Issue license - 4 physical processors

Similar Questions

• Licenses for single processor in a server dual socket

  Hi, I keep getting conflicting information regarding the authorization of a CPU socket server two filled with a single processor. The question is what I have to concede to the number of available sockets on a given server even if not all are met? For example, if I have a server for 2 sockets with a single physical processor installed, can I get a license ESX Server for a processor or two outlets available?

  I thought that strategy was changed in 2008, according to the statement of VMware (link below), but one of my colleagues contacted VMware support this last July asking this question and I was told that each outlet available should be allowed regardless of if they are populated with a processor.

  VMware uniprocessor license policy

  It is a new implementation of Enterprise vSphere 4.1 on compatible servers HCL with centralized authorization.

  Thank you

  You will need the licenses by "processor in a socket.

  of http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vsphere_pricing.pdf

  Capacity of the CPU

  Each kit of vSphere or edition is allowed on a per processor basis,

  Depending on the number of physical processors (CPUS) on each host.

  In the case of the kits of vSphere, the payment listed for the capacity of the CPU

  discussed later in this document applies to more than one host.

  Visitors can buy and deploy or redeploy any combination of servers,

  as required; each processor in a socket may contain multiple cores.

  ...

  André

• License for 2 processors

  Hello

  I have an ESXI 4.0 (I think my question is the same for esxi 3.5) on a server with 2 processors so 2 x 4 hearts.

  My question is simple:

  (1) how to activate all the hearts (so 8 covers) on my windows server?

  (2) how to activate 1CPU so 4 cores on a windows server and the second processor on another?

  PS: my license: product: ESXi 4 server only allowed for 2 physical processors

  Thx a lot

  Hello

  You can have virtual machines with 8 vCPUs with vSphere Enterprise Plus allowed. If you do not have it, you can use that 4 vCPUs.

  If you configure 2 virtual machines with 4 vCPUs, is mos likely probable that each virtual machine will use half of your physical CPU. The ESX consumes 1 of them, but not all the time, and control virtual machines so that they can be distributed in an equitable manner between the virtual machines. You can have more vCPUs than physical CPU without problem.

  I hope this helps.

  Marcelo Soares

  VMWare Certified Professional 310

  Technical Support Engineer

  Chief Executive Officer of the Linux server

• Microsoft has stopped issuing licenses for windows 2008R2 Enterprise edition?

  Please specify if Microsoft has stopped issuing licenses for windows 2008 R2 64-bit Enterprise edition.

  Kind regards

  Aravind.

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

• What is the maximum number of physical processors that are supported by Windows XP?

  What is the maximum number of physical processors that are supported by Windows XP?

  2 for the professionals and 1 for the House as far as I know.

• 2 physical processors with free ESXi 5.1?

  Hello world

  I apologize if this has been cleared up before, but I found several contradictory answers.

  I have a Poweredge 1950 III server that was given to me by a friend after having been abandoned. I have it at home, want to run ESXi free 5.1 there, but am curious to know if I'll be able to use two physical processors that are in the machine.

  Thanks in advance!

  -Chris

  There is no limitation on the physical processors, only the physical memory (32GB).

• Hosts in cluster with a different number of physical processors

  Hello

  Don't think it would be a problem but just validate...

  Can I have a cluster where the hosts have a different number of physical processors. All processors will be the same make\model\speed. Also, it will be only a temporary configuration.

  Thank you

  Hello.

  This configuration is very good.

  Good luck!

• Issue license ROBO

  Hello

  Hoping someone can help me solve a license problem I have...

  We have several hosts of ESXi 5.1 existing in the branches (1 per branch), they are currently licensed using the free version of ESXi. I would now like to add these servers to a new Server Standard central vCenter 5.5 so they can be managed through that. For this we bought licenses of VM ROBO 125 (Standard) licence.

  My plan was just to add a hosts to vCenter both and change them to ROBO licenses however the first snag I hit was that you can't add a free licensed with ESXi host to vCenter, just enough so I thought I'd just change it back to the eval method to add it and then modify and utilize licensed ROBO. However, it seems that the eval mode has been fully utilized until the free license has been added so I can't change it back to the eval mode.

  I then noticed that we had a business license of 5.5 spare CPU 2 on the vCenter, so I added the host (change so that it uses this license during the import process). It worked and the host is now in vCenter using the company key 5.5 (although it shows as using a key Enterprise 5.1 of the same number), he didn't complain that the license key was invalid due to me using a key of 5.5 to a host 5.1 of the license.

  However when I went to change to use the ROBO button, I get a an error 'A specified setting is not correct: licenseKey " and it won't let me change the license ROBO. It is not clear to me why I am getting this error, but is there a specific problem with a host from a host permits licensed ROBO (I have not found anything about it)? I found this article VMware KB: licensing to a host ESXi fails with the error: a specified parameter is not correct: licenseKey which indicates that there might be a license version number issue however I would have thought I would have got this error when I tried to apply the license 5.5 host to the host in the first place but that has worked well. The ROBO in vCenter license just said v5 rather than v5.5 is therefore a specific point of ROBO license version and I need to downgrade to get a license for 5.1 or is going on here about something else?

  Thank you

  Nick

  I could be wrong, but this could be linked to the ESXi/vCenter Server version you are using. If I understand correctly the ROBO new licenses properly, by VM license requires ESXi and vCenter 5.5 Update 2 or later (see for example compare VMware vSphere Editions). In previous versions ROBO has been licensed by processor.

  André

• MS win Server R2 2012 and Hyper-V issue licenses

  My company has 60 employees (and 60 desktops / laptops) and currently have an old principle that server solution of Microsoft Basic with element a cloud as Office 365 for email only. We seek to reduce the estate of server to Server (2 CPU - Dell PowerEdge T610), it currently runs on two old but not sterilized systems running Windows Server 2003 R2 (Dell PowerEdge 2900) and Windows Server 2008 R2 (Dell PowerEdge T610).

  In the short term, we want to create a brand new installation of MS Windows Server R2 Standard edition 2012 who will manage our advertising (and DC) and support businesses main accounting IRIS software that requires a MS SQL DB. This cloud all must be configured to allow integration with MS Azure Site recovery to allow us to turn up in the azure of the VM disaster. In my view, this means that the configuration of the OS as a Hyper-V virtual machine instance.

  The new server Win 2012 R2 has not really be a VM as its only one instance that I need, but from what I can make out, I need to make a virtual of Hyper-V machine to join the recovery Site of France. I can't determine exactly what license I need to achieve however. Any help would be appreciated.

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  *
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum

• Streets & trips 2011 installation issues, license inititalization, error 0 x 80070020

  I down loaded the iternet 2011, I have not a dvd drive only a cd drive.  I can run 2011, but cannot save it, I have to keep my old 2002 streets & trips disc in the cd drive.

  Hello

  You can try the troubleshooting provided in the link below steps to fix the problem.

  MapPoint or Streets & Trips does not respond or gives an error message on the license when you try to start the program

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/951632

  Note:

  Ignore the error message, the link above applies to issues through a license.

  See also:

  Support for MapPoint, streets & trips and Highway

  http://support.Microsoft.com/ph/851

• BPEL Process Manager developer - issue license

  My company is licensed for BPEL PM and there on several servers. I'm a developer to create programs for my business I'm official... not a contractor. All programs are deployed to our development servers.
  
  I want to install BPEL PM on my laptop. This would allow me to put offline and also to work around any problems that arise on the development such as table querying server or queue crashes and necessary reboots, etc.
  
  The installation of BPEL PM is allowed free of charge on a pc developer for this situation?

  Technically no, but you can be covered by the OTN license. When you download the software from OTN you sign a contract. IF you feel that you are covered in the present virtue then go nuts.

  How customers is generally have licenses processors, for the production and the user Named for development license test, etc. You need a minimum to 10 named users per CPU of your dev to test environments. If your company has purchased more then you could use some of these licenses, but remember you will have 10 not one as it is a new machine.

  see you soon
  James

• Issue update Compaq 6510 processor b

  Hello
  
  I'm about to upgrade the laptop processor for my Compaq 6510 b-computer that currently has the Intel Celeron 540 (1.86 GHz) processor. I studied the latest international document quickspecs (p. 4), which says that the laptop must be compatible with the Intel Core 2 Duo T7700, which I would be interested in upgrading to.
  
  However, I noticed that there are 4 different "versions" of this processor on the market of the product descripition Intel. These "versions" are called: SLA43, SLAF7, SLA3M and SLADL. Now I'm about to buy the tray (no not in box) SLAF7-model, but would like confirmation that this model works with the Compaq 6510 b-computer laptop?

  I did some additional research on the 4 models and thought I'd do a short summary on them even, because someone might find it useful. From my understanding and looking at the "'Ordering / sSpecs / Steppings"-page on the left side of theIntel product description page, both latter models (SLA3M, SLADL) are models of Ball Grid Array (BGA), which means they are soldered on the motherboard and so I can't use them for an upgrade. " However, the SLA43 and SLAF7 models are the two tables in grid Pin (PGA) and so I should be able to upgrade to one of these. The only difference between the SLA43 a SLAF7 of models is that they have different steps: "E1" and "G0". However, it seems that in practice this difference in step by step is an important place. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
  
  Thank you in advance for your help!

  The best way to get more information is by checking the specs on the numbers for INTEL processors optionally simplify research candidate upgrade.

  Intel Core Duo T7700 2.4 GHz with 4 MB of cache L2 446894-001

  It can be found at a reasonable price. I found one was offered at $60.00 USD.

  http://www.serversupply.com/processors/Intel%20Core%202%20Duo/2.4GHz%20-%20800MHZ%20FSB/HP/446894-001.htm

  

• A9K-iVRF-LIC ASR9k issue license

  Hello.

  I have problems with the vrf license in ios - xr. I installed the VRF license and it seems to work. But when I leave the config vrf, the following error message appears in the buffer;

  % LICENSE-ASR9K_LICENSE-2-INFRA_VRF_NEEDED: 1 VRF (s) are configured without a valid licence / license configuration A9K-iVRF-LIC in violation of the S...

  Some out of the router.

  SH of license

  FeatureID: A9K-iVRF-LIC (location of function, Permanent)

  Total licenses 1

  Available for use 1

  Assigned to the location 0

  0 active

  Permanent store name

  Store index 1

  Pool: owner

  Total of the licenses in the pool: 1

  Status: Available operational 1: 0

  SH license administration Journal

  #ID: SDR: FeatureID: NodeID: time: newspaper

  1: owner: None: 0/RSP0 / CPU0:Thu May 19 14:16:07 2011: license add successful to work: command "A9K-iVRF-LIC" license "license add DTS disk0: / xxx.lic Ow.

  SH license operational log

  29: owner: A9K-iVRF-LIC: 1/0/CPU0: kills Aug 23 10:52:12 2011: license_acquire: opaque_string (null), result ("License Manager" detected the condition 'warning' 'No such license')

  I really don't understand what the problem is all about. Any ideas?

  Concerning

  Andreas

  
  

  Hi andreas,

  in versions after 40 x you must manually assing the license to the slot.

  your output, it seems you have not assigned this lic yet, because it shows avaiable.

  Here are the steps:

  RP/0/RSP0 / CPU0:A9K - BNG #admin

  Tue Aug 23 12:34:52.569 EDT

  RP/0/RSP0 / CPU0:A9K - BNG (admin) #conf

  Tue Aug 23 12:34:53.678 EDT

  RP/0/RSP0 / CPU0:A9K - BNG(admin-config) #license NAME location?

  0/0/CPU0 qualified full of specifying the location

  0/1/CPU0 qualified full of specifying the location

  0/RSP0/CPU0 qualified full of specifying the location

  0/RSP1/CPU0 qualified full of specifying the location

  The WORD fully qualified location specification

  all of the locations of all the

  RP/0/RSP0 / CPU0:A9K - BNG(admin-config) #license NAME location

  Xander Thuijs, CCIE #6775

  SR. Tech ASR9000 lead

• Issue license CAM

  Hello guys, I have ´ve tried to add CAS server in a CAM, but I got an error that says:

  Failed to add the server: Maximum limit for access servers own supported has been reached

  but the CAM has a great current license as well as a License Manager Failover Manager. This license has been sent to me by Cisco

  Product name: NACMGR-40FB-K9
  Product description: NAC Appliance 3390 Manager failover Bundle - max 40 servers

  What could be the problem?  Thanks for the help...

  Hi muozmellado,

  To add the CASE to the CAM you have the license CASE. for the license in CASE you will need to request with product authorization key (PAK) that is comes with AC. During this process, you will need to provide both mac address (primary and secondary) of CAM. Once you get the license CASE installation this license in cam and try adding CASES in the CAM.

  Thank you

• Issue license on device ACS C1121

  Hi all

  I have the script as below:

  01. I'm a customer unit C1121 ACS system comes with version 5.1. The customer buy the basic and important deployment as well as the purchase license.

  02 fact is that I have manually update the system to version 5.3.0.40 and request a license to test for the administration of the unit.

  My question is:

  a. If I now using the purchased base license and great deployment PAK to activate the system, it would still be worthwhile for me to continue to use the Version 5.3.0.40?

  Thank you

  Noel

  Hello

  Yes, GBA 5.x is a licensed application. You can install your licenses on any version 5.x of CSA without any problem. Licenses are not version specific.

  If this was helpful please note.

  Kind regards.