Hyperion 11.1.2.1 load balancing

Similar Questions

• The implementation of hyperion IR application load balancing while 2 servers point to a DB?

  There is a DB production. Some time need to configure the load balancer for Hyperion interactive report achieve high availability.

  As know there are a lot of method to implement load balancing, want to know if

  given two machines virtual (each of them has its own application server), and two of them going to point to the same DB via shared Assembly called/U01 player.

  After the official documentations of oracle documented, there are scarce resources can refer to, any who knew this case of configuration before?

  Hello

  We have implemented this type of solution:

  (1) server 1: install and configure in usual way. Better to use different patterns for each product.

  When you configure Reporting and analysis framework services give repository location as shared drive location.

  (2) server 2: Installation of any product that has been installed in the server 1. While configure the database for the shared services registry point to detail diagram 1 server, it automatically configure the database for all the other remaining products.

  When you configure Reporting and analysis framework services give location of the repository as a shared drive which gave in Server 1.

  Make sure that the Shared disk is accessible from both servers.

  You can deploy applications weblogic Server from Server 2 by giving details of server 1. ensure that the weblogic Server 1 service must always be upward and running for Server 2 workspace to work.

  So if we set up the web server in both servers, then you must have load balancer and configure logical web address to this server for load balancing.

  If you configure only in one of the server, then this workspace server that url will act as load swing url.the problem with this is always THAT OSH must be running or workspace url will not work

  hope you understood.

• Hyperion Planning11.1.2.3. Server load balancing

  We will install and configure Hyperion planning in the cluster environment. After you have configured the servers planning successfully how to implement load balancing. Do we need to use hardware or software load balancing. I have no idea on balancers load. We must use to configure logical address that points to the load balancer server but do not know how the load balancing server must be? Please notify.

  Install all along planning to Server1 products and configure them.

  Go to Server2, install only the planning and deploy using the same database.

  WebLogic will create 2 (Plannin0, planning of the depenses1) servers in single Cluster (using the Round robin algorithm).

  Thus, at the time of access automatically weblogic will redirect requests internally.

  Thank you

  Mady

• Hyperion 11.1.2.3 Linux load balancing installation - how to test?

  Hi all

  I installed the version Hyperion 11.1.2.3 on 2 Server (6) of Linux. We installed the Foundation Hyperion Planning and Essbase on Server1. Hyperion Planning on Server2 (Load balance).

  Installation and configuration performed and workspace, planning of work in both servers. In the Weblogic planning Cluster is created by EMP Configurator only and deployed Planning0, planning of the depenses1 servers.

  Now how to test the load balancing happens or not?

  Thank you

  Mady

  As demand would go through web server (OHS), first thing to try would be to stop planning0 and check if you are able to do things, then vice - versa. By default, I think that the load balancing would be responsive, so as the first request goes to planning0 then the depenses1 planning and planning0.

  Thank you

  Vivek

• Problem in Configuration of Hyperion FDM load balance...

  Hi all
  
  I installed hyperion essbase, planning, Hfm and Fdqm 11.1.1.3 version.
  
  but I get error when setting up the configuration of fdm load balance...
  
  error: when I click on test connection in authentication providers (Shared services (CSS))... get the error message like cannot create ActiveX component
  
  Please give me answer if you know about it.
  
  Kind regards
  
  Mady

  This error indicates that the dcom COMJNIBRIDGE object is not able to successfully launch or it was not properly registered on the FDM application server:

  (a) start > run > DCOMCNFG
  (b) expand Component Services > computers > my computer > DCOM CONFIG
  (c) locate the COMJNIBRIDGE object, right-click and choose "Properties".
  (d) click the identity tab and choose "This user" and look for the Service of FDM account and enter and confirm the password
  (e) re - test

• FDMEE load balancing

  Hello

  According to the documentation of EMP 11.1.2.3

  Oracle Hyperion EPM system high availability and Disaster Recovery Guide

  I don't see anything about the FDMEE load balancing and high availability.

  Can implement us the high availability and FDMEE load balancing?

  Yes, it works in the same way as other Java Web applications.

  See you soon

  John

  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• Load Balancing configuration failed with the failure of the connection shared after 11.1.2.2 11.1.2.3 upgrade

  Hello

  We have our EMP system had put 11.1.2.2 to 11.1.2.3 and it's a broadcast environment (Windows 2008 Server) and in one of the server, we installed FDM and after 11.1.2.2 upgrade to 11.1.2.3.

  When we load balance FDM Configuration, SSP is failed with " Shared Services Connection Failed '

  What I did:

  Deleted all entries in the object load balancing DCOM {E652643D...} and the Application Server Config {26AD6592..} and the COMJNIBridge DCOM objects. Re-directed EMP config for FDM application server

  and reconfigured the FDM with mycmsc\svc_hyperionfdm of the user application server. Config of load balancing is still unable to the connection of Shared Services with the error "Shared Services cannot connect".

  I tried the local administrator user but fails in the same way

  Windows system log entries:

  The application-specific permission settings do not grant Local Activation permission for the COM with CLSID {E652643D-6CC1-48AC-915D-01842B04F292} server application and the APPID

  {E652643D-6CC1-48AC-915D-01842B04F292} the user NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM SID (S-1-5-1 of the address LocalHost (using LRPC).

  This security permission can be modified using the Component Services administrative tool.

  Windows Application log entries:

  Recovery of the class factory COM for component with CLSID {E652643D-6CC1-48AC-915D-01842B04F292} failed due to the following error: 80070005.

  COMJNIBridegWrapper.log entries

  08/07/2014 10:42:06: unknown COMException error

  at Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.LateBinding.InternalLateCall (Object o, Type objType, String name, Object [] args, paramnames, CopyBack [] Boolean String, Boolean IgnoreReturn) at

  Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.NewLateBinding.LateCall (Object Instance, Type, Type, String MemberName, Object [] Arguments, String [] ArgumentNames, TypeArguments, Boolean] [] Type

  CopyBack, Boolean IgnoreReturn) at Hyperion.Fdm.Api.Common.Security.Authentication.AuthenticateUser (String userName, String password, the domain, String String & ssoToken)

  Hello

  Finally, we could solve this problem. Thank you for all your help.

  Kind regards

  VJ

• Correct settings to use Smart Connect and load balancing?

  Hi guys

  I have a question, the answer of which I was not able to find explicitly, so I hope a quick fix OK / not OK for you:

  I would use tri-band technology provides the R8000, i.e. to activate Smart Connect / load balancing. Is - it only works Ghzs 5 band, or the router can also connect clients on the 2 Ghz bands?

  If this is true, then I need to give the strip of 2, 4 GHz the SSID the same 5 Ghz band, correct?

  Otherwise, if it only works in the 5 Ghz bands, I could keep the SSID distinguishes?

  Thank you

  Balancing of resources between the two radios. 2, 4 GHz band vs a single radio, the two radio channels in the 5 GHz band.

• Network Load Balancing error

  Hello

  I have DC with 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0 P.DNS 192.168.10.2 & ADC 192.168.10.3 P.DNS 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0

  When I configure the network load balancing in win2012r2 std I get below error. Please help on this.

  "NLB Manager running on a system with all networks bound to NLB mifht does not work as expected.
  If all interfaces are ser to run NLB in "unicast" mode, Manager NLB will fail to connect to the hosts. »

  Thank you.

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  *
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum

• What load balancing algorithm using the LRT224?

  I was wondering if anyone knew what algorithm of load balancing the LRT224 use since I can't find it anywhere and the telephone support line does not.  It is very similar to the RV320 of Cisco that uses Weighted Round Robin, but I don't think that the Linksys uses this algorithm because it includes speeds of bandwidth unlike the cisco that does not work.  and if anyone can also check that this unit doesn't package base rather than load balanced session load balancing.  as much information as possible would be appreciated!

  The standard of the LRT load balancing is alternated:

  Example:

  1 TCP connection to website-online WAN1

  2 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN2

  3 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN1

  4 TCP connection to website1.com-online WAN2

  If you enable the feature (recommended) sticky load balancing load balancing is done on a base per session instead of the base of the connection.

  Example:

  1 TCP connection to website-online WAN1

  2 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN2

  3 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN2

  4 TCP connection to website1.com-online WAN1

• SRW2008 load balancing

  Hi, what is the best way to balance the two connectrions with SRW2008 internet? Is possible to also "switch"?

  Thank you in advace

  Nino

  Aggregation of links (sometimes called "Bundling") combines two or more physical ports into a single logical port. After that, you have only one logical port. This allows you to increase the bandwidth on a link. To use it, you must connect the ports combined in another switch/device that supports the same and has the same configuration.

  So, Yes to use the aggregation of links, you'll need another switch like the SRW2008.

  However, the aggregation of links isn't load balancing. The logical port is still a single connection, even if it's running on multiple threads. It must connect to the same physical device.

• RV042 load balancing

  If I set up the router to load balance between my cable connection and DSL connection I see no advantage if I only have one computer connected to the router?

  Thank you

  David

  I think that you will not see much of a difference if you only use one computer.

• Maxum interfaces for the load balancing wan

  Hi all

  You know the interfaces maximum wan that I can use for load balancing?

  Hi Iimran,

  Lets say your sonicwall has N interfaces. You can use the interfaces wan (N-1) for load balancing

  Kind regards

  Barath R

  #IWork4Dell

• How to configure das MD3200i load balancing

  I would like to connect a MD3200i (with two raid controllers) to one of our Windows 2003 R2 servers without the aid of a switch.

  After most of the documentation, some things remain pretty obscure to me. I'm new to MPIO/balancing and cannot figure how to set up.

  Is it possible to connect 1 nic host to RAID 0 and another host nic to RAID 1 and then combine the bandwidth? Thus having 2Gbs instead of 1Gbs? Or is it only a redundant path sollution, happening the other controller in case of failure of the first line. How can I configure this regarding the IP addresses, subnets. And where is the configuered to load balancing. This is explained in the documentation? I can't find it. I found a few examples that include the use of a switch, but none with das sollutions.

  What I have is 4 the MD3200i UTP cables to connect to the host. 2 the high raid controller and 2 on the lower raid controller. And use that I have 4x1Gbs, resulting a connection 4Gbs to a single partition on the MD3200i of load balancing.

  Thanks for any help.

  Multiple paths and in windows 2003 load balancing is managed by the driver MPIO is installed when you install the 'host' or 'full' version install MD Storage Manager. There is no need to separately aggregated network adapters to get the aggregate bandwidth. The pilot, by default, uses repetition alternated on all ports connected to a single controller.

  Also, for a single virtual disk, all i/o through a single controller and the second controller acts as a redundant path. So, if you have 2 x 1 Gbps connections to each controller, you will have, at most, 2 Gbps for each partition. Now, each controller can have virtual disks, so the second controller may have a second partition that will also have a separate between 2 x 1 Gbps connection.

  You can set IP addresses and subnets that are similar to the way that you would with a switch as long as you can test the connection port. It would be wise for each NETWORK card on the host on a different subnet and each port on the MD3200i on the corresponding subnet. This will make it easier when you set up your iSCSI.

  You can use the configuration utility to MD in place your iSCSI sessions too

  -Mohan

• The storage load balancing process

  We have a group of 4 members, total approximately 30 TB of space. In the past, we had a lot of volumes of 500 GB for ESX, after the installation of the ESXi5.1, we use higher volumes, about 1.5 TB. So there are a lot of changes in the storage pool. We find that the EQ is balancing of storage compared to 4 members as expected. We thought it was over two or three days agoo, but now he's balancing... then again for a couple of day all volumes are spread over 3 members, also, as expected, but he decides to charge storage it swings again... and again...  It is coming to an end sometimes?

  We have another group with 4 members and also the same amount of space, but it we do not use the 1.5 TB volumes again... here, we see that EQ is continuous storage load balancing pool.

  Im not worried yet :)), but whenever volumes are redestributing compared to members, it does not follow on some reconnects for ESX as the part of a volume can and will reside on another Member where on that time esx is not a connection to that session at that time.

  Hello René,.

  It will not be stuck in a loop.  Part of the balance to the maintenance of free space between the members.  So when several pages are written to a specific member, space balancing will create plans to move the blocks to the other members to free up space on this member.  It's an ongoing balancing act.  In addition, extended periods of heavy i/o load balancer Advanced Performance will swap pages in order to compensate for the latency between members.

  Kind regards