Clocked at 100%

Similar Questions

• Satellite U500 - clocked at 100%

  I am using a Satellite U500 running Windows 7. Recently its been suspended quite often and I found the problem to be the processor clocked at 100%. RAM is not even 50% used when this happens. I opened the Task Manager to find the offending process, and nothing seems to use simultaneously more than 20% of the CPU. A ran an antivirus and malwarebytes and there is nothing to find.

  Any suggestions on what this could be and how I could continue on resolving this? Thank you!

  Hi Muvinda,

  To me that sounds like that run many background programs and therefore 100% CPU usage. So it s not a bug because many programs require a lot of CPU performance.

  So please check again the Task Manager. I mean if the CPU runs at 100% use a program in the task manager should cause this and in the Task Manager you can find all programs running in the background.

  Also it s recommended using a registry cleaner like CCleaner or similar. It can remove old registry keys and other stuff of old, useless.

  Check this box!

• Clocked at 100% and more

  Since I've upgraded to Firefox 7.0 in the last month, my CPU has worked 100% or more works. I turned all my extensions (Adblock Plus, NoScript, Flashblock, Ghostery, Leechblock, WOT), and it always does at random. It gets to the point where my CPU turns incredibly hot, and I started to force the software to close it before he can get too overheated.

  Any help or idea would be greatly appreciated!

  Your Flash plugin is a little older. You need to update.

  Adobe Flash Player 10.3.183.7 (2.94 MB)

  • http://get.Adobe.com/flashplayer/

  Update all of your Firefox Plugins

  • https://www-trunk.stage.Mozilla.com/en-us/pluginCheck/
  • http://www.Mozilla.com/en-us/pluginCheck/

  During the installation of the Plugins download files hotfix, remove the check mark to download any other software options with your Plugins (for example, toolbars, McAfee, Google Chrome, etc.)

  Clear the Cache and Cookies

  • https://support.Mozilla.com/en-us/KB/template:clearCookiesCache

  Clear the Cache of the network

  • https://support.Mozilla.com/en-us/KB/how%20To%20clear%20The%20Cache#w_clear-the-cache

  Check and tell if its working.

• Qosmio G20 sometimes closes down when clocked at 100%

  My G20 for apparently no reason to occasionally stops by itself which may be due to not having fans is not enough air, but I fear that when I run some programs the processor works 100% and this causes finally the computer overheats and stops. I run Registry and patrol when I run a scan it immediately shoots up to 100%.

  Is this a problem with my CPU?

  Furthermore why did the defragmentation with XP media do not completely defrag and chunks of fragmented data sheets?

  Any help on this is much appreciated.

  Hello

  Have you checked the processes that are running in the context of the operating system?
  If this isn't the case, then do it! In the Task Manager, you can see the process and which applications have pointed out the CPU.
  But it s not unusual that the CPU will run with maximum performance when certain applications and programs have been launched.
  However, I think as a new OS installed could stress CPU

  In addition, you can check the Toshiba saving settings and set the CPU, the speed of processing and method at different levels of cooling.

  Also check the fans and cooling modules and if necessary try to clean with the vacuum cleaner.

  I found an interesting paper on the problems of defragmentation:
  http://support.toshiba-tro.de/KB0/TSB6B01MF000FR01.htm

• clocked at 100% to freeze ups system is be can anyone help

  my processor works 100% for a few days, can someone help me solve the problem

  Hello

  1. you remember to make changes to your computer, after which the issue started?
  2. the application or service is causing the excessive use?
  3. have you looked in the Task Manager to check what processes or service is causing the excessive use?

  Follow these steps and check if the problem persists.

  Step 1:

  You may be able to get clues with what is happening by using the Task Manager and maybe understand.

  You will always figure out what happens if you use Process Explorer.

  Download Process Explorer, so you can see what is 'really' running on your system.

  Download Process Explorer from here:

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/Sysinternals/bb896653.aspx

  Step 2:

  Malicious software can disguise itself also seems to be a legitimate process of XP or he could hide under/behind other processes that you see running in Task Manager if you can't see the execution. I recommend that you use the Microsoft Safety Scanner to remove malware from your computer as appropriate.

  Note: You may lose data while eliminating malware from your computer.

• Activation of the NAC HA puts several hosts and ASA with processor clocked at 100%

  I installed a NAC Manager and a NAC server in OOB without any problems, but when I configured the AP (high availability) with another server, my ASA and several guests in my network started work ant 100% of the cpu.

  I tried to configure each interface of the NAC on a single DMZ and the problem stops there.

  -That someone had this problem (NAC version 4.7)

  TKX

  Miguel Amaral

  Hello Miguel.

  When I started a NAC InBand HA solution I had a similar problem that I solved the heart rate HA configuration to use ETH0 just instead use ETH0 and ETH1.

  Best regards

  Luciano Carvalho

• Clocks FPGA

  My specs are:

  -Chasis SMU-1082

  -FlexRIO SMU-7962R

  -MRF custom calendar card

  The MRF pushes its clock to the PXI_CLK10_IN with own clock at 10 MHz.

  I use several SCTL to Council FlexRIO with multiple clock sources. Availiable clock sources are (also see attachment):

  -40 MHz on-board clock

  -PXI CLK10

  -Clock 100 MHz

  -Clock 200 MHz

  -Clock DStarA

  I can't get my hands on the information what are the sources of clock of 100 MHz and 200 MHz clocks. Who are special oscillators to the Board of Directors? Are the clocks 40 MHz clock PLL - ed or the PXI CLK10 PLL - ed?

  After some additional searching on Google, I got my answer: http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/372614J-01/target5devicehelp/pxie_base_clocks/

• USB8452 - how to set a clock of 20 MHz SPI Stream mode?

  Hi all
  I can't really manage set a clock of 20 MHz SPI Stream mode.

  To set how often I use this property node (see image)
  [for example to set a 1 MHz clock, I put:]

  1. Wave1.TMNG.SclkLow = 50 (500ns)
  2. Wave1.TMNG.SclkHigh = 50 (500ns)]

  And everything works fine.

  When I try to put a clock of 20 MHz instead, I put:

  1. Wave1.TMNG.SclkLow = 2.5 (25ns)
  2. Wave1.TMNG.SclkHigh = 2.5 (25ns)

  But, unfortunately, I receive a 25 MHz clock.
  I know the USB 8452 can generate a 20 MHz signal, so I think I'm doing something wrong, but honestly, I don't know what to do.
  I see that the entry for Wave1.Tmng.SclkLow/High is a U32, then perhaps it truncates my 2.5 to 2 (i.e. a 25 MHz clock), but given that the USB8452 can generate a 20 MHz signal I honestly don't see the point of this.

  Thanks for the advice/help,
  Federico

  

  Hi Federico,.

  as you can see in the image below, the number that you set is the number of clock cycle of BASIC that make SPI clock.

  Base clock is 100 MHz, then the single 10ns resolution. You have to choose between 20 and 30ns or try to have 20ns high clock and 30ns low clock.

  Teo.

• Drift & precision clock 6323 PCIe

  Is anyone know the temperature or time to derive values for the clock of 100 MHz on the NOR-6323 PCIe card?  The specification document only lists such as 50 PPM accuracy.

  Unfortunately, the information you request is not available. Typically, builders oscillator provide stability of frequency as a range specifications (max and min values for example ±20ppm) and not the dependence of precision against temperature (for example a table of temperature vs frequency stability).

• Is it possible to use the internal clock for meter tasks in the buffer?

  Hello

  Hardware: USB term mass 6251

  Software: LabView 2011 SP1

  I need to measure the angular lever position and speed of a carpet. For that I use two quadrature encoders. To accurately calculate the speed I use buffered from the measures of position using one of the available onboard counters. I understand that for this technique, I provide a sample for the meter clock. I wonder if it is possible to use the internal time base. Note that both of my counters are used so I can't generate a signal to clock with them.

  I found two conflicting pages related to my problem:

  1) http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/EA7FFFEAFC3E1D85862572F700699530

  2) http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/775290A3121D1FFC862577140074D3B3

  The first says that I can use the internal clock of 100 kHz, and the other says that I have an external clock.

  Comments/solutions?

  Javad

  Hi Javad,

  On your specific device, there is not a direct route from the time base of 100 kHz for the meter (according to the routing table of MAX):

  

  Yellow cell indicates that a route is possible but there is not direct (the "gate" terminal is used as sample clock for counters of the M series).  Mouse on the cell reveals yellow that make this route really requires the use of a counter (so it is not suitable for your application).

  On the line above "100kHzTimebase" you will notice it is called 'FrequencyOutput', which does not have a direct route to the door.  This would be the way to go if you want to route 100 kHz (or some other frequency) as your sample counter clock - you can set it up the same way to a standard meter output task:

  

  The output frequency doesn't have that many features like a meter output, but it is able to generate a continuous stable frequency.  There are only 32 different frequencies that can be generated using Freq Out on the 6251:

  {10 MHz, 100 kHz} / {01:16}

  Do not forget that the resolution of your measure of frequency by using this method will be equal to how many times you update the measure (hopefully, that makes sense).  In other words, if at the end of all the 1 second, you take the total number of charges since the last second, you would have a 1 per second equal resolution change in the number.  If you take the difference twice per second, you would end up with half the resolution.  You will be sampling the account register fairly quickly, but you will need only to do the calculation of the frequency after that all N samples in order to obtain a significant number.

  Another method that will certainly give a higher resolution in less time at typical speeds of coders is to set up a measurement of the frequency (the counter will count the internal 80 MHz base time period your external signal and the pilot calculates the frequency based on the result).  This method uses only a single entry - so you can just feed the 'A' your encoder quadrature signal (the method will not work if you are interested in absolute position or direction).  Without using signals A and B together, you will be susceptible to noise (which is common to have a quadrature encoder) that you want to delete (perhaps by setting up a digital filter).  Finally, you want to set a reasonable timeout on your reader calls (which will be blocked until a period of your external signal occurs), and the error-200284 handle simply report "0Hz" to make sure that your program is still sensitive even without an external signal present.

  Best regards

• CPU intermittently pegs at 100% for 30-60 minutes.

  First of all, I would like to say that I am more tech-savvy, but after 4 months trying to resolve the issue on my own I gave.

  My problem is that 2 - 3 times a day, for between 30 to 60 minutes, the processor in my machine just ramps up to 100% (see: http://imgur.com/MwCyq) and will sit with all 4 cores clocked at 100% for the better part of an hour before returning to normal. This occurs even when the machine is idling without running programs and he returns quickly if the machine is restarted during one of these "unique". I have scanned for viruses (including safe mode), hundreds of times using updated versions of Symantec, Malwarebytes Anti-Malware and Spybot S & D without success that leads me to the idea that it is a discount Virus. Furthermore, I have flashed to the latest BIOS version and I also determined by the test pilot is not a problem with the GPU. I did a clean install of Windows 2 weeks that has not solved the problem and hardware diagnostics indicate any physical problems with the machine.
  My system specs are as follows:
  HP Elitebook 8540w
  Win 7 Professional
  i5 M520 @ 2.4 GHz
  BIOS - current
  RAM - 4 GB
  NVIDIA 880M
  I worked with one of my friends who are professional IT on it and everything we tried (described above) has failed. This question has been persistent since just after Christmas 2010 and my immense patience begins to wear a thin. I searched everywhere on the net for an answer to this problem which seems to have a lot of people, but there is no consensus on what the cause of it is and all the solutions that other issues have not worked for me. So I appeal to the vast knowledge of the community of Windows answers to see if they can shed some light on the question.
  Thank you.

  Do a "clean boot" - how to solve a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135
  (The steps # 1 a, 1 b, 1 c, 1 d and 1e)

  Perform a clean boot to determine if background programs interfere with your game or program
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/331796

  J W Stuart: http://www.pagestart.com

• Model hp desktop a622n... updated for Windows 7 video graphics card

  I have a hp a622n office that has a motherboard Micro Star International.

  The serial number of the motherboard is 4311483428... bus clock mghz 100... Award BIOS software 3 26 05/09/2005

  My screen is a Samsung SyncMaster s/n GS19H9NX601526

  Intel 82845 G/GL/GE/PE/GV Graphics Controller

  It came with Windows Xp and I did a clean install of Windows 7

  I am able to use the monitor but... trying to activate standby or sleep mode setting screen... I get a message that I need a graphics card that supports 3D...

  Through my research I found that a Radeon X 1300 card #400558 - 001that is supposed to solve this problem...

  I was told that I need a PCI...

  I find this advice to VisionTek... their customer service told me to make sure the motherboard is working with this...

  This card will work?  and are there other boards out there that would work too?

  Thank you...

  Lets start over which is an antique with limited options because he has only PCI slots and not normal video card.  He has the card, you ask about "high definition 3D Performance & quality of the Image on your PC" If you plan to get one, try the EBay marketplace because it's really old hardware and you can get one for almost nothing.  For example: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Visiontek-Radeon-X1300-Graphics-Card-256MB-128bit-900106-/191175474229

  Just make sure one ordered is the PCI version.

  There are other possible choices: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187213

• Timestamp of photon arrival times

  I would like to make a measure of cross-correlation of two photons.  Auto hardware correlators and crossed correlators are available, but expensive.  It seems that many other users resulted in the idea of using the 80 or clocks 100 MHz in the counter of entry for each desired channel, starting the counters at the same time and get every channel of photons in the door of the corresponding counter.  Each photon triggers so the meter to store the total of the clock in its internal register, that is, the time stamp for this photon. Since then carries on a 32-bit counter clocked at 100 MHz only occur every 42 seconds, and average rate of photons will be at least 100 Hz, excesses should be easily recognized and corrected in post processing.  So assume that all we have to do is get meter reads in a buffer.  Bursts of photons with separations of arrival can be as small as few clock cycles.  Average rates may be a few hundred kHz or more on each channel.  We can adjust this rate by turning the power of the laser to the top or to the bottom - the source for the broadcaster that produces the stream of correlated photons.  I suspect many others would like to know which system is better for these types of measures, the 6602 or the X-Series.  If FPGA is a good solution, perhaps we should start a new thread about it.  But for 6602 or X-Series: what is the fastest, it can do so for short bursts (speed for how long) and what is the sustainable rate?  I realize that the sustained rate will depend on the material.  I thought I only saw that the PXI beats the PCI bus in this type of application.  PXI versions are better?  In particular, what are the effects of the FIFO 128 sample on the X-Series compared to the 2 on 6602 buffer solution.  And I noticed something about the speed of the front end for these two choices could be a problem in this regard.  Pulses (photon) TTL on the door will have a width of 10 to 50 nsec.

  For the flow of the series X is going to be much faster than the 6602 mainly due to the FIFO aboard (but PCIe gives more throughput than PCI).  PCI or PXI should have the same flow (and PCIe vs SMU would also have the same flow).

  Forum user (and NOT used) Andrew S displayed some X series streaming of references here.  On a single meter, it was able to maintain the sampling frequency of ~ 20 MHz on PCIe X Series and ~ 8 MHz on USB of the X series.  6602 benchmarks are much lower, somewhere between 200 and 300 kHz (although the system used for benchmarks is old enough).

  The 6602 allows shorter pulses that the X series.  The specifications page indicates a minimum of 6.25 the 6602 ns pulse width.  I saw a specified number directly to the X series in fact.  X series devices include a maximum external base of 25 MHz clock frequency, which assuming duty cycle 50% would be 20 ns high and low times.  50 nsec would certainly long enough of a pulse, but 10 ns * could * be pushing.  You will probably need to do some tests to confirm or not the X series is able to detect all the impulses for your configuration - if not then I would suggest the X series (PCIe-6320 is the lowest cost one) on the 6602.

  Best regards

• Synchronization of data from different sample of data acquisition rate

  I use a high RT 8135.  I'm sampling of signals from analog pressure thermocouples to 20 ms and 10 ms.  I use the stream network to transfer the data from the SMU on my host.  I would like to be able to synchronize the timestamps of all data to the 1ms sampling note and record in a file.

  Search in the file my sampling data 10ms end timestamp does not match the timestamp of 20ms, missing data... I know you have empty queues to get the rest data but is possible to interpolate any data to adapt a unique timestamp?

  Thank you!

  Hi aokada09,

  Looks like you are facing problems resulting from parallel execution two loops you have.  There is nothing necessarily bind the two loops together, so that each of them an iteration at the rates you specified, but are allowed to start each software (sort of random) dictates that they start.

  To get a solid synchronization, share a sample between the two measures clock, but run the sample clock at 100 Hz for 50 Hz for thermocouple measurement and pressure measurement.  You should be able to use shared inside the SMU chassis backplane clock.  This will be as close as possible to synchronize without using a card of timing.  The only real source of delay/tilt between readings at this point is the physical distance that must travel the clock signal. This will not lead to steep, but there will certainly be some (probably on the scale of the high-nanoseconds or microseconds bass).  This article gives more information about the synchronization and the sample clock:

  http://www.NI.com/white-paper/11369/en/

• Problem with multitasking, Amnesty International and: error-89137

  I have a PXI system with two modules in the series X-series SMU-6345. I need to create a task HAVE meter sampling, to acquire the data of channels in these two modules, that works very well. My application requires then to create a task and task object some time later, during execution of the task to HAVE it. But I'm getting following error:

  Error-89137 occurred at Test_DO_Write chn.vi

  Possible reasons:

  Specified route can not be satisfied, because it requires resources that are currently in use by another route.

  Property: RefClk.Src
  Source device: PXI1Slot2
  Terminal source: no

  Resources in use by
  Task name: _unnamedTask<53>
  Source device: PXI1Slot2
  Terminal of source: PXIe_Clk100
  Target unit: PXI1Slot2
  Destination terminal: RefClockInternal

  Task name: _unnamedTask<51>

  (unnamedTask<51> 's task and HAVE _unnamedTask<53> is in the post above)

  I get this error when I try to create a new task to DO or a counter in the same module 6345, during an acquisition of GOT underway. It seems that the task tries to access the line of Int.Ref.Clock, a 100 MHZ clock is already for the task to HAVE it. I tried to assign this clock of 100 MHZ, as clock Ref. for the task of MAKING, using hardware node. But it returns error saying "not supported; harware.

  I enclose a VI to explain this problem.

  The DIF has been resolved. "By defining the PXI 100 MHZ clock bottom of basket (PXIe_Clk100) as the reference clock for both HAVE and PERFORM tasks, the use of property nodes DAQmx Timing 'ReferenceClock.Source' and ReferenceClock.Rate ', things are working properly.