NAT on the router WRT120N.

Similar Questions

• IP NAT on the router on SSL - VPN appliance

  Someone at - it allows to transmit 443/SSL on a SSL VPN Cisco 891 - K9 unit?

  (I have never encountered this situation before as the router VPN terminated public face directly or we had several IPs public to assign the VPN device directly a public IP address).

  With ' ip nat inside source static tcp 44.55.66.255 443 10.10.10.150 443 extensible "is supposed to pass the SSL request to the appliance SSL VPN to 10.10.10.150 to have VPN applications ended here.

  But failed miserably body 891 - K9 created a virtual ARP entry for 10.10.10.150. So two MACs with the same IP address.

  So 443 requests were sent to its interface. At the hearing of NAT, I can't ssh inside SSL - VPN, but by the time the statemet disappeared, I can ssh and warning dupliacte ARP goes.

  * 1 Nov 19:22:46.871: % IP-4-DUPADDR: duplicate address 10.10.10.150 on Vlan10, a source of aaaa.bbbb.cccc
  * 1 Nov 19:23:18.083: % IP-4-DUPADDR: duplicate address 10.10.10.150 on Vlan10, a source of aaaa.bbbb.cccc
  * 1 Nov 19:23:48.295: % IP-4-DUPADDR: duplicate address 10.10.10.150 on Vlan10, a source of aaaa.bbbb.cccc
  RTR #sh clock
  * 19:24:26.487 UTC Sunday, November 1, 2015
  RTR #sh ip arp 10.10.10.150
  Protocol of age (min) address Addr Type Interface equipment
  Internet 10.10.10.150 - e02f.6d96.8dd0 ARPA Vlan10
  RTR #sh ip arp 10.10.10.150
  Protocol of age (min) address Addr Type Interface equipment
  Internet 10.10.10.150 - e02f.6d96.8dd0 ARPA Vlan10
  RTR #sh sh ip route 10.10.10.150

  Cisco TAC to reproduce this problem at the moment to report dev.

  Does anyone else have this problem or a workaround?

  Thank you.

  I may be misunderstanding but isn't your NAT statement backwards IE. If you want traffic to pass to 10.10.10.150 it shouldn't be-

  ' ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.10.150 43 43 44.55.66.25x.

  isn't the device for SSL connection on interface 'ip nat inside '?

  Jon

• client ipSec VPN and NAT on the router Cisco = FAIL

  I have a Cisco 3825 router that I have set up for a Cisco VPN ipSec client.  The same router is NAT.

  ipSec logs, but can not reach the internal network unless NAT is disabled on the inside interface.  But I need both at the same time.

  Suggestions?

  crypto ISAKMP policy 3

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  !

  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group myclient

  key password!

  DNS 1.1.1.1

  Domain name

  pool myVPN

  ACL 111

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  Set transform-set RIGHT

  market arriere-route

  !

  !
  list of card crypto clientmap client VPN - AAA authentication
  card crypto clientmap AAA - VPN isakmp authorization list
  client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer
  10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap
  !

  interface Loopback0
  IP 10.88.0.1 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/0
  / / DESC it's external interface

  IP 192.168.168.5 255.255.255.0
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  media type rj45
  clientmap card crypto
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  / / DESC it comes from inside interface
  10.0.1.10 IP address 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside<=================ipSec client="" connects,="" but="" cannot="" reach="" interior="" network="" unless="" this="" is="">
  IP virtual-reassembly
  the route cache same-interface IP
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  media type rj45

  !

  IP local pool myVPN 10.88.0.2 10.88.0.10

  p route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.168.1
  IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.0.1.4
  !

  IP nat inside source list 1 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
  !
  access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 111 allow ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 111 allow ip 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255

  Hello

  I think that you need to configure the ACL default PAT so there first statemts 'decline' for traffic that is NOT supposed to be coordinated between the local network and VPN pool

  For example, to do this kind of configuration, ACL and NAT

  Note access-list 100 NAT0 customer VPN
  

  access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255
  

  Note access-list 100 default PAT for Internet traffic
  

  access-list 100 permit ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 ay

  overload of IP nat inside source list 100 interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  
  EDIT: seem to actually you could have more than 10 networks behind the router

  Then you could modify the ACL on this

  Note access-list 100 NAT0 customer VPN
  

  access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.255.255 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255
  

  Note access-list 100 default PAT for Internet traffic
  

  access-list 100 permit ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.255.255 ay

  Don't forget to mark the answers correct/replys and/or useful answers to rate

  -Jouni

• WRT120N - wireless capability commonly fails and requires the router to restart

  I bought the router WRT120N wireless about a month ago and have found this camera WiFi functionality fails systematically.  I have several wireless devices in our House, but it's the iTouch from Apple that use it most of the time.  Every day or two wireless stops working and I have to rebooot the device through the web administration page.  Then, everything continues to work for a while until what we notice that it has not yet.  I have updated the firmware on the router to v1.0.04 and carefully followed the instructions, but it made no difference.

  The search on the web revealed that it was a widespread and well-documented problem.  Several other messages Forum warn consumers to avoid buying this product cheap and unreliable.

  I'm about to abandon the device back to the store I bought, but thought I'd give another chance to this forum to see if there is any fix or alternative.

  Please notify.  Thank you.

  FYI - I ended up taking my router back to the store I bought and received a new identical replacement unit.  This other has managed to keep the network wireless for a week or so now, so I guess that the former, I had was a dud.

  In the end, none of the suggestions on this topic were no help.  The unit was just defective.

• PAT on PIX vs NAT overload on router

  Better question practice...

  It's better to perform PAT through a NAT overload on a router bastion with a static on the PIX instruction or PAT on the PIX configuration uses a global IP address?

  Other alternatives?

  Example of router *.

  Router configuration

  IP nat FirstPAT 172.16.5.100 pool 172.16.5.100 255.255.255.0

  FirstPAT IP nat source list 10 overload

  access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.255.255.255

  PIX installation

  static (inside, outside) 10.10.10.0 10.10.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  Example of PIX *.

  Global (Outside) 1 172.16.5.100

  NAT (inside) 1 0 0

  Thanks in advance for all the messages!

  In my opinion, there is no real compelling reasons to go with one idea on the other. Probably, I would lean towards leaving the PIX do NAT, but I could be swayed. The reason is that the PIX has essentially already been NAT (all back on the same address). But again, either should be good.

  A suggestion however if you went with overloading NAT on the router would be to do it with a map of the route as opposed to the example of access list you have. Something like this:

  IP nat FirstPAT 172.16.5.100 pool 172.16.5.100 255.255.255.0

  IP nat source map route nat FirstPAT overload

  route nat allowed 10 map

  access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.255.255.255

  This creates a NAT entry in the NAT table on the router.

  Good luck.

  Scott

• WRT120N Wireless laptop connected to the router, but does not connect to internet

  I have a HughesNet HN9000 modem connected to a Linksys WRT120N router. I have two desktop computers, both running XP Home, connected to the router via ethernet .5e cables and work perfectly. I have a laptop running Vista Home Premium, I am trying to connect to the internet via the internal wireless card. According to me, the laptop connects with the wireless router, as it connects but says 'Local only' - it won't let me access the router IP/control panel. I tried to reset the router / modem as well as the parameters of the laptop, but I keep getting the same question.

  If I connect the laptop and the port #3 on the router via a cable .5e I can browse the Internet. But I need to be able to use the laptop throughout the House so electrician is not an option.

  I found this article which directed me to this download , which worked. If your help is most needed. Thanks anyway.

• Access after you turn off the router/nat [WCG200 v1]

  I use the WC200v1 for a while and it was a lot of work.  I disabled the router/Nat and comes to be used as a modem only.  After you disable the routing/Nat, you are given an IP address, which still allows access to the device.  I don't remember what is this IP address.

  I have another device offering routing/WAP capability.  The WCG200 acts ONLY as a modem.

  Someone knows what IP to use to still access the device or should I just connect my PC directly after performing a factory reset.

  Thank you!

  -t0ken

  Use http://192.168.100.1/ router and Nat have been disabled.

• Router WRT120N - EE disconnect once per hour

  Hello
  Just Yestarday (16.02.2010) I bought router WRT120N-EE. I had problems with disconnection from the beginning.
  I got the cable modem. I connected wrt120n modem, following the 2 PC viaethernet ports connected to the router. I am beeing cut exactly almost hourly. It happens on two PCs at the same time. Router is always reconnect after that and everything works fine until the next hour or two. I have to admit that this router is trying to reconnect two times. First attempt is always unsuccessful. Everything takes about 2 seconds (his reaction as to during the registration of the changes in utility browser, or reset, beds off).

  • I have not upgraded to the latest firmware due to other problems of people with 1.0.0.4 version (mine is default 1.0.01).
  • Currently I have not all wireless devices so I turned off WiFi (if connection son makes these difficulties whats going to be with wireless...:/).
  • Without beeing plugged my modem router and everything works fine.
  • IM using Norton 360 and running under Windows XP SP3 (with the help of Windows Firewall and the firewall of the router also), but I don't think that's the problem.
  • I have not changed MTU (it has the default value, do not think that is more the problem).
  • I already have a power Cycle.
  • Im not not via PPPoE (Keep-alive), but the server DHCP - automatic configuration.
  • NAT is enabled, MAC clone, etc...
  • Ive tried to enable or disable UPnP and other options as a couple, but nothing seems to work.

  It's my second Linksys router. With first a WRT54GL, there never any problem (same PC, same setup, same supplier). It works almost 2.5 years now without a single reset...
  Help, please

  Ok. It seems that this router is working properly after restore factory defects, reconfiguration with utility based on a browser and power cycling. I think he got in some kind of a loop, after that I changed the term of the Client lease for 1 hour. This time ive customized only strictly necessary parameters for my ethernet network. I hope that so ill start doing something more complicated than the MAC address cloning, it will not 'crazy' again.

  Also, I have to test it on wireless over the next week... Thanks for the replies. If something goes wrong ill post it here.

• Firefox prevents the connection from the router

  WRT120N router Linksys-Cisco, Firefox 22.0

  I discovered that my router rejects all attempts at connection (192.168.0.1, 401 authentication failure "browser can not perform authentication or authentication failed") when you browse to it from Firefox. It allows the connection when the attempt is made of Chrome.

  I remember having long ago something similar with Firefox, but resolved by disabling the option "say it me not to follow the sites", following what connections made; just looked and it is still not verified - if this isn't it.

  I looked a the packet capture and the password IS sent to the router, but it rejects the connection.

  Any ideas?

  "BUT IT WORKS CORRECTLY BOOTED IN SAFE MODE."
  Which prompted me to check the extensions.
  I called, guess what... TAKE STEPS TO TRACK ME.

  (Why is there such an extension if it is built in function?)

  Disabling, allowing the router to connect! I don't know why twice now, try to activate Do not not track eliminated the possibility to connect to the router... but this is the solution.

• run the server in vmware under the router (shared ip)

  Hi im using router (shared ip) and
  both the host and the guest os is xp pro
  now I can run the Web server on the host operating system after that I have a lot of hard work
  but I want to move the guest from the host computer operating system server
  in the host, what I do is
  first as part of TCP/IP in wireless (since i Using the notebook with wireless)
  Use the following IP address
  IP address: 192.168.10.201(for pas s'écraser avec les autre ip)
  Default gateway: 192.168.10.1
  and put the DNS
  and advanced tap goto and goto internet connection I allow YOU sharing any other user of the network to connect through the internet connection from this computer, VMware Network Adapter VMnet8
  and I go to the router setup page and set the
  1 DHCP OFF and
  2 DMZ host IT with 192.168.10.201
  and
  in VMware
  1 goto NAT > NAT setting >
  Port forwarding > Hostport 81, address IP of Machine virtual 192.168.88.201:81

  But if anyone else tries to access my WAN IP they consulted the Web server of the host computer
  and I don't know how can I access Barbershop Web os server from the host
  Thanks in advance

  Hi Teayun,

  Thanks for visiting the site of the community of Microsoft Windows XP. The question you have posted is related to VMware and would be better suited to the VMware or TechNet community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will support what ask you

  http://www.VMware.com/support/
  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx Shawn - Support Engineer - MCP, MCDST
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think

• E8350 in Bridge mode allow me access to the router with 192.168.1.1

  I have a small home network with the E8350 (AC2400) and a PK5001A of Qwest ActionTec modem.  I needed to put the router in Bridge mode to enable NAT in the modem works properly.  By simply disabling the NAT in the E8350 network broe. Once I placed the E8350 in bridge mode, I lost connectivity via 192.168.1.1.  The network seems to work correctly, I can't access the router remotely.  Is this normal or is it a different setting I'm missing?

  When you have done this, you probably have a new ip address of the primary router. See what she is looking at the main router connections or by manually adjusting it 192.168.1.2 or some other ip that is in your network. If the primary router uses a different subnet as 192.168.0.x, then you must use an IP also in this same range.

• Linksys E2500 connection to the router/Modem Combo?

  I have a Linksys E2500 and I'm trying to connect to my service provider supplied router (Actiontec V1000H) because I wanted the best range and consistent connectivity for my 6 wireless devices.

  My problem is that, to do this, I connected an ethernet cable from the yellow the E2500 internet port one of my V1000H LAN ports. This, however, did me not internet access even if the network for my E2500 was available in the network list and selected as the default network. I then had to go the the E2500 advanced and changed the IP address of the router from 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.2.2. This gave me internet access.

  However, everyone I talked to including employees and experts at dslreports said that, because of what I did I put in place a double NAT with 2 potentially conflicting of IP addresses and on the road weird questions will arise because of this. They suggested that the E2500 connect to a modem dedicated to avoid this problem. However, the dedicated modem, that I was sent was defective and did not allow for access to the internet, even through the ethernet connection. So, until I get a new modem dedicated, I have to use the combo router/modem.

  What should I do? Should I implement the E2500 as just an access point wireless for my modem/router combo existing? What should I change in the advanced settings? Or is there an alternative?

  Check this link:http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=785463d9ecaf4cac84aed245b08d615f_3733.xml&pid=80&r..., this will help both routers LAN - LAN cascading.

• My router wrt120n will not connect to my ps3

  My router wrt120n will not connect to my ps3, it was working fine, now it dosnt send a signal, but my computer is connected and works fine. Any suggestions on how to solve this problem. I have tried reseting and leaveing it and the modem unplugged for a while, but did not work.

  So I clicked on the icon of the router in the center of the page. went to "changing wireless protection" and everything I had already reset. Now, it works great!

• Run DHCP on the router with DSL internet

  I currently have internet DSL with Bell (Canada) with my wrt160n router connected to the modem. I've been reading around and it seems that my router should use PPPoE rather that DHCP is currently using it. I guess that of maybe the reason why I have a strict NAT on xbox live I tried all the solutions found on this forum and nothing done. In the ip address of the router status tab is a private IP (e.g. 192.168.x.x)

  Your help would be really appreciated.

  If you want to go back to the previous settings in your modem, simply connect your modem to your computer and input 192.168.2.1.  Enter your b1 # and password and hit save.  Reconect the modem to the router and change the settings to auto dhcp.

• Problem with router WRT120N

  OK, so I have the linksys WRT120N wireless router, and I have a lot of problems connecting to internet, when I plug in my router to the modem and so on, I only get to my connection to the local network and cannot connect to my network. But if I use my modem, I can connect to the internet. BTW, I have a cable modem and my firmware is up to date on my router.

  Hi Cleano and welcome to the forums! Please click the link below for instructions on how to configure the router.

  To configure a router with cable Internet Service