match set

Hi, I have a Photosmart Premium Fax c309a connected to my Mac running Yosemite 10.10, I try to print a greeting card Hallmark, that I did it, paper size changed to A5, which is what I want, I always put book match, I tried everything I see on the forums for correspondence paper nothing seems to work tried all types of paper as well.

apprecieate any help, I can get this site.

Hello lafite.

Welcome to the HP Forums.

I see that you have a problem with a time lag of paper.

Please click on the following link which solves a 'paper Mismatch,' or 'Paper Size Mismatch"Error Message displays when printing

If troubleshooting doesn't help not solve your problem, then I would say call the HP Technical Support to see all the other possibilities for you. If you call in North America, the number is 1-800-474-6836 and for all other regions, please click here: click here.

Thanks for your time.

See you soon,.

Tags: HP Printers

Similar Questions

  • Is it really important if you buy only one sticks or matched sets?

    Hi all

    The school of thought in pairs purchases is that because they are paired, they will run better together. So say you buy 2 matched sets of 2 GB (2x2gb + 2x2gb) DDR2 or (3x2Go + 3x2gb) DDR3 memory, put you on the table and forget the sticks are matched and put randomly into the slots. Otherwise, we're going badly, and you replace the single stick instead of the pair.

    How is this any better than buying simple sticks of 2 GB?

    The system will perform or unstable?

    Personally, I think that pairs are tested together and are more marketing than anything else and the chance that simple sticks of RAM with the same characteristics do not work together is very thin voice against zero.

    Pairs only means that these clubs were from the same production batch and can be occasionally tested. There is no guarantee that they will perform better than the different production lots sticks. But the chance that different production batches differ more than sticks of a lot is also greater. Another consideration is that duo/sort or even hexagonal packs are generally less expensive than individual sticks stick. So, why take the chance to use compensation and individual sticks more than with or sorting packs or hexagonal. It is also respectful correct buying environment or sort packs or hexagonal due to the lesser burden of packaging on our environment stuff.

  • The upgrade and the addition of material

    Hello

    This is my situation, I'm in music production, and I need to upgrade my PC to fit my needs. I'm looking to upgrade memory and RAM as well as the addition of firewire ports. The firewire port is very important because I need to connect an audio interface I. I know that I can get all these components, it is clear the fact that I don't know what is compatible and it would be better for me.

    I know I should be able to get the 16 GB of RAM, which would be much more than the 6 GB it holds. I only NEED 1 firewire port, but having 2 would be nice.

    I don't have a lot of money to update everything, so I'm trying to get what I need, and then I can save the rest.

    HP-Pavilion p6716f

    Windows 7 Home Premium

    64-bit operating system

    I have not upgraded the PC anyway, it is still stock.

    Thanks in advance for your help.

    You are welcome.  Thank you for the additional information.

    When upgrading memory, you must always match the memory that is already installed.  Otherwise, the new memory may not be compatible.  The motherboard of your computer is the Architecture Dual-Channel.  Therefore, it is better to install matched sets.  This is the memory that is recommended by Crucial.  They make very good memory.  In fact, HP uses their memory in a large number of their computers.

    This is a Firewire card that should work for you.  It has 3 external ports; (400 Mbps)-a 1394 and 1394b (800 Mbps).  If you decide not to buy this card, it is a good example of what you need.  You can watch other on Newegg to see what else is available.

    Please click "Thumbs Up" if I helped you and click on "Accept as Solution" If your problem is resolved.

  • How to change the Description of the c# step programmatically

    Based on user selections in my DLL I want to change the Description of step TestStand.  I use c# 2008 and TestStand 4.1.  I am able to read the Description by using Step.GetDescriptionEx, but I can't find a matching 'Set' command.

    It is a step in editing.  With the help of PropertyObjectFile.IncChangeCount () works fine.

  • Bistre using Photosmart Premium AIO

    When I print on my HP C309 Photosmart Premium new all-in-one using iPhoto ' 09 running Mac OS 10.6.2 (Snow Leopard), the prints look as I applied sepia effect. In other words, my black and white photos have a light yellow background pink or clear. I even choose black and white effect in iPhoto, but the looks still print sepia.

    I tried printing the same picture on my HP6840 deskjet and the black color is perfect - no sepia aspect.

    Thank you.

    MichaelT

    HP inks and papers are a matched set.  Use of inks not HP or papers is, well, kind of a crap shoot.  This may work, it may not.

    I recommend the HP Premium Plus photo paper.

  • p6616f

    The p6616f running Win 7 SP1 Home Premimum will support 16 GB of memory.  I have made several attempts to upgrade, and I am not successful.  When I put 2 (4 GB) sticks the computer goes to the BIOS but then want to recover Windows.  When I add the 3rd 4 GB stick, the screen no longer works.  The monitor has a light yellow as if it gets no signal.

    Everything I read says it should work.  Thoughts?

    The RAM sticks must be specific for your system.  They must also be matched sets.

  • incompatibility 364XL cartridge.

    Is it true that the 364XL cartridge does not enter a printer B110? Key pod at the rear plastic does not match setting up one, or one provided in a combo pack.

    Can I get around this by cutting the leg?

    Thanks for the reply. I also found another forum, where it was confirmed that two of the cartridge versions here. Amazon has been quick to replenish the correct.

    KennyB3 wrote:

    gatehill,

    I know it has been awhile.  All made turn ok?  We can click here and visit HP sure supply select the region and search by printer or cartridge to make sure that we find a compatible cartridge.

  • VPN on ASA-5510 with Configure a dynamic encryption card

    Hi all

    My name is ping, I have ASA-5510 for site to site VPN configuration, but am not clear with a few conifguration on ASA-5510 series, not sure on poin than, when I install on other sets of cisco router I can use

    ASA2 (config) #crypto card outside-card 10 ipsec-isakmp

    % NOTE: this new map encryption will remain disabled until a peer

    and a valid access list have been configured.

    ........

    but, when I configure ASA 5510 it as below:

    mtelcoASA2 (config) # crypto?

    set up the mode commands/options:

    CA Certification Authority

    dynamic-map set up a dynamic encryption card

    IPSec transform-set set, life of the IPSec Security Association and fragmentation

    ISAKMP configure ISAKMP

    main activities key long-term

    card to configure an encryption card

    ASA2 (config) # map outside-map 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto ?

    set up the mode commands/options:

    Entry dynamic is a dynamic map

    "Set up a dynamic crypto map" which uses for and why I can't use only "map outside-map 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto" and if not can't, can I skip this command or tell me the other way with explanation with nicely,

    Thank you very much

    hot topic,

    Ping,

    Just use crypto card outside-map 10 match/set without ipsec-isakmp key word and it will be fine.

  • How can I increase the RAM (memory) for my computer to hp dc5750?

    I bought one of these pc hp dc5750 form small factor that invade now right-handed ebay.  It came with only 1gig memory 80gig hardrive and processor bicoeur AMD Athlon 64 x 2 2.0GH but I can not know the socket type I think it's an am2?  I'll update my AMD Athlon II X 2 215 2700 MHz proc @ in my hp p6203w, but it is an am3 I think and I was wondering if the motherboard will accept an am3 as my another hp witch will take either.   I had also (lots of memory Samsung - 2GB (2x1GB) PC2 - 5300U - 555 RAM NON - ECC Unbuffered 240-pin) off ebay thinking they were a matched set, but when I got them one had a 1R - 8 x and the other had a part number x 8 - 2R

    I was woundering if I ran these two stick and the two 512 original supplied with the pc that are 1R - x 8 a face cards will be it atcually be able to use all 3 concerts cuase I saw a diagram that shows the configuration of two 1gigs and 2 512 in slot 2 and 3.   but he said someithing on all correspondence.  Once I put them all in the computer it says there 3gigs but I don't know if it of using everything or if Im better off just runing the two 1gig sticks or both will have to be 1R - x 8 or 2R - x 8 (it is the motherboard that has all the right to side by side 4 memory slots and not in separated couples and the other model nuber 8305-65U)

    Oh yeh Im runing win7 64 bit

    Type of socket original title: hp dc5750 and memory?

    + 1 on the suggestion of Nirmal - contact HP support, but--

    All very hit and Miss. Miss Aries matching is not a good idea and miss-corresponding to the quantity (2x512MB - 2 x 1 GB) often fails. You can get lucky and the machine will start, but the RAM performance will suffer without worrying.
    There only seems to be a lot of people who are able to run the 3 GB of RAM (laptops for most), but it's a strange configuration.
    Better to have two sticks of 2 GB and (assuming that Win7 32-bit) only have access to about 3.25 GB of that you still get the benefit of the dual channel performance.
    I have an old (built in ' 05) PC with an AMD 939 socket cpu and experimented with two 512 MB and two sticks of 1 GB (I have 2x512MB sticks all the time), the computer does not start in windows with this configuration.

    AMD made a number of processors with the Athlon 64 x 2 designation. Several are socket 939, others may be AM2. He must know exactly what processor and the motherboard to know what are the components.
    If the RAM is DDR2, there is a chance of the cpu/motherboard are AM2.

    The upgrade to a HP or other OEM PC can be a minefield that they often use a design of the 'special' motherboard (if you use the HP chipset drivers this is probably one of their 'special'), and with 1 GB of RAM and only a 80 GB HDD in a matter of form factor small with a cheap food you get what you pay for.
    Personally - you better made to buy the parts from someone like new egg (if you are in the USA) and assembled the unit yourself. Basically, you try to make a silk on a scholarship...)

    EDIT: Just found this -.
    http://www.crucial.com/upgrade/HP+-+Compaq-memory/HP+business+desktops/dc5750+series+%28All+form+factors%29-upgrades.html

  • ETL Sample Application Integrator deployment error

    Hi friends,

    I try to install EID31_SamplePipeline app EID to OTN homepage.

    I use Integrator ETL 3.1.1 in windows 2008

    problem is I'm trying to import data by running baseline.grf in Integrator ETL I get some exceptions such as

    org.jetel.exception.BadDataFormatException: DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey (date) cannot be set to "01/06/2008 0:00 '-don't match set the format" MM/dd/yyyy hh: mm "file 336, box 2 ("DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey"), metadata"DimDate; value: ' 01/06/2008 0:00 '

    Now is due to the recording of inaccurate data in the .csv files? Well, I checked excel file record 336/337, and I have found no problem there.

    What I have to install MS Office in my server?

    Help, please.

    Kind regards.

    Detail error log is fixed:-

    INFO  [WatchDog_0] - ---------------------------------** End of Log **--------------------------------
    ERROR [WatchDog_541] - Component [Date Dim:DATA_READER1] finished with status ERROR.
    DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey (date) cannot be set to "6/1/2008 0:00" - doesn't match defined format "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm" in record 336, field 2 ("DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey"), metadata "DimDate"; value: '6/1/2008 0:00'
      Unparseable date: "6/1/2008 0:00" at position 13
    ERROR [WatchDog_541] - Error details:
    org.jetel.exception.JetelRuntimeException: Component [Date Dim:DATA_READER1] finished with status ERROR.
        at org.jetel.graph.Node.createNodeException(Node.java:535)
        at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:514)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
    Caused by: org.jetel.exception.BadDataFormatException: DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey (date) cannot be set to "6/1/2008 0:00" - doesn't match defined format "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm" in record 336, field 2 ("DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey"), metadata "DimDate"; value: '6/1/2008 0:00'
        at org.jetel.data.DateDataField.fromString(DateDataField.java:313)
        at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.populateField(DataParser.java:712)
        at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.parseNext(DataParser.java:560)
        at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.getNext(DataParser.java:184)
        at org.jetel.util.MultiFileReader.getNext(MultiFileReader.java:432)
        at org.jetel.component.DataReader.execute(DataReader.java:268)
        at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:485)
        ... 1 more
    Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unparseable date: "6/1/2008 0:00" at position 13
        at org.jetel.util.formatter.JavaDateFormatter.parseDate(JavaDateFormatter.java:75)
        at org.jetel.util.formatter.JavaDateFormatter.parseMillis(JavaDateFormatter.java:82)
        at org.jetel.data.DateDataField.fromString(DateDataField.java:308)
        ... 7 more
    
    INFO  [exNode_541_1307392988263_ENDECA_BULK_ADD_OR_REPLACE_RECORDS0] - Aborting run due to a signal from the user
    INFO  [WatchDog_541] - Execution of phase [0] finished with error - elapsed time(sec): 2
    ERROR [WatchDog_541] - !!! Phase finished with error - stopping graph run !!!
    INFO  [WatchDog_541] - -----------------------** Summary of Phases execution **---------------------
    INFO  [WatchDog_541] - Phase#            Finished Status         RunTime(sec)    MemoryAllocation(KB)
    INFO  [WatchDog_541] - 0                 ERROR                              2             81647
    INFO  [WatchDog_541] - ------------------------------** End of Summary **---------------------------
    INFO  [WatchDog_541] - WatchDog thread finished - total execution time: 2 (sec)
    ERROR [WatchDog_0] - Component [Run Steps:RUN_GRAPH1] finished with status ERROR.
    Execution of graph './graph/LoadData.grf' failed!
      Component [Date Dim:DATA_READER1] finished with status ERROR.
       DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey (date) cannot be set to "6/1/2008 0:00" - doesn't match defined format "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm" in record 336, field 2 ("DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey"), metadata "DimDate"; value: '6/1/2008 0:00'
        Unparseable date: "6/1/2008 0:00" at position 13
      Inner exception: org.jetel.exception.JetelRuntimeException: Component [Date Dim:DATA_READER1] finished with status ERROR.
          at org.jetel.graph.Node.createNodeException(Node.java:535)
          at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:514)
          at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
      Caused by: org.jetel.exception.BadDataFormatException: DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey (date) cannot be set to "6/1/2008 0:00" - doesn't match defined format "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm" in record 336, field 2 ("DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey"), metadata "DimDate"; value: '6/1/2008 0:00'
          at org.jetel.data.DateDataField.fromString(DateDataField.java:313)
          at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.populateField(DataParser.java:712)
          at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.parseNext(DataParser.java:560)
          at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.getNext(DataParser.java:184)
          at org.jetel.util.MultiFileReader.getNext(MultiFileReader.java:432)
          at org.jetel.component.DataReader.execute(DataReader.java:268)
          at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:485)
          ... 1 more
      Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unparseable date: "6/1/2008 0:00" at position 13
          at org.jetel.util.formatter.JavaDateFormatter.parseDate(JavaDateFormatter.java:75)
          at org.jetel.util.formatter.JavaDateFormatter.parseMillis(JavaDateFormatter.java:82)
          at org.jetel.data.DateDataField.fromString(DateDataField.java:308)
          ... 7 more
    
    ERROR [WatchDog_0] - Error details:
    org.jetel.exception.JetelRuntimeException: Component [Run Steps:RUN_GRAPH1] finished with status ERROR.
        at org.jetel.graph.Node.createNodeException(Node.java:535)
        at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:514)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
    Caused by: org.jetel.exception.JetelRuntimeException: Execution of graph './graph/LoadData.grf' failed!
        at org.jetel.component.RunGraph.logError(RunGraph.java:538)
        at org.jetel.component.RunGraph.runGraphThisInstance(RunGraph.java:517)
        at org.jetel.component.RunGraph.runSingleGraph(RunGraph.java:397)
        at org.jetel.component.RunGraph.execute(RunGraph.java:303)
        at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:485)
        ... 1 more
    Caused by: org.jetel.exception.JetelRuntimeException: Component [Date Dim:DATA_READER1] finished with status ERROR.
    DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey (date) cannot be set to "6/1/2008 0:00" - doesn't match defined format "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm" in record 336, field 2 ("DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey"), metadata "DimDate"; value: '6/1/2008 0:00'
      Unparseable date: "6/1/2008 0:00" at position 13
    Inner exception: org.jetel.exception.JetelRuntimeException: Component [Date Dim:DATA_READER1] finished with status ERROR.
        at org.jetel.graph.Node.createNodeException(Node.java:535)
        at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:514)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
    Caused by: org.jetel.exception.BadDataFormatException: DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey (date) cannot be set to "6/1/2008 0:00" - doesn't match defined format "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm" in record 336, field 2 ("DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey"), metadata "DimDate"; value: '6/1/2008 0:00'
        at org.jetel.data.DateDataField.fromString(DateDataField.java:313)
        at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.populateField(DataParser.java:712)
        at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.parseNext(DataParser.java:560)
        at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.getNext(DataParser.java:184)
        at org.jetel.util.MultiFileReader.getNext(MultiFileReader.java:432)
        at org.jetel.component.DataReader.execute(DataReader.java:268)
        at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:485)
        ... 1 more
    Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unparseable date: "6/1/2008 0:00" at position 13
        at org.jetel.util.formatter.JavaDateFormatter.parseDate(JavaDateFormatter.java:75)
        at org.jetel.util.formatter.JavaDateFormatter.parseMillis(JavaDateFormatter.java:82)
        at org.jetel.data.DateDataField.fromString(DateDataField.java:308)
        ... 7 more
    
        at org.jetel.component.RunGraph.assembleException(RunGraph.java:533)
        ... 5 more
    
    INFO  [WatchDog_0] - Execution of phase [0] finished with error - elapsed time(sec): 55
    ERROR [WatchDog_0] - !!! Phase finished with error - stopping graph run !!!
    INFO  [WatchDog_0] - -----------------------** Summary of Phases execution **---------------------
    INFO  [WatchDog_0] - Phase#            Finished Status         RunTime(sec)    MemoryAllocation(KB)
    INFO  [WatchDog_0] - 0                 ERROR                             55             98782
    INFO  [WatchDog_0] - ------------------------------** End of Summary **---------------------------
    INFO  [WatchDog_0] - WatchDog thread finished - total execution time: 55 (sec)
    INFO  [main] - Freeing graph resources.
    ERROR [main] -
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Error details ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Component [Run Steps:RUN_GRAPH1] finished with status ERROR.
       Execution of graph './graph/LoadData.grf' failed!
        Component [Date Dim:DATA_READER1] finished with status ERROR.
         DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey (date) cannot be set to "6/1/2008 0:00" - doesn't match defined format "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm" in record 336, field 2 ("DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey"), metadata "DimDate"; value: '6/1/2008 0:00'
          Unparseable date: "6/1/2008 0:00" at position 13
        Inner exception: org.jetel.exception.JetelRuntimeException: Component [Date Dim:DATA_READER1] finished with status ERROR.
            at org.jetel.graph.Node.createNodeException(Node.java:535)
            at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:514)
            at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
        Caused by: org.jetel.exception.BadDataFormatException: DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey (date) cannot be set to "6/1/2008 0:00" - doesn't match defined format "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm" in record 336, field 2 ("DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey"), metadata "DimDate"; value: '6/1/2008 0:00'
            at org.jetel.data.DateDataField.fromString(DateDataField.java:313)
            at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.populateField(DataParser.java:712)
            at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.parseNext(DataParser.java:560)
            at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.getNext(DataParser.java:184)
            at org.jetel.util.MultiFileReader.getNext(MultiFileReader.java:432)
            at org.jetel.component.DataReader.execute(DataReader.java:268)
            at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:485)
            ... 1 more
        Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unparseable date: "6/1/2008 0:00" at position 13
            at org.jetel.util.formatter.JavaDateFormatter.parseDate(JavaDateFormatter.java:75)
            at org.jetel.util.formatter.JavaDateFormatter.parseMillis(JavaDateFormatter.java:82)
            at org.jetel.data.DateDataField.fromString(DateDataField.java:308)
            ... 7 more
       Component [Date Dim:DATA_READER1] finished with status ERROR.
        DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey (date) cannot be set to "6/1/2008 0:00" - doesn't match defined format "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm" in record 336, field 2 ("DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey"), metadata "DimDate"; value: '6/1/2008 0:00'
         Unparseable date: "6/1/2008 0:00" at position 13
       Inner exception: org.jetel.exception.JetelRuntimeException: Component [Date Dim:DATA_READER1] finished with status ERROR.
           at org.jetel.graph.Node.createNodeException(Node.java:535)
           at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:514)
           at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
       Caused by: org.jetel.exception.BadDataFormatException: DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey (date) cannot be set to "6/1/2008 0:00" - doesn't match defined format "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm" in record 336, field 2 ("DimDate_FullDateAlternateKey"), metadata "DimDate"; value: '6/1/2008 0:00'
           at org.jetel.data.DateDataField.fromString(DateDataField.java:313)
           at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.populateField(DataParser.java:712)
           at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.parseNext(DataParser.java:560)
           at org.jetel.data.parser.DataParser.getNext(DataParser.java:184)
           at org.jetel.util.MultiFileReader.getNext(MultiFileReader.java:432)
           at org.jetel.component.DataReader.execute(DataReader.java:268)
           at org.jetel.graph.Node.run(Node.java:485)
           ... 1 more
       Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unparseable date: "6/1/2008 0:00" at position 13
           at org.jetel.util.formatter.JavaDateFormatter.parseDate(JavaDateFormatter.java:75)
           at org.jetel.util.formatter.JavaDateFormatter.parseMillis(JavaDateFormatter.java:82)
           at org.jetel.data.DateDataField.fromString(DateDataField.java:308)
           ... 7 more
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ERROR [main] - Execution of graph failed !
    
    
    

    What time zone are you and what is the time zone of the default local on the computer where you run Integrator.  You can't be in Pakistan would you?

    There was no midnight (0:00) June 1, 2008 in Pakistan, because of a change to Daylight Savings Time (DST), UTC + 5 to UTC + 6.  Thus, clocks has moved to May 31, 2008 23:59 on June 1, 2008 01:00, making midnight and time following it an invalid time value.  So if your TZ is Pakistan which could explain the error you see.

    You can change the value outside this time, or use a different TZ.

  • CQ61-319WM and AC twin memory RAM speed

    I bought the CQ61-319WM with / 3 GB or RAM.  The provided configuration is a badly matched set of a 1 GB SODIMM (A-Data) and a 2 GB SODIMM (Samsung).  According to CPU - Z 1.54, both pieces is 400 MHz (DDR2 - 800 MHz), latency CASE 6-6-6-18-24 and according to Memtest86 + 4.00, the result is speed of the RAM of 3481 MB/s using 64-bit transfers (single channel access).

    Upgrading to a configuration usually total memory dual channel results in a good Speed up, I decided to replace the 1 GB SODIMM with another 2 GB.

    I had a piece of 2 GB to another previous project, but it was a version special high speed with latency CASE of 5-5-5-18-23.  I decided that a pair of them so completely taken over would be the best that I could reach, so I bought a second piece (about 80 $ CAN) and put them in.  I've also upgraded the BIOS F.13 (and my Memtest86 + 4.10).

    The result is better, but not as good as it could be.  Reports of CPU - Z full CASE 5-5-5-18 is used and I think it's saying that the dual channel is active (or he's saying that the RAM can support double channel - I am not sure).

    Memtest 86 + (4.00 and 4.10 versions) indicate that the CASE has indeed changed to 5-5-5-18, but that access is still 64-bit (single channel) and the speed of RAM increased to 3614 MB/s.

    3614 MB/s is faster than 3481 MB/s, it is not as fast as I expect 5-5-5-18-23 memory to be if it is currently running dual channel (128-bit access).

    I believe that the BIOS has probably decided to stay "single channel" because the RAM is in a configuration that was unexpected (because the latency CASE is too fast).  However, this probably means that if I buy another piece of 'standard' 800 MHz DDR2 (CASE 6-6-6-18-24) and install it with the original Samsung RAM, it will probably run at full dual channel (128-bit).  Such a configuration should be faster than what I'm running now, despite the fact that the RAM by piece real speed is slower.

    Anyone used this RAM (2 x (2 GB, 800 MHz, CL6)) the installation program?  Can anyone confirm that the result is a configuration complete dual channel?  I can buy the RAM, but if she does not run dual channel, so it's just a waste of money.

    Note: It would certainly NOT let fall to the bottom as for two-channel to 667 MHz.  Such a decline would result in approximately 2600 MB/s even double channel speeds up access.

    I heard generally good.  Curiosity prevailed, and I bought one more piece of RAM.  This piece has been another 2 GB DDR2 800 MHz SODIMM, but this time with the same latency than the original equipment numbers (CASE 6-6-6-18-24).  I installed it with the original Samsung CQ61-319WM and speed of memory that result was exactly the same as the pair (CASE 5-5-5-18-23) faster RAM.  The computer has finished 3-pass of Memtest86 + 4.10 as the fastest pair of RAM, confirming also the speed.

    This tells me that the speed increase had nothing to do with issues of latency, and she had to come from the increase in speed of access memory (128-bit) 'Dual Channel '.

    As to why Memtest86 + 4.10 is reported as "single channel", I feel that the answer may have to do with the RAM 'Side Port' CQ61 graphics system.  According to published specifications, this computer has 128 MB GDDR2 (and memory).  It does not say how this memory is configured.  If it is the only channel (128-bit), then it could be that Memtest86 + sees.

    To confirm this, I took the pair of quick latency RAM and put it in another computer that uses an older AMD 690 chipsets, and the same pair of RAM ran in dual channel mode on the other computer, but at a lower speed of 667 MHz.  Therefore, it seems that AMD memory controllers have probably no problem with this pair of RAM running in dual channel in general.

    While nothing that I've done is quite conclusive, indicates that this computer was probably working with access memory dual channel for two configurations of 4 GB RAM I used.

    In any case, I'll leave the slower RAM in the computer because whenever I change my configuration of memory, I have to lose more than 3 hours running Memtest86 + to check it's OK.  If I did not need to get an acceleration, I will use the faster RAM later in something else.

    There might be a reason to use the best of the RAM (which is probably more recent technology and probably using a little less power), but I don't want to spend more time on this issue.

  • Search for PES 10 files? Do not sort results

    I want to search for, BIG in all file names so I can remove them from the catalog.  When I search for the only indication I get is the symbol of not, circle with a line.  The thumbnails are not sorted.  Accept the thumbnails are displayed with no circle, and are not sorted.  What I am doing wrong?

    Hello

    I'm sure that you are getting a little frustrated with this problem now.

    I am running on a Windows 7 64 bit and I have Premiere Elements too, so in theory, our systems should work the same.

    The way you view works, it's what I expected, that if I was looking on two tags and had the option Show closely Matching sets for research (preferences - general) checked. If this is checked then turn it off, close the elements, open it again, and try the search. I don't think that it really makes a difference to your search.

    I think it will eliminate a problem of catalog by creating a new catalog. Try this:

    (1) open the Organizer

    2) go to file-> catalogue

    3) click on the new button

    (4) enter a name like Test cat and click OK

    (5) click on Open - this will create an empty catalog

    (6) go to file-> Get Photos and videos-> of files and folders

    Navigate 7) to a folder example - for the test, you don't need really all your photos

    8) click Get Media

    OK now, try a file name search to see if you get different results.

    Good luck

    Brian

  • Update in SQL

    Hi all

    I have a table table1, contains data for the last 3 quarters.
    There act_nbr, neighborhood, p_date as columns.
    Act_nbr is the primary key and quarter a 201003,201006,201009 values.
    p_date is the date of the perfect doc.

    I have changed the table1, added 2 new columns p_date_max, p_date_min.

    update the table table1: for p_date = 201006,.

    I wrote

    setting a day of table1 set p_date_max = (select max (p_date) from table1
    where p_date in (201003,201006)
    and a.act_nbr = b.act_nbr)
    where a.p_date = 201006;

    his is a long time to run, then I took an act_nbr and tested the result and it seems as expected but I need optimize the query.

    Is there a better way of writing, the update?

    Thank you

    Try using the fusion

    Merge into table1 a
    using
    (
         select max(p_date) as max_dt, act_nbr
         from table1
         where p_date in (201003,201006)
         group by act_nbr
    )b
    on ( a.act_nbr=b.act_nbr and a.p_date = 201006)
    when matched set a.p_date_max = b.max_dt 
    

    Thank you...

  • Contemporary PSE8, seek a multiple tag AND OR

    I'm trying to understand what logic using the tag of multiple searches. Just when I think that I found it I find something different.

    For example, the categories of people and places behave differently.  By selecting multiple tags within the people of the same class behaves like a Boolean and multiple labels in the category places act as a RC. By selecting a subcategory in the category of people will select all keywords in the subcategory and perform a RC. Choose a subcategory as an exclusion will only exclude the subcategory as a keyword. It does nothing with the keywords in the subcategory.

    I have not done to test other possibilities existing with the other categories, such as; Events, other, animals.

    I guess my question is; Where the full description of Adobe on how it works?

    My request would be to have the opportunity to build a more advanced Boolean expression. Maybe in a manual mode by typing in a string of Boolean.

    Thank you, - phil

    In general, Adobe has made a complete mess of research within the PES - poor design and implementation riddled with bugs.

    In general, however, research works the same regardless of the category to which you are working with.

    Several tags in the places category act as a RC.

    Search the category of Places works in the same way that others - by default, get you a Boolean and.  Most likely, the option Edit > preferences > General > show closely matching sets for research is verified, and in addition to the exact correspondence of the results, the Organizer shows closing-match results (i.e. Boolean GOLD).  Closing-match miniature results have a circle-blue-Plaid-white on the upper right corner.   Turn off this option, and you will see just the exact matching results.

    By selecting a subcategory in the category of people will select all keywords in the subcategory and perform a RC.

    This is true for any subcatetgory in any category.

    Choose a subcategory as an exclusion will only exclude the subcategory as a keyword. It does nothing with the keywords in the subcategory.

    It is a bug.  In PSE 5 and earlier versions, but does not include a subcategory excludes all the contained keyword tags.  That continues to be the behavior documented in help, but he broke in PES 6 and Adobe did not bother to fix it.  See this FAQ for details and a workaround:

    http://www.johnrellis.com/psedbtool/Photoshop-elements-FAQ.htm#_Workarounds_for_exclude-pH otos - of

    Where the full description of Adobe on how it works?

    It does not exist.    See the User Guide for a partial written description, a lot of search mode is designed to work:

    http://help.Adobe.com/en_US/ElementsOrganizer/8.0/win/using/WSA80748D8-6425-4E03-BF71-2881 48599D76_WIN.html

    My request would be to have the opportunity to build a more advanced Boolean expression. Maybe in a manual mode by typing in a string of Boolean.

    PSE 7 and 8 have the text search box in the upper left corner, and it supports partial Boolean expressions:

    http://help.Adobe.com/en_US/ElementsOrganizer/8.0/win/using/WS3265F89A-20BA-47FD-81D5-9091 ABA3819D.html

    But it has design problems and is bug. Expressions in parentheses silently fail.  TAG: operator matches any tag containing the supplied string (no way to exact correspondence of tags).   Sometimes it incorrectly evaluates subexpressions with empty results.

  • Finally built my new i7 920 system!

    Hi all - particularly evil and JIm for their support and advice...

    I received the components for my new i7 920 system yesterday and built today.

    components:

    I7 920 D0 stepping

    PP power & cooling psu 910 watts

    ASUS P6T mb

    2 x (3x2g) games of matching ram DDR3 1333 to 12 GB

    2 x DVD rw drives

    1 x rw Blu - Ray player

    System 1 x 160 GB WD drive

    1 x 500 GB Seagate drive cache/storage

    work of 2 x 500 GB Seagate drives totaling 1 TB - raid 0

    So far so good - no problem!

    I was able to boot the new material from my old drive system that ran under a processor of 6000 AMD Athlon x 64 and a Biostar A770 A2 + MB. I just installed new drivers for Asus mb and things well seem so far. I have not tweaked anything in yet another bios then the date/time and boot device and order. Eventually, I'll install a new copy of Vista x 64 OS and CS4 on my new i7 system and rebuild a my NLE, but for now - I'm happy.

    I can't wait to see how much faster some rendering and transcoding Gets!

    I have attached a few screenshots from CPU - Z, so you can see some numbers. Notice that the ram type in the ' SPD/maximum bandwidth box' is listed as PC3-10700 and PC3 - 10700 H and not only 10600?

    In addition, in reason matched sets, slots 1/3/5 that all show the same timings Table frequency for that set and slots 2/4/6 show another frequency for this game.

    cpu.JPGmb.JPGmemory.JPGslot1-3-5.JPG

    slots2-4-6.JPG

    You said that you have defined your 172 BCLK. What did you do in the BIOS?

    Turvo V is only intended for small adjustments. If you do anything too drastic, the tension can get in the way of success.

    My best advice is to set the BCLK in BIOS to 172 and leave everything for the moment, put car other than the AI Overclock Tuner, which should be set to manual, otherwise you can not set the BCLK to a desired position. Monitor the temperatures while doing this!

Maybe you are looking for