NAC with RADIUS

Similar Questions

• WiFi WPA2 Enterprise with RADIUS - connection problem

  Hello

  I have here a new ISA 570w with the latest firmware (1.2.17).

  Anyway, I can't get wifi to work in mode WPA2 Enterprise with RADIUS authentication.

  Mode WPA2 PSK are not a problem.

  I have configured the BEAM properly and I can connect directly to him via NTRadPing without any problem. Also the test in the web interface works without any problem (see Figure 2, 3).

  The RADIUS server is a server Synology RADIUS on a Synology NAS, which is a FreeRADIUS server under the hood.

  In the settings of the ISA wireless, I put this RADIUS server for authentication (see screenshot 1, 4).

  However, I can not connect to connect to the network:

  On the iPhone (iOS 6.1.3) I get a prompt for a user name and password, but when I click on connect, it says 'connect to 'cisco3'... ". "and stays there.

  In ISA 570w newspaper, he said:

  Information

  Wireless

  MSG = add MAC station in the list of the ATU. VID = 5; MAC = 5 C: 59:48:02:78:3E;

  Information

  Wireless

  MSG = Wireless mode is a 802.11 mixed b_g_n

  When I cancel the connection attempt, he said:

  Information

  Wireless

  MSG = the Client has dissociated;

  On my Thinkpad with Windows 7 Professional I have everything configured as usual (see screenshots 5,6,7,8) but when I try to connect I do not get a command prompt where I wonder username and password, and finally the connection cannot be established (see Figure 9). Also tried with the same configuration on an another Windows 7 Pro installed costs for laptop with the same problem.

  I can't see any attempt of 570w ISA to authenticate anything in the logs of the RADIUS.

  Also the capture of network traffic on the LAN to the Synology NAS port does not show the RADIUS datagrams.

  I already disabled COP because I read that it can cause problems, but it did not help.

  Can you please suggest something else I can try?

  Thanks in advance!

  Kind regards

  Dominik

  I saw these screenshots, but that screen settings just select the button set up next to the authentication method in the section user authentication, under users.  In each of your screenshots, the RADIUS server identification number is 1, so I would also ensure that I configured the server ID RADIUS 1 that can be configured by going to users-> RADIUS servers.

  All that said, I have seen that your tests have passed and I also do not understand the point of having the RADIUS settings on other screens and then to have info ID RADIUS.  My thought is that you'd be able to pre-set RADIUS users of-> screen RADIUS servers and then select the RADIUS server ID in all other screens without having to enter the RADIUS news over and over again.  He also thinks that you could ignore the users-> screen RADIUS server and enter RADIUS information over and over again and it should work... as you set up initially.  However, based on the past experience of programming errors, I recommend configuring the ID from RADIUS server 1 under user-> RADIUS servers if you have not already... just in case where.

  Shawn Eftink
  CCNA/CCDA

  Please note all useful messages and mark the correct answers to help others looking for solutions in the community.

• AAA with RADIUS of ASA

  Hey everybody,

  I'm with RADIUS AAA configuration on our Firewall remote ASA.  It's pretty simple, but I have some firewall that does not work on.  I upgraded the IOS image on the ASA 5510 to ASA804-K8. BIN on each of them.  The weird part is some of them work and some of them do not work.

  I was wondering if anyone else has encountered this before and what information do you need to give me a reference to help.

  Thanks in advance,

  Kimberly

  Hi Kimberly,

  just curious: why 8.0.4 and not 8.0.5?

  What you use radius for? What is the radius server? You have configured all the ASAs of the radius servers? Did you use the right shared secret?

  Is there something different between the ASAs working and does lack those? Configuration, location in the network, etc.?

  If the above does not help, please post the config of ASA failure (or at least the relevant items and be sure to remove all sensitive data) and the output of:

  Debug RADIUS

  Debug aaa authentic

  Debug aaa 254 Commons

  You can test only the part of RADIUS with the command «test aaa-server authentication cli...» »

  HTH

  Herbert

• Color of 3D text drawn with RADIUS Excursion

  3D using drawn with RADIUS, I can extrude text to make it 3D. How to change the color of the excursion on the text. I don't know how on a form, but not on the thanks text.

  Go to animate - side - colors - RGB

  

• Comment of the NAC with WLC Server

  Dear all,

  I just need to confirm that it is possible that we add same WLC to AC (wireless users), as well as NAC comments Server (wireless guest users) or do I have to WLC plus one for the comment of the NAC server.

  Kind regards

  Hello Nameair

  You don't need separate WLC... NAC comments servers are perfectly normal RADIUS servers, used for authentication. You can integrate your existing WLC, in addition to IB or OOB to your certification authority, with the comment server. I enclose a doc who gives information on the configuration of wlc and host servers.

  I hope this helps... all the best... happy new year to you. the rate of responses if deemed useful...

  REDA

• 802. 1 x authentication with Radius and win7 Mab

  Good afternoon!

  I have a question about 802.1 x I've set up a laboratory in which I have configured authentication mab with 802. 1 x, but I have a weird behavior of my network controller. On the switch (4948e), I see that the user is authenticated and authorized, and I can see my switch these outputs:

  21 April 15:13:30.263: % AUTHMGR-5-START: start "mab" for the customer (a01d.48ac.b7f
  (5) on the Interface item in gi1/11 AuditSessionID C0A8DF9C0000002E002F3DAC
  * Apr 21 15:13:30.267: % MAB-5-SUCCESS: authentication successful for the client (a01d
  . 48AC.B7F5) on the Interface item in gi1/11 AuditSessionID C0A8DF9C0000002E002F3DAC
  * April 21 15:13:30.267: % AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: authentication result 'success' of me
  ab' for the client (a01d.48ac.b7f5) on the Interface item in gi1/11 AuditSessionID C0A8DF9C00000
  02E002F3DAC
  * Apr 21 15:13:31.299: % AUTHMGR-5-SUCCESS: authorization succeeds in for the customer (a0
  1d.48AC.B7F5) on the Interface item in gi1/11 AuditSessionID C0A8DF9C0000002E002F3DAC

  If I type "see the authentication session", the corresponding output.

  Switch #show authentication sessions

  Interface MAC address method ID of Session of field status
  Item in gi1/11 a01d.48ac.b7f5 mab DATA Authz success C0A8DF9C0000002E002F3DAC

  The thing is that when I check my network controller, it said "authentication failure". That's what I've done so far:

  1. I restarted my pc, the same behavior.

  2. I disabled and enabled my network controller, the same behavior.

  3. I rebooted the switch and re-configured. Same behavior.

  4. I tried with another PC configuration. Same behavior.

  5. I changed the configuration of "user authentication" using dot1x EAP authenticator and it worked.

  This is the configuration I have on my switch:

  AAA new-model
  Group AAA dot1x default authentication RADIUS
  Group AAA authorization network default RADIUS
  start-stop radius group AAA accounting dot1x default
  AAA - the id of the joint session

  !

  control-dot1x system-auth

  !

  Switch #show run gigabitEthernet int 1/11
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 128 bytes
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/11

  Cx-to-Host description
  switchport access vlan 223
  switchport mode access
  Auto control of the port of authentication
  MAB
  end

  This is the first time I'll put up a configuration 802. 1 x. I'm doing something wrong?

  I really hope that I am not the only one with this kind of behavior!

  Thank you for any assistance you can give me!

  Status: Authz success

  This means that the port is open. Is this permanent? Keep looking at the output of the show a few minutes see if it tries to dot1x too. Can you ping from the PC?

  As authentication of 802. 1 X is enabled in the properties of the map NETWORK PC that you can expect dot1x method runs on the switch and eventually respond to the computer with auth fail. Authentication in the PC box is not necessary for MAB.

  What type of RADIUS server you use and there 802.1 policy X in addition to MAB policy?

  IP address: unknown

  This means that the switch did not recognize the IP address of the host, probably due to the lack of

  analysis of IP device

  command. But it is not necessary for the plain MAB or dot1x.

• AP541N cluster with Radius UC540 Server?

  Hi, so using the radius in the UC540W Server works a treat if the wireless network comes from the CPU area.

  But if the AP541 is serving the wireless network, I can not RADIUS to work.

  I have removed all my networks in the UC area and have disable the wireless interface (tried with the wireless active too).

  The local RADIUS is active and the installation program on the CPU area.

  But still nobody can join and authenticate!

  Any ideas or advice? Known issues?

  I followed all the directions to a tee!

  Hello Jeremy

  Thank you for contacting the Support Forums of community of Cisco.

  When you use a UC540W with an AP541N, it is suggested to not use the AP and turn off the wireless on the UC540W.

  To use Windows clients, the authentication server must support PEAP (Protected EAP) and MSCHAP V2. How is your Radius server in the setup of UC540W?

  To ensure that the radio itself works OK, can you, or have you tried to do just the WPA or WPA2 with regular encryption. See if you can connect, authenticate and roam the network.

  Please keep us informed.

  Eric Moyers
  Concentrix at Cisco. : | :. : | :. CISCO | Eric Moyers | Expert in the field. Cisco technical support |
  [email protected] / * /.
  Together, we are the human network

• WLC with RADIUS question

  Hello

  I have the following strange behavior:

  My WLCs connects to the RADIUS server by using the IP address of a dynamic interface instead of using the IP address of the management interface.

  Dynamic interface Tha is on the same subnet / vlan from the RADIUS server.

  What is the best interface to use for RADIUS authentication?

  And how do I decide which interface shuold be RADIUS-source IP interface to connect with my radius servers?

  Thank you all

  Johnny

  If you have the Radius Server on a subnet in which you have any interface on the wlc on, you will see the wlc by using this ip address. The ip address of the client AAA you should use is the dynamic ip address. The only time where you will see the wlc use its management interface is your wired and wireless (dynamic interfaces) are on different subnets.

• 1141n multiple with RADIUS AP SSID

  I have two 1141n APs.

  I have the first configured as a root AP based on RADIUS (LEAP) using the

  I also have this thing configured using AES CCM.

  My clients are connecting to him with WPA2-Enterprise, obtaining 144Mbps. perfect.

  The question is this second access point.

  How do I set up for my users can walk to semlessly between the two AP?

  I have to config it with the functionality of Ray as well?  That would be a pain

  Any help would be great!

  Jeff

  Hello

  All you need to do is configure the second AP to point to the first IP address as its Radius Server, but keep in mind that if you do and that the primary AP fails, the second is unable to authenticate users because the RADIUS server will be available!

  Configuration the two AP to save each will be of course tedious but a more resilient approach.

• NAC with CA

  Is it necessary to use the CA with NAC.

  If we donot use what is the impact on users.

  We can deply without this no problem

  Talha,

  Yes, it is possible to deploy NAC without AC. You can use self-signed certificates or a certificate from a third-party provider (Verisign or Godaddy etc.)

  HTH,

  Faisal

• C2960 with RADIUS

  Hello, everyone!

  I have a problem with the dynamic assignment of VLANS. The Setup is actually the following:

  RADIUS host - Switch - Server

  I have no problem with authentication, messages without any problems.

  The thing is that the switch does not seem to notice the extra info than the server RADIUS provides, for example the [64] Tunnel-Type, [65] Tunnel-Medium-Type and [81] Tunnel-private-Group-ID.

  Here is my configuration sw and RADIUS configurations

  Current configuration: 1795 bytes

  !

  version 12.2

  no service button

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  !

  Switch host name

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  !

  AAA new-model

  !

  !

  Group AAA dot1x default authentication RADIUS

  !

  !

  !

  AAA - the id of the joint session

  mtu 1500 routing system

  IP subnet zero

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  control-dot1x system-auth

  !

  !

  !

  pvst spanning-tree mode

  spanning tree extend id-system

  !

  internal allocation policy of VLAN ascendant

  !

  !

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/2

  switchport mode access

  dot1x EAP authenticator

  self control-port dot1x

  protect the dot1x violation-mode

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/3

  switchport mode access

  dot1x EAP authenticator

  self control-port dot1x

  protect the dot1x violation-mode

  !

  interface Vlan1

  10.2.1.4 IP address 255.255.255.0

  no ip route cache

  !

  IP http server

  IP http secure server

  RADIUS-server host 10.2.1.2 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813

  RADIUS testing123 key server

  !

  control plan

  !

  !

  !

  end

  The VLAN are:

  Ports of status for the name of VLAN

  ---- -------------------------------- --------- -------------------------------

  1 default active Gi0/1, Gi0/2, Gi0/3, Gi0/4

  Gi0/5, Gi0/6, Gi0/7, Gi0/8

  Gi0/9, Gi0/10, Gi0/11, Gi0/12

  Gi0/13, Gi0/14, Gi0/15, Gi0/16

  Gi0/17, Gi0/18, Gi0/19, Gi0/20

  Gi0/21, Gi0/22, Gi0/23, Gi0/24

  2. the active MAN

  3 active GRE

  4 active BLU

  13 COMMENTS active

  99 active NATVIE

  1002 fddi-default law/unsup

  1003 token-ring-default law/unsup

  1004 default fddinet law/unsup

  1005 trnet default law/unsup

  The RADIUS user is:
  UserC Cleartext-Password: = "pass3".

  Service-Type = Framed - User,

  Tunnel-Medium-Type = "802,"

  Tunnel-Type = "VLANS."

  Tunnel-private-Group-Id = 'free WILL '.
  Version of IOS 12.2 (44) SE6
  As you can see, it's a pretty standard configuration, and although authentication works, dynamic assignment of VLANS is not.
  Any ideas on what might solve the problem?

  Add the following code to your configuration and test again:

  Group AAA authorization network default RADIUS

• NAC with security rtr

  Hello

  We want to implement a NAC solution for people who call the House HO, then goes to internet through our internet router.

  This router contains the security feature and NAC is activated (you can see it from the web interface)

  However, a partner of cisco suggests to use the clean access server and not the router security.

  is there an advantage of the use of the own access servers or limitation of security rtr.

  Note: we only need check windows updates and antivirus updates when computers access the internet

  Well, both the NAC framework (SNAC on your router) and NAC Appliance (Clean Access Server) will work. You can dial via PSTN/ISDN or VPN using Cisco VPN Client. In addition, you can buy NME-NAC-K9 module for your router and it will work as clean access server.

  To use the framework of the NAC, you'll also need Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS CS) 4.0 + (4.1). It's a commercial RADIUS server and is not cheap.

  In addition, to check the antivirus updates your antivirus product must be accompanied by the NAC framework or device. For a list of supported products, take a look at:

  http://www.Cisco.com/go/NAC

  NAC http://www.Cisco.com/Web/partners/pr46/NAC/partners.html (frame)

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/NAC/appliance/Release_notes/416/416rn.html (NAC Appliance)

  Framework of the NAC that you will need to integrate provider .dll files in the Cisco Trust Agent (for all of your providers of antivirus!), and then distribute CTA all the PC user using a mechanism out of band (not easy). CTA is a must for the NAC framework.

  NAC Appliance automates this. It is a stand-alone product (not .dll files). Clean access agent can check the anti-virus supported by himself. It can be installed on the PC via a mechanism out of band or downloaded from the login Web page. In addition, Java / ActiveX agent is supported and can check your PC for compliance as well.

  Verification of Service Pack number is not

  difficult in these two products. However, to check the patches for Windows, you need to create complex rules as part of the NAC. When a new patch is released by Microsoft, you will need to change your rules manually (not easy). NAC Appliance automates this. It can download rules on the Cisco site. But you will need to purchase technical support for it.

  In general, set up and maintain the framework of the ANC are not an easy task. However, you can buy additional products, integrating them into the frame and they will automate a lot of things for you. It is cheap and easy. NAC Appliance is autonomous. You don't have to be anything else.

  HTH

• Unable to set authentication of IPSec with RADIUS clients

  Hello

  I configured the VPN IPSec server for remote clients on Cisco 2811 with XAuth (see attached cisco vpn configuration). Initially, I configured clients extended authentication (Xauth) using a local database of IOS users and it worked fine, but then I tried to configure the authentication of clients through FreeRADIUS and got authentication errors (see part of freeradius log attached): in fact, instead of username/password name customer shipped Xauth Cisco sends a VPN-group/pre-shared key combination to FreeRADIUS. Obviously FreeRADIUS does not name of user and password in its database and answers with an error. Is it possible somehow to reconfigure Cisco such that it would be sent insead of name of user and password to VPN-group/pre-shared key or reconfigure FreeRADIUS so that he would interpret the VPN-group/pre-shared key parameters?

  xauth to the radius server must be not sending the group name and the password to the RADIUS. xauth should send the user name and password when the user authenticates.

  (1) you can try to authenticate to the server radius of the router itself, using the command 'test aaa'--> check if authentication works.

  (2) when you connect with the vpn client, you get prompted for the user name and password, and what do you have?

• Using CHAP with RADIUS authentication

  Hello

  I configured a Cisco 877 router to send the RADIUS requests when a user connects to the console (Console line) or VTY Line using the following configuration:

  AAA new-model

  Group AAA authentication login default RADIUS

  Group AAA authentication ppp default of RADIUS

  RADIUS-server host 10.0.0.1 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1812 mysharedkey key

  When I connect the RADIUS packets I see the Cisco router sends the initial AccessRequest using PAP.

  How can I configure my router to send it's original AccessRequest package with CHAP?

  My apologies if this has already been discussed, I searched high and low for an answer.

  Thanks in advance.

  John

  Hi John,.

  PPP connection supported by CHAP because a configuration command to activate the CHAP protocol as Protocol of stimulus / response. However, the Console VTY connections and to THE will always go on PAP when using RADIUS authentication. There is no command to activate the CHAP protocol for these types of connections.

  Best regards.

• Assign privileges on ASA with RADIUS

  Hello. I use ASA 5510 8.2, ACS 4.2 for windows and RADIUS for auth.

  I would attribute private user to logon level. Docs says that I must send Cisco VAS CVPN3000-privilege-level (id is 220), but I don't see this option in the configuration of the Interfaces.

  How to set this attribute to the ACS? Maybe somehow I can specify manually GO?

  Thank you.

  You can control the level of privilege maximum with this pair of AV, but you cannot assign a privilege level during its connection as you can do with authorization exec on IOS.