Cisco Scan host (Hostscan_3.1.04082 - k9.pkg)

Similar Questions

• VUM Scan host - host returns the error codes esxupdate: 10

  Morning everyone, I had trouble nailing this error code 10 I get all my hosts (ESXi 3 in total). Everywhere where I look it tells me that I am low on space, but when I check the outputs on all hosts, there seems to be more than enough available space.

  ~ # df h
  Size of filesystem used available use % mounted on
  visorfs 1.5 G 324.2 M 1.1 G 22%.
  VMFS3 499,8 G G 107.1 392,6 G 21% / vmfs/volumes/4ce1a8ee-814eb77e-1766-68b599e3df73
  vfat 285,9 M 140.7 M 145.2 M 49% / vmfs/volumes/3c3693e8-f77a642a-1910-5c6bdcb26d3a
  vfat 249.7 M 102.5 M 147.3 M 41% / vmfs/volumes/65092bef-de8a06b5-22db-2bbbc32dc3d2
  vfat 249.7 M 103.7 M 146.1 M 42% / vmfs/volumes/ff060de6-cecc88e5-4 d 14-8726d7ed0132
  VMFS3 499,8 G G 100.2 399,6 G 20% / vmfs/volumes/4ce1a92e-6c624d34-2cf3-68b599e3df73
  VMFS3 499,8 G 6.1 G 493.6 G 1% / vmfs/volumes/4ce1a909-d6b31dea-450f-68b599e3df73
  VMFS3 499,8 G G 281,6 218.2 G 56% / vmfs/volumes/4ce1a8cf-9914f00c-7975-68b599e3df73
  VMFS3 409,8 G G 204,8 205.0 G 50% / vmfs/volumes/4d5006ba-5fdcef08-6003-68b599e3df73
  ~ # vdf h
  Tardisk space used
  SYS1 201 201M M
  SYS2 55M 55 M
  SYS3                        1M        1M
  SYS4 12K 12K
  SYS5 12K 12K
  SYS6 42M 42 M
  SYS7 12M 12 M
  -----
  Size of the virtual disk used available use % mounted on
  MAINSYS 32M 4M 27M 14%-
  tmp 192M 4K M 191, 0%-
  updatestg 750M 64 K 749M 0%-
  78M 3 m 74 M 5% hostdstats-
  AAMconfig 128M 3 m 124M 2%-
  ~ #

  When I was looking for the VUM records the only thing I see is intresting is;

  Certificates to host television is not complete.
  [2011-02-23 09:38:59.652 02884 WARNING "Libs"] SSLVerifyIsEnabled: cannot read the registry value. Falling back to the default behavior: check off the coast. LastError = 0
  [2011-02-23 09:38:59.652 02884 WARNING "Libs"] SSLVerifyCertAgainstSystemStore: Verification of the certificate is disabled, so connection will continue despite the error
  [2011-02-23 09:38:59.652 02884 WARNING "Libs"] SSLVerifyCertAgainstSystemStore: The certificate of the remote host has these problems:

  vC and ESXi hosts are all up to date with 4.1u1 and I've also updated VUM and wasn't to ggetting no problem before these updates.

  Thank you

  Im having the same problem on 4 ESXi hosts.  IM wondering if it is the same problem on esxi embedded and installable? Mine are integrated and I used the Update Manager.

  Problem solved.  Spoke with VMWare and it looks like a bug.  They had me restart my hosts a second time and the errors disappear.  Then, after running the 4.1 update 1 on my hosts, and after that they charge, I ran a scan where I got the error.  The restarted again and now they work very well.

• Scan host to retrieve the names of m..

  Hello world. I would like to scna ESX hosts to obtain the names of virtual machine before ghettoVCBg2.pl. I just want to get a snapshot of every machine I have.

  In the old thread of comments, the script generateVMList.pl is mentioned. Anyone know where I can find it?

  Thanks in advance

  Which you mentioned call is actually correct, but Sourceforge recently got attacked and they have disabled some of the webviews, is why you can not access it. However, it is still available on sourceforge, but you will need to use SVN CLI which allows to reach the repository vGhetto. I enclose the script in this response pending

• vSphere Host Update Utility Scan Failed

  Hello world

  I recently updated my Dell PE2950iii ESXi 3.5 Embedded 4.0. After the upgrade, I was unable to patch the host after scanning and download the 2 patches available with success. So I decided (after reading the post of the user) to perform the repair on the CD of ESXi 4 option. The repair went through fine without any visible error. Now that I tried to scan and patch my host, I get an error that referred me to a viu - 3 log file. I'm not not to clear on how to read but I managed to find this piece of info that may be useful to determine what is at fault in my setup.

  2009-11-18 17:10:15.328 msg: cache location: / tmp/updatecache cache size: 260408 MB

  2009-11-18 17:10:15.328 msg: wrapper scan Host: scanning (all) started.

  2009-11-18 17:10:15.328 inf: managed fix manager using metadata URL:

  2009-11-18 17:10:15.328 inf: begin to download files to the host

  2009-11-18 17:10:15.328 inf: event posted: begin to download files to the host

  2009-11-18 17:10:15.328 inf: file: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\VMware\VMware VI Update/vmw/metadata/vmw-ESXi-4.0.0-metadata.zip to: /tmp/updatecache/vmw-ESXi-4.0.0-metadata.zip

  2009-11-18 17:10:15.328 inf: managed Manager patch file download, CBC: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\VMware\VMware VI Update/vmw/metadata/vmw-ESXi-4.0.0-metadata.zip, dst: /tmp/updatecache/vmw-ESXi-4.0.0-metadata.zip

  2009-11-18 17:10:15.328 msg: host scanner scanning (all) wrapper has no : I/o error has occurred. Failure details: System.IO.IOException: I/o error has occurred.

  Can someone advise me please on how to proceed?

  I'm sorry, I worked 10 hours and my eyes start to fail. I thought you had 0 space free not 0% used.

  Forget it. Try to run from the console:

   esxupdate -m https://hostupdate.vmware.com/software/VUM/PRODUCTION/vmw/vmw-ESXi-4.0.0-metadata.zip scan
  

  and

   esxupdate -m https://hostupdate.vmware.com/software/VUM/PRODUCTION/vmw/vmw-ESXi-4.0.0-metadata.zip update
  

  and paste the results.

• Disable or wiping "Cisco Configuration Professional Express."

  Hello

  We use a new Cisco1921-SEC/K9 comes with a new IOS (15.2 (4) M1). To use the feature of SSL - VPN from outside we activeted 'secure http server. I tried to check the security of the inside (we use ZBF) and it appeared a "Cisco Configuration Professional Express" Web page with Java "and so on" - brrr - who designed this thing?

  Now us whant to disable or wiping the "Cisco Configuration Professional Express." Subtract the *.pkg and *.cfg flash with charging has not worked.

  How can we remove this 'Cisco Configuration Professional Express', because we do not like ist! I can't find a flag to config or something in the flash...

  Grüße

  Steve

  Steve,

  You can follow the procedure in the CCP Admin Guide (here) for the withdrawal of CCP.

  TL; DR.? Well (2 c seems to be specific to an AP installation):

  To uninstall the Cisco CP Express Admin View of the router flash memory, perform the following steps:

  Step 1 On the router, go to the directory in which Cisco CP Express Admin View files using this command:

  router# cd flash: 

  Step 2 Use the delete command to remove all Cisco CP Express Admin display the files and folders of the router flash memory.

  

  Note Ensure that you delete the files extracted from the ccpexpress27Admin.tar file and the ccpExpress_ap_express - security.shtml.gz.

  a. remove the home.shtml file:

  router# delete /force /recursive home.shtml 

  b. delete the ccpexp folder:

  router# delete /force /recursive flash:ccpexp 

  c. remove the file ccpExpress_ap_express - security.shtml.gz in the folder ap802-xxxxx-xx.xxx-xxx.xxx/html/level/15/ of the AGP flash memory:

  ap# delete flash:/ap802-ccw7-mx.124-25d.JAX/html/level/15/ccpExpress_ap_express-security.shtml.gz

• Cisco SG300 SNMP with cacti

  I installed Cacti on ubuntu 14.04 and I'm trying to add a Cisco sg300.

  If the switch is configured like this:
  Server SNMP My Office location
  SNMP Server contact [email protected] / * /
  SNMP community - server MyC0mmun1ty ro 192.168.10.25 view by default

  I then in the settings of the device

  SwitchName Description
  The switch ip host name

  Cisco to host model router
  number of threads 1
  disable the unchecked host

  shot detection snmp device operating time
  ping timeout 400
  try again to pin 1

  SNMP version 2
  Community SNMP MyC0mmun1ty
  SNMP port 161
  SNMP timeout 500
  OIDs maximum 10

  from the cactus Server (192.168.10.25) if I have
  Nmap - sU Pei 161 switch ip of see:
  161/udp snmp open

  also on the sg300 I had to enable snmp in the security settings where ssh/telnet etc. is and have saved the config.

  But watch the cactus
  SNMP information
  SNMP error

  OK, I suggest you enable the SNMP agent on unrestricted IP switch, IE replace command:

   snmp-server community MyC0mmun1ty ro 192.168.10.25 view Default

  with the command:

   snmp-server community MyC0mmun1ty ro view Default

  and again snmpwalk. If it will work now, your SNMP to Cacti server applications are sourcing from another IP than 192.168.10.25 (your Cacti server configured several IP?).

• Maintenance mode that is required to scan?

  Our best practices has always been to put the hosts in maintenance first mode, and then analyze the updates with the Update Manager. We seek to implement scheduled scans, and the only thing stopping us is our practice of the mode of maintenance in advance. Is this necessary? Or are we able to scan hosts for production with active virtual machines safely?

  Yes, you can scan the hosts while they have running VMs. Maintenance mode is not necessary for this.

• Network host connectivity problem

  Hi all
  I have a bit of a strange an ESXi 5 U1 host connectivity problem. The host has a network card in the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet, and from there it can ping both devices but cannot ping to two other devices. To explain a little better:
  There are two hosts with identical hardware (HP ProLiant DL380 G6) both built with the same picture of ESXi 5 U1 from HP.
  There is an IP address on the switch (Cisco 3750 gigabit) management.
  There are two servers running Openfiler, which I'll use for ISCSI data banks.
  All these devices are in the same VLAN in the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet. host 1 is identical to the 2 host configuration (bar IP address and host name, etc.). Host can ping all devices on the subnet 1 and maybe ping by all devices on the seubnet. 2, the one with the issue of the host can ping and ping the Cisco FoxyCode and host 1, but cannot ping or ping by one of the two boxes openfiler.
  Research on the openfiler boxes I see missing entries in the arp (marked as incomplete) table. Host 2 he entered complete arp for the openfiler boxes. A trace of the wireshark package shows the openfilers sending arp requests but no response from host 2. The Cisco and host 1 to get the answers.
  I have patched the critical fixes host 2 until the last critical and no, applied the latest versions of firmware HP etc. Swapped, cables, tried different switch ports and even different NICs on host 2, all to nothing does not. The Cisco ports configured all identically from host 1. The openfiler boxes are set up with interfaces servile and the Cisco switch ports are etherchannelled for these. There is no etherchannel or link aggregation etc for guests, straight connection to the front in the VLAN.
  Interestingly, all devices also has an interface in the 192.168.2.0/sous-reseau 24 for management and all devices can see all other devices here absolutely fine.
  If anyone has any ideas on where to go from here please let me know, I'm going crazy trying to understand this one!

  ts999 wrote:

  The openfiler boxes are set up with interfaces servile and the Cisco switch ports are etherchannelled for these.

  I wonder if the Etherchannels in Openfiler servers might not work. Depending on how the switch load balances executives, this could cause a host to work and the other is not.

• How to change the hostname of scan

  We have a 11.2.0.3 cluster on Linux that uses IP scan.  We have 3 instances of database node running on this Setup.  Scan host name is TSLSERV01.xxx.com.  Now we want to display this SCAN as TSLSERV01 hostname - SCAN.xxx.com, what are the things we must do in order to change this?  Any note or doc will be useful.

  Hello

  You can follow these steps to do this:ORACLE-BASE of Configuration change SCAN in Oracle 11 g Release 2 RAC -

  HTH

• Option of DAP for the verification of the registry for remote access VPN Anyconnect v 3.0 + users

  Hi all

  I'm trying to assign the attribute DAP users VPN (Anyconnect 3.0 +) who fulfil certain conditions of registry. When setting up political DAP, while selecting the condition of the register, it is in error as "secure desktop cisco (CSD) is not enabled, CSD should be enabled to configure the registry endpoint attribute. But as I link percevied, to check the attribute registry "scan host' which is integrated in the module anyconnect 3.0 will be charged. So why he asks me to activate the CSD? CSD is really necessary to verify the registry attribute even if we use anyconenct 3.0 +? Any pointer

  The end of the ASA must be activated and more bits based on AnyConnect.

  Notes elsewhere in the link you quoted, it is said ' host Scan automatically identifies the operating systems and service packs on any remote device establishing a clientless SSL VPN and AnyConnect Cisco client session and when the host Scan/CSD or CSD is activated on the SAA. " (emphasis added).

  FYI Cisco is to denigrate these features over time for the Posture of scanning at the ISE in conjunction with the new posture AnyConnect 4.0 module.

• What are the causes an IP internal to "attack" multiple public IP addresses?

  We had to many TCP SYN host sweep. Could someone share what could cause the above? Follow copies of the alert details.

  evIdsAlert: eventId = 1216742775473866070 = severity = informational Cisco vendor

  Author:

  hostId: ips

  appName: sensorApp

  appInstanceId: 403

  time: August 8, 2008 19:18:53 UTC offset = 480 timeZone = GMT-08:00

  signature: description = TCP SYN host Sweep id = 3030 = S2 version

  subsigId: 0

  marsCategory: probe/SpecificPorts

  interfaceGroup: vs0

  VLAN: 0

  participants:

  striker:

  addr: 172.16.5.111 locality = OUT

  Port: 3958

  target:

  addr: 69.63.178.11 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 64.62.193.70 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 77.67.127.41 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 64.215.162.27 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 65.55.15.242 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 77.67.127.10 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 69.63.176.167 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 65.242.27.32 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 64.209.118.140 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 77.67.127.25 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 207.200.64.225 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 207.68.179.219 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 65.55.13.158 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 63.217.8.128 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 66.151.244.212 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  target:

  addr: 207.200.64.161 locality = OUT

  OS: idSource = unknown type = unknown = relevant

  alertDetails: InterfaceAttributes: = 'Unknown' physical context = 'Unknown' bottom of basket = "GigabitEthernet0/1 ';

  riskRatingValue: 31 targetValueRating = average attackRelevanceRating = relevant

  threatRatingValue: 31

  Interface: GigabitEthernet0/1 context unknown physical = unknown = backplane = GigabitEthernet0/1

  Protocol: tcp

  Scans when detected on the network local are "mostly" false positives, that's the official word from Cisco:

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/Security/Center/viewIpsSignature.x?signatureId=3030&signatureSubId=0&softwareVersion=6.0&releaseVersion=S2

  "Benign triggers.

  Scan host 3030 and 3032 signatures detect behaviors that cannot be observed from sources outside the local network, but are normal behaviors for sources within the local network. »

  You can filter these signatures of the LAN hosts using event Action filters or tune the signature (using the source / dest. fields inside).

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• Port 80 connection refused on localhost

  Hello

  I am trying to solve a problem that I am having with the virtual hosts in Apache 2.4 on one of my two Macs, both running El Capitan. On a Mac, use virtual hosts without a hitch on another, I get connection refused.

  ↪ curl -I -L test.dev 15:51:08
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:51:17 GMT
Server: Apache/2.4.16 (Unix)
Last-Modified: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 08:52:04 GMT
ETag: "c-5265f1673f500"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 12


  Content-Type: text/html

  vs.

  ↪ curl -I -L test.dev 15:51:01
curl: (7) Failed to connect to test.dev port 80: Connection refused

  My question is not on Apache or the configuration of the vhosts, / etc/hosts, etc. All that is not the issue here. The only difference between the two Macs I can find is in the Port Scan output. The right seems to have port 80 open:

  Port Scanning host: 127.0.0.1

  Open TCP Port: 22 ssh
  Open TCP Port: 53 domain
  Open TCP Port: 80 http
  Open TCP Port: 88 kerberos
  Open TCP Port: 445 microsoft-ds
  Open TCP Port: 548 afpovertcp
  Open TCP Port: 631 ipp


  СКАНИРОВАНИЕ ПОРТОВ ЗАВЕРШЕНО...

  While it is not bad:

  Port Scanning host: 127.0.0.1

  Open TCP Port: 88 kerberos
  Open TCP Port: 445 microsoft-ds
  Open TCP Port: 548 afpovertcp
  Open TCP Port: 631 ipp
Сканирование портов завершено…

  Could someone explain why port 80 is not on this machine and how do I enable it?

  All the best,

  Tench

  To make sure that port 80 is open for TCP on all interfaces, I added

  pass in proto tcp from any to any port 80 

  à /etc.pf.conf . Reloading of pfctl(8) didn't quite do the trick, but did a reboot. Now, the port appears as open in the port scan, and my virtual hosts are served as it should.

• MFP HP LaserJet Pro M126nw: Clarification of the use of HP Laser Jet MFP M126 nw Pro Page

  Hi support them.

  Recently, we bought a new HP Laserhet MFO M126nw Pro. The cartridge came with the new printer. I need a clarification of the HP Laserjet Pro MFP M126nw on the usage Page.

  We want to know how many pages that the printer has taken so far, printing and also how many pages is analysed and the copier took how many pages.

  I have attached the report using page for your reference.

  Please specify the things below.

  Pages for the scanned copy = 65

  I think he has counted only scanned copies 65.le is okay?

  2. What is Monochrome pages printed from copy = 66

  3. What is pages scanned host = 86

  4. print engine:

  1. total Impressions showing 829.

  Overall, I think it's showing printing, copier, 580 the scanned pages. Is this OK.

  2. What is jam events?

  It's showing 1.

  3. What is EconoMode Impressions?

  showing 0.

  4. What is monochrome prints?

  showing that 829

  Need to clarify the details above for my knowledge.

  Your support is much appreciated.

  Thanks in advance

  Concerning

  R.Pradeep

  the digital and print values are different.

  pages scanned copy 65 - this means that 65 pages have been executed by the scanner with someone using the copy function. the report shows 66 printed pages 'copy' which means 64 of these copies were only a single copy and 1 scan someone made 2 copies - which gives you a total of 66 pages printed from the copy function.

  pages scanned to accommodate 86 = that means 86 pages were executed by the scanner with a person who uses the "scan to network folder" or "scan to computer" function

  That's a total of total of 151 pages run through your scanner. only 2 values that you add to the scanner are the "copy" and «scan to host» numbers copy of 65 + 86 scan-to-host ='s 151 total scans

  total impressions are 829. pages printed from copy fuction are 66 - if you subtract 66 829 that gives you the number of pages that have been printed from a computer = 763

  763 pages printed computer + 66 pages printed using the copy function = 829 total number of pages printed

• AnyConnect 2.3.254

  Hello

  I have a problem with the new feature in AnyConnect 2.3.254 that allows to establish a VPN inside connection RDP of Windows XP SP2.

  I replaced the following string: "LocalUsersOnly" with "AllowRemoteUsers" in my profile.xml within "c:\documents and settings\all users\application data\cisco\cisco anyconnect vpn client\profile\.

  However, when I try to establish a VPN via RDP, I get the message: "capacity VPN set up a remote desktop is disabled. A VPN connection can be established. »

  I use tunneling split on the VPN network I want to connect to. However, I have improved my Anyconnect only on my computer-RDP and not on my Cisco ASA 5505. Who is likely to be the problem? Cisco still has the 2.2.140 pkg-image and ASA 8.0 (4) and ASDM 6.13.

  Hope someone can help.

  Thank you.

  See you soon,.

  Harald

  I managed to get this to work, and did so by downloading the XML model changed to the ASA and pushing down to the client when connecting.

  Download the ASA profile using tftp or through ASDM and add the following line to the webvpn configuration:

  SVC profiles PROFILE-MY-NAME disk0: / AnyConnectProfile.tmpl

  You should be able to push down through Group Policy, but I chose to do it on a per user (that I have only a single test user) basis:

  user testuser name attributes
  WebVPN
  MY-PROFILE-NAME value of SVC profiles

  Example of using of strategy group:

  mon-vpn-attribute group group policy
  WebVPN
  MY-PROFILE-NAME value of SVC profiles

  I don't think I left something out, but if you continue to have bad let me know.

  James

• Comments on AP541N network

  Hello everyone.  I am trying to configure a wireless network of comments that isolates comments from the internal network and the internet access network and have been so far unsuccessful here, I will describe my setup below.

  The AP has two Setup wireless networks in this regard, one is the primary network, using the vlan 1 and wpa (which works without any problems), the second is what is supposed to be comments, and using its wifi vlan 5 and no security (on this one I just changed the name of the cisco-scan network)

  On the switch (SG-200-50), the AP is on port 8, that is configured as a member of the vlan 5 (marked, unmarked on vlan 1) and 24 port (marked on the vlan 5 marked in the vlan 1) turns to port two on a cisco ASA 5505, port 2 is configured on an interface called DMZ, this interface uses the security level 50 and also uses the vlan 5 for its ports.  on this interface, due to licensing restrictions rather stupid, I can't configure the interface as a trunk, nor can I create another interface and use that one as a trunk, so I'm stuck with the help of the DMZ interface.  I also install a DHCP server to use a different subent internal network flat on the addresses.

  Problem is that whenever I connect to the network comments I can't ping the address assigned to the DMZ interface, no matter what I do, or it will give addresses.  If I hang directly to the port on the router with my laptop it works fine, internet access is in place, no access to the internal network and dhcp works perfectly, but if I try to access it through the switch then it does not work.

  If I can provide more information please let me know and thank you in advance for any help you can provide.

  Hello

  From my understanding, the problem is with ASA connection with switch. An access on ASA port is connected to the trunk on the switch port. If the marked packets from VLAN 5 will be abandoned about penetration ASA. Here is my suggestion to my laboratory. Connect the ports of two ASA access to ports two access switch with access virtual LANs (VLAN not signposted) matching. Connect to a trunk port on switch with (1UT, 5T) AP541N with two SSIDS. This configuration has worked for me.

  Please evaluate the useful ports, while others may find quick answers.