For three buildings with VPN routing tables

Can someone tell me how to configure routing for the following tables

I have three location.  All three have a static public IP address

I need to have a VPN to each location at each location

A = 192.168.0.x

B = 192.168.1.x

C = 192.168.2.x

There are virtual private networks

A to B and a-C

B to A and B to C

C to A and C of the B

So what I need to know, is what are the internal traffic routing tables remains in the VPN and external traffic is routed on the local connection.  I don't want a situation where site A sends internet traffic on to B and then to the world.

Thanks for the help

Basically, the IP address assigned on the security group Local and remote security group who are the only traffic that stays on the VPN.

Tags: Linksys Routers

Similar Questions

  • Help for BBM blackBerry Smartphones & Facebook does not not for 9320 - problem with "host Routing Table? -Virgin

    So, today I received my new 9320 at Virgin Mobile, first Blackberry & love the phone! but I can't use the BBM or Facebook app...

    At first I could not even access the browser while that connected to my wifi... then I phoned Virgin & they helped me to reset the settings on my BB that I could use the browser etc...

    I thought it was problem solved, until I discovered BBM and Facebook, use app world separate service? Anyway, I phoned up to Virgin because I wanted to do this job, they are included in my package & I did not understand why I can't access any of them...

    After a long phone call the problem has proved that the "host routing table" was empty and (according to in Virgin) there is a problem with new BlackBerry receiving these details... they said this isn't a problem on the end there & told me there is nothing more they can do so to click 'register now' and wait for the details...

    24 hours later and nothing, so I hope someone here can help me, make me a BB the whole point is things miss me actually lol and I feel now I'm paying for a phone contract I can't really use it, without any help from my provider?

    Any help?

    Or

    Anyone with a new BB knows something like that recently? Thank you

    Wow... Virgin you gave really there. You see, you PAY for 100% of your services and 100% of your formal support... at the moment, they seem to be or you deliver. Only they have the ability (in fact the RESPONSIBILITY!) to degenerate RIM requiring improved support of cases (from your description, it must be that... with a HRT empty, nothing that anyone here can do). End users have no free path to receive assistance from the RIM at all - only via the escalation. So, what I would do if I were you, is their ring back... but this time do not let you fob OFF... insist that, because you HAVE them, you have a contract with them and they are about to be in violation of this contract - they must solve your problem, degenerate into RIM if they wish.

    Good luck!

  • Y at - it an option for three licenses with an AdobeID?

    Y at - it an option for three licenses with an AdobeID? I have three different machines that I work on, and I want to access all of my assets, libraries, the files in folders cc, etc. on each machine. I would pay extra, I want just the option, I can do?

    Hi Daniel,.

    You are allowed to you only 1 license with 1 Adobe ID.

    You can activate the license on 2 machines but use only 1 at a time.

    Reference: licenses and terms of use | Adobe

    Kind regards

    Sheena

  • [Solved] RV082 - SRP527W site-to-site VPN - routing table?

    Hello

    I am trying to create a VPN IPSEC link between 2 offices. The VPN connection is created, and I can connect but only one way.

    Customers in the Office B seems to have a routing problem. Can you help me?

    Details :

    Office:

    -Router SRP527W.

    -Network client: 192.168.0.0 / 24

    -Internal address: 192.168.0.254 / 24

    B office:

    -RV082 router (behind another router)

    -Network client: 192.168.6.0 / 24

    -Internal address: 192.168.6.253 / 24

    -Internal address that goes to the Router 1: 192.168.5.253

    internal address of the Router - 1: 192.168.5.254

    Page layout:

    Office---> SRP527W---> INTERNET<----- global="" router=""><------ rv082="">< office="">

    192.168.0.254 192.168.5.254 5,253 6.254

    Details VPN:

    Office:

    -remote type SUBNET = 192.168.6.0 group / 24

    -local group = SUBNET 192.168.0.0/24

    -Address ID = 82.127.XXX.XXX

    B office:

    -remote type = SUBNET 192.168.0.0/24 Group

    -local group = SUBNET 192.168.6.0 / 24

    -IP address = 192.168.5.253 (accessed from the Internet through the 1st router with the IP 37.1.XXX.XXX)

    Facts:

    A desktop, I can ping everything in 6.0 addresses.

    Office B, I cannot ping anything in 0.0 subnet addresses. The router itself with the diagnostic page, works of ping 192.168.0.1? But no other ping. Curious...

    The desktop computer B routing table shows the following:

    Active routes:

    Destination network mask network Adr. Gateway Adr. interface metric

    0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.6.253 192.168.6.10 10

    127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1

    192.168.6.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.6.10 192.168.6.10 10

    192.168.6.10 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10

    192.168.6.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.6.10 192.168.6.10 10

    224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.6.10 192.168.6.10 10

    255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.6.10 192.168.6.10 1

    255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.6.10 3 1

    255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.6.10 1 40005

    Default gateway: 192.168.6.253

    ===========================================================================

    Persistent routes:

    None

    Tracert from computers to Office B shows that the packages have arrived at 192.168.6.253, and then it never achieved anything.

    The problem is related to the architecture of Office B?

    See the files attached to a layout of Office B and the routing of the router table to Office B.

    Thank you.

    Enable NAT - T on the RPS and configure the remote ID as 192.168.5.253 in the IKE policy.

    Not sure about the RV and if supporting NAT - T.  It can automatically detect the NAT - T, or need to be configured (in this case, you configure the local identification)

    Andy.

  • No internet access for the connection with the router.

    I bought a router D-Link DSL-2750U and when I connect to the internet it says no internet access even I've updated the MAC address of my router with my ISP, but still no use I use don't win 7. any help on this?

    Hi Chavigny,

    In case you have contacted the ISP provider and verify that the network settings are correct, then try the following steps:

    Method 1:

    I suggest to run the network troubleshooter, and check to see if it lists all the errors and helps you solve them.
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/using-the-network-troubleshooter-in-Windows-7

    Method 2: Update the network driver.

    Steps to update of network driver:

    (a) click the Start button.

    (b) in the search box type devmgmt.msc, and then press ENTER.

    (c) select the network card device and right click on it

    (d) now select Properties.

    (e) in the Properties window, on the driver tab, click Update driver.
    After installing the updates, restart the computer.

    For more information visit: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/Update-a-driver-for-hardware-that-isn ' t-work properly

    Please refer to:

    Why can't I connect to the Internet?

    Previous post: the State of the question.

  • Windows xp routing table problem

    I'm having a problem with windows routing tables on the pc at my workplace.
    These computers are running windows xp sp3 and the problem occurs when I change the default gateway

    the PCs are on subnet 10.181.1.0/24 with d/g 10.181.1.11.
    with this configuration, the routing on each pc table works as expected [for example, it stores a
    Directions to its own subnet [10.181.1.0/24] but no way to other subnets [for example, it will not store
    a road to 10.180.1.0/24, it will simply send this default network traffic
    gateway].

    However, due to a re-design network, I need to change the default gateway for this lan
    to 10.181.1.254. When I do cela something strange happens. the windows routing table on
    each pc begins to store routes to the entire 10.0.0.0/8 network, even if the current
    config on the pc is still a 24 network [for example, 10.181.1.21/24, d/g 10.181.1.254].
    its as if when I change default gateway from the computer, windows, pleasures of the routing table of the
    10.181.1.0/24 subnet as if it were a network 10.0.0.0/8 classful.

    While, right? I can still connect to other networks, the pc is just using a route
    stored in its routing table local instead of sending traffic to its default gateway.
    The problem is that we have a 10.181.1.12 default backup gateway that we switch to
    If the primary gateway goes down. When we test failover to 10.181.1.12 pcs are always
    Send non-local traffic to 10.181.1.11 [because they still have these routes stored locally in their]
    Windows routing tables]. I want to send traffic to 10.181.1.254 [switch a core of layer 3, which then]
    two lanes of traffic to 10.181.1.11 or. [12]

    I tried to change the default gateway to a range of ip addresses and the same problem occurs every time.
    I rebooted each pc after having changed its d/g and the problem remains the same. I tried
    delete all the information off the power the pc ip address, then re-enter with the new d/g, then restart
    the pc but the problem remains the same.

    so, to summarize, when I change the d/g from any pc on the 10.181.1.0/24 subnet, computers table routing begins to store routes
    in its local routing table to the classful, instead of just the classless 10.181.1.0/24 network 10.0.0.0/8 network.

    Has anyone encountered this before?

    Hi biglouie2010,

    Your Windows XP question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the TechNet Windows XP forum.

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/itproxpsp/threads

  • Looking for Wireless-N Gigabit Router with VPN

    Hi all

    I recently bought the WRT310N Wireless - N Gigabit Router and I'm in love! I've updated from an old Netgear router, so now I'm enjoying performance gigabit.

    After buying my SIN, I now use VPN to connect to my NAS when I'm remote.  I started to look at installing openVPN on my NAS, but it seemed complicated and buggy, so who's got when I read that a large number of routers today include built-in VPN features.

    I searched but did not find any Wireless-N Gigabit router that also included the VPN features.  I found 10/100 routers with VPN, but not Gigabit Wireless-N.

    Linksys Wireless - N Gigabit routers with VPN integrated?  If Yes, can you tell me what model should I buy?

    In summary, I like to keep my Wireless-N Gigabit performance and (hopefullly!) the use of the VPN on the Linksys router so that I don't have to worry about the complex and buggy software VPN installs on my NAS.  How can I do this?

    Thank you!

    As far as I know model onlyh 1 that is suited to your requirement is WRVS4400N. Its a Wireless Gigabit router.

  • Roads remain in the routing table after disconnecting from the vpn client

    I am facing this problem for my clients and the easy vpn server.

    My Cisco 3825 has an easy vpn server configuration with an ip pool. When one of the customer disconnects and isakmp and ipsec his deleted by the router itself. The route pointing to the ip address of the ip pool is still in the routing table. This time, another vpn client connects and get the ip address of the ip even pool. But this new vpn client connected is located on a different interface of the router. Thus, an extreme problem happen! A route to 2 next hops is created! So bad!

    Someone else can help me? How can I delete the wrong way?

    Thank you!

    Jason Lam

    It can be useful to upgrade because he accompanied several questions IPP in earlier versions of the code with the roads not removed during the SA goes down, etc.

  • Empty blackBerry Smartphones host routing table, will not register with the network.

    I want to apologize if I put this post in the wrong thread.

    So here's the question. I sent a request to my service provider to upgrade several SIM's have Blackberry service added to them. I asked specifically for them to make sure that the SIM card have been set to BES not BIS. The first SIM card I try to register with the network does the following for me. The phone, before I save it with the BES server can call and surf the internet. Once I have sync the phone with the company's server and I go back outside to check on her send and receive these emails, I try to control the internet and it says that the service is not available. I have 3G (Yes capitol) service and I can make phone calls. The host routing table is empty and when I try to save the phone it just says 'sent message' but I never receives the roads. I wiped the phone and repeat the steps with the same result. I contaced the carrier because all the Google search I did pointed to the carrier but they swear the correct plan is attached. Please if anyone can help me it would be greatly appreciated.

    Hello and welcome to the community!

    In fact, he should persist with the carrier. But first try to remove this BB to your BES, then by the ResetToFactory WIPE to remove the it strategy. Then run everywhere with the BB, ensuring that you can do all the activities of BIS (including filling of the HRT) before activating the BES. If it continues to fail, then you must climb the carrier and BIS get work before you activate BES.

    HRT and the functions of BIS should not be affected by BES, unless there is something in your it strategy that does. It is not very likely but it should impact the devices ALL active BES, not one only.

    Good luck!

  • Impossible to establish a VPN connection with a router configured as a Cisco server using client VPN 5.0.00.0340

    Hei guys,.

    Please help me on this one because I'm stuck enough on her...

    I am trying to connect to a Cisco 3700 router configured as a VPN server by using a VPN client and the VPN connection does not settle.

    This is an extract from the log:

    130 12:48:30.585 07/01/11 Sev = Info/5 IKE / 0 x 63000001
    Peer supports XAUTH
    131 12:48:30.585 07/01/11 Sev = WARNING/3 IKE/0xE3000057
    The HASH payload received cannot be verified
    132 12:48:30.600 07/01/11 Sev = WARNING/2 IKE/0xE300007E
    Failed the hash check... may be configured with password invalid group.
    133 12:48:30.600 07/01/11 Sev = WARNING/2 IKE/0xE300009B
    Impossible to authenticate peers (Navigator: 904)
    134 12:48:30.600 07/01/11 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013
    SEND to > ISAKMP OAK INFO (NOTIFY: INVALID_HASH_INFO) for 200.100.50.173

    I enclose the whole journal extract... The message "BOLD" is quite obvious, you mean, but I'm 100% sure, in the login entry, I typed correctly the group password: pass

    My topology is very basic, as I am setting this up only to get a clue of the operation of the Cisco VPN. It is built in GNS3:
    -2 3700 routers: one of them holds the configuration of the VPN server and the other would be the ISP through which the remote worker would try to establish a VPN connection. I am also attaching the configuration file for the router configured as a VPN router.

    Behind the second router there is a virtual XP machine on which I have installed VPN client...

    My connection entry in the customer is to have the following parameters:
    Host: 200.100.50.173 , //which is the IP address of the VPNServer
    Authentication-> authentication-> name group: grup1 password: pass / / I'm quite positive that I typed the correct password... even if the log messages are linked to a misidentification.

    I use public addresses only, because I noticed there is a question about behind the NAT VPN connections and is not not very familiar to the NAT.

    Another aspect which can be of any importance is that "allow Tunneling of Transport" in the tab Transport to the input connection is disabled

    and the VPNServer router logs the following error message when you try to establish the connection:

    * 01:08:47.147 Mar 1: % CRYPTO-6-IKMP_NOT_ENCRYPTED: IKE 200.100.50.34 package was not encrypted and it should have been.
    * 01:08:47.151 Mar 1: % CRYPTO-6-IKMP_NOT_ENCRYPTED: IKE 200.100.50.34 package was not encrypted and it should have been.

    You have no idea why I can't connect? Y at - it something wrong with my configuration of VPN server... or with the connection entry in the VPN client?

    Thank you

    Iulia

    Depending on the configuration of the router, the group name is grup1 and the password is baby.

    You also lack the ipsec processing game that you would need to apply to the dynamic map.

    Here is an example configuration for your reference:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080235197.shtml

    Hope that helps.

  • VPN router to router with overlapping of internal networks

    Hello Experts,

    A small question. How to configure a VPN router to router with overlap in internal networks?

    Two of my internal networks have ip address 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.10.0

    No link or config will be appreciated. I searched but no luck.

    Thank you

    Randall

    Randall,

    Please see the below URL for the configuration details:

    Configure an IPSec Tunnel between routers with duplicate LAN subnets

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800b07ed.shtml

    Let me know if it helps.

    Kind regards

    Arul

    * Please note all useful messages *.

  • Dynamic VPN for a SAA with IP tunnel

    Hi community.

    Can someone please send a simple configuration for a SAA with dynamic IP connected to an ASA with a static IP address. I read some manuals and how to. But neither works with my ASA. All the how to are older versions of software, I use softwareversion 9.0.

    Do you need a config tunnel and political group for the ASA for dynamic IP and static IP ASA.

    Thanks in advance and greetings patrick

    Hello

    Maybe that this document could help or have you already had a look?

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_tech_note09186a0080bc7d13.shtml

    It gives simple examples of HUB with a static public IP address and 2 sites of TALKING with dynamic public IP address. Cisco ASA and Cisco router:

    In my work I rarely run in the situation where I have to configure VPNS between sites, while the other site has a dynamic IP address. Although the situations that I met were conducted using an ASA5505 as a hardware network Extension Mode client.

    I should really lab installation documents a day before me also.

    -Jouni

  • VPN connects not to Linksys 10/100 4-port VPN Router with ASA 5505

    We are trying to get a new ASA 5505 implemented on our network after the untimely demise of our router from 1841.  One of the functions of the router that we go back to the top and the race is a pair of VPN for employees that we were working outside.  These are site-to-site virtual private networks.

    They worked with the 1841 in place, so I know the other end works.  I just have configuration problems the ASA to match.  I have been through the wizard in ASDM a couple of times, but have yet to have a bit of luck that it connects.

    Attached are the configuration files for the 1841 (with two virtual private networks) and the 5505 (with only 1 VPN in place).  Can someone help me with what I may be missing to get this working?

    A note: I am having trouble with my NAT (another post in the meantime) configurations, but I think they are close enough that I hope that is not interfering with the VPN.

    If I can get one running, the other has an almost identical game, so I should be able to get the second pretty easily.

    Any thoughts?

    Thank you

    Matt James

    Hello Mjames,

    We hope that you do very well, just to confirm the previous post that I answer for you.

    You need to change the NAT 0 configuration

    NAT (outside) 0-list of access outside_nat0_outbound

    This is the rule against the nat for VPN, please change it to:

    NAT (inside) 0-list of access outside_nat0_outbound

    I spent reviewing the configuration of both devices and which seems to be the only problem

    Please evaluate the useful messages.

    Julio

  • What is a substitute for the migration assistant? I tried in vain for three hours to migrate files from a macbook pro to each other so that even if connected with the ethernet cable the computers never see each other.

    What is a substitute for the migration assistant? I tried in vain for three hours to migrate files from a macbook pro to each other so that even if connected with the ethernet cable the computers never see each other.

    You can connect otherwise?  USB or FireWire or love at first sight?  You can connect both machines and start the one you want to transfer to target disk mode.  If your other machine is up and running with an account on it and you just want to move files, you can simply drag and drop the FRO the machine mounted TDM, or you can use the migration wizard.

    Or, if the other machine still starts and runs, you can start both computers and connect to the same wifi network and share the hard drive like machines on the network.  Access them in the finder on the new machine files and drag-and - drop, or use the wizard migration, on wifi.

  • R7000 as router with the router for mobile broadband Internet

    Hey guys. First of all, my apologies for my somewhat inadequate English skills. Secondly, I am brand new to the community, so apologies in advance for any fault :-) Third stop, apologize for having a complete beginner :-D

    So, for the issue: I recently bought a router top mobile broadband 4G (4 G MBR) to my apartment, because of the gap of strength and speed signal very low quality of the cable to the ground on my Street (fiber is to come next year).

    But the router provided by my operator isn't on par with my router R7000 Nighthawk when he comes to reach wifi, wifi speed, number of outputs of LAN and power of the processor.

    So, I want to use my R7000 my router, the internet signal from the air to the 4G MBR, then by cable to the WAN of the R7000.
    In other words; I want to just 4G MBR to simply pass / transfer the internet signal to my nighthawk R7000 router so I can use the R7000 as my router, LAN and wifi.

    How can I set this up?

    Thanks for your help!

    Update: the MBR has been no help at all. As far as I could tell, there is no possibility to bridge or pass-through mode. The R7000, as she does the work. I just put it in AP mode, adjust all the wired connections DHCP/auto IP assign and everything works great.

Maybe you are looking for