Fusion of single table

Similar Questions

• multiple to single table replication

  Hello
  
  Is there a way we can replicate multiple tables at source on a single table to the target.
  
  example: join table A and B on the source and put it in the table C.
  
  Thank you!

  Yes it is possible. OGG can be used to get the data from the tables of the source and go in a single target table. But keep in mind if you are data fusion then PK conflict should be avoided otherwise, you can get any data problems.

  -Koko

• Dreamweaver several graphs in single table cell

  Dreamweaver is having problems when I try to combine multiple charts in a single table cell. Some are separated by two end just "" entries, while others do not accept these separators. Pleas you show me the right way to handle this.

  Jack,

  • Tables should not be used for web page layouts.
  • Tables for tabular data such as spreadsheets and graphics only.
  • Today, we use an external CSS file for the layout, typography and other styles.

  Please show us what you are trying to do by copying and sticky code in a reply from the web forum.

  Nancy O.

• How to restore a single table from a DP Export to a different pattern?

  Environment:
  
  Oracle 11.2.0.3 EE on Solaris
  
  I was looking at documentation when importing DP trying to find the correct syntax to import a single table of an RFP to a different schema export.
  
  So I want to load the table User1. Table1 in USER2. Table1 a DP Export.
  
  Looking at the REMAP_TABLE options:

  REMAP_TABLE=[schema.]old_tablename[.partition]:new_tablename
  
  OR
  
  REMAP_TABLE=[schema.]old_tablename[:partition]:new_tablename

  I can't see where to specify the name of the target schema. Examples were the new table name residing in the same pattern with just a new name.
  
  I looked at the REMAP_SCHEMA but the docs say matter the entire schema in the new schema and I want only one 1 table.
  
  All suggestions are welcome!
  
  -gary

  I thought I tried this combination and it seemed to me that the REMAP_SCHEMA somehow too rolled TABLES = parameter > and started to load all the objects.

  If it does not fail (and it shouldn't) then please post details here and I'll see what happens.

  Let me back in the tray to sand and try again. I admit I was a bit of a rush when I did the first time.

  We are all in a hurry, no worries. If it fails, please post the details and the log file.

  Does make any sense that a parameter would be substitute another?

  No, this should never happen. We have tons of audits to ensure that labour cannot have several meanings. For example, you can not say

  Full schemas = y = foo - what you want, or a full export list export schema, etc.

  Your suggestion was the first thing that I thought would work.

  It should work. If this isn't the case, send the log with the command and the results file.

  Dean
  Thanks again for the help and stay tuned for my new attempt.

  -gary

• single table hash clusters

  I created a hash cluster single table like this:
  
  create tablespace mssm datafile 'c:\app\mssm01.dbf' size 100 m
  Segment space management manual;
  
  
  create the cluster hash_cluster_4k
  (id number (2))
  size 8192 single hash table is id hashkeys 4 tablespace mssm;
  
  --Also created a table cluster with the line size such as single record corresponds to a block and inserted 5 records each with a separate key value
  
  
  CREATE TABLE hash_cluster_tab_8k
  (number (2) id,)
  txt1 tank (2000).
  txt2 tank (2000).
  tank (2000) txt3
  )
  CLUSTER hash_cluster_8k (id);
  
  
  Begin
  because loop me in 1.5
  Insert in the values of hash_cluster_tab_8k (i, 'x', 'x', 'x');
  end loop;
  end;
  /
  exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats (WATERFALL of the USER 'HASH_CLUSTER_TAB_8K' = > true);
  
  
  Now, if I try to access the folder with id = 1 - it shows 2 I / O (cr = 2) instead of the single e/s as provided in a hash cluster.
  
  
  
  Rows Row Source operation
  ------- ---------------------------------------------------
  1 ACCESS HASH_CLUSTER_TAB_8K HASH TABLE (cr = 2 pr = 0 pw = time 0 = 0 US)
  
  
  If I run the query, even after the creation of a unique index on hash_cluster_tab (id), the execution plan specifies access hash and single e/s (cr = 1).
  
  This means that for a single e/s in a single table hash cluster, we create a unique index? It will not create an additional burden to maintain an index?
  
  What is the second I/o necessary for in the case where a unique index is absent?
  
  I would be very grateful if gurus could explain this behavior.
  
  Thanks in advance...

  user12288492 wrote:
  I ran the query with all 5 id values and the results have been more confusing.

  During the first inning, I had VC = 2 for two values of keys, the Czech Republic rest = 1
  During the second inning, I = 2 for a key value, the Czech Republic cr rest = 1
  In the third set, I had VC = 1 for all values of keys

  The effects vary depending on the number of previous runs and the number of times you reconnect.
  The extra CR is a cleansing of the block effect. If you check the access of the buffer (events 10200-10203), then you can see the details. Simplistically, if you create your data, then connect and interrogate one of the lines (but not id = 5, because that will be cleaned on the collection of statistics) you should be able to see the following numbers:

  cleanouts only - consistent read gets                                        1
  immediate (CR) block cleanout applications                                   1
  commit txn count during cleanout                                             1
  cleanout - number of ktugct calls                                            1
  Commit SCN cached                                                            1
  redo entries                                                                 1
  redo size                                                                   80
  

  On the first block visited, Oracle made a visit to buffer to untangle a YVERT cleaning (ktugct - get the commit time). This cleans up the block and caches the acquired RCS. The rest of the blocks that visit you in the same session should not be cleaned because the session can use the updated SNA caching to avoid needing a cleanup operation. Finally all the blocks will have been cleaned up (which means that they will be written to the disk) and the extra CR stops happening.

  There is a little quirk - drain plug seems to apply to the format block calls - and I do not understand why this was did not each row inserted thereafter.

  Concerning
  Jonathan Lewis

• Repetition of groups nested in a single table - model RTF

  Hi all
  
  I have a little problem with RTF models. I try to use 2 recurring groups within a single table, but everything I'm not get data for the fields of the outer loop, or still getting only one record of the loop internal.
  
  It is a model of report of cash requirements. My expandable outside group is G_VENDOR and internal is G_INVOICE. I'm at the stage where I pasted the table with the G_INVOICE details in another table (with the NAME of the SELLER in the first field). This has however a drawback - it is not to repeat the name of the seller if there is more than one G_INVOICE in G_VENDOR. I don't want tables repeated for each provider, one with all the data.
  
  I had SR Oracle open, but they seem not to be very useful, makes me think it is a bug and not fixed will never be. I know that the XML flatenning would be an option, but I don't want be to redevelop all alone I need template for reports.
  
  Someone has an idea?
  
  Concerning
  Piotr

  Hi Piotr,

  Ideally you would be that flatten, but if you are inside the loop of invoice you can still access the fields of the outer loop by changing the form field and by prefixing with... /.

  for example becomes

  Kind regards

  Robert

• How to combine the large number of tables of pair key / value in a single table?

  I have a pair key / value tables of 250 + with the following features
  
  (1) keys are unique within a table but may or may not be unique in the set of tables
  (2) each table has about 2 million lines
  
  What is the best way to create a single table with all unique key-values of all these paintings? The following two queries work up to about 150 + tables
  

  with
    t1 as ( select 1 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
            select 2 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
            select 3 as key, 'a2' as val from dual )
  , t2 as ( select 2 as key, 'b1' as val from dual union all
            select 3 as key, 'b2' as val from dual union all
            select 4 as key, 'b3' as val from dual )
  , t3 as ( select 1 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
            select 3 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
            select 5 as key, 'c2' as val from dual )
  select coalesce(t1.key, t2.key, t3.key) as key
  ,      max(t1.val) as val1
  ,      max(t2.val) as val2
  ,      max(t3.val) as val3
  from t1
  full join t2 on ( t1.key = t2.key )
  full join t3 on ( t2.key = t3.key )
  group by coalesce(t1.key, t2.key, t3.key)
  /
  
  with
    master as ( select rownum as key from dual connect by level <= 5 )
  , t1 as ( select 1 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
            select 2 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
            select 3 as key, 'a2' as val from dual )
  , t2 as ( select 2 as key, 'b1' as val from dual union all
            select 3 as key, 'b2' as val from dual union all
            select 4 as key, 'b3' as val from dual )
  , t3 as ( select 1 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
            select 3 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
            select 5 as key, 'c2' as val from dual )
  select m.key as key
  ,      t1.val as val1
  ,      t2.val as val2
  ,      t3.val as val3
  from master m
  left join t1 on ( t1.key = m.key )
  left join t2 on ( t2.key = m.key )
  left join t3 on ( t3.key = m.key )
  /

  A couple of questions, then a possible solution.

  Why the hell you have 250 + tables pair key / value?

  Why the hell you want to group them in a table containing one row per key?

  You could do a pivot of all the tables, not part. something like:

  with
    t1 as ( select 1 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
            select 2 as key, 'a1' as val from dual union all
            select 3 as key, 'a2' as val from dual )
  , t2 as ( select 2 as key, 'b1' as val from dual union all
            select 3 as key, 'b2' as val from dual union all
            select 4 as key, 'b3' as val from dual )
  , t3 as ( select 1 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
            select 3 as key, 'c1' as val from dual union all
            select 5 as key, 'c2' as val from dual )
  select key, max(t1val), max(t2val), max(t3val)
  FROM (select key, val t1val, null t2val, null t3val
        from t1
        union all
        select key, null, val, null
        from t2
        union all
        select key, null, null, val
        from t3)
  group by key
  

  If you can do it in a single query, Union all 250 + tables, you don't need to worry about chaining or migration. It may be necessary to do this in a few passes, depending on the resources available on your server. If so, I would be inclined to first create the table, with a larger than normal free percent, making the first game as a right inset and other pass or past as a merger.

  Another solution might be to use the approach above, but limit the range of keys with each pass. So pass we would have a like predicate when the key between 1 and 10 in every branch of the union, pass 2 would have key between 11 and 20, etc. In this way, everything would be straight inserts.

  That said, I'm going back to my second question above, why the hell you want or need to do that? What is the company you want to solve. There could be a much better way to meet the requirement.

  John

• For a single table import failed...

  Hello
  On the production server, I reported a user db, let's call it PRD_USER, with tablespace PRD_TBL default.
  On the development server, I reported a user db, let's call it PRD_USER, with tablespace DEV_TBL default.
  On the production server, I use the db of exp utility to import as:
  IMP System/Manager of the user PRD_USER touser = PRD_USER = ignore = file_name = «...» ' log = «...» ».
  Succeeds the import for about 25 tables and indexes and constraints, but it fails for a single table with the error: {I don't remember the error ORA- and I do not have access currently} DEV_TBL tablespace does not exist.
  
  Of course this tablespace does not exist on production env. But how this problem arises because the default tablespace for the user is not DEV_TBL but PRD_TBL...?
  
  Do you have any idea what can be the cause and how can I overcome this problem when importing...? {Note: I gave a temporary solution... take the table creation sql script leaving aside the reference of the tablespace "DEV_TBL"}.
  
  The two servers work in exactly the same version of DB...
  Note: I use DB 10g v.2
  
  Thank you
  SIM

  If the table has Partitions, import strives to create the Partitions (in the CREATE TABLE statement) on the original table space.

  OR there is a LOB segment in the table import strives to create on the original table space.

  Hemant K Collette

• Multiple values in a single Table cell

  Hello

  I have a requirement of the customer. I need to show multiple values within a table cell

  Example of

  Location	City	Shop
  North	City A	HS-200, SH-210, SH310
  South	City B	SH - 100, SH341
  East	City C	SH-20

  But my table shows repeating cell as follows.

  Location	City	Shop
  North	City A	SH-200
  North	City A	SH-210
  North	City A	SH310
  South	City B	SH-100
  South	City B	SH341
  East	City C	SH-20

  So I need your help to show repeated STORE name in a single column of the Table.

  Thank you

  Try this

  EVALUATE_AGGR ('LISTAGG (%1, %2) within THE GROUP (ORDER BY DESC %3)', TableName.ColumnName, ',', TableName.ColumnName)

• Commit a single table

  How engage us only one table in a session without validation other tables.

  COMMIT is not specific table. It's operations. If you perform DML operations on multiple tables in a single transaction and commit to the end, all changes to the table will be committed. You can partially achieve you objective is by marching the DML first on the table that you want to validate, then validation and DML for the other tables.
  OR by using the PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS TRANSACTION for transactions that don't have that tables you want to commit to.

  You can post the actual code to give a better idea of your problem.

• Advanced reading single Table field

  Hello

  I use SPEL binding to set the read attribute only to a text field that becomes editable when certain conditions are met.
  However, the field is a search criteria for the advanced table and when I search a few lines that they are read-only. The search criteria is also ready only

  

  If I select a line and click on change, the search criteria becomes editable.

  How can I solve this error?

  

  Varun,

  1. from the page that looks like you are NOT advanced table, you use table, right? I think you are referring to advanced search?

  The behavior you're seeing is because the same pitch is used for research and the table of results. And you have a spell on this column.

  Try to implement the steps below and see what happens.

  1. remove the fate of the field.

  2. Add the fate programmatically using the DataBoundValue as below [for example, I used ActualFlag MessageChoice]:

  OAMessageChoiceBean messageChoiceBean = (OAMessageChoiceBean)webBean.findChildRecursive("ActualFlag");
  if(messageChoiceBean != null)
  {
    OADataBoundValueViewObject actFlagDataBound = new OADataBoundValueViewObject(messageChoiceBean, "customReadOnlyAttr");
    messageChoiceBean.setAttributeValue(oracle.cabo.ui.UIConstants.READ_ONLY_ATTR,actFlagDataBound);
  }
  

  If the above change works, do the same for all lines you need the fate and active research.

  Let us know how you go.

  See you soon

  AJ

• How can I find the top row of a single table, split among several images in each image.

  Hi all.

  Thanks in advance.

  You can browse all the cells in a row column * and ask the first insertion of a text on his cell point user.user parentTextFrames [0].

  If the ID value has changed, the cell is in a different text frame. As well as its line.

  CC-2015, it might be a little different, because we have a new type of cell: CellTypeEnum.GRAPHIC_TYPE_CELL (not insertionPoints pave the way).

  You can also:

  Reproduce all text blocks in history, in that the table is sitting and control for unique tables in duplicates.

  Uwe

  * edit

• Query to find distinct records based on different roles of single table

  Hello to all the gurus,
  
  I have a table structure such as
  Unique Student_ID can have several attributes - teacher, University, sports.
  
  My request is to retrieve the total number of those students who have the combination of the value of the attribute of all (i.e. students who is an instructor/Professor/sports, but also the scholar)
  
  SELECT distinct (Student_ID) OF student_role_INDICATORS where Student_ID in
  (
  SELECT Student_ID FROM student_role WHERE ATTR_VAL =' teacher '
  Union
  SELECT Student_ID FROM student_role WHERE ATTR_VAL =' Monitor'
  Union
  SELECT Student_ID FROM student_role WHERE ATTR_VAL =' sports '
  Union
  SELECT Student_ID FROM student_role WHERE ATTR_VAL =' scholar '
  )
  
  But it gives me the correct results.
  
  
  I tried to use the case as - options
  
  SELECT count (distinct Student_ID) of student_role_INDICATORS
  CASE
  WHEN ATTR_VAL = 'Teacher' AND ATTR_VAL = 'Monitor' AND ATTR_VAL = 'Athlete' AND ATTR_VAL = 'scientist '.
  THEN '1'
  ELSE ' 0'
  END
  
  But SQL does not.
  
  Kindly help me. Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  The query I posted above shows all the students who have the combination of the value of the attribute of all (i.e. students who is an instructor/Professor/sports, but also the scholar). I forgot that you asked their County (their total number). So, to get the total number of those students who have the combination of the value of the attribute of all (i.e. students who is an instructor/Professor/sports, but also the scholar), just change the query I posted below:

  SELECT count(distinct (Student_ID)) FROM student_role_INDICATORS where Student_ID in
  (SELECT Student_ID FROM student_role WHERE ATTR_VAL=' Teacher'
  )
  and  Student_ID in
  (SELECT Student_ID FROM student_role WHERE ATTR_VAL=' Monitor')
  and Student_ID in
  (SELECT Student_ID FROM student_role WHERE ATTR_VAL=' Sportsman')
  and  Student_ID in
  (
  SELECT Student_ID FROM student_role WHERE ATTR_VAL=' Scholar'
  )
  

  Note: I just added County to the query I posted in my first answer.

• Retrieve a single table with RMAN

  Hello
  I'm working on a database of Oracle 11 g Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64 bit Production With the Real Application Clusters option.
  
  I did a bad update on a table.
  I have a level 0 backup before the update
  Is it possible to recover the unique table in an instant before the update with RMAN?
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  Samuel

  This is called a point in time recovery.

  Here you must create an auxiliary database from the backup.

  If you have space in your current server then you can create it here or otherwise in another server.

  1 restore the system, sysaux, cancellation and this tablespace that contains the deleted table.
  2 drop all the other tablespace in the auxiliary database in State of Mount
  3. recover the database to when the table was dropped or updated updated
  4. take the auxiliary database table export and import it into the original database

• Move a single table with data engine

  Hello
  
  I'm new on data mover. I want to move a table and I used the following script
  
  the value of log c:\app\psft\export.log.
  output c:\app\psft\export.dat;
  export PS_COMMISSION;
  
  I get the error
  
  unsuccessful end 'command is not valid in bootstrap mode "?
  
  help please?

  Use non-bootstrap mode instead (e.g. PS or VP1 or whatever else as SYSADM).

  Nicolas.