How to administrate SRP547W via IPSec VPN?

Similar Questions

• 9.0 can a dynamic nat be used via ipsec vpn?

  9.0 can a dynamic nat be used via ipsec vpn?

  We have a vpn and work between asa and when we run traffic through a static nat rule traffic goes over the vpn. When we use a dynamic nat traffic does not get picked up by the ACL vpn.

  We disable the nat rules to switch back and just so, even when we use the same destination to source the result is the same.

  Am I missing something with 9.0 versions of code? If I disable all the nats and pass traffic it goes via the vpn.

  So, it seems that when you use the dynamic nat statement, it pushes traffic to the external interface without looking at the acl of vpn. Please let me know if I'm crazy, I'm a newb on 8.3 zip code.

  Thank you

  Have you included in the ACL crytop natted ip address or range?

  You allowed natted ip address or range to the other end of the tunnel?

• ASA - upgrade to 8.4, impossible to ping inside the interface via IPSec VPN

  We have configured a site 5, site to site VPN scenario.   Last week, we have upgraded 2 devices ASA 5505 to 8.4.2.   Before the upgrade, our monitoring software would ping the inside interface from remote devices to confirm VPN tunnels were established, as well as the addresses of remote devices and the outside of the ASA.   While we were on 8.2, remote equipment successfully ping the inside interface.   After that we went to 8.4.2 we can do a ping to this interface.   We looked at the newspapers and we see the ICMP traffic that is listed in the newspaper, but the remote equipment does not receive back icmp traffic.   We can ping successfully from local hardware interface inside and the external interface of remote devices successfully.  In addition, we can ping material behind the two devices in both directions successfully.

  We are unable to remotely manage the device through the VPN tunnel

  Net is:

  ASA #1 inside 10.168.107.1 (running ASA 8.2)

  ASA #2 inside 10.168.101.1 (running ASA 8,4)

  Server 1 (behind the ASA #1) 10.168.107.34

  Server 2 (behind the ASA #2) 10.168.101.14

  Can ping server 1 Server 2

  Can ping server 1 to 1 of the SAA

  Can ping server 2-ASA 2

  Can ping server 2 to server 1

  Can ping server 2 ASA 1

  Can ping ASA 2 ASA 1

  can not ping ASA 1 and 2 of the ASA

  can not ping server 1 and 2 of the ASA

  cannot access the ASA 2 https for management interface, nor can the ASDM software

  Here is the config on ASA (attached) 2.

  Any thoughts would be appreciated.

  Hey Joseph,.

  Most likely, you hit this bug:

  CSCtr16184            Details of bug

  To-the-box traffic switches vpn hosts after upgrade to 8.4.2.

  Symptom: After the upgrade of the ASA to 8.4.2 all management traffic to employment (including the) ICMP/telnet/ssh/ASDM) hosts via the VPN (L2L or remote access VPN) can fail the IP access address to the administration. Conditionsof : 1. the problem occurs if ASA is on 8.4.2. Not been seen on 8.4.1. 2. the user directly logged in the face of internal interfaces no problem with ICMP/telnet/ssh/AMPS in their respective interfaces. Workaround: The problem goes back to a Manual NAT statement that straddles the address IP-access to the administration. The NAT must have both the source areas and destination. Add the keyword "research route" at the end of the statement by NAT solves the problem. Ex: IP address access to the administration Interface of the ASA is 192.168.1.1. ! Statement by NAT overlapping: NAT obj destination - 192.168.1.0 obj - 192.168.1.0 Shared source (indoor, outdoor) VPN-vpn-obj static obj! New declaration: NAT obj destination - 192.168.1.0 obj - 192.168.1.0 Shared source (indoor, outdoor) public static obj - vpn vpn-obj-research route

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtr16184

  HTH,

  Raga

• How to get several standard via ipsec vpn subnet?

  Dear all,

  I have this scenario:

  A - Hand router

  Cisco 881

  private network: 10.10.10.0/24

  private address: 10.10.10.2

  address: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx

  B branch office router

  DrayTek vigor 2600

  private network: 100.100.100.0/24

  private address: 100.100.100.1

  sound: .yyy

  C - seat router

  range Cisco 1800 (no access - not mine)

  private network: 10.10.10.0/24

  private address: 10.10.10.1

  D another subnet in HQ

  private network: 10.20.20.0/24

  available in C

  There is a standard VPN ipsec from A to B due interoperability and compatibility between cisco and draytek. the vpn is in place and works very well.

  D is accessible from a C: hole

  #ping router ip 10.20.20.15 source vlan 1

  Type to abort escape sequence.
  Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 10.20.20.15, wait time is 2 seconds:
  Packet sent with the address 10.10.10.2 source
  !!!!!
  Success rate is 100 per cent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 52/56/64 ms

  Now, I need reach D from B.

  I configured adding the 10.20.20.0/24 routing via vpn subnet B and tested the connection replacing the cisco 881 (A) with an another drytek vigor 2820; Add a static route in the drytek 2820 (10.20.20.0 via 10.10.10.1) make B able to reach successfully the D with ping 10.20.20.15.

  After that I tried to divide the acl of tunnel and ping in vain 10.20.20.15 d, I noticed a match in acl:

  Router #sh ip access list 101
  Expand the access IP 101 list
  10 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 (3298 matches)
  20 permit ip 10.20.20.0 0.0.0.255 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 (14 matches)

  I also tried to prevent NAT from D to B without any match in acl after unsuccessful ping 10.20.20.15 d.

  Any suggestion is appreciated.

  Gianluca

  Hanks for the additional info

  So what is happening is the traffic is not getting encrypted, it is hitting the crypto acl but not getting not encrypted

  I know you would have checked it already, but please just check once more the entrance to nat and see if you have a deny for this traffic in the acl, nat

  We need to know why the tunnel isn't coming for this traffic

  could you please confirm wht is crypto ACLs on the other end, that's exactly the mirror image (2 acl), I don't know how the configuration is made at the other end

  give the following debug command

  Debug ip counterpart condition crypto / / if you have several tunnels will do conditional debugging

  Crypto ipsec its debug debug crypto or her (who was never there I think it's a bit confusing)

  one thing you can try if down the tunnel is also an option, just erase this tunnel using cry clear isa his id and disable remote session encryption and bring it and see if it happens

  Finally, given that I don't know how the other end is configured just try this as the encryption, ACLs on both ends

  10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255

  and the reverse on the other end and now try to brining of the tunnel to the top

• RV180 VPN route all internet traffic via IPSec VPN

  Hello

  I install my RV180 to VPN to our headquarters Fortigate 60 C. It works really well

  My only problem is that I don't know how to move internet traffic on our remote site by Headquarters. We want to use this technique so that all sites have the same web content filtering provided by our main Fortigate unit. I see clearly that all traffic destined to our internal network will go trough the VPN tunnel, but internet traffic will go through our modem at the remote site.

  My way of fortigate thinking said that I need a static route to transfer all traffic through the VPN tunnel. I've read elsewhere that I need to set up some sort of ACL.

  Anyone else has any ideas on this / has anyone successfully implemented somehting similar?

  Hi Jared,

  I don't think that RV180 takes complete care of tunneling. Complete tunneling allows you to all your traffic to VPN. RV180 made only split tunneling.

  Thank you

  Vijay

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• Administration of the ASA via IPSec VPN

  Recently, I upgraded my ASA5505 8.2.1 7.2 and curiously lost the ability to manage a VPN (via ASDM or SSH) unit. Before the upgrade, I was able to connect via a method without problem through the VPN. Internally, I still have no problem.

  The fault on the ASDM client message when I try to connect to remote is "Impossible to launch the 10.x.x.x:4444 Device Manager." If I look at the output of the console mode of information, I see later that there is a "completed by interception TCP Flow' regarding the conversation between ASA and my system remotely.

  The config lines are (I've got running on 443 webvpn):

  http server enable 4444

  255.x.x.x http inside 10.x.x.x

  http 192.x.x.x outside 255.x.x.x

  The 192 is located the beach DHCP VPN that get VPN clients (and I checked) such that these systems are able to connect to the ASDM or SSH management interface.

  Is there another ACL I need to make this work? Not sure why it worked without problem on 7.2 and as soon as I upgraded to 8.2.1, he stopped, without changing the config (manual).

  Thanks in advance for the help!

  Point VPN network ssh interface inside rather than the outside, should work, while vpn - ssh to the asa inside the ip address of the interface.

  without ssh 192.x.x.x 255.x.x.x outdoors.

  SSH 192.x.x.x 255.x.x.x inside.

  Concerning

• AAA ipsec vpn clients how to see the history of connection on asdm or asa5510

  Hello all, I would like to know how see history of connection ipsec vpn client users, they authenticate to the local aaa, not in active directory. I am able to see the current logon session. go to monitoring\vpn\vpn statistics\sessions, this shows me sessions underway, but I would like to see for example the connections client vpn for the last month. I did some research and saw the info on aaa Server? I checked that article and does not see what I was looking for.

  It's actually a called (NPS) network policy server microsoft radius server.

  The one I used (ACS 5 and ACS 5) who was just an example.

  You can review the below listed doc

  http://fixingitpro.com/2009/09/08/using-Windows-Server-2008-as-a-RADIUS-server-for-a-Cisco-ASA/

  Jatin kone

  -Does the rate of useful messages-

• 2 IPSec VPN + DMVPN

  Hello.

  Could you please tell me, how to create the second IPSec VPN on my router if crypto card is already set to the interface, and there is no other. This interface is also the NHRP\DMVPN interface. Router is a hub.

  Hey, Nikolay.

  For new dmvpn cloud you don't don't have set up a crmap to the interface. You can create a new tunnel interface and link a different transfer for her.

  If you want to add an IPsec-l2l connection or a new EasyVPN you can look at this example:

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac trset1
  transport mode
  output

  Crypto ipsec transform-set trset2 aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  map CRNAME 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto
  Description - VPN - 1
  defined peer IP_1
  Set transform-set trset1
  match address ACL_1
  output

  map CRNAME 2 ipsec-isakmp crypto
  Description - VPN - 2
  defined peer IP_1
  Set transform-set trset2
  match address ACL_2
  output

  interface FastEthernet0/0
  Description - outdoors-
  card crypto CRNAME
  output

  For an EasyVPN (or any other dynamic encryption card), you can use this example:

  crypto dynamic-map DYNMAP 1
  transform-set Set feat
  market arriere-route
  output

  card crypto crmap 3 - isakmp dynamic ipsec DYNMAP

  And example for DmVPN clouds to the 1 Router 2:

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac trset_1
  tunnel mode
  output
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac trset_2
  transport mode
  output

  Crypto ipsec Dmvpn-Profile1 profile
  Set transform-set trset_1
  output
  Crypto ipsec profile Profil2 dmvpn
  Set transform-set trset_2
  output

  Tunnel1 interface
  [network] IP address
  dynamic multicast of IP PNDH map
  PNDH network IP-1 id
  source of tunnel FastEthernet0/0
  multipoint gre tunnel mode
  key 1 tunnel
  Tunnel protection ipsec Dmvpn-Profile1 profile
  output

  interface tunnels2
  [network] IP address
  dynamic multicast of IP PNDH map
  PNDH network IP-2 id
  source of tunnel FastEthernet0/0
  multipoint gre tunnel mode
  tunnel key 2
  Profile of tunnel dmvpn Profil2 ipsec protection
  output

  Best regards.

• UC500 and IPsec VPN client - disconnects

  Just throw a question out there.
  I have a UC560 running uc500-advipservicesk9 - mz.151 - 2.T2 site HQ.  Remote users, about 8 of them, attempt to connect via IPsec VPN (v5.0.07.0440) HQ clients to access files, etc..  The behavior I see is 5 users to connect successfully, but only 5.  As soon as more users trying to connect, they have either:

  1. connect with success for a minutes, then unmold
  2. get a 412, remote peer is not responding
  3. connect, but someone of another session kickoff.

  Users use the same VPN profile, but with names of single user and passwords.

  Here are some of the CPU configs for VPN clients
  Configuration group customer crypto isakmp USER01
  key *.
  DNS 192.168.0.110
  pool USER01_POOL
  ACL USER01_ACL

  local RAUTHEN AAA authentication login
  permission of AAA local RAUTHOR network authenticated by FIS

  Crypto isakmp USER01_PROF profile
  match of group identity USER01
  list of authentication of client RAUTHEN
  RAUTHOR of ISAKMP authorization list.
  client configuration address respond

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  BA aes
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  lifetime 28800
  crypto ISAKMP policy 100
  BA aes
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  life 3600
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1000
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2

  I enabled debugging
  Debug crypto ISAKMP
  Debug crypto ipsec

  Here are some of the things that I see on him debugs
  604899: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 284724149
  604900: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): treatment protocol NOTIFY DPD/R_U_THERE 1
  0, message ID SPI = 284724149, a = 0x8E7C6E68
  604901: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): error suppression node 284724149 FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1.
  604902: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_INFO_NOTIFY
  604903: 16:41:13.333 Aug 21: ISAKMP: (2073): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

  581504: 16:59:12.805 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): purge the node-1455244451
  581505: 16:59:12.805 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): purge the node 840814618
  581506: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP (2147): received 201.195.231.162 packet dport 4500 sport 37897 Global (R) QM_IDLE
  581507: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: node set 801982813 to QM_IDLE
  581508: 20 August 16:59:13.933: ISAKMP: (2147): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 801982813
  581509: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: receives the payload type 18
  581510: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): treatment remove with load useful reason
  581511: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove the doi = 0
  581512: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove Protocol id = 1
  581513: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove spi_size = 16
  581514: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): remove the spis num = 1
  581515: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): delete_reason = 2
  581516: 20 August 16:59:13.933: ISAKMP: (2147): load DELETE_WITH_REASON, processing of message ID = 801982813, reason: DELETE_BY_USER_COMMAND
  581517: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): peer does not paranoid KeepAlive.

  581518: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): peer does not paranoid KeepAlive.

  581519: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): removal of State of SA reason 'Order BY user' (R) QM_IDLE (post 201.195.231.162)
  581520: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): error suppression node 801982813 FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1.
  581521: 16:59:13.933 Aug 20: ISAKMP: node set-878597687 to QM_IDLE
  581522: 20 August 16:59:13.937: ISAKMP: (2147): lot of 201.195.231.162 sending peer_port my_port 4500 37897 (R) QM_IDLE
  581523: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  581524: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): purge the node-878597687
  581525: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL
  581526: 16:59:13.937 Aug 20: ISAKMP: (2147): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_DEST_SA

  I opened a case with TAC on this and they do not understand what is the cause.  For them, it looks like a bug without papers.  And their recommendation is to reboot, upgrade or try configuring L2TP for remote users.

  Thank you

  JP

  JP,

  An update of IOS is worth it, even if him debugs seems to indicate that there is a problem with the client. If possible, I always suggest test with another client to see if it is unique to the Cisco VPN Client on Win7. Regarding the limit of 20 tunnel, it is very probably the number of IPsec security associations. If you issue a 'show crypto eli', this example displays the number of Sessions that are currently active IPSec.

  HTH,

  Frank

• IPSec VPN pix 501 no LAN access

  I'm trying to set up an IPSec VPN in a basic small business scenario. I am able to connect to my pix 501 via IPSec VPN and browse the internet, but I am unable to ping or you connect to all devices in the Remote LAN. Here is my config:

  : Saved

  :

  6.3 (3) version PIX

  interface ethernet0 car

  interface ethernet1 100full

  nameif ethernet0 WAN security0

  nameif ethernet1 LAN security99

  enable encrypted password xxxxxxxxxxxxx

  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx encrypted passwd

  host name snowball

  domain xxxxxxxxxxxx.local

  clock timezone PST - 8

  fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512

  fixup protocol ftp 21

  fixup protocol h323 h225 1720

  fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719

  fixup protocol http 80

  fixup protocol pptp 1723

  fixup protocol rsh 514

  fixup protocol rtsp 554

  fixup protocol sip 5060

  fixup protocol sip udp 5060

  fixup protocol 2000 skinny

  No fixup not protocol smtp 25

  fixup protocol sqlnet 1521

  fixup protocol tftp 69

  names of

  acl_in list of access permit udp any any eq field

  acl_in list of access permit udp any eq field all

  acl_in list access permit tcp any any eq field

  acl_in tcp allowed access list any domain eq everything

  acl_in list access permit icmp any any echo response

  access-list acl_in allow icmp all once exceed

  acl_in list all permitted access all unreachable icmp

  acl_in list access permit tcp any any eq ssh

  acl_in list access permit tcp any any eq www

  acl_in tcp allowed access list everything all https eq

  acl_in list access permit tcp any host 192.168.5.30 eq 81

  acl_in list access permit tcp any host 192.168.5.30 eq 8081

  acl_in list access permit tcp any host 192.168.5.22 eq 8081

  acl_in list access permit icmp any any echo

  access-list acl_in permit tcp host 76.248.x.x a

  access-list acl_in permit tcp host 76.248.x.x a

  allow udp host 76.248.x.x one Access-list acl_in

  access-list acl_out permit icmp any one

  ip access list acl_out permit a whole

  acl_out list access permit icmp any any echo response

  acl_out list access permit icmp any any source-quench

  allowed any access list acl_out all unreachable icmp

  access-list acl_out permit icmp any once exceed

  acl_out list access permit icmp any any echo

  Allow Access-list no. - nat icmp a whole

  access-list no. - nat ip 192.168.5.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0

  access-list no. - nat ip 172.16.0.0 allow 255.255.0.0 any

  access-list no. - nat permit icmp any any echo response

  access-list no. - nat permit icmp any any source-quench

  access-list no. - nat icmp permitted all all inaccessible

  access-list no. - nat allow icmp all once exceed

  access-list no. - nat permit icmp any any echo

  pager lines 24

  MTU 1500 WAN

  MTU 1500 LAN

  IP address WAN 65.74.x.x 255.255.255.240

  address 192.168.5.1 LAN IP 255.255.255.0

  alarm action IP verification of information

  alarm action attack IP audit

  IP local pool pptppool 172.16.0.2 - 172.16.0.13

  PDM logging 100 information

  history of PDM activate

  ARP timeout 14400

  Global (WAN) 1 interface

  NAT (LAN) - access list 0 no - nat

  NAT (LAN) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  static (LAN, WAN) 65.x.x.37 192.168.5.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (LAN, WAN) 65.x.x.36 192.168.5.20 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (LAN, WAN) 65.x.x.38 192.168.5.30 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (LAN, WAN) 65.x.x.39 192.168.5.40 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (LAN, WAN) 65.x.x.42 192.168.5.22 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (LAN, WAN) 65.x.x.43 192.168.5.45 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (LAN, WAN) 65.x.x.44 192.168.5.41 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (LAN, WAN) 65.x.x.45 192.168.5.42 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (LAN, WAN) 65.x.x.46 192.168.5.44 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  static (LAN, WAN) 65.x.x.41 192.168.5.21 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  acl_in access to the WAN interface group

  access to the LAN interface group acl_out

  Route WAN 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 65.x.x.34 1

  Timeout xlate 0:05:00

  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225

  H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00

  Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute

  GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

  RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server

  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  NTP server 72.14.188.195 source WAN

  survey of 76.248.x.x WAN host SNMP Server

  location of Server SNMP Sacramento

  SNMP Server contact [email protected] / * /

  SNMP-Server Community xxxxxxxxxxxxx

  SNMP-Server enable traps

  enable floodguard

  the string 1 WAN fragment

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  Sysopt connection permit-pptp

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac RIGHT

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10 transform-set RIGHT

  map mymap 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

  client configuration address map mymap crypto initiate

  client configuration address map mymap crypto answer

  card crypto mymap WAN interface

  ISAKMP enable WAN

  ISAKMP nat-traversal 20

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

  encryption of ISAKMP policy 10

  ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

  10 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  vpngroup myvpn address pptppool pool

  vpngroup myvpn Server dns 192.168.5.44

  vpngroup myvpn by default-field xxxxxxxxx.local

  vpngroup split myvpn No. - nat tunnel

  vpngroup idle 1800 myvpn-time

  vpngroup myvpn password *.

  Telnet 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 LAN

  Telnet timeout 5

  SSH 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 LAN

  SSH timeout 30

  Console timeout 0

  VPDN group pptpusers accept dialin pptp

  VPDN group ppp authentication pap pptpusers

  VPDN group ppp authentication chap pptpusers

  VPDN group ppp mschap authentication pptpusers

  VPDN group ppp encryption mppe 128 pptpusers

  VPDN group pptpusers client configuration address local pptppool

  VPDN group pptpusers customer 192.168.5.44 dns configuration

  VPDN group pptpusers pptp echo 60

  VPDN group customer pptpusers of local authentication

  VPDN username password xxx *.

  VPDN username password xxx *.

  VPDN enable WAN

  dhcpd address 192.168.5.200 - 192.168.5.220 LAN

  dhcpd 192.168.5.44 dns 8.8.8.8

  dhcpd lease 3600

  dhcpd ping_timeout 750

  dhcpd enable LAN

  username privilege 0 encrypted password xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx

  username privilege 0 encrypted password xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx

  Terminal width 80

  Cryptochecksum:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  : end

  I'm sure it has something to do with NAT or an access list, but I can't understand it at all. I know it's a basic question, but I would really appreaciate help!
  Thank you very much
  Trevor

  "No. - nat' ACL doesn't seem correct, please make sure you want to remove the following text:

  do not allow any No. - nat icmp access list a whole

  No No. - nat ip 172.16.0.0 access list allow 255.255.0.0 any

  No No. - nat access list permit icmp any any echo response

  No No. - nat access list permit icmp any any source-quench

  No No. - nat access list permit all all unreachable icmp

  No No. - nat access list do not allow icmp all once exceed

  No No. - nat access list only allowed icmp no echo

  You must have 1 line as follows:

  access-list no. - nat ip 192.168.5.0 allow 255.255.255.0 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0

  Please 'clear xlate' after the changes described above.

  In addition, if you have a personal firewall enabled on the host you are trying to connect from the Client VPN, please turn it off and try again. Personal firewall of Windows normally blocks the traffic of different subnets.

  Hope that helps.

• URL via SSL VPn access

  Dear members

  Please see the diagram for an easy understanding of the issue.

  I am facing a problem with the SSL VPN configured on ASA 5520. Here's the simple network topology.

  customer has an ERP server inside the segment, which is runniing Apche / Tomcat 5.5 and listening on port 8204.Complete URL to access the installed application is

  http://192.168.2.1:8204 / system/servlet/login

  ASA connects to a router in parameter, which has a configured AS VPN remote access. Cisco VPN client users can access this URL easily when they connect via VPN, also if I create a static translation for this IP 192.168.2.1, the full URL is accessible from the outside, but the problem of SSl VPN, when I enter the URL, nothing appears, and Session expires, however if I just enter http://192.168.2.1:8204 , Apache /Tomcat Page opens menas through SSL VPN can I reach the web server running on 192.168.2.1, but this particular URL is not accessible.

  Here apache on the ERP server is listening on a nonstandard port, which could be the reason, I need to create a forwarding port or "smart."

  I already tried with port forwarding, but that has not solved the problem.

  All entries from your side will be highly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Ahad

  Hi Ahad,

  When you access the server ( http://192.168.2.1:8204 / system/servlet/connectionURL) from the inside, the URL in the browser address bar remains the same? Or it redirects?

  On the login page is a java applet?

  Now, there are several things to try:

  -do a "view page source" on the work (internal or via IPsec vpn) login page and again on the default (via webvpn) page and compare - that provides any suspicion?

  -You can install a software like Charles SSL Proxy (http://www.charlesproxy.com/ - note this is not a product of Cisco, or approved by Cisco) to see exactly what is happening above the SSL tunnel (i.e. it will show you the HTTP request in the browser to the server and the response.) Again, you can do this for both a job and the absence of case to compare.

  -as a possible solution: create a bookmark HTTP on the portal of this URL and select "smart tunnel" for her.

  HTH

  Herbert

• IP address of the IPSec VPN client did not get distributed via EIGRP

  We use an ASA for VPN remote access. He is running EIGRP redistribute static routes. When a client Anyconnect SSL connects, the SAA creates a static route for this client, and it gets redistributed via EIGRP. When an IPSec VPN client connects, the SAA creates a static route for this customer, but he isn't redisributed via EIGRP and so the client can not achieve anything. Why he would distribute a static created by an IPSec client?

  Thank you

  Have you set up IPP on dynamic Cryptography?

• Cisco ASA5520 facing ISP with private IP address. How to get the IPSec VPN through the internet?

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-top : 0 ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-left : 0 ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ;}

  Hello guys,.

  I have Cisco ASA5520 facing the ISP with private IP address. We don't have a router and how to get the IPSec VPN through the internet?

  The question statement not the interface pointing to ISP isn't IP address private and inside as well.

  Firewall configuration:

  Firewall outside interface Gi0 10.0.1.2 > ISP 10.0.1.1 with security-level 0

  Firewall inside the interface Ethernet0 192.168.1.1 > LAN switch 192.168.1.2 with security-level 100

  I have public IP block 199.9.9.1/28

  How can I use the public IP address to create the IPSec VPN tunnel between two sites across the internet?

  can I assign a public IP address on the Gig1 inside the interface with the security level of 100 and how to apply inside to carry on this interface?

  If I configure > firewall inside of the item in gi1 interface ip address 199.9.9.1/28 with security-level 100. How to make a safe lane VPN through this interface on the internet?

  I'm used to the public IP address allocation to the interface outside of the firewall and private inside the interface IP address.

  Please help with configuration examples and advise.

  Thank you

  Eric

  Unfortunately, you can only complete the VPN connection on the interface the VPN connection source, in your case the external interface.

  3 options:

  (1) connect a router in front of the ASA and assign your public ip address to the ASA outside interface.

  OR /.

  (2) If your ISP can perform static translation of 1 to 1, then you can always finish the VPN on the external interface and ask your provider what is the static ip address assigned to your ASA out of the IP (10.0.1.2) - this will launch the VPN of bidirectionally

  OR /.

  (3) If your ISP performs PAT (dynamic NAT), then you can only start the tunnel VPN on the side of the ASA and the other end of the tunnel must be configured to allow VPN LAN-to-LAN dynamics.

• EIGRP via IPSec site to site VPN

  having trouble getting to work through an IOS EIGRP (2ea. 2811 s) connection of the site to site VPN IPSec peer.  IPSec VPN works with route directions static tunnel.  By using the IPSec policy basis and VTI interface:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key "" address 192.168.x.66

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac vpn

  Crypto ipsec df - game

  !

  static-crypt 6 map ipsec-isakmp crypto

  the value of 192.168.x.66 peer

  Set transform-set vpn

  match address 101

  !

  tunnel1 interface

  IP address 1xx.33.20.226 255.255.255.252

  no ip redirection

  IP 1400 MTU

  IP tcp adjust-mss 1360

  QoS before filing

  source of tunnel FastEthernet 0/0

  destination 192.168.x.66 tunnel

  crypto static crypto map

  !

  interface FastEthernet 0/0

  Add an IP...

  crypto static crypto map

  !

  Router eigrp 10

  passive-interface default

  no passive-interface FastEthernet 0/1

  no passive-interface Tunnel1

  network...

  network...

  No Auto-resume

  !

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Tunnel1

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 146.33.20.225<-- peer's="" default-gateway="" is="" vpn="" peer="" router="" on="" other="" side="" of="" satelite="">

  must be something simple, but I can't.

  Thank you, kevin

  Unfamiliar with the VTI, but I think you are missing:

  ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode

  Profile of tunnel ipsec protection

  Also don't think that you need crypto card in the tunnel because it is already on fa0/0.  What looks like the access-list 101? Take a look at this doc:

  http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t14/feature/guide/gtIPSctm.html

• How do I allow IPSec VPN client-to-client

  Can someone briefly describe the steps on an ASA to allow both IPSec VPN clients talking to each other. They are in the same pool of addresses. I already have two same-security-traffic permit for inter and intra interface statements. Thank you!

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

  try to including this traffic in the States of sheep you have

  Alos, you may need to make changes to the acl split rules