Maximum non-traversal calls from VCS Cluster

Hi all

As mentioned in the CV data sheet, I know that a VCS can accommodate up to 500 calls from nontraversal.

But VCS cluster which consists of 6 VCS can treat 2,000, steps 3 000 (6 x 500).

I wonder how many calls each VCS cluster can handle.

Is this correct?

2 VCS cluster

=> Registratrions up to 5,000?

Up to 1,000 calls in nontraversal?

Up to 200 calls course?

VCS cluster 3

=> Registratrions to 7 500?

Up to 1,500 calls to nontraversal?

Up to 200 calls course?

4 VCS cluster

=> Registratrions up to 10,000?

Up to 2,000 calls in nontraversal?

Up to 300 calls course?

5 VCS cluster

=> Registratrions up to 10,000?

Up to 2,000 calls in nontraversal?

Up to 400 calls course?

6 VCS cluster

=> Up to 10 000 registratrions

Up to 2,000 calls from nontraversal

Up to 400 calls course

Best regards

Kotaro Hashimoto

Hi Kotaro,

even if the 6 servers are taken in charge by vcs cluster however only 4 will be active. So 4 * 500 is 2000 license.

https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-19215

check the above document.

Rgds

Alok

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

  • Courses and non-traversal calls

    Hello

    Can someone explain in simple terms what are courses and non-traversal calls?, what is the difference? And also the VCS control below must traversal licenses?

    CTI-VCS-CONTRL-K9

    Control of VCS

    Thanks in advance.

    If you have two endpoint C-series (i.e. CTS-SX20) both recorded on VCS control and also capable of reaching out directly between them (a routing), then in general the call will address as non-traversal call Endpoint, so no license courses will be necessary.

    However if these Endpoint calling each other, but using different protocol (i.e. an end point registered in VCS control only with H323 and other endpoint registered on the CV with SIP), or different IP version (that is to say one with IPv6 and other with IPv4 registration), then control VCS remain media routing in order to manage such scenario of interoperability which will require licensed traversal appeal.

  • Make use of crossing call instead of Non-traversal on Cisco VCS - C

    Hello

    I have a test of Cisco's VCS running non-traversal 20 and 100 license course. I need once I have start a session of Cisco's Jabber client to one of the cameras (Studios). I want the VCS to consume a license of traversal appeal?

    Is - this possibe?

    Hello

    If you enable interoperability and call Jabber on sip to H323 endpoint. <->SIP h323 will consume a crossing

    Lisence.

    / Magnus

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

  • Questions call non-Traversal

    Hi all

    I implement some new devices of telepresence:
    Site has
    VCS-control (X8.1)
    VCS-Expressway (X8.1)
    MCU 5310 (4.4)
    C40 codec (7.0.2)

    Site B
    (7.0.2) codec C20
    The site has different subnet

    I have enabled H.323 & SIP on the VCS - C and tested several calls between Site A & b. whenever calls go out H.323, SIP, or SIP to H.323 from the C40 for the C20 or vice versa, that there is no problem. Both sites receive video and audio.
    Whenever I force the same protocol. That is to say, H.323 to SIP for SIP or H.323 and making the same calls, the site B (C20) is not video of the Site (C40). However the C40 receives both video & audio of the C20. What is interesting, is that if I do the same calls of the MCU, which is also in Site A, then there is no problem. So the problem is between the C40 and C20.
    Since I'm not physcally on sites because I do this execution remotely, I can count only on the stats I get from the GUI. I have attached a photo taken of the customer from the screen of the C20.

    Calls:
    Calls crossing
    C40 - C20 H.323 - SIP - call ok
    C20 - C40 H.323 - SIP - call ok
    C40 - C20 SIP - H.323 - call ok
    C20 - C40 SIP - H.323 - call ok
    MCU - C20 H.323 - H.323 - call ok

    Non-Traversal calls
    C40 - C20 H.323 - H.323 - no video received the C20
    C40 - C20 SIP - SIP - no video received the C20
    C20 - C40 H.323 - H.323 - no video received the C20
    C20 - C40 SIP - SIP - no video received the C20

    This suggests that there is only a problem on the C20 in non-traversal calls. I don't want to use licensed traveled between these 2 points of termination.

    Thank you for your help. Any input would be greatly appreciated.

    -Greg

    When you make an H323, SIP call, all media is 'mandated' by the VCS, so they would still work even if they cannot ping each other.  When you do a non-traversal call, media flows directly between the endpoints.

    Ping a C-Series, connect to the codec via SSH (same credentials as the Web browser), and then type systemtools network ping 10.1.1.1

    Where "10.1.1.1" is the IP address of the remote end point.

  • Question of the use of non-traversal license

    Hello world! Wanted to ask a quick question. If endpoint makes a call to another endpoint (via WAN) and each of them is registered in VCS on their sides and then if it will use the non-traversal license of VCS or just one of them?

    Thank you

    Each call and the end point that enter or exit the VCs will have 1 license appeal.  What determines the type of license, either Non-traversal or crossing is less (confirmed by the help guide).

    Calls of traversal VCS: VCS standard video or audio calls, including business-to-business calls, B2BUA calls (for encryption of the media or ice) and interoperability or sent through gateway calls to third-party solutions where the VCS as well takes the call signaling and media of the call. Each call consumes a license of traversal appeal.

    VCS non-traversal calls: here's the VCS standard video or audio calls where the traffic goes through VCS, but the media passes directly between the endpoints, or between an endpoint and another system in the direction of the call. Each call consumes a license non-traversal call. Note that Lync B2BUA calls are classified as non-traversal is called (even if media cross the VCS).

  • License NON-Traversal VCS controls

    Hi all

    Our control of VCS have alarm (warning the number of concurrent calls to non-traversal capacity has approached the limit allowed.) and I want to know what kind of appeal to eat non-transversal license for me to understand and decide how many additional license we need. Vascular control VCS was 10 Non-traversal and 100 courses license. Please help me to check which license (crossing or Non-traversal) used and how lincenses required by call.

    1. VC (EX90) endpoint to endpoint VC (C60), recorded in the same control VCS

    2 Movi account/SIP-UA to Movi account/SIP-UA, recorded in the same control VCS

    3 VC endpoint to Movi account/SIP-UA, recorded in the same control VCS

    4 VC endpoint (EX90) endpoint VC (C60), recorded in different control VCS

    5 Movi account/SIP-UA to Movi account/SIP-UA, recorded at different control VCS

    6 VC point endpoint to Movi account/SIP-UA, recorded at different control VCS

    7 VC endpoint to MCU, recorded in the same control VCS

    8 Movi account/SIP-UA to MCU, recorded in the same control VCS

    9 VC point endpoint to MCU, recorded at different control VCS

    10 Movi account/SIP-UA to MCU, recorded in different control VCS

    11. point endpoints at the endpoint Public VC VC (go VCS Expressway)

    12 Movi account/SIP-UA Public VC endpoint (go VCS Expressway)

    NOTE: I checked recording device in the control of VCS and I see that the protocol endpoint VC both H323 and SIP, while the account Protocol Movi was SIP.

    Take a look at the "call Types and Licensing" section of the VCS administration Guide on pg 378 to detail what types of call will consume what type of license.

  • ERROR, called from the thread NON-INTERFACE QThread

    I am trying to load an image using QtConcurrent:map at the same time and I received this error.

    WARNING: ApplicationPrivate::context: ERROR called NON-INTERFACE QThread thread (0xf9ff68, name = "thread (pooled)" ")
    Fatal: ApplicationPrivate::context: method called from the UI thread

    I simplified the code as follows:

    imagescaler::queuescaling{
    ..    mimageScaling = new QFutureWatcher(this);
    mimageScaling->setFuture(QtConcurrent::mapped(mImageList, scaledImage));
    ..
    }
    
    Image scaledImage(QString file_name) {
       QImage qImage;
       bb::ImageData imageData(bb::PixelFormat::RGBA_Premultiplied, qImage.width(),
      qImage.height());  // causes error
      return imageData;
    }
    

    Anyone know what the problem is or how to work around?

    Thanks for point out the bb:ImageData.  Never noticed the incompatibility.  Image converts ImageData to initialization, so it does not create an error.  However, if I return an ImageData rather than the Image it does not crash.  I then simply convert ImageData of Image in the UI thread and it works very well.

    I'm curious to know why I can return a blank image and I can return an imageData, but I can't go back an Image that's been converted from ImageData.  Do not understand what can or cannot be done outside the UI thread.

  • VCSC non-traversal license installation

    Hello

    I found info on Cisco telepresence video Communication Server Administrator Guide requiring a few keys options that VCS is restarted before the option key will take effect. In such cases, that an alarm will be triggered on the web interface, which will remain in place as a reminder until the system has been restarted.

    Anyone know if add additional licenses non-traversal VCSC Slave (cluster deployment) require really server restart?

    Thank you

    Petar

    Only the following option buttons require a reboot of the server:

    • Crossing Server
    • Starter Pack
    • Advanced Security for account (if it is moved in FIPS mode)

    This as well as other key option information is documented in the 'Manage the key Options' section of the VCS X8.7.2 Administrator's Guide from the pg 295.

  • Calls from [email protected] / * / ip addresses

    Hello world

    I get calls from [email protected] / * / IPS on my Highway VCS trying to dial different numbers. I activated a policy rule of local call to reject asterisk@.* to any destination. * but it does not work and I still get the call attempts.

    Someone has encountered this and knows how to stop these calls?

    Thank you

    Maciek

    Maciej,

    try to replace 'origin' with 'non-authenticated-origin' in your CPL, so that it reads as follows:

    CPL 'origin' field has a value of "is not far" If the message that the CPL is run for is not authenticated.

    You can find more information about the field of the 'non-authenticated-origin"in the VCS administration guide.

    Hope this helps,

    Andreas

  • VCS Cluster DNS problems

    Hello

    I have created a DNS SRV to configure in the FULL of the VCS Cluster domain name.

    The problem is when devices try to enroll in the VCS Cluster; I put in the endpoints, in Gatekeeper registration DNS or IP address of the DNS SRV but the always end points will never reach the cluster of VCS.

    I check the logs in DNS SRV and I don't see any request from devices.

    I think I need to create a virtual IP address with DNS with load balancing, I mean: IP/DNS (FQDN) for the Cluster with load and balance when devices trying to connect to the cluster's IP/DNS it transmits the request to an IP or host name of a host in the cluster.

    DNS cLuster

    23.1.0.201 (vcs.xxx)

    The peer of the cluster:

    23.1.0.32 (vcscontroltc.xxx) Master

    23.1.0.33 (vcscontrolvag.xxx) slave

    XXX--> field

    Is this right?

    Thanks in advance.

    Best regards.

    Hello

    then 23.1.0.201 is the IP address of your DNS server?

    How you need to configure is:

    FULL of the cluster domain name: vcscluster.domain.local

    VCS counterpart A: vcscontroltc.domain.local

    VCS counterpart B: vcscontrolvag.domain.local

    With the above assumptions, that's what you create in DNS:

    -For the FULL domain name cluster, create two A records for vcscluster.domain.local one pointing to 23.1.0.32 and the other pointing to 23.1.0.33. With that, I recommend that you enable alternate on your DNS server.

    -For each peer, create a record, so vcscontroltc.domain.local points to the points 23.1.0.32 and vcscontrolvag.domain.local to 23.0.1.33.

    -Create SRV H323 and SIP records for vcscluster.domain.local. With that, I recommend that you create two SRV records for each service, pointing A Exchange and showing a B counterpart, with a weight and priority. For example:

    _sips._tcp.vcscluster.domain.local-> vcscontroltc.domain.local, priority 1, weight 50

    _sips._tcp.vcscluster.domain.local-> vcscontrolvag.domain.local, priority 1, weight 50

    If you follow the advice above, you should be able to configure all of your interior SIP and H323 endpoints with a h.323 gatekeeper address/SIP proxy address, of vcscluster.domain.local and endpoints must enroll in one of the peers, regardless of whether endpoints supports DNS SRV.

    If the domain that you use is public, you also want to add the SRV records for that domain name. These SRV records must point to your VCS Expressway, to ensure that incoming calls from URI function as it should. For example:

    _sips._tcp.domain.local-> vcse.domain.local, priority 1, weight 100

    If you have several VCS-E you can adjust the SRV records accordingly.

    Hope this helps,

    Andreas

  • Highway VCS cluster

    Hello

    We intend to deploy VCS Cluster consisting of two expressway Expressway.  The two highway will be activated with Dual Interface. Need some clarification regarding the ip and dns address. Here is an example of setting.

    for example

    Highway of VCS A: 192.168.10.2 for the first interface.   192,168.20.2 assigned to the second interface and nattted to 77.100.42.23

    Highway of VCS B: 192.168.10.3 assigned to the first interface. 192.168.20.3 assigned to second iinterface and natted to 77.100.42.24

    name of the cluster: video.exampledomain.com

    FULL domain name: video.exampledomain.com will be be mapped both the public ip address 77.100.42.23 and 77.100.42.24 with the required SRV records.

    When customer movi connect to video, exampledomain.com traffic will be routed to 77.100.42.23 and 77.100.42.24 in "round robin" mode.

    Well confirm the above is the correct way to deployment and what will happen if A vcsexpressway is down. always the first call will fail because the rqurest will be sent to 77.100.42.23 and the second appeal attempt will succeed.

    Krishna.

    Hello Krishna,

    your deployment plan looks good, assuming that 192.168.10.x and 192.168.20.x are different subnets. Please be sure to set up clustering on LAN1 (the interface non-translated) which seems to be part of your plan.

    Concerning the behavior of call when one of the VCS is down, assuming that your SRV records were properly implemented and that the remote caller has good DNS SRV support for its implementation H323 and SIP, the appealing party must switch to VCS work in case of failure of the initial connection to the slaughtered VCS. In any case the result will depend greatly on the conduct of the appellant and his ability to switch to other VCS during his attempt to connect through the slaughtered VCS fails.

    Hope this helps,

    Andreas

  • I just had a phone call from a person who said that it is Windows

    Original title: inf junk - scam

    I just had a phone call from a person who said that it is Windows (non-Microsoft) and said I have viruses that have made some of my windows certificates expire and he would help me to restore the certificates so that I can delete the infected files.  "" I followed some of its directives, i.e. you press Start key simultaneously with the letter e R and typed in "inf junks.  It said that all of the files that were listed are infected files.  He had me so close that window and type ammyy.com who brought up a remote coelio.  I told him I was hesitant to do it, but in order to varify that it was, I would call him back.  He gave me the 'john' and phone 905-588-7942 # name.  I hope that it has not reached way triggers a virus in my being gone that far.  Any suggestions?

    Hello BruceHiggins,

    In addition information of No Mo, I have included some URLS from users who have experienced the same telephone call you under.

    Scam phone call pretending to be Windows support:

    http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/windows_vista-security/scam-phone-call-claiming-to-be-from-Windows/193f0a33-4ad9-4a07-96eb-9a7e3debb269

    I received a phone call from someone who claims to have a Virus:

    http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/windows_vista-security/i-received-a-phone-call-from-someone-claiming-i/4489f388-d6de-416d-9158-0079764bb001

    Thank you

    James

  • alleged phone call from support technique microsoft, saying: I have pc problems

    original title: support phone call microsoft technical

    I just got a phone call from someone saying that they come from the MS support and want to talk to me about the amount of problems that are reported by the 3rd party software on my computer, it would be just

    Hello

    It's a SCAM

    they want or money on your part for programs without value or make an identity theft on you to get even more money and get your internet banking passwords and credit card information, you get allows you to download the software to 'fix' or 'test' for your computer

    Read these tips from Microsoft:

    http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/msName.aspx

    Microsoft has none of the unsolicited telephone calls to help you fix your computer

    In this type of scam cybercriminals are calling you and claim to be of Support technique Microsoft. They offer help with your computer problems. Once scammers have earned your trust, they try to steal and damage your computer with malicious software, including viruses and spyware.

    Although the law enforcement can trace phone numbers, often authors use pay telephones, disposable cell phones or stolen cellular phone numbers. Better avoid fooling themselves rather than try to repair the damage afterwards.

    Treat all unsolicited sceptically telephone calls. Don't provide personal information.

    If you receive an unsolicited call from someone who claims to be from Technical Support Microsoft, hang up. We do not have such calls.

    If you think you might be a victim of fraud, you can report it. For more information, see: what to do if you think you have been scammed.

  • Strange call from the India, claiming that they had been notified that there was an error in my computer?

    Just got a call from the India, claiming that they had been notified that there was an error in my computer? Is this normal? About an hour earlier, I have defraged my computer?

    Hello

    It's a SCAM

    they want or money on your part for programs without value or make an identity theft on you to get even more money and get your internet banking passwords and credit card information, you get allows you to download the software to 'fix' or 'test' for your computer

    read this:

    http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/msName.aspx

    Microsoft has none of the unsolicited telephone calls to help you fix your computer

    In this type of scam cybercriminals are calling you and claim to be of Support technique Microsoft. They offer help with your computer problems. Once scammers have earned your trust, they try to steal and damage your computer with malicious software, including viruses and spyware.

    Although the law enforcement can trace phone numbers, often authors use pay telephones, disposable cell phones or stolen cellular phone numbers. Better avoid fooling themselves rather than try to repair the damage afterwards.

    Treat all unsolicited sceptically telephone calls. Don't provide personal information.

    If you receive an unsolicited call from someone who claims to be from Technical Support Microsoft, hang up. We do not have such calls.

    If you think you might be a victim of fraud, you can report it. For more information, see: what to do if you think you have been scammed.

  • Phone calls from a person claiming to be the computer support online

    I received many telephone calls from people claiming to be agents for Windows technical support. Company called ICS (International Computer Software} they say that a virus has infected my computer I opened an e-mail and it destroyed my software.

    Hello

    It's a SCAM

    they want or money on your part for programs without value or make an identity theft on you to get even more money and get your internet banking passwords and credit card information, you get allows you to download the software to 'fix' or 'test' for your computer

    read this:

    http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/msName.aspx

    Microsoft has none of the unsolicited telephone calls to help you fix your computer

    In this type of scam cybercriminals are calling you and claim to be of Support technique Microsoft. They offer help with your computer problems. Once scammers have earned your trust, they try to steal and damage your computer with malicious software, including viruses and spyware.

    Although the law enforcement can trace phone numbers, often authors use pay telephones, disposable cell phones or stolen cellular phone numbers. Better avoid fooling themselves rather than try to repair the damage afterwards.

    Treat all unsolicited sceptically telephone calls. Don't provide personal information.

    If you receive an unsolicited call from someone who claims to be from Technical Support Microsoft, hang up. We do not have such calls.

    If you think you might be a victim of fraud, you can report it. For more information, see: what to do if you think you have been scammed.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Photos shown do not

    Last week, I bought a Apple Watch. It is under 2.1. My iPhone 6 is running iOS 9.2.1. Apple Watch has been configured to display the last 100 photos in my favorite album. He showed stains about 30 70 or so, with the last appearing as grey areas. Equi

  • KB2572067 update has not been installed.

    Get the message the following updates have not been installed.  The update of security for Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1. SP 1 in Windows XP, Windows Vista & Windows Server 2008 x 86 (KB2572067).  I am running windows XP and have updates set to automa

  • Bing toolbar blocks the Google toolbar

    I had a problem with a Google toolbar disappeared once I downloaded a system adobe to play a video that I found on a popular web site. I have a Dell Inspiron 1545 laptop, with a system of Vista Home Premium on a 64 bit system, I'm also very much a ne

  • link in a screen

    You can link a text in a screen as in HTML? for example, a clickable link to perform an action - transition of the screen? Cheers, mihail

  • How do I set in order to access my att LG android w\kitkat and my laptop w\8.1 and vice versa. Thank you. Roy

    How do I set in order to access my att LG android w\kitkat and my laptop w\8.1 and vice versa. Thank you. Roy