Conductor of telepresence clustered on the Wan

Similar Questions

• Conductor of telepresence

  Hello

  Any RDC to export report driver Telepresence is possible, as CUCM. or for having reported, we require MSDS. Pls suggest

  Conductor send data CDR what whether you are looking for the moment, see bug CSCuj42268, in order to get the Conference CDRs, you'll need to add conference bridges in MSDS. Below the limits of statement are described with conductor conferences.

  • Detail records (CDRs) of appeal conference bridges managed by TelePresence driver will contain all ConferenceIDs.
  • Conductor of telepresence itself does not feed back any conference CDRs to Cisco TMS. Bridges will be however, if added to the Cisco TMS.
  • According to the direction of the call, you could get incomplete of the COR, as outgoing calls can lead to incorrect data.
  • Bridge usage reports is not supported for conferences hosted on a driver of telepresence.

  To read these terms and others, refer to the conductor with the TMS (XC3.0 with TMS 14.6) Deployment Guide.  You can also check the local CMR Deployment Guides for more information as well.

• Conductor of telepresence on dial

  Hey guys,.

  I'm running into a problem where I can not the conductor of telepresence to dial on a TCS alias record.  I configured a location and a car participant made up, but when I have 2 people to participate in the Conference I never see the driver dial a number in the alias of the record.  I have checked the VCS logs and see nothing.  I'm sure I'm missing something stupid, but any help would be appreciated.  This is a new installation of net.

  Looks like you have a misconfigured port somewhere check your settings bridge conference Chief of Orchestra and conductor in your VCS area, make sure that all ports that you use match as well as the Protocol. The logs show that you use TLS, so you'll want to port 5061.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• The WAN Port is communicating with the Ethernet switch?

  I have a Comcast gateway that the router is disabled in so it acts only as a modem. This is related to an Airport Extreme, which serves as my router via the WAN on the AE port. I created a different WAP with a Capsule temporal from the airport, located downstairs with an Ethernet cable from one of the Ethernet ports on the AE to the WAN on the TC port. I think it's what we call a 'roaming network.

  My question is, can I connect my switch Gigabit 8 ports in one of the Ethernet ports on the TC to complete connections wired to all devices connected on it, or should I first connect EI to the switch 8 ports and then connect the switch to the port WAN TC to complete my network "roaming"? In other words, plug it into the port WAN AE or TC still allows you to use other Ethernet ports as a switch?

  Thank you!

  can I plug my Gigabit 8 ports switch in one of the ports Ethernet on the TC to complete wired connections to all devices connected on it

  Yes, assuming that the TC has been configured to run in Bridge Mode, which would be normal.

  or should I first connect EI to the switch 8 ports and then connect the switch to the TC WAN port to complete my network "roaming"?

  It would be considered preferable to wiring, if it is convenient to do so.  For example, in the configuration of the wiring in the previous example just above... If there is a problem with the time Capsule, then all devices connected to the switch to the time Capsule would have a problem as well.

  If the switch is connected to the AirPort Extreme, and the TC is then connected to the switch... If the TC has a problem, the other devices connected to the switch of will not be affected.

• FN + F8 does not work which allows the Wan on Portege M700

  Hi all

  On my Portege M700 (Vista), I can see that by pressing FN + F8 should scroll through the devices and activate the internal device of WAN (HSDPA).

  But it doesn't seem to do anything.

  What could I do wrong here?

  Hello

  As far as I know that some models are equipped with the Wireless WAN functions.
  Did you buy the m700 with WAN functionality?

  Usually the WAN indicator lights or flashes blue when the Wireless WAN function is activated.
  The indicator will light up or blink to indicate the status of the connection to the WAN service.

  But note!
  The WAN card must be installed to use this feature. Some models are equipped with such a card, but NOT all!

• Receive "the IP is in conflict with the WAN IP subnet" when changes of LAN

  Hello

  I have the following features:

  ProSafe FVS336Gv3
  Router R6300v2

  The static IP setting for the LAN on the Prosafe is 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0
  The static IP setting for the router WAN is 192.168.1.101/255.255.255.0
  The static IP setting for the router's local network is 10.9.8.1/255.255.255.0

  The settings of the router LAN, if I try to disable the DHCP server, I get the message:

  The IP address with the IP WAN subnet conflicts. Please enter a different IP address.

  Any ideas?

  Please notify.

  Have a great day,

  Don

  Eventually be a DNS setting on the WAN port on the router.

• Table of clusters and the cluster is a bar counter, how can I change the color individually?

  Table of clusters and the cluster is a bar counter, how do I change the color of the bar individual meter for each element of the array?  I just realized that you cannot change the properties of an element of the array without changing everything.  For scale, I had to make digital for each graduation of the scale indicators so that each measure meter in the table in the cluster has individual scales.  I also had to do some calculations for each barmeter to display the correct proportions of 0 to 100% on the scale.  Now, I'm stumped on the color of the bar counter.  Basically, if the value exceeds a set value, the meter bar should turn red.  It must be in a table to be infinitely scalable.

  Thank you

  Matt

  And yet anothr approach...

  Right click on the bar of > Options to fill > maximum fill.

  

  The fill color of the same color as the background color, then make the background color transparent.

  Drop a box of color BEHIND the bar and the size correctly.

  He has this strange background 3D with flat bar, but what the Hey, his relatives. If its important a custom color box.

  Ben

• Why can't I access my server sharepoint since the WAN?

  When you try to access my sharepoint since the WAN Portal get the login prompt for my domain credentials that I get them & the answer I get is "the current Web page is trying to open a site on your intranet. You want to allow this? Yes takes me to the my part of sites. Don't give me internet explore cannot display the Web page. & in the URL, I see the name of the server as I see on my local network. I did the following: DNS has a CNAME record for the sharepoint server and the good record for the good IP. I made sure that the ISP has NAT for the server sharepoint LAN ip:100 to the external IP address. Also ensured that the public dns ip corresponds to the external ip address. Don't know what I'm missing.

  Ask the question in the SHAREPOINT FORUMS:
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/SharePoint/

• LRT224 hickups: abandon the WAN connection?

  Hello

  my new LRT224 shows hickups in my regard.

  It is connected to a fiber-optic 100Mbps of my ISP connection.

  If I try to stream video, it creates every minute or so a second or two to break up the transmission.

  Obviously, this breaks my video stream.

  The newspaper of the device (see below), says 'WAN connection fell', which seems rather strange and unexpected for me.

  If I don't stream video and data binding is almost at rest, these messages of 'WAN fell' intermittent continue.

  If I take the LRT outside and connect my PC directly to the line of ISP (Yes, bad practice) I don't have these hickups, and fine video streams (to a few Mbps).

  I have updated the firmware to v1.0.1.01 but that has not made a difference.

  In fact, I have disabled the 2nd WAN port.

  "Dual WAN', the 'activate the Network Service detection' is not marked in the config. By selecting "Connection failover" or "Load balance" shows no difference (no improvement).

  No idea why the LRT report "WAN connection is dropped?

  I need urgently a solution, but the issue seems beyond my skills...

  (In the newspaper, I also see "violation of policy. I don't know why they happen: I have no rules of firewall on the LAN or WAN IP addresses...)

  Thanks for any idea!

  Jos

  He is a legend of the newspaper of the device:

  Feb 26 18:28:37 2014  System Log  WAN connection is down
  Feb 26 18:28:38 2014     System Log  WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:30:51 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.106:55059->173.192.114.54:7031 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:30:58 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.108:65516->89.248.168.42:3129 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:31:33 2014     System Log  WAN connection is down
  Feb 26 18:31:34 2014     System Log  WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:31:36 2014    ACCESS_RULE TCP 192.168.1.107:65516->157.55.56.153:3129 on eth0
  Feb 26 18:31:37 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.106:55159->199.9.249.46:1935 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:31:37 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.106:55158->199.9.249.46:1935 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:31:37 2014    ACCESS_RULE TCP 192.168.1.107:55158->157.55.56.153:1935 on eth0
  Feb 26 18:31:51 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.106:55059->173.192.114.54:7031 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:32:50 2014     System Log  WAN connection is down
  Feb 26 18:32:51 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.108:49527->78.235.240.121:57236 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:32:51 2014     System Log  WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:33:51 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.106:55059->173.192.114.54:7031 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:33:58 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.108:49374->89.248.168.42:3129 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:34:51 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.106:55059->173.192.114.54:7031 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:34:59 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.108:49499->90.24.175.227:57402 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:39:06 2014    ACCESS_RULE TCP 192.168.1.107:49499->111.221.74.31:57402 on eth0
  Feb 26 18:39:13 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.108:49837->89.248.168.42:3129 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:39:13 2014    ACCESS_RULE TCP 192.168.1.107:49837->65.55.223.46:3129 on eth0
  Feb 26 18:39:57 2014     Connection Refused - Policy violation  TCP 192.168.1.108:49584->92.142.109.203:57209 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:42:32 2014     System Log  WAN connection is down
  Feb 26 18:42:33 2014     System Log  WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:43:16 2014     System Log  WAN connection is down
  Feb 26 18:43:18 2014     System Log  WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:49:53 2014     System Log  WAN connection is down
  Feb 26 18:49:54 2014     System Log  WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
  Feb 26 18:50:42 2014     System Log  WAN connection is down
  Feb 26 18:50:44 2014     System Log  WAN connection is up : 5.199.147.151/255.255.240.0 gw 5.199.144.1 on eth1
  

  Hello

  Thanks for your replies!  I looked in the settings and methods to verify this behavior.

  In the end, I decided that the behaviour of "drop the WAN" is not not to blame the LRT224: it seems really to be created by the ISP (the fiber modem): when I plug a small switch between the router and the modem 'abandonment WAN' messages have disappeared.  Now I 'just' convince my ISP to do something...

• WRT350n - what is the speed of the WAN port?

  Hello

  Virginmedia in the United Kingdom have 50 MB download capability now that I am interested in buying. I was advised to check that my current router (wrt350n V2 firmware v2.00.18) is able to handle this speed on its WAN port before you sign up. It is not clear on the data sheet if the WAN port is gigabut able ehternet, as well as the 4 ethernet ports, and I wanted to ask you just to be absolutely sure.

  Any help or clarification gratefully received.

  Snert

  As the router that you have its a gigabyte wireless router bits, and all the LAN port at the back of the router are the Giga bit Ports LAN. Your router will work with the speed of 50 MB, and you should be able to go online from all your computers.

• is possible to configure the wan on Dell N3024 switch port

  Hello

  as I said in the topic. I got a new switch N3024 of Dell.  I worked in before cisco, but dell is new to me. I have a few question to ask: -.

  is that we can configure wan on that port?

  is - this switch supports the aggregation of the ISL?

  If Yes please share the switch manual

  Thanks in advance

  The WAN connection is made usually by creating a VLAN and assignment of an IP address in the same subnet as the device that it connects this VLAN.

  Example:

  Create VLAN 10

  database of # vlan

  VLAN # 10

  For example let's say that 1/0/1 interface connects your firewall, which has an IP 10.10.10.1 30 assigned to its interface. This means that we would assign 10.10.10.2 30 to VLAN 10.

  # interface vlan 10

  # 10.10.10.2/30 ip address

  Then place the interface 1/0/1 in access mode for VLAN 10.

  # interface gigabitethernet 0/1/1

  switchport mode access #.

  # switchport access vlan 10

  Enable the VLAN routing on the switch.

  # ip Routing

  Define a static route pointing out traffic at the firewall.

  # ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.1

  Orders of trunking VLAN are very similar to the Cisco commands.

  # interface gigabitethernet 0/1/1

  switchport mode trunk #.

  # permit switchport trunk VLANs 1-1024

  Here is a link to the user's guides:

  http://Dell.to/1ZTGjsI

  And here is another link to some useful white papers:

  http://Dell.to/1cxlYEX

  Hope this helps

• How to choose right for the WAN Interface MTU size?

  Hello

  I would like to know How to determine the right size MTU to set in the properties of the WAN interface (in my case, NSA appliances).

  First of all. I noticed that with SonicOS Enhanced 5.9.x, there is a Tool of diagnosis called PMTU discovery:

  

  This tool is not available with SonicOS Enhanced 5.8.x.

  I guess using this built-in tool is a way to determine the right MTU size to apply.

  Second, for SonicOS versions that do not have this tool and to understand just how to manually determine the size MTU, I would like to know what is the method to follow.

  On the Internet, I found this method by using the ping-f-l command. Once you have determined the largest possible packet size, it ask you to Add 28 to that number and you get the MTU size to define the interface.

  Case study:

  In my business, there are 2 sites: 1 in China and 1 in South Korea. Both have a firewall SonicWALL NSA.

  To determine the MTU size that is applicable from the Chinese site, I get the same results with the 2 methods mentioned above.

  With the help of the PMTU discovery:

  I get 2 IPs: 8.8.8.8 and the Korean FW IP WAN. I get the same result: 1500.

  

  

  However, I noticed that the MTU size should be set to its maximum (1500) of size on the properties of the interface WAN for this test to work properly. Indeed, when I put in 1404 to test, PMTU discovery find 1404 such as MTU size:

  

  

  With the help of ping - f - l:

  When you use the ping with FW Korea WAN IP method, I found 1472 as the maximum packet size:

  

  According to the method I've read on the Internet, adding 28 will make me a MTU of 1500, same size as the PMTU discovery method.

  My question is: can you confirm that these 2 methods are correct determine the MTU size to set the WAN interface? Especially the one with the ping command? If not, how do?

  Thanks in advance for your comments.

  I can tell you that as technicians, we use the way to CMD line to adjust the MTU on WAN interfaces. We saw this as a number to work with.

  Thank you
  Ben D
  #Iwork4Dell

• AnyConnect works at the main location and for internet, but not over the WAN

  I have a firewall of 5525 asa running an Anyconnect VPN.  I have three sites and it will be the access point for all.  There is a mpls wan between sites.  The Anyconnect IP pool is 192.168.165.x 255.255.255.0. In the primary site, the local IP addresses are 172.17.x.x 255.255.0.0 and 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.x legacy.  Remote sites are 192.168.20.x 255.255.255.0 and 192.168.30.x 255.255.255.0.

  From a PC to my LAN, I can reach the four lines and servers ping, tracert, and access by name or number.  When it is connected to the the anyconnect, I can only access the 172.17.x.x and 192.168.10.x.  We're set up for a lot of tunnel the VPN so this is important.  I tried to add routes to the routers on each side of the WAN to point 192.168.165.x traffic to the firewall's inside address based on a tip I read on the map here, but that did not help.  Any ideas where I should look next?

  Thanks for your help,

  Brad

  Cant it ASA itself remote peripheral ping at all sites?

  You have the NAT rules in place for example all traffic to the VPN range?

• router in 1941 with the wan, backup interface

  people

  I am looking to set up an interface to backup to a remote site, I have

  the current configuration is a 1941 (15.1 (4) M3) with two interfaces, lan and wan

  I now need to create a course of failover if the wan link fails

  I am considering using a service provider VSDL who will provide me with an Ethernet port on a modem and then use PPPoE to authenticate to the ISP and get an IP etc.

  I intend to use an IP SLA to create traffic and road condition in case of failure of the primary wan link dialer interface failover

  traffic on the two links will be also encrypted on a l2l tunnel using IPsec profiles

  I have already implemented and tested in VIRL using standard Ethernet ports but have not yet tested with an ip and PPPoE Dialer

  I know what I want to do is not new, but I hope someone out there can point me to a recent guide to config or sharing their problems with a similar configuration

  Thanks to anyone who takes the time to read this or answer

  Hello

  between these docs should almost get up and running that have all examples, pppoe, ip sla failover with the ACB and the nat if needed, just tweak it for your configuration

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/32186/dual-Internet-links-NATIN...

  https://learningnetwork.Cisco.com/thread/87317

  http://www.ciscozine.com/dual-Internet-connections-in-activestandby-mode...

  PPPOE

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/routers/access/800/software/CONFIGU...

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/routers/access/800/software/CONFIGU...

  EDIT: commands are same for 1941 as 800

  tshoot good guide for pppoe

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/long-reach-Ethernet-LRE-Digita...

• RV042G difference between the Strip protocol binding bandwidth <>- for the WAN ports

  Can someone explain a little better then the manual what are the differences between the management of bandwidth on the WAN ports and protocol bindings?

  If you specify in each section which protocol should go where, why have two places to set this up?

  Or are there things to remember when you use one of them?

  Protocol binding affects the leaves of outgoing traffic how a particular WAN interface.

  With bandwidth management, you specify bandwidth across WAN, a service must be used.