CIsco ISE - HP Openview monitoring.

Similar Questions

• Cisco ISE 1.1.1 with Windows posturing

  Hello

  We tired for configured windows posturing here's the scenario

  We saw five ise boxes 3315 with version 1.1.1 off them 2 is admin, 2 is PS and 1 MNT

  and we have local Symantec and WSUS Server.

  We make posturing for Windows where I have a few questions

  (1) is there an integration here of the local WSUS server with Cisco ISE where Cisco ISE can automatically take all the mandatory WSUS update according to the crititcality of the WSUS server.

  (2) what is advised to set up the strategy of the Posture of the posture of windows in Cisco ISE and if manually configure windows political posture using specific KB and if there is an update available on Microsoft will we be able to configure the policy for the new update.

  (3) we have configured authentication dot1x in cisco ise and asked as well as on switch port where once the user must be connected to dot1x port of the switch it invites username and password dot1x and therefore, authorization policy, it gives vlan appropriate dynamics.

  But what are the ways where we can restrict the machine which is rather than the assets of the company and even if the user's user name and password in short any employee aware how we can restrict the user making the machine rather than the assets of the company?

  (4) can configure US policy posture for antivirus which will keep us in normal mode and at the same time, we can put posturing for windows which monioring mode which only monitor policy posture and reflected in the monitoring, log in which does not restrict the network for windows posturing

  That will be great if any one can please help me to get the issues

  Thank you

  Pranav

  What follows is under the POLICY-OF ELEMENTS of STRATEGY-POSTURE-> REQUIREMENTS > >

  

  What follows is located under

  POLICY OF-> ELEMENTS OF STRATEGY-> POSTURE->

  REPAIR-> WINDOWS SERVER UPDATE SERVICES REMEDIATION ACTIONS

  

  What follows is part POLICY-> POSTURE

  

  These settings work ALMOST flawlessly for me by forcing her we approved on our WSUS server for our group of workstations updated (all of our laptops are members of the) which meet the criteria of severity EXPRESS (critical and Important). Now, what I've discovered in the last few days is that... MS seems a bit random in their identification of what severity level they assign to their updates. For example... I think that a service pack of the operating system would be considered IMPORTANT if not CRITICAL... however... Look at this from the identification of the server WSUS from Windows 7 Service Pack 1:

  

  Thus, those who updates you deleted, I'd go throgh your WSUS server to identify how they are identified by gravity, then according to your needs set the parameters of the ISE accordingly to ensure that you get updates you plan.

  Hope this helps everyone out there who has similar problems.

  Thank you

  Dirk

• Cisco ISE synchronization and NTP server

  I am currently implementing Cisco ISE to our customer.

  But having a little problem Cisco ISE cannot synchronize with NTP server.

  Keep in mind, NTP servers in AD.

  Currently, Cisco ISE synchronize just at the local level.

  Cisco ISE implemented distributed mode, when there are two Cisco ISE installed on VMware (Administration & monitoring primary & secondary node), and another is the device (political Service node).

  As a result of it might not sync server NTP and the ISE of Cisco, Cisco ISE often OUT-OF-SYN.

  Is there a solution for this problem?

  Gandhi,

  This is a known issue, I have crossed upwards and have not read that you use AD as your NTP server, there have been problems with integration of the ISE and ACS with AD as their ntp source, please use another device like sources ntp, for example a router.

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Cisco ISE and external syslog server

  Hi Security Experts,

  We start with deployment cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) in our network. We have allocated 250 GB of space for the node (Admin + monitor) ISE.

  I want to know if we can send tracking of nodes of external syslog server logs after a defined time interval.

  For example, newspapers that are more than 10 days are for external syslog server. So basically our node monitoring will have the marbles which are the Max 9 days. Is this possible? Could you tell me some doc that explains the configuration of the same thing?

  Thank you

  Boudou

  No this is not possible via syslog. What you need is database purge, so that the monitoring database is purged after a determined time interval. Here's a guide that will help shed some light on this:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1/user_guide/ise_mnt.html#wp1054328

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Cisco ise license command

  I have a question

  1. is it possible to install the Cisco ISE software on the server machine to physical HP (without solution VMware or without the use of SNS-3415-k9 cisco device)?

  2. for 2500 users online, I'll order L-ISE-BSE-2550, L-ISE-PLS-S-2500 and L-ISE-APX-S-2500 of basis, more and apex licenses. My question is HA (primary and secondary) application I need 2 licenses for each? (2 * L - ISE - BSE - 2550, 2 * L - ISE - PLS - S - 2500 and 2 * L - ISE - APX - S - 2500)

  or just a license for each is enough?

  3. If I implement Cisco ISE and HA on VMware environment, can I 2 L-ISE-VM-K9 licenses for each VM machines? and also I need 2 licenses for each basic, plus, and at the apex?

  4. What is smart net Cisco and Cisco SASU? need to buy these for support and ticketing system?

  5. What is license for cisco anyconnect (L-AC-APX-1 year-G)?

  thnx in adv.

  You can install ISE on a HP ONLY Server if you are using software virtualization (VMware or KVM).

  The Guide of Installation of ISE sets out three options:

  1 hardware appliance from cisco SNS

  2. virtual machine VMware

  3 Linux KVM.

  The AnyConnect license is required to qualify with the features of the Apex. It is not installed on the ISE server, however.

• Cisco ISE with GANYMEDE + and RADIUS both?

  Hello

  I'm wired opening of authentication on a network using Cisco ISE. I studied the conditions for this. I know that I need to enable the RADIUS on the Cisco switches on the network. The switches in the network are already programmed to GANYMEDE +. Anyone know if they can both operate on the same network at the same time?

  Bob

  I suppose that Ganymede is configured (with ACS 4.x or 5.x) for the peripheral administration via telnet/ssh, and now you need the RADIUS (radius) to authenticate 802. 1 x. Yes they can both work on the same network at the same time.

  ~ BR
  Jatin kone

  * Does the rate of useful messages *.

• Cisco ISE 1.1.2.145 Admin authentication via the LDAP protocol

  I have configured the LDAP protocol and able to retrieve our LDAP directory structure. Now, I'm trying to point authentication "Admin Access" Source 'External identity', which is the new LDAP IS I created. But I couldn't find an option to authenticate locally if for some reason the LDAP configuration does not work. I learned that the ISE can automatically return to local auth as external sources Idenitity are inaccessible. How can I test the LDAP authentication with breaking them our Admin Access? I thought to open two parallel sessions, one with Super Admin account Local and one with the domain account. But I noticed that ISE communication is smart enough for the closing session/connection no matter what other sessions in different browsers so, basically, I can't open two parallel sessions the same machine to test. Suggestions? or am I missing something here?

  Thanks in advance.

  Hi Srinivas,

  Even if you configure LDAP as a source of external identity of admin access, you can always internal relief without having locked. According to the ISE user guide:

  During the operation, Cisco ISE is designed to "fall back" and try to perform the internal identity database authentication, if the communication with the external identity store has not been established, or if it fails. In addition, whenever an administrator for which you have configured external authentication launches a browser and initiates a logon session, the administrator must still the option authentication of demand through the local Cisco ISE database by choosing 'Internal' to the Selector drop-down storage of identity in the Connect dialog box.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1/user_guide/ise_man_identities.html#wp1351543

  Please see the attached screenshot by my lab ISE:

  

  I configured the admin authentication against AD, but I still see both 'Internal' and 'AD' at the time of the connection.

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you

  Aastha

• Cisco ISE

  Hi all

  I intend to implement cisco ISE in my network. I have 1000 endpoints and some mobile devices. I plan to use approach distributed and all licenses possible.

  It is: should I buy licenses for all nodes. For example 1000 for the head node, 1000 for high school, 1000 for surveillance and so forth?

  Or should I buy license only 1000 (I mean 1000 base + 1000 advances + 100 mobile) ones and apply them to all nodes?

  Concerning

  Max

  Hi Max.

  ISE is authorized by the deployment. So if you have a distributed with us deployment will tell ISE 10 nodes or servers you will always only the node main Administrator license.

  Now, if you plan to have two deployments (say a deployment for the EMEA region and the other for APAC) then you would need licenses for both deployments (you allow the node primary admin in each deployment).

  I hope this makes sense :)

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Cisco ISE and Meraki RADIUS

  I am very new to Cisco ISE and Meraki.  I try to get the Radius configuration for wireless authentication.  When I do a test of the Meraki to ISE, it passes.

  When I try to connect from my laptop, I look at the logs of the Radius and it passes; However, it does not connect me to good policy.  I keep hitting the default policy.  I have my Meraki police above the default policy in the strategy defined in article.  I have attached what looks like my strategy game.

  Devices does not really matter. Here is what I see when I create a device group (where you add the access point to this group), and then create the condition:

  networkdevicegroups.PNG

  

  And here is where I create the condition of strategy game and you should be able to select the Meraki access points:

  devicecondition.PNG

  

  This will give you the condition similar to what I posted above. This is perhaps why you aren't hit that is not matching the condition for this game.

• Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) - seeds SGA device?

  Hello

  We have a LAB with Cisco ISE, certificates and list DACL. Everything works fine with the 1.1.1 version but now we want to use the functionality of CMS - SGT instead of the ACL and we found that we need seed for this device and the only device that takes in charge the Nexus 7000 is. Is this true? What is the only way that we can use LMS - SGT? Are there plans that any other device will be used to seed device?

  BR, Marko

  The device of seed set as first device that communicates with the ISE. It must be a link.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/solutions/enterprise/security/TrustSec_2.0/trustsec_2.0_dig.PDF

  In addition the Nexus needs a license of Advanced Services installed in order to support the Trustsec.

  I can't comment on any future plans.

• Group of endpoint Cisco ISE 1.4 hotspot

  Patch 1.4 Cisco ISE 6

  Cisco WLC 8.0.121

  Setup

  the WLC has a named Hotspot SSID. It uses mac auth with radius of the NAC to redirect to the Hotspot portal of reviews on the ISE.

  drops flexconnect users in vlan 401 (with preAuthAcl), after the PSU, it is initially a COA to move users to VLANs 413 with permitInternetAcl

  Description of the problem:

  users connect to the SSID of the access point and get an IP address valid in vlan 401

  redirected to the page of the hotspot on the ISE with a PSU and the PIN code request.

  are they disconnect from the network and reconnect, the ISE sends a certificate of authenticity to move to 413 without the Hotspot portal.

  what I've noticed, is that as soon as users get the redirect of the original Web page, they are moved to the endpoint group defined in the hotspot portal.

  What I've read about this behavior makes me understand that it is a default behavior, but if that's the case then I'm not sure on how I can make my font to check if the PSU has been accepted.

  Thank you

  Maarten

  Portal.PNG

  

  Policy.PNG

  

  Profile.PNG

  

  Cisco WLC 8.2.100

  Patch 1.4 ISE 6

  Similar Hotspot ISE installation, of similar rules except change VLAN. I have observed the same behavior.

  This configuration was working on patch 5.

  Update:

  I found a solution based on the following bug. Use the following attribute in the authorization rule. The success page remains but no Instant Internet access is available using this workaround solution.

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCux22558/?referring_site=bugquic...

  ' Workaround:
  "Use the LEAST 24 endpoints: LastAUPAcceptanceHours for example (means PUA agreed less than 24 hours ago).

• Cisco ISE comments Sponsor Isssue Portal

  Hi all

  We have insatalled 5 boxes of ise 3315 IOS 1.0.4 in our network where in two of them are admin node, two services strategy and has a node mnt. We using sponsor portal for guest user wirless comments where we integrated WLC 5508 with ise and using weblogin for guest users.

  We have created open ssid wlc and external aid redirected url to ise for the login page of comments.

  But when we create a guest in the sponsor for guest user connection, user that we faced after publication

  (1) when guest user gets connected to WiFi and connect to the portal of comments with credentials after putting the credentials then his new redirect to the same login page

  wihout invites successful connection.

  Can us guest login successful after comments connect to the portal of reviews or redirect any other link as google.com for guest user will be done the knowledge he is able to access the internet now

  (2) we have appointed time profile 8hours first user login guest. When the guest user gets connected while putting in credentials on the portal of comments.

  But we are facing problem after about 20 mins enhanced disconnects Internet and comments again Gets the login page of the portal of the guest and if we put the same credentials, then his work but after about 20 min interval disconnected Internet user.

  Can someone help me resolved on observation about covers them cisco ise comments sponsor Portal

  Thank you & best regards

  Pranav Gade

  Pranav your answers are online,

  (1) when guest user gets connected to WiFi and connect to the portal of comments with credentials after putting the credentials then his new redirect to the same login page

  wihout invites successful connection. When you use CWA (Central web authentication) there is no way we can redirect users by using the redirect url because it will always redirect users for each time they start a web request. There is no other cost functionality that will remove this condition because they have already been authenticated.  Here is a guide that explains the user experience when using web Central auth -

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1.1/user_guide/ise_guest_pol.html#wp1296954

  Can us guest login successful after login guest Portal comments or redirect any other link as google.com for guest user will be acquainted with it is able to access the internet now This is not possible, you can change the verbage and force the AUP to be displayed to users informing them that they can start their web request after hitting the button I accept.

  Here's to justify it experience, once users go through the process of reviews-

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps11640/products_configuration_example09186a0080ba6514.shtml#final

  (2) we have appointed time profile 8hours first user login guest. When the guest user gets connected while putting in credentials on the portal of comments.

  But we are facing problem after about 20 mins enhanced disconnects Internet and comments again Gets the login page of the portal of the guest and if we put the same credentials, then his work but after about 20 min interval disconnected Internet user. Check advance timer on your SSID you can be hitting the session on the WLC timeout. Please disable this option and let the functionality of COA ISE at expiration of the user on the controller sessions of.

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Cisco ISE 1.4 comments account Backup

  I currently deploy portal free registry for comments, I now of questions you want to certify, I just want to know to anyone facing the same problem as me.

  (1) except REST API any way to export the guest account

  (2) backup of the Appendix will include the guest account or not

  (3) what deployment node 2, guest account will sync on both nodes?

  Sorry for the bad English.

  Kind regards

  Alan

  1.] I don't think - I can see a well on the same feature request

  CSCty82007    ENH: Export invited accounts set up in ISE

  2.] Yes - backup should have all guest accounts.

  [3.] the Cisco ISE guest services use distributed the Cisco ISE management system to allow several Cisco ISE nodes to work in a deployment. Configurations performed on the head node is replicated to the secondary nodes.

  ~ Jousset

• Press release cisco ISE 2.0

  Can someone please recommend a good book on ISE 2.0... again 2.0

  IMHO there is no good book on ISE 2.0 because there is no book of ISE 2.0 at all.

  IM aware of only three books on ISE:

  • CiscoPress: Unified Cisco ISE BYOD and blocked access
  • CiscoPress: CCNP security SISAS 300-208 official Cert Guide
  • Syngress: Practical deployment of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE): concrete examples of deployments AAA

  I did the first and also know each other. They n 't ISE 2.0 coverage. And looking at the table of contents of the third, it looks no better.

  Not a book at all, but the best documentation for ISE is ISE product page design guides: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/security/identity-services-engine/products-implementation-design-guides-list.html

• Cisco ISE 1.3 disable "Identity Resolve" step?

  Currently, I am working for a client with a Cisco ISE 1.3 deployment.

  The Cisco access point are currently authenticated by MAB, the customer wants to improve that I proposed to implement EAP-FAST speed of the MAB for the AP for a quick and easy solution.

  I work in the test and production environment, but I was cycling through the authentication process and found something strange.

  I created a rule that if the Tunnel network protocol is EAP-FAST are authenticated by internal users.

  It works very well, the ISE recognizes the flow and internal users through authenticatie.

  15041 assessment political identity
  15048 questioned PIP - Network Access.EapAuthentication
  15048 questioned PIP - Network Access.EapTunnel
  15004 Matched rule - EAP-FAST
  15013 selected identity Source - internal users
  24210 Looking user in IDStore of internal users - >
  24212 found user in internal users IDStore
  Authentication 22037 spent

  On the way he also decided to search for the user in Active Directory.

  Given that the user has not been created in Active Directory, that it does not.

  Looking 24432 user in Active Directory - >
  Identity resolution 24325 - >
  Search 24313 of corresponding accounts at the junction - >
  24318 no corresponding account found in the forest - >
  24322 identity resolution detected no corresponding case
  Failure of the 24352 - ERROR_NO_SUCH_USER identity resolution
  24412 not found user in Active Directory - >
  15048 questioned PIP - >. ExternalGroups
  15048 questioned PIP - Network Access.EapTunnel
  15004 Matched rule - AP_EAPFAST
  15016 selected the authorization - AP_Lan profile
  11002 returned access RADIUS acceptance

  So the authentication and authorization is successful but he try's to resolve the user in active directory.

  I checked the authentication for MAB process, and here I see the same error.

  The MAC address of the device used to MAB also is added to the ISE, then authentication through internal users, authentication and authorization is successful, but ISE wants to solve the (MAC address of the device) user in Active Directory.

  We also see this step for the flow of EAP - TLS, and in this case the identity stage via resolution is successful.

  Is it possible that I can disable the resolution of identity through AD when the internal user group? (or in the world?)

  I did some research and found this (search for LDAP users)

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.0/user_guide/ise10_man_id...

  When I look at our deployment, it is nothing configured under LDAP.

  If you have rules in your authorization rules that use ad groups that are in front of your MAB or the EAP-FAST rules, ISE will do a search to see if it needs to match this rule. Put your MAB and EAP-FAST rules about AD membership rules, and it won't do the research.