Extremely slow running VM XP in Windows 7 (7 post)
I'm running a Windows 7 thinkpad with 4 GB of ram and a 2.4 GHz processor. When running an XP VM, I get unusually high processor utilization. I ran the same configuration (a laptop even slower) under WS 6.x with much better results. No idea as to what could happen? I've attached a screenshot of its use within the virtual machine.
The host is Windows 7 RTM and virtual Windows XP SP3 machine.
Thank you.
Why you set up a virtual computer with 2 processors - your host should have at least 4 cores before such a framework works well.
But in this case, I guess that there is also something wrong with the USB - if you do not need USB disable for a test
___________________________________
VMX-settings- VMware-liveCD - VM-infirmary
Tags: VMware
Similar Questions
-
Why, in the business of Vista, is extremely slow and almost unusable in Windows Live Mail?
After moving from Windows Mail to Live Mail, the program is too slow. On the other hand, the Windows Mail is fast enough.
Submit all Live queries on the forum right here:
Windows Live Solution Center
http://windowslivehelp.com/ -
Hi all
I'm sitting on 10.2.0.4.0 on GNU / linux. I have a complain people on demand, slow queries, he works long enough. I extracted the explain plan command and events waiting for the sessions and system and found commulative db file sequenciial read caused us awaits more. the same query worked fine a day before. not sure where the focus?
++ Query ++ SELECT A.ITEM, A.LOC, MAX(CO1.AFFBILLPR) AFFBILLPR, MAX(CO1.UNIT_COST) UNIT_COST FROM INVOPT_STG.TMP_COST_OCS CO1, (SELECT SS.LOC, SS.MANUF_LOC, SS.ITEM, MAX(CO.ITEM_10D) ITEM_10D, COUNTRY_CD FROM INVOPT_STG.STG_LOC SL, TMP_COST_OCS CO, STG_SKU SS WHERE CASE WHEN SL.COUNTRY_CD_COST = CO.COUNTRY_CD THEN SL.COUNTRY_CD_COST WHEN SL.COUNTRY_CD_COST != NVL((SELECT DISTINCT CO3.COUNTRY_CD FROM INVOPT_STG.TMP_COST_OCS CO3 WHERE CO3.ITEM_10D = CO.ITEM_10D AND CO3.FYEAR = CO.FYEAR AND CO3.COUNTRY_CD = SL.COUNTRY_CD_COST),' ') AND SL.COUNTRY_CD_COST= 'US' THEN 'CAN' WHEN SL.COUNTRY_CD_COST != NVL((SELECT DISTINCT CO3.COUNTRY_CD FROM INVOPT_STG.TMP_COST_OCS CO3 WHERE CO3.ITEM_10D = CO. ITEM_10D AND CO3.FYEAR = CO.FYEAR AND CO3.COUNTRY_CD = SL.COUNTRY_CD_COST),' ') AND SL.COUNTRY_CD_COST = 'CAN' THEN 'US' ELSE SL.COUNTRY_CD_COST END = CO.COUNTRY_CD AND CO.COST_TYPE IN ('F') AND CO.ITEM_10D != SS.ITEM_10D AND CO.ITEM_10D < SS.ITEM_10D AND SUBSTR(CO.ITEM_10D,1,9) = SUBSTR(SS.ITEM_10D,1,9) AND SUBSTR(SL.LOC,1,3) = SS.MANUF_LOC GROUP BY SS.LOC, SS.MANUF_LOC, SS.ITEM, CO.COUNTRY_CD) A WHERE CO1.ITEM_10D = A.ITEM_10D AND CO1.FYEAR = (SELECT MAX(CO2.FYEAR) FROM INVOPT_STG.TMP_COST_OCS CO2 WHERE CO2.ITEM_10D = A.ITEM_10D AND CO2.COST_TYPE = 'F' AND CO2.COUNTRY_CD = A.COUNTRY_CD) AND CO1.COST_TYPE = 'F' AND CO1.COUNTRY_CD = A.COUNTRY_CD GROUP BY A.ITEM, A.LOC------ Eplain plan generated from shared pool +++++++++++ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | E-Rows | OMem | 1Mem | Used-Mem | Used-Tmp| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 11M| 2139K| 3095K (1)| 8192 | |* 2 | FILTER | | | | | | | |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | TMP_COST_OCS | 1 | | | | | | 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | | | | | | 5 | VIEW | | 1 | | | | | | 6 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 22M| 4334K| 3898K (1)| 17408 | |* 7 | FILTER | | | | | | | |* 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | TMP_COST_OCS | 1 | | | | | | 9 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | | | | | |* 10 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 1179K| 1179K| 1210K (0)| | | 11 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | STG_LOC | 155 | | | | | | 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | STG_SKU | 1738K| | | | | |* 13 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TMP_COST_OCS_01 | 1 | | | | | | 14 | SORT UNIQUE NOSORT | | 1 | | | | | |* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | TMP_COST_OCS | 1 | | | | | |* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TMP_COST_OCS_01 | 3 | | | | | | 17 | SORT UNIQUE NOSORT | | 1 | | | | | |* 18 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TMP_COST_OCS | 1 | | | | | |* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TMP_COST_OCS_01 | 3 | | | | | |* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TMP_COST_OCS_01 | 3 | | | | | | 21 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | | | | |* 22 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | TMP_COST_OCS | 1 | | | | | |* 23 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TMP_COST_OCS_01 | 3 | | | | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 2 - filter("CO1"."FYEAR"=) 3 - filter(("CO1"."COST_TYPE"='F' AND "CO1"."COUNTRY_CD"="A"."COUNTRY_CD")) 7 - filter("CO"."COUNTRY_CD"=CASE WHEN ("SL"."COUNTRY_CD_COST"="CO"."COUNTRY_CD") THEN "SL"."COUNTRY_CD_COST" WHEN (("SL"."COUNTRY_CD_COST"<>NVL(,' ')) AND ("SL"."COUNTRY_CD_COST"='US')) THEN 'CAN' WHEN (("SL"."COUNTRY_CD_COST"<>NVL(,' ')) AND ("SL"."COUNTRY_CD_COST"='CAN')) THEN 'US' ELSE "SL"."COUNTRY_CD_COST" END ) 8 - filter("CO"."COST_TYPE"='F') 10 - access("SS"."MANUF_LOC"=SUBSTR("SL"."LOC",1,3)) 13 - access("CO"."ITEM_10D"<"SS"."ITEM_10D") filter(("CO"."ITEM_10D"<>"SS"."ITEM_10D" AND SUBSTR("CO"."ITEM_10D",1,9)=SUBSTR("SS"."ITEM_10D",1,9))) 15 - filter(("CO3"."COUNTRY_CD"=:B1 AND "CO3"."FYEAR"=:B2)) 16 - access("CO3"."ITEM_10D"=:B1) 18 - filter(("CO3"."COUNTRY_CD"=:B1 AND "CO3"."FYEAR"=:B2)) 19 - access("CO3"."ITEM_10D"=:B1) 20 - access("CO1"."ITEM_10D"="A"."ITEM_10D") 22 - filter(("CO2"."COUNTRY_CD"=:B1 AND "CO2"."COST_TYPE"='F')) 23 - access("CO2"."ITEM_10D"=:B1) Note ----- - Warning: basic plan statistics not available. These are only collected when: * hint 'gather_plan_statistics' is used for the statement or * parameter 'statistics_level' is set to 'ALL', at session or system level+++++ System Waits ++++++++ EVENT TOTAL_WAITS TIME_WAITED AVERAGE_WAIT ---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ db file sequential read 11887758 3643542 .31 jobq slave wait 4434 1297399 292.6 db file scattered read 3821415 615568 .16 log file parallel write 778118 476860 .61 db file parallel write 652969 456530 .7 SQL*Net more data to client 93400714 364435 0 PX Idle Wait 1078 208509 193.42 control file parallel write 141212 62082 .44 log file switch (checkpoint incomplete) 323 22567 69.87 log buffer space 786 10051 12.79 log file sync 17816 7988 .45 db file single write 42869 5994 .14 read by other session 13713 5051 .37 log file switch completion 1125 4963 4.41 db file parallel read 756 3951 5.23 Data file init write 18444 3569 .19 cursor: pin S wait on X 3280 3409 1.04 os thread startup 452 2250 4.98 direct path read 4438445 1629 0 SQL*Net more data from client 73118 1613 .02 control file sequential read 291106 1523 .01 local write wait 4707 1169 .25 latch: shared pool 166 954 5.75 direct path read temp 4657234 921 0 library cache load lock 313 753 2.41 enq: KO - fast object checkpoint 5286 734 .14 PL/SQL lock timer 7 682 97.43 latch: library cache 501 614 1.23
Published by: user11983993 on May 18, 2012 11:12+++ commulative events for session +++ EVENT TOTAL_WAITS TIME_WAITED AVERAGE_WAIT ---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ db file sequential read 6224 1978 .32 SQL*Net message from client 20 2 .09 SQL*Net message to client 20 0 0 log file sync 1 0 .17Hello
(1) http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14258/d_stats.htm#i1046561
(2) if there was no FBI created, then most likely the plan slipped by accident. For example, a histogram obtained collected which biased the estimation of cardinality closer to the correct value. The important thing is that, unless you have an FBI (or extended his stats, but to do this, you must be on 11g or higher) you can not count on the coming optimizer with a reasonable plan for queries involving joins
(3) If you are unable to re - create the problem, you can use 10053 event tracing to see the origin of the error in the selectivity of the join of and that fixed it. If you are not sure of how to interpret a 10053 trace file, you can export a test case and post it here (or by mail to me).Best regards
Nikolai -
My MacBook Pro is running extremely slow all of a sudden. Help, please!
My MacBook Pro is in running extremely slow all of a sudden, that way for several days now and I can't understand what is the cause.
Details: MacBook Pro (13-inch, late 2011)
Processor - 2.4 GHz Intel Core i5
Memory - 4 GB 1333 MHz DDR 3
Storage - 500 GB SATA (264.44 498.88 free GB) drive
OSX - El Capitan 10.11.5 version
I tried the simple things such as checking for indexing spotlight, my home screen of the size of the compensation, first aid running in disk utility, etc.. But had no results. Any suggestions would be very appreciated!
Back up all data immediately, as the internal drive may be failing.
When you see a beachball cursor or the slowness is particularly bad, note the exact time: hour, minute, second.
These must be run as administrator. If you have only one user account, you are the administrator.
Run the Console application in one of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first letters of his name in a Spotlight search. Select from the results (it should be at the top).
☞ In the Finder, select go utilities ▹ of menu bar or press the combination of keys shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad and start typing the name.
The title of the Console window should be all Messages. If it isn't, select
SYSTEM LOG QUERIES ▹ all Messages
in the list of logs on the left. If you don't see this list, select
List of newspapers seen ▹ display
in the menu at the top of the screen bar.
Each message in the journal begins with the date and time when it was entered. Highlight date back to the time you noted above.
Select the messages entered since then until the end of the episode, or until they begin to repeat, whichever comes first.
Copy messages to the Clipboard by pressing Control-C key combination. Paste into a reply to this message by pressing command + V.
The journal contains a large amount of information, almost all this is useless to solve any particular problem. When you post a journal excerpt, be selective. A few dozen lines are almost always more than enough.
Please don't dump blindly thousands of lines in the journal in this discussion.
Please do not post screenshots of log messages - text poster.
Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.
When you post the journal excerpt, an error message may appear on the web page: "you include content in your post that is not allowed", or "the message contains invalid characters." It's a bug in the forum software. Thanks for posting the text on Pastebin, then post here a link to the page you created.
If you have an account on Pastebin, please do not select private in exposure menu to paste on the page, because no one else that you will be able to see it.
-
Internet on Windows 10 extremely slow
My Mac Pro has recently been having a strange problem. When I open the boot camp menu by pressing the option key, when I try to select Windows, it displays a BSOD. However, when I leave the default at startup, it works fine... except, however, for the extremely slow speeds (7 Mbps compared to the usual 130 Mbit/s). Does anyone else have this problem? It is a new Mac Pro, so it is not old or anything.
You can run the SMC Reset and NVRAM Reset and test?
Reset the management system (SCM) controller on your Mac - Apple Support
-
New Windows automatic update of August 10, 2011 is our extremely slow laptop. What should I do?
The day before I had defragment the hard drive and do a "Disk Cleanup" after many months. Laptop was significantly faster. Then, there was an automatic update of Windows and now the laptop is extremely slow. Any suggestions as to what I should do next? Thanks to you all!
Hello
· There were several updates installed?
· Have you checked the problem in safe mode?
Check to see if the following is useful.
Method 1: Start the computer in safe mode and see if the problem persists. Report of the results.
Method 2: Log on to the computer manufacturer site and check if you have the latest drivers installed.
See also:
Increase the speed of the PC: optimize your computer, help your PC run faster
-
Original title: searchfilterhost problems
I am running Vista family 32-bit and when the computer is left in standby mode, that it does not start normally, usually ok in mode without failure, but even if his place and it works normally is extremely slow. Having verified the use of the processor, 82 processes running anything meaningful except 50 + % is used by searchfilterhost.exe, this would cause the problem and if so how it can be cured.
Hi Brian,.
You have made any changes to your computer recently?
I suggest you to follow the steps and check if it helps.
Method 1: Follow the link and check if that helps.
The problems of wake the computer from sleep modeMethod 2: You can also follow the link and check if it helps.
How to troubleshoot performance problems with sleep, hibernation and resume in Windows VistaMethod 3: Search for viruses using the Microsoft Safety Scanner and check if that helps.
http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspxNote: The data files that are infected must be cleaned only by removing the file completely, which means that there is a risk of data loss.
Method 4: You can also check out the link and check if it helps.
Ways to improve your computer's performance
-
Windows Vista Ultimate EXTREMELY slow
OK, so I installed Windows Vista Ultimate on my computer, I like it, but it is extremely slow.
The shape of plug the computer are as follows:
AMD Sempion 1.64 Ghz processor
480 MB of RAM
HDD 40 gig
This should be enough to start. I wonder how can I speed up a bit I've run Diskcheck and defrag and Dick Clean-up with very little progress. Just don't have the money for the extra RAM right now either so if there is a way to speed it up without buying extra RAM, I would like to know.
On Monday, May 24, 2010 20:53:04 + 0000, smokeybear2011 wrote:> Ok, so I installed Windows Vista Ultimate on my computer, I like it, but it is extremely slow.>> The card form the computer are as follows:>> AMD Sempion 1.64 Ghz processor>> 480 MB of RAM>> 40 gig hard drive>> Which should be enough to start. I wonder how can I speed up a bit I've run Diskcheck and defrag and Dick Clean-up with very little progress. Just don't have the money for the extra RAM right now either so if there is a way to speed it up without buying extra RAM, I would like to know.It's no surprise that it is extremely slow. You have * way * too littleRAM and you will never get a decent performance with this amount. 1 GBis the minimum necessary for performance * beginning * becomeacceptable for people whose needs are very light (because their)using the application is light). But for almost everyone, is at least 2 GBreally need or that you are satisfied with the performance.In addition, a 40 GB hard drive is * small *. This isn't a performance problem,but unless you do not do much with your computer, you will be runningmore disk space very soon. You should have at least 160 GB or more.--Ken BlakePlease reply to the newsgroupKen Blake
-
Windows 7 is extremely slow to return to the screen saver mode.
I installed upgrading Windows 7 on my computer and everything is fine. However, when the system is idle and past in mode screensaver (with or without a password), the return of the screen saver mode are extremely slow (just a white screen). It is sometimes quick, sometimes it comes back in 3-4 minutes, but most of the time it takes a long time.
The system is a low end, but more than enough to manage w7. It consist of:
Pentium dual core (2140)
2 gig memory
NVIDIA 7300GT 256MI tried to delete the zone alarm security suite, does not solve the problem
thought it was the HP 2610 print software, removed and still happens.
update the bios (MSI p4m900)can someone figure this. Is there something that prevents him to return to the desktop.
Note that, I try to reboot from the blank screen by pressing the windows, right arrow, return. But I think also, it does not address key strokes.
THX
I found a way to fix it! I did this:
1. Press win + r and run msconfig. Go to tools and brand to troubleshoot the computer, and then click Start.
2. then go to system and security and press electricityballance (not sure of the name in English because I have a Norwegian version..).
3. restart your computer.
4. my screen saver was not afterwards, but I gave it to display photos and now it works perfectly!
When I checked the general tab afterwards, it did not have the checkbox to use the... start (a last..) one has been verified and the second has a blue full mark.
-
Windows 7 extremely slow startup
I have an extremely slow Windows 7 startup time. It takes 3-4 minutes to start and then 2-3 minutes before I can actually use the computer. I went into Ms-config and especially disabled services at startup, I got him to start with all my carrots and RAM MAX I tried Glary Utilities and Kingsoft PC Wizard to try to improve the startup time. Nothing did.
My specs:
Motherboard: AMD 760G Chipset
Graphics card: AMD Radeon R9 x 270.
CPU: AMD FX - 4100 Zambezi overclocked to 3.8 GHz
RAM: 8 GB DDR3
Hard drive: 1 TB with about 450 GB of available.
I cannot fail to plug, and Windows works fine, once it gets past the 6-8 minutes to before I can actually use it. It's incredibly frustrating is the slowness. I'm open to suggestions. I have alos repeatedly run Norton anti-virus and found no viruses or issues.
After another reboot, it seems that the deletion of my anti-virus, corrected the problem of slow start. She went from 4.5 minutes to about 1 minute and 20 seconds.
-
I tried to access to the shared both directory a Vista and XP machine via cable connections and wireless to my Win 7 64 bit machine on the part and it is extremely slow to read, but not written. Not only the directory never takes show all thumbnails, and then open a file that is a couple mb in size as a photo takes more than a minute. However, if I try to write the same file sharing, it takes only 5 seconds. This fine all worked until I went from the version release candidate for the final version a few weeks ago. Shared directories exist on another partition for the relocation does not have their effect.
Maybe it helps diagnose the problem... I just make a copy of a picture of 4 MB on the part of win 7 on my win xp desktop and it took about 1 minute. I renamed the file on my desktop and tried to write to the share and it took 5 seconds . Now, it's strange. So, this is the bed that would take forever. The Scriptures are fine, which also explains why my nightly backups on the part of win7 are very good.
I have a machine to hit the share by using the name of the computer and the other using the ip address. Both show the same problem...
I also tried to access files using a mapped network drive.
I can take a 4 MB file and just copy it on my local desktop and it takes about a full minute. However, written the same file or even another file of the same size as the part only takes about 5 seconds.
I ran the Windows 7 network troublshooter last night and used the troubleshooter for incoming connections and he says that it found a problem but that he could not fix and he really had nothing to help me. But I think he sent the information in Microsoft... not sure. Next time, I'm at home, I'll run again and try to put all the gross results that I could not understand in this thread.
I've also updated my driver for the network card and redone permissions and actions several times. The only thing that I can also say that something can highlight, it is that when I was using the RC of windows 7, I don't have this problem at all. It was my first installation of Windows 7. I reinstalled from the final version and all of these files already exist on another partition on the same drive. I just had to move my public and directories user space on the D: partition and share everything. Maybe the new facility with something on the existing structures of the file works well with the new facility of the former? But this does not explain why a new directory and file that create displays the same behavior. I'm thinking out loud a bit to see if it helps that anyone think that anything...
I thought about it!
At least for me, it was a setting in the Advanced tab of the network adapter. I have a Realtek Gigabit network card and one of the places must have been missed incorrectly.
I changed the 2 following settings to "disabled", and he immediately started working very well.
Disabled IPv4 Checksum Offload
People with disabilities large send Offload (IPv4)I have a suspicion that among recent updates of Microsoft for this driver he missed bad... but it was this or the latest driver from Realtek.
Update:
In other research I have narrowed it down to make it just the Large Send Offload value. Is located on "activated" whenever I update the driver Realtek to the latest version. If I then go and set it to "Disabled", everything works fine.
-
System is extremely slow when you try to install Windows XP.
My laptop will Boot but his extremely slow, slow snail.
My laptop will Boot but his extreme slowness. I have a laptop currently has NO operating system on it because I erased the HARD drive because I had a shit installation of Windows XP Professional x 64 Edition (triple). My specs are Intel SU2700 processor EM64T(1 core) to 1 .3GHz 6 GB of Ram and 320 HARD drive. My problem is that my laptop is running very slowly when you try to perform a clean installation of Windows 7 x 64. The model is Acer aspire 5810TZ. I tried to boot WinPE for ghost, which took 45 minutes, I tried to start another installation CD, same result, Windows 7 installation cd starts, but it is the 'starting Windows' for over half an hour. It seems to be without performance problems when you access the BIOS Setup. I tried to start another medium such as floppy disks, external HARD drives and Flash Drives, same result, I have no idea what to do, the sata mode is in AHCI Mode. IM thinking CPU issues.
Hello
I suggest you to contact the computer manufacturer to verify if there are hardware problems. -
LR6.7 buggy / extremely slow on Windows 10 (1607 Version for x 64 - KB3176936 systems)
I updated Lightroom version 6.6.1 version 6.7 running on a laptop running Windows 10 (update of the anniversary). The first thing I tried was to create a panorama of 3 raw images. This operation was a success but it then became virtually impossible to change the image created due to performance extremely slow. The problems I encountered were reminiscent of those I experienced with the initial 6.6 upgrade. (i.e. before 6.6.1).
I have finally returned to version 6.6.1 with performance return to normal. Here's the info system (for 6.6.1) just in case where this assistance.
I wonder when I can expect a maintenance release to fix this.
-David
Version of Lightroom: 6.6.1 [1083169]
License: Perpetual
Operating system: Windows 10
Version: 10.0
Application architecture: x 64
System architecture: x 64
Number of logical CPUs: 4
Speed of the processor: 1.7 GHz
Built-in memory: 8077,7 MB
Real memory for Lightroom: 8077,7 MB
Real memory used by Lightroom: 307.1 MB (3.8%)
Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 263,0 MB
Memory cache size: 80.8 MB
Maximum thread count used by Camera Raw: 4
Camera Raw SIMD optimization: SSE2, AVX
System DPI setting: 96 DPI
Composition of the Bureau enabled: Yes
Exhibition: 1) 1366 x 768, 2) 1366 x 768
Entry types: Multitouch: no, built-in touch: No, built-in pen: no, touch external: No, external pen: no keyboard: No.
Graphic processor News:
GPU Intel(r) HD 4000
Check the supported OpenGL: past
Vendor: Intel
Version: 3.3.0 - Build 10.18.10.4358
Renderer: Intel(r) HD Graphics 4000
LanguageVersion: 3.30 - Build 10.18.10.4358
Plugins installed:
(1) home canon Plugin
(2) Facebook
(3) Flickr
(4) attachment Plugin Leica
(5) attachment Plugin Nikon
Config.LUA flags: None
Map #1: Vendor: 8086
Feature: 166
Subsystem: 124d 1043
Review: 9
Video memory: 32
Map #2: Seller: 1414
Device: 8 c
Subsystem: 0
Revision: 0
Video memory: 0
AudioDeviceIOBlockSize: 1024
AudioDeviceName: SAMSUNG (Intel (r) display Audio)
AudioDeviceNumberOfChannels: 2
AudioDeviceSampleRate: 44100
Build: LR5x102
Direct2DEnabled: false
GL_ACCUM_ALPHA_BITS: 16
GL_ACCUM_BLUE_BITS: 16
GL_ACCUM_GREEN_BITS: 16
GL_ACCUM_RED_BITS: 16
GL_ALPHA_BITS: 8
GL_BLUE_BITS: 8
GL_DEPTH_BITS: 24
GL_GREEN_BITS: 8
GL_MAX_3D_TEXTURE_SIZE: 2048
GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE: 16384
GL_MAX_TEXTURE_UNITS: 8
GL_MAX_VIEWPORT_DIMS: 16384,16384
GL_RED_BITS: 8
GL_RENDERER: Intel(r) HD Graphics 4000
GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION: 4.00 - Build 10.18.10.4358
GL_STENCIL_BITS: 8
GL_VENDOR: Intel
GL_VERSION: 4.0.0 - Build 10.18.10.4358
GPUDeviceEnabled: false
OGLEnabled: true
GL_EXTENSIONS: GL_EXT_blend_minmax GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_texture3D GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap GL_EXT_draw_range_elements GL_SGIS_texture_lod GL_EXT_rescale_normal GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp GL_EXT_separate_specular_color GL_ARB_multitexture GL_ARB_map_buffer_alignment GL_ARB_conservative_depth GL_EXT_ texture_env_combine GL_EXT_bgra GL_EXT_blend_func_separate GL_EXT_secondary_color GL_EXT_fog_coord GL_EXT_texture_env_add GL_ARB_texture_cube_map GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_ARB_internalformat_query GL_ARB_internalformat_query2 GL_ARB_texture_env_add GL_IBM_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays GL_SUN_multi_draw_arrays GL_NV_blend_square GL_ARB_texture_compression GL_3DFX_texture_compression_FXT1 GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic GL_ ARB_texture_border_clamp GL_ARB_point_parameters GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3 GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc GL_ARB_shadow GL_ARB_window_pos GL_EXT_shadow_funcs GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_EXT_texture_rectangle GL_EXT_stencil_two_side GL_ATI_separate_stencil GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias GL_ARB_occlusion_query GL_ARB_ GL_ARB_fragment_program GL_ARB_vertex_program fragment_shader GL_ARB_shader_objects GL_ARB_shading_language_100 GL_ARB_texture_non_power_of_two GL_ARB_vertex_shader GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_ARB_point_sprite GL_ARB_fragment_program_shadow GL_EXT_blend_equation_separate GL_ARB_depth_texture GL_ARB_texture_rectangle GL_ARB_draw_buffers GL_ARB_color_buffer_float GL_ARB_half_float_pixel GL_ARB_texture_float GL_ARB_pixel_buffer_object GL_ARB_draw_instanced GL_ GL_EXT_framebuffer_object ARB_half_float_vertex GL_ARB_occlusion_query2 GL_EXT_draw_buffers2 GL_WIN_swap_hint GL_EXT_texture_sRGB GL_ARB_multisample GL_EXT_packed_float GL_EXT_texture_shared_exponent GL_ARB_texture_rg GL_ARB_texture_compression_rgtc GL_NV_conditional_render GL_ARB_texture_swizzle GL_EXT_texture_swizzle GL_ARB_texture_gather GL_ARB_sync GL_ARB_framebuffer_sRGB GL_EXT_packed_depth_stencil GL_ARB_depth_buffer_float GL_EXT_transform_feedback GL_ARB_ transform_feedback2 GL_ARB_draw_indirect GL_EXT_framebuffer_blit GL_EXT_framebuffer_multisample GL_ARB_framebuffer_object GL_ARB_framebuffer_no_attachments GL_EXT_texture_array GL_EXT_texture_integer GL_ARB_map_buffer_range GL_ARB_texture_buffer_range GL_EXT_texture_buffer GL_EXT_texture_snorm GL_ARB_blend_func_extended GL_INTEL_performance_queries GL_INTEL_performance_query GL_ARB_copy_buffer GL_ARB_sampler_objects GL_NV_primitive_restart GL_ARB_seamless_cube_map GL_ ARB_uniform_buffer_object GL_ARB_depth_clamp GL_ARB_vertex_array_bgra GL_ARB_shader_bit_encoding GL_ARB_draw_buffers_blend GL_ARB_geometry_shader4 GL_EXT_geometry_shader4 GL_ARB_texture_query_lod GL_ARB_explicit_attrib_location GL_ARB_draw_elements_base_vertex GL_ARB_instanced_arrays GL_ARB_base_instance GL_ARB_fragment_coord_conventions GL_EXT_gpu_program_parameters GL_ARB_texture_buffer_object_rgb32 GL_ARB_compatibility GL_ARB_texture_rgb10_a2ui GL_ ARB_texture_multisample GL_ARB_vertex_type_2_10_10_10_rev GL_ARB_timer_query GL_ARB_tessellation_shader GL_ARB_vertex_array_object GL_ARB_provoking_vertex GL_ARB_sample_shading GL_ARB_texture_cube_map_array GL_EXT_gpu_shader4 GL_ARB_gpu_shader5 GL_ARB_gpu_shader_fp64 GL_ARB_shader_subroutine GL_ARB_transform_feedback3 GL_ARB_get_program_binary GL_ARB_separate_shader_objects GL_ARB_shader_precision GL_ARB_vertex_attrib_64bit GL_ ARB_viewport_array GL_ARB_transform_feedback_instanced GL_ARB_compressed_texture_pixel_storage GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counters GL_ARB_shading_language_packing GL_ARB_shading_language_420pack GL_ARB_texture_storage GL_EXT_texture_storage GL_ARB_vertex_attrib_binding GL_ARB_multi_draw_indirect GL_ARB_program_interface_query GL_ARB_texture_storage_multisample GL_ARB_buffer_storage GL_ARB_debug_output GL_KHR_debug GL_ARB_arrays_of_arrays GL_INTEL_map_texture GL_ARB_texture_ compression_bptc GL_ARB_ES2_compatibility GL_ARB_ES3_compatibility GL_ARB_robustness GL_EXT_texture_sRGB_decode GL_KHR_blend_equation_advanced GL_EXT_shader_integer_mix GL_ARB_stencil_texturing
Have you disabled GPU treatment?
I noticed from 6.6.1 to 6.7, in my case anyway, I had the GPU disabled in order to speed up the system. And in your case the HD4000 Intel isn't a particularly fast GPU and has ~ 100 MB of vRAM dedicated.
-
VMware Fusion 3 running extremely slow...
First of all, my MacBook Pro:
Core 2 T9300 2.5 GHz
4 GB memory
250 GB SATA HARD DRIVE
Snow Leopard 10.6.1
VMware Fusion 3.0
When I was with Leopard and VMware Fusion 2.x, the virtual machines run fast, but now they are extremely slow. BTW, I have activated the 64-bit kernel.
I managed to find the reason, it's because the "mds" in the host OS process, is not a problem of the guest operating system. Everytime I turn on my Windows XP in VMware, "mds" will appear in the activity monitor window, and account for about 2% ~ 20% CPU, hard drive usage becomes noisy at the same time. What I could do is just wait, after about an hour, mds will be 'calm down' and my MBP back alone. But, when the next time I turn on my virtual machine, "mds" will appear again...
"Mds" makes me crazy... I tried to google for answers, but no result.
Anyone faced this problem too? Or someone knows how to solve the problem? Thank you!
We found just a bug where in some cases fusion 3 will be a spotlight on every launch search (it is supposed not only to occur once), which seems to be exactly what describes this thread. You can work around this bug open Terminal.app and running
defaults write com.vmware.fusion PLLibrarySpotlightSearchDone -bool YES
Please let us know if that fixes things (or if not).
-
I'm having a problem with extreme slowness. I have read all the post and don't see anything that I could change to correct this situation. I have my music on an external disk file using the FireWire on my iMac. I have the latest Mac os 10.11.1 and the latest iTunes version 12.3.1.23.
I lit the apple music, but I'm not using the icloud or search service
I have 127,88 GB of music on any external drive
At this point, I am considering canceling music apple and past to another service, and I plan to download an alternative product to iTunes.
Is it possible that you and Podcasts iTunes can get their own programs as they do on the iPad and iPhone?
What would be a good alternative to iTunes?
Thanks for any help.
One thing you should do is to run disk utility and test the volume of the external drive to confirm that there is no alteration of the data on it. You can do this by selecting the disk external volume (indented under the Unit) in the disk utility sidebar. Click on the button of first aid , then run it. The corruption of data may cause slow access. Also, if the player is close to being full, which can strongly increase the fragmentation of data, which can cause slow access, especially if the drive has been through cycles to get closer to satiety, followed erase you data in order to free up space, followed by get start near new...
My iTunes Media , also on an external FireWire drive folder, is currently 315 GB (with things that take more space as films, TV series, video podcasts, etc.). I actively use two Match iTunes and music from Apple. I don't feel any slowness. You can do additional tests on your system to determine the cause.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can someone tell me how to get touch 3D to work on the iphone 6 s? He has never worked?
Tactile 3D is on, but it does not work even on the sensitivity test. It is not set to zoom, or any zoom setting is toggled on. I don't have a cover on her screen. I have reset hard. I am at a loss to know how to operate it.
-
Satellite A300 - upgrade to Windows 7 32-bit or 64-bit?
Hello Im not sure what to do. And I can't find you an answer google hollow. I have a portable satellite A300 and upgrade to Windows 7 but im do not know if I need to upgrade to the 32-bit version of Windows 7, I have now the operating system is 32-bi
-
Driver Atheros WPA does not-Portege 3500
HelloI have a Toshiba Portege 3500, but it only works with Toshiba adapter wireless network (WEP, only).Even I tried:http://www.CSD.Toshiba.com/cgi-bin/TAIS/Su/su_sc_dtlViewDL.jsp?soID=553351 andhttp://www.CSD.Toshiba.com/cgi-bin/TAIS/Su/su_sc_dtlVie
-
HP Pavillion E2U20EA #ABF: ethernet card
Hi guys can you please tell me my exact model ethernet card because I broke mine and I want to order a new one. My P/N for my laptop is E2U20EA #ABF. Thank you very much
-
Pavilion 6204y: Restoire records
I spent 5 hours or more talk or talk to HP about this issue and get mad. This computer was built when the drive manufacturers changed format in advance readers. This disc is a failure now and there is not a new drive available from the big record com