Not crisp vector mask

1) called on a solid green rectangle

2) chose the shape once again the tool and the option value of path instead of shape layers

(3) draw an oval or rectangular trajectory

(4) in the layers panel, choose Add a vector mask

Even if the density is 100% and 0px feather in the mask Panel, I'm blurry / faded / or borders jagged/pixelated.  Y at - it a setting I need to adjust to make this a vector mask strong.  According to me, it seemed just before (with net borders) - do not know if I accidentally messed up something.

Thank you

According to what you try to hide, any pixel, crossed by the border of the vector mask will certainly be partially hidden in the interest to create a smooth edge.

But pace the image of a greater number of pixels and the edge of the remains of vector mask also crisp it was.

Maybe I don't understand what you expect to see.

This is normal:

-Christmas

Tags: Photoshop

Similar Questions

  • Resize the photo but not the vector mask?

    If I use a vector for a picture of drawing as a mask, can I then change the picture and hide individually?

    There is a point in the center of the photo which allows me to move the mask, but how can I resize the photo without resizing the mask and resize the mask without resizing the photo?

    Thank you

    Hold down the Alt/Option + click this point blue Center to move/adjust the mask without worrying if the thumbnail of the layer is active.

    Regarding resizing regardless of them, I'm not aware of all the shortcuts except for:

    Decouple (click/enable/disable the link between the thumbnail of the layer and the mask thumbnail)

    Select the thumbnail of the mask.

    Change the values (W/H) in the PI. (You can also do the same thing here for the active layer thumbnail)

    Here is a tip that I use a lot of the time:

    Use AutoShapes like masks. It is those who have points in the canvas "controller" that allow to resize, change the angles etc.

    Example:

    A. open/import an image file.

    B. Edit > cut the image/bitmap to the Clipboard.

    C. adding a Rectangle object rounded on the Web and have it active before moving on to the next step.

    D. Edit > paste inside the contents of the Clipboard (the image).

    The result is your image with the a vector mask was consistent with the auto shape (in this case, the rounded Rectangle).

    That's the problem - select the vector mask thumbnail and you will see again "anchor controllers" there: resize and corner radius.

    h

  • Vector mask thumbnails in the layers panel

    In Photoshop CC, vector mask photos see room for files and raster layers, but they don't show up for layers of fill (i.e. layers of form). How can I get a feature similar to Photoshop CS5? There is a sort of thumbnail of the shape layer, but the square icon covers 1/4 tile that makes partially useless.

    Choice you seems to be staying with an older version of dead of Photoshop or to adapt your workflow to the modified form of the Photoshop UI.

    You can simulate a shape layer to some extent to get the vector mask thumbnail. However, you would not have layers of Photpshop shape and features.

  • Why no automatic selection + drag selects a layer with a mask even though I select a zone that does not include this mask?

    This behavior has been here for a while and makes no sense.

    If I use a mask vector on a picture, for example, why on earth I would select if I select / dragging around the layers, which does not include this vector mask?

    I'm wasting a lot of time with this behavior/problem. I don't want to lock / unlock all my layers with a mask at all times to avoid this.

    With work plans, it's even worse that the layers with a mask can be selected on another plan of work and then I'm select / drag!

    Unfortunately, this feature is not so smart than that. It detects only if there are pixel in the original layer, and it does not take into account the layer masks. Most often I find the automatic selection more annoying and frustrating to use than the benefits it has.

  • Vector mask in Adobe Photoshop CS6 no longer works?

    I got CS6 for about a year now and it worked perfectly... However, last month, I noticed that my vector mask not working. It used to be a small black icon that would show where I erased (or "colorful above") things - now that is just fuck.JPG ... not only that, but he seems to have lost most, if not all, of its features. It does the OPPOSITE of what I want to do. I read somewhere that if you put "target path", we can fix things, but photoshop won't let me click on this option... I tried to restart my computer and I tried to reset photoshop to its original settings, and nothing has worked! Help, please.

    The vector mask settings are rigid, so if you used the option subtract when making a path, it will stick to that. Simply select the icon path combine in the main menu bar.

  • is it possible to reverse a vector mask?

    A mask of pixels can be reversed.  Why is it not possible to reverse a vector mask?

    But each of the SupPathItems has its shape operation which can be changed in the Options bar.

  • Vector mask making in front of what it should

    I'm editing a brochure template and I have dynamic objects with vector masks for photos. The problem is when I insert a photo into the layer below the layer containing the vector mask, part of the photo to be displayed (the path of the form) does not, while the cutting bit above the form is displayed.

    Is there an easy fix for this? All the sources I consulted has another solution.

    In FW I combine forms and click on 'create a mask' and be done in 2 seconds...

    Select your vector mask and use the path Selection tool to select the path in your mask. Go to the menu bar and make sure to combine forms is selected. If she is still reversed, select subtract from shape.

  • Question about the functionality of vector mask

    Hello everyone, I'm fairly new to Photoshop CS 5 so I apologize if I'm asking the wrong type of questions, here goes:

    When you work with vector masks you can:

    (1) "the link" or a vector mask with the other images? ' sharing ' a picture (for example) if I did 'A Building' then duplicated, but wanted to change what build a looked like, I have to only change the mask of the source, then the copies would be updated.

    (2) move the independent image of the vector mask (it seems that I can only move the vector mask, not the image itself). Or in other words: I can move the image and have the mask to follow, instead of being only able to move the vector mask within the limits of the image?

    My application of the question:

    I do a top-down 2D layout of a zone of type "Paste". I did to fill the buildings, building A, B, C, etc. and use multiple copies of each building. Ideally, I would like to be able to 'link' or share say building has a vector mask with all other instances of building A (so that when I change the master, they all change to the new form of mask). The second behavior I have trying to find is the ability to move without moving layer where the vector mask is on this layer (since it seems that you can only move where the mask is, which means that even if I could share masks, they all finish by in the same sense of place I have to re - position each hand again.)

    Any ideas are appreciated, thank you for reading.

    When you work with vector masks you can:

    (1) "the link" or a vector mask with the other images? ' sharing ' a picture (for example) if I did 'A Building' then duplicated, but wanted to change what build a looked like, I have to only change the mask of the source, then the copies would be updated.

    Yes, it's possible, but not with the classic system layer vector mask in Photoshop. Layer masks are part of a layer and not the layers themselves, so that they can be converted into a reusable object.

    The solution is to avoid vector layer masks and use a clipping/layer instead mask. A clipping/layer mask CAN be converted into a smart object that is reusable, and when you change one, all the other instances are also changing.

    The second part of the solution is to convert the layers contained both the clipping/layer to a smart object mask. Then the batch group. By the way, if your buildings are made up of several elements simply to include these additional elements in the clipping group. Another advantage is that each of the elements may still have its own normal layer mask. Win win situation. And layer effects can be applied to layers/clipping masks, once again what is impossible for layer masks. It also opens the doors to a much less destructive workflow.

    (2) move the independent image of the vector mask (it seems that I can only move the vector mask, not the image itself). Or in other words: I can move the image and have the mask to follow, instead of being only able to move the vector mask within the limits of the image?

    This is also solved with the use of layers/clipping masks - the content and the mask can be moved independently in regular layers. Another advantage is that the two can also be transformed individually.

    My application of the question:

    I do a top-down 2D layout of a zone of type "Paste". I did to fill the buildings, building A, B, C, etc. and use multiple copies of each building. Ideally, I would like to be able to 'link' or share say building has a vector mask with all other instances of building A (so that when I change the master, they all change to the new form of mask). The second behavior I have trying to find is the ability to move without moving layer where the vector mask is on this layer (since it seems that you can only move where the mask is, which means that even if I could share masks, they all finish by in the same sense of place I have to re - position each hand again.)

    Any ideas are appreciated, thank you for reading.

    So here's my solution. I made a sample with two buildings, the view from above which could be reused as desired:

    (1) first of all create groups for each building and place the content to those. Then trace layer vector shapes on the content. Set the transparency for layers of mask to a reasonable of opacity for masking easier.

    (2) put the vector shape under the layer of content for each building. Then, for (1) and (2), , click on the border between the content and the shape layer. (

    (3) then we will turn this building into recyclable items. Convert each content and layer to a smart object clipping mask. Then rename these layers of dynamic object into something sensible (honestly, I forgot to label the layers well earlier, but you catch my meaning here ;-)

    Fact! To clone each building, duplicate layer groups. For each instance that you can move the content (which is handy if you share multiple charts of building in the same bitmap or illustrator file), or you can decide to move the mask in place. Or both. It is the same for the transformation. Your choice. To move or transform a building, select the layer group.

    To change or modify the masks or the contents, double-click the smart object of your choice and make a few changes.

    Also, remember that you can insert additional elements in a clipping group by placing it over the first layer and then clipped by clicking again on the border between them. So, in theory, you could start building different looking buildings by adding other dynamic objects in clipping groups. The sky is the limit! In this way, you can create several building blocks to build various buildings with different looks. And still limit the number of blocks - and any update-able.

    Unfortunately, that's when the workflow breaks down a bit: due to the implementation of the object dynamic in Photoshop, you can't change the mask or the contents of the building in context - instead, it opens in its own window of file. This can be somewhat mitigated by placing the two windows side by side (window-> fix--> double vertical installation).

    This brings us to the second caveat: when you make a change, the changes are not updated in real time in the master document. You must first save it. Still a bit of a flow of work, but when same breaker... At least you now have a workflow not destructive instantiated.

    The content of the dynamic object can be replaced easily with a right-click of the mouse on the smart object layer itself. Or use a dynamic object referenced externally instead if you prefer to generate your buildings in an external application.

    BTW, the layer of Photoline system is much more logical and easier to use for this type of work. Layer masks behave like regular diapers. Layers, groups, masks, layers of external file and so forth can be practically cloned and instantiated as smart objects, but the main object is editable in the context, and all the other instances updated in real time. So, it is more convenient. At least this is my experience.

    I hope this has been helpful! Now go build your cities. :-)

    PS: I thought: isn't Illustrator or InDesign is a much more logical choice for this type of work where you need access to reusable blocks of content? It would also be a more efficient workflow and faster - Photoshop is not really designed for this type of work. Illustrator and InDesign provide potentially out of better quality. You can also divide your work into the pages and so on. Here again, you would probably lose the flexibility of smart objects.

  • Change the path inside and outside areas in the vector mask

    Hey all lovers of the PS/CS,.

    This is probably an easy, yet, being pretty new to this, I have to ask.

    I have so this vector mask on a layer, and singing along to the Beatles I'm changing tracks on this subject. Well, what it is is a rectangle to crop a photo, nothing crazy. This rectangle is too big for my taste - so I just draw another, smaller on the inside and plan on deleting one.

    But! The second, smaller rectangle is considered to be a delicacy to take away the first (so its interior is considered to be 'black' mask-wise, that is cut out, and its outer part is 'white', which is kept in). Thus, when you remove that first, largest, the entire image will appear, except for the part that I want in the Middle, which is cut! Yes - it's the opposite of what I want.

    Now, I tried to use the path selection tool and change the fill color of the rectangle, but you can not... So, how you reverse both inside and outside of a closed path? Thanks in advance!

    Charles

    So, how you reverse both inside and outside of a closed path?

    Select the path with the tool Selection of track and in the Options bar change the path of the operations.

  • Add the path to a certain vector mask

    Hey all lovers of the PS/CS,.

    Of course, my question is something that needs to happen a lot and a lot. I just created a vector mask on my bed, and then I went straight by making a path for him. But I did not notice that the mask was not selected... So my path removes nothing of my original layer! It's just a way of hanging around - and it disappears when I select the mask or another layer.

    So, how preserve this path and it adds perhaps the vector mask, it was initially intended to? Thanks in advance.

    Charles

    To bring together the two paths

    If they are not on the same layer plicque in the tracks Panel, select copy and paste it into the other.

    Select the pen tool and hold down the CTRL (Cmd) key to temporarily select the direct Selection tool and drag on the outline of one of the paths.  Release the Ctrl key to return to the pen tool and add a point on the path, and then delete this point.  This creates a break in the path.

    Do the same thing to the other segment of the path.  Place the cursor on the end of one of the broken paths until you see the icon string (2nd in the table below) and add a point.  Place the cursor on one of the ends broken the other way and repeat.  Repeat for the other two endpoints.

    Add, delete, change the path to what you want. Job done.

  • Remove the vector mask in Photoshop CC fill layer

    I use Photoshop CC and I can not remove, disable or rasterize a vector mask that is applied to a layer of fill or gradient.

    Am I missing something?

    Delete the vector mask is to press the keys Alt + Ctrl (Option + Cmd) and

    slide the bottom of the icon/pattern/gradient fill layer in the layers panel to the trash can at the bottom of the layers panel.

    You can disable the "vector mask" Shift clicking the path icon in the properties panel.

    A way to replicate the pixelation is a vector mask Ctrl (Cmd) click on the shape layer icon in the Panel layers, add a

    layer mask and then delete the vector mask as described above.

  • How to add a vector mask?

    Hello:

    I would like to draw a circle with the Ellipse tool, and then add a vector mask

    I would like to duplicate the layer and then select the thumbnail of the mask vector in the layers panel so that when I select the pen tool intersect shape areas is available

    However, I can't seem to get the vector mask it is always grayed out to be available no matter what I try to do.

    I'm trying to add a "glossy" effect to the circle using the pen to draw a shape through it horizontally then upward and around the Summit of and join and closing it so that I can add a white > gradient trans.

    can someone help me please? I read the index of help etc until my face is blue and everything I read will not work.

    Thank you for your time.

    PS. using Ps cs6 and Windows 7

    Any given layer can have a pixel and a photomask vector. When you use one of the form tools, such as the Ellipse tool, you actually create a vector mask on a layer of filling. It was more apparent in earlier versions of Photoshop, but the user interface has been simplified so that the filling and the mask are now an icon in the layers panel. If you cannot add an additional vector mask to this layer, but you can add or subtract to the existing form of vector in the mask to change with the existing tools of vector.

    So, do exactly what you trying to do, but do not forget that the single icon see you in the layers panel after creation of the ellipse IS a vector mask, then you don't need to add anything more.

  • Vector mask is Grayed Out?

    Hello:                                                                              cs6 windows 7

    I read on the vector mask here: http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/masking-layers-vector-masks.htmlhttp ://

    but I still have trouble getting things to work... I get what I'm still having w / the concept of disorder, but at least I'm not giving up... right?

    so I have a BG layer > new layer on which I drew a circle and apply Layer Styles

    Then, I would like to apply a vector mask and then duplicate the layer and select the vector mask thumb nails in the double layer so that I can use the pen tool value box shape intersect so that I can draw a shape w / Pen that will create a "Glossy effect.

    That's what I try to follow to learn more about the vector mask: http://http :// www.mintyferret.com/photoshop/photoshop-rss-icon-tutorial/1/

    This is the section where I'm stuck due to lack of complete instructions and my knowledge/understanding

    RSS_Forum.pngSee how the lesson shows a vector mask on a shape layer 1 and layer/duplicate? Well, no matter what I try I can't get a vector mask applied in the same way.

    When I go to layer > vector mask it is gray. ??

    Since I posted this I read some more articles on how to use/do a vector mask but nothing I've read has worked. Please help me I'm so frustrated

    I read on another website w/info on vector mask that if it is grayed out I just need to duplicate the layer but when I do that it is not yet available.

    I tried to use a layer mask to nothing does not

    what Miss me? How to make the available vector mask?

    Your time and your efforts are greatly appreciated. Thank you!!

    OK, maybe this video will help you.

    http://www.silkrooster.com/Adobe-forums/shapes-and-paths.MP4

    The video is 4 MB. No sound.

  • Error of vector mask after mask - Mac CS5 edition

    Hello

    When I create a vector shape of rounded corners, and then apply a mask of gradient vector, the result is as expected: the gradient in the vector mask clears the object according to the mask.

    If I then change the mask (either by moving the start and end points or trying to make the end point not fully transparent) the gradient stops abruptly.

    The result is a mask with a gradient that stops short about 30px from the end of the object - so I can't see the point of gradient and cut just the mask.

    Don't know what I'm doing wrong - any suggestions would be welcome.

    See you soon

    Ben

    I have run both in this and think it's a bug. While you can't avoid it, you can fix it.

    In the layers panel, click the icon screen between the mask and the maskee. It breaks the relationship of size between the two objects.

    Select the mask in the layers panel, and then use the scale tool or the w and H fields in the properties panel to correct size.

    Connect the two objects by clicking in the screen area.

    HTH

  • Using vector masks to mix the layers

    I selected a part of a front and copied on a new layer. I then made some changes to the new layer with the tools fluidity and want now to merge the copied layer returns with the original layer. I create a vector mask on the layer and I start painting the edges of the new layer of black to blend it back with the under layer. Although I see the results, I'm not quite clear on what it is.

    1. by painting with black is far just erase parts of this new layer to allow the under layer to show through? He's doing any sort of mixture or is just erasing the masked layer?

    2. How is this different from just using the tool eraser to erase the updated layer and leave pieces under Show return?

    Thank you.

    To answer your other question, the only time you want to apply the mask is if you want to remove the mask for a reason any. But then you lose the advantage of a mask on the Eraser tool, you cannot change your mind and change the mix. I suggest that you keep the mask and do not apply. The results in the composite image is the same.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there a small adapter for R600?

    Such a nice little laptop, such a great power adapter... Anyone know if there is a small adapter available and where can I buy it?

  • Film test F5

    Hello!I did this test with the new Sony F5 + logger 4K. https://Vimeo.com/65962767 And: You can download the version of 4K (sorted / exported) (1 GB):oussar.de/portfolio/Kurzfilm-Hunter-Sony-PMW-F5-Cinematic-Short All opinions / criticism? :-D

  • How to read the two columns of data in a file of PDM.

    Hi all I am reading two data columns for the 2nd of a PDM file two sheets, as shown below. Two columns of data must then be shared so they can be displayed in a xy chart and also apply a linear adjustment VI. I implemented the graph xy and linear adj

  • Exchange 2013 RTM upgrade to cu9

    We are almost new with Exchange 2013 and we are running on the RTM version. I understand the list of updates is available already for 2013 Exchange in a form of CU (cumulative updates). If I'm not mistaken it is already in its 9th CU. My question is,

  • MICROSOFT SECURITY ESSENTIALS; SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY VS. WINDOWS DEFENDER

    AFTER YOU INSTALL MICROSOFT SECURITY ESSENTIALS AND SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, MY WINDOWS DEFENDER WORKS EVERY DAY. IS THERE A CORRELATION OF THESE THREE THAT IS CAUSING THIS PROBLEM?