In fact, I was interested in the SF100D - 16 p which has a budget of power of 64W on 8 ports... the price range is within my budget.
If someone could tell my, if the SF100D - 16 p can power 5-6 WAP321 enough? Thank you.
Hello Rob, the answer is Yes, the SG100D - 16 p will manage enough 5 AP.
-
How to configure the VLAN for Cisco SG500 - switch 28
Hello
First of all, it's my first post here, I hope that someone can help me and please be patient because I am very little known.
OK, so let me explain to you the scénarion I face and I hope someone can help me.
We have a Cisco SG500 - 28 port gigabit switch in our workplace.
Our goal is to create 3 VLANs and separate networks between the various departments.
Vlan1 (which is the default VLAN in the switch)-will be used for the COMPUTER service and management.
VLAN100 - will be used for business.
VLAN200 - will be used for clients who need to connect to internet via WiFi.
I created VLAN100 and VLAN200, and VLAN1 is there by default.
I want to use port 13 for VLAN200 and to connect the-Wifi access point there.
The uplink is in port 25.
I would be happy if you could explain things first to a more general, abstract level, and then we can look at the specific scenario that we have.
SG500 Cisco - 28 Gets a Sophos UTM 9 router internet.
I need to take care of the inter - VLAN routing so, subnet and DHCP
Thanks in advance,
Sincere greetings,
D
Hi Desmond, looking at this DHCP pool it looks correct.
For the second part, you waant VLAN 200 only work on VLAN 200, that's fine. So if you have an access point, and everything on the VLAN 200 connects to the access point, you can make an access to this list. The access list is entered only, which means the inbound interface.
So if you have a gateway connecting to #1 port. You'll need to build the access list and apply it to port number 1. That's assuming you make a list of access 'decline' subnet source IP of VLAN 200 destined for the other subnet, that you do not want access.
The image on another post to fill out your reference numbers, then for the ACL link, it should be placed on the interface VLAN 200 first comes to the switch (IE, the port the access point connects, make sure that you choose to bind by port instead of per VLAN)
-Tom
Please mark replied messages useful
http://blogs.Cisco.com/smallbusiness/ -
IPsec tunnel on cisco 3750 Switch
Guys... I just wanted to know, is - it possible to configure/close the tunnel vpn ipsec on cisco switch 3750.
Thanks in advance.
NO u cant, you can on CAT 6500 with VPN module!
-
We have four switches Cisco SG300 - 28 p and a Linksys SRW2024 switch in a closet. I've been here for awhile and I'm finally getting the time to straighten out the mess of wires in this cabinet. I know that you have to connect the switches and at that time, they use one to 28 ports. Can I use the gigabit ports instead? Thanks for any help.
No worries, glad it helped... Yes, the numbering of the latest ports bit is a bit strange
Maybe you are looking for
-
Difficulties to show full screen Freecell
I recently had to reinstall Windows XP Media more and now I can't get Freecell to fill the full screen. It shows that on the fear that half of the screen and the button bigger makes half smaller. I would like suggestions.
-
Adwere on computer - bestonlinebounty
I played one game offline when the thing pops up. I have had no web browsers open at the time. When she appeared it forced the game to reduce to a minimum. This is the first time I saw it. I used the taskbar to close, making sure not not to click
-
My husband Outlook.com account has been blocked. How can he go?
original title: blocked hotmail account HelloMU husband account is blocked. When he enters the user name and password it says Your account has been locked Why are you seeing this? Someone may have used your account to send a lot of unwanted messages
-
Why asked am me a network password when I didn't put a password?
I have recently upgraded to Windows 7 and a dialog box is constantly popping up asking for a password for Nestwork sign my computer. I didn't put a password that I am the only person using this computer. I tried all my existing passwords and he comes
-
You have a problem with the VAC, it says: "cannot reach the Adobe servers. Check your firewall settings, and then try again in a few minutes". Well I did, but it dosent works, need help, please!