Conentrator PIX using NAT on the PIX?

Similar Questions

• Host a server using NAT on the player

  I am trying to host an instance of test Sharepoint on VMPlayer using the NAT network setting.

  It seems that workstation has the ability to change the NAT/firewall settings used by VMWare, but I can not find similar settings of the player.

  Can someone help me with the right settings?

  Thank you.

  looking for vmnetcfg.exe missing because a bug in the setup of vmplayer.
  launch the setup of vmplayer again with a command like this

  VMware-player * .exe/e tempdir

  find a network.cab to tempdir and remove it
  Copy vmnetcfg.exe into the install dir player

  by the way - the NAT service is not very stable - I don't want to use it for an important service

• Should I static if I'm not using nat on pix 6.2?

  I have pix 6.2 and not nat address translation, I use everything I have nat from the East:

  NAT (inside) - 0 200 access list

  NAT (inside) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  NAT (dmz:2) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  and then I have the configured static next:

  static (inside, outside) LotusSrv LotusSrv netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (inside, outside) 81-mail mail-81 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (inside, outside) Bookstore Bookstore netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (inside, dmz:2) 204.142.81.0 204.142.81.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 0 0

  static (dmz:2, outside) Venus Venus netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  and much more... but not for guests...

  Lie, I have no overall control.

  I just want to know what are these static commands, I can delete them and how to decide who hosts that I have to configure static?

  Statix expose ip addresses of interfaces of high security to low security ints. Once created, you can then use pipes or access lists to allow access of ints low to high s ints. Then Yes, you need to keep all those who, if they provide services to the outside world.

  Matt

• Public and private IPs on the same Interface by using NAT Exemption/policy NAT

  I'm looking for some feedback on whether my thoughts on the installation program will run.

  Equipment: PIX 515E 6.2 (2)

  Scenario:

  The inside interface of the PIX will host 3 blocks of addresses IP - 24 public 2 blocks and 1 private/16 block. (All IP addresses have been replaced by dummy blocks.)

  Blocks of audiences:

  * 192.168.10.0/24

  * 192.168.20.0/24

  Block of private:

  * 10.50.0.0/16

  Traffic from the public 2/24 blocks should go through the firewall without address translation.

  The two blocs of the public will be able to receive connections initiated from the Internet.

  Public blocks will need to be able to send and receive traffic on a static VPN tunnel to our headquarters without subject to address translation

  Traffic leaving the sector private/16 block should be subjected to PAT before passing through the firewall.

  Private/block 16 will not receive incoming traffic from the Internet (other than responses to outbound connections initiated from within the private block).

  However, the private block will also have to be able to send and receive traffic on a static VPN tunnel to our headquarters * without * subject to address translation (i.e. hosts on our corporate network must be able to initiate connections to the private block and vice versa).

  The inside interface of the PIX will be connected to a Catalyst 3xxx series layer 3 switch, which will be responsible for routing all internal (so the PIX will never be routing of traffic on the interface, it was received).

  My ideas on how to implement are:

  * Use the exemption of NAT to exempt public address translation blocks. This will allow incoming and outgoing connections through the firewall.

  * Use the exemption of NAT to exempt the block private NAT when connecting to our head office on the VPN tunnel.

  * Use policy NAT w / PAT to translate the block private connecting to all other hosts.

  I have translated these thoughts in the following configuration snippet.

  Because the NAT exemption is processed before policy NAT in the evaluation of the NAT rules, I believe that this should allow the public IP blocks treat incoming/outgoing traffic without translation, while submitting the private translation block (except during handling of incoming/outgoing connections to our network of corporate office).

  Can someone confirm my assumptions about this?

  # ----------------------------------------------------------------------

  traffic of # which should be exempted from translation

  permit ip 192.168.10.0 access list nat_exempt 255.255.255.0 any

  nat_exempt 192.168.20.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 any

  nat_exempt ip 10.50.0.0 access list allow 255.255.0.0 10.100.0.0/16

  traffic of # which should be the subject of translation

  policy_nat ip 10.50.0.0 access list allow 255.255.0.0 any

  # Suppose 192.168.5.1 is the address to use for PAT

  Global (outside) 1 192.168.5.1

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access nat_exempt

  NAT (inside) 1 access-list policy_nat

  # assumes that 192.168.10.7 is the IP address of the inside layer 3 switch

  Route inside 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.7 1

  Route inside 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.7 1

  Route inside 10.50.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.10.7 1

  #assume the following configuration sections appear elsewhere: static tunnel VPN, ACL, ifconfig, etc..

  # ----------------------------------------------------------------------

  Yes, this will work, even if you don't need political NAT for the 10.50.0.0 network. For PAT the 10.50.0.0 network when to anywhere (except via VPN) just do:

  Global 1 192.168.15.1 (outside)

  NAT (inside) 1 10.50.0.0 255.255.0.0

  As I said, you have works perfectly, the above is just an easier way to do it.

• Guest OS using NAT and host wireless can ping Google but can't surf the net

  Hi all.

  I just installed 'Vmware Workstation ACE Edition' Version: 6.0.0 build-45731

  I then installed a new virtual machine Windows XP SP2 home edition.

  My host is a business of W7, browse the internet using a wireless network card. (I currently don't have a way to have the physical NIC connected to it).

  My conf wireless host is:

  LAN wireless adapter wireless network connection:

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Connection network Intel (r) PRO / Wireless 3945ABG

  DHCP active...: Yes

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  IPv4 address: 192.168.1.33 (Preferred)

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  Lease obtained...: Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:50

  Lease expires...: Sunday, December 5, 2010 10:49:59

  ... Default gateway. : 192.168.1.1.

  DHCP server...: 192.168.1.1.

  DNS servers...: 192.168.1.1.

  NetBIOS over TCP/IP...: enabled

  The goal is simple: be able to surf the web with my guest OS (Windows XP Home edition).

  I first tried to bridge with VMnet0 = > KO (no ping, no navigation)

  I then tried NAT which is by default bound to VMnet08 = > always KO but:

  -I can ping google.com:

  Ping google.com http://173.194.36.104 with 32 bytes of data:

  Reply from 173.194.36.104: bytes = 32 time = 765ms TTL = 128

  -I can not always surfing the net

  When you activate NAT on the guest operating system the ipconfig gives the following:

  Ethernet connection to the Local network card:

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. : localdomain

  ... The IP address: 192.168.31.128

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  ... Default gateway. : 192.168.31.2.

  I do not have an anti virus installed on the client

  I tried to disable windows firewall with no luck

  I tried telnet google.com port 80 = > KO

  C:\ > telnet google.com 80

  Login to google.com... Could not open connection to the host, on port 80: Co

  nnect failed

  Any help, tracks, ideas, would be greatly appreciated.

  Thanks in advance

  Michael

  Just an info, Windows 7 is not a host VMware Ace/Workstation 6 operating system.  Also why do you install 6.0.0 vs install 6.0.5?

  Have you tried to manually set DNS servers to no known public IP address just leave it to the private IP address that you have shown by default?

  Give a try:

  OpenDNS

  208.67.222.222

  208.67.220.220

  Or

  Google Public DNS

  8.8.8.8

  8.8.4.4

• Using NAT, the host looking for viruses?

  After installing a virus (Avast) in Guest XP64 auditor in Vista 64 host and using NAT, I was wondering if the host has been looking for the virus before it past internet data to the customer?  This would make unnecessary the use of a virus checker in exercising of rose-> comments.  I doubt it, but it seems worth asking.  Thank you.

  of course not - it's just a simple NAT service - happening packages based on IPs - it does not inspect packages

  ___________________________________

  VMX-settings- VMware-liveCD - VM-infirmary

• Inside Source NAT from the remote host and VPN from Site to Site

  Hi all

  I was in charge of the construction of a vpn tunnel with a firewall PIX of our business partner company and ASA of the other company of the firewall.  Traffic will be A partner business users will access my company Citrix server.  I want to source-pat the user traffic partner company to PIX of my business within the interface to its entry in my LAN to access my company Citrix server.  The partner company will be PAT'ing their traffic from users to a single ip address - Let's say for discussion end is 65.99.100.101.  There is the site to site vpn configuration, and configure nat be performed to allow this traffic in accordance with the above provisions.

  I'm more concerned about the accuracy of the configuration of the domain encryption because NAT is involved in this whole upward.  My goal is to NAT (of the other company company a) ip address to a routable ip address in my company network.

  The fundamental question here is should I include the ip address of real source (65.99.100.101) of the company the user or IP natted (10.200.11.9) in the field of encryption.

  In other words should the encryption field looks like this

  OPTION A.

  permit ip host 10.200.11.103 65.99.100.101

  OR

  OPTION B

  permit ip host 10.200.11.103 10.200.11.9

  I'm inclined to think it should look like OPTION A.  Here's the part of MY complete SOCIETY of the VPN configuration.  I've also attached a diagram illustrating this topology.

  Thanks in advance,

  Adil

  CONFIG BELOW

  ------------------------------------------------

  #################################################

  Object-group Config:

  #################################################

  the COMPANY_A_NETWORK object-group network

  Description company network access my company A firm Citrix

  host of the object-Network 65.99.100.101

  the MYCOMPANY_CITRIX_FARM object-group network

  Description farm Citrix accessible Takata by Genpact

  host of the object-Network 10.200.11.103

  ################################################

  Config of encryption:

  ################################################

  crypto ISAKMP policy 20

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  sha hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  ********************************

  CRYPTO MAP

  ********************************

  crypto Outside_map 561 card matches the address Outside_561_cryptomap

  card crypto Outside_map 561 set peer 55.5.245.21

  Outside_map 561 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA crypto card game

  ********************************

  TUNNEL GROUP

  ********************************

  tunnel-group 55.5.245.21 type ipsec-l2l

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 55.5.245.21

  pre-shared-key * 55.5.245.21

  *******************************

  FIELD OF CRYPTO

  *******************************

  Outside_561_cryptomap list extended access permitted ip object-group MYCOMPANY_CITRIX_FARM-group of objects COMPANY_A_NETWORK

  ###########################################

  NAT'ing

  ###########################################

  Global (inside) 9 10.200.11.9

  NAT (9 genpact_source_nat list of outdoor outdoor access)

  genpact_source_nat list extended access permit ip host 65.99.100.101 all

  genpact_source_nat list extended access permit ip host 65.99.100.102 all

  ! For not natting ip address of the Citrix server

  Inside_nat0 list extended access permitted ip object-group MYCOMPANY_CITRIX_FARM-group of objects COMPANY_A_NETWORK

  You must include pre - nat ip 65.99.x.x in your crypto-card, like you did.

  For me, config you provided here looks good and meets your needs.

  One thing, I do not see here the nat rule real 0, but there is the ACL that NAT. probably, you just forgot this rule.

  65.99.100.101 #sthash.mQm0FIOM.dpuf

• Static NAT with the road map for excluding the VPN

  We have problems of access to certain IPs NATted static via a VPN.  After some research, we have learned that you have to exclude traffic destined for the VPN to the static NAT using a road map. So we did this:

  10.1.1.x is the VPN IP pool.

  access-list 130 refuse ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 130 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  sheep allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 130

  IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 1.1.1.1 sheep map route

  Above worked to fix the VPN but the IP 192.168.1.5 is no longer publicly available via 1.1.1.1.  What seems to happen, is that the static NAT is not really work and this IP address is NATted with the IP of PAT.

  Any ideas on how to get this to work?

  Thank you
  Diego

  Hello

  The following example details exactly your case:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094634.shtml

  Try to replace the 192.168.1.0 subnet by the host address.

  It should work

  HTH

  Laurent.

• Multiple outside NAT at the same internal IP address

  In my view, the answer is no, but wanted to check.

  Can I have multiple NATs on the same interface to a single internal IP?

  For example.

  static (inside, outside) a.a.a.2 10.20.30.248 netmask 255.255.255.255

  static (inside, outside) a.a.a.3 10.20.30.248 netmask 255.255.255.255

  Where the subnet and the IP block is also on for two external NATs.

  Hello

  If you try to do the following:

  definition of the IP 10.20.30.248 to a.a.a.2

  and

  definition of the IP 10.20.30.248 to a.a.a.3.

  Learn to translate the internal ip address to two external ip addresses. If Yes, then this is not possible.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards

  Anisha

  P.S.: Please mark this thread as answered, if you feel that your query is resolved. Note the useful messages.

• Static and dynamic NAT at the same time?

  Is this possible? Let's say you have 20 public address pool and you have 30 computers LAN. You want to assign the same public address for some of the servers. And the rest can get the addresses of the pool at random.

  It would be nice if we can easily do the appropriate firewall rules.

  Yes, it is possible, you can use nat and global commands for dynamic conversion and use the static commands for static translation at the same time.

  Here is an example:

  Public rate IP-range outdoors: xxx.xxx.xxx.0/27

  (IP addresses are xxx.xxx.xxx.1 - xxx.xxx.xxx.30)

  Private range of IP addresses on the inside: yyy.yyy.yyy.0/24

  In the example I'm going to static translate xxx.xxx.xxx.2 to yyy.yyy.yyy.2 Server1 (ditto for server2, but by using adresse.3)

  All other IP addresses is translated dynamics.

  Here is an example of how you can do this:

  IP address outside xxx.xxx.xxx.1 255.255.255.224

  IP address yyy.yyy.yyy.1 255.255.255.0 inside

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  NAT (inside) 1 yyy.yyy.yyy.0 255.255.255.0

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  public static yyy.yyy.yyy.2 xxx.xxx.xxx.2 (indoor, outdoor)

  public static yyy.yyy.yyy.3 xxx.xxx.xxx.3 (indoor, outdoor)

  access-list deny ip host yyy.yyy.yyy.2 sheep all

  access-list deny ip host yyy.yyy.yyy.3 sheep all

  access-list sheep ip allow a whole

  Kind regards

  Leo

• Cisco IOS - how config static nat to NAT on the VPN

  Hello world

  I need help.

  I configured a VPN site-to site between two routers IOS. One of the routers already had a static NAT (172.16.100.1 inside to the public IP address), but this static NAT prevents remote VPN hosts access to the 172.16.100.1 home as it tries to the response to public IP NAT router configured.

  Does anyone know how to use static NAT for the inside to the outside, but don't not NAT inside to outside VPN traffic?

  I know how to make using a roadmap for "overload" dynamic NAT, but I can't? t see how you can use a roadmap on the static NAT statement.

  You can provide any help would be appreciated.

  Chris

  Hi Chris

  Take a look at the document atatched with gives a few examples of the very thing you are trying to do.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide09186a0080087bac.html

  HTH

  Jon

• 8.4 ASA using NAT VPN issue.

  Hello

  I'm working on a customer site and they have a problem with one of their VPN (we have other works well), but it is a major issue and I think it's because we use manual NAT and NAT of the object on the same server for different things.

  Traffic between indoors and outdoors:

  It works with a specific manual NAT rule of source from the server 10.10.10.10 object

  Inside

  SRC-> DST

  10.10.10.10-> 1.1.2.10 1.1.1.10-> 1.1.2.10 SNAT = VPN =-> 1.1.2.10 1.1.1.10 1.1.1.10-> 1.1.2.10 <3rd party="" fw="">

  It works with a specific using the NAT on the server of 10.10.10.10 object

  Remote

  SRC-> DST

  1.1.1.10-> 1.1.2.10 1.1.1.10-> 1.1.2.10 <3rd party="" fw="">= VPN =-> 1.1.2.10 1.1.1.10 1.1.1.10-> DNAT 10.10.10.10

  If we have the manual NAT and NAT object it does anyway.

  So the question is (as I am new to zip code 8.3 ASA) should not mix the 2 types of NAt and look at configuring it all with manual NAT or NAT object?

  With the NAT object out it does not work as it is taken in ouside NAT inside all:

  Dynamic NAT (inside, outside) source no matter what interface (this NAT to 1.1.1.1 then does not match the card encryption for VPN)

  and I tried a no - nat above that, but that does not work either.

  Straws and hugging come to mind try to configure a different config. Any pointers in the right direction would be great.

  Kind regards

  Z

  Hello

  I'm not sure that installing even with the explanation. Each NAT configuration I did for VPN used Section 1 Manual / NAT twice.

  You have configured the rule by default PAT that you use as Section 1 NAT rule. NAT rules in the new software are divided into 3 sections

  • Section 1: Manual / twice by NAT
  • Section 2: Purpose NAT
  • Section 3: Manual / double NAT (moved to section 3 using the setting "auto after")
  • The Sections are passed by from 1 to 2 and 3 in order to find a match.

  You should also notice that the Section 1 and Section 3 NAT has "line number" similar to the ACL parameter type. So if you have a default existing PAT rule configured for Section 1 and just add another Section 1 NAT rule without line/order number (VPN NAT) then it will just fall under the existing rule, making the new useless rule.

  I would advice against the use of the rule by default PAT as Section 1 NAT rule. Finally, this means that you be constantly watch and edit its configuration when you try to configure more specific rules.

  As a general rule 3 of the Section the PAT above default configuration would be the following

  NAT (inside, outside) after the automatic termination of dynamic source no matter what interface

  This would mean that you need to remove the old. That would mean as naturally as the change would temporarily dismantling all the current connections through "inside", "Outside" while you change the NAT rule format.

  If after this configure a NAT twice to the VPN (wihtout the setting "auto after"), it will be the rule in article 1 while the default PAT will be Section 3. Of course, Section 1 will be matched first.

  I'm not quite sure of what your setup of the foregoing have understood.

  You're just source NAT?

  I guess that the configuration you do is something like this?

  network of the LAN-REAL object

  10.10.10.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

  purpose of the MAPPED in LAN network

  1.1.1.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

  being REMOTE-LAN network

  1.1.2.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

  NAT static destination of LAN LAN-REAL-MAPPED Shared source (indoor, outdoor) REMOTE - LAN LAN

  If the network 1.1.1.0/24 is supposed to be one that is connected directly to your "external" to the format interface may need to be anything else.

  -Jouni

• How to get a reservation in DHCP address when using NAT networking?

  I am looking for a solution on how to make a reservation in DHCP for a VM for Linux Mint13 when using NAT networking.

  It would make life so much easier if I could be sure that this machine has a fixed IP address, I might add in the host to host files and thus get name resolution working for her.

  I use the virtual linux machine mainly to test a Web site before going live and I used the bridged network and listed my DLINK router DHCP reservation.

  But it won't work if I move the laptop Win7 to another place, so I really need NAT and a fixed address.

  I found this discussion, which deals with the same issue so I followed the solution and this added to the end of vmnetdhcp.conf:

  host agiwebdev {}

  Hardware ethernet 00: 0C: 29:72:09:58;

  fixed-address 192.168.80.10;

  }

  (with comments, stop and WorkStation7 closed altogether).

  But the result after starting it all this is still once the client always reports its address as 192.168.80.157, which is the old address it before my edit.

  What have I done wrong?

  The guest of LinuxMint13 was created and is running in VMWare Workstation on a host Win7ProX64 7.1.6

  I'm really stupid...

  It turns out that the answer was in the discussion I linked to:

  Restart the service of Windows 7 VMWare DHCP service with disconnected guest network card, then plug it in and the new address is here!

  Simple as that!

  So in fact already was answering the question I asked.

• Using DHCP from the server, no VMware

  I put in place 2003 server, DNS and DHCP on my first virtual machine.  I want my second virtual machine (windows xp) to get its IP address from the first machine, through DHCP.  Ive read the manual, but I'm just simply do not understand how VMware's DHCP and the network mapping.  Its a bit much to wrap around my head.  Can someone point me in the right direction here?

  How can I know which machines are using what VMnets?  Expected each machine use bridged connection?

  Thanks for any help

  If you bridge then the guests need to have unique IP addresses on the same subnet as the NETWORK card on the host on which they are bridged to. There shouldn't be any provided VMware DHCP on the interface that is connected by a bridge, only NAT and host-only. If you want Internet connectivity, so you can use bridged or NAT. shouldn't have problem with bridged and have your own DHCP server - works fine for me without any special configuration. If you do an "ipconfig/all" in the comments, where it becomes an IP address? Note that your DHCP server is obviously going to have to have a fixed IP address in the range of 192.168.1.x.

  ---

  If you have found this device or any other answer useful please consider the use of buttons useful or Correct to award points.

• activation lock (iphone 6s) told my MAID ID Apple"cannot be used to unlock the iphone. »

  I reset my phone to delete all data and settings. Don't want to sell I just did this because I wanted to clear space and I have always done this way without any problems. Once I reset it asked me to choose my language and country, then WiFi. After I walked in that I see the lock of the Activation screen. I get my Apple ID, I used with this phone and password and he told me '[email protected]' cannot be used to unlock the iPhone. "After you enter my apple ID and password several times, I tried using past apple ID and they no longer work. I don't know what to do, I tried to remove my camera of find my iPhone after I saw that as an option in the face of this problem, and that didn't work either because my phone showed "offline". Help, please.

  When you went to iCloud.com since a desktop browser and saw the device as long as it is in offline mode, do you have it removed from your account? You should be able to do after you have selected the delete option (even if it is in offline mode) or in the drop devices, there should be an 'X' next to your device. After that, reboot your device and start implementing screens.

  Do your you're on Wi-Fi good during the editing process. Bottom line, a manager of the Apple Store may remove the lock, but you'll need a receipt.