Is there a difference in performance between Automation Plug-ins and script system?

Similar Questions

• How Automation plug-ins appears under the Help menu?

  Hello

  My Automation plug-ins appear in the controller menu, and it works.

  Here too the menu and submenu. Find and select my plug-in is boring.

  How does appear under Help menu?

  change pipl file may resolve this problem. code is below

  resource "PiPL" (XXXID, "AutomationFilter," purgeable)

  {

  {

  Like {action},

  Name {plugInName'... »},

  Category {' * Help * '}, //Use category {' * Help * '} plugin automation will be under the Help menu

  {"Another string"} category, category {"another string"} //Use plugin automation will be under file | Automation menu.

  Thank you.

• Is there a difference in features between the version of the apple store and the best version to buy for the Apple Watch?

  I plan to buy a Apple Watch for my sister's birthday and I was wondering if there is a difference in features between buying the Apple Watch on an apple store or buy the Apple Watch at a best buy.

  No difference, but better to buy directly from Apple if the watch should repair at any given time. Best Buy customer service isn't the best.

  The user guide will be useful > https://help.apple.com/watch/

  The watch can be purchased from an Apple store or online > https://www.apple.com/watch/

• determine the difference in phase between a reference signal and measure

  Hello

  I use a PXI-1000 b with two cards DAQ, PXI-6133 and I need to measure the difference in phase between a reference sinusoid, acquired on a map and an acquis of the sinusoid measured on the other card.  So far, my idea is simply to acquire samples of N of these two signas as waveform data, then compare.  My problem is that I see a way to extract the information from the relative phase.  How would I do that?  Is there a better way to achieve this end?

  Hey GlenS

  Check out this link. Use it a Subvi spend an entry as the data acquisition card entry and the other your reference wave. It should work.

  Good luck

  -laboratory

• Is there a good resource that compares the difference in performance between 2.7 GHz Intel vs. the 3.2 GHz?

  We run El Capitan and CC Adobe Creative Suite at work and need to cost justify a move.

  Any information would be appreciated.

  Thank you

  https://browser.primatelabs.com/Mac-benchmarks

• The difference in performance between wins 8 and win 7.

  What performance difference is there between winning 8 and win 7, or does go through whats in win 8 which is not in win 7?

  What performance difference is there between winning 8 and win 7, or does go through whats in win 8 which is not in win 7?

  http://www.TechSpot.com/review/561-Windows8-vs-Windows7/

  http://www.TechRadar.com/us/news/software/operating-systems/Windows-8-vs-Windows-7-8-ways-its-different-1025285

  http://www.askvg.com/comparison-between-Windows-7-and-Windows-8-memory-management-system/

• new hard drive - what is the difference in performance between the new installation of Windows 7 or a clone of old hard drive?

  I get a new hard Hard Drive (SSD).  The new disc is the same size as my existing SATA drive.  I can do either a new

  the installation of Windows 7 or a clone old hard drive?  I would prefer to clone the old hard drive and keep all my settings, etc.   It's empirical data on the performance difference between a new installation of Windows 7 or to continue with the Windows 7 which was 3 or 4 years ago.

  I know the conventional wisdom is that the new installation is faster, but, no matter who actually tested and compared the differences?  I know I'll get better performance of the SSD the SATA drive, but I don't know if it's worth the hassle to do a fresh install and redo all my programs and settings.

  Others that the performance of the SSD you should not see any differences.  If you do, you can always do a clean installation later.

• The size of a difference in performance between the two different graphics cards

  Hey, I'm in the middle of upgrading my system and I try to spend my tax return on0 graphics cards. I'll run an SLI with Nvidia GTX 660 or 680 GTX. Now I realize the 680 is high the hand better than 660 I want to know is, it is better to the difference in price proformance wise. I intend to get two of them and SLI them, here are the two that I'm looking

  http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127699 - GTX 660

  http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127723 - GTX 680

  I'm running CS6 if I want to stay in the 600 series of Nvidia cards that are on the whitelist for CS6. I want to choose between these two cards because I'm under eyefinity right now and I can't go back, these Nvidia Surround support out of the box with any necessary adapters. MSI heatsinks are also fantastic with these cards.

  So basically what I'm asking, is the proformance go with 2 of the 680 years is worth the $500 price difference?

  Here is my system in its present form:

  Processor: AMD Phenom II X 6 3.2 GHz-> go to AMD 9590 x 8 5 GHz after I buy graphics cards

  RAM 16 GB Corsair Dominator 8-8-8-20

  Samsung 840 EVO 250 GB SSD (drive)

  Corsair 64 GB SSD as a scratch disk

  2 TB WD Black HDD as mass storage

  AMD Radion 6790-> will upgrading to one of the above cards

  Windows 8.1

  For After Effects, there is no reason to spend the extra money, unless you use a specific feature: the 3D rendering engine traced to the RADIUS. If you do not use this feature, and your focus is After Effects, then spend your extra money on RAM and SSD.

  See this page for more information about how After Effects uses the GPU:

  http://blogs.Adobe.com/AfterEffects/2012/05/GPU-CUDA-OpenGL-features-in-after-effects-CS6. HTML

  See this page for more information on material for Premiere Pro and Adobe After Effects: http://adobe.ly/pRYOuk

• Difference in performance between the CTA and INSERT / * + APPEND * / IN

  Hi all

  I have a question about the ETG and "Insert / * + Append * / Into" statements.

  Suite deal, I have a question that I did not understand the difference in operating times EXADATA.

  The two tables of selection (g02_f01 and g02_f02) have not any partition. But I could partition tables with the method of partition by column "ip_id" hash and I tried to run the same query with partition tables. Change anything in execution times.

  I executed plan gather statistics for all tables. The two paintings were 13.176.888 records. The two arrays have same "ip_id' unique columns. I want to combine these tables into a single table.

  First request:

  Insert / * + append parallel (a, 16) * / in dg.tiz_irdm_g02_cc one

  (ip_id, process_date,...)

  Select / * + parallel (a, 16) parallel (16B) * / *.

  tgarstg.tst_irdm_g02_f01 a.,

  tgarstg.tst_irdm_g02_f02 b

  where a.ip_id = b.ip_id

  
  

  Elapsed = > 45: 00 minutes
  

  
  

  Second request:

  create table dg.tiz_irdm_g02_cc nologging parallel 16 compress for than query

  Select / * + parallel (a, 16) (b, 16) parallel * / *.

  tgarstg.tst_irdm_g02_f01 a.,

  tgarstg.tst_irdm_g02_f02 b

  where a.ip_id = b.ip_id

  Elapsed = > 04:00 minutes

  
  

  Execution plans are:

  
  

  1. Enter the statement execution Plan:

  Hash value of plan: 3814019933

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | TempSpc | Cost (% CPU). Time |    TQ | IN-OUT | PQ Distrib.

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | INSERT STATEMENT.                  |    13 M |    36G |       |   127K (1) | 00:00:05 |        |      |            |

  |   1.  LOAD SELECT ACE | TIZ_IRDM_G02_CC |       |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |

  |   2.   COORDINATOR OF PX |                  |       |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |

  |   5:    PX SEND QC (RANDOM). : TQ10002 |    13 M |    36G |       |   127K (1) | 00:00:05 |  Q1, 02 | P > S | QC (RAND) |

  |*  4 |     IN THE BUFFER HASH JOIN |                  |    13 M |    36G |   921 M |   127K (1) | 00:00:05 |  Q1, 02 | SVCP |            |

  |   3:      RECEIVE PX |                  |    13 M |    14G |       |  5732 (5) | 00:00:01 |  Q1, 02 | SVCP |            |

  |   6.       PX SEND HASH | : TQ10000 |    13 M |    14G |       |  5732 (5) | 00:00:01 |  Q1 00 | P > P | HASH |

  |   7.        ITERATOR BLOCK PX |                  |    13 M |    14G |       |  5732 (5) | 00:00:01 |  Q1 00 | ISSUE |            |

  |   8.         STORE TABLE FULL ACCESS | TST_IRDM_G02_F02 |    13 M |    14G |       |  5732 (5) | 00:00:01 |  Q1 00 | SVCP |            |

  |   9.      RECEIVE PX |                  |    13 M |    21G |       | 18353 (3) | 00:00:01 |  Q1, 02 | SVCP |            |

  |  10.       PX SEND HASH | : TQ10001 |    13 M |    21G |       | 18353 (3) | 00:00:01 |  Q1, 01 | P > P | HASH |

  |  11.        ITERATOR BLOCK PX |                  |    13 M |    21G |       | 18353 (3) | 00:00:01 |  Q1, 01 | ISSUE |            |

  |  12.         STORE TABLE FULL ACCESS | TST_IRDM_G02_F01 |    13 M |    21G |       | 18353 (3) | 00:00:01 |  Q1, 01 | SVCP |            |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  4 - access("AIRDM_G02_F01".") IP_ID '= 'AIRDM_G02_F02'.' IP_ID")

  2 - DEC execution Plan:

  Hash value of plan: 3613570869

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | TempSpc | Cost (% CPU). Time |    TQ | IN-OUT | PQ Distrib.

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | CREATE TABLE STATEMENT.                  |    13 M |    36G |       |   397K (1) | 00:00:14 |        |      |            |

  |   1.  COORDINATOR OF PX |                  |       |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |

  |   2.   PX SEND QC (RANDOM). : TQ10002 |    13 M |    36G |       |   255K (1) | 00:00:09 |  Q1, 02 | P > S | QC (RAND) |

  |   3.    LOAD SELECT ACE | TIZ_IRDM_G02_CC |       |       |       |            |          |  Q1, 02 | SVCP |            |

  |*  4 |     HASH JOIN |                  |    13 M |    36G |  1842M |   255K (1) | 00:00:09 |  Q1, 02 | SVCP |            |

  |   5.      RECEIVE PX |                  |    13 M |    14G |       | 11465 (5) | 00:00:01 |  Q1, 02 | SVCP |            |

  |   6.       PX SEND HASH | : TQ10000 |    13 M |    14G |       | 11465 (5) | 00:00:01 |  Q1 00 | P > P | HASH |

  |   7.        ITERATOR BLOCK PX |                  |    13 M |    14G |       | 11465 (5) | 00:00:01 |  Q1 00 | ISSUE |            |

  |   8.         STORE TABLE FULL ACCESS | TST_IRDM_G02_F02 |    13 M |    14G |       | 11465 (5) | 00:00:01 |  Q1 00 | SVCP |            |

  |   9.      RECEIVE PX |                  |    13 M |    21G |       | 36706 (3) | 00:00:02 |  Q1, 02 | SVCP |            |

  |  10.       PX SEND HASH | : TQ10001 |    13 M |    21G |       | 36706 (3) | 00:00:02 |  Q1, 01 | P > P | HASH |

  |  11.        ITERATOR BLOCK PX |                  |    13 M |    21G |       | 36706 (3) | 00:00:02 |  Q1, 01 | ISSUE |            |

  |  12.         STORE TABLE FULL ACCESS | TST_IRDM_G02_F01 |    13 M |    21G |       | 36706 (3) | 00:00:02 |  Q1, 01 | SVCP |            |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  4 - access("AIRDM_G02_F01".") IP_ID '= 'AIRDM_G02_F02'.' IP_ID")

  Oracle version:

  Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64 bit Production

  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.4.0 - Production

  CORE Production 11.2.0.4.0

  AMT for Linux: Version 11.2.0.4.0 - Production

  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.4.0 - Production

  Notice how this additional distribution has disappeared from the non-partitioned table.

  I think that with the partitioned table that oracle has tried to balance the number of slaves against the number of scores he expected to use and decided to distribute the data to get a 'fair sharing' workload, but had not authorized for the side effects of the buffer hash join which was to appear and extra messaging for distribution.

  You could try the indicator pq_distribute() for the insert to tell Oracle that he should not disrtibute like that. for example, based on your original code:

  Insert / * + append pq_distribute parallel (a, 16) (a zero) * / in dg.tiz_irdm_g02_cc one...

  This can give you the performance you want with the partitioned table, but check what it does to the space allocation that it can introduce a large number (16) of extensions by segment that are not completely filled and therefore be rather waste of space.

  Concerning

  Jonathan Lewis

• Differences in performance between ESX and HyperV

  Hi all

  Is there someone out there who might be able to shed light on a VMware technical questions we do?

  We have a customer who has two servers spec looks like a running VMware ESX 5i and another running Server 2008 R2 HyperV. Each server has a single CPU VM running on this Server 2008 R2 running with identical amounts of RAM. HyperV server is equipped with Intel X 5650 processors, ESX Server has Intel E5-2630 procs.

  VM HyperV under load shows about 50% less CPU usage to the ESX Server VM under the same load even if the virtual machines are very similar specified. The two are running the same application and the same load.

  The customer asked us to explain why there is such a marked difference.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Richard

  I mean on the hardware itself.

• Is there a difference in quality between folios online and offline?

  My work on an iPad app is almost finished, but since there are a lot of audio files in it, the folio will have a size of 200 MB.

  Although I often tried to download the folio - view of all the instructions to download a single folio - I wasn't able to download the entire folio so far; most likey because the folio is too important.

  My question: is equivalent to the quality of a folio from a folio online offline? If so, I could take the folio offline to build the application.

  No, there is no difference.

  Neil

• Why is there a difference in length between 24 fps and fps 23 976 timelines with the same clip?

  I was working on a project of 23 976 fps and I tried to import a short animated sequence of 44 TIFFs in my scenario in my first CS5.

  I imported the sequence, interpreting the film at 23 976 fps (such as it was made in AE) to check before sending it to a finished House.

  First issue. Even if I set the framerate 23 976, first CS5, indicates me 23.98 on interpreting window film. I assumed it as a rounded number.

  When I drag the attachment to my 23 976 sequence, the clip shows 43 (!) length of frames on the info panel. It lacks an image. The sequence in the original video, it really lacks a framework.

  I decided to do a test. And placed the same clip, interpreted the same way on a sequence of 24 frames per second, and the clip shows as length of 44 executives on the info panel.

  How can we, same clip shows the different quantity of frames (I don't mean time, but just raw images), on different times? It makes no sense at all! If my sequence has 44 frames, it should show in the form of 44 independent frames of the scenario that I imported it. Am I entitled?

  Just for test, I ve imported from the same sequence on AE, and in it shows as 44 frames on a timeline 23 976. How can I trust to first frame interpret in this way?

  Just one thing. The scene used as basis for the animation of the AE, has 44 executives, and it was measured and cut in a 30s film on the same first which is having this weird behavior.

  Can someone explain to me what Just happened? It s driving me crazy!

  Thanks in advance

  Mauricio Mendes

  Before you import the sequence of images, go to Edit > Preferences > media... and together the basis of split time at 23.976.

• Differences in time between the start date and end Date

  I have a requirement to get the difference between the two dates, I am on the syntax below to fill, but it does not work. The syntax is the following:
  TimestampDiff (SQL_TSI_MONTH, "[< dStart_Date_ITAG >]", '[< dEnd_Date_ITAG >]'). Could you please help me on this. Thanks in advance
  
  Olivier

  Hello Roytson,

  I want to enjoy the sytem itself, I mean there are 2 custom fields start date and enddate, my function should take system only do not enter manually.
  could you please develop this thing.

• Is there a way to cause (or uncause) your computer to delay while you type. In other words, there is a large gap between when I type and when the characters actually appear.

  My son hit the keyboard and somehow changed the way in which the computer types. There is a long delay before appear it the keys I have tap on the screen. It's a frustrating way to type. Does anyone have an idea if it's a shortcut that I can disable or what other explanation/solution can exist. Thank you.

  Hello

  Power - off wait a few minutes and power on again to allow a full reset.

  There may be a stuck key check so the area where it hit.

  This happens in all such programs as IE, Notepad, WordPad and others?

  I hope this helps.

  Rob - bicycle - Mark Twain said it is good.

• difference of simulation between multisim 10.1 and 14.0

  I've been using Multisim 10.1 for check and create examples for students and want to spend 14 Multisim. Simulating a small ac-circuit I got different using multisim 10.1 and 14 results.

  

  The result of multisim 10.1 is identical with the manual solution.

  No idea, what could be the problem?

  concerning

  blanne

  Hi Blanne:

  The default setting of simulation in Multisim is letting his engine to automatically determine the TMAX, the maximum allowed timestep. In version 13, we have modified this code in such a way that it will leave the slower to simulate faster real-time frequency circuits, we did this in order to accelerate simulations as requested by users. Most of the time, this change has worked as expected, but your circuit is a clear example of a negative effect of this change. Its accuracy is affected by larger time.

  In your evaluation of Multisim 14, you can quickly change that. Click on the Interactive analysis button in the toolbar to open the properties of the analysis and in the analysis of Simulation Interactive > look tab crawl settings for the checkbox control labeled step of maximum (TMAX), place a check and let it set to 1e-005. Make your simulation again and you will now see the 1.155 a result in the multimeter.

  (Version 14 has been automatically calculate the TMAX as 1.25e - 003)

  I'll file a defect report so we review how automatically determine us TMAX so he will not state as in this example. I hope my explanation helps you advance your evaluation of the software.

  Kind regards