Frustration of VPN RV110W
I have two places requiring a site to site VPN tunnel.
I installed 2 routers RV110W at each location.
Trying to make the basic VPN settings, I end up with a non-established IPSEC security association.
I before VPN installation but using Windows Server.
Am I missing something basic?
Thank you.
Hello machater_2000,
Thank you very much for this information. The addressing scheme don't look as if it was a problem with the implementation of the tunnel, unless one of the sites has a private on the Wan address. Newspapers can give us the best information as to why the tunnel does not. Need us the logs on both sides after a connection attempt. I know this may sound ridiculous, but after tunnel configurations, you tried to restart each of the routers and then try to connect again. I have found that sometimes the routers must restart after setting up a VPN for the upcoming tunnel. If you do not feel comfortable here information, you can call 1-866-606-1866 and prosecute with the HWC and they would be able to firmly support networks. Thank you machater_2000.
Tags: Cisco Support
Similar Questions
-
Should I change ip of the router if I use the vpn - RV110W
Hello:
My RV110W ip address is 192.168.1.2. Now, I add a line to vpn clinet adjustment table. When I put the button Save page displays "to ensure the functionality.the good router need to change its ip address to 10.x.x.1. So. I need to know should I change ip of the router 10.x.x.1 order to use the VPN? It is very embarrassing because my devices are all set to the range of 192.168.1.x.
Hello
I'm sorry that you're having problems with your device.
You are right, the router will force you to change the IP address when you try to date a new VPN user, if he always uses the IP address 192.168.1.X, in order to avoid problems when people connect remotely like this subnet is the most used, and if someone tries to connect remotely by using the 192.168.1.X subnet, then the connection will be rejected.
Now, you don't really have to change if you don't want (I have no advice as the function is there for a reason and most likely you will have problems with the connection of users on the same subnet).
What you can do is change the IP address that you want, create all VPN users and then change the IP address to you, this way you fool the router and you can keep your current IP address (even once, this is not recommended)
I hope that was helpful, please let us know help.
-
Configuration of VPN RV110W - please help
First of all, I would like to thank you for all the tips I have ever set up a VPN before.
I am looking for help on setting up a VPN connection to a remote device. I need to be able to connect from a laptop that could be in my office, home, or a hotel room in a city at random in North America. The RV110W will have a static IP address and the device behind him that I need to connect. What I need to know, I have to also take a RV110W with me when I travel to connect through a VPN for this device? Or can it be set up if I can connect from anywhere?
Hi Bill,
My name is Mehdi from the Cisco Technical Support.
Customer support RV110W VPN IPsec and PPTP, and you can connect from anywhere using QVPN client or a Windows-based PPTP client.
Before evrything, check if you have the latest firmware, if not here's the link to download the latest firmware: http://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=283879340&software...
Latest firmware is 1.2.0.10
Here are the steps:
Solution 1: Configure PPTP
---> Under VPN--> VPN Clients enable the PPTP server
-IP address for the PPTP server: IP address of the PPTP server, for example if the router has the IP 192.168.1.1, we can have 192.168.1.200 (must be in the same subnet as the LAN and DHCP server)
-IP address for the PPTP Clients: will give the range of the IP address to clients, in my view, is of maximum 5 IP
-Under VPN--> Clients VPN--> VPN Client configuration table
-Click Add a line and add the user name and password to enable checkbox and choose PPTP
-Click the button Save
Now on the PC to configure the client, here's example:
http://www.strongvpn.com/setup_windows_7_pptp.shtml
Solution 2:
We need to download and install the client use IPsec QVPN QVPN from this link:
http://software.Cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=283879340&software...
-On the router under VPN--> VPN Client--> add Row and do the same steps, but instead of PPTP, choose QVPN
-Also under firewall allow remote management on port 443
now on the client he will ask for username and password for the client who already configured on the router and the server, the server is the public IP address of the router's WAN interface
I hope that I was clear for these steps to configure the VPN, please rate and click on answer to help other client from cisco for more of her.
-
Cisco RV110W supports up to 1 VPN policies
Best regards
I use a router Cisco RV110W to 20 natoinwide of branches with a central site for interconnection, however, although VPN correctly between a branch and the central location it is not possible to add another tunnel in the RV110W to another secondary site (see photo)
In the data sheet RV110W it is said that this router supports up to 5 VPN tunnels, but apparently these 5 tunnels are supposed to establish via the software QuickVPN from a computer.
so: is there a real limit to VPN site to site (router to router) 1 with RV110W?
Thanks in advance for any help!
Please contact Cisco,
The RV110w supports only 1 site to tunnel
Of the data sheet:
1 tunnel IPSec Site to Site
The RV130W will allow 10 site to site tunnels, datasheet below:
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/small-business-...
Best regards
-
Hello
I have a router Aztech DSL1015EW (S) and Cisco RV100w. Here's my setup.
Phone - RJ11---> DSL1015EW (S) - RJ45---> RV110W
-J' tried to build the portable computer remote VPN connection to RV110W (failed)
-Also failefk quick VPN
-PPTP failed
Port forwarding on DSL1015EW
I don't have the public ip address
I use dydns.
What can I do? Please help me.
Fast VPN error message is "bridge not answer do you expect ot.
PPTP error code is cannot estiblishe to the remote host.
Hello
Hi, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I left the community of support to small businesses.
I apologize for your stress, in this case I advise you to check this link with useful information about the VPN fast https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-29399
I hope you find this answer useful,
"* Please mark the issue as response or write it down so others can benefit from.
Greetings,
Johnnatan Rodríguez Miranda.
Support of Cisco network engineer.
-
RV110W replaces WRV210. IPsec VPN tunnel between them?
I have a VPN between two locations using WRV210s at the end of work. Now, I want to replace a 210 with a new RV110W. Can I get both to work together? The config is quite different.
Rod, the rv110w must be on the latest version of the software. The original version firmware did not support site to site vpn.
Site of the tunnel to the other, simply to match the parameters. If you need help with this, you can call the support center, make sure you have access to the pages of each router configuration.
-Tom
Please evaluate the useful messages -
Connection with the client VPN for RV110W problem
Hi guys: I just installed a RV110W router to my small business and I try to connect via VPN from home client. I was unable to do so, no matter what I try. Relevant information:
1. I can connect to the router via remote very well management, so I know that the router is accessible from the Net.
2. internal address of the router: 10.81.208.1
3. active PPTP. PPTP server IP address: 10.0.0.1
4 IP addresses for PPTP clients: 10.0.0.10 - 14
5. two VPN clients added - one with PPTP, with the QuickVPN Protocol Protocol. Both are enabled (and Yes, I triple checked passwords)
6 encryption MPPE and Netbios active.
7 IPSec, PPTP and L2TP all active gateways.
8 VPN client: 1.4.1.2
9. computer: laptop running Windows 7 family (64-bit), with the firewall Windows is activated.
10 home network: 192.168.2.196
It is causing to tear my hair out. What Miss me?
Shannon
Hi Shannon,
I am pleased to see that you're progress.
Shannon Rotz wrote:
I changed the RM port to 443. Unfortunately, now I can't connect to the router via browser, either by remote management or from the local network - I get the usual "page cannot be displayed". How do I get back into the router configuration GUI?
You should be able to reach the GUI by typing https://192.168.1.1(assuming that you have not changed the default IP address) normally once you replace http (port 80) with https (port 443) the internal router web server automatically will redirect you to the https page if you type http. Open your command prompt and try to do a ping of the IP address of the router to ensure that it still meets this address
With regards to the VPN client: Up until I changed the port, the same error message kept coming up, i.e. "Unable to establish connection" (or something like that), with a list of possible reasons why it couldn't connect. Now the message has changed - I'm getting "Server's certificate doesn't exist on your local computer". If I continue trying to connect, then it says "Activating Policy", followed by "Verifying Network", then "The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait?" This is definitely progress, since I never got this far before.
You are a quarter inch offline. If you look at the log.txt in C:\Program Cisco Small Business\QuickVPN Client, in my view, you will see "Failed to ping router remote VPN! This means that your PC is blocking the ping to the router response. Usually, if you look at this point the status of Client VPN in the router (first of all need to remote management) you will see that your user status is "connected." If the router thinks that the connection is established, but the PC does not work. You might want to try another PC at this stage to verify that it is indeed a problem with your PC. This problem is usually caused by the 3rd party software antivirus/firewall blocking the ping response. Microsoft Security Essentials can do this as well, so if you turn it off. If you do not have another PC to test from, call Cisco Small Business Support and ask a technician, try to connect to the lab. You can find the number to call here
On an impulse, I tried setting up a Windows VPN connection, i.e. created a new VPN connection in Network and Sharing Center, using a PPTP client ID that I had created. That connection actually worked, except for one problem: I can't see the remote network. If I could solve that problem, I'll just tell the other clients to use a Windows connection rather than QuickVPN.
Good thought. If you do not see the remote devices, make sure that they do not block VPN connections. (Windows or third-party firewall, antivirus, antispyware) With a connection, PPTP or QuickVPN, you should be able to go to run, type the IP address of the device that you want to connect to (i.e. \\192.168.1.101 ) and see the list of shared folders. After the PPTP connection is established, try to ping the address LAN IP of the router. If it is successful, try to ping a LAN device such as a network printer or a PC. Again, PCs may block ping requests if they have a firewall running watch so for this.
Answer please if you have any questions.
-
Configuration VPN Cisco RV110W.
Hello
We have a new RV100W router. I would like to use it for iPhone, PC and MAC for you connect via IPSec (QuickVPN) or PTTP.
Whenever I go to the VPN configuration, it tells me that I need to set up a 10.x.x.1 network. How can I use VPN without doing?
Thank you!
Hi bndbrennan,
Try to change the IP address, set up your VPN clients, and then restore the IP 192.168.1.1. The reason for which the router wants to change is because there are so many routers out there that have 192.168.1.1. If you always try to connect from one of these routers, the connection will fail. We see a lot of people that use 192.168.2.1 and it works fine.
-
I searched for a few weeks. I'm frustrated so I hope someone can answer this for me once and for all.
If I run a VPN (OpenVpn) with the R7000 - what kind of speeds should I get? Don't 25Mbps down sound normal max?
Thank you.
Well Yes.
-
VPN (PPTP) and mobile broadband - help me!
Hello
I got an SL500 and I use a card SIM of Fullrate, that works well (although when you press 'activate' in the wwan he said my access provider is not supported? but I can't log in, no problem).
But then I have to connect to a VPN to my University to be able to use certain software licenses, it works well... for 10 minutes, then the wwan connection is lost and I can't reconnect. Vista repair functions, ipconfig/release/renew nothing works except a restart used.
Help me! I am really frustrated...
I've updated yesterday - there was an update of hdspa and I changed the global settings for the without thread is not allowed to turn, when idle, and it seems that helped. have used the high-speed and vpn all day and not a single interruption.
Nice!
-
RV082 to RV016 gateway to gateway VPN
Hello. I currently have a RV082 to setup VPN gateway to gateway RV016 between my office and home. The tunnel is connected and I have an installation Avaya IP phone and work. The problem is when I try to open a network folder shared on my server in the office. I ping the server and at the office. I can access some folders on the server using internet explore using the method 'name \\server\folder. But I can't open the files I have premapped. When I'm on the network in the office everything is ok. When I get home I get the message "path not found network". I tried to remap and go home empty-handed. Initially, I thought that maybe it's a setting on my server but rejected since I can ping and access through the method of EI. Any ideas? I get very frustrated here! Thank you.
I thought about it by chance after reading several other posts of similar problems. Under the gateway to gateway VPN configuration, you must navigate to the tab advanced for the IPSec configuration. Both options of NAT Traversal and broadcast NetBIOS must be enabled at both ends and it works!
Thanks for your help.
-
Best regards
Currently I have a RV016 and a router RV110W to try to connect to one of our branches (retail of clothing) with the central site, we managed to install and VPN works very well, but we have more than 19 stores throughout the country.
In stores, we can have 2 to 8 computers such as point of sale, one of them acting as server to our system, this server is required to connect to the main server in the central office.
My question is: we have received some tips from people who say that these facilities are too small to connect to our 20 stores, anyone know if this is true? These RV series are suitable for this amount of connection of branches?
Thanks in advance for any help!
Hello
The ASA5506 is a very good security device and give you a lot more security. The RV016 isn't a security feature, but it has a firewall. Less flexible, less features.
You need the ASA5506-x w / power of fire and more security license. With the license of security Plus the 5506 do support that 10 IPsec VPN tunnels. With the license, it supports 50.
The broadband VPN (speed), however, is substantially the same between the ASA and the RV016. ASA get 100 Mbps VPN and the RV016 get 97 Mbit/s throughput. very similar.
The neck of the bottle is actually with the RV110w on the remote site. There only get 5 Mbps VPN throughput. You should consider the RV130W with 50 Mbps VPN throughput.
Kind regards
-
We have an ASA 5505 configured for EZ remote VPN. If assign us a static ip address for the external interface in our test lab, it remains standing. When we go out on the remote site, which has a FiOS connection with dhcp for the external interface address, it gives every hour. When we put a pix there, it remains standing. At sh crypto isakmp his on the side remote shows an AM_WAIT_MSG2 (when the SAA is in place and the tunnel fails) I have to restart the SAA, and then the tunnel will come back to the top. For an hour. Also has anyone seen this type of behavior? It has been very frustrating and I have a tac case, but they said that configuration seems fine.
Today is your lucky day. I had this problem with my ASA5505 on my FiOS connection. Apparently Verizon ping your device before it will allow you to request or renew your IP address. When your ASA comes first in line they can it ping because you have ICMP enabled outside and the VPN tunnel is not. Once the tunnel is established and you do not use the split tunneling, they can't ping your ASA. If you drop the tunnel the dhcp lease does not expire. What I had to do was the tunneling split on the vpn group that I used for the ASA and enable ICMP on the external interface. After that the ASA would stay for good.
-
AnyConnect licenses for Cisco RV110W
Hi all
Thank you in advance for taking the time to respond - I tried for the last hour and seek more information on the AnyConnect client for an entry level firewall - CiscoRV110W, but I'm still confused.
To say simple things, my questions are:
If I buy this firewall of entry-level VPN connections supports 5 + 5, can users download the AnyConnect client and connect to the VPN for free (once it is set up), or do I have to pay extra for the AnyConnect licenses? How much would that cost?
My experience with AnyConnect has been so far limited to the end user, use it to connect to the network through the VPN at work, but now I take into account set up something similar for a small office with a few teleworkers.
Connection of the device:
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/RV110W-wireless...
I already read the FAQ for AnyConnect, but it is still is not clear.
Thank you for your time!
Hi mmihai.toma,
As far as I know, is not supported on devices RV Anyconnect. If you want to use Anyconnect you must have a Firewall ASA or IOS, router IO - XE.
According to the documentation it looks like the only VPN options for the device of RV are: quick VPN, Site to Site, and PPTP.
It may be useful
-Randy-
-
I'm trying to get a site to site VPN working between two routers RV110W, obviously in different places with different public IPs and different internal addressed IP networks.
For some reason, the IPsec Security Association gets 'established', but no traffic will travel between the two.
I use the "basic VPN setup" on routers and type in their respective information below.
Public IP have been replaced by x.x.x.x.
Router A:
Connection: - name -.
Key: - PSK-
IP / domain FULL: - public IP address of the remote site.
Local WAN: - local WAN.
Remote LAN: 10.151.238.0
Remote mask: 255.255.255.0
Local NETWORK: 10.151.237.0
Local mask: 255.255.255.0
Router b:
Connection: - name -.
Key: - PSK-
IP / domain FULL: - public IP address of the remote site.
Local WAN: - local WAN.
Remote LAN: 10.151.237.0
Remote mask: 255.255.255.0
Local NETWORK: 10.151.238.0
Local mask: 255.255.255.0
I am very confused.
Site A:
Public IP address
10.151.237.0/24 network
Cisco VPN Firewall RV110W
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'x.x.x.x\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R2 of State STATE_MAIN_R3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, Security Association established ISAKMP {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #5: the proposed peer: 10.151.237.0/24:0/0-> 10.151.238.0/24:0/0
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: response to a proposal of fast Mode {msgid:6ecb39e8}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: us: 10.151.237.0/24===x.x.x.x
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: them: x.x.x.x===10.151.238.0/24
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R0 of State STATE_QUICK_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R1 of State STATE_QUICK_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #6: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec Security Association established the {-online 0x2fadc90d ESP tunnel mode<0xa6393cfc xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:14 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I2 of State STATE_MAIN_I3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expect MR3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.164.121\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I3 of State STATE_MAIN_I4
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #3: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: quick launch Mode PSK + ENCRYPT + TUNNEL + TOP {using isakmp proposal d = AES (12) msgid:0779895 #3 _128-SHA1 (2) _1024 pfsgroup = No. - pfs}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: transition of State STATE_QUICK_I1 of State STATE_QUICK_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0x8d260557 mode<0xad4da835 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #7: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0x8d260557 mode<0xad4da835 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:53 RV110W kern.debug wl0.0: IEEE 802.11 Association request for e0: c9:7 has: 7 a: 3d:2 b b8:62:1f:51:ad:a9 BSSID
2013-07-11 16:16:54 RV110W kern.info wl0.0: e0:c9:7 a: 7 a: 3d:2 b IEEE 802.11 STA associated BSSID b8:62:1f:51:ad:a9
2013-07-11 16:16:54 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [2541]: received REQUEST from E0:C9:7 A: 7 A: 3D:2 B
2013-07-11 16:16:54 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [2541]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.237.5
' 2013-07-11 16:17:23 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [30287]: \"cisco\ ' #4: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_R2
2013-07-11 16:17:43 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [2541]: INFORMATION from 38:60:77:13:C0:48
Site B:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public IP address
10.151.238.0/24 network
Cisco VPN Firewall RV110W
2013-07-11 16:13:11 RV110W daemon.info httpd [22952]: Administrator 10.151.238.201 logined
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. PFKEY open, create socket 19
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: 1success is enabled
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: NAT-Traversal port 4500 floating off setting
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: port floating nat_t activation criteria = 0/port_float = 1
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: including NAT-Traversal patch (Version 0.6 c) [disabled]
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC_SSH of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_SERPENT_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_AES_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_BLOWFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_512 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_256 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: commissioning 1 cryptographic support
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6789]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: begun assistance pid = 6789 (fd:5)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface using Linux 2.6 IPsec on 2.6.22 code (experimental code)
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: Ok (ret = 0) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change directory \'/etc/ipsec.d/crls\'
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: empty directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: listen to IKE messages
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface ppp0/ppp0 10.151.238.200:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface br0/br0 10.151.238.1:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface eth1: 0 / eth1: 0 127.0.0.3:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface adding vlan2/vlan2 x.x.x.x:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. PFKEY 18 failed: no such file or directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: forget the secrets
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ': termination of SAs by using this connection
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: removal of State (STATE_MAIN_I2)
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\": removal of connection
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I2 of State STATE_MAIN_I3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expect MR3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.165.2\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I3 of State STATE_MAIN_I4
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: quick launch Mode PSK + ENCRYPT + TUNNEL + TOP {using isakmp #2 msgid:6ecb39e8 = AES proposal (12) _128-SHA1 (2) _1024 pfsgroup = No. - pfs}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_QUICK_I1 of State STATE_QUICK_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.165.2\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R2 of State STATE_MAIN_R3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, Security Association established ISAKMP {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: the proposed peer: 10.151.238.0/24:0/0-> 10.151.237.0/24:0/0
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: respond to the Quick Mode proposal {msgid:0779895 d}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: us: 10.151.238.0/24===x.x.x.x
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: them: x.x.x.x===10.151.237.0/24
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: keep refhim = 4294901761 to the course to generate a new key
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R0 of State STATE_QUICK_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R1 of State STATE_QUICK_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec Security Association established the {-online 0xad4da835 ESP tunnel mode<0x8d260557 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:23 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:16:43 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.debug wl0.0: IEEE 802.11 Association request a BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72 cc:af:78:60:9e:9
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.info wl0.0: cc:af:78:60:9e:9 a IEEE 802.11 STA associated BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 A
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.105
2013-07-11 16:18:52 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:20:15 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST for 00:01:80:5 C: 98:B9
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.101
2013-07-11 16:13:11 RV110W daemon.info httpd [22952]: Administrator 10.151.238.201 logined
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. PFKEY open, create socket 19
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W user.debug syslog. recv pfkey register address
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: 1success is enabled
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: NAT-Traversal port 4500 floating off setting
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: port floating nat_t activation criteria = 0/port_float = 1
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: including NAT-Traversal patch (Version 0.6 c) [disabled]
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC_SSH of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_TWOFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_SERPENT_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_AES_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): OAKLEY_BLOWFISH_CBC of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_512 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_hash(): OAKLEY_SHA2_256 of activation: Ok (ret = 0)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: commissioning 1 cryptographic support
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6789]: using/dev/urandom as a source of random entropy
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: begun assistance pid = 6789 (fd:5)
2013-07-11 16:16:11 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface using Linux 2.6 IPsec on 2.6.22 code (experimental code)
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: Ok (ret = 0) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): activation
: FAILURE (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc(): WARNING: enc alg = 0 not found in constant .c: oakley_enc_names
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_add(): ERROR: algorithm already exists
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: ike_alg_register_enc():
activation: FAILED (ret = - 17) 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change path to the \'/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts\ directory '
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: change directory \'/etc/ipsec.d/crls\'
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: warning: empty directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: listen to IKE messages
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface ppp0/ppp0 10.151.238.200:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface br0/br0 10.151.238.1:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface eth1: 0 / eth1: 0 127.0.0.3:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: interface adding vlan2/vlan2 x.x.x.x:500
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: adding the interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. PFKEY 18 failed: no such file or directory
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: forget the secrets
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: secrets of \"/tmp/ipsec_secrets/_qv.secret\ loading.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:12 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ': termination of SAs by using this connection
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #1: removal of State (STATE_MAIN_I2)
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\": removal of connection
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: added connection description \"cisco\.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: launch the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I1 of State STATE_MAIN_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, waiting for MR2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I2 of State STATE_MAIN_I3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expect MR3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: \'96.2.165.2\'
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: transition of State STATE_MAIN_I3 of State STATE_MAIN_I4
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP Security Association established {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #2: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: quick launch Mode PSK + ENCRYPT + TUNNEL + TOP {using isakmp #2 msgid:6ecb39e8 = AES proposal (12) _128-SHA1 (2) _1024 pfsgroup = No. - pfs}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: transition of State STATE_QUICK_I1 of State STATE_QUICK_I2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
' 2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.info pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #3: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, Security Association established IPsec ESP tunnel {-online 0xa6393cfc mode<0x2fadc90d xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:13 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Openswan (this version) 2.6.21] code
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: received vendor payload [Dead Peer Detection] code
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: meet the main Mode
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R0 of State STATE_MAIN_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expected MI2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R1 of State STATE_MAIN_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, waiting for MI3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: hand mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '\x.x.x.x\ '.
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: transition of State STATE_MAIN_R2 of State STATE_MAIN_R3
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, Security Association established ISAKMP {auth = OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY = prf = oakley_sha group = modp1024 aes_128 encryption}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #4: the proposed peer: 10.151.238.0/24:0/0-> 10.151.237.0/24:0/0
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: respond to the Quick Mode proposal {msgid:0779895 d}
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: us: 10.151.238.0/24===x.x.x.x
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: them: x.x.x.x===10.151.237.0/24
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: keep refhim = 4294901761 to the course to generate a new key
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R0 of State STATE_QUICK_R1
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: Dead Peer Detection (RFC 3706): enabled
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: transition of State STATE_QUICK_R1 of State STATE_QUICK_R2
' 2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: \"cisco\ ' #5: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec Security Association established the {-online 0xad4da835 ESP tunnel mode<0x8d260557 xfrm="AES_128-HMAC_SHA1" natoa="none" natd="none" dpd="">
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. * pfkey received message
2013-07-11 16:16:17 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]. Pluto: pfkey fd is 19
2013-07-11 16:16:23 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:16:43 RV110W authpriv.debug pluto [6788]: package x.x.x.x:500: message from the phase 1 part of an unknown Exchange
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.debug wl0.0: IEEE 802.11 Association request a BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72 cc:af:78:60:9e:9
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W kern.info wl0.0: cc:af:78:60:9e:9 a IEEE 802.11 STA associated BSSID b8:62:1f:51:b1:72
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 A
2013-07-11 16:18:49 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.105
2013-07-11 16:18:52 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:20:15 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: INFORMATION from CC:AF:78:60:9E:9 a.
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: received REQUEST for 00:01:80:5 C: 98:B9
2013-07-11 16:23:03 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd [789]: sending acknowledgement to 10.151.238.101
Please help if you can.
Aaron,
When the tunnel is up, you can ping the LAN IP of the remote router? What type of traffic you are trying to send? What equipment and what device?
If you are trying to reach a PC through the tunnel, be sure that there is no firewall software blocking traffic between a different LAN. Repeatedly PCs will respond to connections on the same network, but not to a different subnet.
Please give us more information about what devices are involved and what they try to do.
-Marty
Maybe you are looking for
-
WORD DOCUMENT SAVED IN APRIL KEEPS OPENING WHEN I OPEN WORD? How can I GET RID of IT?
I NEED TO GET RID OF THE DOCUMENT WHICH KEEPS OPENING UPWARD WHEN I OPENED UPWARD THE DOCUMNET WORD DID I SAVE BAD
-
How to configure windows defeder on automatic.
get an error message sayng: Windows defender: application failed to initialize. 0x800106ba... rebooted but problem still not solved. As mentioned in your site has tried to do so: click Start > type services in the start search box, and then click Ser
-
Error message: iTunes has stopped working, trying to open iTunes
original title: i-tunes error Whenever I try to open itunes a message appears that says that it has stopped working. How can I fix it? Is there a way to fix it without uninstall itunes and lose all my previously downloaded music?
-
Want 4500: documents disappear from the print queue
Want to 4500 and problem of Windows 8 Test print from computer works with HP Printer Wizard. However, printing documents from applications fails. Documents go in the queue and then disappear - just like they should be ended at printing. Only the indi
-
JavaFX 8 - way reasonable to make a canvas to fill its parent
This here is the essence of a problem with a canvas that I have right nowpublic class Test extends the Application{Public Shared Sub main (String [] args){Launch (args);}@Overridepublic void start (point primaryStage){TabPane tabPane = new TabPane();