I'm a little confused on what view "Security Server" is...

Similar Questions

• javaw.exe missing on view Security Server - view 6.2.1

  Hello

  I'm trying to associate a view Security Server with a connection to the server (point 6.2.1).  Both servers run Windows 2012 r2 and ran into a new error (for me anyway).

  I have install the matching password, and when I go to install the Security Server component, I get an error of coupling .  I can access the server from the server security with https connection and think that other DMZ Firewall rules are configured correctly.

  Looking through the papers, I find a mistake on not being javaw.exe is not a recognized command.  I drill down to the path of the log entry and find that javaw.exe is not where it seems expected.  It seems to be a dynamic path created by the installation process

  serverInstUtil : 18/12/15 10:15:11 lancement « « C:\Users\ADMINA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{E9740BB3-641F-492D-8B76-802FA34C778F}~setup\unpack\program files\VMware View\Server\jre\bin\javaw.exe »-Dcom.vmware.vdi.orchestratorj.nativelib=ws_java_nativeNODEP-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true-Djava.library.path="C:\Users\ADMINA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{E9740BB3-641F-492D-8B76-802FA34C778F}~setup\unpack\program files\VMware View\Server\bin » -cp « C:\Users\ADMINA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{E9740BB3-641F-492D-8B76-802FA34C778F}~setup\unpack\program files\VMware View\Server\sslgateway\lib\ * » ; «C:\Users\ADMINA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{E9740BB3-641F-492D-8B76-802FA34C778F}~setup\unpack\program files\VMware View\Server\lib\ * «;» check the 8009 "C:\Users\ADMINA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{E9740BB3-641F-492D-8B76-802FA34C778F}~setup\cache" com.vmware.vdi.tunnelpairing.XmlAjpClientNew 10.97.1.129 ".

  serverInstUtil: 18/12/15 10:15:11 Matching of Java SS returned cheque ' ' C:\Users\ADMINA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{E9740BB3-641F-492D-8B76-802FA34C778F}~setup\unpack\program files\VMware View\Server\jre\bin\javaw.exe "' is not recognized as an internal or external command ".

  serverInstUtil: 18/12/15 10:15:11 ERROR: an unexpected error occurred while determining if advanced Security Server matching is supported

  I used this binary installer to install the server of connection corresponding without problem I've noticed so far.  I just downloaded the 6.2.1 installers yesterday (17/12/15) and the files are dated 08/12/15.   I have not found any related to the release notes for this version, or in the installation guide.

  I can certainly install java runtime and copy the files in place (although I do not know what version).

  Any suggestions or ideas?

  File this one, by virtue of be sure to double check...

  I have disabled UAC, re-directed the installer - the same error.

  I saw the event log and has detected an error (event ID 11335) MSIInstaller

  Product: VMware Horizon 6 connection Server - Error 1335. The file ' Replic ~ 1.cab ' required for this installation is damaged and cannot be used. This may indicate a network error, an error reading from the CD-ROM, or a problem with this package.

  It turns out that it was the MSI. When I have re-uploaded the file, it works beautifully.   I had just used this file 10 minutes before.  Will show measure twice... really does matter

  Save this here for others to avoid my mistake ;-)

• One of my view security server shows as "unknown" in Administrator dashboard view

  Hello

  One of my view security server (view Horizon 5.2) shows as UNKNOWN in Administrator dashboard view.

  I tried with the declared, rebooted Server services restart, still no luck.

  The stated server is accessible via RDP and the Services are running.

  Can someone help me on this?

  This problem has been resolved by disabling Windows NLB NETWORK adapter settings.

  We used Windows NLB long back for security servers, recently we removed view Security Server NLB Windows and place in F5 load balancing.

  Not sure for some reason, the Windows NETWORK load balancing service came active, disabled, and the problem solved.

• View security server 404 error - access external Office

  Hi all

  I am a security view in our gateway server deployment and for purposes of test base, we use a self-signed on view security server certificate.

  We are trying to access the external address and the following error.

  

  When you view the web address, we see the following error.

  

  The current set in place is that https traffic (443) intervenes, it strikes at our front door that transfers the SSL and port 80 traffic hits the view Security Server.

  I suspect that this could be a sort of issue of the certificate, or a configuration parameter missing.

  Any advice would be much appreciated.

  Thank you

  Gary.

  I wish that I could provide more assistance, but I do not have an F5 and yet I found the deployment guide that you have already gone through.  The section with the changes necessary for starting servers F5 and safety on page 8.  The only thing that caught my attention was that you need to configure the file locked.properties for servers that require http

  http://www.F5.com/PDF/deployment-guides/VMware-view5-IAPP-DG.PDF

• View security server - remote access

  We seek to deploy the view. Our security team has some concerns using the view security gateway. Hey im running a windows device and its compromises and someone has remote access to it. Launch the client discovers that someone can see what im doing in the poster session?

  If we were to go down the road of SSL VPN, we could disable the split tunneling, and that should take care of the question but I'd like to be able to use PCoIP. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

  Have not heard this concern before but I think it boils down to what you hear with access remotely.

  If the remote access means that someone managed to install a VNC server on your client, and then connect to the server while you are on the view Session then Yes, it would be able to see what you're doing.

  If remote access means drop one level then no.

  You can still use PCoIP with a VPN client, if that is your main concern.

  Linjo

• Unable to connect to the host via VMWare View Security Server 4

  I have installed and configured the VMWare View connection server and can connect to the virtual machine (Windows XP Pro) shareed via the customer to view without a problem. The problem Im having is that I have configured the Security server in my zone demilitarized and authorized the appropriate DMZ ports and the port 80 and 443 to the outside on my DMZ. Access the public URL and he invites me to authenticate what I do and it then publishes my office pool. I click to connect to the shared pool and it says connection for about 5 drops of s and then just my connection. Now, if I go to my security on my DMZ server, I can connect to the thin desktop via RDP.

  Thank you

  eeg3 is correct if you have a direct connection enabled on the broker for connections paired with security server then you would be forced to open 3389 to the outside world since the workstations would try to connect directly to the desktop.    The right way to go forward is to create the replica with disabled direct connection and combine security with this box server.

  If you have found this device or any other useful post please consider the use of buttons useful/correct to award points

• Unable to connect to view Security Server 5.0

  Use vmware view client build horizon 2.1.0 1213173 (ubuntu 12.04 64-bit), when I tried to login (local network), I got timeout message

  I can connect if server connection hollow instead of security server connection

  one mistake that I find on security server is 33, SideBySide error

  no errors not found on the page of the web interface of the login server events

  Here is the output of scan nmap from client to server security

  from Nmap 5.21 ( http://nmap.org ) 2013-11-06 15:13 MYT

  Scan nmap for view.cnc.net.my (10.1.1.20) report

  Host is (0.00017 s latency).

  Not shown: 988 closed ports

  SERVICE OF THE PORT STATE

  53/tcp open domain

  80/tcp open http

  135/tcp open msrpc

  139/tcp open netbios-ssn

  443/tcp open https

  445/tcp open microsoft-ds

  3389/tcp open ms-word-serv

  49152/tcp open unknown

  49153/tcp open unknown

  49154/tcp open unknown

  49155/tcp open unknown

  49167/tcp open unknown

  MAC address: 00:50:56:87:35:FF (VMware)

  Do not check everything again: you cannot log in because you can't solve. It can be solved, either replace the connection URL in the configuration of the IP address instead of FULL domain name, which I do not recommend since the certificate cannot be based on IP addresses...

  When you receive a message "Server (null)", it is because the server name cannot be resolved by the client. The reason why you configure server security <->Server with IP addresses tunnel connection is because they may not be able to resolve the FULL of the other domain name.

  The PCoIP gateway feature is enabled on the servers of your connection? It may be useful if you send us pictures of your configuration (security servers and connection)

• View Security Server installation issue 5.2

  I try to get my security server upward and running for 2 days now and continues to run into a brick wall.  I always get the following error:

  Error 28083.  Failed installation of IPsec. Please see the C:\users\...\...\vminst.log file for more details.  The journal reveals 'error: could not get a satisfactory response from the connection to the server after the installation of IPsec "

  In an effort to solve the problem, I welcomed the Windows Firewall on the Security Server and the connection to the server to allow all incoming connections.

  I checked that all the Back-End firewall configurations are correct and functioning as required.

  I scrolls http://communities.vmware.com/thread/405121?start=15 & tstart = 0 and made the changes recommended in this thread.

  When I remove completely all GPOS from the connection to the server, then I can successfully create the pairing between the server security and the connection to the server.

  Most of the people looks like it's a start for GPO setting to walk through them.  Well, I have several GPO that is applied in order to be compliant STIG.

  What I'm looking for is, can someone please point me in the right direction as to what the parameters might affect IPsec communication between the 2 boxes?

  Thanks for the help.

  After calling and by opening a ticket with VMware, it seems that I was able to successfully install the Security server.  After they looked through different GPO settings several that have been applied, I changed the setting below and has been able to correctly install after you run gpupdate/force on my login server.

  Options Configuration/policies/Windows Settings / Security Settings / Local Policies/Security / Cryptography system system cryptography: Use FIPS compatible algorithms for encryption, hashing, and signing

  My setting has been activated.  I changed it to disabled and it seemed to solve the current problem.

• VMware View Security Server DMZ

  Hello!

  We are currently developing a small installation of VMware View in our office as a CEP and I have a question about the server security and the need for the ports against customers.

  Our facility:

  (Active Directory and RADIUS) 2-factor authentication

  Front End FW

  Security on the DMZ server

  Backend FW

  Connection to the server

  The question I have is:

  4172TCP/UDP port 3389 be open from the Security server to customers?

  Is there no way of this tunnel since the Security server through the connection to the server on the inside?

  Thank you

  Kenth

  Hej Kenta.

  You are right, there is currently no way to tunnel on the dry-server and the connection broker using PCoIP, you can only create a tunnel through one.

  So that means you need to open TCP/UDP 4172 between dry-server and desktop computers-view.

  Joel

• Extra license is required to view security server

  Hi, we have a Vmware Academic View4 first bundle only this configuration of a server to view security or additional license coverage there?

  Thank you

  Robert

  No additional license is required to see Security Server. It is included in the General view license.

  Mark

• Windows 2003 R2 view security server of Service Tunnel has failed and is marked as critical

  Hello world

  After a few weeks the server does not start the service tunnel.

  the server workes normally after the first reboot. This server is located in the demilitarized zone.

  can anyone help

  THX

  Mike

  Event type: WARNING

  Event source: VMware View

  Event category: VMware View

  Event ID: 104

  Date: 01.02.2010

  Time: 21:52:31

  User: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM

  Computer: xxx

  Description:

  The 'tunnelService' service has failed and is marked as critical, closing

  Event type: error

  Event source: VMware View

  Event category: VMware View

  Event ID: 105

  Date: 01.02.2010

  Time: 21:52:31

  User: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM

  Computer: xxx

  Description:

  Not able to create the com.vmware.vdi.ice.server.JMXServer.main(SourceFile:211) MBean server

  javax.management.MBeanException: Exception thrown in the startServer operation

  at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.StandardMetaDataImpl.invoke(StandardMetaDataImpl.java:435)

  at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.MetaDataImpl.invoke(MetaDataImpl.java:220)

  at com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.invoke(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:815)

  at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.JmxMBeanServer.invoke(JmxMBeanServer.java:784)

  at com.vmware.vdi.ice.server.JMXServer.main(SourceFile:209)

  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0 (Native Method)

  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)

  at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)

  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)

  at net.propero.workspace.windowsinfrastructure.tunnelservice.TunnelService.run(SourceFile:34)

  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)

  Caused by: java.lang.Exception: ice start: address already in use: bind

  at com.vmware.vdi.ice.server.Ice.startServer(SourceFile:695)

  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0 (Native Method)

  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)

  at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)

  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)

  at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.StandardMetaDataImpl.invoke(StandardMetaDataImpl.java:414)

  ... more than 10

  It seems that you have another service running on port 443. (From your error message "Address already in use")

  Recently installed an IIS or something similar on the machine?

  Best regards

  Linjo

  If you find this information useful, please give points to "correct" or "useful".

• Customer display 5.0.0 and compatibility view connection server 5.1

  Curently we run see 5.0.0 eviorment but we are planing an upgrade in 5.1 mode and I'm a little confused abut compatibility view 5.1 server connection and view customer 5.0.0.

  Here in this compatibility matrix, it seems that customer 5.0.0 and 5.1 server are compatible.

  
  And here, in this compatibility matrix, it looks like this only 5.01 client is compatible with Server 5.1

  

  So if I upgrade the servers to connect to 5.1 will be users with 5.0.0 customers still able to connect to their desktop?

  Best regards, Primoz

  Customer display 5.0 is compatible with the 5.1 server connection; However, the 4.x clients are not. That's what you see above.

• VMware View 5 Security Server

  Hey guys,.

  I have a problem with the Security server. I have installed A Windows Server 2008R2 in the DMZ.
  To install the view security server, the Win2k8R2 must be in the field. This does not work because the server is in the demilitarized zone. How can I get the server to the domain?

  Without doubt, I need to open ports... But wich ports i open?

  and is not a security risk to open ports on the DC?

  Or is there another option?

  Best regards
  Best regards

  There is no requirement for a security to a member of the domain server, these controls was only for the connection to the server or replica server role when you run the Setup program. You will need various open ports for connection server that you are to match, those that are detailed in the documentation under https://www.vmware.com/support/pubs/view_pubs.html

• VMware View 5.1.1 Security Server LDAP errors

  Im having a serious amount of errors on my VMware View (5.1.1) security server

  Log debugging shows a large amount of LDAP errors, see below.

  2012-09 - 06T 10: 46:49.075 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0940) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 11: 01:50.102 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0CB8) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 11: 16:50.109 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0FE8) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 11: 31:51.120 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0DD8) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 11: 46:51.132 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0244) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 12: 01:52.159 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0F3C) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 12: 16:52.155 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0E5C) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 12: 31:53.182 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0F68) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 12: 46:53.194 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-092 C) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 13: 01:54.217 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-08E4) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE
  2012-09 - 06T 13: 16:54.227 + 02:00 ERROR (0610-0504) < WSAdminDomainTimerThread > [ws_admin] cannot bind to LDAP://rootDSE

  Anyone got any suggestions?

  Hello

  The plugin ws_admin trying to make field checks every 15 minutes, but given that your security server is not on the field these checks fail. It is completely harmless, but they should not run in first place, I raised this in their own country.

  Mike

  Edit:

  There is a simple solution for this in 5.1.x:

  Under the current registry key HKLM\Software\VMware, Inc. \VMware VDM\plugins\wsnm\admin, create a new key named Params, and under that a new DWORD value named InitiateDomainChecks with 0 data. Once set, you will need to restart the VMware View Security Server service for the change to take effect.

• Peripheral NAT between Security Server and Connection Manager - View 4.6

  Hi all

  I'm trying to deploy a view environment 4.6 - with a view Security Server in the DMZ.

  The DMZ is a NAT entirely would be and isolated network (single firewall, configuration 3-leg-GB-2000 is the model of the firewall).

  
  At this point, just trying to get RDP to work with this configuration.

  The firewall configuration is as follows:

  -Security server IP - 10.1.1.49/24

  -The alias created to view connection server - 10.1.1.100 (NAT IP)

  -Tunnel NAT (with port 8009 and 4001) created between the server connection view and real IP 10.2.2.229 server connection alias

  -The alias created for the view Desktop - 10.1.1.101 (NAT IP)

  -Tunnel NAT (with port 3389) created between Desktop and view real IP Destop 10.2.2.239 view alias

  I can RDP directly since the Security server to the desktop (via the 'alias' 10.1.1.101 IP) view correctly.

  I can connect successfully from the internal network (via IP real office 10.2.2.239).

  When I try to connect via the server of security (from the outside) I get the connection for the initial connection manager, and I choose the pool to connect to. However I'm unable to start a desktop session. The error I get is "the office is currently not available.

  In the event logs on the Manager server connection that I see that the real IP (10.2.2.239) is used to connect to the desktop view - which will not work in this scenario (the 10.1.1.101 alias should be used).

  Has anyone deployed a server of security seen in this scenario?

  Thanks in advance!

  Not sure if it works or not, but there is a GPO that changes the rules to connect using the DNS name.  Is the name DNS returns the correct value, you must connect as?