Is it possible to route signals of relaxation between two chassis PXI-1002 with the PXI-8335?

Hello

as the subject says, I am interested in the delivery of a signal to trigger between two chassis PXI-1002. At present, these two chassis are connected by a MXI - 3 system using maps PXI-8335. The software is Labview 2010 sp1 and 380 NIScope drivers.

We want to keep (a PXI-5122 by chassis) scanners supply separated due to the requirements of our measure! The chassis are connected via cable to fiber optic. This explains why I can not just use the shutter release in Star, or connect via 'Trigger' or 'clk' cards (the inputs / outputs to the front of the cards).

I found a few examples, but they seem to all be designed for use with a chassis only, I'll call later to the examples that inspired me to this point. Each guide explaining the synchronization of several chassis systems seems to use another material or VI is not accesible to me. This makes me wonder if my hardware has the capacibilities I need.

The first picture shows approximately where I started from (sorry I can't post VI, confidential...):

Only the middle part is interesting. Two sessions are initialized and manipulated parallel, trigger too. This has led to delays in the signals and should now be fixed. This apart from the VI works fine.

Goal is to trigger only on one channel but both devices! If possible, the device will trigger must be chooseable.

I started to rebuild the VI using the "EX Synchronization.vi 5xxx niScope' seeming spontaneity. The result is shown in the following image:

I tried different RTSI lines, but had no positive results. only the main channel has triggered.

After this first approach, I looked in the "niScope EX .vi multi-Device configured Acquisition (TClk)" and other examples of TClk which seem to work for similar problems. The VI of reconstruction can be seen in the following images:

(Sorry, I had to use two photos..)

In this case, I didn't have no choice for trigger lines, it would automatically set the VI TClk. I tried to trigger on both devices, though. This second approach seemed promising to me, but it was an error:

"niTClk Synchronize.vi:1".

Index (starting at zero) of the session: 1

The error reported by the pilot of the instrument:

No registered trigger could be found between the
devices on the route.

If you have a PXI chassis, the chassis correctly identify in
MAX and make sure that it has been configured correctly. If you use PCI
devices, make sure they are connected with a RTSI cable and that the cable RTSI
is saved to the MAX. Otherwise, make sure that there is an available trigger line
the trigger bus shared between devices.

Source device: PXI1Slot4

Target unit: PXI2Slot4

Status code:-89125niTClk Synchronize.vi:1

Index (starting at zero) of the session: 1

The error reported by the pilot of the instrument:

No registered trigger could be found between the
devices on the route.

Source device: PXI1Slot4

Target unit: PXI2Slot4

"Status code:-89125"

This error came back even after I've identified this drug as possible to the MAX, as shown in the screenshot:

In some of the textbooks, they showed how to get the MAX trigger lines, but as you can see, there is only booking options in my MAX. Whatever I do, I can't find options to define how to get my trigger signals...

In principle, it is possible to trigger instruments in different chassis, which is indicated in this Guide and others... the question that remains is can it be done with my set of components?

I understand that the use of multichassis compromised the integrity of the lines very adjusted as trigger in Star etc., so the configuration should be taken into account in some way, that my approach does not, I knew... But there must be a way to do this? And to start: to get just any signal from one device to the other trigger!

For any advice on this issue, I would be very thanfull!

Concerning

Max1744

Hi Max,.

Thanks for the detailed post and explanations of your application and requirements. You're right using TClk, because this is the optimal method to synchronize the 5122 digitizers. The original VI you worked with is unique for some of the legacy scanners and does not directly work with scanners based on the most recent CMS (for example the 5122). The good news is that you can synchronize these cards to separate chassis, but it will use the calendar 66xx and synchronization (T & S) cards in the chassis of the master and the slave, as indicated in the guide that you have accessed. These are needed because a common reference clock must be shared between them as well as a couple of tripping. MXI itself can not handle export triggers and clocks, so there is no way to do this without physically wiring between the chassis with cards T & S. Unfortunately, regardless of what specific method, you use for synchronization, it will take a material extra beyond what you currently have.

As one of your needs looks like it is necessary to retain wiring between the chassis directly, you may need to consider to synchronize using 1588 or GPS protocols. 1588 Protocol is a system for synchronization on the network while GPS course use antennas and locks for a common wireless signal. Although these synchronization methods may allow you to keep your chassis isolated, they will also require some manual configuration because you would be able to use the TClk synchronization and so the level of synchronization you can get between the cards may not be as good that can physically wire signals between the chassis using T & S cards.

Hope this helps,

Tags: NI Products

Similar Questions

is it possible to install CC on one of my other mac/PC with the same subscription?

is it possible to install CC on one of my other mac/PC with the same subscription?

Hello

Thank you Lara, who was the answer that I wanted.

Respect of

Gustav

Is it possible to add a fade degraded to a rectangle, I did with the title editor?

I did a rectangle as the background with the title editor.
I want to make the sides fade out to nothing, a bit like a glow in Psalm...
Is it possible to do?
I tried to use a stroke and a gradient, but I have not seen a way to select no color.
Any ideas?

Thinking more about it. You could do a title with just your rectangle. Place it on, say video Track 2, and then apply a linear Wipe to it. Put the other "parts" of your title on a separate title on video track 3. Might get you close.

Good luck

Hunt

Routing between two remote sites connected over the VPN site to site

I have a problem ping between remote sites. Now the Cryptography and no nat ACL's for different sites just to affect traffic between the remote site and main site. I tried to add roads, adding other subnets to the crypto and no. ACL Nat at the remote sites... nothing worked. Any ideas?

Main site:

192.168.100.0 - call manager / phone VLAN

192.168.1.0/24 - data VLAN

Site 1:

192.168.70.0/24 - phone VLAN

192.168.4.0/24 - data VLAN

Site 2:

192.168.80.0/24 - phone VLAN

192.168.3.0/24 - data VLAN

Main router

Expand the IP ACL5 access list
10 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255
20 ip 192.168.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255
30 permits ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255
IP 192.168.100.0 allow 40 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255)
50 permit ip 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255
Expand the IP ACL6 access list
10 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255
20 ip 192.168.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
30 permits ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
IP 192.168.100.0 allow 40 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

Expand the No. - NAT IP access list
10 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255
20 deny ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255
30 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255
40 deny ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
320 ip 192.168.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any
IP 192.168.100.0 allow 330 0.0.0.255 any

Site 1:

ACL5 extended IP access list

IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255

No. - NAT extended IP access list

deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255

refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255

IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 any

Site 2:

ACL6 extended IP access list
IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255
No. - NAT extended IP access list
deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 10.255.255.0 0.0.0.255
IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any
ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 any

What should I do for these two sites can ping each other? I looked through the forums but can't seem to find someone with a similar problem, which has received a definitive answer.

Thanks in advance!

Hi, I assume that you need site 1 and 2 to communicate with each other via the main site right? If this is the case, then you need to set add the following lines to your ACL crypto:

Main router

Expand the IP ACL5 access list

IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

Expand the IP ACL6 access list

IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

Make sure you add these lines before the last permit

Expand the No. - NAT IP access list

deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

Site 1:

ACL5 extended IP access list

IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

IP 192.168.70.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

ip licensing 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

Make sure that these lines are added before the last permit

No. - NAT extended IP access list

deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

refuse the 192.168.4.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

Site 2:

ACL6 extended IP access list

IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

IP 192.168.80.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

ip licensing 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

So make sure that these lines are added before the last permit

No. - NAT extended IP access list

deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.70.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.80.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

So you're saying good enough your routers with these definitions which will be reached via one main remote sites (sites 1 and 2).

I would like to know if this is what you need.

How to make a route between two routers (networks) connected to the same switch?

Hello guys, how are you?

In my company, we have 2 internet routers more dsl router of data connected to 1 switch line

the data row is used to connect the branches of our company together for network problems.

the router 192.168.2.1 IP data

internet routers IP 192.168.1.1 - 57.194.97.1

We have 3 accesspoints wireless taking their internet of 192.168.1.1 oky guy

what I want to do is when I connect to any wireless network to connect to the data line dsl with router 192.168.2.1

When I use the ethernet on my pc I have IP addresses 192.168.2.222 for router data line and 192.168.1.222 for internet

but the wireless is DHCP n that it is connected only to 192.168.1.1, which is the internet router, how can I do 192.168.1.1 192.168.2.1 when I connect

using the wireless?

I hope that you understand me ^_^

Thanks in advance.

Hello

The question you posted would be better suited to the TechNet community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.

http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/w7itpro/

Hope this information is useful.

is it possible to establish a direct connection between two computers, one running on windows xp sp2 and other running on windows xp sp3?

Hello
I connected two computers, one running on windows xp sp2 and others running on windows xp sp3 via com using RS232 port via link Modem DFM-562E ++.
I am able to dial numbers from a PC successfully.
But when I do a direct link between them (one as a host, the other guest) through the com port, I get error 777.
Is this because the two PC's using different service packs?
Help, please.
Thank you & best regards
Ravi

It is not the service pack - although you should have installed sp3 now.

Your message is not clear: have you been able to connect successfully computers using your modem D-Link? How did you do that? Will there be a modem in the second computer?

What cable are you using to establish a direct connection between the com ports on both computers? If you have purchased this cable online, please provide a link to the site where you bought it.

Please describe the physical connection between the two computers. For example, this is how you connect to the Internet by dial-up services:

computer 1-{(9 broches) RS-232 serial port}-{RS-232 cable supplied with the modem}-{modem}-{phone cord (RJ-11 modular plugs at each end)}-{telephone wall jack}

Is it possible to run DiagOnCAN with the NI-CAN driver only (without car Diag command Set)

Hello world

Is it possible to run DiagOnCan without using Diag command set auto - only with the NI-CAN driver (hardware I use is low tolerant speed - USB8472 and NOR-XNET)?

G. Petko

no problem to do with your hardware and NI-CAN frame API.

However, you must implement the Diag and Services Transport layer on your own, which is quite a big job.

I recommend you spend the money for automotive diagnostic command set that supports
- NI CAN (PXI, PCI, PCMCIA, USB)
- NOR-XNET
- cRIO/985 x target (Pharlap and VxWorks) #.
which means that if you plan to transfer your application in the future to different hardware target or the real-time target, that you don't need to change your app at all.

Is it possible to have a picture light up with the mouse on?

Hello I would like to know how to link to turn on when the user moves the mouse over the link? I have a Web site designed by someone and would like to know if the same thing can happen if the link is in fact an image? Is it possible to illuminate the image if the image background is transparent? See the following Web site http://www.x-filt.com at the top of the home page menu items on and contact us they light up but the XFL is an image with a transparent background, but does not illuminate. Do you need to do two images one without mouse and another which changes color or lights up when the mouse is over the image? I am a newbie to photo editing and javascript.
Thank you

You answered your question here. Mouse over effects are accomplished by switching between two images so fast that the brain is deceived into thinking that the image itself changes. Photoshop allows you to make images for mouse overs, but you must always provide code, generally JavaScript, and also a container generally a web browser to make the illusion.

Route signals to output multiple CS6

Hello! Is is possible to route the output signal to multiple output on my interface at the same time? And if so, how to set up that?
Best regards, Charles

The only way I think you can do is put in place several fade after sending each channel, one for each output you want to use. You need a bus to each separate output that you want, and then you have to allocate to each shipment of each channel to a bus each - if you see what I mean.

What you have actually done at this stage is to make the master output redundant, and each bus, with the channels that you want to use sent to her, becomes a new master. Each bus can be allocated specifically to the release of material. Well, it's a little difficult to set up, but it should work.

R7000 as router with the router for mobile broadband Internet

Hey guys. First of all, my apologies for my somewhat inadequate English skills. Secondly, I am brand new to the community, so apologies in advance for any fault :-) Third stop, apologize for having a complete beginner :-D

So, for the issue: I recently bought a router top mobile broadband 4G (4 G MBR) to my apartment, because of the gap of strength and speed signal very low quality of the cable to the ground on my Street (fiber is to come next year).

But the router provided by my operator isn't on par with my router R7000 Nighthawk when he comes to reach wifi, wifi speed, number of outputs of LAN and power of the processor.

So, I want to use my R7000 my router, the internet signal from the air to the 4G MBR, then by cable to the WAN of the R7000.
In other words; I want to just 4G MBR to simply pass / transfer the internet signal to my nighthawk R7000 router so I can use the R7000 as my router, LAN and wifi.

How can I set this up?

Thanks for your help!

Update: the MBR has been no help at all. As far as I could tell, there is no possibility to bridge or pass-through mode. The R7000, as she does the work. I just put it in AP mode, adjust all the wired connections DHCP/auto IP assign and everything works great.

I need help with the wireless system. One of my computers doesn't seem to get signal

Hello, I installed Belkin F5D8235-4 router and im get the signal on one of my computers. On the other computer, it seems that im getting the signal, but it says unidentified network. When I try to open the internet it says is Interenet Explorer cannot display Web page. Do you think this could have to do with the card in my computer is not not compatible. I have an Atheros AR5007 802. 11 b / g WiFi adapt. IM thinking that if I buy a D-Link wireless G USB adapter, USB wireless adapter Compact of Linksys or a Belkin 54 G Wireless USB Adapter my computer may be able to get the signal. What can I do? Help please

Hello

Your router could be suspicious here, you have successfully updated its firmware as a possible solution? And I would like to
Update your WiFi drivers on computers. How you are positioned in the router? Are there
obstacles in the path? With the help of WPA/WPA2 security? You put on the G and N or N
only? A to G for this adapter connect the send.

Your Atheros should be consistent - could be drivers.

Actually try updating your driver and disabling the network logon. (To do this, use a wired connection or)
Download drivers on another machine and transfer on removable media).

Control Panel - network - write down of the brand and the model of the Wifi - double click top - tab of the driver - write
version - click the driver update (cannot do something that MS is far behind the pilots of certification). Then
Right click on the Wifi device and UNINSTALL - Reboot - it will refresh the driver stack.

Look at the sites of the manufacturer for drivers - and the manufacturer of the device manually.
http://pcsupport.about.com/od/driverssupport/HT/driverdlmfgr.htm

How to install a device driver in Vista Device Manager
http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/193584-Device-Manager-install-driver.html

Download - SAVE - go where you put it - right click – RUN AS ADMIN.

You can download several at once however restart after the installation of each of them.

After watching the system manufacturer, you can check the manufacturer of the device an even newer version. (The
manufacturer of system become your backup policies).

Repeat for network (NIC) card and is a good time to get the other updated drivers as Vista like
updated drivers.

I would also turn off auto update for the drivers. If the updates Windows suggests a just HIDE as they
are almost always old, and you can search drivers manually as needed.

How to disable automatic driver Installation in Windows Vista - drivers
http://www.AddictiveTips.com/Windows-Tips/how-to-disable-automatic-driver-installation-in-Windows-Vista/
http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc730606 (WS.10) .aspx

------------------------------------------------------

Make sure you know the details of connection to your router wireless and wired - SSID and password.

You lose connection when you do and have to redo your logon.

Control Panel - Network & Sharing Center - right, click Customize - page set of network locations.
lower left click on merge or delete network locations - REMOVE all instances of your network (and the
others you don't use anymore) - REBOOT. Start - Connect To log on to the network.

-----------------------------------------------------

Check this box:

Strange problem with Internet under Vista
http://www.catonett.com/blog/archives/194

Windows Vista cannot obtain an IP address from certain routers or some non-Microsoft DHCP servers
http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/928233/en-us

----------------------------------------------------

And:

Network connection problems
http://windowshelp.Microsoft.com/Windows/en-us/help/33307acf-0698-41ba-B014-ea0a2eb8d0a81033.mspx

I hope this helps.

Rob - bicycle - Mark Twain said it is good.

After updating my iPhone 6 (9.3.4) the WiFi signal becomes very low! I did everything, but the problem does not stop! I don't a not update my other devices & their very good WiFi signals. Please help me solve this terrible problem...

After updating my iPhone 6 (9.3.4) the WiFi signal becomes very low! I did everything, but the problem does not stop! I don't a not update my other devices & their very good WiFi signals. Please help me solve this terrible problem...

Here's a tip for the user on the problems of Wi - Fi. Suggest from the top and bottom. Maybe one of them will help you.

(1) restart you device.

(2) resetting the network settings: settings > general > reset > reset network settings. Join the network again.

(3) reboot router/Modem: unplug power for 2 minutes and reconnect. Update the Firmware on the router (support Web site of the manufacturer for a new FW check). Also try different bands (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz) and different bandwidths (recommended for 2.4 to 20 MHz bandwidth). Channels 1, 6 or 11 are recommended for 2.4 band.

(4) change of Google DNS: settings > Wi - Fi > click the network, delete all the numbers under DNS and enter 8.8.8.8 or otherwise 8.8.4.4

(5) disable the prioritization of device on the router if this feature is available. Also turn off all apps to VPN and retest the Wi - Fi.

(6) determine if other wireless network devices work well (other iOS devices, Mac, PC).

(7) try the device on another network, i.e., neighbors, the public coffee house, etc.

(8) backup and restore the device using iTunes. Try to restore as New first and test it. If ok try to restore the backup (the backup may be corrupted).

https://support.Apple.com/en-us/HT201252

(9) go to the Apple store for the evaluation of the material. The Wi - Fi chip or the antenna could be faulty.

Council: https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-9892

Suddenly our router keeps losing the internet. The representative of the Cox says that IPV6 on the router is not compatible with the Cisco modem. I'm turning it off? Who is? All started 3 days ago. Have to reboot AirPort Extreme

Suddenly Tuesday, our wifi stopped working. Cox can not see anything on their end. So far, we had to restart 5 times. I finally realized that it is not the modem (Cisco), but our AirPort Extreme. That's all that needs to be restarted. I talked to a technician that I got to know, and she said that this week this problem started occurring with customers who have extremes of the airport. Something about the airport in IPV6 and this is not compatible. Before systems were PVI until the numbers came out (?) In any case, she said Cox could not fix this, that I needed to talk to Apple to see if I could disable IPV6, at least for now. I think I see how to do this, but does it make sense to anyone? We have a new modem, installed in January, Cisco DPQ3212, good speeds, no issues whatsoever until this week. There are also 2 other friends here (Scottsdale, Cox) with extremes of the airport. Any suggestions?

Cox has made a number of recent changes to their service, and they are trying to integrate IPv6 technology into their signals. They have not fully implemented the changes that must be made, and not commit to a date where things will be fully installed.

Everything was fine until Cox implements these recent changes, and now Cox is blaming the problem on Apple. Apple has a different answer, as you can imagine. It is typical among manufacturers... blame the other guy.

Apple routers are picking up some of the information they need to work with IPv6 and Cox, but since Cox has not completed the process, you'll probably best results trying to not use IPv6 with the airport router at all until you receive word of Cox that their systems are ready.

The bottom line to this problem can be resolved by asking "What has changed". The answer is Cox has changed.

Configure your router to the airport most convenient to use IPv6 local link parameters only for now, to see if this will help. You will not be able to realize all the benefits of IPv6 at the moment, but I hope that things will improve.

"Mesh" networking Possible with the Airport extreme?

Now many of you may have heard talk about Eero and Luma, whose routers create a scope "mesh" network by installing 2-3 of their units close to each other. Whether you're home devices move from one access point to another without a decrease in performance. In my current setup, I have two extremes from the Airport (connected both) with SSID same, however when I wander around the House, my camera will not let go the first AE until I am in the vicinity of the second AE, how I am down to 1-2 bars of signal, and then at a certain point of annoyance it passes to the 2nd AE with a signal stronger. Y at - it a setting that I can change which will preserve my investment in my AE current infrastructure, and to somehow get our roaming devices more intuitively go to the AP with the strongest signal faster?

Thanks in advance.

Y at - it a setting that I can change which will preserve my investment in my AE current infrastructure, and to somehow get our roaming devices more intuitively go to the AP with the strongest signal faster?

Unfortunately, Apple provides no practical possibility for the user to adjust parameters either on an AirPort base station or computer or other mobile device WiFi, that would allow a device go faster... or more slowly... as "wandering" on a network with several access points.

Macs will usually do a good job to switch automatically from one access point to another as they move from one place to another, but most of the PC, tablets, iPhones, and iPads will do that very well... If they do it in all. With most mobile devices, you will need to temporarily disable the WiFI on the device when it is moved from one place to the other, then re - turn on the WiFi at the new location... and the device will usually pick up the signal from the access point closest and strongest.

Signal (PAL 60) record with the Qosmio G40 Line In (Capture) Option

I'm in Australia - and I have a lot of NTSC video tapes I want to MPEG...

These bands play very well on all the TVs/LCD TV in the House.

Qosmio G40 seems to have problems with PAL 60 signal that sends my VHS player...

My VHS/DVD from Toshiba drive is to convert NTSC to PAL 60 signal - as this VHS player bought in Australia - this seems to be the Australian standard bought a VHS/DVD player.

There is no option on the VHS player to the NTSC signal... I tried another VHS player - and it gives me the same output PAL 60, this player also could leave the NTSC signal...

So I wonder if the Qosmio G40 is able to record the signal PAL 60 - maybe I'm missing a setting somewhere...

I use Ulead movie maker software, which is supplied with the machine... but I don't see any options on the support PAL 60...
Maybe the TV card installed in the machine does not support PAL 60 - I can't find any info about this...

Maybe I need to use a software of different capture which will support PAL 60 options...
Or maybe I just buy a VHS of America drive, and qosmio q40 will capture the NTSC image very well... (I already have a few products from 110V at home)

Any thoughts?

Hello

I'm not sure if this is possible, but you can check the BIOS settings, if there is an option that would allows you to change settings of NTCS/PAL.

Check it out

Is it possible to route signals of relaxation between two chassis PXI-1002 with the PXI-8335?

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for