Interruption material (Usbport Dxgkrnl, Heci) make high CPU

Similar Questions

• unknown material interruptions & DPC causing high CPU usage

  After having hard time find a way to solve this problem

  Please take a look at these links

  http://postimg.org/image/ynx7o0gi1/

  http://postimg.org/image/j3ptxh6dl/

  Thanks for all the entries...

  Hello

  Thanks for posting your question on the Forums of community of Microsoft.
   
  1. don't you make changes to the computer before the show?
  2. What is the brand and model of the computer?
  3. the computer is on a domain network?
   
  These activities [interruptions and DPC] high CPU consumption may indicate a hardware problem or problems with the device driver.
   
  Method 1:
  I suggest you to update the chipset and BIOS drivers on the computer and check if it helps.
  Reference:
  Updated a hardware driver that is not working properly
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/update-a-driver-for-hardware-that-isn ' t-work correctly
  Also, try to download and install the latest chipset and BIOS drivers for the computer from the manufacturer's website.
   
  Method 2:
  I ask you to check if the problem persists after disconnecting all external devices (except keyboard and mouse).

   

  Method 3:

  Run the hardware troubleshooter and devices.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/open-the-hardware-and-devices-Troubleshooter

   

  Method 4:

  Check if the problem occurs in the boot.

  Reference:

  How to perform a clean boot for a problem in Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Windows 8
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

  Note: See "How to reset the computer to start as usual after a clean boot troubleshooting"

  under more information to prepare the computer to start as usual after a repair.

   
  Also check out these links for more information:
   
  Analyzing interrupt and DPC activity
  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc938646.aspx
   
  Follow-up of interruptions
  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc940374.aspx
   
  Start followed by performance guide
  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd744567 (v = ws.10) .aspx
   
  Thank you.

• HP mini5102 interruption using high CPU after sleep / resume

  I have the same problem described recently (without solution) on the Forum of Support HP Business. After resume from sleep, 5102 HPmini consumes constantly about 30% of the capacity of the CPU even with the system at idle. Sunny (0-3% CPU use at idle) before going to sleep. As Roderick Laird (copied below) I've already got rid of wireless assistant that caused a different problem of high CPU usage (100% CPU use even before you sleep / resume, now fixed by an update of the version unless served for those who want to keep the wireless assistant).

  Consumption of futile processor by 30% after standby/sleep is due to material interruptions (revealed by Sysinternals Process Explorer). I understand that may be due to problems such as several drivers attempting to control a device (for example, after a faulty update). But I have no idea how find the offending device or drivers.

  My guess is that many owners of this model simply did not notice the problem and they areassuming the poor performance is due to the atom processor netbook. You must use Task Manager or performance monitor to view CPU usage high, and process Explorer to find it hardware interrupts.

  If anyone has found the cause / solution?

  HP, help to resolve this issue please--nobody wants netbooks HP fall into the category "do not buy" due to persistent problems with the futile CPU usage. The HP mini 5102 is the flagship model!

  Ref:

  "Author subject: HP mini5102 interruption high CPU usage after standby Roderick Laird 24 March 2010 04:03:03 GMT - I see of other HP5102 users having problems with high use of the processor of the Wireless Wizard operation amok; I avoided this by disabling the corresponding services. But one problem remains. The system works beautifully/effectively from a cold start. However, if I go back I think that interruptions are consumes about 35% of the cycles CPU. Not something that I want to pass battery on. I made sure that all the drivers are the latest versions according to the HP support site. I also tried disabling the obvious drivers that might be wrong (wireless, ethernet, audio, non-touchpad mouse)... »

  Update the Intel AHCI 9.6.4.1002 driver (iastor.sys) removes the futile CPU usage after sleep from 30% to 20%. This is not in the drivers of HP, but is available at Intel. Subsequently the chipset driver updates might solve the problem. In the meantime:

  Disabling in BIOS Drivelock completely eliminates the problem!

  Apparently users who want a computer that is useful after sleep / summary to know somehow ignore the advice of stern of HP in the BIOS that Drivelock is recommended for safety.

  It cost a lot of time to resolve, with no whatesover help to be published by HP. My consolation is that by systematically eliminating all the bloatware and other services-waste of unused resources, pilots and scheduled tasks automatically loaded on the system (while trying to find the cause of the CPU / interrupt use) I now have a mini 5102 (SSD) that:

  * Cold boots Win 7 Pro 32 in less than 30 seconds (including wireless access)

  * Stops in less than 8 seconds

  * Beds / back in 1-2 seconds

  * Consumes less than 600 MB of RAM at idle

• Tecra M2 - stop hard on high CPU (turns off with no BSOD)

  Experienced stops consistent when the CPU is running at full during a little while.
  -J' mean 'stops' complete power cut with no blue screen of death where all is lost and the computer must be restarted manually.
  -by "high CPU", I mean when the processor locks to full use such that when you insert a column in a big Excel sheet with errors or if you want a large number of files and you open a video from the network or when you run a registry scan and antivirus analysis at the same time.

  The problem took place regularly for a few months and I can now make a case with greater predictability. Using the hardware monitor suite 'Everest', it seems that the problem occurs when the temperature of the CPU is located at 99 for more than a minute or more.

  This happens with some, but never when batteries run - then attempts to force the error, it will not be stopped if the power cable is released just before the drop point.

  In the cases of the problem, it seems to be a small error message appearing only a fraction of a second before the death of the computer.

  Each reference forum and help that I read would suggest the problem is related material and that the chip or the motherboard is overheating and need replacement. While the laptop is almost 18 months old, I bought a new ' everything except the screen and HDD "earlier this year, and was not prepared to accept the explanation without more tests.

  Kantonix Linux works very well and the CD starts seems to tax the processor as much as the same events that kill for me under XP.

  A few weeks back, I installed Windows XP on a second HARD drive in the Bay of hotswappable and noted the installation seems to work pretty hot computer and he died during the process. It has experienced no difficulties for while but, a few days after moving the HARD drive reinstalled in the primary position and after you have reinstalled a lot a lot of applications, the error started happening again.

  Last night I caught a few fractions of a second before the death, the pulling power and stop the process and allow me to see the error message (as mentioned above):

  -first message came from "TOSHIBA Power Saver" saying "a fatal error occurred at x 06" (not sure about the last bit) ".

  -second message was "THotkey.exe' saying 'could not load powrprof.dll.

  -monitoring of several hundred cases of the second message.

  Because of the error messages, I was not able to get a print screen.

  Solutions or even on ideas that would be very appreciated!

  Post edited by: DC-financial

  Hello

  According to your explanations and the information in your ad, I think that the problem is related to the software.
  You wrote something about energy saving. This Toshiba utility controls the speed of the CPU and the use of cooling modules.
  I think that this request could be responsible by the judgments. Try reinstalling this utility.
  In addition, check the configuration of the unique power plans. If you work only with battery energy saver using another mode of power supply as working on AC.
  I think you could check these consumption patterns and configure it.

  Verification of the cooling module is also not a bad idea. Maybe fans cannot work properly because of the dust and debris inside the books.
  I use the vacuum cleaner to clean the fans. CA? s an easy way to make it free of dust.
  But if you get it, you must be careful.

• DAQmx read results 2 ms/s in high CPU usage

  I have an application that reads the 32 channels of 2 ms/s analog input signals, at the same time. The actual hardware will be: SMU-8135 Win7, chassis SMU-1071, 2 x SMU-6368 (16 channels). The SMU-two 6368 will provide 32 channels data acquisition.

  I don't have the material at the moment, but I've been estimate the processor on the alternative configurations needs, because I have concerns about the use of the CPU to data acquisition high speed. Two alternative configurations are:

  (1) SMU-8133 (quad core) WinXP, SMU-1062 q, PXI-6133.

  (2) PXI-8106 (dual-core) WinXP, PXI-6133, PXI-1042.

  Note: PXI-6133 supports high speed HAVE 2 ms/s, at the same time.

  I wrote a simple continuous data acquisition software to allow me to compare the CPU usage. The sample rate and the number of channels are configurable. What I found is:

  (1) at low sampling frequency, for example 100 kech. / s, the CPU usage is minimal on both configurations (bicoeur or image), regardless of the number of channels is 1 or 8. The reading of the CPU was about 1-4%

  (2) at high sampling frequency, for example 2 ms/s, what is the number of channels used, either 1 or 8, the CPU utilization was 50% for dual core and 25% for the quad core, IE. a full core has been fully utilized.

  (3) the passage of the low use of the processor (<5%) to="" high="" cpu="" usage="" (="">45%) increases when the sampling rate is rather steep and shows interesting channel-dependence (note the following has been achieved with a PXI-8106 controller, dual-core).

  • @1 channel, it happened between 950 to 970 k
  • @2 channels, it happened between 470 to 480 k
  • @4 channels, it happened between 230 to 240 k,.
  • @8 channels, it happened between 120 to 130 k.

  This model reminds me of buffer length related question but I double checked a sufficient length of the buffer was used. He suggested also, surprising a few traffic jams occurred when the amount of data increases up to certain level.

  My question is, is this a problem with this particular card (PXI-6133) or driver DAQmx (9.5.5f4). How the problem is when I'm doing an acquisition of 32 channels?

  For your information, I have attached the benchmarking software.

  Thank you!

  Donghui Yin

  I followed this example code (see link below) and used based on events DAQmx, now the excessive CPU utilization problem has been resolved. Playback from the CPU is now less than 10 percent, while it could be 50% (in the case of dual-core) or 25% (case of hearts) at the same sample rate and number of channels.

  http://zone.NI.com/DevZone/CDA/EPD/p/ID/5911

• High CPU usage by "System outages" and missing keystrokes in IE on all new HP laptop 15-r085nd

  I recently bought a HP15-r085nd (Win 8.1 with Bing), and right out of the box, I encountered this problem:

  After the awakening of the mode (usually after the first time to wake from sleep mode, but always after the second time), the process "System outages" has high utilization of the processor, up to 45%. The laptop then responds very, very slow. In addition, in Internet Explorer (but only in Internet Explorer, it seems!) strikes are missing out.

  I tried the following:

  -Implementation of all the updates of Windows, all McAfee updates and all of the updates from HP Assistent. No results.

  -Reinstall all the drivers, no results. Windows system restore: no result. Factory reset the recovery partition: no result. Then implemented all the updates again: no result.

  -J' tried to use Microsoft Xperf to diagnose the problem: it seems wdf0100.sys to blame for the high CPU usage. (In other words, if I have interpreted the results in the right way).

  -J' then did some troubleshooting with Microsoft Support: they asked me to disable all startup items in the Task Manager and disable all non-Microsoft services in msconfig. The result was that the high CPU usage of "System interrupts" occurred less frequently after the first time out of the way 'sleep', but still she always had after the second time to wake off mode 'sleep'. Uninstallation of McAfee seems to have the same effect, by the way.

  -J' then did some troubleshooting with the store were I bought it. They used a pilot program to install newer versions of the drivers. Also, in vain.

  Then they gave me another laptop of the same model (r085nd). It had exactly the same problems. So I think that all laptops of this model have the same problem! Does anyone know of a similar case with a laptop similar?

  -J' then did some troubleshooting with HP support. We have updated the BIOS (F.24), without result. We have made a few updates to additional drivers on the HP site, no results. We wanted to update the graphic driver Intel HD (sp65598), but we couldn't install it, an error message saying: minimum system requirements were not satisfied.

  I hope that the HP support can arrive at a solution (they wanted to deepen this). If so, I'll promise to post it here, because it affects probably other r085nd HP as well.

  In the mean time, I'd appreciate any suggestions, because I'm totally confused now. Someone at - it ideas? I will answer all the answers!

  I was contacted by HP Support again. After a new series of updates which included some updates everything new on the site of HP is solved the problem with high CPU usage by "system outages"!

  We have done several updates, so I know not that exactly solved the problem, but it is those:

  -New firmware BIOS: version F.33 (my bet would be that is the one that solves the problem)

  -New Intel chipset driver: 1.20 (sp69575.exe)

  -New driver Intel HD Graphics: 1.20 (sp69589.exe): 10.18.10.3958 (this one tried earlier, without solving the problem)

  -New driver Realtek card reader: 1.20Ap3 (sp69610.exe)

  I hope this helps other people with the same problem.

  Thanks to the HP Support team for their help with this problem!

  Moreover, the problem of lack of strikes in Internet Explorer (more use of CPU (any reason), the sequences of keys more are not registered!) still exists! I work around this problem by using Google Chrome. Again, I hope that this issue might get resolved as well! I nevertheless marks it as "Resolved" as the main problem is resolved.

• Windows Explorer high cpu use jn 9

  Computer freezes & I have to restart my computer

  Hello

  (1) do you have made no changes before this problem?
  (2) you receive an error message then the closure of the computer?
   
  Follow the steps from the links below and check if it helps.
   
  Method 1: You can check if the Windows Task Manager also shows high CPU usage. To do this, follow the steps mentioned in the link.
  See details about your computer's performance using Task Manager
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/see-details-about-your-computers-performance-using-Task-Manager

   

  Method 2: Follow the instructions in Internet Explorer 9 from the link below and check if it makes a difference.
  Use the software instead of rendering GPU rendering
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2398082

   
  Method 3: Run the FIXIT from the link below, and if that helps.
  Solve Internet Explorer add-on problems when IE hangs or freezes
  http://support.Microsoft.com/mats/ie_freezes_or_crashes/en-us
   
  Hope this information helps.
   
   

• Use high CPU (35% average) while System Idle process CPU about 98% but frustrated by "[name of the prog] has stopped working".

  Hello

  I am trying to help someone with a laptop HP model g6-1202sa (Windows 7 Home Premium 64 - bit, another record at the end of the post).

  I think that Windows is now updated and drivers, but the problem remains also.

  The laptop has the symptoms mentioned in the title I found the Manager tasks.  Laptop fan is on a large part of the time, and the owner says that, during the execution of something more intensive than Skype for example of internet browsing, they get a warning from Norton on high CPU. Resource monitor shows that system interrupts are on average about 31% CPU.

  The results, I found the task manager has led to some research on Google, which in turn led me to want to run adksetup.exe (Windows Assessment and Deployment Kit) in the hope of discovering if a particular driver is causing the problem. (Various threads on the internet point to what is the way to go).

  However, after downloading adksetup.exe, when I try to launch it I get the initial screen of Toolbox and then 'assessment of Windows and the deployment for Windows 8.1 Kit has stopped working ". (Verification of the solution finally gives the only option to "Close the program").  Similarly, I have now discovered that if I try to look at the properties of the computer, i.e. start > right click on computer > left click on properties, I get "Windows Explorer has stopped working". Do more research on Google I find sometimes I get "Internet Explorer has stopped working" sometimes (Chrome is ok).  More out of curiosity than anything specific I ran AMD VISION Engine Control Center after right click on the desktop and ended with 'Catalyst Control Center; The host Application has stopped working".

  So before going any further, does anyone have any ideas what's happening?   I do not understand the problems 'has stopped working"in safe mode, but the high utilization of the processor with System Idle Process around 98% is still there.  It appears so that I can run adksetup.exe in safe mode while this would be the way to proceed and continue to try to tackle the problem of CPU?

  For the record, some of the things I've done along the way include update of Windows, updating drivers, running the file system (no violation of integrity) checker, a regular chkdsk ("CHKDSK discovered free space marked allocated in the master file table (MFT) bitmap. Correcting errors in the volume bitmap. Windows has made corrections to the file system").  Swapped the only module memory 4GB 2 x 1 GB modules I had to hang out, all the symptoms remained 4 GB then reinstalled.

  Thanks for the tips

  HP g6-1202sa Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

  4 GB of ram

  AMD A4 - 3300M APU with graphics Radeon (TM) HD 1900 MHz

  523 GB of free disk space

  WE

  Since the observer event logs, these are some of the problems

  Software connection of 1 hp mgr is damaged and needs to be installed.  There are literally hundreds (or even thousands of these errors)

  Cannot find the description for the ID of the event source hpCMSrv 5. Either the component that triggers this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair the component on the local computer.

  The failing application name: hpConnectionManager.exe, version: 4.1.23.1, time stamp: 0x4df7dbef

  2 - the description for event ID 0 in source AdvancedSystemCareService8 is not found. Remove

  3 - Media center is corrupt (updated)

  The description for event ID 0 in source MCUpdate is not found. Either the component that triggers this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted.

  Workouts 4 - sky are corupt

  Session "SkyDriveSessionName" was able to start with the following error: 0xC0000022

  5 - the description for the ID of the event source BtFilter 26 is not found

  6 - hundreds of Cvhsvc.exe is a part of the virtualization Client Microsoft Microsoft Office Service... Errors

  The description for event ID 100 from source CVHSVC is not found.

  7. the description of event ID 3057 source client Application Virtualization Client cannot be found.

  As you can see there are at least a dozen of them which are probably related to the high utilization of the processor.

  The drivers are not updated (Bet you checked in the Manager device or with a sweeper driver as app)

  To be honest I don't see how SFC returned no breach of integrity account required to this type of problems.

  It might just be easier to re - install win 7, but I'm happy to help anyway

• Cisco 6500 - WCCP - high CPU

  I'm setting up a stand-alone WAE-7341 engine content ACNS used to webcaching only.

  When I activate the redirect l2 and l2-back on the WAE I get high CPU on my Cisco 6504-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3 b-WS-F6K-PFC3B. The 6500 status of wccp as L2 for redirection and return and webcache work but this CPU spikes at 70%.

  IOS code: s3223-adventerprisek9_wan - mz.122 - 33.SXH7.bin

  MDF-6504 #show proc sort cpu | 0.00 EXC
  CPU utilization for five seconds: 47/45%; 01:00 %; 05:00 %
  Process PID Runtime (ms) Invoked uSecs 5 Sec 1 Min 5 Min TTY
  152 9304 5144 1808 0.71% 0.22% 0.17% 1 SSH process
  139 46322920 12113823 3823 0.47% 0.40% 0.44% 0 CDP Protocol

  I don't see what process is the cause, but if I remove the WCCP in the interface, it drops to 1% so I know for a fact that WCCP is the cause.

  If I remove the redirect l2 and l2-back on the WAE, WCCP on the registers of 6500 WILL redirect and return on the 6500 and CPU falls to 5%.

  If I activate the option "wccp webcache accelerated" on the 6500, I can't WCCP upward with or without back l2 and l2-redirection on the WAE options, it displays:

  001782: 21:24:00.055 Jan 28: WCCP - EVNT:wccp_update_assignment_status: enter

  001783: 21:24:00.055 Jan 28: WCCP - EVNT:wccp_update_assignment_status: exit

  001784: 21:24:00.055 Jan 28: WCCP - EVNT:S00: Here_I_Am [hidden ip] package fwd w/bad method 00000001, offered 00000002

  001785: 21:24:00.055 Jan 28: WCCP - EVNT:S00: Here_I_Am package [hidden ip] with capabilites incompatible

  Can anyone say about this issue, this 6500 is the ability to redirect/rewrite of material? My WAE is directly connected to the blade of 6500 WS - X 6548-GE-TX on the same vlan I have do a wccp redirect on.

  g3/4 interface

  WAE-7341 description

  switchport access vlan 600

  interface VLAN 600

  property intellectual cache wccp web redirection in

  Any method, ideally you do not place the WAE on the same VLAN entering as the users.

• High CPU and lag/freezing until the DVD tray is open

  A very strange thing that happens shortly after I burn or rip a CD.  After the burn/rip is finished and the tray ejects, I remove the CD and close the drawer.  Soon after, the computer's processor runs high 80 to 100% and everthing lags / freezes.  I pop open the drawer of the DVD and everthing goes back to normal.  I discovered this fix after days of troubleshooting.  Whats could be wrong?  Windows 7 64-bit SP1 / Asus U56E / Windows Media Player / installed at the factory of Matshita DVD / Intel Core i5 to 2.3 GHz/6 GB of RAM / thank you.

  Hello

  Have you made changes on the computer before this problem?

  Try the following and see if it helps.

  Method 1:

  Try to clear the list pane button after burning disc and see if it helps.

  
  Method 2:

  Uninstall and reinstall the drivers from CD/DVD drive and check if it helps.

  Update a hardware driver that is not working properly: http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-US/Windows7/Update-a-Driver-for-Hardware-that-isn ' t-work properly

  Method 3:

  Change user settings for Windows Media files and check.

  Open Media Player > file > library management.
  Select each library (video, music, photos, tv recorded [If you]) and check the paths that it manages, and make sure that it is not too close to the root of the C: drive

  Example: It should be likec:\users\ \Music and c:\users\Public\Music, no c:\users as they will cause the whole directory to re tree - index over and over (when you surf the web, or change files in your profile).

  Reference: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-performance/windows-7-has-high-cpu-usage-and-slow-performance/b5c79a15-781b-455a-9003-6d305695fce0

  It will be useful.

• searchindexer.exe extermemly high CPU usage - days

  Not sure that to do, I rebuilt the index, manually deleted the record of data to index, completely removed, rebooted, and then reinstalled Windows Search from the Add/Remove Windows features, I also chkdsk/f had my records.

  When the Searchindexer.exe uses as much CPU as she can I checked with resource monitor and it is not read to leave or by writing to all files, just chip away cycles CPU.

  Edit: more information

  I created a dump of the searchindexer.exe and its opening with a debugger tool, it is the content

  Microsoft (R) Windows debug 6.2.9200.16384 AMD64 Version
  Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

  Loading dump file [S:\Tools\SearchIndexer.exe.dmp]
  User Mini with full memory dump file: only application data is available

  Symbol search path is: * invalid *.
  ****************************************************************************
  * Loading of the symbol may be unreliable without a symbol search path.           *
  * Use .symfix to get the debugger to choose a symbol path.                   *
  * After adjusting your path to symbols, use .reload to refresh the locations of symbols. *
  ****************************************************************************
  Executable search path is:
  Windows 8 Version 9200 MP (8 procs) free x 64
  Product: WinNt, suite: SingleUserTS
  By: 6.2.9200.16384 (win8_rtm.120725 - 1247)
  Computer name:
  The debugging session: Sun Nov 4 22:01:24.000 2012 (UTC - 07:00)
  System Uptime: 0 days 10:09:39.102
  Running time: 0 days 0:54:31.000
  .........................................................
  Loading unloaded module list
  ..........
  ERROR: The symbol file is not found.  Defaulted to export symbols ntdll.dll.
  ERROR: The symbol file is not found.  By default for exporting symbols for KERNELBASE.dll -.
  ntdll! NtWaitForSingleObject + 0xa:
  000007fc ' ret 5b172c2a c3

  also, I checked the thread problem in hacker process, here is the stack:

  0, ntoskrnl.exe! SeAccessCheck + 0x1ef
  1, ntoskrnl.exe! KeDelayExecutionThread + 0xc32
  2, ntoskrnl.exe! KeWaitForSingleObject + 0x1cf
  3, ntoskrnl.exe! _misaligned_access + 0 x 809
  4, ntoskrnl.exe! SeAccessCheck + 0 x 280
  5, ntoskrnl.exe! SeAccessCheck + 0x4d1
  6, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0x2f48
  7, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0x243e
  8, korwbrkr.dll + 0 x 12173
  9, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0 x 1696
  10, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0x62f9
  11, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0 x 6117
  12, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0x5db9
  13, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0 x 5882
  14, korwbrkr.dll! DllUnregisterServer + 0x6fa0
  15, mssrch.dll! DllGetClassObject + 0x3feba
  16, mssrch.dll + 0 x 19425
  17, kernel32.dll! BaseThreadInitThunk + 0x1a
  18, ntdll.dll. RtlUserThreadStart + 0x21

  I also deleted my Outlook data files and started from scratch with my emails, and makes sure the data folders are not on a concert.

  I installed all the updates that are available for Windows 8 and I also ran sfc/scannow.

  I would be grateful if anyone could offer any help at all, thank you.

  Hi entire,

  disable the service in the Services, restart the computer and then re-enable the service.

  I tried, I completely uninstalled from Windows Add/Remove Features service, rebooted the PC and re - he added, and same deal.

  Anyway I found is what the problem is, it's the korwbrkr.dll, it seems to be related to a Korean dictionary, as if the indexer is you are trying to index something with characters Koreans inside (not aware that I have something like that), and he throws a loop for I renamed the korwbrkr.dll to korwbrkr.bak and it has linked the dictionary file and removed from the search index and I allow the indexer to run all night and it shows that indexing is complete, and I have no more high CPU usage.

  I was dealing with high utilization of the processor of the indexer for weeks, now my system is at peace.

• High CPU alert

  Hello

  I frequently receive alerts to high CPU as shown below.

  Message: CPU usage is 96.029%, crossed threshold (95) or attention (80).

  My conclusions

  But I could see none of the processes are more CPU on the server. Could you please comment as long as why I get alerts for when CPU the CPU % is less than the threshold value?

  $ top

  Top - 20:31:03 up to 190 days, 06:24, 2 users, load average: 32.13, 33.53, 33,88

  Tasks: 2379 total, 31 running, 2348 sleep, stopped 0, 0 zombie

  CPU: 79.8%us, 17.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.1%id, 0.5%wa, 0.0%hi, 2.6%si, 0.0%st

  MEM: 264493560 k total, 242572580 k used, 21920980 k free, 1536356 k buffers

  Swap: 33554428 k total, 0 k used, 33554428 k, 220952600-free updated k cached

  PID USER PR NOR VIRT RES SHR S % CPU % MEM TIME + COMMAND

  36418 oracle 20 0 2862 m 52 m 48 m R 38.1 0.0 0:15.68 oracle

  46285 oracle 20 0 2315 m 325 m 317 m R 24.6 0.1 3219:37 oracle

  Oracle - 11.2.0.4.0

  OS - Linux 6.6

  It comes with 2 node cluster HA cluster

  There are 10 databases running on the server.

  It is env PROD.

  Kind regards

  Bala

  2790985 wrote:

  Hello

  How many processors & nuclei exist in this system?

  8

  on what facts make the above statement?

  Based on the output of the high command of the % CPU column that is used less than 40%.

  $ top

  -23:28:32 up to 190 days, 09:22, 1 user, load average: 30.57, 30.23, 30.78

  Tasks: 2392 total, 34 running, 2358 sleep, stopped 0, 0 zombie

  CPU: 81.7%us, 13.8%sy, 0.0%ni, 1.0%id, 0.9%wa, 0.0%hi, 2.7%si, 0.0%st

  MEM: 264493560 k total, 242582548 k used, 21911012 k free, 1537528 k buffers

  Swap: 33554428 k total, 0 k used, 33554428 k, 220964328-free updated k cached

  PID USER PR NOR VIRT RES SHR S % CPU % MEM TIME + COMMAND

  46387 oracle 20 0 2307 m 312 m 303 m R 24.2 0.1 3231:45 oracle

  46295 oracle 20 0 2307 m 324 m 314 m R 23.9 0.1 3238:51 oracle

  I see the system with only 0.1% of CPU INACTIVE

  Is harmful anyway be slowed to 0.1%? Could you please comment on this?

  Kind regards

  Bala

  > Based on the output of the high command of the % CPU column that is used less than 40%.

  The % CPU column, it is ONLY for that deal with the unique OS; This means that single session consumes 40% of single CPU!

  > CPU: 81.7%us, 13.8%sy,.

  above shows USER & SYSTEM processing consumes more than 95% of all cycles CPU.

  > load average: 30.57, 30.23, 30.78

  See the depth of the queue of the processor during the minutes last 1, 5, & 15

  In short this system is linked to the CPU. It was more work than the resources available.

  Either the workload, increase or decrease the power of the processor to avoid warnings in the future!

• TimesTen 11 g - direct connection jdbc get very high CPU usage

  Hi guys,.
  
  When I run my application with a direct connection, I get very high CPU usage... Can help me where can I fix this.
  This is the configuration I have.
  
  PermSize = 102400
  TempSize = 2457
  
  More, should one I include the LogBufferSize? How much should I put in it?
  
  
  Thank you
  
  John

  Well, the point to keep in mind is that overall CPU utilization will not higher with direct mode with a local server. In fact, it will be a little weaker because of the much higher efficientcy of direct mode compared to client/server mode.

  The usual rules apply here; You must decide on the maximum use of your machine (normally one trying to limit it to)<=60% for="" the="" most="" optimal="">

  Then you need to see how your workload uses the CPU. with TimesTen there is no blocking operation within the database for a single application thread can, if it does not crash on all external events such as queue of messages, etc. I/O, usually consume a whole CPU core (a large volume of work in the process of transformation). If he asks you to this nature then you want to limit the number of concurrent threads to the smallest reasonable number. Assuming that the machine is running just the application and TimesTen and nothing else and that you wish to leave a carrot free for activity of DB o/s and the background (for example, journal of hot flashes and checkponting) then optimal throughput and response time will be reached with three concurrent threads hitting the database. You can run course with wires more than that but the flow will not be increased (in fact it will decrease somehwat due claim etc.) and response times will certainly increase. For this application profile you certainly wouldn't want to use more than 8 simultaneous maximum son.

  At the other extreme is an application that has multiple concurrent threads, but where each thread spends much of its time waiting for some work to do and runs only makes for a short period of work process then returns to the wait. You can use several more concurrent threads than the hearts of processors for this application profiel. The optimal number will be determined by the specific workload, load CPU it generates and your maximum target of use of the system.

  None of this is really specific TimesTen. The main differences that TimesTen brings all this are:

  1. the workload of database now works on the same machine as the application rather than on a server separate from the DB so that it consumes resources on the application computer.

  2. in general, database interactions will result not in any idle time from a point of view CPU usage (as a consequence of (1) above).

  Ideally, your request will be designed and implemented so that the number of concurrent threads can be controlled as a parameter tunbable to allow you to adjust the workload generated by the application to the specific environment in which it runs.

  Chris

• High CPU consumption (always between 12 and 30%)

  I am running Firefox 9.0.1 for Mac. Until the upgrade to version 9.0.1 I had no use of high CPU problems... I've now must constantly between 12% and 30% of CPU and up to sometimes use much further than that, which really slows down my Mac to a point where I have to kill Firefox to use other applications.

  I have a new Mac mini with fast CPU and 8 GB of RAM.

  I tried to reinstall and also to disable the 4 Add-ons I have installed. After a new installation and all 4 disabled add-ons, I see exactly the same problem even with one tab open to google.com

  Any help from the community is very much appreciated.

  Thanks in advance...

  I've upgraded to Firefox 10 and this issue is now resolved.

• High CPU after 10.11.3 at 10.11.4 upgrade

  Use El Capitan successfully for several months, 10.11.1 to 10.11.3 migration. However, the upgrade to 10.11.4 led to relatively stable high CPU.

  In particular, I see process launchd (about 75%), UserEventAgent (70%) and mds_stores (30%) CPU consumption at that rate there essentially all the time, the % overall slowed down when do nothig is about 45% - therefore on an end of 2014 retina iMac 27 inches with Fusion drive. Despite this, everything works still with reasonable performance, probably because there is still spare CPU capacity.

  Looking at the Console log, I see a lot of

  29/03/2016 18:17:01.002 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

  29/03/2016 18:18:02.001 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

  29/03/2016 18:19:03.002 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

  29/03/2016 18:20:04.002 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

  It's be connected at intervals of a minute or so, although I don't see any referenced messages.

  Removed some of the programs began and eliminated some of the agents launched (I think) and also re-installed from the recovery partition, but the problem is still there.

  Someone at - it watched questions along these lines?

  Would appreciate any suggestions.

  Try each of them in order. A test to see if the computer works properly:

  1. Reset the PRAM
  2. Reset the controller (SMC) system management
  3. Start the computer in Safe Mode, and then restart normally. It's slower than a standard home.
  4. Repair the disk by booting to the recovery HD immediately after the chime press keys control and R that the Utility Menu appears. Choose disk utility and click on the button continue. Select the withdrawal (usually Macintosh HD) volume entry of the list to one side.  Click first aid button in the toolbar. Hold the button brings up. Disk utility and return in the Utility Menu. Restart the computer from the Apple Menu.
  5. Reinstall OS X by booting from the Recovery HD using the command and R keys. When the Utility Menu appears, select reinstall OS X and then click continue.
  6. Download and install updated Combo OS X El Capitan 10.11.4.