IP VPN bandwidth

Hi all

I want to know if there is a flow control method in IP VPN connection between routers? I want to know the flow set up by my ISP.

Thanks to you all.

Hello, wlidit01.

It is more than a network traffic monitoring tool. However, you can check at NetFlow Cisco routers supported. What routers you use between your office?

http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/iOS-NX-OS-software/iOS-...

I would like to know if you have any additional concerns as well. Kind regards.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Cisco VPN bandwidth

    Hi all

    is someone who can help me in the next question?

    We have a VPN S2S with 50Mb internet connection with Cisco no firewalls (unfortunately).
    they see the VPN tunnel doesnot use bandwidth everything.

    my plan is to implement this VPN with Cisco ISR 800Series models (cause we need them also in the future have a FlexVPN)

    based on the quallity of Cisco systems, are we going to have a better performance for the VPN?
    is it possible to manage and configure points of vpn for a better communication bettwen offices?

    Thank you in advance,
    Thomas

    I can 100% assure you series Cisco 890 flat line a circuit of 50 MB/s with crypto using media to the mix of big package and have a free unused unused production capacity.

    If you only use small packages (such as VoIP), then you're going to need a 4000 series router.

  • Show Interface Tunnel explaination

    Hello

    Can anyone explain me what this means:

    Show interface Tunnel

    Tunnel of transmission bandwidth 8000 (Kbps)
    Tunnel to receive 8000 (Kbps) bandwidth

    Is VPN bandwidth? If Yes, we change it?

    Thank you

    If yes, can we change it?

    Yes, you can if you run the Advanced IP Services feature (and above).

  • How to limit the bandwidth in the VPN Tunnels in RV082?

    Hello

    It is possible to limit the bandwidth of the IPSEC VPN Tunnels or the traffic that goes through the tunnels?

    Use IP addresses or port numbers the same way and clients when limiting bandwidth to clients in the local network?

    Thank you very much

    Oliver

    There is a way to solve internal IP addresses, protocols or ports and specify the bandwidth

    I send you the links to access information on how to set it up.

    http://www6.nohold.NET/Cisco2/GetArticle.aspx?docid=3c09b393e3744ffd98330fd0031a4aa2_4228.XML&PID=80&converted=0

  • Limit the bandwidth in the tunnel VPN on Cisco ASA

    Hello

    I have a site VPN tunnel to create with the local desktop client. I fear that the traffic in the tunnel in impacting the Internet bandwidth for the entire office. Is it possible to limit bandwidth on the speed VPN tunnel. I have attached a configuration that shows the configuration of the ASA at the local office.

    Any help would be much appreciate. I watched QoS mapping but it's hard to make sense.

    Thank you very much

    Kind regards

    Michael.

    The ASA supported QoS features are:
    Police, LLQ and Traffic Shaping

    To avoid the individual flows hogging the bandwidth of the network, you can limit the maximum bandwidth used by flow (with the police)
    The police is a way of ensuring that no traffic exceeds the rate (in bits per second) that you configure,
    so make that person not traffic or the class can return to any of the resource.
    When traffic is higher than the maximum rate, the ASA removes the excess traffic. Policy defines also the largest single burst of allowed traffic.

    Example of font options:
    class policing_map_name hostname(config-pmap) #.
    Police hostname(config-pmap-c) # {exit | entry} to compliance rates [conform burst]
    [action in line [drop | send]] [action exceed [drop | send]]

    That is to say

    HostName (config) # class - police-class card
    HostName(config-CMAP) # match any
    HostName(config-CMAP) # QoS_policy policy-map
    class police_class hostname(config-pmap) #.
    HostName(config-pmap-c) # exit police 56000 10500

    The configuration depends on the "this" base that you want to limit the connection.

    Federico.

  • VPN Client 4.8 use/needs in bandwidth

    Apologies this has answered before somewhere...

    No one knows the approximate bandwidth of 4.8 customer needs? Basically I have an internet connection of 7 MB to the dedicated address and I need to know how many concurrent VPN IPSEC users I can accommodate before having to pass the pipe.

    Kind regards

    Stuart

    Hi Stuart,

    Happy to help you.

    For the configuration and planning, you can check a useful link:

    http://Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6659/products_ios_protocol_option_home.html

    Please rate if this helped.

    Kind regards

    Daniel

  • Order to check the ability or the bandwidth between the VPN Site-to-Site Tunnel

    Hello

    How can we verify capacity/bandwidth between the end of the B-end of the site-to-site VPN tunnel.

    You can't very easily. The capacity and bandwidth dependent not only on your devices, but on a lot of devices and paths between them that you have no control or visibility.

    You can "show traffic" or common report on the use of interface using any performance management tool (cactus, which is gold, SolarWinds NPM, Cisco first LMS, etc..). Those usually do not distinguish between overall traffic interface and that due to virtual private networks. If you export the ASA Netflow data, you can break it down by remote IP address and which derive the use VPN. NetFlow records must be exported in tool like ntop, SolarWinds NTA or first LMS or Infrastructure to be useful.

    Cisco Security Manager will query the VPN statistics periodically and you Beach individual VPN or users to gather a bunch of queries, as it does on an ongoing basis.

  • Limit bandwidth for VPN users

    Hi guys,.

    I use ASA Version 8.2 (1), I want to limit vpn users to use less bandwidth of my Interlink to access something on the inside of the network

    example: source vpn pool

    Destn: inside the network

    Please let me know how to achieve this with QOS config.

    Hello

    Probably the best would be to match groups of tunnel.

    class-map TG1-best-effort 
    match tunnel-group Tunnel-Group-1 
    match flow ip destination-address 

    Then this traffic in police policy-map and apply the service policy to the external interface (since you want to traffic police from your home). You can also use the pool for vpn access lists.

    For more details, please see:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/QoS.html

  • How to configure bandwidth allowed on the VPN IPSec ASA tunnels?

    ASA 5505 8.2.1

    ASA 5520 8.4

    We currently have a tunnel set up between 2 ASAs

    is 1 - possible to assign 1.5 Mbps of Bandwidth (BW) to this tunnel? Then if Tunnel number 2 is set up I could assign 2 Mbit to this one for example?

    I'm not talking to prioritize certain type of traffic on the IPsec tunnel, I'm talking about Tunnel 1 to 1.5 Mbps of BW guaranteed for all traffic that passes through it. Same for tunnel 2

    Then

    2-How do to control the quantity of biological weapons in an IPsec tunnel?

    Please provide documentation possible

    Thank you

    Johnny

    Hello! Please consult this document:

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-1230

    ___

    HTH. Please rate this post if this has been helpful. If it solves your problem, please mark this message as "right answer".

  • iPhone 6s won't connect to VPN on work wifi but goes on other wifi networks

    Hello

    I have been connected to my wifi to work for a while and had to use a VPN to use things such as whats'app and access to sites like Facebook. It worked well until what recently just VPN logs not when I am connected to this wifi network. I know that the password etc and I get the symbol wifi at the top of my phone but never impossible to access Web sites (which was normal, but the VPN it fixed), but now I can not connect the VPN even more.

    The VPN application I use is Betternet but I've also tried a few others, none works. However, they all work when I connect to my own wifi network.

    iPhone 6 s - last version of iOS from today (28 Apr 16) cannot find the exact version on my phone

    Pleaseeeeee help me connect to my VPN when I'm on my work wifi

    VPN can be difficult, maybe to consult Betternet. Also see this article for suggestions.

    iOS: setting up VPN - Apple Support

    FWIW here are some general recommendations for Wi - Fi problems, maybe one of them will help you.

    (1) perform a forced reboot: hold the Home and Sleep/Wake buttons simultaneously for about 15-20 seconds, until the Apple logo appears. Leave the device to reboot.

    (2) resetting the network settings: settings > general > reset > reset network settings. Join the network again.

    (3) reboot router/Modem: unplug power for 2 minutes and reconnect. Update the Firmware on the router (support Web site of the manufacturer for a new FW check). Also try different bands (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz) and different bandwidths (recommended for 2.4 to 20 MHz bandwidth).

    (4) change of Google DNS: settings > Wi - Fi > click the network, delete all the numbers under DNS and enter 8.8.8.8 or otherwise 8.8.4.4

    (5) disable the prioritization of device on the router if this feature is available.

    (6) determine if other wireless network devices work well (other iOS devices, Mac, PC).

    (7) try the device on another network, i.e., neighbors, the public coffee house, etc.

    (8) to restore the device (ask for more details if you wish).

    https://support.Apple.com/en-us/HT201252

    (9) go to the Apple Store for the evaluation of the material.

  • Limit the use of bandwidth per device?

    My father-in-law uses a program that didn't live follow tickers in different stock markets in the world. It takes up bandwidth on our network and does not care if he does or not. It's a real pain, because he will not change his program or get his own connection.

    Is there a method to limit the speed/bandwidth of each system?

    Why not put a QoS rule in place, for this particular device (using IP address or MAC address) and give priority to "low"?

    Allowing him the course "low activity" of others to get optimum bandwidth, and when others are on the same router / network, it will give priority to traffic, via its connection.

    It seems to work at home, where users of League of Legends and Skype (I know who they are :-)) have a low priority, and my work VPN connections have a higher priority)

  • Bandwidth Assistance remotely

    What is the bandwidth required to run Remote Assistance on Windows XP Professional with sp2? Is it possible to run more than 3 G, GPRS or GSM? I need to establish a connection for example Secure vpn-channel, then share control of remote desktop.

    Yes, a lot of benefits. You don't need to open ports on a firewall, you don't need to deal with the sending of an email invitation (which doesn't always work and can be difficult for the person who needs help), you don't need to change the settings on the remote computer, you don't need to confront everything that has been set on a router , and you do not need to deal with security corporate edge. The remote user is generally very limited in his computer skills and everything they need to do is double-click the TeamViewer icon. Which means not to denigrate the people dear I have help, but even if this is difficult for some of them. TeamViewer is free for personal use. If you need a business solution, there are paid versions. Another good company that offers this type of service is GoToMyPC. MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

  • WRT1200AC/1900AC WIRED Intermittent connectivity software company (Cisco) VPN - resolved

    I work from a Home Office 24 x 7 as a software engineer supporting the business intelligence world production for a credit/bank card issuer applications - so my 'stuff' has to work.  My components materials network and the machines are "top-shelf."  I recently added a WRT1900AC router and have started to feel the intermittent connectivity WIRED to VPN my company (Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client).  To be clear, this has nothing to do with the setting of the OpenVPN server is available via the user interface of the Linksys Smart Wi - Fi.  In any case, after many hours of research and changes the configuration on the router (with a significant amount of curse and aggravation), I solved the problem by using the areas of prioritization of media and bandwidth downstream from the HMI.  Question a also experienced, but to a lesser extent, during the wireless connection.  It was confusing, since generally the when router problems occur, they seem to be more related to the Wi - Fi connection rather than wired.  Anyway, I wanted to share this info with other poor souls that might have been ostrasized of their family, friends and colleagues as a result of this almost apocalyptic puzzle.

    You are welcome. Happy holidays! Certainly happy to clarify as needed.

  • VPN between Cisco and Check Point problem

    Guys,

    I have problems to establish a vpn site-to-site between a Cisco 3660 e router tunnel a firewall checkpoint NG AI R55.

    In the SiteA is an environment with a Cisco 3660 router using the following configurations:

    crypto ISAKMP policy 1

    md5 hash

    preshared authentication

    Group 2

    life 86400

    !

    ISAKMP crypto key [removed] address 172.17.10.111

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac serasa

    !

    Serasa 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    defined by peer 172.17.10.111

    Set transform-set serasa

    match address 101

    !

    interface Serial5/4

    bandwidth 64

    IP 192.168.163.6 255.255.255.252

    no ip unreachable

    No cdp enable

    card crypto serasa

    !

    IP route 10.12.0.155 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

    IP route 172.17.10.111 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

    IP route 172.17.10.155 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

    !

    access-list 101 permit tcp 172.248.7.200 host 10.12.0.0 0.0.255.255 eq 3315

    In the SiteB, we have an environment highly available Nokia using VRRP.

    The IP address configured as a cluster in the Control Point is 172.17.10.111.

    We have already confirmed all the configurations of the phase 1 and 2 and is OK, but the VPN is not established.

    The following messages appear in the router and the firewall:

    ROUTER

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): check IPSec 1 proposal

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: turn 1 ESP_DES

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: attributes of transformation:

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: program is 1

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: life of HIS (basic) 3600

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: type of life in kilobytes

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: service life of SA (IPV) 0x0 0 x 46 0 50 x 0 x 0

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: authenticator is HMAC-MD5

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): atts are acceptable.

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (validate_proposal_request): part #1 of the proposal

    (Eng. msg key.) Local INCOMING = 192.168.163.6, distance = 172.17.10.111,.

    local_proxy = 172.248.7.200/255.255.255.255/0/0 (type = 1),

    remote_proxy = 10.12.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0 (type = 4),

    Protocol = ESP, transform = esp - esp-md5-hmac.

    lifedur = 0 and 0kb in

    SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0 x 2

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (kei_proxy): head = serasa, card-> ivrf =, kei-> ivrf =

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (validate_transform_proposal): proxy unsupported identities

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): IPSec policy invalidated proposal

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): politics of ITS phase 2 is not acceptable! (local 192.168.163.6 remote 172.17.10.111)

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: node set 2114856837 to QM_IDLE

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): lot of 200.245.207.111 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): purge the node 2114856837

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): unknown entry for node-528822595: State = IKE_QM_I_QM1, large = 0x00000001, minor = 0x0000000C

    June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: % CRYPTO-6-IKMP_MODE_FAILURE: fast processing mode failed with the peer to 172.17.10.111

    FIREWALL

    IKE: Main Mode has received Notification of peers: first Contact

    IKE: Completion of Main Mode.

    IKE: Quick Mode has received Notification of the counterpart: no proposal chosen

    IKE: Quick Mode has received Notification of the counterpart: no proposal chosen

    IKE: Exchanging information received remove peer IKE - SA:

    Anyone have idea who might be the problem?

    Thank you very much for the help.

    Fabiano Mendonca.

    Cool. pls mark as resolved if that might help others... the rate of responses if deemed useful...

    REDA

  • Use of bandwidth IPSEC 3Des

    I have 2mbps link we want to enable ipsec 3des on the same if say my 50% of the binding is used at the point and if activate ipsec 3des what bandwidth utilzed after having activated the ipsec.

    3662 w/AIM-VPN/HPII - 2mbps link - 3662 w/AIM-VPN/HPII

    The answer depends on whether you use 3des to encrypt new traffic currently does not flow on your existing binding, such as the establishment of a new remote site location. If the encrypted traffic is new, it's something extra which does not affect the flow of the current, then you will need to analyze the structure of traffic.

    I think that IPsec will add about 50 to 80 bytes for each package, depending on whether it is ah will be used as well as the esp, if WILL be used, and if tunnel mode (new ip headers) must be used too. (Add 24 bytes for AH, 24 bytes for the GRE and 20 bytes for new IP header).

    If the IPSec vpn will be used only for existing traffic, instead of new flows, the util link should not increase that much. It is time CPU more bandwidth, and I see that you unloading encrypt cards.

    Let me know if you need anything that anyone else.

Maybe you are looking for