The implementation of hyperion IR application load balancing while 2 servers point to a DB?

Similar Questions

• Problem with the Info.plist file in application Loader

  Hello. I have a problem with the download process. When I choose the zip file I downloaded from the generator of Viewer in the application loader and I try to send it, the program tells me this: "Unable to process validation Info.plist demand at this time a general error. What can I do?

  Thank you

  I have been told by some people who have faced this problem it has been resolved. Can you please try again and check if the application download successfully?

• Hi ALL, did any attempt on the virtual computer NETWORK load balancing using HYPERV on UCS blades

  I try to configure the CASE server cluster by using the Unicast NLB on the virtual machine on different blades on the UCS, it works for awhile, then he abandoned packages.

  I heard that this screenplay of unicast is not supported in the UCS when she used END-host mode in the fabric interconnet...? any attempted before.

  Would it, I use the multicast mode is that something needs to be done on the FBI62020 or the LAN switch upstream. ??

  Header note I found on the implementation of UCS for mulitcast NLBL:

  Microsoft NLB can be deployed in 3 modes:

  Unicast

  Multicast

  IGMP multicast

  For series B UCS deployments, we have seen that the multicast and IGMP multicast work.

  IGMP multicast mode seems to be the more reliable deployment mode.

  To do this, the monitoring settings:

  All NLB Microsoft value "Multicast IGMP" nodes.  Important!  Check ths by logging into EACH node independently.  Do not rely on the MMC of NLB snap.

  An IGMP applicant must be present on the VLAN of NLB.  If PIM is enabled on the VIRTUAL LAN that is your interrogator.  UCS cannot function as applicant IGMP.  If an interrogator of functioning is not present, NLB IGMP mode will not work.

  You must have a static ARP entry on cheating it upstream pointing IP address Unicast NLB on the multicast MAC address NETWORK load balancing.  This need will set up, of course, on the VLAN of the NLB VIP. The key is that the routing for the NLB VLAN interface must use this ARP entry as a unicast IP ARP response may not contain a multicast mac address. (Violation of the RFC 1812)  Hosts on the NLB VLAN must also use the static entry.  You may have several entries ARP.  IOS can use a function of 'alias' of ARP. (Google it.)

  How Microsoft NLB works. -The truncated for brevity Mac addresses.

  TOPOLOGY OF NLB MS

  NETWORK VLAN 10 = subnet 10.1.1.0/24 IP load balancing

  VIP = 10.1.1.10 NETWORK LOAD BALANCING

  Arp entry static switch advanced IP 10.1.1.10 upstream to MAC 01

  NLB VIP (MAC 01, IP 10.1.1.10)

  NODE-A (AA, MAC IP:10.1.1.88)

  NŒUD-B (MAC BB, IP:10.1.1.99)

  Using the IGMP snooping and interrogator VLAN snooping table is filled with the mac NLB address and groups pointing to the appropriate L2 ports.

  MS NLB nodes will send the responses of IGMP queries.

  This snooping table could take 30 to 60 seconds to complete.

  Host on VLAN 200 (10.200.1.35) sends traffic to NETWORK VIP (10.1.1.10) load balancing

  It goes of course to VLAN 10 interface that uses the static ARP entry to resolve to address MAC 01 VIP NETWORK load balancing.

  Since it is a multicast frame destination it will be forward by the IGMP snooping table.

  The framework will arrive at ALL NLB nodes. (NŒUD-A & NŒUD-B)

  NLB nodes will use its load balancing algorithm to determine which node will manage the TCP session.

  Only one NLB node will respond to this host with TCP ACK to start the session.

  NOTES

  This works in a VMware with N1k, standard vSwtich and vDS environment. Where surveillance IGMP is not enabled, the framing for VIP MAC NETWORK load balancing will be flooded.

  NLB can only work with TCP-based services.

  As stated previously mapping an IP unicast to a multicast mac address is a violation implied by RFC 1812.

  TROUBLESHOOTING

  Make sure your interrogator is working. Just to clarify that this does not mean that it is actually at work.

  Wireshark lets check that IGMP queries are received by the NLB nodes.

  Make sure that the ARP response works as expected.  Once Wireshark again is your friend.

  Look at the paintings IGMP snooping. Validate the L2 ports appearing as expected.

  CSCtx27555 [Bug-preview for CSCtx27555] Unknown multicast with destination outside the range MAC 01:xx: are deleted. (6200 FI fixed in 2.0.2m)

  IGMP mode not affected.

  CSCtx27555    Unknown multicast with destination outside the range MAC 01:xx: are deleted.

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtx27555

  fixed in 2.0(2m)

  Solution: Change the NLB mode of operation of "Multicast" to "multicast IGMP', which modifies balancing load NETWORK VIP MAC at 0100.5exx.xxx Beach, allows to transfer occur as expected.

  Q: and if I switch to switch mode, which means all of the profile and the settings on the servers are completely exhausted and I need to recreate them. ???

  A:Cisco Unified Computing System Ethernet switching Modes

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns224/ns944/whitepaper_c11-701962.html

  -There is no impact on the configuration, you have done service profiles.  they will continue to work as expected.  Mode selector has the FI behave more like a conventional switch.  Most notable is that Spanning tree will be activated and if you have several uplinks yew, tree covering weight will begin to block redundant paths.

  You need to review your topology and what impact tree covering weight.  Generally, we at the switch port upstream defined as "edge master", you want to delete this line.

  For pre-production and laboratory environment, PDI can help qualified with the planning, design and implementation partners.  Given to review the IDP site and open a case if you need more detailed assistance.

• Can someone tell me what the recommendation of Oracle is on how to best configure the load balancer?

  We are currently using the "configuration.properties" file to identify load balancing our servers, but we are curious to see if it is the recommended method to configure load balancing, or if there is a better way.

  I opened a case with Oracle support and asked the same questions - entry configuration.properties of the file servers is the only supported method used by Peoplesoft to balancing upward through 8.54.

  See also: how the Installer Application Server Load balancing and failover (Doc ID 1252846.1)

• Maxum interfaces for the load balancing wan

  Hi all

  You know the interfaces maximum wan that I can use for load balancing?

  Hi Iimran,

  Lets say your sonicwall has N interfaces. You can use the interfaces wan (N-1) for load balancing

  Kind regards

  Barath R

  #IWork4Dell

• Guard application launch at the start of the appliance, also need advice for the implementation of network methods

  Hi all

  I'm new to the development of Blackberry and I'm writing a relatively simple application to run on 7.1.

  So far the development was interesting, I managed to create my user interface using resources online (mainly this forum), but today I tried to implement some of the network classes that I need and now I just met constant problems.

  I use Eclipse SDK 3.7.2 (the one that comes with the plugin RIM)

  First question:

  I'm not sure what I changed, but today I noticed that whenever I start the Simulator (by sim 9360) my application is started during the initial startup process. I don't think he did this before, but to be honest, I wasn't paying much attention. I think it starts at the start of the device is because I put a breakpoint in the constructor for my class from the main screen, which is hit before the Simulator happens even to the point where it is ready for user interaction. In addition, once it is ready, if I press the BB button, I see my registered application.

  I don't have it set to automatic start in .xml descriptior enforcement.

  I started this application on the HelloBlackBerry sample, here is my main method for the entry of the application:

  public static void main( String[] args ) {
          appSettings = AppSettings.fetch();
          // Create a new instance of the application and make the currently
          // running thread the application's event dispatch thread.
          HelloBlackBerry theApp = new HelloBlackBerry();
          theApp.enterEventDispatcher();
          //openConnection();
  
      }
  
  
  

  As far as I know, this is the only entry point for the application.

  More code

      public HelloBlackBerry() {
          // Push a screen onto the UI stack for rendering.
          mainScreen = new ScreenHelloBlackBerry();
          pushScreen( mainScreen );
      }
  

  Here is the method of. my class AppSettings fetch()

      // Retrieves a copy of the effective properties set from storage.
      public static AppSettings fetch()
      {
          AppSettings savedSettings = (AppSettings) _store.getContents();
          return new AppSettings(savedSettings);
      }
  

  Some of this code that I wrote myself, the persistence store cause the launch of my car?

  I tried to reset the Simulator to the factory settings, no change.

  All applications initialized during the startup of the device and then closed shortly after?

  Part 2: Need advice for the implementation of functions of network in the application

  I need to implement some methods that will retrieve data from a web service, and I also need to send data to this service. What I've read, the ConnectionFactory is the way to go. I want my application to make a request when the application is open and can check on a set interval. I didn't know exactly how to go about adding another thread for networking, I understand that network connections should not be created on the thread main event, so I tried to do this:

  The constructor of my class that implements screen (ScreenHelloBlackBerry), I use the following to create a modal dialog box to prompt the user for a username, I also try networking wire in the same segment of spawning:

          public ScreenHelloBlackBerry(){...initialize fields and managers, add it all together...then near the end
  
  //This will open the confirm dialog when the application is launched
          UiApplication.getUiApplication().invokeLater(new Runnable() {
                public void run() {
                    openConfirmDialog();
                  //start connection - Possibly broken
                    ConnectionThread ct = new ConnectionThread();
                    ct.start();
                }
          });
  

  I don't know if it's somehow OK to do, but it seems to work for what I need. I want a user who launches the application at the prompt, and if a user switch applications, when they come back they wondered again (unless they close the app and reopen it).

  Here is my ConnectionThread:

  public class ConnectionThread extends Thread
  {
  
      public void run()
      {
  
            ConnectionFactory connFact = new ConnectionFactory();
            ConnectionDescriptor connDesc;
            connDesc = connFact.getConnection("http://www.google.com");
            if (connDesc != null)
            {
                HttpConnection httpConn;
                httpConn = (HttpConnection)connDesc.getConnection();
                try
                {
                    final int iResponseCode = httpConn.getResponseCode();
                    UiApplication.getUiApplication().invokeLater(new Runnable()
                    {
                        public void run()
                        {
                            Dialog.alert("Response code: " +
                                          Integer.toString(iResponseCode));
  
                        }
                     });
                    httpConn.close();
  
                 }
                 catch (IOException e)
                 {
                   System.err.println("Caught IOException: "
                        + e.getMessage());
                 }
            }
      }
  }
  

  At the moment it has basically unmodified code from a sample that I found, I'll be retooling to meet my needs whenever I can make it work. I HAD this work to the point where, after the closed user confirm this dialog, a few moments later a an alert dialog appears with the 302 response code. I don't know what changed, but now it doesn't work at all, and if I try to scroll with the debugger, I can't past the httpCon.getResponseCode (). I've seen some mistakes earlier on "no record of service was set up", and I also had once a timeout exception.

  I'm sure I'm doing this wrong, but at the same time as I said WAS working, and now it is not. If someone has done this far, thank you very much for your time and advice are much appreciated.

  Also, should I try to start the thread of the network of the UIApplication class instead of the screen? There is currently very little happening in the class that extends UIApplication, do I spend most of my business logic out of the class of the screen and in the UIApplication class?

  Thanks in advance!

  Hi all

  Just to conclude this topic for those who are interested, I found an excellent guide to the implementation of networks in applications of BB, click here for a link.

  About my application being started at the start of the simulator of the device, I found that on a device real this behavior is not complied with, and in addition, the behaviour seems to have stopped after uninstallation and reinstallation of my Simulator.

  See you soon,.

• Double balancing while NAT is based on the load ISP

  Please send me an example configuration for dual ISP load balancing while NAT is running.

  ollyahmed,

  If you are looking specifically for a router, then the following configuration would be good.

  There is a quick need to change the configuration depending on the type of configuration you use, I mean (QOS policy, follow-up (ip SLAs) and route directions.

  version 15.2
  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  IP cef

  !

  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel

  !

  track 1 accessibility of als 1 ip

  !

  Track 2 accessibility of ALS 2 ip

  !

  class-map correspondence Skype

  Skype Protocol game

  !

  Skype-political policy-map

  class Skype

  DSCP ef Set

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  Description of the IP LAN 10.0.0.1 255.255.254.0 nat ip in ip virtual-reassembly speed automatic duplex

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  TASK description

  address IP 213.192.65.106 255.255.255.252 ip access-group 101 in ip nat outside ip virtual-reassembly in crypto of automatic speed auto two-sided map political GLIWICE-map service entry out of service-policy Skype-Skype-strategy

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/2

  Description of the "Wit-NET" 0030.4f61.5521 193.107.215.133 mac address ip address 255.255.255.224 ip access-group 101 in ip nat outside ip virtual-reassembly speed automatic duplex
  !

  IP default-gateway 213.192.65.105 ip forward-Protocol nd

  IP nat inside source map route nat_isp1 interface GigabitEthernet0/1 overload ip nat inside source route nat_isp2 interface GigabitEthernet0/2 overhead map

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.0.0.24 777 193.107.215.133 777 extensible ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.0.2 1723 193.107.215.133 1723 extensible ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.0.24 213.192.36.106 777 777 stretch
  ! - the more static routes has been omitted.

  Route IP default-network 213.192.65.105 ip 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 213.192.65.105 track 1

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 193.107.215.129 track 2

  ALS IP 1

  echo ICMP - 213.192.65.105 source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1
  threshold frequency 2 1000 5 timeout

  IP SLA annex 1 point of life to always start-time now

  IP sla 2 icmp echo - 193.107.215.129 source-interface GigabitEthernet0/2 threshold 2 timeout 1000 frequency 5

  IP SLA annex 2 to always start-time life now

  !

  access-list 110 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.1.255 10.0.100.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 110 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.1.255 ip 10.0.0.0 allow any access list of 190 0.0.1.255 10.0.100.0 0.0.0.255

  SPECIAL route-map permit 10
  corresponds to the IP 110

  is the interface GigabitEthernet0/1!

  map of route track_isp permit 10 match ip address 101 game interface GigabitEthernet0/1 set ip next-hop 213.192.65.105

  !

  track_isp allowed 20 match ip route map address 102 game interface GigabitEthernet0/2 set ip next-hop 193.107.215.129! map of route nat_isp2 permit 10 match ip address 110 game interface GigabitEthernet0/2! map of route nat_isp1 permit 10 match ip address 110 game interface GigabitEthernet0/1! -See more at: https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11710646/dual-isp-connection-...

• Hyperion 11.1.2.1 load balancing

  Hi all

  We intend to set up load with 11.1.2.1 balancing version.

  Server1 - Foundation, planning, Reporting

  Server2 - Foundation, planning, Reporting

  Server3 - HFM and FDM

  Server4 - HFM and FDM

  Server5 - database, Essbase (linux)

  Previously, we planning but load balancing has ever done foundation, hfm and fdm load balancing. So, need some suggestions before you start this process.

  For planning, we have installed planning (Server1 and Server2). In weblogic, we got 2 managed servers Planning0 and planning of the depenses1.

  By default the Round robin method, taken in load balancing.

  But the case of Foundation also, can we follow same process?

  can we use weblogic even serever1 only for all servers or can we install 2 servers weblogic 2 servers (server1, server2), where we plan to install Foundation?

  Thank you

  Mady

  You follow the same process you did for planning, weblogic will be installed by default on all servers, you can use the same domain server and weblogic administrator.

  Run the server configuration web foundation once completed.

  See you soon

  John

• How do I see the actual clients in Apache access.log ip address when front-end is a load balancer.

  Dear.

  I use ebs 12.1.3 and db 11.2.0.3 OS OUL5x64

  in one applTier, I could see the ip address of the clients when they connect to the system in the access_log but

  with the average level has 2 servers AP1/AP2 configure with a LoadBalancer in front.

  verifying the connection in the Apache log file (access_log.1410393600) we see that the balancer IP address of load.

  Please let know us if he died to set up so that I can see in file access_log which client (Ip address) connected to Server (AP1 or AP2)

  Thanks in advance.

  Concerning

  Please see (how to show the Client IP address in The Access Log when using A load balancer (Doc ID 1355549.1)).

  Thank you

  Hussein

• Application loader is to expire instead of loading the new binary

  I got an update of the app and a new application rejected because she did not work in 8 IOS (which came out while my applications were in short - no luck!) I have rebuilt the new app that works very well on my ipad. Then I tried to download through the application loader, but it expires only (no error code). I got the last application loader, Version 3.0 (620), but this also expires and does not accept the application. Yes, I'm trying to send the file zip (not the ipa by mistake). I tried all hours of the day and night for 3 days without success. Help, please.

  One thing to try is to go download the latest version of the App Loader that came out today. If that doesn't fix it, you will need to contact the Support Apple Developer. Application loader is their tool and we have no control over it.

  Neil

• How to keep a virtual machine on a different host to another load balancing virtual computer

  I have two virtual computers (servers) that I use for the application load balancing and I don't want nor server/VM to finish on the same host at any time.   Balancing of the DRS is used in our vSphere environment.  What is the best way to implement?

  Yes that's what I was talking about-

  You can control the placement of virtual machines on the hosts in a cluster using Affinity rules.

  You can create two types of rules.

  VM HOST affinity - specify affinity or anti-affinite between a group of VMS and a group of guests. An affinity rule specifies that the members of a selected group virtual machine DRS may or must be running on a specific host DRS group. An anti-home rule specifies that the members of a selected group virtual machine DRS cannot run on a specific host of the DRS group members.

  Affinity of machine VM-virtual - specify affinity or an anti-affinite between each of the virtual machines. A rule specifying the affinity causes DRS to try to keep the specified virtual machines together on the same host, for example, for performance reasons. With a rule anti-xxx, DRS tries to keep the specified virtual machines, for example, so that when a problem arises with a host, you do not lose the two virtual machines.

  Agic, the Guide to management resources - http://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-50/topic/com.vmware.ICbase/PDF/vsphere-esxi-vcenter-server-50-resource-management-guide.pdf Page 75 for more information-

• manual load balancing or tnsnames load balancing

  Hussein,
  
  We have 2 nodes apps (apps1 and apps2 both on a separate machine) connection to a database of cars 2 nodes (db1 and db2 both on a separate machine).
  We want to apply the load balancing across 2 application servers. I "heard" can be actually using the tnsnames.ora load balancer? Or I'm just out of this world. :)
  
  Thank you very much
  
  Ms. K

  Salvation;

  Please check below and see its helpful:

  11i RAC JDBC & listener Load Balancing Configuration [244366.1 ID]
  Implementation of load balancing across Oracle eBusiness Suite - Documentation specific Load Balancer Hardware [ID 727171.1]
  In 11i [ID 148516.1] load balancing
  How http://ID to ensure the load balancing of concurrent process CFP - RAC Configuration Manager 762024.1
  Configuration of 11i for balancing [ID 117421.1]
  JSP error after implementing [ID 269208.1] JDBC load balancing
  How to configure the load balancer for Workflow 2.6.3 [ID 311803.1]

  Respect of
  HELIOS

• NETWORK load balancing issues

  Hi all

  It is a strange and I can't really find anything when searching. I just wanted to know if other people have seen this? and if there is a work around?

  OK, the virtual environment that I administer is quiet large and the love windows NLB developers where I prefer f5 or hardware NLB. So it is quiet assign windows NETWORK load balancing clusters in the virtual environment, the issue I encountered is if the critical path for an application passes a cluster nlb to another (so they talk to each other). If a node of each of these clusters is on the same physical host NLB rocking.

  Why?

  well windows NLB when a request is sent to the VIP address all nodes in the cluster must meet before it is executed by one of the nodes, tests that I've found is that if a node of each group is on the same host demand seams to stay internal to the ESX host, as it goes, I know where that IP address is and goes to a single node until that node is waiting for the other nodes of the cluster in order to recognize the request but they never get it the whole thing stopped and happens to expire and the performed by the team of network packet capture won't let even the host he sews.

  OK, a few rules affinity could solve this but I'm talking about 8 knots, talking to a node 4 cluster which then in turn talk to another cluster of 4 knots and im talking about another 50 like that until the point where DRS. can not move whatever it is as well that the rules are a nightmare administrave especially since only 2 machines can be in a rule.

  All hosts running ESX 4 Update 1 and running on HP blades, unfortunately we run on unicast mode, due to the size of the environment networks don't want to or can't add all switches/routers arp entries. It is configured as recommended by using unicast.

  I can reproduce this problem every time still in test. would it be because of the unicast? I don't see how.

  I would add also that it should not be 2 nlb cluster, if a server client attempts to hit the VIP of a windows NETWORK load balancing cluster and it is on the same host as one of the nodes it will expire as a single node gets applications. F5 NLB works perfectly, and when they are on hosts separate windows THAT NLB works very well also.

  Just came across this because the jobs would come about the application does not, by trying to hit the vip on the correct port for the requesting server, it wouldn't connect and the support guys would vmotion a knot and it would usually fix the issue, and if it does not pass all the nodes on the same esx host and it would work every time (I know (, but until the full time vmware resources came on board as me not doubtful we had the time to really watch)

  any ideas or comments would be great hope I have explianed the question clearly enough

  See you soon

  See: http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/implmenting_ms_network_load_balancing.pdf

  You must use the multicast.

  André

• With forms 10g server load balancing

  Hello
  
  I have a client who is just now dealing with a migration from a platform of client-server 6i (using Terminal servers) to a platform of web forms 10 g with several application 10 g standalone servers.
  
  In the end, customer wants to activate load balancing in order to have some manage to each application server workload.
  
  The idea to accomplish is to have a hardware load balancer. The customer has already a CISCO CSS 11503 SSL.
  Is there a documentation where I can check more info on compatibility/configuration for this architecture.
  
  Thank you for your attention.
  
  Kind regards
  Pedro Ribeiro

  You can check this doc link: [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_19/hpux.1012/install.1012/install/toc.htm]
  It say everything and anything mention on a load balancer, but I'll try to keep the research.

  Greetings.

• SRW2008 load balancing

  Hi, what is the best way to balance the two connectrions with SRW2008 internet? Is possible to also "switch"?

  Thank you in advace

  Nino

  Aggregation of links (sometimes called "Bundling") combines two or more physical ports into a single logical port. After that, you have only one logical port. This allows you to increase the bandwidth on a link. To use it, you must connect the ports combined in another switch/device that supports the same and has the same configuration.

  So, Yes to use the aggregation of links, you'll need another switch like the SRW2008.

  However, the aggregation of links isn't load balancing. The logical port is still a single connection, even if it's running on multiple threads. It must connect to the same physical device.