multicast on general trunk port

Similar Questions

• How to restrict multicast traffic to specific ports on GS716Tv3?

  I can not find specific instructions to limit traffic of multicast on the smart switch GS715Tv3.

  I need to force all multicast traffic to travel on a specific set of interfaces, or at least stay within a given virtual LAN on the switch to which it is native. All the changes you want multicast servers and listeners will be on these interfaces in their separate vLAN.

  We have several GS715Tv3 switches configured identically, but multicast traffic does not pass between the switches.

  Topology:

  Eight GS716Tv3 smart switches, each configured with three VLANS identical.

  No traffic should pass between these VLANS on the switch or pass between the switches

  In other words, even if all the 8 switches each have a vLAN named "IOSubsystem", I do not considered the same vLAN.

  .

  vLAN 4 is corresponding to the hosts of Linux to address major

  vLAN 5 is for the audio subsystem

  vLAN 6 is for the IO subsystem

  VLAN each switch 4 has two active ports, a session to the external interface of the main Linux host and the other to a central switch of 9th GS716Tv3 where a system of software development is also linked.

  VLAN each 5 switch connects to the components of the audio subsystems (not shown).

  VLAN each switch 6 has two active ports, a going inward a lead Linux host interface and one for the IO subsystem.

             -> [vLAN4 | g10]---> [Switch #9]-+.
  
             -> [vLAN4 | g9]-> [Linux host #1: eth0]                 |
  
  [Switch #1]-> [vLAN6: g1]-> [Linux host #1 | eth1]                 |
  
             -> [vLAN6: g2]-> [e/s 1 subsystem]                   |
  
                                                                |
  
             -> [vLAN4 | g10]---> [Switch #9]- +---> [software Dev host]
  
             -> [vLAN4 | g9]-> [Linux host #2: eth0]                 |
  
  [Switch #2]-> [vLAN6: g1]-> [Linux host #2 | eth1]                 |
  
             -> [vLAN6: g2]-> [subsystem/o 2]                   |
  
  ...                                                           ~
  
                                                                |
  
             -> [vLAN4 | g10]---> [Switch #9]-+.
  
             -> [vLAN4 | g9]-> [Linux host #8: eth0]
  
  [Switch #8]-> [vLAN6: g1]-> [Linux host #8 | eth1]
  
             -> [vLAN6: g2]-> [i/o subsystem #8]

  We get multicast traffic unwanted between each of these systems, causing corruption of our stream. We limit the multicast traffic on vLAN6 of each switch to stay on the vLAN6 of this specific switch.

  Thanks for any help.

  To switch the management VLAN to 4.

  Make sure you have 2-way switch, one in VLAN4 in a VLAN1.

  4 and apply the value of the system you use to a static IP address to the switch and confirm the access to the web configuration and then change "management VLAN ID. then pass the system that you use on the port or any VLAN 4, then you should have access, otherwise, wait about 60-90sec and try again, because you might have PLEASE and it will block anything on the port for just under its set to "Enabled" 'Fast Link '.

  Then under "IP Configuration" value switches other IP address in IP range of VLAN4.

  For the love of Simplisicty, unmarked ports should never be in 1 VLAN simultaneously.

  And instead of using the point and click, goto "Port PVID Configuration" and just create the VLAN it.

  Member of the PVID and VLAN the same thing for a port, on what VLAN, it must be in the database

  And to confirm, you have a cable from switch to each VLAN? You can cut down on cables and ports if you tag/trunk ports to the next switch. then all VLAN 3 just 1 cable between each pair of switches, saving you at least 4 ports on each switch.

  Just an example of my GS724T (ignore ports g8 and g-19-20, their current PVID is because of something else you do not, LACP and Span/Monitoring):

  All ports are configured to a single VLAN, my 'LAN hand' is VLAN12, that the management VLAN is set for, g23-24 ports VLAN trunks, they are set on tagg VLAN12 and 14 when the traffic is out of these ports, then switch to the other side reads the consequence tagg and acts, that way I don't need 2 cables/port for each of them.

  

• Reference Dell powerconnect 5524 cannot ping between coelio and trunk port

  Hello...

  We set up a new switch of 5524 I untagged on vlan 20 and access ports where vlan 20 I allowed. I created a computer on the access port on the same trunk port ip net... cant ping beween them. I'm no expert of switch, so I wonder what I missed. I did the same thing on a dell old 3524 and it works directly...

  Here's the port config I tried to do a ping beween is 6 and 10 ports

  (Another thing, how how to remove):

  switchport mode trunk
  switchport access vlan none)

  Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  interface vlan 1
  IP 88.131.90.252 255.255.255.240
  !
  interface vlan 5
  the name 'SCE CJA'
  !
  interface vlan 6
  the name "out of Tele2.
  !
  interface vlan 7
  name "Outside Telenor"
  !
  interface vlan 8
  name "TDC Multivrf"
  !
  interface vlan 20
  TDC-CISCO-LAN name
  !
  [0mMore: , quit: q or CTRL + Z, one line: interface vlan 21]
  the name "FW inside."
  !
  interface vlan 99
  name «FW sync»
  !
  gigabitethernet1/0/1 interface
  Description CPE1
  switchport access vlan 5
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/2
  Description CPE2
  switchport access vlan 5
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/3
  Df description
  spanning tree portfast
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport access vlan no
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/4
  Description Oupps-cb2
  [0mMore: , quit: q or CTRL + Z, a single line: spanning tree portfast]
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport access vlan no
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/5
  Upp-ccm1 description
  spanning tree portfast
  switchport access vlan 20
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/6
  Oupps-ccm2 description
  spanning tree portfast
  switchport access vlan 20
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/7
  Tdc-multivrf1 description
  switchport access vlan 8
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/8
  TDC-multivrf2 description
  switchport access vlan 8
  !
  [0mMore: , quit: q or CTRL + Z, one line: interface gigabitethernet1/0/9]
  Description Oupps-cb-tq03
  spanning tree portfast
  switchport mode trunk
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/10
  Description Oupps-cb-tq04
  spanning tree portfast
  switchport mode trunk
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/11
  Tele2-outside description
  switchport access vlan 6
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/12
  Tele2-outside description
  switchport access vlan 6
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/13
  Telenor-outside description
  switchport access vlan 7
  !
  [0mMore: , quit: q or CTRL + Z, one line: interface gigabitethernet1/0/14]
  Telenor-outside description
  switchport access vlan 7
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/15
  Description Word-Oupps-fw-tq01-inside
  switchport mode trunk
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/16
  Description Word-Oupps-fw-tq02-inside
  switchport mode trunk
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/17
  FW-sync description
  switchport access vlan 99
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/18
  FW-sync description
  switchport access vlan 99
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/19
  Description Word-Oupps-fw-tq01-outside
  [0mMore: , quit: q or CTRL + Z, a single line: switchport mode trunk]
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/20
  Description Word-Oupps-fw-tq02-outside
  switchport mode trunk
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/22
  FW-Sync description
  switchport access vlan 99
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/23
  Description Word-Oupps-FW-tq01-outside
  192.168.11.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
  switchport mode trunk
  !
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/24
  Description Word-AIN-LAN-SW
  switchport access vlan 20
  !
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 88.131.90.241

  [0mMore: , quit: q or CTRL + Z, a single line:]

  Information of VLAN

  The name of the VLAN Tag Ports Ports unmarked Type permission
  ---- ------------ ------------------ ------------------ --------- -------------
  1 1 article gi1/0/3-4, default required
  Article gi1/0/9-10
  item in gi1/0/15-16,
  item in gi1/0/19-21,
  item in gi1/0/23,
  item in gi1/0/25-48,
  TE1/0/1-2.
  GI2/0/1-48.
  TE2/0/1-2.
  IG3/0/1-48.
  TE3/0/1-2.
  IG4/0/1-48.
  TE4/0/1-2.
  IG5/0/1-48.
  TE5/0/1-2.
  GI6/0/1-48.
  TE6/0/1-2.
  gi7/0/1-48.
  TE7/0/1-2.
  gi8/0/1-48.
  TE8/0/1-2, m 1-32
  5 CPE TDC article gi1/0/3-4, item in gi1/0/1-2 permanent required
  [0mMore: , quit: q or CTRL + Z, one line: article gi1/0/9-10]
  item in gi1/0/15-16,
  item in gi1/0/19-20,
  item in gi1/0/23
  6 outside section gi1/0/3-4, item in gi1/0/11-12 permanent required
  Tele2 item in gi1/0/9-10,
  item in gi1/0/15-16,
  item in gi1/0/19-20,
  item in gi1/0/23
  7 outside article gi1/0/3-4, item in gi1/0/13-14 required permanent
  Telenor item in gi1/0/9-10,
  item in gi1/0/15-16,
  item in gi1/0/19-20,
  item in gi1/0/23
  8 TDC Multivrf item in gi1/0/3-4, item in gi1/0/7-8 permanent required
  Article gi1/0/9-10
  item in gi1/0/15-16,
  item in gi1/0/19-20,
  item in gi1/0/23
  TDC-CISCO-LA 20, article gi1/0/3-4, item in gi1/0/5-6, item in gi1/0/24 required permanent
  N item in gi1/0/9-10,
  item in gi1/0/15-16,
  [0mMore: , quit: q or CTRL + Z, one line: item in gi1/0/19-20,]
  item in gi1/0/23

  In safe mode the PVID is 1 VLAN by default. You can do this by entering the command #switchport trunk vlan native {number of vlan}. If Cisco is configured to accept and send the marked packets and has an IP address in the subnet of VLAN 20, it should be able to communicate with other devices in VLAN 20.

• Priority of VLAN on a Trunk port

  What is the easiest way to give a single VLAN a higher priority than the other on a trunk port?  I have two VLANS, VLAN 10 and by default.  I want to VLAN 10 to have a 802 .1p priority 6 and I want the default VLAN priority of 2.  Is it possible in basic QOS mode, or do I need access to advanced mode?

  Thank you!

  This networking wiki has lots of good information and follow. Looking at what you have planned, everything looks good to me. Let us know how it goes with the implementation.

• on WAP 321 trunk port

  I intend to deploy cisco WAP321 on my client and after rading the document on WAP321, he said the WAP321 support for VLAN ID function, but I can't find that it supports for trunk port because I would like to connect the LAN 321 WAP port to the cisco SMB switch SG300/SG200. is the trunk port already activated on port LAN 321 WAP so I don't have to set up or not?

  need your support and help

  Hey Bram. Yes, it supports the trunk. You configure it vlan untagged on the local networking. VLANS with each switch is no problem.

• The trunk port vs access port speed

  I'm going to put in place a 4900M for a temporary training class, for 1 GB PC connected client.  I used an interface of 10 GB with a X 2-10 G - SR which will connect via fiber 62.5 microns, to a 10 GB interface 4948 with an SFP-10 GB - SR.  With respect to the config, I have the installer of the te1/1 4900 M as a port of access to the 4948.  Connectivity is fine, as well as the routing.  But when we use the client connectivity of the PC (connection to 10 GB of storage) drive, we get speeds of great reading but when he tries to write, it slows down and ends in error.

  Question 1: Would it make a difference if the 4900M was connected via a trunk port to the 4948?

  I think the problem is the maximum length and the length of the fibre 62.5 transmit\receive transceivers, but I want to dismiss the switchport configuration.

  I doubt very much if a trunk port change would make a difference.

  Certainly not something I've ever met.

  Jon

• SRW2048 - trunk port

  Hello

  I have a question according to the behavior of the trunk port.

  I need to connect Linksys Cisco Catalyst switch. On the catalyst I've implemented the port in trunk mode.

  I also put the SRW2048 port in trunk mode. But the switches are not able to communicate with each other.

  Is it possible to implement on the SRW2048 to accept all VLAN Tags on the trunk port. Because it looks like

  be slightly different behavior of cisco switches where are all the VLAN to the trunk mode port.

  I don't speak dot1q encapsulation (tag VLAN)

  The switch has the new firmware: v1.2.2d

  Thank you for your response.

  Juraj

  In contrast to the catalyst, the SRW does not automatically add all the VLANS on the switch to a trunk port. Instead, you must do all your Member VLAN trunk mode port.

• How to add a VLAN on a trunk port and channal port

  Hi all

  I need to set up a configuration details below.

  1 how to add several VLANs on Cisco 4500 switch trunk port. (vlan existing also will be there)

  2. I have also 2 4500 switch to shared resources and channel ports.

  So my question is should I add new VLANs on the trunk port and port also channel?

  Looking for an answer

  It depends on your existing configuration.  If you have not specified WHAT VLAN is allowed, they would be by default.  If this isn't the case, you need to add the VLAN again to the definition of trunk.

  Too far again go to that VLAN, that also depends.  IF you have VTP really set up, you have to create the new vlan on one of the master switches in VTP (probably your 4500) and the definition spread to other switches.   If this isn't the case, then you declare new VLANs on each switch that would need them.

• Use of the Trunk Ports (Cisco) on the management interface

  Hi all

  Background:

  We are in the process of consolidation of 2 farms of esx servers and will end up with 10 guests in a single cluster. Guests come from 2 VLAN separate (say 10 of VLANs and vlan 20). A test I took one of the hosts of HA/DRS and tests with it. For HA and DRS to work efficiently and properly in common all resources, we all want vm to leave both VLAN access to move to any host in the cluster.

  The test:

  My single host mentioned above, I created 2 groups of ports on a vswitch, vlan10 tag and with vlan20, I deployed a VM and tried on the two IP address ranges. It worked (with the correct settings of defined IP by VLAN) but as soon as we resources shared the port used by the management of network vmkernel port we lost the connection to the HOST from a management perspective. What the question is that it is possible to connect the management network a trunk port? We have 2 network interfaces connected to the vSwitch and both used for the VM traffic as well as management traffic. That's how they are currently implemented except that the switch port is on a VLAN-specific rather than shared resources.

  Thank you very much

  Chris

  Hi Chris

  Yes, the network management also accepts the vlan tagging/trunking.

  Just add the number VLAN on the Portgroup.

  Maybe you can do a printscreen with the current configuration?

• Cannt get ip dhcp from a trunk port

  I have my vmnic0 of management on a trunk port interface. installation fails because it cannot get an IP dhcp on one vlan specific. Is there a way to mark the frame with a tag of VLANs when installing?

  Management LAN is 60 VLANS in your environment? One thing you could do is to configure the trunk physical switch port to use VLAN 60 as the "vlan native ', which is unidentified.

  This will keep the port as a trunk, but will the management of your NETWORK card to access the network without 802. 1 q of marking.

• Trunking ports (aggregation of links) does not

  Hello

  I have a single server ESX 4 (hp dl380g5), with 2 natachasery connected to a switch hp 2510 - 48g GB. I created a trunk on the switch ports 1 and 2 and they hooked up to two natachasery ESX.

  I have only 1 vSwitch in ESX and storage space (no VMkernel) that has the Service Console and the network of the VM. I activated this vSwitch (vSwitch0) on IP Hash load balancing to create a theoretical trunk on my 2 GB cards. The two NICA belong to vSwitch0

  When I read/write data to the virtual machine only on trunk ports now seems to manage the data and not both at the same time and with the same flow of data or usage that I expect.

  Is this expected behavior? I have something wrong or bad understand something here?

  Thank you

  Pascale

  I guess you are aware that the mechanism of hash IP packets with an IP - X to another IP - there are always transmitted only a single port physical thorugh, but never through multiple ports at the same time? Therefore, you will never get an increase in throughput for a single "conversation" between IP - X and IP - Y, no matter how much rising physical your chest has. This is due to potential for learning MAC layer 2 and other issues.

  Have you tested with a number of different source/destination IPs connections?

  If you have tested only a small number of connections, you could be 'unlucky' that the hash produced the same uplink of Teddy for all connections.

  Alternatively, you can view the network esxtop notice to see what Teddy what kind/loads of traffic.

• BT Vision (UK IPTV / Internet)-+ Multicast Unicast on same port wired?

  Hello

  I recently bought a Nighthawk R8000 to replace my BT Home Hub 4. Everything goes fine until I checked the BT Vision service I have. This box uses the internet standard and multicast for television services.

  The problem I have is that I can only have one or the other work at any time. So if I set up IPTV to cable port 4 bridge mode I get TV multicast channels but lose the standard Internet features.

  If I then disable bridge IPTV mode I get internet services normal but lose the multicast channels.

  Is there a mode / setting etc. that supports two IPTV multicast and unicast traffic to the same cable port?

  It feels like this should be possible, I'm not sure what method to achieve this.

  See you soon,.

  Wayne.

  Hi all

  This is a firmware of the trial that you can try to make it work.

• If vlan native between Trunk ports not configured so what happens?

  I have a network where two ports of junction are allowed vlan 9 but not native VLANs configured. will be affect performance?

  by default the vlan1 is configure the vlan native to assign a vlan on the interface different native

  switchport trunk vlan native xxx

  HTH

  Richard

• Impossible to get trunk port to work on 4402 and 6509

  I'm having a problem getting circuits developed on a pair of 4402 I just expdis preconfigured.

  The switches are running Catos.

  I've tried both using a SHIFT and individual ports on the WLC, and the only way I can access the WLC is when the switch port is configured as an access port.

  Whenever I have change the link mode on, I lose access.

  I tried to restart it and that didn't work either.

  The subnet manager and ap - manager is in vlan 254, and I put the vlan native of the switch ports to VLANs 254.

  I tried all forms of the sheath (desirable, nonegotiate etc.), but I just will not work.

  I use this exact set elsewhere without any problems.

  Controller was originally on 4.2.130 and is now on 5.1.150.

  Someone has an idea or two?

  Very well. First make sure that the wlc which management Manager and thus lies on the same vlan. Also, make sure that it is not signposted in the wlc which means that it is set to '0 '. On the trunk dot1q, assign it vlan native what the wlc is configured for. Make sure that you do not have the global command "tag dot1q vlan native. Also male that the service port has an ip address and not routable in your network.

• trunk port creation!

  Hi all

  How to convert the physical interface Port Trunking 802. 1 q!

  I have VM Machines and I want to put on different VLANS.

  "the physical switch support trunking.

  Thank you

  For this option, you can see the example in the article knowledge base that I have provided. Simply configure the VLANS allowed according to your needs and add the tag VLAN appropriate to each of the groups of port.

  André