Conclusion

Similar Questions

• I can't get into my yahoo favorites. I spent time with AT & T and the conclusion, they have come to is that it can be a problem with Firefox and yahoo. Help please

  I use a laptop computer HP NOT mobile. Whenever I try to go into my favorites YAHOO that it asks me to sign in which I'm doing nothing does not. AT & T came to the conclusion that maybe it's that Firefox and Yahoo do not work together. I just downloaded the latest versions of Firefox and toolbar yahoo again without success. Is there something with Firefox that prevents me to enter my yahoo Favorites?

  You have the box checked for automatic private browsing mode? In this case, when you open the Options dialog box, the drop-down list usually said "conservation rules: don't remember history. In this mode, Firefox does not retain your Yahoo cookie between sessions, which would explain the problem.

  Note: If you uncheck this box and start in normal mode, you can still create private windows via the menu or with Ctrl + Shift + p.

  If the problem is not caused by a parameter of Firefox, it is possible that an add-on or software external is clear your cookies between sessions.

• The conclusion for M - Audio MobilePre USB driver problem

  The conclusion for M - Audio MobilePre USB driver problem

  Use: iMac

  OS: El Capitan 1011.2

  The latest driver I could find was 1.8.1.

  Error message:

  Installation failed - Setup could not install the software because there was no

  available software

  I would use this hardware with Final Cut ProX 10.2.2 and Garageband 10.1.0.1

  A quick search seems to indicate the latest version of the driver to be 1.2.1 - there was no 1.8.1 I could find. It has been out for more than a year, so no mention of El Capitan, but it could work. I'll make sure that you have the right to download and try again.

• Scan Tenable conclusion critical against WSUS Windows Internal Database on Server 2008 R2

  I get weekly analyses of customer who uses a valid scanner (Nessus) and conclusion this week included a conclusion CRITICAL against Windows Internal Database of the WSUS that is installed on a 2008 R2 Datacenter server.  The conclusion is the following:

  "Output Plugin:

  Unsupported following Microsoft SQL Server installations have been
  discovered:

  Version installed: 9.00.5000.00 (2005 SP4 (2463332 KB)) database internal Windows (64-bit)
  Minimum supported version: this version is no longer supported. »

  Yet, when I get an update I can find version the most recent is the one currently installed.  This version of Windows Internal Database reached its end of LIFE?  If so, when will Microsoft release an update for the Windows Internal Database, which can be applied to the server?

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum
  
  
  If you give us a link to the new thread we can point to some resources it

• Conclusions on the (empty) replacement? Ink cartridges for OfficeJet 8600 N911g

  I would like to note some interesting conclusions on the replacement of "Setup cartridges.

  The printer has reported that the black ink was out and needed replacement.  It really has not reported the CMY cartridges also outside, even if they were low.  Oddly however, the printer continued printing in any case, even if the text was black.

  When I replaced it with the full k cartridge, suddenly C cartridges and there were empty!  The M cartridge gave a level showing approximately a 1/8th.

  So I removed the full k cartridge and handed in the (almost emplty?) 'installation type' K cartridge: there was still a bit of reading level K, but now all the cartridges C, M and there were empty!  What was going on?  Nothing in the M cartridge has been used, and all of a sudden it was empty?

  Okay, okay.  I accept the high probability that when a cartridge is empty, all others probably get nearly empty too.  I won't have to be wary as a great many people that the printer has the ability to detect a cartridge Exchange (from vacuum full for) and therefore on the alert to create a user change as the rest of the cartridges, regardless of the level of ink.  It is probably the case that all cartridges must be turned on outside.

  However, these experiments show that the ink level detection technology has a worse quality than the ability of the first Kia or Hyundai models at different levels of meaning fuel in the tank.  How long have you been at the forefront of the HP inkjet technology?  Decades now?  And you're telling me that a magenta cartridge that was not detected in the vacuum cartridges K switched again (full) to the old (almost empty) again (full) back again, and now all color cartridges are felt as empty?

  I'm glad that I'm not a suspicious person, HP, or I might be inclined to believe that something funny is going on.

  There are a few other (unofficial?) HP support forum and I read dozens of messages from OJ8600 (N911g) owners, saying that he would be their last HP product.  I hope that I have misunderstood them.  After all, I'm not a suspect.

  There is a boot process when a new cartridge is installed to remove the air from the print head.  He began all colors and blacks whenever a cartridge is changed.  If a cartridge is almost empty and a different cartridge is replaced the boot may cause this cartridge should now appear as low.

  I suggest running the printer until it refuses to print as a cartridge becomes really empty, then replace all of the cartridges that are both low.

  Initial depression on the ink indicator is defined before the cartridges actually run out of ink to give you time to buy a replacement. You have no need to replace the cartrdiges until they are actually exhausted.

• After that Windows 7 conclusion "No Internet access" in the wireless network?

  I have a USB wireless network card installed in my office. All judging by the "connected network" showed, that he manages to connect to my wireless router, with I can't visit all websites due to "free Internet access". Only if I move my router where (almost) no wall blocking the path between my office and the router, will be solved the problem.

  There is no problems surfing the Internet using my laptop (Windows XP) and the iPad, which also connect to the router.

  I don't know what "No Internet access" while "Connected network" appears. To understand this, perhaps I should know what Windows 7 draws the conclusion "No Internet access" to the wireless network.

  Thank you, everyone. I managed to figure out the problem last night. With this document that I found by Googling, http://www.usb.org/developers/whitepapers/327216.pdf, I tried to disconnect my DVD ROM USB plugged next to my wireless network card and found that this really WORKED, although the DVD ROM is USB 2.0 instead of 3.0.

  In addition, as Shawn "Cmdr" Keene [MVP] said, I really need to I ignore the message "connected network". I ran the Ipconfig/all command frequently and found that sometimes the IP address of my wireless network card was no longer * 192.168.0 and the gateway, and the IP addresses of the DNS servers are null, even if the message "Connected network" remained all the time.

  Hope this helps others who also have this problem, even though my English is not very good. : )

• Collapsed bridge camera of conclusion for the loading of pictures.

  Collapsed bridge camera of conclusion for the loading of pictures. Good connection.  Low pictures load in 'Photos' in my iMac, but not on the bridge on the same computer.

  Have been loading photos in my Mark III Bridge. It worked automatically in the past.  Now "no device is found" works very well for pictures in the PC and iMac

  If you use Bridge CC please updated for the latest version of the CC bridge, see Adobe Bridge does not some devices on Mac OS 10.11

  Kind regards

  Assani

• PS The CS6 (2012) and the tube to move it to a new Mac. I did a search on the web, but the information was not conclusive. I have to disable my current Mac before installing the new Mac? I still have the CD to install it. Thanks in advance for any help.

  I have PS CS6 (2012) and the wand to move it to a new Mac. I did a search on the web, but the information was not conclusive. I have to disable my current Mac before installing the new Mac? I still have the CD to install it. Thanks in advance for any help.

  You can install and activate up to 2 Macs for your own use. That would leave you with a spare part if something were to happen with your old Mac.

  However if you are going to get rid of, see help > deactivate, then also check the option to remove the serial number power the computer off.

  Then go to your folder CS6 use the Uninstall.app to properly remove Photoshop. Do not drag the folder to the trash.

  You can install fresh on your new Mac from your drive, turn and look for the updates.

  As a note: do not move or copy your old installation of Photoshop to a new Mac.

• Rule Table Bug - legends & Conclusions

  I'd be interested to know if anyone has come across this problem which seems to be a bug in the OPA?

  I have a rule that triggers a question during the interview where the value of the text attribute 'sense the question of procedure type' = 'Community Care' '.

  The value 'Community Care' appears as a conclusion under a caption in the table named 'issue sense of type' on a tab named 'Types of importance '.

  It is derived from condition procedure issue type 'code' which is an entrance to the OPA.

  On the statements tab, I have an attribute, 'community care test shall apply to the proceedings', which has the legend "community care".

  The legend 'community care' is displayed on a tab in the table of rules called 'Procedure '.

  The values for 'community care test shall apply to the proceedings' are derived from condition "the name of procedure" which is an entrance to the OPA.

  At the base of the rule the question test, I expected to appear did not appear. The reason seems to be that the rule table using the conclusions contained in the legend 'community care' in the tab 'Instance' rather than the conclusions contained in the legend 'type sense of importance' in the tab 'Types of matter' (see the extract from the insight into the debugger below).

  • The type of procedural meaning Yes.
    • The type of procedural code is NCARE.
    • The community care test is applicable to the instance is Yes.
      • The instance name is CC020.

  The conclusion 'Yes' doesn't seem at all slot the legend 'issue sense of type' but does so under the legand 'community care' and the fact that legend "community care" is not capitalized, while the 'Community Care' value is, makes no difference.

  I solved the problem by checking all the legends against the values for the findings throughout the rule table and change the legends who have the same values as some conclusions.

  Hi thanks for raising it. Yes you're right, using captions that are the same as conclusions in the document of the excel rule causes ambiguous behavior, but we think that that is taken by a 10.3 validation error from. Can you confirm what version are you using? The latest version of the OPA is 10.4.4.

  See you soon

  Fiona

• Performance issue while stock reterieving/conclusion

  Hello friends,

  In the module inventory while the elements of recovery/conclusion takes too long, entire list takes 3 minutes at least to get all the items. There are about 10,000 positions in total.

  I downloaded the file tkprof here. Free file:

  call the query of disc elapsed to cpu count current lines

  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------

  Parse        2      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0

  Run 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0

  Get 32 253.39 253,46 0 161461280 0 20084

  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------

  Total 36 253,40 253,47 0 161461280 0 20084

  Chess in the library during parsing cache: 1

  Lack in the library during execution cache: 1

  Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS

  The analysis of the user id: 173 (APPS)

  Please, help me tune.

  Oracle EBS 12.1.1 with 11.1.0.7 on OEL 5.8 R.

  Thanks cordially

  Mohamed Ahmed

  HI Mohamed Ahmed,

  Please confirm that you have recently executed gather statistical diagram. Otherwise, run schema statistics gather and confirm.

  In addition, also see note:

  INCOIN: Why should the tables truncated Interface (Doc ID 1347604.1)

  Optimizing performance of import point Hub/inventory of Oracle (Doc ID 1208945.1) products

  Thank you &

  Best regards

• Several Conclusion based on input values

  Hello

  I think I have a request similar to this one: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9208952#9208952

  Basically, I have a requirement to return a list of the required documents, that someone has to download based on their application. The plan is to call the server of determinations through the web service interface to get a list of Documents (these would be URLs) required based on certain fields. I'm not sure how to read the rules and web service call that I would get a list of documents back. I want to finish in Excel and would like the URL as the conclusion with the attributes as input fields.

  for example, to write rules like:

  the value of field1	the value of Field2	document requiring the download
  X	THERE	http://mysite.com/mydocument1.PDF
  X	Z
  X	THERE	http://mysite.com/mydocument2.PDF

  and when I invoke the determinations of service with the values X and Y, the answer would be something like:

  < typ:attribute id = "document_to_upload" type = "string" deducted = "true" >

  < typ:boolean - val >http://mysite.com/mydocument1.pdf< / typ:boolean - val >

  < / typ:attribute >

  < typ:attribute id = "document_to_upload" type = "string" deducted = "true" >

  < typ:boolean - val >http://mysite.com/mydocument2.pdf< / typ:boolean - val >

  < / typ:attribute >

  CAN I love above and how do I structure the rules and webservice calls for a list of the documents back? Or what I have to write a table of rules for each type of document and request a result/finding for each other get the URL as the conclusion? Is one of the examples of projects that comes with the cover of the installation (or close) a scenario like this?

  Thank you

  Ross

  I'll start with the standard disclaimers that I do not work for Oracle, and simply writing the rules that are not legible and not based on politics can lead to less than optimal rulesets.  My response is limited to the issue.

  This is one of the several answers to your question as suggested by the above answer.  See the help topic OPM "writing rules that infer relationships and entities".

  Assuming that 'the documents requiring an upload' relationship text entity to the child such as "documents", then you can use a table of rules in Word with inferred entities, as in this example:

  Download documents requiring
  'http://mysite.com/mydocument1.pdf'.	both the value of field 1 = 'X' and the value of field 2 = 'Y '. or both the value of field 1 = 'X' and the value of field 2 = "Z".
  'http://mysite.com/mydocument2.pdf'.	the value of field 1 = 'X' and the value of field 2 = 'Y '.

• Problem with attribute negative conclusion

  Hello

  I wrote the rules below:

  rule_property [fragment: 3]

  The model does not have an x if action
  Current state of the system is not active

  rule_property [fragment: 4]

  The regime has an x if action
  The plan is supported by an action x

  Now debug I see below values for the basic attributes:

  The current state of the system is active

  The system does not support an action x

  The value of the conclusion is that "the regime has no action x".

  I expect the value of the conclusion to "the regime has an action x" as the attribute - 'current state of the system is active' is true.

  Can someone make me understand why he concludes then?

  Thank you

  I tested an it certainly looks like a bug. As you would expect he would say he has something to do with proving the negative value of a statement in a fragment and the positive of a statement in another fragment.

  I will record this as a bug, so we can look at fixing it for a future release

  Fortunately, there is a simple work around. The best work around for this is to use a table of rules. In general, I would still prefer a table of rules on fragments of rule for the following reasons:

  • you automatically get a clear order of evaluation (from top to bottom)
  • all the rules are in the same place.
  • The default value if no condition hold is clearly in line otherwise.

  ---------------------------------------------------------

  | The regime has an x if action

  ---------------------------------------------------------

  | fake | Current state of the system is not active

  ---------------------------------------------------------

  | true | The plan is supported by an action x

  ---------------------------------------------------------

  | uncertain | in the opposite case

  ---------------------------------------------------------

  Hope this helps

  See you soon

  Frank

• Referring to entities of a grandchild in an equation (statement of conclusion)

  Hi all
  
  Our project work with imported data of a Siebel OPA via Webshere database. We created the entities and attributes in OPM (10.2) in a similar structure to the way in which the data sources are organized in Siebel. Our data are modeled in 3 levels of nested entities (4 If you include the 'Global' entity). Here is the example that I work with:
  
  Top: Global
  2nd: the case
  3rd: the order of the Tribunal
  4th: the obligation
  
  I want to calculate the total value on a given case of obligations when the frequency of the obligation is "Weekly" (for example). I have successfully used ForScope, ExistsScope, etc., by the help topic "because of the relationship between two entities' in other rules bring entities into the same containment relationship within reach, where I am able to nest rules at several levels by examples, with each rule nested bringing another entity nested within the scope. However the problem here is that I try to integrate a grandchildren entity carried within the statement of a conclusion, where it seems that I can only refer to a parent-child relationship (i.e. within the InstanceSumIf function).
  
  I wonder if there is a simple way to achieve what I'm trying, or if we must rethink how we modeled our entity relationships, for example to move "duty" at the same level as 'order '.
  
  Any help will be greatly appreciated!
  Philippe

  I'm guessing that you have described entities are show containment relationships and that everything is connected by a one-to-many relationship? In other words:
  * Each OPA assessment can have several instances of
  * Each case can have several court orders
  * Each order of the Court may have multiple bonds

  Is this correct? Just curious... Is there a reason why each OPA assessment must be able to do the logic on multiple cases in the determination of one? For example do you ever need to work on things like the total cost of all cases? There may well be a good reason for the 'cases' are nested Global slot, but I don't know what your source material, so I'm just a question.

  Anyway... it is not unusual to have some data nested a few levels down and have to do a calculation of amount up to the top of the hierarchy of entities. When you need to do this, you can do the math in several steps. In your example, you could work the weekly obligations by order of the Court, then use this conclusion to work weekly obligations for each case, e.g.

  the cost of weekly obligations of the court order = InstanceSumIf (bonds, the obligation of cost, frequency of duty per week)

  the cost of weekly obligations for the case of = InstanceSum (court order, the cost of the weekly obligations of the order of the Court)

  See you soon,.
  Jasmine

• Min/max number of conclusion in a selected range of dates - Please HELP!

  Hi all

  I'm not very advanced at complex formulas however using this forum in recent weeks thanks to everyone here, I was able to create the automated collection of amazing data workbook. I searched for the last missing piece, and according to two explanations I've found here so far, that they are too complex for me to understand yet what I am eager to realize I thought was pretty simple.

  If anyone can help me with the formula to be used in these empty boxes, it will make my week!

  FYI, I use a mac look that is all to date.

  Thank you.

  

  Until there is an update to mac OS Sierra and new formula to exceed the numbers had worked for me. What is more, so I'm looking for the same answer on the new numbers. Take a look at the formula below and maybe it will give you an idea

  SUMIF (table 1: $1: $1, ">" & EOMONTH(A1,0) will GET (DATE ($A2, $ 1.1 M), 0), table 1: $VP)

• Conclusion removed the hard drive

  Our "old" laptop teacher at work will be used by students this year so our IT team has removed all hard drives.  Unfortunately, one of our teachers made a mistake on the external hard drive backup and lost his papers. The info was accidentally recorded on the hard drive... not the external drive. All hard drives (hundreds and hundreds) are now randomly laying in boxes.

  We can find the laptop that was hers, but is it possible to find the serial number for the hard drive that had been in it? Are the serial numbers for the laptop in any way linked to the serial number on the hard drive? Just try to find every way possible to help him.

  Not sure about the BONE... probably the latest or next to last.

  Thank you!

  There is no correlation between the installed hard drive and MacBooks in which they have been installed. Then the next number in the series could even have another brand of disc.

  Frankly, I can't remove these drives. A single pass of erasure with writing zeros would be crushed everything (but it takes all afternoon). Crushed once sufficient for everything but nuclear secrets.

• Conclusion the icon mouse.

  When I bought my new OS 10.10.5 they showed me how to make an icon of mouse 'lost' visible on the screen.  I forgot how.  Help, please.  Thank you.

  If you have OS X 10.11.x El Capitan, you just shake the mouse, the cursor will expand.