Color space for exported mattes

Similar Questions

• What is the best color space for workflow photo where the goal is marketing and selling prints?

  What is the best color space for workflow photo where the goal is marketing and selling prints?

  The really important thing here is not work in the color space. The important thing is that you set up your calibration targets so they correspond to the document that you are printing on. This means that the white monitor should be a Visual match white paper and black monitor a match to the density of the ink max for the paper.

  But to answer the question - assuming that you print on an inkjet printer, Adobe RGB should cover most of what the printer can reproduce on a glossy paper of good quality. If you have or get a range wide screen you will also be able to see the range of the file to the screen and you can then test your profile to print with confidence that "what you see is what you get".

  Some will say that good inkjet reproduce some colors that are in fact outside the Adobe RGB, and so you have to work in ProPhoto. While technically true, this superior to Adobe RGB color range is very small and very limited and IMO a fairly minor concern.

• Is LAB 'native color space' for ID?

  Is it correct to say that the LAB is the 'native color space' for InDesign? Only colors specified in RGB that must be translated to CMYK will by LAB along the way and vice versa?

  No, the LABORATORY isn't the color space native to InDesign. InDesign does not have a space colorimetric native .

  However, all colors between color space conversions happens by ACE, the Adobe color engine, a component of the core of Adobe technology, using techniques of ICC color management. All conversions between color spaces are made first to a colorspace connection , then the color space target. The LAB is pretty well what is this color space of connection.

  -Dov

• Change how ACR interprets color space for raw images

  When you browse the raw (CR2) photos with the OS X finder, I love the way color is represented, it corresponds very closely to the camera in preview. However, Bridge/ACR/Lr all interpret the color space of files differently good raw, and I wonder if there is a way to put these programs according how OS X finder restores raw images.

  Color space isn't the issue.  I think what you see with OS X finder is the embedded jpg file has been generated by the camera and saved in the RAW file for viewing, and it should look identical to the jpg of the camera.  The adobes in Camera RAW and Lightroom RAW converter uses the Adobe Standard profile of the camera as the default profile to the camera to generate an RGB from the RAW data image and you can save the image as a jpg, tif, etc. with any colorspace you select (sRGB, ProPhoto RGB, etc.).

  Adobe has generated camera profiles for Canon, Nikon and a few other cameras that are a good match for the profiles used by the camera to generate an RGB image.  You will find them on the camera Calibration tab (as suggested in the post above) and they have names like camera XXXXX, XXXXX is the same name as that used in the camera.  Select one with the same name XXXXX that you selected in the camera and you should get a much better game.  You can also change the default profile to the camera at one of them, as suggested in the post above, and then the RAW image will open the first time using this profile instead of the Adobe Standard profile.  If you always use the same profile in the camera, this will solve your problem.  If you use different profiles of the camera in the camera photo then you will need to manually change in Camera RAW and Lightroom to one corresponding used in the camera because the RAW converter does not read what profile you selected in the camera.

• LR - PS for color space

  Hello

  I used PS4 and bridge for years. Now I've finally moved PS and LR CC. So again to know how everything works. I met a few questions on the color space.  I capture in raw and I have existing files in PS4 in the color space sRGB IEC61966 - 2.1 8-bit (I realized just now that's worse for printing color space) I understand that Adobe Prophoto is a such color space big monitors will not be able to show all the information which means that there is a gap between the screen and printed. Given that I'm large format prints problably it is better to use Adobe RGB 16 bit depth.

  
  

  I learned that RAW files will not have a color space so I don't need to choose or worry about them and also that LR works in a color space called Meilssa/Prophoto RGB.

  Now, I received the following question:

  What will happen with the color space for my existing jpg and psd, tiff girls I have in PS4 in sRGB IEC61966 - 2.1 once I then added in LR? Will be it be converted to Prophoto RGB since it's the working color space of LR? If this isn't the case, it will remain in the original color space. I would like to have these files to stay in space orginal color and depth. Because I don't want to run the risk of losing information by conversion of color spaces.

  
  

  Hope someone can help me with this. And correct me if some of my results are not correct.

  
  

  Thanks a lot ,

  Hazel

  
  

  Your sRGB files will be fine - they will not visually change and will not somehow by LR ProPhoto, workspace.

  LR assigns a profile when you export and then choose sRGB on export of these files.

• PIXMA Pro 100 color space issues

  Hello

  I have a few questions related to printing from lightroom, I'm new on this bare with me.

  (1) I have a canon 7 d I shoot in Raw 12-14 bit? and most of my treatment is done in lightroom, so no need to export to photoshop, however if I would be this export as 16-bit tiff or Jpeg? So, if I had to after post-processing in photoshop then back in lightroom, this would allow only me to print in tiff or jpeg format is correct as a psd/jpeg file?

  (2) given that I only edit in lightroom I can print directly in Raw CR2 format 12-14 bit using canon plugin pro printing studio? or is it exported to the translator as a 16-bit file? and then use the ICC profile that is (canon paper) for best results paper mill, I lose a quality of colour printing by printing from Raw 12-14 bits instead of 16-bit tiff/jpeg.

  (3) using the profiles of ICC paper mill, the original raw will deposit 12-14 bit sRGB 7Dcamera be translated to the printer default Lightroom or is the color space is not necessary because I have not converted to 16-bit in post processing?

  (3) I did not have my calibrated monitor yet but intend to do so in the future, but until then I'm not messing around with pro, photoRGB Pro or Adobe RGB or sRGB mode.

  (4) if I use lightrooms canon pro printing studio Player is the color space translated automatically the settings of my camera or do I have to activate it in lightroom first?.

  (5) I use a Mac running yosemite 10.10 and to learn more about ICC profiles where the factory ICC profiles download how and where to store can you recommend a joint Web site to learn how to do this on a mac?

  (6) as you can see I want to just print the best images from the camera to the printer without much science involved but I'm willing to learn, but get confused with the post-production of workspace different menu software for best results, that I'd do it prosume until I get my proffesionally calibrated monitor would print from Raw with the factory ICC profiles?

  7) color space and calibration of the parameters are all about what you have on the print screen or it is mainly for the depth of extra color to print?

  I can calibrate my monitor on adobe RGB and have my camera shoot on adobe RGB-calibration with the software, but said I need correct color surveillance devices? If I were to do this and still just used paper ICC profiles the footprints would be better?

  My first impressions were excellent, very similar to what I see on the screen in all cases but I checked the lightrooms settings and these are on Pro photo RGB for external editing and it of color space for printing pluggin also studio, or is it just native Raw sRGB if I change the settings it says I'll lose the color space maxium potential.

  Sorry for the influx of questions :-)

  Thomas

  Hahnemühle has an excellent explanation on downloading and adding profiles for PC and Mac

  http://www.Hahnemuehle.com/en/digital-FineArt/ICC-profiles/installing-profiles.html

  Print Studio Pro is rather obscure on the use of profiles than those installed, but it's pretty simple.

  In the area of setting printer settings choosing fine arts I or II (I used one and it seems to work)

  Then in the color management box, use the pull down to find the right profile added.

  (I posted this before, but the post was deleted for some unknown reason)

  

• Yellow colors appear dull export, drives me crazy, need help

  When I export a photo from lightroom in JPEG with sRGB color space, I see huge differences mainly yellow colours.

  The photo of sRGB washed yellow which is a huge difference to the development version.

  I have a very basic knowledge of color management and Lightroom and understand the theory of color spaces and that he will always be differences in color because of the conversion from Lightroom (Prophoto with tonecurve of sRGB) in sRGB.

  But what I don't understand is that my yellow in color space sRGB exported look much more washed out and ugly so similair pictures I find on the net. (which are also in the sRGB color space)

  For example, the image below, which includes rich yellow colors in my browser (Firefox4):

  - http://www.Flickr.com/photos/mrsmagic/379546943/sizes/l/in/photostream/

  - http://www.Flickr.com/photos/druclimb/459126182/sizes/z/in/photostream/

  If I compare to my image exported (with saturated colors high in lightroom), I see a huge difference in the yellow color:

  - http://Tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2hfooc4 & s = 7

  What is confusing to me, is that when I open the Flickr images locally in Photosop I see that the yellow GET washed, there, as well (probably because that the PS is color management).

  So I thought that maybe it's the webbrowser (Firefox 4) that incorrectly displays the photos, but then again, why not my photos look so washed out in Firefox4 and other flickr sRGB photos, they also have an sRGB profile... (Firefox4 should be color management).

  In any case I can reproduce these solid yellow colours using Lightroom to export. (IN Lightroom, it seems very well)

  -My screen is calibrated using a spyder3 pro colour. (I do not have a range wide lcd)

  -J' using Lightroom 3.3 for editing and using full export of RAW to JPEG color space sRGB.

  Fands,

  I wouldn't start compared to other photos on flickr with yours, but comparing the view to develop it in LR with sRGB off LR export.

  Issues related to the:

  Compared with the view to develop in LR

  • What looks like a JPEG look exported in Photoshop?
  • What looks like a JPEG look exported in Firefox 4?
  • How an exported JPEG looks in LR, after you import it?

  If they all look the same (more or less) the same, there is no problem with your JPEG export.

  The two images from flickr, you are referring to DOES NOT include any color or same profile tag. So depending on how Firefox 4 manages photos not marked, you might just be looking at their using your profile display or something else (I don't have Firefox 4 installed to discover, in Firefox 3, there are gfx.color_management.display_profile to be specified). In addition, be aware that Firefox 4 (AFAIK) is beta, so bugs should not be ruled out.

  Gossweiler beat

  Switzerland

• Flickr publish Service color space

  I read a few discussions on the definition of the color space when exporting, including this thread:

  http://forums.Adobe.com/message/2942130#2942130

  For many years, I used Photoshop Elements as my main editing software. The images that I edited in PSE and then transferred on Flickr using Flickr Uploadr all show sRGB color space when I look at the EXIF on Flickr.

  Since I started using LR 3, I noticed that images published on Flickr of the LR Flickr publish service does not display any color space when I look at the EXIF in Flickr. I see nothing in the Flickr publish settings service that allows me to incorporate a color space.

  What color space are the images published in? Am I missing a step somewhere in LR?

  I was wondering the same thing - why I couldn't set the colorspace when I published on flickr.  So I posted a photo and then downloaded from flickr in photoshop who told me that it is srgb.  It makes sense because a jpg should be srgb, so I guess they wanted her to be safe for idiots.

• Choose a color space in LR CC

  There was once an option to choose/set color in Lightroom with the choice of ProRGB, Adobe RGB, sRGB space as there are PS/Bridge. As I have used Adobe RGB as baseline - camera photo/computer and lab - it's a serious problem, given the develop module in LR using Pro RGB, which does not translate to Photoshop at all without color changes.

  And given that there is no parameter to define a color space "for the moment" by the remarks on the LR FAQ, is there a time for when this critical element will be available?

  Common questions asked about color in Lightroom CC

  pjoye wrote:

  I have white balance adjustments in the LR library and fine tuned develop them. I refined with a cool filter in PS, but when I saw their new in LR, they do not have the same appearance.

  That could happen if you have a preset in the import or the auto tone in Lightroom.

  Other than that, any difference between Lightroom and Photoshop indicates a broken monitor profile.

  ProPhotoRGB has nothing to do with it. You are looking in the wrong place.

• Hello! I am a family oriented photographer and have a bit of trouble to keep the colors of files exported between lightroom and photoshop consistent. I edited my images on 5 Lightroom and export TIFF files after ProPhoto color space

  Hello! I am a family oriented photographer and have a bit of trouble to keep the colors of files exported between lightroom and photoshop consistent. I edited my images on 5 Lightroom and export TIFF files after changing color ProPhoto RGB space. Then, I opened a picture at once and changed the settings of Photoshop CC ProPhoto RGB color (under the workspace). When I was editing on photoshop, I tried to export the image, but the colors seemed different, a bit washed out and blue, from the color of the workspace, I was on. I don't know how to solve this problem. Please notify.

  Thank you very much for this! Color sorted

• For the printing of P.O.D.: how to set the Adobe RGB color space

  Hello and thank you in advance,

  (I use InDesign CS 5.5 on a Mac).

  I need set the appropriate PDF export settings

  To print a book on demand, with color drawings inside on the text pages.

  The instructions in Mandarin that I could find, say this:

  'Submit your graphics in color space Adobe RGB, integrated withprofile.'

  The big Question: how should I do that?

  I know enough to start with

  File-> Adobe PDF Presets-> print quality

  Then I click on the Menu 'output '.

  and this is where I start to get lost.

  for

  Color conversion...

  I think I should choose "convert to the Destination.

  for

  Destination

  I think it should be "Adobe RGB (1998).

  Now to incorporate this profile.

  What should I choose in virtue:

  Profile Inclusion policy?

  And is there anything else I should do to get these inside good printing color images?

  Thanks again,

  IthacaAuthor (aka ZorbaTheGeek, but the forum wouldn't let me connect with my old screen name)

  Virtually all digital printing is done via PostScript or PDF. In the first case, the PDF file is converted to use viat PostScript to Acrobat and in the latter case, the PDF file is sent directly to the digital printer.

  In both cases, CMYK is actually the real destination color space. There is no true RGB printer! What is true is that non-PostScript / non PDF (laser printers generally low range and inkjet printers as well as specialized sublimation photo printers inkjet and dye) take RGB via drivers and that convert to CMYK, but I don't think that's what you deal with.

  Our recommendation to Adobe for best printing results, whether for offset or digital, is to export PDF into PDF/X-4 with no color conversion using the default color CMYK (CMYK SWOP) space or if the contrary view of your print service provider, among other CMYK color spaces provided by Adobe or the print service provider themselves. FWIW, more peripheral to digital print on demand, have settings to fully emulate the SWOP CMYK printing requirements. The use of PDF/X-4 in this way allows the existing color in your document InDesign is properly tag in the output PDF file and converted to CMYK RIP the device level digital printing.

  (It may also help us if you can provide a pointer to the explicit instructions provided by your print service provider.)

  -Dov

• Color space RGB in LR3 - it converts to sRGB export?

  First of all, I only got LR3 for two days so I'm a complete novice. I have read my book and just found out the part about the RGB color space. I shoot with and use sRGB, which apparently LR is recognized. However, it states that the development module using Lightroom RGB. My question is, when I export my photos modified to PSE8 (or in a folder on my desktop to record and send an e-mail to my daughter), he exports their return as sRGB? I know there is a lot of controversy over the whole thing of RGB, but after my research on the topic, I decided that sRGB is the best for my particular situation. I'm just that I don't have to check something or convert them if they do not automatically change out of LightroomRGB.

  You can define it in the export dialog box.

• An error occurred during the execution of the request for export: could not allocate space for object ' dbo. DS_Property_Member_Array'. 'IdxPropMbrArr04' to database 'EPMA' because the 'PRIMARY' filegroup is full.

  Cannot deploy the planning application. I get the following message.

  Detail: An error has occurred during execution of the export demand: could not allocate space for object ' dbo. DS_Property_Member_Array'. 'IdxPropMbrArr04' to database 'EPMA' because the 'PRIMARY' filegroup is full. Create disk space by deleting unnecessary files, removing objects in the filegroup, adding additional files to the filegroup, or setting autogrowth on it to the existing files in the file group.

  No idea where I need to check the space I checked my essbase server and workspace and they both seem to have enough space for a normal deployment.

  It's a question on the SQL Server database with the allocation of space, searching the Internet for something like "Create disk space by deleting unnecessary files, removing objects in the filegroup" and you should get a lot of results.

  For example - the primary filegroup is full SQL Server 2008 - database to stack Exchange administrators

  See you soon

  John

• My color, setting for LR and PS is ProPhoto RGB. If I want to export my photos and place them on OneDrive or watch on TV of the photo, can I change the color setting in sRGB?

  My color, setting for LR and PS is ProPhoto RGB. If I want to export my photos and place them on OneDrive or watch on TV of the photo, can I change the color setting in sRGB?

  In general, I would recommend sRGB, if images must be consulted on the screens of TV or PC monitors. sRGB is usually the universal profile for sharing photos on the web. If you want to share your images on a single disc, most of the people will see their best, without changes in color, with an sRGB profile.

  So it really depends on your goal. You use a player for sharing and viewing on backup and storage devices.

• Color space removed when exporting with the "copyright and Contact Details Only"

  Hello

  When looking at why my JPGs looked more saturated in IE11 I finally discovered that besides all the metadata when you export, delete the tag of color space causing the major problems of color in IE11 and probably other browsers. I think it's a serious problem in the program and must be addressed. I use LR 5.6

  Sorry everyone. I just tested again and I put a good idea 2 and 2 together to come up with the wrong answer