client vpn Cisco router cisco 880 - Private ip addresses is not only the public ip

Similar Questions

• Client VPN Cisco router Cisco, MSW CA + certificates

  Dear Sirs,
  Let me approach you on the following problem.

  I wanted to use a secure between the Cisco VPN client connection
  (Windows XP) and Cisco 2821 with certificate-based authentication.
  I used the Microsoft certification authority (Windows 2003 server).
  Cisco VPN client used eTokenPRO Aladdin as a certificate store.

  Certificate of MSW CA registration and implementation in eToken ran OK
  Customer VPN Cisco doesn't have a problem with the cooperation of eToken.
  Certificate of registration of Cisco2821 MSW ca ran okay too.

  Cisco 2821 configuration is standard. IOS version 12.4 (6).

  Attempt to connect to the client VPN Cisco on Cisco 2821 was
  last update of the error messages:

  ISAKMP: (1020): cannot get router cert or routerdoes do not have a cert: had to find DN!
  ISAKMP: (1020): ITS been RSA signature authentication more XAUTH using id ID_FQDN type
  ISAKMP (1020): payload ID
  next payload: 6
  type: 2
  FULL domain name: cisco - ca.firm.com
  Protocol: 17
  Port: 500
  Length: 25
  ISAKMP: (1020): the total payload length: 25
  ISAKMP (1020): no cert string to send to peers
  ISAKMP (1020): peer not specified not issuing and none found appropriate profile
  ISAKMP (1020): Action of WSF returned the error: 2
  ISAKMP: (1020): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
  ISAKMP: (1020): former State = new State IKE_R_MM5 = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

  Is there some refence where is possible to find some information on
  This problem? There is someone who knows how to understand these mistakes?
  Thank you very much for your help.

  Best regards
  P.Sonenberk

  PS Some useful information for people who are interested in the above problem.

  Address IP of Cisco 2821 10.1.1.220, client VPN IP address is 10.1.1.133.
  MSW's IP 10.1.1.50.
  Important parts of the Cisco 2821 configuration:

  !
  cisco-ca hostname
  !
  ................
  AAA new-model
  !
  AAA authentication login default local
  AAA authentication login sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
  AAA authorization exec default local
  AAA authorization sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 LAN
  !
  ...............
  IP domain name firm.com
  host IP company-cu 10.1.1.50
  host to IP cisco-vpn1 10.1.1.133
  name of the IP-server 10.1.1.33
  !
  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-4097309259
  enrollment selfsigned
  name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 4097309259
  revocation checking no
  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-4097309259
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint company-cu
  registration mode ra
  Enrollment url http://10.1.1.50:80/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll
  use of ike
  Serial number no
  IP address no
  password 7 005C31272503535729701A1B5E40523647
  revocation checking no
  !
  TP-self-signed-4097309259 crypto pki certificate chain
  certificate self-signed 01
  30820249 308201B 2 A0030201 02020101 300 D 0609 2A 864886 F70D0101 04050030
  .............
  FEDDCCEA 8FD14836 24CDD736 34
  quit smoking
  company-cu pki encryption certificate chain
  certificate 1150A66F000100000013
  30820509 308203F1 A0030201 02020 HAS 11 092A 8648 01000000 13300 06 50A66F00
  ...............
  9E417C44 2062BFD5 F4FB9C0B AA
  quit smoking
  certificate ca 51BAC7C822D1F6A3469D1ADC32D0EB8C
  30820489 30820371 A0030201 BAC7C822 02021051 D1F6A346 9D1ADC32 D0EB8C30
  ...............
  C379F382 36E0A54E 0A6278A7 46
  quit smoking
  !
  ...................
  crypto ISAKMP policy 30
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  authentication rsa-BA
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto identity hostname
  !
  Configuration group customer isakmp crypto Group159
  key Key159Key
  pool SDM_POOL_1
  ACL 100
  !
  the crypto isakmp client configuration group them
  domain firm.com
  pool SDM_POOL_1
  ACL 100
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac 3DES-MD5
  !
  crypto dynamic-map SDM_DYNMAP_1 1
  the transform-set 3DES-MD5 value
  market arriere-route
  !
  card crypto SDM_CMAP_1 client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
  map SDM_CMAP_1 isakmp authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 crypto
  client configuration address map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto answer
  map SDM_CMAP_1 65535-isakmp dynamic SDM_DYNMAP_1 ipsec crypto
  !
  ................
  !
  end

  status company-cu of Cisco-ca #show cryptographic pki trustpoints
  Trustpoint company-cu:
  Issuing CA certificate configured:
  Name of the object:
  CN = firm-cu, dc = company, dc = local
  Fingerprint MD5: 5026582F 8CF455F8 56151047 2FFAC0D6
  Fingerprint SHA1: 47B 74974 7C85EA48 760516DE AAC84C5D 4427E829
  Universal router configured certificate:
  Name of the object:
  host name = cisco - ca.firm.com
  Fingerprint MD5: E78702ED 47D5D36F B732CC4C BA97A4ED
  Fingerprint SHA1: 78DEAE7E ACC12F15 1DFB4EB8 7FC DC6F3B7E 00138
  State:
  Generated keys... Yes (general purpose, not exportable)
  Authenticated issuing certification authority... Yes
  Request certificate (s)... Yes

  Cisco-ca #sh crypto pubkey-door-key rsa
  Code: M - configured manually, C - excerpt from certificate

  Name of code use IP-address/VRF Keyring
  C Signature name of X.500 DN default:
  CN = firm-cu
  DC = company
  DC = local

  C signature by default cisco-vpn1

  IMPORTANT: I don't have a Cisco IOS Software: 12.4 (5), 12.3 (11) T08, 12.4 (4.7) PI03c,.
  12.4 (4.7) T - there is error in the cryptographic module.

  Hey guys, it's weird that the router is not find cert after IKE is the cert and validates, it is certainly not reason, but I would go ahead and set up the mapping of certificate on this router to force the client to associate with Group of IKE, for that matter, that you need to change your config a bit for use iskamp profiles :

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gt_isakp.html

• What clients VPN Cisco 2811 supports?

  Is the solution of VPN Cisco 2811 locked customers cisco or that market with other brands too?

  Best regards Tommy Svensson

  Hello

  With the correct IOS feature set, it will support IPsec VPN clients. This includes not only the Cisco VPN client but almost any standard IPsec client.

  In addition, if on the 2811 can accept any browser SSL VPN connections, or even use the AnyConnect SSL client.

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• I deployed a private teredo server, I'm not using the public prefix 2001: 0 / 32, instead, I use the prefix 2001:2222 / 32

  Original title: windows 7 Teredo: how to configure the teredo prefix

  Hello

  I deployed a private teredo server, I'm not using the public prefix 2001: 0 / 32, instead, I use the prefix 2001:2222 / 32
  But I got win7 can't connect to my server if I use the prefix 2001:2222 / 32.
  A test, I put the prefix 2001: 0 / 32, win7 it can connect.
  How can I do so that win7 customer teredo can connect to my private server that use the prefix 2001:2222 / 32?

  Hi,

  The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums.

  I would recommend posting your query in the link below.

  Windows Server forums:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer

  I hope that the information above helps you.

• Client Vpn Cisco vpn remote site inaccessible (one site to another)

  Hello

  I configured two vpn with pix 515 cisco connection. One using a cisco vpn client and another another site to site vpn connectin with other pix.

  I have my local network with 192.168.149.0 network, vpn clinet pool with 192.168.17.0 network and a remote site with 192.168.145.0.

  Client vpn local network accessible and always remote site, but 192.168.17.0 (vpn client) 192.168.145.0 not accessible (remote site).

  Plese help me!

  Thank you

  This scenario is possible with no v6.x, v7.x

  the link below is an example of configuration:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a008046f307.shtml

• VPN Cisco ASA 5540 L2L - one-way traffic only for the pair to a network

  Hello

  I'm a little confused as to which is the problem. This is the premise for the problem I have face.

  One of our big clients has a Cisco ASA5540 (8.2 (2)) failover (active / standby). Early last year, we have configured a VPN from Lan to Lan to a 3rd party site (a device of control point on their end). He worked until early this week when suddenly the connection problems.

  Only 1 of the 3 networks the / guests can access a remote network on the other side. 2 others have suddenly stopped working. We do not know of any change on our side and the remote end also insists that their end configurations are correct (and what information they sent me it seems to be correct)

  So essentially the encryption field is configured as follows:

  access-list line 1 permit extended ip 10.238.57.21 host 10.82.0.202 (hitcnt = 2)
  access-list line 2 extended permit ip 10.207.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 (hitcnt = 198)
  access-list line 3 extended permit ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 (hitcnt = 173)

  Free NAT has been configured as follows (names modified interfaces):

  NAT (interface1) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-VPN-SHEEP

  the INTERIOR-VPN-SHEEP line 1 permit access list extended ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  permit for Access-list SHEEP-VPN-INSIDE line lengthened 2 ip host 10.238.57.21 10.82.0.202

  NAT (interface2) 0-list of access VPN-SHEEP

  VPN-SHEEP line 1 permit access list extended ip 10.207.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252

  After the problem started only 10.207.0.0/16 network connections worked for the site remote 10.82.0.200/30. All other connections do not work.

  There has been no change made on our side and on the side remote also insists there has been no change. I also checked how long the ASAs have been upward and how long the same device has been active in the failover. Both have been at the same time (about a year)

  The main problem is that users of the 10.231.191.0/24 cant access remote network network. However, the remote user can initiate and implement the VPN on their side but usually get any return traffic. Ive also checked that the routes are configured correctly in the routers in core for the return of their connections traffic should go back to the firewall.

  Also used of "packet - trace" event raising the VPN tunnel (even if it passes the phases VPN). For my understanding "packet - trace" alone with the IP source and destination addresses must activate the VPN connection (even if it generates no traffic to the current tunnel).

  This is printing to the following command: "packet - trace entry interface1 tcp 10.231.191.100 1025 10.82.0.203 80.

  Phase: 1
  Type: ACCESS-LIST
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Implicit rule
  Additional information:
  MAC access list

  Phase: 2
  Type: FLOW-SEARCH
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  Not found no corresponding stream, creating a new stream

  Phase: 3
  Type:-ROUTE SEARCH
  Subtype: entry
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  in 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252 outside

  Phase: 4
  Type: ACCESS-LIST
  Subtype: Journal
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Access-group interface interface1
  access-list extended allow ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  Additional information:

  Phase: 5
  Type: IP-OPTIONS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 6
  Type: INSPECT
  Subtype: np - inspect
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  class-map inspection_default
  match default-inspection-traffic
  Policy-map global_policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect the http
  global service-policy global_policy
  Additional information:

  Phase: 7
  Type: FOVER
  Subtype: Eve-updated
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 8
  Type: NAT-FREE
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 outside 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  Exempt from NAT
  translate_hits = 32, untranslate_hits = 35251
  Additional information:

  -Phase 9 is a static nat of the problem to another network interface. Don't know why his watch to print.

  Phase: 9
  Type: NAT
  Subtype: host-limits
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  static (interface1, interface3) 10.231.0.0 10.231.0.0 255.255.0.0 subnet mask
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.0.0 255.255.0.0 interface3 all
  static translation at 10.231.0.0
  translate_hits = 153954, untranslate_hits = 88
  Additional information:

  -Phase 10 seems to be the default NAT for the local network configuration when traffic is to the Internet

  Phase: 10
  Type: NAT
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  NAT (interface1) 5 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0
  NAT-control
  is the intellectual property inside 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 outside of any
  dynamic translation of hen 5 (y.y.y.y)
  translate_hits = 3048900, untranslate_hits = 77195
  Additional information:

  Phase: 11
  Type: VPN
  Subtype: encrypt
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 12
  Type: VPN
  Subtype: ipsec-tunnel-flow
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 13
  Type: IP-OPTIONS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:

  Phase: 14
  Type: CREATING STREAMS
  Subtype:
  Result: ALLOW
  Config:
  Additional information:
  New workflow created with the 1047981896 id, package sent to the next module

  Result:
  input interface: interface1
  entry status: to the top
  entry-line-status: to the top
  output interface: outside
  the status of the output: to the top
  output-line-status: to the top
  Action: allow

  So, basically, the connection should properly go to connect VPN L2L but yet is not. I tried to generate customer traffic of base (with the source IP address of the client network and I see the connection on the firewall, but yet there is absolutely no encapsulated packets when I check "crypto ipsec to show his" regarding this connection VPN L2L.) Its almost as if the firewall only transfers the packets on the external interface instead of encapsulating for VPN?

  And as I said, at the same time the remote end can activate the connection between these 2 networks very well, but just won't get any traffic back to their echo ICMP messages.

  access-list extended allow ip 10.231.191.0 255.255.255.0 10.82.0.200 255.255.255.252
  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.231.191.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.82.0.200/255.255.255.252/0/0)
  current_peer: y.y.y.y

  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
  #pkts decaps: 131, #pkts decrypt: 131, #pkts check: 131
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 0, comp #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
  success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0
  Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0
  #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

  If it was just a routing problem it would be a simple thing to fix, but it is not because I can see the connection I have to confirm it by the router base on the firewall, but they don't just get passed on to the VPN connection.

  Could this happen due to a bug in the Software ASA? Would this be something with Checkpoint VPN device? (I have absolutely no experience with devices of control point)

  If there is any essential information that I can give, please ask.

  -Jouni

  Jouni,

  8.2.4.1 is the minimum - 8.2.4 had some issues (including TCP proxy).

  If this does not resolve the problem - I suggest open TAC box to get to the bottom of this ;-)

  Marcin

• VPN question: ISP assigned a private ip address

  Hi all

  Internet-online-online headquarters VPN 3015 concentrator

  Users remote VPN Client connected to the internet using a private ip address provided by the ISP (cable) is to establish a VPN tunnel, but they can not ping our private network.

  The only way to get the VPN works is when remote users use a public ip.

  It is a question of Cisco VPN Client? Or it has a solution...

  Thanks in advance,

  Kind regards

  Carlos Welhous

  Network engineer

  Hi Carlos,

  If your ISP gave you a private address, they must use NAT - in which case you will have to enable NAT - T on the VPN concentrator.

  To configure the NAT - T in the world, go to Configuration | System | Tunnelling protocols. IPSec | Screen of transparent NAT and check on NAT - T IPSec case.

• Cisco WLC 2504 - Access Points do not reach the controller

  Hello world

  We bougth a Cisco WLC 2504 with two AIR-AP2702I-UXK9 Access Points. The problem is that the AP do not join the WLC.
  The output from 'show join ap stats' shows the following:

  (Cisco Controller) > view join ap stats summary all the

  Database Mac EthernetMac AP AP name IP address Status
  00:35: 1a: B1:A9:60 00:f2:8 b: f4:1 has: 9 c AP00f2.8bf4.1a9c 192.168.10.23 joined not
  00:35: 1a: C9:99:B0 00:f2:8 b: 77:b7:fc AP00f2.8b77.b7fc not joined 192.168.10.24

  (Cisco Controller) > show join ap 00:35:1 detailed stats to: b1:a9:60

  Synchronization phase statistics
  -For the synchronization request has received... Does not apply
  -For the synchronization completed... Does not apply

  Discovery phase statistics
  -Applications received discovered... 114
  -Answers success of discovery... 114
  -Discovery failure processing... 0
  -Purpose of the last unsuccessful attempt of discovery... Does not apply
  -Attempt to finally successful discovery time... 20:15:40.106 16 June
  -Discovery attempt ultimately unsuccessful time... Does not apply

  Join the live statistics
  -Join applications received... 57
  -Join sent successful responses... 57
  -Processing of the join request without success... 0
  -Purpose of the last unsuccessful attempt to join... Does not apply
  -Attempt to join finally managed time... 20:15:50.414 16 June
  -Join finally failed time... Does not apply

  Configuration phase statistics

  -Configuration requests... 114
  -Answers configuration successful... 0
  -Processing configuration failed... 57
  -Purpose of the last unsuccessful attempt to Setup... Invalid license in the application configuration
  -Attempt to finally successful configuration time... Does not apply
  -Time finally failed configuration attempt... 20:15:50.810 16 June

  Last the decryption of the AP details failure messages
  -Last message decryption failure reason... Does not apply

  Details of recent disconnection AP
  -Last AP connection failure reason... Does not apply
  -Last reason for disconnection AP... Unknown failure reason

  Latest summary join error
  -Type of error that occurred in the last... Application of configuration rejected LWAPP
  -Reason for the error that took place the last... Invalid license in the application configuration
  -Time which occurred the last error to join... 20:15:50.810 16 June

  Details of sign-out AP
  -Last AP connection failure reason... Does not apply
  Ethernet Mac: c 00:f2:8 b: f4:1 has: 9 Ip address: 192.168.10.23

  Would be grateful for the help.

  Best regards
  Marc

  Hi Marc,

  Make sure first that your controller has software code 8.0.x or above, if first better it. Here's the code recommended by TAC

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/wireless-LAN-Controller-software/200046-TAC-recommended-AireOS.html

  Then, try the UX above deployment guide to begin. Under Advanced tab WLAN, you need to enable "of the first universal ap' in order to use this app provisioning & connect to the AP.

  If you have more than 1 AP, then you must start 1AP using this application. Other access points that you can feed them upward, while AP original is also powered, so they'll use protocal called NDP & start them automatically

  Let us know how it goes

  HTH

  Rasika

  Pls note all useful responses *.

• Client VPN Cisco ASA 5505 Cisco 1841 router

  Hello. I'm doing a connection during a cisco vpn client and a vpn on one server asa 5505 behind a 1841 router (internet adsl2 + and NAT router).

  My topology is almost as follows

  customer - tunnel - 1841 - ASA - PC

  ASA is the endpoint vpn (outside interface) device. I forward udp port 500 and 4500 on my router to the ASA and the tunnel rises. I exempt nat'ting on the asa and the router to the IP in dhcp vpn pool. I can connect to my tunnel but I can't "see" anything in the internal network. I allowed all traffic from the outside inwards buy from the ip vpn pool and I still send packets through the tunnel and I get nothing. I take a look at the statistics on the vpn client and I 2597 bytes (ping traffic) and there are no bytes. Any idea?

  Where you you logged in when you took the "crypto ipsec to show his"? If this isn't the case then try again, also this option allows IPSEC over UDP 4500 and it is disabled, enable it.

  ISAKMP nat-traversal crypto

  Just enter the command as it is, then try to connect again after activation of this option and get the same result to see the.

• Client VPN CISCO 857

  Hello

  I would like to know if CISCO 857 allows customers of Cisco VPN remote apart from site to site VPN software. I have heard that all cable cisco VPN devices allow connections to cisco VPN client software, is it true?

  Thanks a lot for your help

  Juan Manuel

  Juan,

  Let me explain a little further in order to clarify some of the terminology used, which could lead to confusion.

  Router Cisco VPN may terminate the following types of tunnels.

  Lan to Lan tunnels has.

  b. dynamic tunnels of Lan to Lan

  c. connections from VPN clients

  d. ends for easy VPN clients

  a & b are very similar

  c & d are very similar

  except - option c uses VPN (software) clients installed on the PC or MAC systems

  Option d, material uses to connect to the IOS routers. You can use a router or a PIX firewall or a 3002 or ASA to connect to the Cisco router that would act as an IOS Easy VPN server. But the device to connect to the easy VPN server is called an easy VPN client.

  Hope that explains the terminology a little more in detail.

  To answer your question, safety feature Easy VPN client and server support.

  And what you're trying to accomplish is option c. Thus, security feature option should work well for you.

  Hope that explains your queries.

  The rate of this post, if that helps!

  Thank you

  Gilbert

• Client VPN Cisco 1811 & Shrewsoft 2.10

  Hello

  I'm a total Cisco / novice who inherited the responsibilities of network management for our small office network and I need help to set up a VPN that office staff or customers can access at home or office customers. We have a number of public facing IP addresses, one of them is currently not used and we would like to use it for our VPN (say the address is 44.55.66.77 GW is 44.55.66.78 and mask 255.255.255.252 uses Xauth and mutual PSK) for access to our internal network (192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.254) an internal DHCP server distributes 192.168.1.100 through 192.168.1.199 addresses.

  I tried to copy a certain router configs, I found by Google, but I had no chance whatsoever, so I really hope someone can post a config to work for the 1811 router and Setup for the client Shrewsoft. An explanation (tutorial) and would really help, but I'd settle for something that works.

  Thanks in advance

  Brad,

  The other Fast 2-8 ports are layer 2 ports (switch ports), so not possible to assign an IP address.
  You can configure a VLAN Interface to associate the ports and create different IP subnets.

  The VPN connection creates a virtual map of VPN (RLAN) that reports an IP address from the pool
  as you mentioned (you should see this information if the client is connected with success).

  In order to access the other subnets via the VPN, you must include these networks in 101 ACLs.

  Federico

• Client VPN CISCO ASA for Android

  Hi guys

  I just received a request from a client who said he expects the procedure to establish a VPN from an Android device, as far as I know there is a soft ANYCONNECT but in my case, the client uses a CISCO VPN CLIENT, in this case it is possible to configure a VPN connection on the device, or I should use ANYCONNECT?

  Kind regards.

  Connection via the android client will be like the legacy cisco VPN client connection. You need only anyconnect mobile licenses if you connect with the android anyconnect client.  Using the android client built in will consume licenses peer IPSEC. If no additional license not required.

• client vpn Cisco pix 501

  I wonder and wonder, is it possible for a branch (2 vpn clients) to connect to the central location (cisco 501 pix) at the same time via the vpn client with a public address on each side. If this is not the case, what will be the way to make it work without additional equipment (another pix of cisco).

  Yes you can, you should check your os 6.3 a pix and you enable nat-transapency: -.

  ISAKMP nat-traversal 20

• Cannot install the Client VPN Cisco due error 1722

  Dear,

  I went to istall the Cisco VPN Client SW. But my laptoop installation finished with error 1722. Here is the log file fagment:

  MSI (s) (74:B0) [12:07:23:006]: product: Cisco Systems VPN Client 5.0.07.0440 - error 1722. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A program run as part of the Setup did not finish as expected. Contact your provider to support personal or package.  Action CsCaExe_VAInstall, location: C:\Program Files (x 86) \Cisco Systems\VPN Client\VAInst64.exe, command: nopopup I "C:\Program Files (x 86) \Cisco Client\Setup\CVirtA64.inf" CS_VirtA

  I use Windows 7 Home Premium on my laptop, the UAC turned OFF and the antivir SW is uninstalled. I searched on the net but I do not find a satisfactory solution.

  Please someone knows how can I fix this?

  Thank you

  Milan

  Hello

  The question you posted would be better suited to the TechNet community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/w7itpro

  Hope this information is useful.

• Client VPN Cisco and Cisco Secure

  Cisco VPN client and the VPN from Cisco Secure client free to use with pix firewall software?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  If you have a valid contract to Cisco and you can get the following link:

  http://www.Cisco.com/Kobayashi/SW-Center/SW-VPN.shtml

  with your CCO login, then you should be able to use these customers at no cost because they are already covered by the contract.

  Thank you and best regards,

  Abdelouahed

  -=-=-