MT poor performance vs modern Windows XP

Similar Questions

• Poor performance on PC Windows 7 wireless

  Hello

  Since I bought a new desktop PC with windows 7, I got network problems.

  Internet connection from my PC has a performance very low network for some reason any, while other machines in my home work perfectly well without any problems.

  I sent my PC to the manufacturer (Medion) so that they could take a look, they thought that the NIC (a Realtek RTL8191SU Wireless LAN 802.11n) has been broken and replaced it.

  But there is still the problem, I tried to update my drivers and even tried to use an alternative wireless adapter but still no luck.

  I have a modem ZTE H220N (KPN Experia box using glass fiber) with 30Mbps.

  I tried to play with my settings my modem wireless and still nothing. There is no update available for the modem because the modem is quite bare.

  The only thing that helped was using a wired connection, but it didn't really solve the problem wireless since the performance falls down once I have it plugged into.
  Note that I tried to plug the other machines to the AP with the same distance between the PA and my PC. I also tried to connect to the other access points with my PC and still the same result.
  Troubleshooting Windows displays all problems.
  I'm sorry if this question has already been resolved and I hope I can find an answer quickly.
  Thank you

  Hello

  Thanks for posting your question in the Microsoft Community.

  I understand that your continuous wireless connection fall frequently. Correct me if I'm wrong.

  I imagine the inconvenience that you are experiencing. I will certainly help the question of fixing.

  To help you suggest several steps to solve the problem, I would appreciate if you could answer the following questions:

  . What is the brand and model of the computer?

  Please follow the methods and mark the question below:

  Method 1:

   

  Step 1:

   

  Start your computer in safe mode with networking:

  Startup options (including safe mode):

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/advanced-startup-options-including-safe-mode

  If the problem is resolved, then follow the next step.

  Step 2:

  You need perform a clean boot to prevent possible ask contradictory from interfering with your computer.

  To put the computer in a clean boot state, you must follow the steps in the article mentioned below.

  How to solve a problem by performing a clean boot? : For more information on the execution of clean boot, follow the link.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

  Note: You must follow step 3 of the article mentioned above to recover the computer to Normal startup after you complete all the steps.

   

  Method 2:

   

   

  Follow the steps in the link below.

  Why is my Internet connection so slow? :

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/why-is-my-Internet-connection-so-slow

  Note: The data files that are infected must be cleaned only by removing the file completely, which means that there is a risk of data loss.

  Note: Reset the Internet Explorer settings can reset security settings or privacy settings that you have added to the list of Trusted Sites. Reset the Internet Explorer settings can also reset parental control settings. We recommend that you note these sites before you use the reset Internet Explorer settings.

  I hope the above information helps you and your response is very important for us to ensure a proper resolution.

   

• bad sound quality in the desktop version but not in the modern windows application

  I have a brand new Microsft Surface Pro 3 with all the updates that are installed and the latest version of Skype.

  When I use the modern windows application, the sound quality is very good.

  When I use the desktop app, it looks like wind. The poor sound is experienced by myself and the recipient and also when I echo test call.

  I uninstalled the windows application modern to have installed both causes a conflict.

  I tried to uninstall and reinstall the app without result.

  It is not the mouse or the speaker settings on my surface, because it works perfectly well when you use the modern windows application.

  any suggestions?

  I have now solved the problem by removing the MCO.

  For all those affected by the poor audio quality in Skype desktop client, please go to:

  Tools > Options > Audio Settings, then uncheck "Automatically adjust microphone settings" and "automatically adjusts the speaker settings.

  Credit for this fix is due to Tim Rolston of lovemysurface.net and I recommend his site to any other users of microsoft surface.

• HP Mini 110-3530NR extremely poor performance on the Internet

  My HP Mini 110-3530NR Netbook has very poor performance on the Internet.  I use Windows 7 Starter.

  Say hello to new coppens1.  I apologize for the delay in my responses.  I have not received the normal e-mail notifications.

  When I had to go to msconfig earlier in our interactions you make sure that the Synaptics driver load with Windows?  Follow these steps to check.

  1. Click Start, type "msconfig" and press ENTER.
  2. Go to the Services tab and search for "HP Software Framework".  This should load with Windows for a lot of the HP software to work properly.
  3. Then go to the Startup tab and make sure that anything it either by "Synaptic" is loaded with Windows.
  4. Save your changes and exit msconfig.
  5. Then go to your touchpad settings and, even once, make sure that the settings are correct.
  6. Finally, restart the machine and make sure it works properly.

  I totally understand if you want to open a new thread as this covered a few topics!  Just make sure to send me a private message with the link so that I can make sure to help you here.

  I wish you a beautiful day JC!

• Poor performance InternetExplorer9

  Hello

  I have my InternetExplorer9 on a clean Windows7 VM thinapped and have Veery poor performance when I run the finished app.
  I tried many things to increase the speed. My normal ie9 starts in 5 seconds, until it's on google.com, my thinapped however ie9
  needs about 10 seconds, even after the restart of the 5th. What I've tried so far is:

  -J' have compressed the ie9.exe when generating

  -J' put 'AutoStartServices = 0' in the Package.ini generating

  -J' put 'NetRelaunch = 0' and 'AutoStartServices = 0' in the Package.ini.

  -J' set the sandbox sand-path %appdata%\microsoft\windows\sendto and the local path (tried both)

  -J' deleted some unnecessary user-specific folders in the project path

  -J' got only InternetExplorer.exe as entry point

  I tried the last few steps of each constellation, but no finished package is better than the others. You have any other suggestions for

  My problem? (I use the Thinapp_4.7.2 by the way)

  Kind regards

  Tobias

  It doesn't matter as long as it is in the right section:

  [Compression]

  CompressionType = None

  [Segregation]

  DirectoryIsolationMode = merged

  [BuildOptions]

  OptimizeFor = mΘmoire

  DisableTransactionRegistry = 1

  I forgot to mention it, but there was a new feature of Internet Explorer 9: hardware acceleration.

  Change IE9 to disable hardware acceleration has helped me get better performance in my VDI environments.

  See:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2528233

  Go to Internet Options, advanced, check ""use the software instead of GPU rendering rendering "."

  Recover application or use sbmerge to update your project file.

  
  

• Poor performance of Firefox after you apply the latest Microsoft Updates (Win 7 x 64); all solutions?

  Recently, I updated to Firefox 27 and noticed really horrible performance (Manager tasks indicates FF connecting a carrot, frequent "Firefox is not responding messages", even strikes in late development in the URL bar). It's on an Ideapad s205 (AMD E450 APU, Win 7 x 64, 8 GB RAM, SSD) who has always had pretty decent web browsing performance for a low end machine.

  At first, I blamed FF because poor performance coincided with the update to version 27, but now I think that the first cause to be a recent Microsoft Update. The reason is that my wife has a laptop with a same low-end APU (APU C60, hard drive 5400 RPM, 4 GB of RAM, Win 7 x 64), and she was getting much better performance with FF27 until I applied a backlog of some 90 + updates. Now she suffers from the same poor performance I am and she is pretty p * ssed at home.

  Interestingly, I have two WIn 7 x 64 Intel computers to office who have 27 FF and are fully patched, and performance are very good. Maybe this problem is specific to AMD APU.

  Any thoughts? I tried to turn off the backend Azure with some comments in this forum, but makes little or no difference.

  Thank you!

  Success! 32 FF seems to have solved my problems of performance. Thank you!

• SG300 switches have poor performance in layer 3?

  We have several switches SG300 Serices. We use them to route traffic to VLAN remote offices, the Internet connections and wireless access Points.

  In a remote office, we have a SG300-10 facility to route the HQ network and the remote office subnet. The SG300 is connected to the seat through fiber and contains several VLAN Tag. If I speed, tests on the fiber of the entrants Netwotk tag link I get decent performance, 80Mbs. If I switch to a networtk who is not priginating of the central administration and road SG300-10 package, I get poor performance. 15 - 20Mbs.

  I have Fireded until a new FW SG300 - 28 p v1.2.7.76. Added a HQ VLAN 101 and VLAN new, 1025. Mapped some Tagged and not marked for each ports.  Switch has been connected to the network of HQ as untagged VLAN 101.  I put a laptop on a unmarked port VLAN 101. Ran some tests, cam is back with 750-850Mbs. great.  Put the same computer laptop on a Port of 101 tag, set the NETWORK card for tag VLAN 101, same test, same speed, 750-850Mbs.

  I configured then laptop for tag VLAN 1025. Connected to the port 1025 VLAN scored. Done speed tests, the results were 15-20Mbs!

  Then I configured laptop for Untagged VLAN 1025. Connected to unagged port 1025 VLAN. Done speed tests, the results were 15-20Mbs!

  It was only the laptop and connect to the net on the SG300 - 28 p P.C. Why this device's performance is so poor when he needs to route?

  Other switches have v1.0.0.27 FW or FW v1.1.2.0. They have similar speed problems. All configured for layer 3.

  Thank you!

  Scott<>

  How are customer gateways and server configured?

  The default gateway for connecting devices should probably be that of the IVS, they are directly connected to. So if you have a server connecting to a SVI 192.168.1.100 then the gateway server should be 192.168.1.100, not a router upstream. Who can create a loop of road if the return circulation.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• VPN poor Performance - Cisco RV220W and routers WRVS4400N

  Hello

  To one of our customer IPSec VPN is established between Cisco RV 220W and routers of Cisco WRVS4400N.

  Router VPN /ISP details are as below

  Location was	Location B
  Details of the Internet ---------------------- DOWNLOAD: 6 to 10 Mbps Upload: 1 to 2 Mbps Details of router ---------------------- Cisco RV220W Firmware: 1.0.3.5 IKE policy Encryption: 3DES Authentication: MD5 Group: Group 2 Life key: 28800 sec VPN strategy Encryption: 3DES Authentication: SHA - 1 Group: 1024 bits (Group 2) Life key: 3 600 s Perfect Forward Secrecy: enabled	Details of the Internet ------------------------- DOWNLOAD: 1.35 Mbps Upload: 1.24 Mbps Details of router ---------------------- Cisco WRVS4400N Firmware version: V2.0.1.3 Phase 1 Encryption: 3DES Authentication: MD5 Group: 1024 bits (Group 2) Life key: 28800 sec Phase 2 Encryption: 3DES Authentication: SHA - 1 Group: 1024 bits (Group 2) Life key: 3 600 s Perfect Forward Secrecy: enabled

  From the day that VPN has been implemented, the performance was poor. Frequent disconnections sessions live to the VPN nodes and very low transfer rate was alarming to users.

  The servers in A location and users to the site B gets authenticated at the server DC level in A location

  Applications of Terminal Server remote as Quickbooks, QQ Evolution, attendance RX serve also the location has by users to the location B

  The login is your time and all applications are extremely slow.

  I tried to copy files between share data between two locations and the results are as follows

  Location A to location B-> 130 Kbps 140 Kbps

  Location location B A-> 150 Kbps to 160 Kbps

  What can be the problem for these poor performance VPN?

  -Change the encryption for the least secure OF THE /MD5 would have a significant impact because it can reduce the overload on the routers?

  -Even if both routers are routers SMB, it has really good VPN flow according to the data sheets. I couldn't find VPN flow mentioned in the WRVS4400N data sheet. One of the sons of CSC, I also noticed the VPN of WRVS4400N flow seemed really low as only about 1.6Mbps. (https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2107881)  Whereas RV220W router has VPN 90Mbps flow, according to the datasheet.

  So, what can be the cause of the problem and what can be fixes possible?

  Help, please!

  ANUP sisi

  Beginner to router Cisco VPN, please help

  RVS4000 was designed to work in a small office. It supports 5 VPN tunnels with a maxium of 2 Mbps flow measured in a laboratory environment. It has a processor that has a motor integrated IPS, who would deliver 20 Mbps LAN - WAN throughput when IPS is enabled.

  RV220W has been designed to operate in a slightly larger office with 25 IPsec VPN tunnels. It has a processor that has a built-in cryptographic engine able to deliver throughput 90 Mbps of IPsec. RV220W also supports 5 SSL VPN tunnels that can be used by employees and business partners for remote access.

• Poor performance Alienware 13

  Hello, I have recently updated my Asus G55VW to 13 Alienware and he's surprisingly poor performance in some games from my old laptop. As far as I know that I put everything to max performance but it is still low in some areas.

  Old sheet

  Intel i7 @ 2.5 GHz to 3.4 GHz

  NVIDIA geforce 660 m

  8 GB ram

  Alienware 13

  Processor Intel i5 1.7 GHz to 2.7 GHz

  NVIDIA geforce 860 m

  8 GB ram

  So far, Borderlands 2 runs poor while others like Warframe can operate at max settings no problem.  Other games like naruto shippuden ultimate ninja storm 3 full bursting cannot run because it selects only the integrated graphics card and I can not change... Right now, I think that the graphics card integrated into the issue and if there is a way to disable it, which could make things much better. Not to mention that any help to increase performance would be greatly appreciated.

  JLM264

  Alienware 13

  Processor Intel i5 1.7 GHz to 2.7 GHz

  You have a 1.7 GHZ dual core CPU... Borderlands 2 recommends the use of 2.4 GHZ quad core CPU

  Your "old" laptop ASUS who had a 2.3 GHZ quad core CPU meets this requirement more than your new machine

  Warframe works very well, because any CPU dual core is sufficient and that's what you have

• Poor performance of VMware reviews

  Hello everyone, I hope someone can help me because I'm out of ideas.

  My guest in VMware operating system performance is very laggy and unresponsive. Opening programs takes a lot of time, and the cursor is laggy. IV ' e tried everything I can think: changed amount of RAM available from 1 to 3, changed the number of cores of 1 to 4, changed the virtual disk in disk of split or a monkey one and does not.

  I also eliminated the pagefile on the total guest OS and still no change.

  I am running Linux Mint 16 (guest) on VMware player 6.0.1 under win 8.1 (host).

  The computer is a Samsung 9 series laptop computer with processor i7-3517u, 8 GB of ram and 256GB sandisk SSD U100.

  The VMware image is currently configured to use the virtual monolithic disk of 20 GB, 2 GB of RAM, 2 CPU cores, NAT connection.

  IV ' e tried to copy the image of the OS on a friends laptop that runs on a laptop from lenovo with processor i5-2310, samsung 256 840 SSD and 6 GB of RAM and it works perfectly.

  One of the things I noticed was that opening the programs as part of the guest OS (even just the linux terminal) uses 100% CPU for a while according to Linux performance monitor but Windows (host), it shows very little use of the processor.

  Anyone know how I can fix this problem?

  Well, with a little help, I solved it. It turns out that my CPU was immobilized at 800 Mhz frequency. The Samsung 9 series, it is called silent mode when you slow down the fan and the CPU frequency is lowered so it is not overheating.

• disc Flash of poor performance

  Hello
  When I run $cellcli EI list physical disk, some of the Flash drive is showing a poor performance.
  
  
  alprod1st09: FLASH_5_0 1116M08EUW poor performance
  alprod1st09: there is no such thing as FLASH_5_1 1116M08EV9
  alprod1st09: FLASH_5_2 1116M08EVA poor performance
  alprod1st09: FLASH_5_3 1116M08EVC poor performance
  
  is it requires to call oracle for the replacement of flash drive... it is very critical?
  Kind regards
  ANI

  One of your flash cards shows also absent I would suggest contact you oracle for a glance. You are on the last cell server software? There used to be a problem that caused problems with the pci riser cards. It is fixed in the latest software drivers.

• Android apps have poor performance

  I have several applications created for Android and all my folios seem poor performance on android devices. It takes a long time for any article to focus on the text (all sheets are built using PDF), and there is a significant for interactivity in a Folio delay, if it does not crash the app entirely. Has anyone else had problems with Android apps? I have not read a lot of useful information on them.

  All my applications are built for android with the dimensions of 2048 x 1536 to make them readable on the Nexus-10. All applications have been rebuilt with v27 and PDFS.

  I'd appreciate comments you can give.

  Thank you

  One thing that can help with the Active Viewer is to design to a smaller size (1024 x 768, for example), use a PDF object and the viewer intensify folios to fit larger screens. Put scale up to adjustment is supported in our 28 Viewer version of AIR and it makes a big difference in performance while maintaining the reasonable quality of the assets.

  Neil

• Poor performance when multitasking on T510 Core i5, Windows 7 64, 4 GB of RAM, NVidia Optimus 512 MB

  I am sadly disappointed with my new Lenovo performance and do not know what could be the cause.

  I just got a new T510 with Core i5, 4 GB of RAM and Windows 7 64 processor. When I run a few programs, such as Photoshop, Virtualbox (850 MB of RAM allocated), Google Chrome with a few tabs I'm stuck.

  It seems that 4 GB of memory is not enough for the work that I did on a 2GB machine a week ago.

  Response time of the computer is a couple of seconds for the window switching. New programs begin to count in a few minutes. Consumption of RAM reaches 98%, even if no single program is listed to consume more than 150 MB in the Manager of tasks or resource monitor. The effects Aero cool work, however, there no sloppiness in the graphical layer of the system.

  Even now, after killing of Virtualbox, remaining processes are up to 89% of the RAM in the resource manager.

  I'm working on the power running with power setting 'Performance', but I can hardly call it a performance.

  It's ridiculous, it was supposed to be a fast multitasking machine and turns out a load of scrap metal. I used to work on 2GB, 1.6 GHz Celeron with processor Intel GMA, had Ubuntu host and Guest Windows XP with 750MB of RAM allocated, plus a couple of tools for programming and never had such problems _on ordinary basis_.

  I plan to run a Ubuntu on this machine because I can't just work this way on Windows 7... I can't even kill a process easily because it takes forever to complete a process.

  A friend of mine runs similar configuration on a slower machine T410 with CPU and the poor graphics and he says it's really strange, because he never had this kind of problem. My PC is new, 4 days from arrival, its is like 2 months old.

  Everyone knows about the similar problem? What could be the cause?

  At this point, I have Chrome with about 10 tabs, Firefox empty, empty Photoshop, Pidgin and 3 Windows Explorer running, Adobe Reader with 1 paper and Sticky Notes. Consumption of RAM is 3495MB used (Yes), 113 and 276 MB free Eve.

  What's not here?

  Please see the attached screenshot:

  

  http://img715.imageshack.us/i/captureybh.PNG/

  Well, the problem is resolved. After removing delivered Norton Internet Security suite, run as plate gold.

  I'll take another antivirus software, then.

  Now, even with the operation of Virtualbox, I still like 2 GB of free RAM. And no lag, no slowdowns. Woohoo.

  * beep * you Norton!

• Trials of poor performance for Matlab and Windows reference

  Hello

  I have a Lenovo Thinkpad W520 with Windows 7 64 bit installed. Compared to other laptops with comparable hardware, my Lenovo is very slow. To prove my thought, I realized with a test evaluation of Matlab (64-bit) and Windows 7 assessment test. In both tests, my Lenovo was worse than other laptops. During testing, I put the Power Manager performance and activated the Lenovo Turbo.

  Now, I wanted to ask, if there are parameters, perhaps in the bios, to speed up the laptop? Or why such a bad performance even if the material is very good?

  Thanks for your help

  Thank you very much for your answer!

  I have dated BIOS version 1.27 to 1.32. Now the benchmark testing all look great!

  Thank you

• Poor performance in VMWare Workstation 10 comments VM, score on memory Windows experience index is low

  Specification of the host is A10-5800 AMD CPU & 8 GB DDR3 - 1600 RAM(dual-channel), running VMware workstation 10 on Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1. WEI (Windows experience index) score on memory is 7.3.

  Comments is running Windows 7 Professional 32-bit SP1. VMware tool has been installed. The WEI score on memory is only 4.5. I can feel the difference when you work in the guest, because of the bad performance RAM problem.

  Some way to optimize the performance of comments?

  Can I assume that the customer has more than 960 MB and less than 1.5 GB of memory?  The more possible memory under-score with less than 1.5 GB memory is 4.5.