VPN poor Performance - Cisco RV220W and routers WRVS4400N

Similar Questions

• Need some advice about the VPN between local Cisco router and remote Watchguard

  Hi all

  I am configuring a Cisco 887 to VPN router to a device of watchguard at the remote site.

  From what I understand, the VPN tunnel is in PLACE. I can ping to the remote server on the 192.168.110.0 of the network, but whenever I try to navigate to it on the local server, it wouldn't work.

  I ping the remote server via the IP address on the local server, but not on the Cisco router. Is - will this work as expected?

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  R5Router #sh crypto isakmp his

  IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association

  DST CBC conn-State id

  110.142.127.237 122.3.112.10 QM_IDLE 2045 ACTIVE

  IPv6 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  R5Router #sh encryption session

  Current state of the session crypto

  Interface: Virtual-Access2

  The session state: down

  Peer: 122.3.112.10 port 500

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed ip 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed 1 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed 6 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed ip host 122.3.112.10 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  Interface: Dialer0

  The session state: UP-ACTIVE

  Peer: 122.3.112.10 port 500

  IKEv1 SA: local 110.142.127.237/500 remote 122.3.112.10/500 Active

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed ip 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 2, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed 1 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed 6 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed ip host 122.3.112.10 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  Crypto ACL 102, should really include only 1 line, that is to say:

  10 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.110.0 0.0.0.255

  and you should have the image mirror on the remote end ACL line too.

  PLS, remove the remaining lines on 102 ACL ACL.

  I guess that the ACL 101 is NAT exemption, if it is pls include "deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.110.0 0.0.0.255" on top of your current line "license".

  Clear the tunnels as well as the NAT translation table after the changes described above.

• Trials of poor performance for Matlab and Windows reference

  Hello

  I have a Lenovo Thinkpad W520 with Windows 7 64 bit installed. Compared to other laptops with comparable hardware, my Lenovo is very slow. To prove my thought, I realized with a test evaluation of Matlab (64-bit) and Windows 7 assessment test. In both tests, my Lenovo was worse than other laptops. During testing, I put the Power Manager performance and activated the Lenovo Turbo.

  Now, I wanted to ask, if there are parameters, perhaps in the bios, to speed up the laptop? Or why such a bad performance even if the material is very good?

  Thanks for your help

  Thank you very much for your answer!

  I have dated BIOS version 1.27 to 1.32. Now the benchmark testing all look great!

  Thank you

• Poor performance TL2000 LTO6 and bridge iSCSI

  Hi, I have a serious performance problem with a TL2000 (LTO6) and an iSCSI bridge.
  Both the TL and the iSCSI bridge run the latest firmware (as of March 29, 2016).

  The backup server is running Windows 2008 R2 Sp1 with the latest updates installed. the server uses the driver recommended for the TL.
  The backup software's Netvault 11.

  The TL is connected to the gateway using the provided cable to SAS and the bridge is connected to the server with a N4032 switch (latest firmware here too), using a VLANs separated, jumbo MTU enabled (and on the bridge iSCSI network cards in the server too).

  I configured two NICs on the bridge, same subnet, a jumbo mtu and different ip address.

  I used this guide to connect to the server: www.dell.com/.../EN , as I followed the user guide to configure the iSCSI Gateway.

  The problem is that backup performance are unacceptable: backups on tape 5 MBs, while the same but on disk backups will work perfectly.

  I tried with jumbo mtu on and outside, with a single iscsi connection or multiple connections iscsi, using a single NIC on the bridge, and then together again. I tried all the driver versions available on the Dell Support for TL2000. I restarted TL, bridge iSCSi and server too: tape backup keep incredibly slow.

  IBM tool shows me the library and the tape like OK drive.

  If I use a unique iSCSI total on 5MBs throughput connection, if I use two connections, the total flow is always 5MBs, about 2.5MBs each connection.

  I tried to disable TUR (although is there a single server connected to the TL2000), but after Netvault lost the disc and in the Device Manager Windows, the drive did not show a yellow exclamation point, saying that the pilot cannot be initialized.

  Any idea or suggestion about this problem?

  Thank you in advance!

  The cause is a bug in the TL2000 firmware known in the last version (D.10, A22). We had to go back to C.30 and then backup started functioning at 40 / 50 MB/s.

• Poor performance of Firefox after you apply the latest Microsoft Updates (Win 7 x 64); all solutions?

  Recently, I updated to Firefox 27 and noticed really horrible performance (Manager tasks indicates FF connecting a carrot, frequent "Firefox is not responding messages", even strikes in late development in the URL bar). It's on an Ideapad s205 (AMD E450 APU, Win 7 x 64, 8 GB RAM, SSD) who has always had pretty decent web browsing performance for a low end machine.

  At first, I blamed FF because poor performance coincided with the update to version 27, but now I think that the first cause to be a recent Microsoft Update. The reason is that my wife has a laptop with a same low-end APU (APU C60, hard drive 5400 RPM, 4 GB of RAM, Win 7 x 64), and she was getting much better performance with FF27 until I applied a backlog of some 90 + updates. Now she suffers from the same poor performance I am and she is pretty p * ssed at home.

  Interestingly, I have two WIn 7 x 64 Intel computers to office who have 27 FF and are fully patched, and performance are very good. Maybe this problem is specific to AMD APU.

  Any thoughts? I tried to turn off the backend Azure with some comments in this forum, but makes little or no difference.

  Thank you!

  Success! 32 FF seems to have solved my problems of performance. Thank you!

• IPsec VPN with Cisco AnyConnect and 1921 ISR G2 router

  Hello

  Is it possible to establish a remote access VPN IPSec using Cisco Anyconnect client with router Cisco ISR G2 1921.

  If someone does share it please the sample configuration. as I've been on this topic since last week a.

  My Cisco rep recommended I have not try AnyConnect a router ISR or ASR.  So I used an Open Source client.  Don't say that AnyConnect won't work, just the route I took on my project.  I work good known configuration for a 1921 with strongSwan as a Client.  It is with IPSEC and IKEV2 using certificates for authentication.

• 2 one-Site VPN Cisco 2801 and with crossing NAT

  Hi guys,.

  I would like to configure two Cisco 2801 using IPSEC/IKE. Both routers are connected to the internet through DSL lines. The DSL line have RFC1918 address side LAN where routers connected to the internet face. I can do NAT on DSL modems.

  Cisco IOS 2801 routers allow to configure site-2-site VPN with NAT crossing?

  Here is a model of physics/IP configuration:

  LAN<->2801 Modem DSL<-Internet->DSL modem<-Priv ip-=""> 2801<-Priv ip-=""><-> LAN

  Thank you

  Gonçalo

  Yes, you're good to go only if one or both of the sites has an IP address which is natted with private IP address statically. The implementation of IPSec on SRI NAT support in most crosses so that shouldn't be a concern

• is eazy customer vpn is supported only on the routers of the 800 pix 7.0 series iOS

  I'm eazy vpn with pix 7.0.4 ios with a 3640 router. the 3640 router is like aeazy vpn client. and the pix as the eazy vpn server. the client connect and continues to ask the xauth parameter. I read in the release notes that requires this vpn eay 12.2 and especially sure ios for 806 routers. the pix also does support eaxy customer vpn routers fo 800 series only. urgent help required. If this true pix sucks big time. they force us to buy routers.they become like microsoft. pls help

  Assane

  According to this document

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps5299/index.html

  Cisco Easy VPN remote is now available on Cisco 800, 1700, 1800, 2800, 3800 and series UBR900 routers, Cisco PIX 501 security equipment and 506th and Cisco VPN 3002 hardware Clients.

  So no support to 3640...

  M.

  Hope that helps if it is

• PPTP VPN or IPSEC for Android and iPAD

  Being new on the RV180 (and routers VPN besides) I had trouble getting a VPN's, supporting my iPad and Android devices. However, I understand that an IPSEC connection would be a safer sollution. Unfortunately I can't find a clear statement anywhere to do it.

  I found descriptions/parameters in the different RV180 of the setting of the (few) in mobile platforms. So far not managed to get the installation program.

  Little help to start would be great!

  Thank you very much.

  Ronald

  Hello Robert.

  My name is Chris and I work at the Cisco Small Business Support Center.

  The PPTP option will be much easier to install, and most devices have a built-in capability of PPTP.

  The RV180 supports the IPSEC tunnels, but only for links from site to site or a remote user with the client software.  Some of the other features of our support SSL VPN connections, which would allow you to use the Cisco Anyconnect client available for android, but SSL VPN is not a characteristic of the RV180.

  On my Android (Droid X running Android 2.3.4) phone he built in VPN, IPSEC and PPTP client.  Yours is probably as well, but if not there should be a few apps available.

  If you decide to go with PPTP you can configure it like this on the RV180:

  1. go to the router admin page and click on VPN > IPsec > VPN users.

  2. check the box to enable the PPTP server.

  3. complete the range of internal addresses for your customers to use PPTP (192.168.1.200 - 192.168.1.210 for example)

  4. click on save.

  5. Once you click on save, you should be able to edit the table of parameters of VPN client.

  6. click on add, check enabled, enter a user name and password for the PPTP user to use and for the protocol type, select PPTP.

  7. click Save to add the user.

  Once this is done, you should be able to go into the settings on your Android device and add a VPN for PPTP connection.   Fill in the same information you setup of the RV180 and you should be able to connect.

  The server address will be the WAN IP of your RV180.

  As far as IPSEC goes, the process is similar but a little more complicated.

  1. on the router admin page go to VPN > IPsec > Basic VPN configuration.

  2. choose the VPN client for peer type.

  3. name connection (it is used on the router)

  4. choose a pre-shared key to be used with this connection.

  5. for remote WAN IP address, you can leave the default remote.com

  6. for the Local gateway Type, you'll want to choose IP

  7. to Local WAN IP select IP and enter the IP address of the RV180 (WAN IP)

  8. for LAN Local, enter the local network for the RV180 ID (default is 192.168.1.0)

  9. to the Local LAN subnet mask enter 255.255.255.0

  10. click on save.

  The steps above create a VPN IPSec tunnel using the default values of the router, which you can view by clicking on default settings under VPN > IPSEC.

  Now you just set your phone.  On my phone, I have an option for Advanced IPSEC VPN, but yours may be different, or you may need to use an application like a customer, if your phone does not have built-in IPSEC VPN.

  On my Droid X, I want to go wireless and networks, VPN settings, Advanced IPSEC VPN, add a new virtual private network.

  My phone uses models of connection, so be sure to choose one that fits your tunnel on the RV180 parameters.

  Enter the RV180 WAN IP address as the VPN server, as well as the pre-shared key, install you on the RV180.

  Make sure that all connection settings that you have configured on the RV180.

  You will also be asked for an internal subnet IP address, and for this, you must enter the Local LAN and subnet mask, that you configured on the RV180 in steps 8 and 9 above.

  I wish I could be more specific, but it seems that there are several different menus and options depending on what Android phone using your.

  I hope that this helps, but if not feel free to respond and I'll try to explain.

• HP Mini 110-3530NR extremely poor performance on the Internet

  My HP Mini 110-3530NR Netbook has very poor performance on the Internet.  I use Windows 7 Starter.

  Say hello to new coppens1.  I apologize for the delay in my responses.  I have not received the normal e-mail notifications.

  When I had to go to msconfig earlier in our interactions you make sure that the Synaptics driver load with Windows?  Follow these steps to check.

  1. Click Start, type "msconfig" and press ENTER.
  2. Go to the Services tab and search for "HP Software Framework".  This should load with Windows for a lot of the HP software to work properly.
  3. Then go to the Startup tab and make sure that anything it either by "Synaptic" is loaded with Windows.
  4. Save your changes and exit msconfig.
  5. Then go to your touchpad settings and, even once, make sure that the settings are correct.
  6. Finally, restart the machine and make sure it works properly.

  I totally understand if you want to open a new thread as this covered a few topics!  Just make sure to send me a private message with the link so that I can make sure to help you here.

  I wish you a beautiful day JC!

• Cisco RV220W w Win Server R2 Essentials 2012: connection anywhere access

  Hello

  I recently updated a network six computers with Windows Server 2012 Essentials R2.  The problem I have is that I am unable to access anywhere to put in place correctly, with the most common being of error messages: 1) anywhere access to your server is blocked & 2) there may be more than one router on your network (which does not exist).  I have UPnP active (although have hesitated to do) & port 80 & 443 is forwarded to the IP address of servers. The previous server used before the upgrade was Windows Sever 2012 Essentials and after of many trials & errors had access Anywhere works fine for our needs for about two years.  The router that has not changed, nor have the settings because it did not work properly is a Cisco RV220W.  Any help or any settings on the router to check/change would be greatly appreciated, since I'm pretty much of ideas & need to get remote access to the top & running for this case.

  Thank you

  Paul

  Hello

  Before starting my answer, I want to let you know that I have no experience whatsoever with the anywhere access system. I have never set up or used. That being said, I did a little research and found that, generally, just redirect ports 80 and 443 to the server and also to enable uPnP on the router so that the other ports required get configured manually.

  According to the information I have found, there are several other ports that must be opened via uPnP and maybe that's the part that doesn't work.

  Here is the document that I found:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/14153.Windows...

  I mention that, in addition to opening ports 80 and 443, you also need the 25. 1723, 987, and 3389.

  Here are my recommendations:

  1. check the uPnP on the Rv220W table to see if other ports are open on the server. To do this, go to Administration - settings - Discovery - Discovery UPnP, make sure that it is enabled and then checked the table to see if other ports seem to be open on the server.

  2-if they are not, and then open manually. To do this, go to the firewall - access rulesand add rules for all necessary ports.

  I hope that was helpful.

• AAA Cisco 600 and 700

  Cisco ACS GANYMEDE + AAA can be activated for telnet to Cisco 600 and 700 routers?

  Unfortunately you can not configure radius AAA or Ganymede in routers series 600 or 700.

• wireless printer can't be found through CISCO RV220w

  Hi tech,.

  I just bought Prixma MG5420 and attached to the CIsco RV220w. The printer receives the ip address, and it is shown on the staus-> the router LAN interface. But when I try to search for the printer on the same network from a computer with windows 7, its not able to find it.

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Thank you.

  Zaki,

  Go to Wireless-> basic settings and disable the isolation wireless in the SSID for the SSIDS to which the printer is connected to.

  -Marty

• SG300 switches have poor performance in layer 3?

  We have several switches SG300 Serices. We use them to route traffic to VLAN remote offices, the Internet connections and wireless access Points.

  In a remote office, we have a SG300-10 facility to route the HQ network and the remote office subnet. The SG300 is connected to the seat through fiber and contains several VLAN Tag. If I speed, tests on the fiber of the entrants Netwotk tag link I get decent performance, 80Mbs. If I switch to a networtk who is not priginating of the central administration and road SG300-10 package, I get poor performance. 15 - 20Mbs.

  I have Fireded until a new FW SG300 - 28 p v1.2.7.76. Added a HQ VLAN 101 and VLAN new, 1025. Mapped some Tagged and not marked for each ports.  Switch has been connected to the network of HQ as untagged VLAN 101.  I put a laptop on a unmarked port VLAN 101. Ran some tests, cam is back with 750-850Mbs. great.  Put the same computer laptop on a Port of 101 tag, set the NETWORK card for tag VLAN 101, same test, same speed, 750-850Mbs.

  I configured then laptop for tag VLAN 1025. Connected to the port 1025 VLAN scored. Done speed tests, the results were 15-20Mbs!

  Then I configured laptop for Untagged VLAN 1025. Connected to unagged port 1025 VLAN. Done speed tests, the results were 15-20Mbs!

  It was only the laptop and connect to the net on the SG300 - 28 p P.C. Why this device's performance is so poor when he needs to route?

  Other switches have v1.0.0.27 FW or FW v1.1.2.0. They have similar speed problems. All configured for layer 3.

  Thank you!

  Scott<>

  How are customer gateways and server configured?

  The default gateway for connecting devices should probably be that of the IVS, they are directly connected to. So if you have a server connecting to a SVI 192.168.1.100 then the gateway server should be 192.168.1.100, not a router upstream. Who can create a loop of road if the return circulation.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• RV220W and Port forwarding

  Hello

  I have a problem with my Cisco RV220W with Firmware 1.0.3.5

  I have in my local network a Dreambox with the IP 192.168.1.230, he listen Port 8880.

  How can I implement a WAN port forwarding to the Dreambox?

  Thank you

  Michael

  Hi Michael,

  Thank you for posting. Please follow the steps below to transfer the port to your Dreambox:

  1. Log in to the router, then go to: Firewall-> Access Control-Services > custom.
  2. Press 'Add' and then type Dreambox name, TCP for type. The Port of departure and Port of finish will be 8880. Press "Save".
  3. Go to the IPv4 firewall rules and press 'Add '. Use the following settings:

  Area: No reliable (WAN)

  Area: Trust (LAN)

  Service: Dreambox

  Action: Always allow the

  Source host: no

  Send to the Local (DNAT IP) server: type the address LAN IP of the Dreambox here device (i.e. 192.168.1.150)

  Ignore the other settings on this page and press 'Save' at the bottom. You should now be able to reach the Dreambox from the Web using: 8880

  Please let us know if it works or if you need further assistance.