New PC w / continuous closures - system performance issues

Similar Questions

• Satellite P200 - 1 K 9 and performance issue

  I hope IM this ad in the right area...

  Hello

  I have a Satellite P200 - 1 K 9 with the following specifications:

  Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 @ 2.40 GHz CPU
  3 GB RAM
  32 bit
  Note Windows experience 4.8

  ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 map graphic and one
  HD sound card...

  My problem is that since I bought my laptop about 7-8 months ago slowed down the performance. Of course, since then I had filled my hard drive (partition) with the media and understand that this is at the expense of the performance of the system. However, since this grateful I released a lot of disk space. I have 40 GB free on my C: and 90 GB free on my D:. Total, shared capacity is 250 GB (125/125).

  Basically, while being largely ignorant of the technical questions, laptops and technology altogether, the way I noticed the inability of systems to "return" to its original factory running (which, I might add, I was very impressed by) is when it comes to games. Football Manager 2009, for example running very slowly. I had a peek in the Task Manager, because I play the game in a window, and the CPU usage works 100%, although I'm sure the culmination of the individual tasks and Applications is not equivalent to that (maybe there is a program hidden Hogging my CPU speed?). Call of Duty 4, which took place on medium-high graphics settings when the laptop was new, now struggles on the lower graph and the sound settings, without that there is a problem with internet connectivity. In addition, (for reference, I m not not the game breath) Battlefield 2, which is about 3-4 years of age very slowly also works. He ran too extremely fast, on the highest graphics settings when the laptop was brand new.

  Basically, what I want to do, is to return the system to its original performance. It is always too slow when two hard drives were full of games and media. Now, despite the withdrawal of many of them, the system works like a sloth.

  Means I ve done to solve performance problems are: disk defrag, disk clean up, error checking, virus scan (with Kaspersky), scanning of spyware (with PC tools Spyware Doctor), deleted the old files with CCleaner and erased files not deleted with a program called eraser... As well as the release of about 50% of the disk space.

  Add to that, I ve noticed performance was much more when I first turn on the laptop and the sides of it n t had the chance to become hot. I understand what is normal, and he did before when the laptop was new and was operating at optimum performance, but perhaps I have an overheating problem? I'll let you know what is the temperature, but I put just t know.

  I hesitate to return the system to its factory settings and if necessary I'll take to a computer store, if there is something they can do. But in the meantime I d like to listen to any advice on general issues that I face, and possible solutions to my problem.

  Thank you very much.

  The problem with Windows is that it becomes slower and slower that you operate.

  When the devices and programs are installed, they increase the size of the registry, activate the Services, add resident DLLS and drivers, slow down the file system by adding thousands of files. As well, the operating system can get damaged after some time due to the loss of power and software poorly written.
  Even if you use CCleaner and other utilities and uninstall several programs, it is never as fast as a fresh installation of windows. Uninstalling programs rarely remove the program completely 100%.

  The antivirus can have a huge effect on performance, that's why the system runs great when the image of the plant is installed (which has usually no anti-virus).

  So basically if you want the system making a lot once again, you must back up your data and perform the recovery. I myself do it once a year to restore performance.

• Performance issues with large number of nodes

  I am creating an application to display graphics (large), for example:

  

  But I ran into some performance issues, even for a relatively small number of nodes in the scene graph (+-2000 in the picture above). The graph is built, step by step, adding circles and paths to a StackPane. Circles and paths can be semi-transparant. For a small number of nodes, I get a solid 60 FPS, but this decreases over time to about 5 frames per second. As soon as I stop adding new nodes, the framerate shoot again up to 60 images per second. The framerate drop even when all the nodes are outside the viewport.

  My questions are:

  * Is Platform.runLater () call to 2000 times a minute too?

  * This might just be a problem with my graphics card? (I have an Intel HD Graphics 3000)
  * JavaFX pulse recorder says such things, are there meaningful information in that I'm missing?

  PULSE: 1287 [163MS:321MS]

  T14 (0 + 0ms): col of CSS

  T14 (0 + 5ms): layout pass

  T14 (6 + 152ms): waiting for the minutes of the previous

  T14 (158 + 0ms): copy the State for graphic rendering

  T12 (159 + 0ms): dirty opts calculated

  T12: Path of the slow form for null

  T12 (159 + 160ms): painted

  T12 (319 + 2ms): Presentable.present

  T12 (321 + 0ms): completed the presentation of painter

  Counters:

  Background image of the region used cached: 14

  NGRegion renderBackgroundShape slow path: 1

  Nodes displayed: 1839

  Nodes visited during rendering: 1840

  Kind regards

  Yuri
  

  Basically, try some optimization of performance ranging from the simple to the complex.   Each of the changes below may provide you with an increase in performance.  Some will probably increase performance much more that others (depending on where is the real bottleneck).  I would probably start by replace the paths to the lines and reduce the number of Platform.runLater calls (as adding nodes that fall within the viewport can be difficult only).

  > The framerate drop even when all the nodes are outside the viewport.

  Place the nodes in the graph, which fall inside the viewport.

  > Is Platform.runLater () call to 2000 times a minute too?

  Yes, there is no reason to call it more than 60 times a minute when the framerate of JavaFX is capped at 60 frames per second by default.

  > This might just be a problem with my graphics card? (I have an Intel HD Graphics 3000)

  Yes, it's a graphics system relatively low-end.  But, look at the comment of developer below - your CPU and choice of graphic primitives can also affect rendering speed.

  > Adding circles and the paths to a StackPane

  You don't need a StackPane to this, a group is a container easier and probably better.

  > may be semi-transparant

  Remove transparency * may * cause acceleration.

  ----

  You run may be:

  https://JavaFX-JIRA.Kenai.com/browse/RT-20405 : improve the rendering of path performance

  Maybe if you use lines rather than the paths, performance might improve.

  A comment by a developer on this performance tweak application is:

  «It is quite normal for applications that use arbitrary paths (if the node path objects, SVGPath, polyline, or polygon) because these paths are rendered in software.» As card circle, Ellipse, line and Rectangle very primitive forms easily to the operations that can be performed entirely on the GPU, which makes them essentially cheap. There is no need to compare the rendering of a complicated shape for rendering of simple primitives for this reason. »

  ----

  Setting the cache indicators can help, but probably only if you animate nodes.

  ----

  Present level of detail of your graph functionality so a chart with zoom out is not make as many nodes as a part of zoomed in.

  ----

  You run any code important calculation on the JavaFX application thread that could stall it?

  Can make you available a ftom so that others can reproduce your problems?

• Management performance issues and huge catalog

  I shoot architecture and real estate. I turn every day hundreds of frames and my current catalog becomes huge. I'm also starting to see a huge performance hit recently. Last night I just changed until 03:30 because LR would take some time as 20 seconds to perform a single task (like changing a slide or photo of the flag). A lot of time spinning beach ball. I have an external hard drive which I support to locally.

  What I was wondering is if I have everything except the most recent project files copy the disk external then keep it unplugged when I WIP edition if it would help performance issues?

  MacBook Pro (10.9.5) and LR CC running. I optimized my catalog and I also have a Cocktail for Mac running on my system to clean the memory, etc.

  Other ideas of huge catalogs management would be useful. I prefer not to make a new catalog for each customer that I shoot several each day and passing backward between catalog every day would be a pain in the thigh.

  Hi KristianWalker,

  Have you tried to increase/purge your Cache? See How to improve and accelerate the performance of Photoshop Lightroom for more ways to optimize Lightroom.

  Also what size is your catalog at the moment?

  Kind regards

  Assani

• Adobe Air performance issues?

  I have recently finished a huge project in Adobe Muse and I love the new sensitive design tools. However, as the project continued to develop, Muse has become increasingly slow to react and interact with the sensitive cursor was almost impossible. As someone who worked for Apple, I'd be the first person to point the finger my Mac and offer to buy a new computer, but it is a new, maxed-out MacBook Pro 15 inches. All other Adobe CC applications work without problem. When Muse was first published, as I remember, it was written on top of the Adobe AIR platform, instead of being natively written in C++. That this has something to do with performance issues that I see? If so, is there something I can do to improve performance, I see?

  Air is not basis for Muse more for a long time. Nativly revised muse was released in early 2014.

  In my view, the Muse team works actively on performance boosts, but I think that we should not expect any miracle: no other application I know not a calculate and display real-time changing dynamically and the same objects interactively from time on endless pages in response.

  In my opinion, the only way to significantly increase the speed would be gray on all goods during the move of the scrubber.

• VCO performance issue?

  We have upgraded a VCO stand-alone server to version 5.5.  Expand the folder objects to data center and host when using vCenter 5.5 plugin can last up to 10 minutes.

  Upgrade process

  1. export the packages and configuration

  2 order services and uninstalled the application

  3. has taken a backup of the MS - SQL Database and and got up a new database in its place

  4. install the new version of the application 5.5

  5 import the configuration and the packages in the application.

  Has anyone seen this behavior? or better yet have a fix for this?  5.5 seems to be significantly slower than version 5.1, we were in front.

  Specifications of the system running virtually...

  Win 2008 R2

  2 CPU i7

  12 GB OF RAM

  The Java heap size has been increased to...

  maxHttpHeaderSize = "163840.

  It is a new version of technical overview of vCenter plugin available here.  Version of technical overview of VMware vCenter Orchestrator plug-in for VMware vSphere 5.5.x

  This version fixes some performance issues related to vCenter inventory and plugin starting aceptinag of workflow as vCenter parameter objects...

  It will be useful.

• Untangled RoboSource slow performance issues

  Hi all
  
  I'm a noob-Robo (noobie, novice, etc.) but not new computers and databases and others. We have a team of 5 authors are all working on separate projects but under even version RoboSource Control. We know some questions serious performance: projects can take over an hour to check outside or inside. not all users can see projects; "Rename" do not get rid of the old actually prefer a copy under the new name (?); etc.
  
  I'm trying to 'normal' basic behavior for RoboSource Control as well as some best practices for multiple users. I wonder if there is something more in depth to describe the RoboSource Control engine and possibly maintenance tasks to help what seems to be a jumble of nodes that are not all necessary, too many users "admin", etc. I expect that the "cleansing" will solve many of our problems.
  
  So, rather than go in each problem in the forum, I prefer to find the right resource and to tackle this thing by iteration.
  
  Thanks for your useful suggestions
  
  Don

  I wanted to update the forum about this performance issue. After further investigation, we note that serving PC server worked for 6 months without interruption. In addition, she has 512 MB of RAM, but the ROBOSOURCECONTROL service consumed 350 MB of it. The rest of the system resources were probably permutation are busy. A reboot which is brightened and RSC performance is splendid - from 30 to 60 minutes, until about 15 seconds for a GET or a check-in.
  We suspect there is a memory leak in CSS, but I can start a separate thread for some tips on how to identify and report a bug for this package.

  Thank you all

  Don

• Performance issue of SAP with Oracle 10 on Sun SPARC T5240 server

  Dear friends,
  
  We have a performance issue after the migration of our basic system of SAP ERP 6.0. To new servers, we moved a month ago.
  The report of EarlyWatchAlert SAP response time of CPU is too high, although the CPU utilization is never more than 5%,
  
  The current system is:
  
  Database server: Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 Server - 2 CPU´s with 6 core wire 8, 1.2 Ghz 32 GB RAM
  and we use a different identical server configured as an application server.
  
  Database is Oracle 10.2.0 and Solaris 10 operating system.
  
  The problem is CPU average response time is 450 ms and maximum CPU load is 5% percent.
  
  Configuration prior to migration with the old servers, we got the answer of CPU: 150 ms and max CPU load: 50%.
  Old configuration: 2 X HP rp3440, 2 X PA 8800 (2 core, 1.0 GHz) CPU.
  
  You have experience with a similar situation, setting that could be bad for server CPU´s not making full use?
  or you know any similar configuration for benchmark?
  
  Thanks in advance
  
  Uzan

  The new server's processors in Niagara? If so you could run in the known performance issue identified in MOS Doc 781763.1 (Migration of fast single machine threaded CPU to CMT UltraSPARC T1 and T2 causes an increase in the CPU reports)

  HTH
  Srini

• Version 6 of the Java performance issues

  It's kind of a continuation of the following thread:
  
  Performance of Java 1.6
  
  
  The question of the moose in the previous thread is not the issue. This is what came in the thread on the performace of Java 6 which I want to talk.
  
  
  My question is, is there anything new about the performance issues associated with Discoverer Plus and Java version 6? In my office (and others will benefit from its interventions to the referenced thread), we have problems of considerable achievements with Discoverer Plus (web version) with a PC with Java 6 on them. Some symptoms are: no no not able ge before the login screen, severe downturn PC or PC locked alltogether. To work around these problems, we were push PCs to Java version 1.4.2. Do the restore immediately takes care of the problems of slowness, lock up or connection problems. However, some of our applications in our office now requires Java Version 6. People who need new applications cannot use great Discoverer, because their Java version (Java 6), causes the discoverer to bog down.
  
  Is there a longer version and Java which took in charge the performance issues with the discoverer? Or maybe a patch. Our technicians helpdesk said that some versions of Java 6 had some security issues to consider. But as Java 6: update 11 had taken care of its security concerns. Update of Java 6 11 supported performance issues? Y at - it a patch for this version that made?
  
  
  
  Thank you

  Hello
  Certainly there is a performance issue if you have Java 1.4 on the server and Java 1.6 on the workstation. I hope you have discoverer 10.1.2.2, 10.1.2.3 with CP1, 2, or 4 or less CP6, you need to update Java on your server to equalize it with the version on your workstations. Some will say that older versions of 10.1.2.2 ok to upgrade Java on but I'm not sure.

  I recently mafe announcement on my blog which may help: http://learndiscoverer.blogspot.com/2009/04/be-careful-when-upgrading-to-java-16.html

  You will also find interesting information in this note on MetaLink: 728452.1

  Also, once you have upgraded your Java Server I recommend clearing the cache of Java on stations of local work and using Add/Remove programs to remove all older versions. Some people go as far as the removal of all versions of local Java that allows the server to discoverer of re - install the required version.

  Best wishes
  Michael

• Recovery of the factory from 32 bit to 64 bit with the note system performance

  Recovery of the factory from 32 bit to 64 bit with the note forever system performance, it's about associated wire
  http://forums.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=50433
  which is closed/locked, and had no correct answer.

  I just bought a Toshiba L750. After learning of the default Windows 7 installed is Windows 32 bit, I decided to go Recovery Wizard from Toshiba upgrade to 64 - bit. However, the process is stuck to the system performance of note, that repeated several times for 2 hours.

  Given that I guessed that screen performance of system just note one full screen of a normal process of Windows, so I pressed the button Windows start to display the taskbar which showed a component of Adobe installation process has failed. In any case, I clicked on the install Adobe on the taskbar button and close the window.

  The note system performance then continued with about 10 steps ahead after 15 minutes. All well done.

  So the trick is to close a window of the installation components that get stuck. Hope this helps some Toshiba laptop users out so hard.

  A suggestion from bits to the team of Toshiba laptop:
  The full screen of the Recovery Wizard is good to hide technical details from users. However, if hang in some components, like the Adobe component I've seen, this will be confusing and advises current defects if the end-user following some in the thread above, legacy because of some missing components and the wrong configuration. It is preferable that the wizard of recovery to exit full screen at a given time, or the wizard handles error scenarios better.

  > So the trick is to close a window of the installation components that get stuck. Hope this helps some Toshiba laptop users out so hard.

  Thanks for sharing this with us!

• Slow system performance

  Hello

  My brand new laptop of Hp-pavilion p001tx is 5 days that only, its execution is slow compared to the configuration system. My first use, it takes time for any task.

  So, kindly help me to improve the performance of my system. I'll be very grateful to you if your suggestion works me.

  Thank you.

  Hello @MohdOmer,

  Welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience! To help you get the most out of the Forums of HP, I would like to draw your attention to the Guide of the Forums HP first time here? Learn how to publish and more.

  I read your post on how your laptop behaves slowly with any application, and I'd be happy to help!

  To increase the speed and performance of your operating system, I recommend later in this document on the system performance slow resolution (Windows 8). This should help with speed your applications run.

  Please re-post with the results of your troubleshooting, and I look forward to your response!

  Concerning

• improve system performance slow slow start

  I have a HP Netbook, Mini210 - 1018CL
  I can, t activate the account Windows Firewall assumes that because he, s not active administrator.
  Account main is fine, the firewall is turned on

  Hello

  1. which version of the Windows operating system is installed on your computer?

  2. what happens when you try to turn on the firewall?

  3. do you get an error message?

  4 Aare you the administrator of the computer?

  5 are you facing performance issues or slow start up when starting up?

  If you are the administrator, you must grant the appropriate permissions to make the changes. You can make changes only in being logged on as administrator.

  I suggest you to go through the steps mentioned in the link and the Coachman.

  What are user account control settings?

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/what-are-user-account-control-settings

  See also:

  Firewall: Frequently asked questions

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/firewall-frequently-asked-questions

  Performance and maintenance

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/help/performance-maintenance

  http://www.Microsoft.com/athome/Setup/optimize.aspx

  http://support.Microsoft.com/mats/slow_windows_performance/en-us

  These links are applicable for Windows Vista and Windows 7.

• I want to change on the new 32-bit 64-bit system.

  Original title: transition from windows to new system

  have windows 7 installed on 32-bit and set system to upgrade to windows 10. you want to change the new 64-bit system. backup is 32-bit how to get 64-bit without losing my product key

  Review:

  How to: switch from 32-bit versions of Windows to Windows 10 64-bit

  Windows 10 right digital uses, so as long as the 32-bit Windows 10 is activated, so you won't need a new product key, go just to perform a custom installation.

• Performance issues when coming out of sleep

  I recently built a gaming PC. On Christmas day, I finished putting the thing together. It has an Intel i7-4790 CPU running Intel HD Graphics, 8 GB of Corsair Vengeance RAM, an Asus Z97 - A Mobo and a 2 terabyte Seagate HDD. I installed Windows and put everything in place. Then a week later, my MSI GTX 970 arrived in the mail.

  So, I take the thing to sleep and decreases the performance of the whole thing. Videos YouTube stutter, simple as games fight of World of Tanks to run at its usual rate of 60 fps. To avoid this, I simply restart my comp and then it works fine. performance is back to normal.

  A few weeks, Windows gave me a message on one of the Nvidia drivers causing performance issues when you wake up from sleep. I don't think a lot of it and rejected it. I'll try to reinstall all my Nvidia drivers. I uninstall the Intel HD graphics driver a few days ago and has not changed anything. I would appreciate an answer to this problem because I would like to continue to use the "sleep mode" because it consumes less energy and prolongs the life of my case of LED. Thank you!

  In order to diagnose your problem, we need run Windows performance toolkit, the instructions that are in this wiki

  If you have any questions do not hesitate to ask

  
  

  Please run the trace when you encounter the problem

• improve slow system performance... I don't know what programs need to run at startup? Please help me I have windows 7 Home Basic

  . I don't know what programs need to run at startup? Please help me I have windows 7 Home Basic

  Each computer has different startup programs - if you if you stop that you need you can turn it back on. See step 5 to turn them off.

  Windows 7 is slow

  (1) unplug all devices such as printers, external hard drives, microphone, webcams etc.

  (2) if the computer has only 1 GB or 2 GB of RAM, try adding more RAM.
  (3) make sure that your drivers are up-to-date.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/update-a-driver-for-hardware-that-isn ' t-work correctly
  (4) defragment your Windows 7 computer:
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/improve-performance-by-defragmenting-your-hard-disk

  (5) reduce the start up programs:
  (A) click Start, type MSCONFIG in the search box and press ENTER.
  OK the authorization of user account control and password if necessary
  (B) on the general tab, click Selective startup.
  (C) then change the tabs by clicking on the start tab
  (D) uncheck the programs that you do not want to start when your computer starts (do not turn off your antivirus).
  (E) click OK, and then restart the computer.

  (6) disable some visual effects in Windows 7
  There are a lot of Visual effects that can be disabled safely to speed up Windows 7.
  A. Click Start, right click on "Computer" and select "Properties".
  B. click on "Advanced system settings" in the left pane to open the"System Properties".»
  C. Select the "Advanced" tab from him. Then, under 'Performance', click on 'settings '.
  D. now uncheck all the options that you do not want to use (some options disables Aero).
  E. restart the computer.

  (7) open the resolution of Performance problems
  A. open the Troubleshoot utility of performance by clicking on the button start.
  (B) in the search box, type "convenience store" and then click Troubleshooting.
  C. under system and security, click on search performance issues.