LAN to LAN VPN by MPLS

We have 2 sites HQ and remote connected with MPLS as pictured above. There are applications in the DMZ s who need to talk to each other, but the communication goes through the remote local network (DMZ - LAN HQ - HQ DMZ) but we do not want the DMZ to communicate with each other via the local network. We want to configure a VPN tunnel between Headquarters and remote Firewalls so that all communications between the DMZ through a VPN MPLS tunnel via the LAN. Is this considered a Layer2 VPN or Layer 3 VPN model and also is there a special setup that needs to be done other than config normal site-to-site VPN Firewall.

Thank you

This is the layer 3 VPN and no special configuration required on the firewall other than the normal site-to-site VPN. Just activate the isakmp and apply crypto map to the LAN interface.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Using configuration for the 2nd link of lan to lan vpn

    Hello

    Successfully, I configured a connection of lan to lan vpn between two offices. I try to add another link to a 3rd office to my office at home, but have some difficulty. I have attached my setup and hope someone can help me solve my problem. Right now I have a working vpn to the 172.16.0.0/24 network and putting in place the link to 172.16.3.0/24 so. For the new vpn connection, I can ping the external interfaces, but can't ping anything in-house.

    Thanks for your time and help,

    Jason

    Jason

    There is a major mistake that's easy to fix. You have successfully created a second instance of the encryption card to create a VPN tunnel for the second site. But as currently configured two instances of the encryption card use the same access list:

    1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap

    match address 100

    5 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap

    match address 100

    But each session/tunnel VPN needs its own access list. So, I suggest that you make the following changes:

    5 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap

    match address 101

    no access list 100

    access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.0.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.3.0 0.0.0.255

    This provides a list of separate for each session/tunnel access and should solve this problem. Try it and tell us the result.

    HTH

    Rick

  • VPN to access LAN VPN clinet.

    We use a PIX 515 as the hub of a LAN to LAN VPN as well as to access VPN Clinet. Using a multipoint configuration sites speaks (all PIX 501) are able to communicate with each other. However, the VPN to access the 515 client are not able to access the VPN sites has talked about. I think that it is due to the fact that put an end to all tunnels on the same interface of the PIX 515. Is there a way to allow the VPN CLient to communicate with the LAN VPN spoke?

    Concerning

    PD

    Currently, it is not a good way to meet the requirements above. However, add us a new item (or rather, a restriction of relax) for the PIX 7.0 code (to be released in December/January) to allow clients VPN packets 'u-turn' on a Hub PIX to PIX spoke connected via Lan-to-Lan tunnels. The program 7.0 beta is about to begin (may have just begun) so if interested, please contact your local account engineer Cisco. Sorry for the news but help is on the way.

    Scott

  • How to set up a Lan to Lan VPN without using your external IP address?

    I have two 28 subnets A & B.

    My PIX and ASA outside interface addresses are both in A subnet.

    I am in the middle of a migration of the PIX to ASA and need to use the PIX outside of the address of the interface on the ASA for the last two remaining lan to lan VPN.

    I do like that because the sellers of these virtual private networks to connect to are huge dinosaurs IT and the aaages to get their sh * t tri... This means that I have to pass the IP address to my ASA, so I can't sentence have change for a new IP peer.

    I tried to figure out how to set a specific my counterpart VPN IP address but I can't figure out how...

    I even physically connected a second ethernet port and tried to give a similar IP in the same range, which it says it is not possible to have both outside the IP addresses on the same subnet.

    Hello

    It is not possible to have an IP address "secondary" on the physics/logic interface of a Cisco firewall.

    And as you've noticed, you cannot configure the same subnet on 2 different interface either.

    We are talking about such a large configuration that you want to just migrate from completely to the ASA PIX and make a switch during a maintenance window?

    Couldn't you just pass the ASAs 'outside' IP address address to that on the PIX and move the ASAs 'outside' of the PIX? Or not the ASAs "outside" IP address already some configured related to what makes this impossible?

    -Jouni

  • VPN Remote LAN to LAN VPN issues

    The issue I'm having is that I have an ASA that provides Lan to Lan VPN and remote access VPN.  Lan to Lan VPN connects to another network where a remote server, and the remote vpn connects remote users to the LAN.  The two virtual private networks are currently working, however users remote connection via the remote access vpn can not connect to the server over the lan to lan vpn.  Here's our Installer.

    ASA - LAN to LAN VPN - ASA - LAN Local - Server

    |

    |

    Remote VPN access

    |

    |

    Remote users

    In this configuration remote users can access the local network, the server can access the local network, and the local network can access the server and remote users.  However, the server cannot access the remote users and remote users cannot access the server.  Any ideas on how to get this to work would be much appreciated.  I created the NAT rules I think were needed and added the necessary address so that the user remote vpn' client application lists the network on the otherside of the vpn as routable network LAN to LAN.  Also, I believe that all the rules of access are correct as tracers of package on both sides are successful.  However when you try to ping across the remote client on the server at the other end of the L2L it fails as other attempts to access the server like rdp.  Does anyone have a step by step on how to set up this type of vpn configuration remote and l2l configured on asa while leaving the two virtual private networks talk to each other.  By the way are two ASA 5505 that with two virtual private networks in this configuration is one on the other end of the l2l 7.2 and 8.2.  Any help would be appreciated, especially a tuturail or a list of commands needed to implement, because I think that I'm probably missing just a little extra configuration, I just can not understand.

    Use your favorite search engine "permit same-security-traffic intra-interface"

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

  • Lan to lan VPN and VPNclient support at the same time?

    Hello I have a 2811 router.

    I put up as a VPN with Clients_vpn hub connect to it, and I used an IPSec on a stick configuration.

    At the same time, I would need to use the same Lan - to - Lan IPSec router to other different sites 2.

    I can't figure out how do it since I use already my 2811 as Concentrator VPN for Clients_vpn.

    Y at - it a trick?

    Thank you very much

    Riccardo

    Of course, here is an example of configuration of a router to be configured to stop static VPN LAN-to-LAN as customer VPN at the same time:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a00809c7171.shtml

    And another one for the router be configured to terminate dynamic LAN - to - LAN VPN as VPN Client:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801dddbb.shtml

    Another example of setting right on the LAN-to-LAN VPN between 2 routers:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/routers/ps221/products_configuration_example09186a008073e078.shtml

    Hope that helps.

  • concentrator 3000 2 lan lan VPN with NAT

    I need to configure a vpn lan-2lan between 2 3030 concentrators (separate companies) on the Internet. My company assigns a small subnet for hosts sitting on the client network. The customer wants to use their own IP subnet and assign IP addresses within their range. So, they do static NAT on their hub. Is this possible? Or have they NAT s pc before arriving to the hub? Any help much appreciated.

    Hello

    Concentrator VPN supports the NAT.

    http://Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00801ae24c.shtml

    HTH

    Kind regards

    GE.

  • Duplicate remote Lan VPN subnets

    Hello Experts,

    I have 2 lans DISTANCE double connection via VPN with the ip address of 192.168.70.X and 192.168.70.x

    We are already working, but I don't know how to add the second that is listed

    exactly the same thing. Not clear how to apply the NAT on my Local router for the second subnet duplicate.

    I found this article but he speaks of lans in double on both sides, and it does NOT

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800b07ed.shtml

    Is there something similar, but with 2 LAN REMOTE subnets?

    Thank you

    Randall

    Hi, Randall

    As far as I know, you will have to do it on the remote end. The problem is that if you have the same address for example 192.168.1.70 arriving from two sites on the same time on your side VPN device will get very confused as to where the return traffic should pass.

    You can NAT IP source on your local router to a set of addresses 192.168.70.x addresses, but I still think that the VPN device would not be able to determine what tunnel to send traffic down on the way back.

    I appreciate it is not always easy to get the 3rd party to do something, but I think that that's your only choice.

    HTH

    Jon

  • LAN-to-LAN VPN

    Hello

    I currently have a configuration of the PIX to the SiteA and SiteB 1720 router. There is a LAN-to-LAN tunnel between the 2 sites. I had to install a second tunnel to SiteB ending on the 1720 router, so it will be possible to configure tunnels SiteA has also access to the client VPN tunnel?

    I would also like to have VPN tunnels that end at the PIX (SiteA) are also accessible from SiteB.

    It would be just a case of the crypto ACL configuration s for traffic?

    Thank you

    Take a look at the following link will be very useful

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807f9a89.shtml

    Good luck

    If useful rates

  • LAN to lan vpn between ASA and router 7200

    Hi friends,

    I need to configure the lan to lan between ASA vpn (remote location) and router 7200 (on our network).

    <7200 router="" (ip="" add:="" 10.10.5.2)="">-(Internet) -<(IP add:="" 192.168.12.2)="" asa(5510)="">---192.135.5.0/24 network

    I will have the following configuration:

    7200 router:

    crypto ISAKMP policy 80

    the enc

    AUTH pre-shared

    Group 1

    life 3600

    ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 192.168.12.2

    Cryto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtrans

    map VPNTunnel 80 ipsec-isakmp crypto

    defined by peer 192.168.12.2

    game of transformation-VPNtrans

    match address 110

    int fa0/0

    IP add 10.10.5.2 255.255.255.192

    IP virtual-reassembly

    no ip route cache

    Speed 100

    full duplex

    card crypto VPNTunnel

    access-list 110 permit ip any 192.135.5.0 0.0.0.255

    ASA:

    int e0/0

    nameif inside

    security-level 100

    192.135.5.254 Add IP 255.255.255.0

    int e0/1

    nameif outside

    security-level 0

    IP add 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.240

    access-list ACL extended ip 192.135.5.0 allow 255.255.255.0 any

    Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0 192.168.12.3 1

    "pre-shared key auth" ISAKMP policy 10

    ISAKMP policy 10-enc

    ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

    10 1 ISAKMP policy group

    ISAKMP duration strategy of life 10-3600

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtran

    card crypto VPN 10 matches the ACL address

    card crypto VPN 10 set peer 10.10.5.2

    card crypto VPN 10 the transform-set VPNtran value

    tunnel-group 10.10.5.2 type ipsec-l2l

    IPSec-attributes of type tunnel-group 10.10.5.2

    cisco123 pre-shared key

    card crypto VPN outside interface

    ISAKMP allows outside

    dhcpd address 192.135.5.1 - 192.135.5.250 inside

    dhcpd dns 172.15.4.5 172.15.4.6

    dhcpd wins 172.15.76.5 172.15.74.5

    dhcpd lease 14400

    dhcpd ping_timeout 500

    dhcpd allow inside

    Please check the configuration, please correct me if I missed something. I'm in a critical situation at the moment...

    Please advise...

    Thank you very much...

    Where it fails at the present time?

    Can you share out of after trying to establish the VPN tunnel:

    See the isa scream his

    See the ipsec scream his

    Please also run the following debug to see where it is a failure:

    debugging cry isa

    debugging ipsec cry

  • LAN-to-LAN VPN and ISAKMP Keep-alives

    Hello

    We have configured a VPN LAN-to-LAN between ASA 5505 and GNAT box. Looks like that GNat does not support persistent:

    January 16, 2007 14:50:22 713122 IP = 210.X.Y.Z, Keep-alives configured on, but the peer does not support persistent (type = None)

    Can I disable these KeepAlive on ASA as well?

    Thank you.

    Kind regards

    Alex

    Hi Alex,

    If the VPN is not affected hereby, you should not be disabled.

    Please rate if this helped.

    Kind regards

    Daniel

  • LAN to Lan VPN on ASA - than a single public address...

    Hello, I need to find a way to work around this problem.

    We have an ASA 5510 8.3, we need to use to terminate a VPN IPSEC in LAN to LAN running.

    Problem is that we have only a single public address available for having set up the link between the ASA and the Internet router on private addresses.

    Is it possible to NAT the public facing the inside or to the outside interface of the ASA and terminate the VPN on this interface?

    If this isn't the case, I have other options?

    Thanks in advance!

    Rob

    No, you can't NAT, the IP address of the ASA on the SAA itself, which is not supported.

    You can also terminate the VPN tunnel through the interface on the ASA.

    How and where you currently do NAT for internet access? You cannot configure NAT on the same device where you are currently configuring your NAT?

  • 3925, IPsec LAN - LAN VPN tunnel command unavailable

    Hello

    I am looking to use one of my 3925 to create a VPN IPsec LAN - LAN tunnel with another site.

    I was under the impression that I needed to get a license of securityk9 installed and then I was good to go.   I got a temporary license for 60 days and it is installed, but none of the commands I need to create the tunnel are appearing for me.

    I am using the command "crypto isakmp", but which does not appear:

    Router (config) #crypto?
    CA Certification Authority
    main activities key long-term
    public key PKI components

    Here's my license to show:

    Function index 2: securityk9
    Time left: 633 weeks 4 days
    Period of opportunity: 0 minute 0 second
    License type: assessment
    The license status: active, don't use, EULA accepted
    Number of licenses: not counted
    License priority: bass

    Don't know why there are so many weeks left

    Thoughts on that?

    Thanks in advance.

    just a little thing

    have you tried in config guest... . License to start and so on.

    as you said the router to use the license that you have installed.

    If you are a license sh what do you get?

    Good luck

    HTH

  • 3030 router Cisco LAN to LAN VPN, can only mount router tunnel

    I am unable to raise atunnel from inside my VPN concentrator 3030 (IOS 3.5.2) tunnel 3 uses Ethernet as the side private tunnel. Is there some kind of problem on the VPN 3030 internally that does not use the Ethernet IP source 3? Once triggered on the remote side, the tunnel passes and receives traffic and I can ping devices on the remote side of my private network, but I can't ping any remote device from inside the VPN 3030.

    Do you mean that you can now view the tunnel of something related to the 10.255.0.0/24 network, but no ping comes from the VPN3030 itself?

    When you ping the VPN3030 it will automatically use the private IP address I think. Debugging isn't warning us whatever it is the first that you attached is where the Diffie-Hellman group was incompatible. If you have passed Phase 1 but, you will see a debug on the router that is similar to the following message:

    * 26 Nov 08:51:37.901: IPSEC (validate_proposal_request): part #1 of the proposal

    (Eng. msg key.) Local INCOMING = 204.74.161.161, distance = 216.34.168.148,.

    local_proxy = 10.1.215.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 (type = 4),

    remote_proxy = 10.255.0.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 (type = 4),

    Protocol = ESP, transform = esp-3des esp-md5-hmac,

    lifedur = 0 and 0kb in

    SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0 x 4

    Here you can see that the remote_proxy is 10.255.0.0, which shows that the 3030 uses this network as the source subnet. If you try and ping from the 3030 again run debugging, you will probably see the 172.16.0.0 (the private interface) as the remote_proxy.

    Why is it important that you cannot bring up the tunnel within the 3030 anyway? When would you like to do this?

  • ASA Headend ASA5505 end distance customer LAN VPN

    Hi guys,.

    I wonder if you can point me in the right direction. We have a requirement of the company to print labels under our frame main as400 via some of our partner sites. Here is small enough partners who generally seem to have a connection standard high-speed router connected. Their COMPUTER knowledge is limited and we are looking to implement some sort of plug play solution in the current infrastructure. So what we would like is install ASA directly on their local network that has internet access, but no public IP address assigned and effectively create a VPN tunnel to our ASA at HQ. I have a seal a quick drawing can you confirm if this is possible and the best way to achieve?

    Yep, it's possible.  You can configure the 5505 to use ezvpn (vpnclient).  Configure the group policy to tunnel all traffic.

    http://www.jump.NET.uk/blog-Cisco-easy-VPN-on-ASA

Maybe you are looking for