Failure of poe SG300 - 28 p

Hello
I am in possession of a switch SG300 - 28 p
I'm having trouble with poe power access point Netgear WG102
Can you tell me if the two devices are supported?
Thank you

Hi Luca, looking at the site of Netgear access point is eos/eol

http://www.NETGEAR.com/business/products/access-points-wireless-controllers/access-points/wg102.aspx#two

He says that the product is no longer available and to look for the WG103.

View product say it's compatible 802.3af

Integrated IEEE 802.3af Power over Ethernet (PoE)

Have you used this front access point? In an environment of production at one point worked with POE? When did you start to use the SX300 switch? Is the SX300 on the latest software? Do you see an indication of the State of the connection of the switch (orange or green light)? The access point works with a power adapter? Do you have any other switch POE try with? You have all different POE switch connect devices that work?

-Tom
Please mark replied messages useful

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

Web Manager SG300 - 28 p and SG300-52 - fans

Hello.

2 questions:

(1) I have a Cisco SG300 - 28 P. I intend to add a SG300-52. Is it not possible to manage the new switch through the web browser SG300 - 28 p?

(2) there are 2 fans in the model of POE SG300 - P. 28, Fans of how they are in the no POE switch SG300-52?

Thank you

There is a tray application tools called Cisco FindIT, which automatically detects all small business products (and other) in a network and their aa shows a tab in the browser. By clicking on one of the discovered elements, it runs directly in the user interface of this product. Details are provided here:

https://supportforums.Cisco.com/community/NetPro/small-business/FindIT?view=overview

The number of fans in the different models is indicated on the data sheet:

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps10898/data_sheet_c78-610061.html

Ivor

Aironet 2802i Radio0 has not started, not enough power POE on SG300-28PP switch

When I restart Aironet 2802i which is powered by 28PP SG300 28 - Port Gigabit PoE + switch, I saw the following message:

[* 13:47:31.8044 26/09/2016] Radio0 has not started, not enough power POE

[* 13:47:31.8173 26/09/2016] DOT11_DRV [0]: set_channel channel set to 11

[* 13:47:33.0109 26/09/2016] DOT11_DRV [1]: set_channel channel set to 36

[* 13:47:33.6506 26/09/2016] Radio1 not started, not enough power POE

Series Aironet 2800 get started guide mentions "any 802.3at (25.5 W) compatible switch port" and SG300-28PP seems to be consistent.

Please advise, thank you.

Dennis

Oh sorry, I got a 2602 in my head, but you use the built-in WLC? I have not had the chance to play with those, but assumes that it will be the same.

Try to display the summary ap and ap 802. 11A of summary config

See you soon,.

Ric

SG300 - 28 p: POE power drops every few minutes

Hi all

We have a SG300 - 28 p which, at intervals between 5 and 30 minutes or more, lower power to all its ports POE-powered and then immediately restores power. Switch logs nothing when this happens other than to record that the ports went down and back up, even with debug logging enabled. Non - POE ports are not affected.

When the problem started there were only four POE devices on the switch and we are far under our power budget. (During the test, I added a fifth device, see below.)

Not all combinations of devices cause the drops occur - specifically, it seems that having devices on ports next to each other causing the drops. When the drops occur, absent the increment of POE devices all counters. I noticed this thread earlier here seemed similar:

https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/2165089

but in this case, he got no power at all in the adjacent configurations, instead of having to drop all the several minutes.

I am running

SW06 #sh worm

SW version 1.1.2.0 (November 12, 2011 time 23:34:26)

Start the 1.1.0.6 version (date may 11, 2011 time 18:31)

HW version V02

I have the 1.2.2.7.6 ready to go new firmware, I will update this when I get a chance to test it. Unfortunately, it's a switch of production, but it's a with relatively few devices to it so far. If need be, I have a sf300 - 48P I can exchange this sg300 ENJOI trials.

Thank you for anything you might suggest.

Here are the details:

-' Phone' is a phone to IP Avaya 4610SW or 5610SW (class 2)

-"Watchdog" is an environmental monitor IT Watchdogs Watchdog 100 (class 0)

-"WAP" is a Cisco WAP4410N (class 3)

All initially due to lack of combination:

GI10 phone #1

gi22 phone #2

dog guard gi23

WAP gi24

would result in the POE power to place on all ports, every 5 to 30 minutes.

I disabled Green Ethernet completely - no change.

And then made the following tests:

1. "power never inline" on gi23 and gi24: problem disappeared

2. 'inline power auto"on gi23 and gi24: problem is back

3 ' power inline never' on gi23 only: problem disappeared

4 ' auto of inline power' on gi23: problem is back

5 ' power inline never' on gi24 only: problem disappeared

6. "power inline auto" on gi24: problem is back.

I left gi23 powered throughout the night and it was stable: it's about 10 hours without any problem.

This morning, tried the following configs:

08:54 - worked fine

IG4 watchdog

GI10 phone #1

gi22 phone #2

WAP gi24

10:31 - added another phone, the problem came back

IG4 watchdog

GI10 phone #1

gi22 phone #2

gi23 phone #3

WAP gi24

10:43 - inappropriate phone #3 to IG11 (next) - problem continues

IG4 watchdog

GI10 phone #1

IG11 phone #3

gi22 phone #2

WAP gi24

11:00 - moved phone #3 to gi8 - suite problem

IG4 watchdog

gi8 phone #3

GI10 phone #1

gi22 phone #2

WAP gi24

11:31 - moved phone #3 article IG 14 - the problem disappeared

IG4 watchdog

GI10 phone #1

Article IG 14 phone #3

gi22 phone #2

WAP gi24

and that's where we left things now are stable for about four hours.

The following products are the config more later (11:31).

SW06 #show power inline

Power-limit based port mode

Nominal consumed power unit power use threshold traps

---- ------- ------------- ------------------ --------------- ---------

1 of 180 Watts 18 Watts (10%) Disable 95

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

Article IG1 Auto search low class0

IG2 Auto search low class0

IG3 Auto search low class0

IG4 Auto on low class0

IG5 Auto search low class0

GI6 Auto search low class0

gi7 Auto search low class0

gi8 Auto search low class0

gi9 Auto search low class0

GI10 Auto on low 2

IG11 Auto search low class0

gi12 Auto search low class0

ig13 Auto search low class0

IG 14 Auto article on low 2

gi15 Auto search low class0

gi16 research Auto low class0

IG17 Auto search low class0

gi18 Auto search low class0

IG19 Auto search low class0

IG20 Auto search low class0

IG21 Auto search low class0

gi22 Auto on low 2

gi23 research Auto low class0

gi24 - Auto on low class3

-watchdog:

SW06 #show power inline IG4

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

IG4 Auto on low class0

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is on - valid resistance detected

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Absent of meter: 4

Invalid Signature counter: 0

SW06 #show interfaces announce IG4

Port: IG4

Type: 1 G-copper

Link state:

Autonegotiation: enabled

1000F 1000 h 100f 100 h 10 h 10f

----- ----- ---- ---- --- ---

Link admin Local advertising Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Local liaison Oper announced Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Oper Remote link Announces no no Yes Yes Yes Yes

Resolution of priority - Yes-

-Phone:

#show power inline gi10 SW06

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

GI10 Auto on low 2

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is on - valid resistance detected

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Missing Counter: 465

Invalid Signature counter: 0

#show int adv gi10 SW06

Port: gi10

Type: 1 G-copper

Link state:

Autonegotiation: enabled

1000F 1000 h 100f 100 h 10 h 10f

----- ----- ---- ---- --- ---

Link admin Local advertising Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Local liaison Oper announced Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Oper Remote link Announces no no Yes Yes Yes Yes

Resolution of priority - Yes-

-Phone:

SW06 #show power inline article IG 14

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

IG 14 Auto article on low 2

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is on - valid resistance detected

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Absent against: 0

Invalid Signature counter: 0

SW06 #show int adv article IG 14

Port: article IG 14

Type: 1 G-copper

Link state:

Autonegotiation: enabled

1000F 1000 h 100f 100 h 10 h 10f

----- ----- ---- ---- --- ---

Link admin Local advertising Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Local liaison Oper announced Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Oper Remote link Announces no no Yes Yes Yes Yes

Resolution of priority - Yes-

SW06 #.

-Phone:

#show power inline gi22 SW06

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

gi22 Auto on low 2

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is on - valid resistance detected

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Missing Counter: 591

Invalid Signature counter: 166

#show int adv gi22 SW06

Port: gi22

Type: 1 G-copper

Link state:

Autonegotiation: enabled

1000F 1000 h 100f 100 h 10 h 10f

----- ----- ---- ---- --- ---

Link admin Local advertising Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Local liaison Oper announced Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Oper Remote link Announces no no Yes Yes Yes Yes

Resolution of priority - Yes-

--also was the watchdog, now empty:

SW06 #show power inline gi23

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

gi23 research Auto low class0

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is disabled - detection is in progress

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Missing Counter: 587

Invalid Signature counter: 0

-wap:

SW06 #show power inline gi24

Port power status device status priority class

-------- -------------------- ---------------- ------------ -------- ---------

gi24 - Auto on low class3

Limit of power (for the mode of power-limit of port): 15.400W

State of the port: Port is on - valid resistance detected

Overload counter: 0

Brief of counter: 0

Denied Counter: 0

Missing Counter: 607

Invalid Signature counter: 3

SW06 #show int adv gi24

Port: gi24

Type: 1 G-copper

Link state:

Autonegotiation: enabled

1000F 1000 h 100f 100 h 10 h 10f

----- ----- ---- ---- --- ---

Link admin Local advertising Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Local liaison Oper announced Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Oper Remote link Announces no no yes no no no

Resolution of priority - Yes-

Other useful bits:

SW06 active spanning tree #show

Spanning tree disabled mode (floods BPDU) RSTP

By default port cost method: long

SW06 #sh worm

SW version 1.1.2.0 (November 12, 2011 time 23:34:26)

Start the 1.1.0.6 version (date may 11, 2011 time 18:31)

HW version V02

Hi Rich, reference this photo I just drew is a rough interpretation of how a switch 24 ports has guts. Each + block represents a processor. The numbers below represent the port Bank that corresponds to the transformer. Of course, MODULE POE is clearly identified. Each module 12 POE ports for services.

I think you have a completely different question. If the POE works for 5 to 30 minutes, it can be a problem of layer 1 (bad son) or a different, perhaps material condition being disturbed. If the switch is at fault, it seems more likely to be defective to a unit of buggy. I did a lot of research on the operation of the switch ASIC, transformer and modules of POE in the cohesion.

Quite frankly, I think you should go to the 1.2.7.76 firmware, factory reset the device and test all the ports you want using the same equipment. If maintaining the POE fall every 5 to 30 minutes and you are absolutely positive, that it is not a question of layer 1 or a configuration problem on your products, can I just replace the switch.

-Tom
Please evaluate the useful messages

Cisco SG300 - 28 p w / PoE unresponsive.

Hello

I am faced with a particular problem when accessing the switch (regardless of the mode - L2 / L3) once I connect to a WiFi router provided by the ISP (local brand). End stops switch in response on the web based console as well as ping. The network remains towards the top but hosts stop answering ping between them as packages. Only way I get the switch control again is by restarting it.

Switch works to its default IP address: 192.168.1.254 and the connected router has a hardcoded IP-192.168.1.1. I got a cable between the router (from its Ethernet port) and I plugged into the router.

Just for fun, I plugged the cable router in the ports of link too, but the switch to stop responding.

Any idea?

Thanking you in advance,

Parth Maniar

Hi Parth, before connecting the switch on the router, have located the switch to a static IP address (even if still default to the 192.168.1.254)? If you connect a router using DHCP management switching IP will change by default.

-Tom
Please mark replied messages useful

GS728TP: PoE fault

Hello

We just purchased a Smart GS728TP PoE Switch.

Unfortunately, when we plug in a new device requiring of PoE, the switch must be rebooted before will recognize (and power) of the new device. It works without problem once this has been done.

I raised a support ticket and Netgear advised me, it must be a hardware failure on the device. They suggested that I return to the vendor.

My initial intention was to buy a GS724TP, but was apparently it is now obsolete and the GS728TP was a direct replacement.

We also have a GS748TP (purchased at the same time), and it works without any problem of PoE.

Has anyone encountered a similar problem?

Maybe I missed something obvious in the configuration. However, I have done a factory reset (and also waited 20 minutes to see if the switch recognizes the device without having to reboot).

Many thanks in advance,
Stephen

Hello

I am very happy to find a topic referring exactly the issue I encountered.
I also received a replacement switch put the problem was always the same (latest firmware from the website, etc...).

After hours of troubleshooting, I discovered that it is related to the switch cascading behind it.

This GS728TP was connected on a GS724TP, both are POE switches, I disabled the POE feature on the two switches on the ports used for them and no problems cascading more.

I don't know if you've had the same configuration, but in my case, it is now resolved!

Kind regards.

Questions of POE with N2048P

We have recently made switches N2048p in our building to replace our aging switches Cisco 3750 G and ran into problems with the POE. We have some devices that work perfectly well with the Cisco switch but will not turn on not with Dell switches. Most of the devices in question is AAstra 6725IP phones, and about a third of them will not be running at all. The N2048 shows "test failure" on the status column with a 'view the inline power '. We are on the last 6.2.0.5 firmware and the latest firmware on the phones. This is also an impact on our building access system as it sinks of POE as well. I contacted AAstra, but they have been so far little assistance. Someone else had the same experience?

We ended up buying POE injectors for phones of the problems.

Connection Cisco SG300-10-Core Cisco 6513 for ShoreTel phones

I have a new ShoreTel phone system will soon. Configure a dhcp, including option 156 scope which is required for ShoreTel to obtain the configuration on ShoreTel phones and in order to get on the vlan correct voice on the phone. I also created a new vlan 112 for the vlan voice. When I plug directly into the Cisco 6513 Core switch, the phone starts fine, it gets its configuration and on the VLAN correct 112.

We have a training room in which there will be a lot of users. I ordered 6 Cisco small business 10port SG-300 POE switches for this training room. I plugged the switch in a cable coming off the 6513 which is just an access port and in the vlan voice I created for phones shoretel VOIP:

interface FastEthernet10/11
switchport
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 112
priority queue queue-limit 20
WRR-queue random - detect min-threshold 1 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WRR-queue random - detect min-threshold 2 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WRR-queue random detection threshold min 3 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WRR-queue random detection max-threshold 1 70 80 90 100 100 100 100 100
WRR-queue random detection max-threshold 2 70 80 90 100 100 100 100 100
WRR-queue random detection threshold 3 70 80 90 100 100 100 100 100 max
WRR-queue cos-map 1-3-1
WRR-queue cos-1 6 4 map
WRR-queue cos-map 2 6 0
WRR-queue cos-map 2 8 2
WRR-queue cos-map 3 1 7
WRR-queue cos-map 3 8 3 6
MLS qos trust dscp
Storm-control broadcasts 20 h 00
spanning tree portfast

When I plug a phone directly into this cable the phone works very well. When I plug a cheap cisco POE switch in I can get 3 phones works very well, but due to the amount of energy needed for this cheap a cisco switch it will give only 3 phones power.

The real problem here is plug into small business cisco SG300-10port POE managed switch. I thought I could just connect the switch to the port configured above right out of the box and plug in phones without a problem. When I plug the switch and start plugging in ShoreTel phones, they do not start coming in and upward and actually had a few phones upward but then finally there is no tone and also later, they appear on the screen as a service not available.

I have to configure a trunk port on a port on the SG300 and the Cisco 6513 for this to work? Also I will need to VLAN configuration manually on the SG300. Looks like that when I just plugged it in to the above configured the port on the SG300 it automatically create the vlan 112.

Any help would be appreciated

Thank you

Dave

Deleted

Problem with switch Cisco SG300

Hi guys,.

I have a problem with switch Cisco SG300-20. After the failure of the switch boots in a kind of mode. It requires

MAC address and serial number to be entered manually for the device. I tried to find information on this mode, but without success.

My question is: what is this mode and how to make the start switch in this mode?

How can I turn on the switch in this mode on purpose if it happens again and I enter the wrong information by accident.

Thank you

Hi Aegx, this is a rare case where the switch basically forget his identity. Although the switch is recoverable, it is recommended the switch RMA.

If you are certain that you have neither taken under warranty, all the information that is asked is on the bottom of the switch sticker. If the thumbnail is is not present you wouldn't able to do this is correct.

In addition, if you make a typographical error, the switch will have undesirable failures that are permanent, such as the inability to update software.

SG300-28MP power inline or stop?

I have a client with a SG300 28MP and they want to be able to stop or turn on wi - fi when ever. Since I'm AMX touch mounted panels in various places, I want to give them the opportunity, via touch screens to enable or disable, or even to choose power switch time by activating/deactivating the POE on network wi - fi (direct connection to the APs only) ports.

Issues related to the:

I should just use ' shutdown/no shutdown' or 'inline power inline never/power auto' orders? What is the difference that this application is concerned?

When I use the command "power inline [auto |]» never]' I get the following switch:

SG300-28MP(config)#int range gi22-24

SG300-28MP(config-if-range)#power inline auto

SG300-28MP(config-if-range)#09-Nov-2013 00:34:12 %LINK-I-Up: gi22
09-Nov-2013 00:34:13 %LINK-I-Up: gi23
09-Nov-2013 00:34:14 %LINK-I-Up: gi24
09-Nov-2013 00:34:17 %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi22: STP status Forwarding
09-Nov-2013 00:34:18 %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi23: STP status Forwarding
09-Nov-2013 00:34:19 %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi24: STP status Forwarding
09-Nov-2013 00:34:29 %LINK-W-Down: gi22
09-Nov-2013 00:34:30 %LINK-W-Down: gi23
09-Nov-2013 00:34:31 %LINK-W-Down: gi24
09-Nov-2013 00:34:32 %LINK-I-Up: gi22, aggregated (1)
09-Nov-2013 00:34:33 %LINK-I-Up: gi23, aggregated (1)
09-Nov-2013 00:34:34 %LINK-I-Up: gi24, aggregated (1)
09-Nov-2013 00:34:36 %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi22: STP status Forwarding, aggregated (1)
09-Nov-2013 00:34:37 %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi23: STP status Forwarding, aggregated (1)
09-Nov-2013 00:34:39 %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi24: STP status Forwarding, aggregated (1)

Just out of curiosity I and W represents in the returned status of LINK and STP?

Hello Vini, if you stop the port, it won't allocate power on pairs.

-Tom
Please mark replied messages useful

SG300 - 10 p of the connection to an another SG300 - 10 p

Please forgive the newbie question, but trying to upgrade/expand my network after the referral simple linksys that I currently use.

What is the right way to connect a second SG300 - 10 p to the system?

current configuration is:

cable modem to router Cisco RV042G. 1-SG300 - 10 p port G9 router port (switch is in another room)

of the SG300 - 10 p I cables (Cat 5) ethernet running throughout the building

in another room, I would add another SG300 - 10 p. can I connect to the ethernet jack in this room to port G1 - G8 or can I connect on port of link G9?

Thank you

Hi Lee, you can connect on any port you like. I recommend you disable POE on each port interconnection between the switches well.

-Tom
Please mark replied messages useful

Cisco SG300 - 28 p - Port security issue.

Hi, I would like to activate the port security on a Cisco SG300 PoE 28 p Switch. I would like to know how this can be done in cases where port is more connected to desktop switches 8 ports and in cases where computers are connected directly to the switch.

Thanking you in advance,

Parth.

This is described in detail in the section 'Configuration of Port Security' on page 326 to 329 of the document Cisco Small Business 300 Series Managed Switch Administration Guide.

The difference between a port serving a desktop switch and the other directly serving endpoint is just the number of MAC addresses that you want to leave.

You have any specific questions?

SG300 - 28 p and SG300-52, what is the difference?

Hello

I have SG300 - 28 p that I use as layer-3 switch. Recently, I ran to switch SG300-52 and even if loading the firmware even does not give me option to do 3-layer switching. For SG - 300 I see options in the GUI to create interfaces vlan under the information section of intellectual property, while SG300-52 option IP information only under the management section.

Please let me know if these are 2 types of different materials and L3 is not possible on SG300-52. If its possible to activate the L3 switch on SG300-52, please tell us what Miss me in the config.

Thanks in advance,

Sam

Hello Smunzani, there no difference in switches aside what is obvious, there POE and it has 52 ports vs 28 ports.

To enable L3, you can console the switch and use the command

"configure the router mode system.

You can also set the mode of the system via the menu if you're using the old 1.0.0.27 firmware (that does not support the CLI textview)

If you do not have access to the console, you can connect to the GUI and go to SECURITY-> TCP/UDP SERVICES and activate telnet then telnet to the switch as well.

-Tom

Convert software SRW2048 SG300

In my view, the SRW series is the same as basic material the SG300 series.

Is there a way to update the firmware on the series SRW using firmware SG300?

The SG300 firmware is much more usable. Also I'd rather have consistency we have the old SRW2024/48 and new switches SG300.

Bob

David,

You are on point.

the 300 series is an Update replacement and hardware and software of the oldest product SRW.

If you have purchased order p/n SRW2008 the updated version here in the United States that's so order p/n SRW2008-K9-NA

We made the change in order p/n for reasons of consistency so that if you ordered SRW2008 in the past you order now SRW2008-K9-xx

where xx is a code region for regulatory requirements and power.

SRW2008 was a linksys product while replacing, SRW2008-K9-NA, is for example a Cisco product that now takes care of switching L3, IPv6 and a bearable CLI and a whole bunch of new features.

SRW2008-K9-NA has a cisco SG300-10 p/n internal.

Refer to the following table a wide for some clarity on this subject.

This table has been copied and pasted from the public announcement of the EOL, to October 2010 referenced in the URL that follows;

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps9967/end_of_life_notice_c51-632243.html

Part number of end of sale product	Product description	Replacement product reference number	Replacement product description	More information
SRW2008-EU	8-port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView	SRW2008-K9-G5	Managed switch of SG 300 - 10 10 Gigabit ports	-
SRW2008MP-EU	8-port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch WebView Maximum Power PoE	SRW2008MP-K9-EU	Switch managed, SG 300-10MP, 10-port Gigabit PoE Max	-
SRW2008P-EU	8-port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView and PoE	SRW2008P-K9-EU	Switch managed SG 300 - 10 p 10-port Gigabit PoE	-
SRW2008P-UK	8-port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView and PoE	SRW2008P-K9-UK	Switch managed SG 300 - 10 p 10-port Gigabit PoE	-
SRW2016-EU	16-port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView	SRW2016-K9-EU	Managed switch of SG 300 - 20 20-port Gigabit	-
SRW2024-CN	24-port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView	SRW2024-K9-CN	Managed switch of SG 300 - 28 28-port Gigabit	-
SRW2024P - TO THE	24-port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView and PoE	SRW2024P-K9 - TO THE	Managed switch of SG 300 - 28 p 28-port Gigabit PoE	-
SRW2024P-EU	24-port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView and PoE	SRW2024P-K9-EU	Managed switch of SG 300 - 28 p 28-port Gigabit PoE	-
SRW2048	48-Port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView	SRW2048-K9-NA	Managed switch of SG 300 - 52 52-port Gigabit	-
SRW2048-AR	48-Port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView	SRW2048-K9-AR	Managed switch of SG 300 - 52 52-port Gigabit	-
SRW2048 - TO THE	48-Port 10/100/1000 Gigabit with 4 Combo SFP switch WebView	SRW2048-K9 - TO THE	Managed switch of SG 300 - 52 52-port Gigabit	-
SRW2048-CN	48-Port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView	SRW2048-K9-CN	Managed switch of SG 300 - 52 52-port Gigabit	-
SRW2048-EU	48-Port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView	SRW2048-K9-EU

Managed switch of SG 300 - 52 52-port Gigabit

SRW2048-UK

48-Port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch with WebView

SRW2048-K9-UK

Managed switch of SG 300 - 52 52-port Gigabit

SRW208 - TO THE

8-port 10/100 Ethernet Switch with WebView

SRW208-K9 - TO THE

SF 300 - 08 8-port 10/100 managed switch

SRW208-CN

8-port 10/100 Ethernet Switch with WebView

SRW208-K9-CN

SF 300 - 08 8-port 10/100 managed switch

SRW208G-EU

8-port 10/100 Ethernet Switch with WebView, expansion Slots

SRW208G-K9-G5

SF 302-08 8-port 10/100 Switch managed with Gigabit Uplinks

SRW208MP

8-port 10/100 Ethernet Switch WebView, Maximum power PoE

SRW208MP-K9-NA

SF 302-08MP 8-port 10/100 PoE Managed Switch w/Gig Links Max

SRW208MP-EU

8-port 10/100 Ethernet Switch WebView, Maximum power PoE

SRW208MP-K9-EU

SF 302-08MP 8-port 10/100 PoE Managed Switch w/Gig Links Max

SRW208MP-UK

8-port 10/100 Ethernet Switch WebView, Maximum power PoE

SRW208MP-K9-UK

SF 302-08MP 8-port 10/100 PoE Managed Switch w/Gig Links Max

SRW208P

8-port 10/100 with WebView and PoE

SRW208P-K9-NA

SF 302 - 08 p 8-port 10/100 PoE Managed Switch w/Gig rising

SRW208P - TO THE

8-port 10/100 Ethernet Switch with WebView and PoE

SRW208P-K9 - TO THE

SF 302 - 08 p 8-port 10/100 PoE Managed Switch w/Gig rising

SRW208P-EU

8-port 10/100 Ethernet Switch with WebView and PoE

SRW208P-K9-EU

SF 302 - 08 p 8-port 10/100 PoE Managed Switch w/Gig rising

SRW208P-UK

8-port 10/100 Ethernet Switch with WebView and PoE

SRW208P-K9-UK

SF 302 - 08 p 8-port 10/100 PoE Managed Switch w/Gig rising

SRW224G4-CN

24-port 10/100 + 4 Gigabit ports, 2 Combo SFP switch WebView

SRW224G4-K9-CN

SF 300-24 24-port 10/100 Switch managed with Gigabit Uplinks

SRW248G4 - TO THE

48-Port 10/100 + 4 switch with WebView Gigabit ports

SRW248G4-K9 - TO THE

SF 300-48 48-port 10/100 Switch managed with Gigabit Uplinks

SRW248G4-EU

48-Port 10/100 + 4-port Gigabit, 2 Combo SFP switch WebView

SRW248G4-K9-EU

SF 300-48 48-port 10/100 Switch managed with Gigabit Uplinks

SRW248G4-UK

48-Port 10/100 + 4-port Gigabit, 2 Combo SFP switch WebView

SRW248G4-K9-UK

SF 300-48 48-port 10/100 Switch managed with Gigabit Uplinks

SRW248G4P

48-Port 10/100 + 4 switch with WebView and PoE Gigabit ports

SRW248G4P-K9-NA

SF 300 - 48P 48-port 10/100 PoE Managed Switch w/Gig rising

SRW248G4P - TO THE

48-Port 10/100 + 4 switch with WebView and PoE Gigabit ports

SRW248G4P-K9 - TO THE

SF 300 - 48P 48-port 10/100 PoE Managed Switch w/Gig rising

SRW248G4P-UK

48-Port 10/100 + 4 switch with WebView and PoE Gigabit ports

SRW248G4P-K9-UK

SF 300 - 48P 48-port 10/100 PoE Managed Switch w/Gig rising

Order details on the 300 series check the following URL;

http://www.Cisco.com/Cisco/Web/solutions/Small_Business/products/routers_switches/300_series_switches/index.HTML-tab-models

Bob, please do not order the older SKU, but order the replacement SKU with a K9 in the p/n. These parts new or updated numbers also come with a substantial warranty, in order to check the datasheet for this information on the warranty.

Best regards, Dave

Cisco SG300-10 Cisco 6513 and Shoretel phones

I have a new ShoreTel phone system will soon. Configure a dhcp, including option 156 scope which is required for ShoreTel to obtain the configuration on ShoreTel phones and in order to get on the vlan correct voice on the phone. I also created a new vlan 112 for the vlan voice. When I plug directly into the Cisco 6513 Core switch, the phone starts fine, it gets its configuration and on the VLAN correct 112.

We have a training room in which there will be a lot of users. I ordered 6 Cisco small business 10port SG-300 POE switches for this training room. I plugged the switch in a cable coming off the 6513 which is just an access port and in the vlan voice I created for phones shoretel VOIP:

interface FastEthernet10/11
switchport
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 112
priority queue queue-limit 20
WRR-queue random - detect min-threshold 1 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WRR-queue random - detect min-threshold 2 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WRR-queue random detection threshold min 3 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WRR-queue random detection max-threshold 1 70 80 90 100 100 100 100 100
WRR-queue random detection max-threshold 2 70 80 90 100 100 100 100 100
WRR-queue random detection threshold 3 70 80 90 100 100 100 100 100 max
WRR-queue cos-map 1-3-1
WRR-queue cos-1 6 4 map
WRR-queue cos-map 2 6 0
WRR-queue cos-map 2 8 2
WRR-queue cos-map 3 1 7
WRR-queue cos-map 3 8 3 6
MLS qos trust dscp
Storm-control broadcasts 20 h 00
spanning tree portfast

When I plug a phone directly into this cable the phone works very well. When I plug a cheap cisco POE switch in I can get 3 phones works very well, but due to the amount of energy needed for this cheap a cisco switch it will give only 3 phones power.

The real problem here is plug into small business cisco SG300-10port POE managed switch. I thought I could just connect the switch to the port configured above right out of the box and plug in phones without a problem. When I plug the switch and start plugging in ShoreTel phones, they do not start coming in and upward and actually had a few phones upward but then finally there is no tone and also later, they appear on the screen as a service not available.

I have to configure a trunk port on a port on the SG300 and the Cisco 6513 for this to work? Also I will need to VLAN configuration manually on the SG300. Looks like that when I just plugged it in to the above configured the port on the SG300 it automatically create the vlan 112.

Any help would be appreciated

Thank you

Dave

Double post.

Go HERE.

Failure of poe SG300 - 28 p

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for