My PC spikes to 100% cpu

Similar Questions

• Windows Update / SvcHost.exe 100% Cpu in the Task Manager

  This I know is not new to too many of us. Again - it's November 2013 and I would like to know how it happened AND what to do to fix it! Since 1997, I've built a lot of computers. I've never had this problem occur up to this relocation. Have reinstalled XP for XPSP3 several times. Don't waste time questioning my knowledge. Idem: components, motherboard, memory, nothing has CHANGED. The only thing that is different IS - when I finished installing Windows XP with Windows XPSP3 - tested the functionality - fast as * - magazine 'OBSERVER of EVENTS' - no problem, constantly check the CPU usage - low. My next step to activate Windows update to get updates to secure my system. Of course, the CPU spikes at 100% - due to a service request host CPU! I have to say - IF the meter would have a parameter to 200% - I have no doubt she would be higher than 100%. Even if I am sure of the rightness of my process to install the OS (once I've done several times over the years), I decided since I have not loaded any other thing - I format the drive (Nov 19) and start all over again. I'm sitting here today, with a computer case with components of audited operation, with a properly installed OS, motherboard drivers installed - do anything else and I can't do windows updates. Note: the first attempt install (17 Nov) - I tried the advice on Microsoft sites, the fix it systematic, installation recommended a version of net framework without result. There are also other tips to run a routine (don't ask--I do not dig up these data) in 'safe' mode which also failed to remedy. Frankly, I rarely use advice of experts even out there, but I decided that if it worked or not - I wanted a new facility, one last time to have a computer working properly that I built myself and gift. I'm getting old - at a time of my life when you start to reduce their material possessions. How is it possible that someone can do something of so many times with the certainty of having this problem and read both of are amazed with this? And spare me the absurdity of the verification of malware, viruses, bad drivers. This computer did not have any exposure to having these problems! We can safely assume is not a problem with hardware - even working properly - as much with this same question described the components that are very different. My deduction is: something is wrong in the Center Microsoft update or Windows update, I tried both! I believe (leaving aside the suggestions of some of the shenanigans) too trying to pass - after all the updates about 120 give or take a little number of. In any case - if there is no assistance 'out there' to answer a customer to Microsoft who bought Windows3.1; Windows 95; Windows 98; Millennia-old Windows; Windows Xp Windows Vista on my wife's computer. Windows 7 on my build recent just to enjoy the music - I would like to than the courtesy to get a solution to this problem. It seems very simple to me someone at Microsoft to round the most important security updates - onto a disk (compressed - many of us have a big hard drives and WinZip) and provide them with we ONLY CHARGE for POSTAGE - OK, OK adds a dollar or two. Leave aside the patches for patches. You know what it takes. The purchase of new hardware or OS systems is out of the question WHY? Because either we cannot it and above all - WE HERE ARE STANDING BY a product Microsoft WE believe! Try to make it in time for Christmas - he will do much for the image of Microsoft. Have a happy Thanksgiving to all!

  This I know is not new to too many of us. Again - it's November 2013 and I would like to know how it happened AND what to do to fix it! Since 1997, I've built a lot of computers. I've never had this problem occur up to this relocation. Have reinstalled XP for XPSP3 several times. Don't waste time questioning my knowledge. Idem: components, motherboard, memory, nothing has CHANGED. The only thing that is different IS - when I finished installing Windows XP with Windows XPSP3 - tested the functionality - fast as * - magazine 'OBSERVER of EVENTS' - no problem, constantly check the CPU usage - low. My next step to activate Windows update to get updates to secure my system. Of course, the CPU spikes at 100% - due to a service request host CPU! I have to say - IF the meter would have a parameter to 200% - I have no doubt she would be higher than 100%. Even if I am sure of the rightness of my process to install the OS (once I've done several times over the years), I decided since I have not loaded any other thing - I format the drive (Nov 19) and start all over again. I'm sitting here today, with a computer case with components of audited operation, with a properly installed OS, motherboard drivers installed - do anything else and I can't do windows updates. Note: the first attempt install (17 Nov) - I tried the advice on Microsoft sites, the fix it systematic, installation recommended a version of net framework without result. There are also other tips to run a routine (don't ask--I do not dig up these data) in 'safe' mode which also failed to remedy. Frankly, I rarely use advice of experts even out there, but I decided that if it worked or not - I wanted a new facility, one last time to have a computer working properly that I built myself and gift. I'm getting old - at a time of my life when you start to reduce their material possessions. How is it possible that someone can do something of so many times with the certainty of having this problem and read both of are amazed with this? And spare me the absurdity of the verification of malware, viruses, bad drivers. This computer did not have any exposure to having these problems! We can safely assume is not a problem with hardware - even working properly - as much with this same question described the components that are very different. My deduction is: something is wrong in the Center Microsoft update or Windows update, I tried both! I believe (leaving aside the suggestions of some of the shenanigans) too trying to pass - after all the updates about 120 give or take a little number of. In any case - if there is no assistance 'out there' to answer a customer to Microsoft who bought Windows3.1; Windows 95; Windows 98; Millennia-old Windows; Windows Xp Windows Vista on my wife's computer. Windows 7 on my build recent just to enjoy the music - I would like to than the courtesy to get a solution to this problem. It seems very simple to me someone at Microsoft to round the most important security updates - onto a disk (compressed - many of us have a big hard drives and WinZip) and provide them with we ONLY CHARGE for POSTAGE - OK, OK adds a dollar or two. Leave aside the patches for patches. You know what it takes. The purchase of new hardware or OS systems is out of the question WHY? Because either we cannot it and above all - WE HERE ARE STANDING BY a product Microsoft WE believe! Try to make it in time for Christmas - he will do much for the image of Microsoft. Have a happy Thanksgiving to all!

  Hi Joseph,.

  Follow these steps.

  Go to Start | Settings | Control Panel and double click on automatic updates.

  Check mark the option at the bottom to turn off the automatic updates.

  Click apply/OK, and then restart.

  Svchost consumes always 100% cycles CPU?

  If this is the case, follow these steps.

  Click Start, run, copy and paste this command and click OK: services.msc

  In the list of Services, you can see Background Intelligent Transfer Service ?

  Here's a pix what he looks like.

  

  If it is not listed, follow these steps to register the BITS service.

  Open the Windows search tool, copy / paste the following text, and then click Search: qmgr.dll

  Research should show this file in the following locations:

  C:\Windows\System32
  C:\WINDOWS\ServicePackFiles\i386
  C:\WINDOWS\system32\bits

  It may be present in C:\WINDOWS\system32, but if you can see it, follow these steps to register the service.

  Click on start, run and copy/paste: regsvr32 qmgr.dll and click OK

  Do the same with this file: regsvr32 qmgrprxy.dll

  Reboot the system and then copy / paste this command into the field run:
  %windir%\System32\rundll32.exe setupapi, InstallHinfSection DefaultInstall 132 %windir%\inf\qmgr.inf

  If you are prompted to insert the Windows installation CD, ignore this and in the dialog below, replace the path C:\WINDOWS\ServicePackFiles\i386

  If you could only see qmgr.dll in C:\WINDOWS\system32 you can change the path to that instead.

  Restart the PC and then go to the Services and you should be able to see BITS in the list.
  Double click on it and then on the general tab, click the Start button to start the service manually. This is just a test to make sure that it works correctly.

  If you get 2 error: cannot find the specified file, click on start, then run again and copy / paste the following command, and then click OK:
  Tracking Add HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\BITS\Parameters /v ServiceDll /t REG_EXPAND_SZ /d %windir%\System32\qmgr.dll

  Reboot again and try once more to start the PIECES. It should work fine now, but in the unlikely case where it fails again, run the following command, and then press ENTER:
  Reg add HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesNotToBackup

  Reboot once more and then do the following.

  Go to this link and install the IE8 December Update:
  http://www.Microsoft.com/en-GB/download/details.aspx?ID=41404

  If you use IE7, use this link instead:
  http://www.Microsoft.com/en-GB/download/details.aspx?ID=41442

  Finally, go to the Windows Update site and you should be able to download normally.

• Svchost.exe causing 100% cpu usage during the update of windows, even when disconnected.

  I recently had to re - install windows xp on a new hard drive for replacement. My version of xp home edition, SP2 OEM installation disc. (This is ith group included IE6)

  Once installed and running, could access windows update.

  Read all the threads associated etc. and installed SP3, disc after downloading microsoft on another pc. Installed after three trys, first two caused various mistakes, but third attempt seems OK!

  I've also updated the IE6 to IE8, as some sites obviously did not work properly with the older browser.

  Now go do the automatic updates, or log for manual updates... BUT!

  During the process, my cpu fan comes on fast and permanently! The CPU usage is showing that 100%, pc slows to crawl, the mouse becomes slow etc.

  This has never happened before on this machine before you reinstall clean, he had already automatically updated to SP3 and went very well, it was some time ago, before the failure of hard drive, and it has never had this problem!

  Only since having to do a cleaning manual update and re - install.

  The culprit seems to be svchost.exe, once it is used by the update, running the cpu at 100% and continues to do so EVEN after stopping the service, until I manually stop with the Task Manager!

  The svchost.exe instance showing a high is use: SYSTEM.

  According to the files of help here, it is a known issue and a fix KB927891 was issued for SP2, but this should NOT be necessary for SP3, and in fact difficulty used to perform anyway under SP3!

  Ideas for a guy to fix?

  I appreciate the support for XP runs out quickly, and after this update of windows will be redundant, but in the meantime it is always useful!

  Also if I turn off the automatic updates, how can I stop this annoying popup warning bubble?... I can't live without updating, but this bubble nag drives you nuts! :)

  OK just a update, now running cool and 100% auto update and manual update... How? I hear you ask...

  Well I had a beer and a reflection and came to the conclusion, it must be 'order' in which I updated the clean installation of XP.

  Origin, I loaded the old OEM disc new hard disk, loaded the drivers etc, then stop at windows update for updated files.

  Who told me my old incompatible browser and suggested an upgrade.

  I downloaded and installed IE8... still no joy, reading the forums comments I downloaded and installed SP3... which SEEMED to work, BUT then all the hassle of cpu to 100% with the automatic update and updated manual on the windows don't update site!

  So I just gritted my teeth, formatted the drive, another OEM of XP Home Edition SP2 installation loaded the drivers, installed a copy saved to SP3 and after restarting, THEN installed a saved copy of IE8 and THEN trotted off the coast to the windows update site... low and behold, it the connection without problem, did a search, and required updates appeared on the screen without delay all 123 of them...! :)

  Did the updates, restarted and everything was fine, updates automatic in market and left the machine, after about 30 minutes appears the yellow shield, and it downloads a couple more update files without problem.

  All this time I followed the via the Task Manager CPU usage and the strange spike waited 100% apartment, it was on average from 5 to 20%!...so a great improvement has this effect, by simply changing the order of the updates installed from the original! SP3 IE before IE8.

  May not work for all have to do a clean install because of the HD failed, but its worked for me, and I am once more a "happy bunny!

  Dave was soon.

• W7 100% CPU all the time - what can I do about it?

  Hi and thanks in advance for the help. My computer has very little memory, so I keep it really clean. Do just about everything with him, it is browse the web and stream media. Recently, it has been very slow, and Firefox (49.2) has suspended all the time. At first, I thought it was Firefox, and I followed all of their instructions to identify the high resource using plugins, etc. I deleted the history, ran CCleaner, etc.. Then I realized that even if I close FF I always see spikes frequent (approximately five seconds) to 100% CPU usage, and it often extends by 50% even if I don't do anything. I ran Avast and Malwarebytes and MSE - full scan with each of them and none of them found nothing. Is it possible that my computer resources is hacked and used by someone else?  As for mining bitcoin or something else?  How I understand this and stop it?  If it is little likely, what can I do to improve performance. It seems kind of ridiculous that open a document or a web page to "forever".  Even to write this post, I type, and then look at the screen, while the letters slowly appear...

  Not sure what is relevant for the problem, but I have 4MB of RAM, but the single 80 GB hard drive (hope I said that right), which only 29GB is free. Right now I am 1480 Cached, available from 1725 and ~ 320 is free, there are 69 total running processes. The only applications that are running are FF and two documents LibreOffice.  I checked a few days ago, and the system says that I don't have to defragment.

  I don't even know if all this has nothing to do with the peaks of the processor, so it's how little I know!

  Any help is very appreciated!

  Try running task Mgr, looking for running applications, locate the (s) using all the resources, R.click on this subject,

  Properties, see what/why use that much... In addition, 69 process is quite a bit, will try to run or cmd,.

  type: services.msc scroll through, double click on one, properties, clear the value or manual start. Manual start

  Are available on request. Also, open the event viewer, get the details of the operating system, looking for event/warning,.

  R.Click, Properties. Also streaming video uses a lot of pc resources.

• 100% CPU after deleting store data/VMFS Rescan

  I experience a spike in the CPU (hitting 100% in 'real time' graphic vCenter) after a deletion of data and for a new scan VMFS store. Everyone knows about this problem before? If so, what were the steps you took to solve the problem?

  I'm under Qlogic FC HBA (qle2460) and esx hosts are connected to a Clariion CX4 Bay. I also have PowerPath installed VE. I made sure that I am under the latest HBA driver, but I still have the issue.

  Thanks in advance!

  Problem persists, you should be able to see these messages in your log files.  Until you go to ESXi 5 and can have the Rescan avoid them completely, you can still see these.  At least, I always do and on several different groups.  The time-out makes faster restart, but rescan suffers the same deadline.  Not as long as the shoe, as you have driver loading fc, which causes the delay, then the LUNs and vmfs, scans which adds another time, or two, which is the same question to take 3 times as long as the boot.  The advanced value helps to relieve waiting times of 1/2 of the total, but not all the.  The new analysis includes a timeout during the analysis of lun and not for a reload of pilot.

  At least what I've seen in my experience.

  -KjB

• distnoted consume 100% cpu

  Every now and then my mbp will be completely insensitive because of a process called "distnoted" consume 100% cpu on a period of time.

  Why is this happening? Is this a virus? I have 16 GB of RAM + SSD - surely that should be record high enough to run OSX 10.11?

  The good news is that this is not a virus. This process was created by Apple and runs along the side to provide iTunes supported mobile devices. I would just try and force them to leave the application. http://www.groovypost.com/HOWTO/distnoted-exe-process-running-background-safe/

  Alternatively, you can try going here ... Step by step to fix your Mac

  Hope this helps, good luck to you.

• 100% cpu

  FF uses 100 + CPU on my MacBook, if not totally quickly updated. This, despite making all the suggested fixes, several times.

  It got so bad that it overheats my Mac constantly, causing my fan go on uninterrupted full breath, even when he is in the background, so I basically have to stop using it.

  Mozilla should take seriously and review this off-road browser.

  When they can. Many other users also need help.

• 35.0 Firefox uses 100% cpu on Mac Yosemite 10.10.1 then either breaks or needs force quit.

  I had this problem since installing Yosemite and using 34.0.5. I upgraded yesterday to 35.0 but still the same problem. Firefox will work happily for a while and then all of a sudden will use 100% cpu. I disabled all extensions and plug-ins and that made no difference. If I use Java (8-25), it will usually make it crash but not always.

  To make things worse, the accident report appears in Greek (which is considered in another question already).

  Have you tried to reset Firefox? Refresh Firefox – reset the parameters and modules

• Firefox and Shockwaveflash 14.0.0.145 using 100% CPU

  Firefox (v30.0) normally uses the CPU of 2 to 6%.
  When I start a video using shockwave flash 14.0.0.145, firefox uses 20 to 40% of the CPU and shockwave 50-80%.
  For the most part resulting in a total of 100% CPU usage.
  This problem occurs for a week or two.
  I am running Microsoft Vista.

  You can check for problems with the current versions of the plugin Shockwave Flash and try this:

  • Check updates for your drivers drive graphics
    https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/upgrade-graphics-drivers-use-hardware-acceleration
  • Disable protected mode in the plugin Flash (Flash 11.3 + on Windows Vista and later versions)
  • turn off hardware acceleration in the Flash plugin

  See also:

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Flash#troubleshooting

• Safari more than consuming 100% CPU

  I am currently working with Safari 9.1.1 and whenever it is open it consumes 100% CPU and causes fans on my 13-inch MacBook Air to the race. For example, while describing the problem in Safari with only this tab open my CPU is 102.3% (33.2 MB memory). Besides the closure of the only open tab CPU usage remains high until I have completely quit the application. If I open the same page in another browser, the CPU of the other browser usage is much lower. Any ideas as to what is the cause and how it can be fixed will be very appreciated.

  A simple reset of the SMC should solve this problem. Please read this article to know how to do this in your device:

  Reset the management system (SCM) controller on your Mac - Apple Support

• Why Firefox uses 100% CPU when I am connected to eBay?

  Firefox uses 100% CPU when I connect eBay.

  Hi apdubois, it is useful to know that Flash is the problem but, as you point out, life without Flash is not very interactive.

  It is a standard orientation that addresses the most common reasons for problems of Flash in Firefox. I'm sure you've seen some of it before, but just in case:

  (1) make sure that all recorders/downloaders who interact with Flash media are as up-to-date as possible, or disable them temporarily.

  (2) disable graphics hardware acceleration in Firefox and Flash

  (A) in Firefox, uncheck the box here and restart:

  the button Firefox orange (or the Tools menu) > Options > advanced > General > "use hardware acceleration when available.

  (B) in Flash, see this article from Adobe technical support: http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/video-playback-issues.html#main_Solve_video_playback_issues

  (3) turn off protected mode (Windows Vista/7/8)

  See this article from Adobe support under the heading of 'Last resort': Adobe Forums: how to fix protected Flash Player for Firefox mode?

• process of LSD causing 100% cpu and beachballing

  Hi guys,.

  I hope someone can help me with this.  My computer has recently started using 100% cpu on a process called "lsd".  It totally freezes my computer and I have to hard start it again by pressing the power button.  I can force him to do it is I select a video and then choose 'Open with' as it is pulling up the following windows, it will be beachball and go to 100% cpu due to this process.

  I read something that LINC Davis had previously displayed on the console, so I went there and here's the dump for "lsd":

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.103 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.107 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.110 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.113 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.602 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.605 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.608 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.612 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.615 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:39.619 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:49.392 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:49.451 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:49.467 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:49.484 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  11/05/2016 10:51:49.502 lsd [354]: LaunchServices: could not store file lsd-identifiers to /private/var/db/lsd/com.apple.lsdschemes.plist

  They are all the same, so I'm not going to post it all but there are 4,000 of them in the last twenty minutes.

  Here's my imac:

  

  Thank you very much for ANY help someone can give me

  hardtofin

  You may have a corrupted the Launch Services database.

  To reset the database:

  (1) triple - click anywhere in the following line (it's a very long line) to select; Press command-C to copy

  Ework/support/lsregister /system/library/frameworks/CoreServices.framework/frameworks/LaunchServices.fram - kill - r-domain local - domain-domain user system; Killall Dock

  (2) press open Terminal, on command-V to paste, press ENTER to execute the command

  (3) restart your mac.

• Satellite Pro T130 - 14L: 100% CPU use of acpi.sys after changing the HDD to SSD

  Hello

  because I changed my for one SSD HARD drive and reinstalled Windows 7 with 64 bit on this subject, my system works frequently in 100% CPU utilization caused by kernel module acpi.sys, I discovered with process Explorer and confirmed by recording an ETL file.

  This problem occurs once an hour on average, sometimes after 10 minutes of functioning of the system and sometimes after two hours, no matter which programs are running and whether or not I is actively using the computer. When I noticed a hanging and see this 100% cpu core in the process Explorer window are currently in use, I always need to save my work (which may take a few minutes) and restart the computer.

  I could live with that, but it's pretty nasty. My bios is up to date (version 2.70), as well as my other drivers (no error and no virus found). In other forums I've read, these problems could be avoided by changing the energy registers something Windows settings as never go to sleep of the SSD, but it works in my case as I disabled all energy saving options in Windows and I still have this problem.

  Is there maybe an update of the unofficial bios that could solve this problem?
  I read in another forum, that an unofficial bios update Dell fixed a similar problem on a Dell computer.

  Can someone help me solve this problem please?

  Details of process Explorer:
  The wire with TID 160 and the start address:

  ACPI. SYS + 0X1AF7C

  suddenly starts using 100% CPU and does not stop until you restart.
  Similar problem as in this forum for a Dell PC:
  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com...UM=w7itproperf

  Unlike the Dell problem, there is no appropriate-updated bios for me, could you help me if you could tell me how to stop the kernel module (if it starts hanging or even before). Then I could at least avoid frequent restarts.

• Satellite P200 - 1EE 100% CPU with Toshiba Flash Cards usage

  Resource monitor shows 100% CPU usage constantly in recent weeks (no problem for the first 6 months that I have owned the machine) with 85 to 99% of my CPU used on 2 entries each shown as "Toshiba Flash Cards", no idea why and how I can sort this out as it slows everything down? Thank you very much

  Andy

  Hello

  The utility of Toshiba Flash Cards is a part of the Vista Toshiba value added package and it controls the functionality of buttons FN.
  Kody said already that it is advisable to reinstall the VAP to check if it would prevent the high utilization of the processor.

  You should also clean the operating system using the CCLeaner. After PPV remove you must run the CCLeaner to ensure that all of the VAP files have been deleted.

  Good bye

• Btrfs-cleaning frequently stuck at 100% CPU after put 6.4.0 to level

  Given that I have improved my RN102 to 6.4.0 last night I often struggle to reach the admin interface, and my laptop was reported not being able to join Time Machine.

  When I connect by ssh and use 'top', I see that btrfs-cleaner is stuck at 100% CPU. This can last up to 10 minutes at a time. I only installed about 12 hours ago, and the process of btrfs-cleaner has already more than 85 minutes of CPU time, which is 20 times more than the process of the second long, readynasd which is 4 minutes.

  After a while, btrfs-cleaner falls to 0% CPU and I can access the NAS normally.

  My question: is it normal to have this excessive load of btrfs-cleaner so frequently? Y at - it no configuration setting which affect this behavior. I never noticed this problem under the previous version 6.2.5.

  See you soon,.

  Joachim

  Where it's important, my NAS is equipped with 2 x 4 TB drives in a RAID0 configuration with 40% in use.

  It seems that I found a way to get rid of hanging btrfs-cleaning: after turning off the quota

  Btrfs quota disable/data

  Btrfs-cleaner never appear again (top).

  (After startup, I've usually had a minute to publish the command before btrfs-cleaner spawn and prevented the command answer.)

  I did not intentionally quota - I guess that it is enabled by default.

  Good luck

  HansW

  PS: Maybe the problem is known by Netgear - in their 'FAQ on recent firmware 6.4.0' (see the link at the top of the page) we are talking about «...» "This is probably due to the ReadyNAS was conducting an audit of quota.

  Some sites also describe problems with quota and btrfs (forum Rockstor), other sites quoting quota support in experimental btrfs (but these may be updated).

  I did some tests deepened after diabling quota like that--I'm happy that I have can see my files again...